A Heggstad petition can be essential when assets meant to fund a trust remain titled incorrectly after a trustmaker passes away. Residents of Dublin and Alameda County often face delays and added expense when bank accounts, deeds, or retirement plan distributions were not completed according to trust documents. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists families with petitions that ask the probate court to recognize that certain assets were intended to be trust property. This page explains how a Heggstad petition works, what evidence is helpful, and how the process typically unfolds in local courts so you can plan next steps with confidence.
Many estate plans in the Dublin area include revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related documents but still leave assets in a decedent’s name. When that occurs, a Heggstad petition provides a legal path to transfer those assets into the trust without a full probate administration in many cases. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman handles matters involving revocable living trusts, certification of trust, pour-over wills, and related filings. If you are managing a trust after a loved one died and discover accounts or property were not retitled, filing a Heggstad petition may resolve ownership cleanly and protect beneficiary interests.
A successful Heggstad petition can minimize delays and expenses that arise when assets do not bear the trust’s name at death. Instead of opening a probate estate, a petition asks the court to declare that specific property was always intended to belong to the trust or to a trustee. This approach can preserve the privacy and efficiencies that motivated creation of the trust in the first place, and it can help beneficiaries receive assets more quickly. For Dublin families, the petition is often a practical solution to common administrative gaps, protecting legacy goals while avoiding unnecessary court involvement.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout Alameda County from a client-centered practice focused on estate planning and trust administration. We work with trustees and family members to collect documentation, prepare filings, and present persuasive petitions to the probate court. Our team emphasizes clear communication, timely responses, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s needs. For residents of Dublin, San Jose, and across California, we bring local court familiarity and a track record of resolving funding issues efficiently while explaining options in plain language and helping clients make informed choices during an emotionally difficult time.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing used when an individual intended trust ownership but assets remain titled otherwise after death. The petition asks probate court to recognize the trust as the proper owner because the decedent manifestly intended the trust to receive the assets. This procedure can be appropriate for bank accounts, real property, retirement accounts with ambiguous beneficiary designations, and other assets that were overlooked when the trust was funded. Understanding how intent is proven, which documents are persuasive, and local filing practices is an important first step for trustees and family members confronting unfunded assets.
Filing a Heggstad petition requires assembling evidence that shows the decedent intended the trust to control the asset. Evidence can include the trust document, pour-over will, beneficiary forms, correspondence, or other indicia of intent. Courts evaluate the totality of the circumstances, and outcomes depend on the clarity of the evidence and the presence of interested parties. In Alameda County, local court procedures and timelines matter, so coordinating filings, service, and hearings correctly helps to avoid unnecessary delays. A careful, well-documented petition improves the chance of a favorable ruling and a smooth transfer of title into the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a request to the probate court to determine that property should be treated as trust property despite not being formally retitled before the trustmaker’s death. The petition explains why the asset was intended to be part of the trust and asks for an order to transfer title to the trustee or otherwise recognize the trust’s ownership. The process traces back to a California appellate decision that established courts can consider extrinsic evidence of intent when an asset remains outside the trust. The petition focuses on intent, documentation, and the interests of beneficiaries and creditors.
Preparing a petition generally involves identifying the specific assets, collecting supporting documents, drafting a clear statement of facts, and filing the petition with the probate court. Important elements include the trust instrument, related wills or pour-over provisions, account applications, beneficiary designations, correspondence, and any evidence of the trustmaker’s instructions. After filing, interested parties must be served and given notice. The court may schedule a hearing to review evidence and determine whether the asset qualifies for transfer to the trust. If the court grants the petition, orders are recorded and asset titles are updated accordingly.
This brief glossary defines terms that commonly appear in Heggstad petition matters so trustees and family members can follow the process. Understanding these terms helps when assembling documentation and communicating with the court. Key entries include definitions for the petition itself, pour-over wills, trusts, probate proceedings, and other items that influence the court’s decision. Clear definitions reduce confusion during an already difficult time and provide practical guidance on which records are most useful when pursuing a petition in Alameda County or other California jurisdictions.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to declare that certain property should have been, and therefore is, part of a decedent’s trust based on the decedent’s manifest intentions. It is used when assets were not retitled or were otherwise omitted from the trust after the trustmaker’s death. The petition relies on evidence of intent rather than formal title paperwork alone. Appropriate documentation and clear factual statements increase the likelihood the court will recognize the trust interest and permit transfer without a full probate estate administration.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs any assets remaining in a decedent’s name at death to be transferred into their trust. It operates as a safety net to capture assets that were not funded into the trust during the trustmaker’s lifetime. While a pour-over will may still trigger some probate procedures for assets not already in the trust, it supports the argument that the trustmaker intended the trust to receive remaining property and can therefore be persuasive evidence in a Heggstad petition.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which a person, known as the trustmaker, transfers assets to be managed by a trustee for the benefit of named beneficiaries. A revocable living trust is commonly used in estate planning to avoid probate, provide for incapacity planning, and manage distributions. For Heggstad petitions, the trust document itself often serves as central evidence of the trustmaker’s intent to have certain assets governed by the trust, and it helps courts determine whether a transfer order is appropriate.
Probate is the court-supervised process that administers a decedent’s estate, which can include validating a will, identifying assets and creditors, and distributing property to heirs and beneficiaries. When assets are properly titled in a trust, they can bypass probate administration, but unfunded assets may require probate unless a Heggstad petition or other remedy applies. Probate timelines and procedures vary by county; in Alameda County, initiating a Heggstad petition can sometimes avoid a full probate case and reduce costs and public disclosure tied to probate administration.
When assets are not in a trust at death, options include filing a Heggstad petition, opening a probate estate, or pursuing alternative transfers depending on the asset type and circumstances. A Heggstad petition can be quicker and more private than full probate if the evidence of intent is strong and there are no substantial disputes. Probate offers a comprehensive process for resolving all claims and distributing property, which is sometimes necessary. The best approach depends on asset values, creditor concerns, potential disputes among heirs, and local court practices in Alameda County and other affected jurisdictions.
A limited filing may suffice when the asset involved is of modest value and the trustmaker left clear, written evidence that the item was intended for the trust. Examples include a bank account with a signature card indicating trust ownership or a pour-over will combined with clear beneficiary instructions. In such cases, the court may grant a straightforward order transferring the asset into the trust without the need for a complex probate administration. This faster path can reduce legal fees and simplify settlement for beneficiaries.
When beneficiaries and other interested parties agree that the asset should belong to the trust, a limited petition can often resolve the matter quickly. Agreement among parties reduces the likelihood of contested hearings and lengthy litigation, allowing the court to rely on submitted documents and declarations rather than extended evidence presentation. Trustees should still present clear factual support and proper notice, but when opposition is unlikely, the streamlined route both preserves privacy and conserves family and court resources.
Comprehensive legal representation is often necessary when ownership is disputed, documentation is missing, or heirs disagree about the trustmaker’s intent. In those situations the matter may require a contested hearing where evidence is examined and witnesses may be called. A thorough approach includes locating historical records, preparing witness declarations, reviewing bank and property records, and crafting legal arguments to present a persuasive case to the court. When disputes arise, careful planning and formal pleadings help protect the trustee’s and beneficiaries’ interests and clarify the legal path forward.
If the decedent owned real property, investment accounts, retirement plans, or other assets across multiple jurisdictions, a comprehensive filing is often warranted. High-value assets increase the stakes and the scrutiny of interested parties, so assembling a complete evidentiary record and coordinating with out-of-county or out-of-state custodians may be necessary. A broad approach helps ensure that transfers are legally effective and that title, beneficiary designations, and tax considerations are handled correctly across all affected locations and institutions.
A comprehensive approach increases the likelihood the court will find in favor of the trust by presenting well-organized evidence and anticipating potential objections. Detailed documentation and targeted legal argumentation can prevent delays and reduce the risk of later challenges. For trustees, this means a clearer pathway to transferring title, settling beneficiary expectations, and finalizing trust administration more efficiently. Preparing thoroughly also helps ensure court orders are properly recorded with title companies and financial institutions to update records without repeated follow-up.
Beyond increasing the chance of a favorable ruling, a careful strategy helps preserve family relationships by clearly communicating steps and providing transparent updates to beneficiaries. It also reduces the risk that creditors or other claimants will exploit procedural gaps. By addressing evidentiary and procedural considerations up front, trustees can close the administration process with greater certainty and avoid recurring disputes. This practical attention to detail supports a smoother transition of assets into the trust and a more orderly distribution to beneficiaries.
One of the most important benefits of pursuing a Heggstad petition, when appropriate, is the potential to avoid a full probate administration. Avoiding probate can save time and reduce fees that would otherwise be paid to administer an estate. It can also keep sensitive financial details out of public court records. For families trying to wrap up affairs quickly and with minimal disruption, a successful petition can provide a focused legal remedy that transfers title into the trust and allows beneficiaries to receive their inheritance with less delay and less public disclosure than probate often entails.
Filing a carefully prepared petition helps courts honor the trustmaker’s documented intentions by reconciling the decedent’s written plan with assets that were not formally retitled. This alignment protects beneficiary rights and helps ensure distributions follow the trust’s terms. When courts recognize the trust as the rightful owner of the asset, trustees can manage and distribute property according to the trust instrument, preventing unintended outcomes that might arise if assets were instead processed through probate or inadvertently distributed outside the trust structure.
Begin by collecting the trust document, pour-over will, bank statements, deeds, beneficiary designation forms, account applications, and any correspondence showing the trustmaker’s intent. These items form the backbone of a petition and speed the drafting process. Institutional records such as bank signature cards, account opening forms, and property deeds often contain critical clues. The more complete the documentation you provide at the outset, the sooner a petition can be prepared and filed. Organized records also reduce the risk of surprises during court review or disputes with interested parties.
Probate rules and filing practices vary by county, and Alameda County has specific local rules and calendars that affect petition processing. Learn about filing requirements, service deadlines, hearing schedules, and recording procedures so that the petition proceeds without procedural delays. Properly formatted documents, timely proof of service, and adherence to local event calendars reduce the chance of continuances or additional requests from the court. Consulting with a firm familiar with local courts will streamline the process and avoid unnecessary setbacks during the petition’s review and hearing.
If you discover accounts, real property deeds, or other assets that remain titled in a decedent’s name despite a trust being in place, a Heggstad petition may be the most efficient remedy. It can prevent the need for full probate, speed distribution to beneficiaries, and preserve the privacy of trust administration. Trustees who want to fulfill the trustmaker’s intentions and reduce court involvement may find the petition aligns with their fiduciary duties while limiting public disclosure and administrative burdens compared with probate.
Other reasons to consider this service include the desire to minimize costs associated with estate administration, prevent family disputes by clarifying ownership, and correct clerical oversights that commonly occur when a trust is created but assets are not formally retitled. The petition process can also address inadvertent omissions of retirement account beneficiary forms or bank accounts that were not updated, enabling a more orderly transition of assets into the trust for distribution under the trust terms.
Common scenarios include a decedent who executed a revocable living trust but died before financial accounts or real estate could be retitled, accounts with beneficiary designations that are ambiguous, or situations where a pour-over will indicates intent but assets still require transfer. Human error, timing issues during a move, or changes in account paperwork can all leave assets outside the trust. When these omissions are discovered, trustees and family members often use a Heggstad petition to reconcile paperwork with the trustmaker’s documented plan.
It is common for bank accounts, brokerage accounts, or real estate to remain in a decedent’s name due to oversight or timing. When the trustmaker intended those assets to be controlled by their revocable trust, a Heggstad petition provides a mechanism to transfer title or recognize trust ownership. Trustees should identify and list every asset believed to belong to the trust, gather supporting documentation, and proceed with a petition that explains the omission and demonstrates the trustmaker’s intent to include those assets in the trust arrangement.
Sometimes retirement accounts or life insurance policies carry beneficiary designations that conflict with the trust or that were never updated to reflect the trustmaker’s intentions. In such cases, a petition can help clarify ownership and reconcile differences between account paperwork and the trust instrument. Courts will consider all relevant documents and evidence of intent when resolving conflicting beneficiary information, and a well-prepared petition can present that evidence in a coherent manner that supports recognition of the trust as the proper recipient.
There are many instances where the trustmaker clearly intended for assets to be governed by their trust but did not finish the administrative steps required to retitle property. This can happen due to illness, busy schedules, or misunderstanding of funding requirements. When intent is documented in the trust, will, or through contemporaneous communications, a Heggstad petition allows the court to consider those circumstances and order the transfer of assets to effectuate the trustmaker’s plan despite the incomplete paperwork.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists Dublin and Alameda County clients with Heggstad petitions, trust administration, and related estate planning matters. We handle revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, trust modifications, certification of trust, and filings such as Heggstad petitions and trust modification petitions. If you are a trustee or family member faced with unfunded assets or unclear title, contact our office at 408-528-2827 to discuss next steps. We provide practical guidance tailored to local court procedures and work to move matters forward efficiently.
Clients choose our firm because we focus on clear communication, thorough preparation, and practical solutions that reflect local court practices in Alameda County. We guide trustees through each stage of the petition process, from document collection to court presentation, and keep clients informed at every step. Our goal is to resolve funding issues with minimal disruption to family life while protecting beneficiary rights and reducing the need for prolonged court involvement. Responsiveness, careful case handling, and a preference for pragmatic outcomes are central to our approach.
We emphasize upfront planning and transparent fee discussions so trustees and family members know what to expect. The firm helps prepare petitions, coordinate service on interested parties, and assemble the supporting evidence that courts need to make decisions. By focusing on organization and completeness, we aim to shorten timelines and limit unnecessary follow-up work. Whether dealing with a single overlooked account or a complex mix of assets, our process is designed to move matters forward efficiently while addressing legal and practical considerations.
Local familiarity with courts in Alameda County and surrounding areas helps us anticipate procedural requirements and avoid common pitfalls that can delay petitions. We assist with recording orders, updating titles, and resolving residual administrative tasks after a court ruling. Trustees find value in having a single point of contact to manage communications with financial institutions, title companies, and beneficiaries. To discuss a potential Heggstad petition, call the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at 408-528-2827 for an initial conversation about your situation and the documents that will be most helpful.
Our process begins with a careful intake to identify the assets in question and gather the trust and related records needed to support a petition. We then analyze the evidence, prepare a petition tailored to the facts, serve interested parties according to court rules, and represent the trustee at any necessary hearings. After a favorable court order, we assist with recording and updating titles and coordinating with financial institutions to complete transfers. The approach is methodical and focused on achieving a clear transfer into the trust whenever possible.
The intake phase collects key documents such as the trust instrument, pour-over will, account statements, deeds, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence that shows the trustmaker’s intent. We review these materials to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and which assets can be addressed through the petition. Early identification of interested parties and potential objections allows us to develop a focused evidentiary strategy. Clear organization at this stage reduces the likelihood of delays and sets the foundation for a persuasive filing with the probate court.
Gathering complete and legible copies of the trust document, pour-over will, deeds, account applications, and beneficiary designations is critical. Institutions often retain historical records that clarify original account setups and signature cards. The more documentation we can review at the outset, the better we can assess the strength of the case and anticipate questions a judge may raise. This phase also includes obtaining declarations from persons who can attest to the trustmaker’s intent, which can be highly useful in support of the petition.
We create a detailed inventory of assets believed to belong to the trust and note title discrepancies, beneficiary designations, and any potential creditor issues. Identifying all interested parties, heirs, beneficiaries, and known creditors early ensures proper notice and reduces the risk of procedural problems. A clear map of assets and parties helps tailor the petition and supports the court’s ability to issue an effective order transferring title or otherwise recognizing the trust’s interest in the asset.
Once evidence is assembled, we draft a petition that explains the factual history, attaches supporting exhibits, and requests the court to recognize trust ownership. The filing package typically includes declarations, copies of relevant documents, and proposed orders for the judge. We follow Alameda County filing rules to ensure correctness and prepare proof of service forms so interested parties receive proper notice. Careful drafting reduces the likelihood of continuances and positions the case for efficient consideration at the scheduled hearing.
We compile documentary and testimonial evidence that demonstrates the trustmaker intended the asset to be part of the trust. This may include the trust document, pour-over will provisions, account opening forms, correspondence, and affidavits from persons who observed the trustmaker’s intent. Presenting a coherent narrative supported by contemporaneous records helps the court evaluate the petition on a full factual basis. Detailed Exhibits and clear declarations make it easier for the judge to reach a decision without unnecessary additional discovery or hearings.
Before and after filing, we coordinate notice and communications with beneficiaries, financial institutions, title companies, and other interested parties. Proper service and early outreach often reduce objections and facilitate administrative steps after a ruling. Working with account custodians to confirm records and with title companies to prepare for recording orders helps the court’s disposition translate quickly into updated ownership records. This coordination is an important practical step that supports a smoother transition for trustees and beneficiaries.
After filing and providing notice, the court will set a hearing to consider the petition. At the hearing, the judge reviews the submitted evidence and hears any objections. If the court approves the petition, it issues an order recognizing the trust’s interest or directing transfer to the trustee. Following the order, we assist with recording deeds, updating account titles, and submitting orders to institutions so assets are formally placed under the trust’s control. These final steps complete the funding process and allow trustees to administer assets pursuant to the trust terms.
At the scheduled hearing we present the court with the petition, supporting declarations, and exhibiting documents that demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent. We explain the factual background and respond to any questions from the judge or opposition from interested parties. While uncontested petitions may be resolved on the filed papers, contested matters require more extensive presentation. Representing trustees attentively at the hearing helps ensure the court has the context and documentation it needs to issue a clear and enforceable order.
Once the court issues a favorable order, the next steps include recording deeds, submitting the order to financial institutions, and updating account titles or beneficiary records as appropriate. We assist in preparing recording documents and communicating with banks, brokerages, and title companies so the court’s decision is reflected in public and institutional records. Completing these administrative items promptly ensures that the trust can manage and distribute assets without further procedural obstacles and confirms that the court’s ruling has practical effect.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used when property that should have been placed into a trust remains titled in a decedent’s name. The petition asks the probate court to recognize that the asset was intended to be a trust asset because of the trustmaker’s manifest intent. It is commonly used for bank accounts, deeds, or accounts with beneficiary designations that did not reflect the trust. The petition relies on documentary and testimonial evidence to show intent rather than formal retitling alone, and it can lead to an order transferring ownership to the trustee. This petition is used when the trustmaker clearly intended the asset to be controlled by the trust but the formal funding steps were not completed. Courts consider the totality of the evidence, which may include the trust instrument, pour-over will, account forms, correspondence, and sworn declarations from witnesses. The process aims to effectuate the trustmaker’s plan while avoiding a full probate administration when the facts support recognition of the trust’s interest.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies based on evidence complexity, notice requirements, and whether any party contests the petition. In uncontested cases with clear documentation and proper service, the matter can move fairly quickly through filing, notice, and hearing stages, often within a few months. When the court requires additional evidence or when interested parties request continuances, the process can take longer. Administrative tasks such as obtaining institutional records or preparing declarations also affect the overall timeline. In Alameda County specifically, court calendars and local procedures shape scheduling and hearing availability. Early attention to proof of service, clear exhibits, and compliance with local filing rules helps avoid delays. Working with a firm that understands local practices increases the likelihood of an efficient process and allows trustees to plan for likely timelines and required administrative steps after a ruling.
The most persuasive evidence typically includes the trust document, pour-over will, account opening forms, signature cards, beneficiary designations, and contemporaneous correspondence indicating the trustmaker’s intent. Declarations from individuals who witnessed the trustmaker express their wishes or who assisted with account set-up can strengthen the petition. Property deeds, escrow instructions, and financial institution records that show earlier attempts to fund the trust are also useful. The goal is to present a coherent factual narrative supported by documents and credible witness statements. Collecting and organizing this material ahead of filing makes the petition stronger and more efficient to prepare. If records are incomplete, efforts to obtain historical account records or statements from institutions can fill gaps. Detailed exhibit lists, properly authenticated copies, and concise declarations help the court understand the circumstances and make a ruling that recognizes the trust’s interest when the evidence supports it.
A Heggstad petition often allows trustees to avoid full probate for specific assets when the court finds that the trustmaker intended those assets to be held by the trust. However, whether probate is avoided depends on the asset type, the completeness of the evidence, and whether interested parties contest the matter. Some assets with complex title issues or competing claims may still require probate or additional proceedings to resolve creditor or heir claims. If preventing probate for certain assets is a priority, careful preparation of the petition and supporting records improves the odds of a favorable order. In some cases a combination of remedies, including limited probate proceedings for other assets, may be necessary. Courts evaluate each petition on its own facts, so outcomes vary according to the sufficiency of proof and the presence of disputes.
Interested parties typically include beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs who would inherit under intestate succession rules, known creditors, and any parties with recorded interests in the assets at issue. Proper service and notice to these parties is a procedural requirement so they have an opportunity to object or respond. The petition must include a list of interested parties and comply with court rules governing service methods and timing to avoid procedural defects that might delay the hearing. Local rules also require proof of service to be filed with the court before or at the hearing. Working through the list of potential interested parties early in the process helps ensure notices are sent correctly and on time. Clear communication with beneficiaries often reduces the chance of objections and helps the petition proceed smoothly.
Yes, creditors can object to a Heggstad petition if they believe the petition improperly bypasses creditor claims or alters priority of claims against the decedent’s assets. Timing for creditor claims is governed by probate law, and courts will consider whether the petition affects the ability of creditors to make claims. If creditor concerns are present, additional notice or procedural steps may be required to protect their rights and to address any potential outstanding obligations tied to the asset. Anticipating creditor issues during the petition preparation helps mitigate risks. Trustees should identify known creditors and assess potential exposures so the petition can include measures to inform or accommodate creditor interests. Addressing creditor concerns proactively reduces the chance of successful challenges and supports a smoother resolution of ownership questions.
Costs for a Heggstad petition depend on the complexity of the case, the amount of evidence to gather, whether the petition is contested, and local court filing fees. Some matters are relatively straightforward and incur modest legal fees and court costs, while contested or multi-asset cases require additional time for discovery, declarations, and hearings, which increases costs. Each matter is different, and the best way to understand likely fees is to discuss the specific facts and asset types with the firm handling the case. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we aim to provide clear fee estimates and discuss options for managing costs up front. We can explain how factors such as the need for institutional records, the number of interested parties, and potential disputes will influence the overall cost. Transparent fee conversations early in the process help clients make informed decisions about how to proceed.
If a Heggstad petition is denied, the court’s ruling will explain the reasons, which often relate to insufficient evidence of intent or unresolved disputes among interested parties. When a petition is denied, other legal paths may be available, including opening a probate estate for the asset, seeking alternative equitable remedies, or, if appropriate, filing an amended petition with additional supporting evidence. The precise next steps depend on the court’s findings and the interests of beneficiaries and creditors. Appeals or reconsideration may be options in certain cases, but each path has procedural and timing requirements. Prompt consultation after a denial helps determine whether additional evidence, settlement discussions, or other filings offer a viable path to resolve ownership and allow distribution consistent with the trustmaker’s objectives.
A Heggstad petition may address out-of-state assets in some circumstances, but jurisdictional and choice-of-law issues can complicate the process. Real property located outside California is often governed by the law of the state where the property is located, and courts in other states may require separate filings or different procedures to change the title. For financial accounts held in institutions outside the state, custodian policies and local rules will affect how transfers are handled after a court order. When out-of-state assets are involved, coordination with counsel licensed in the relevant jurisdictions or cooperation with local counsel may be necessary. We evaluate the specific assets, their locations, and applicable law to advise whether a Heggstad petition in Alameda County can resolve the matter or whether complementary filings in other jurisdictions are required to effectuate transfers.
To start the process with our firm, call the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at 408-528-2827 to schedule an initial discussion about your situation. During that call we will ask for an overview of the assets in question, the existence of a trust or will, and any immediate deadlines or creditor concerns. We will explain what documents are most helpful for an initial assessment and outline the steps involved in preparing and filing a petition with the probate court. For the initial meeting, bring copies of the trust document, pour-over will, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, and any correspondence that shows the trustmaker’s intent. If you do not have copies, we can discuss methods for obtaining necessary records. This intake allows us to estimate likely timelines and costs and to recommend a course of action tailored to your circumstances.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas