A Heggstad petition can resolve situations where estate assets were intended to be moved into a living trust but the legal title was never formally transferred. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, our approach focuses on clarifying the sequence of events and gathering the documentation courts expect, such as trust instruments, deeds, and evidence of intent to fund the trust. Filing a Heggstad petition asks a California court to recognize that property belongs to the trust despite omission of a recorded transfer. This process can help avoid probate, streamline trust administration, and protect beneficiaries’ interests while honoring the decedent’s planning choices.
When family members or fiduciaries encounter unrecorded transfers after a trustmaker’s death, the legal and emotional stakes can be significant. A successful Heggstad petition requires clear facts and persuasive proof that the assets were meant for the trust. We assist clients in assembling declarations, deed histories, and contemporaneous notes that demonstrate intent, then prepare and present the petition in the correct county court. Our services are tailored to preserve family harmony and reduce delay. Clients receive careful guidance about timelines, possible objections from heirs, and potential outcomes so they can make informed decisions at every step of the process.
A Heggstad petition can be essential for achieving the original goals of trust-based estate planning when a deed or other transfer document was never recorded. The main benefit is the court’s ability to retroactively acknowledge that trust assets include the property in question, preserving the settlor’s intentions and the beneficiaries’ expectations. It can prevent the delays, costs, and public exposure associated with probate and clarify title for future transactions. Pursuing a Heggstad petition also provides a legal record that supports the trustee’s authority, makes assets available for distribution according to the trust, and reduces the risk of later disputes among heirs and creditors.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across Alameda County with focused estate planning and trust administration work. We guide trustees and family members through the technical and procedural requirements for Heggstad petitions, helping to collect evidence such as trust documents, deeds, and communications showing intent to fund the trust. Our approach balances careful legal preparation with practical problem solving to reduce delay and limit conflict. Clients benefit from attention to detail in drafting petition pleadings, preparing declarations, responding to potential objections, and coordinating with title companies when court confirmation is obtained.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing under California probate rules asking the court to treat certain property as trust assets despite the absence of a recorded transfer. The petition explains why the asset was meant to be part of the trust, often relying on evidence such as the trust document, contemporaneous instructions, signed declarations, or other indicia of intent. The court evaluates whether the transfer to the trust was intended and whether recognizing the property as trust property would reflect the trustmaker’s desires. The process helps trustees exercise authority over assets and can simplify distribution according to trust terms.
The Heggstad petition procedure typically involves preparing a detailed petition, compiling supporting documents, and serving interested parties who may object. If the court is satisfied that the asset belonged to the trust, it may issue an order declaring the property to be trust property, enabling the trustee to manage or distribute it without probating that specific asset. The proceedings can vary depending on county practice, creditor claims, or competing heir positions. Knowing local rules and how to present evidence effectively can substantially influence the speed and outcome of a petition.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to correct the public record by declaring that property, although not formally transferred, should be treated as part of a trust. It is commonly used when a trustmaker intended to fund a living trust but did not complete a deed, assignment, or trustee designation before death. The petition explains the factual basis for the court to find that the property belonged to the trust, such as signing the deed in draft form, contemporaneous notes, or other instructions. The remedy provides clarity of title and allows trustees to administer assets according to the trust’s terms.
Successful petitions rely on clear documentary evidence and persuasive presentation. Typical elements include the trust instrument itself, any draft or signed deed, affidavits or declarations from witnesses, correspondence showing the trustmaker’s intent, and records of actions taken toward funding the trust. The process also requires notice to heirs and interested parties and handling any objections that arise. Courts look for a convincing chain of facts showing that the person intended the asset to be in the trust. Preparing a complete administrative record and anticipating possible challenges can reduce delays and improve the likelihood of a favorable ruling.
This glossary defines common terms encountered during Heggstad petitions and trust administration. Understanding these words helps trustees, beneficiaries, and family members follow the process and know what documents or evidence will be important. Terms include trust instrument, trustee, settlor, deed, probate, funding, and order confirming trust property, among others. Familiarity with these concepts aids informed decision making and clearer communication with counsel, title companies, and the court. When preparing a petition, assembling items that match these definitions strengthens the factual record presented to the court.
A trust instrument is the written document that creates the trust and sets out the settlor’s directions about management, distributions, and successor trustees. It identifies the trustee and beneficiaries and outlines how assets are to be handled both during the settlor’s life and after death. When pursuing a Heggstad petition, the trust instrument is central because it demonstrates the settlor’s intended beneficiaries and disposition rules. Clear, dated signatures and provisions that show the settlor intended particular property to be part of the trust enhance credibility and provide the foundation for the court’s review.
A deed is a legal instrument used to transfer real property from one owner to another. In the context of trust funding, deeds may be used to move title from an individual to a trustee. If a deed was prepared but never recorded, or if a deed lacks the necessary formality, a Heggstad petition can request a court order recognizing that the property was meant to be trust property. Supporting evidence such as a draft deed, signatures, related correspondence, or witness statements can help the court determine the settlor’s intent with respect to the deeded property.
A trustee is the individual or entity named in the trust to hold, manage, and distribute trust assets according to the trust’s terms. The trustee has fiduciary obligations to beneficiaries, including a duty to follow the trust document and to act in good faith. When property appears unrecorded, the trustee may file a Heggstad petition to establish authority over the asset. The trustee’s declarations, record of dealing with the property, and consistent steps taken toward funding the trust can be important evidence in convincing the court that the asset belonged to the trust.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering an estate when assets pass under a will or when there is no trust in place. Heggstad petitions are often used as an alternative for specific assets to avoid formal probate for those items, because the petition can result in an order recognizing the asset as trust property and thus subject to administration under the trust rather than probate. Avoiding probate can reduce public exposure of private details, cut some expenses, and speed the eventual distribution of assets to beneficiaries named in the trust.
Choosing between a Heggstad petition, a probate administration, or a quiet title action depends on the nature of the asset, the clarity of documentation, and the goals of the parties involved. A Heggstad petition specifically asks a probate court to treat an asset as belonging to a trust, which can be quicker and more focused than a full probate. Probate handles the entire estate under a will, while a quiet title action addresses disputes about property ownership for purposes of clearing title. Considering anticipated objections, creditor issues, and whether avoiding probate is a priority will guide which route best serves the family or trustee.
A narrowly tailored petition can be sufficient when there is persuasive documentation indicating that the trustmaker intended the specific asset to be part of the trust. Examples include a signed trust instrument referencing the asset, a draft deed with signatures or notations, and contemporaneous communications expressing the intent to fund the trust. When such evidence is available, a focused petition can obtain a judicial declaration for the particular property without initiating a full probate administration, which helps reduce time and expense while allowing the trustee to continue managing trust affairs as intended.
A limited Heggstad petition may be appropriate when there are few interested parties and the risk of contested objections is minimal. If beneficiaries and heirs are in agreement or there is a clear paper trail supporting the transfer, the court process can often proceed more smoothly. This situation reduces litigation risk and the need for broad discovery. Because courts also consider notice and due process, having cooperative parties and transparent documentation lowers the likelihood of adversarial hearings and can lead to a faster resolution that preserves the settlor’s intended plan for asset disposition.
A comprehensive approach becomes necessary when facts are disputed or multiple parties assert competing claims to the asset. Situations involving ambiguous documents, incomplete records, or parties with differing versions of events require thorough investigation, additional discovery, and careful litigation planning. In those circumstances, counsel may need to prepare more extensive declarations, depose witnesses, and address title company concerns. A broad strategy helps protect the trustee and beneficiaries by anticipating and responding to legal challenges while building the strongest possible factual narrative to present to the court.
When untransferred property is part of a larger set of estate planning complications, such as creditor claims, multiple trusts, or concurrent probate matters, a comprehensive plan helps coordinate outcomes across proceedings. Handling several assets or coordinating with ongoing probate cases may require a combined strategy that includes petitions, litigation, settlement negotiations, and title resolution steps. A broad approach reduces the risk of inconsistent rulings and can secure a cleaner path for administration and distribution across related matters, protecting beneficiaries’ interests in the longer term.
A comprehensive approach ensures that all relevant issues are identified and addressed, from clear title and creditor notifications to potential heir objections and tax implications. By preparing a full evidentiary record, trustees can reduce the chance that overlooked facts will later undermine a favorable ruling. Thorough preparation also supports smoother coordination with title companies and real estate professionals if deeds or transfers require correction after the court issues an order. Ultimately, this method aims to create durable results that align with the settlor’s plan and reduce future disputes.
Taking a broad view can also save time and expense over the long run by avoiding piecemeal litigation and repeated filings. Addressing interconnected matters at once reduces duplicative work, lowers the risk of inconsistent judgments, and helps trustees move forward with administration and distribution. A comprehensive strategy typically includes evaluating potential exposure to creditor claims, assessing notice requirements, and planning for title transfer mechanics post-order, which together facilitate a smoother transition of property into the trust and a clearer path to final distribution to beneficiaries.
By creating a complete record and addressing all foreseeable issues, a comprehensive approach lowers the probability that heirs or creditors can successfully reopen or contest the matter later. When courts see a carefully documented petition supported by declarations, contemporaneous evidence of intent, and adequate notice to interested parties, the resulting order is more likely to be durable. This forward-looking preparation helps trustees manage assets confidently and reduces the administrative burden caused by subsequent disputes, allowing beneficiaries to receive distributions as intended by the trustmaker.
A comprehensive legal effort often produces the clear title documentation that title companies require for property transactions. After a court order recognizing trust ownership, trustees can more readily sell, refinance, or distribute real property. Ensuring the post-order transfer mechanics are properly completed reduces the chance of delays when beneficiaries need liquidity or seek to transfer property. Clear title supports practical needs such as closing escrow and settling estate matters, making the overall administration process more efficient and reducing friction among family members.
Begin by collecting the trust document, any draft or recorded deeds, correspondence, bank records, and notes that show intent to fund the trust. Witness statements or declarations from individuals involved in the trustmaker’s planning can be particularly helpful. Title reports and property records may reveal whether a deed was filed or whether title remains in the decedent’s name. Having a complete set of verified documents before filing the petition helps the court evaluate the case promptly and reduces the need for supplementary filings or delays caused by missing evidence.
Provide notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties as required and be prepared to address any concerns they raise. Early communication can minimize objections and encourage resolution before contested hearings. If real property is involved, coordinate with a title company so that any post-order recording or title updates proceed smoothly. Alerting parties and third-party professionals early helps manage expectations and often streamlines the process of implementing a court order once the Heggstad petition is granted.
Consider a Heggstad petition when you discover property that was clearly intended to be moved into a living trust but remains titled in the decedent’s name. Acting promptly can prevent delays in administration and reduce the risk that creditors or unclear title issues will complicate distribution. The petition can provide a judicial declaration that restores the settlor’s plan and allows trustees to carry out trust provisions without resorting to full probate for that asset. This remedy is particularly useful when the trustmaker’s paperwork shows intent but a technical transfer step was missed.
You should also consider this service when beneficiaries seek clarity on ownership for purposes of sale, refinancing, or transfer to heirs. A Heggstad order can make it possible to complete real estate transactions and settle trust assets efficiently. If there is potential for family disagreement or competing claims, initiating a petition with thorough documentation helps establish a legal record early in the process. Taking this step can conserve estate assets and facilitate fair distribution according to the trust.
Typical scenarios include when a trustmaker prepared but did not record a deed transferring real estate to the trust, when funds intended for trust funding remained in personal accounts, or when title issues are revealed during estate settlement. Other circumstances include lost or misplaced transfer documents, ambiguous beneficiary designations, or administrative oversights at the time of a settlor’s death. Each of these situations can be addressed by a petition that presents evidence of intent and asks the court to confirm trust ownership for the affected assets.
A common circumstance is when a deed was drafted to transfer real property but was never recorded before the trustmaker’s death. This leaves title in the decedent’s name and can block the trustee’s ability to manage or distribute the property. A Heggstad petition presents the court with the draft deed, supporting communications, and witness declarations that demonstrate intent to transfer. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it may issue an order recognizing the property as trust-owned, enabling subsequent recording and administration under the trust.
Another frequent issue occurs when financial accounts intended to be moved into a trust remain titled in the settlor’s name at death. These accounts may require court action to permit the trustee to access funds for debts, taxes, or distributions. A Heggstad petition can be used to show that the accounts were meant to be trust property, supported by statements, beneficiary designations, or other documentation. Resolving account title issues through a court order helps trustees manage assets in accordance with the trust’s terms.
Administrative oversights, such as unsigned trustee acceptance forms, misplaced documents, or incomplete transfers, often lead families to seek legal relief. When paperwork is inconsistent or incomplete but the settlor’s intent is evident, the court can be asked to repair the record and recognize the trust ownership. Addressing these errors through a Heggstad petition reduces the need for full probate of particular assets and provides a clearer path for trustees to fulfill the trustmaker’s wishes without prolonged uncertainty or additional administrative barriers.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides local guidance for families and trustees in Berkeley and across Alameda County. We assist in evaluating whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, identifying the documentation that supports the filing, and preparing the petition and required notices. Our local knowledge of county procedures and court practices helps streamline the process. Clients receive straightforward advice about likely timelines, potential responses from interested parties, and next steps after a court order, including recording deeds and updating title records.
Our firm focuses on practical legal solutions for trust administration and estate planning matters, offering clear guidance through each stage of a Heggstad petition. We work with trustees and families to assemble persuasive evidence, prepare the required court filings, and coordinate service and notice to interested parties. Our goal is to secure orders that reflect the settlor’s intentions while minimizing delay and contention. Clients appreciate attention to detail and direct communication about what to expect from the process in Alameda County courts.
We emphasize efficient handling of documentation and careful preparation of declarations and pleadings tailored to local court practices. Where real property is at issue, we coordinate with title companies and provide guidance on post-order recording and title clearance. Our approach is designed to reduce uncertainty and help trustees move smoothly from petition to administration. We also assist with follow-up tasks, including transferring assets, updating trust records, and advising beneficiaries on next steps after the court’s decision.
Throughout the engagement, we keep clients informed about procedural timelines, potential objections, and available options to resolve disputes amicably when possible. When litigation becomes necessary, we prepare for hearings and present the factual record in a clear, organized manner. Families and trustees find value in having a single point of contact who understands both the legal requirements and the practical steps needed to conclude trust funding matters and restore clear title for trust assets.
Our process begins with an initial review to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and what evidence is available. We then gather documentation, draft the petition and supporting declarations, and prepare notice to interested parties. After filing, we address any procedural issues and respond to objections, aiming to present a clear factual narrative to the court. Once an order is obtained, we assist with any recording or title work necessary to complete the transfer into the trust. Throughout, we provide regular updates so clients understand progress and next steps.
The first step involves a detailed evaluation of the circumstances and collection of all relevant documents that demonstrate intent to fund the trust. We seek trust instruments, draft or recorded deeds, bank statements, relevant correspondence, and witness declarations. This stage also includes identifying all interested parties who must be notified and assessing potential objections or creditor concerns. By assembling a thorough evidence package at the outset, we prepare a focused petition that addresses likely questions and helps the court reach a timely decision.
We identify and organize key pieces of evidence that support trust ownership, including dated documents and witness statements. Witnesses who observed the trustmaker’s intent or handled draft deeds can provide declarations to the court. We also review property records and title history to determine current ownership status. Collecting this material early allows us to draft clear declarations that connect facts to legal standards, increasing the petition’s persuasiveness and reducing the likelihood the court will request additional proof or continuances.
We identify heirs, beneficiaries, and other potentially interested parties and prepare the required notices to ensure due process. Proper service is essential, and we manage the logistics of providing notice under California probate rules. This phase includes checking for known creditors and evaluating whether additional publication or alternative service methods may be required. Clear and timely notice helps prevent procedural challenges that could delay the petition and provides an opportunity for interested parties to raise concerns early in the process.
After assembling the record and preparing declarations, we file the Heggstad petition in the appropriate probate division of the county court. The filing includes the petition, supporting declarations, exhibits, and proof of service. We track court deadlines, calendars, and local filing requirements to ensure the matter proceeds without avoidable administrative delays. Once filed, the court will set a hearing date and provide an opportunity for interested parties to respond. We prepare for potential objections by anticipating common questions and developing rebuttal evidence.
Our petitions are drafted to present a concise, chronological narrative that ties documentary evidence to the legal standard for recognizing trust property. Exhibits are labeled and cross-referenced, and declarations explain the provenance of each document. Clear organization helps the court evaluate the petition efficiently and reduces the risk of requests for supplemental information. We also prepare a proposed order for the judge to consider, which can streamline the court’s decision-making process when the facts are clear and uncontested.
When objections arise, we review them carefully and prepare responses that address factual and legal points raised by other parties. This may involve submitting additional declarations, gathering rebuttal evidence, or negotiating resolutions to narrow disputed issues. Our goal is to resolve objections where possible through documentation or agreement, while being ready to present the court with a clear record if a hearing becomes necessary. Effective response management can significantly reduce time in court and increase the chances of a favorable result.
At the hearing, we present the assembled evidence and respond to any objections, asking the court to issue an order recognizing the property as trust-owned. If the court grants the petition, we assist with implementing the order by recording deeds, coordinating with title companies, and updating trust inventories. We also advise on next steps to distribute or manage the asset under the trust’s terms. Ensuring that post-order steps are completed properly closes the funding gap and helps trustees proceed with administration and distribution.
During the hearing, we focus the court’s attention on the critical evidence that establishes the settlor’s intent and the chain of events leading to the unrecorded transfer. Clear declarations, coherent timelines, and well-organized exhibits help judges assess the facts efficiently. We are prepared to address questions and explain the practical consequences of recognizing the property as trust-owned, including how it supports administration and distribution according to the trust document. A persuasive presentation at hearing often narrows the issues and facilitates the issuance of an order.
After obtaining a court order, we coordinate with title companies and county recorders to ensure that deeds or other documentation are properly recorded and that title reflects the trust’s ownership. This step is necessary for future transactions or distributions and prevents confusion later on. We provide guidance on how to present the order for recording, resolve any remaining title defects, and update trust inventories. Completing these administrative tasks closes the loop so trustees can manage or transfer the property without further procedural obstacles.
A Heggstad petition is a probate proceeding that asks a California court to treat an asset as part of a trust even though the formal transfer may not have been completed. It is commonly used when a trustmaker intended to place real property or other assets into a living trust but the deed, assignment, or retitling was not recorded before death. The petition lays out the facts and submits supporting documents to establish the settlor’s intent and the chain of events showing the asset was meant to be trust property. This petition focuses on declaring ownership for trust administration rather than settling the entire estate under probate. The court reviews the petition and evidence, provides notice to interested parties, and may hold a hearing. If the court is persuaded that the asset belonged to the trust, it can issue an order recognizing trust ownership, which can then be used to record corrected title or otherwise enable the trustee to manage the property under the trust’s terms.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies based on the county’s calendar, the completeness of the evidence, and whether objections are raised. In Alameda County, straightforward matters with clear documentation and cooperative interested parties can move through filing and hearing within a few months, but more complex or contested matters may take longer. Initial case preparation, document collection, and the court’s scheduling all influence the overall timeline. If objections arise, additional time will be needed for discovery, briefing, or hearings. Engaging counsel early to assemble a thorough record and plan for notice can help avoid unnecessary delays. Promptly addressing creditor notices and providing clear service to interested parties also reduces the risk of procedural setbacks that lengthen the process.
Courts typically prefer dated, contemporaneous documentation that ties the asset directly to the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Examples of persuasive evidence include the trust instrument itself, draft or executed deeds, correspondence reflecting instructions to transfer property, and declarations by witnesses who observed the settlor’s planning decisions. Bank or escrow records that show steps toward funding the trust may also be useful. Clear, organized exhibits that create a chronological record of intent strengthen the petition. Affidavits or declarations from the trustee or other individuals with direct knowledge can help connect the documentary evidence to the legal standard courts apply. The more concrete and consistent the supporting materials are, the easier it is for the judge to assess whether the property should be treated as trust-owned. Avoiding reliance on vague recollection and instead presenting verifiable documents increases the chance of a favorable ruling.
Whether heirs must appear in person depends on how the case proceeds and whether objections are filed. Interested parties are entitled to notice and the opportunity to respond; if an heir objects, they may choose to appear at a hearing or participate through counsel. In many uncontested cases, heirs accept the petition and a hearing may be brief or handled without live testimony, with the court relying on written declarations and exhibits. Counsel can often represent clients at hearings without requiring every interested party to be physically present, particularly when parties are represented by attorneys or submit written responses. Clear communication about notice requirements and scheduling helps families understand whether personal attendance will be necessary in their case.
A Heggstad petition addresses ownership of specific assets rather than serving as a comprehensive substitute for probate of an entire estate. It is useful when particular items intended for a trust were not formally transferred before death. By obtaining an order that recognizes those assets as trust property, trustees can manage and distribute them according to the trust. Other assets that are not the subject of the petition may still require separate administration through probate or other proceedings if they were not covered by the trust or other transfer mechanisms. When multiple assets are affected or when the estate contains complex liabilities, a combined strategy that includes petitions, probate filings, or settlement negotiations may be necessary. Evaluating all assets and creditor exposure at the outset helps determine whether additional proceedings are required beyond a Heggstad petition.
If an heir objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and may schedule additional hearings or discovery to resolve factual disputes. The objecting party must present reasons and evidence supporting their position, and the petitioner has the opportunity to respond with rebuttal evidence and legal argument. Many disputes can be resolved through clarification of the record or limited additional documentation, but some contested cases require live testimony or more extensive proceedings. When objections arise, parties may also pursue negotiated resolutions, such as stipulated orders or agreed settlements, to avoid prolonged litigation. Early and clear communication about the facts and a willingness to address legitimate concerns can reduce the scope of disagreement and lead to an outcome that preserves the settlor’s intent while accommodating valid claims.
Filing a Heggstad petition does not eliminate valid creditor claims against the estate, but it can affect how specific assets are administered. Creditors generally have a statutory window to present claims against the estate; if assets are treated as trust property, creditor rights may be affected depending on the circumstances and the timing of claims. It is important to assess outstanding liabilities and provide proper notice so that creditor concerns are addressed within applicable timelines. Trustees and heirs should evaluate potential creditor exposure before taking action and may need to coordinate the petition with ongoing creditor claim processes. Addressing creditor issues proactively helps reduce the risk of later disputes that could undermine the benefits of a successful petition.
A Heggstad petition seeks a probate court’s declaration that certain property should be treated as part of a trust based on the settlor’s intent, while a quiet title action is typically a civil lawsuit to resolve competing claims to real property and establish clear title for recording purposes. Heggstad petitions arise within probate procedures and focus on trust funding and administration, whereas quiet title actions may involve different legal theories and remedies focused on title disputes between private parties. Choosing between the two depends on the nature of the dispute, whether the trust instrument provides clear direction, and the desired remedy. When the primary issue is that an asset was intended to be in a trust but was not recorded, a Heggstad petition is often the appropriate and more direct path in California probate courts.
Yes, a court order granting a Heggstad petition generally provides the authority needed to record a deed or other instrument reflecting the trust’s ownership. Once the court declares that the property belonged to the trust, the trustee can use the order to complete any recording or title updates required by the county recorder’s office and title companies. Coordination with title professionals ensures the order is presented in the form they require for recording and clearing title. Occasionally, title companies ask for supplemental documentation or clarifications before issuing coverage. We help guide trustees through these post-order steps so recording proceeds smoothly and the property’s title is updated to reflect the trust’s ownership, enabling subsequent transactions or distributions without further procedural barriers.
To get started, gather available documents such as the trust instrument, any draft or executed deeds, correspondence, bank or escrow records, and contact information for potential witnesses. Call the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at 408-528-2827 or use the firm’s intake process to arrange an initial consultation to review your records and discuss next steps. An early assessment clarifies whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and what additional information will strengthen the petition. During the initial engagement, we outline the evidence needed, identify interested parties for notice, and explain likely timelines and potential outcomes. Prompt documentation and clear communication help move the matter forward efficiently and ensure trustees and families understand the process and their options at every stage.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas