A trust modification petition can be the right path when circumstances change, when trust terms no longer reflect the trustor’s intentions, or when ambiguities create disputes among beneficiaries. Residents and property owners in Emeryville and the surrounding Alameda County area often turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for careful, practical guidance on petitions to modify trusts. We handle matters involving revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, Heggstad petitions, and other estate planning documents. If you are considering changes to a trust or need help resolving disagreements about trust administration, a petition may help achieve a lawful and durable solution tailored to your family and assets.
A petition to modify a trust in California can involve both informal amendments, agreed restatements, and formal court proceedings when parties do not agree or when a trust document is unclear or unlawful in part. The process typically begins with a detailed review of the trust and related documents, followed by outreach to interested persons and, if necessary, filing a petition in the appropriate court. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful documentation, and practical resolution strategies to minimize delays and reduce the risk of future disputes while ensuring that changes comply with California law and the trustor’s overall intent.
Modifying a trust can protect assets, clarify administration, and reflect changed family or financial circumstances. Benefits include updating trustee appointments, adapting distributions to new relationships or needs, correcting drafting errors, and aligning the trust with current tax or benefits considerations. When handled properly, a modification secures the trustor’s intent and reduces the chance of costly litigation later on. Choosing the right process—informal amendment, restatement, or court petition—depends on the trust language and whether beneficiaries and trustees agree on the proposed changes. Thoughtful planning and accurate legal filings help protect the trust’s integrity and the interests of all involved parties.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across San Jose, Emeryville, and the broader California Bay Area with a focus on estate planning and trust administration. Our practice handles a broad range of trust-related matters, including revocable living trusts, irrevocable trusts, trust modification petitions, Heggstad petitions, and trust certification. We work closely with clients to review documents such as wills, advance health care directives, power of attorney forms, and related trust instruments. The firm prioritizes clear communication, practical guidance, and steady support to help clients navigate the legal process and make informed decisions about trust changes and administration.
A petition to modify a trust is a court filing used when a trust cannot be changed informally, when parties disagree about terms, or when the trust contains errors or ambiguities that require judicial clarification. California law allows for a variety of remedies, including reformation for mistake, modification by agreement of parties, and petitions to resolve questions about trust validity, interpretation, or administration. The goals of a petition vary: to correct unintended language, to adapt to changed circumstances, or to obtain an order that permits a particular action that the trust document does not clearly authorize. Filing a petition initiates a legal process that involves notice, possible objections, and a hearing.
When assessing whether to file a petition, the court will consider the trust’s language, the trustor’s intent, whether the trustor is alive or deceased, and whether beneficiaries or trustees consent to the proposed change. In some situations, beneficiaries can agree to a modification without court involvement if the trust allows it. In other cases, especially when parties dispute the change or when the trust terms are unclear, a petition brings the issue before a judge who can issue binding directions. The process requires careful factual development, supporting declarations, and compliance with California procedural rules to protect all parties’ interests.
A trust modification petition is a legal request to the court asking for an order to change, clarify, or interpret a trust instrument. It can address issues such as correcting a drafting mistake, resolving ambiguities, approving an agreement among interested persons, or authorizing actions the trust does not clearly permit. The petitioner must provide the court with factual background, the disputed language or problem, and why the requested change aligns with the trustor’s intent or with legal requirements. Courts may require notice to all interested persons and give beneficiaries an opportunity to object before issuing a final order that becomes part of the trust record.
Key elements of a petition include a clear statement of the requested relief, the trust document and relevant attachments, declarations supporting the factual basis for the request, and proof of notice to interested parties. The process typically involves document review, outreach to beneficiaries and trustees, drafting and filing the petition, serving required notices, responding to objections, and attending hearings. Evidence such as communications, account statements, or medical records may be used to demonstrate changed circumstances or a mistake in the original document. Effective petitions present both the factual record and legal authority in a way that enables the court to grant orderly and durable relief.
Understanding common terms helps clients navigate the petition process with greater confidence. Important concepts include trustor or settlor, beneficiary, trustee, reformation, Heggstad petition, pour-over will, and terms related to notice and jurisdiction. Knowing these definitions clarifies what actions are possible outside of court and which require judicial approval. Clear definitions also help when communicating with family members and trustees and when assembling documentation to support a petition. This glossary is designed to make the legal language more accessible so you can make informed decisions about whether a petition to modify a trust is appropriate.
A trust modification petition is a formal court filing requesting an order to change, reform, or interpret an existing trust. The petition sets out the reasons for the requested relief, attaches the trust instrument, and provides supporting declarations and evidence. Courts consider whether the requested change conforms with the trustor’s probable intent, whether the trust contains a mistake, and whether notice to interested persons has been properly given. A successful petition results in a court order that clarifies or modifies the trust document and becomes a part of the trust record, reducing uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries.
The trustor or settlor is the person who established the trust and transferred assets into it. This individual’s intent is central to most petitions to modify a trust; courts seek to honor that intent when interpreting, reforming, or correcting trust terms. When the trustor is alive but incapacitated, petitions may be necessary to address changed circumstances or to obtain court approval for certain actions. If the trustor is deceased, petitions may focus on interpretation or disputes among beneficiaries over the trustor’s intended distribution or administrative instructions.
A beneficiary is any person or entity entitled to receive benefits or distributions from a trust under its terms. Beneficiaries have important rights in trust modification proceedings, including the right to notice of filings and the right to object to proposed modifications that may affect their interests. California law provides mechanisms to protect beneficiary rights, including requirements for service of the petition and opportunities to be heard. Understanding beneficiary rights helps parties evaluate whether an out-of-court agreement is feasible or whether a judicial resolution is necessary.
A Heggstad petition is a specific type of court filing used to have property transferred to a trust by beneficiaries or other parties when the property title remains outside the trust at the trustor’s death. The petition asks the court to order the transfer so that the trust administration can proceed as intended. This procedure is commonly used when assets were unintentionally left out of the trust or when title issues arise during estate settlement. A Heggstad petition helps align actual asset ownership with the decedent’s plan as reflected in the trust instrument.
There are multiple ways to change a trust depending on the situation. If the trustor is alive and the trust permits, an amendment or restatement can often be made without court involvement. When all interested parties consent, a written agreement may accomplish the change. When the trust language is unclear, contains a mistake, or parties cannot agree, a court petition provides a binding resolution. Each option has trade-offs in cost, time, and finality. Informal approaches can be quicker and less expensive, but formal petitions create court orders that reduce future disputes and provide enforceable clarity.
A limited amendment is often sufficient for routine updates such as changing contact information, replacing a trustee due to relocation, or updating banking instructions tied to the trust. These types of changes commonly arise from practical needs and can usually be handled without formal court involvement when the trustor is capable and the trust permits amendments. Clear written documentation and communication with trustees and beneficiaries help prevent later disagreements. When all affected parties agree and the language of the trust allows it, straightforward administrative updates may proceed by amendment or restatement.
When beneficiaries and trustees are in alignment about a modest change, such as reallocating a small asset or clarifying a beneficiary designation, an out-of-court agreement can be an effective approach. This route avoids court expense and can preserve family relationships when parties negotiate in good faith. Proper documentation is essential: agreements should be written, signed, and, when appropriate, notarized and attached to the trust record. Even for small changes, preserving a clear paper trail ensures that future administrators understand the parties’ intentions and helps prevent disputes down the road.
When beneficiaries or trustees disagree about the meaning of trust provisions, when there are competing claims to assets, or when a trust contains ambiguous language that cannot be resolved informally, a court petition is often necessary to secure a definitive resolution. Litigation may be needed to protect the rights of parties, to reform the trust for a drafting mistake, or to determine whether certain actions are permitted. A comprehensive legal approach prepares a clear factual record and legal argument so the court can issue a binding order that reduces the likelihood of continued conflict.
If there are concerns about the trustor’s capacity, or allegations of fraud or undue influence surrounding trust formation or amendment, the matter often requires judicial review. Courts assess capacity standards, review evidence of the circumstances surrounding trust changes, and may decide whether to set aside a provision or reform the document. Protecting vulnerable individuals and ensuring the trust accurately reflects the trustor’s true intentions may require formal filings and court hearings where evidence is presented and evaluated under California law.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification reduces uncertainty, protects beneficiary rights, and helps prevent future litigation by creating a clear, court-approved record when needed. It includes thorough document review, careful notice to interested persons, and preparation of supporting evidence to show why a change is lawful and consistent with the trustor’s intent. This thoroughness can streamline administration, promote predictable outcomes, and provide a durable resolution where informal agreements would leave unresolved questions or create openings for future disputes.
Comprehensive handling also anticipates tax, creditor, and benefits impacts that might accompany changes to a trust. By evaluating the full legal and financial context—retirement plan trusts, irrevocable life insurance trusts, special needs trusts, and Heggstad petitions, among others—the process aims to harmonize the trust document with the rest of the estate plan. Early coordination among trustees, beneficiaries, and advisors helps implement modifications that work in practice and minimize unintended consequences for income, estate tax exposure, or public benefits eligibility.
A comprehensive approach focuses on documenting intent, providing required notices, and securing any necessary court orders to minimize ambiguity. Court-approved modifications and formally documented agreements reduce the potential for later disagreements that can drain assets and relationships. Clarity in the trust terms and a transparent record of actions taken provide trustees and beneficiaries with a clear roadmap for administration, reducing litigation risk and protecting the trust’s purpose over the long term.
Comprehensive modifications address title issues, transfer instructions, and trustee powers to ensure assets are managed and distributed according to the plan. This includes coordinating documentation such as certifications of trust, assignments to trust, and court orders from Heggstad or similar petitions that align actual asset ownership with the trust instrument. Clear directives protect trustees from liability when they act in reliance on a court order or properly documented modification, and they help ensure beneficiaries receive intended benefits in an orderly manner.
Begin by assembling the trust instrument, any amendments or restatements, recent account statements, deeds, beneficiary designations, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and related correspondence. Having these documents ready speeds the review and helps identify whether a court petition is needed. A complete file lets the attorney assess title issues, spot drafting errors, and determine whether beneficiaries were properly notified of prior changes. Early document gathering also preserves records that might be relevant to demonstrating the trustor’s intent or to show the chain of ownership for contested assets.
Mediation or negotiated agreements among beneficiaries and trustees can often resolve disputes more quickly and affordably than contested court proceedings. Alternative dispute resolution can preserve family relationships and produce flexible solutions tailored to particular needs. However, when parties cannot agree or when statutory protections are at issue, a court petition may be required to obtain a final resolution. Evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of negotiated settlement versus a court-ordered modification with attention to enforceability, permanence, and the level of protection needed for all parties.
Consider filing a petition when the trust no longer reflects the trustor’s intent due to life changes such as marriage, divorce, births, deaths, or substantial changes in assets. Other reasons include correcting drafting errors, resolving ambiguous instructions, clarifying trustee powers, or aligning asset titles with the trust. Disputes among beneficiaries or concerns about the trustor’s capacity at the time of a change also justify court involvement. The petition process provides judicial clarity and can produce enforceable orders that guide trustees and protect beneficiaries.
You may also need a petition when important assets were omitted from the trust, requiring a Heggstad petition or similar remedy to transfer property into the trust for proper administration. Additionally, when public benefits, tax planning, or creditor issues could be affected by a modification, the formal process ensures changes are legally defensible. If any party objects or if the trust’s language is unclear, a petition gives the court the authority to make binding decisions that minimize future uncertainty and protect the estate plan’s overall purpose.
Common circumstances include discovery of drafting mistakes, disputes over trustee conduct or beneficiary entitlements, omission of assets from the trust, and changes in family circumstances that materially affect intended distributions. Additional reasons are conflicts about trustee appointment, concerns about capacity or undue influence, and the need to clarify administrative powers or distribution timelines. Each situation requires careful fact-gathering and legal assessment to determine whether an informal amendment is adequate or whether a court petition is the most reliable path to resolution.
Drafting errors and omissions are frequent reasons for petitions. These may include incorrect beneficiary designations, missing signatures, or assets that were intended to be included but remain titled outside the trust. A petition can ask the court to reform or correct the document to reflect the trustor’s real intent and to align asset ownership with the trust. Proper evidence and supporting declarations are required to show that a correction is consistent with the trustor’s intent, which helps protect the trust from future challenges and ensures proper distribution of assets.
Disagreements among beneficiaries or between beneficiaries and trustees about interpretation or administration can impede trust management and distributions. When parties cannot agree, a petition brings disputed issues to the court for resolution. The court can issue orders clarifying duties, approving or denying proposed changes, and providing a framework for administration going forward. Judicial intervention can stabilize the situation, ensuring that trustee decisions are defensible and that beneficiaries receive clarity about their rights under the trust.
Life events such as remarriage, births, deaths, or significant changes in assets may require modification to ensure the trust reflects current circumstances. When the trustor cannot or did not update the trust during life, beneficiaries or trustees may need the court’s assistance to implement changes consistent with the trustor’s likely intent. A petition helps tailor the trust to new realities while documenting the legal basis for the modification, which aids trustees in administering the trust and helps protect beneficiaries from future claims.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides assistance to Emeryville and Alameda County residents seeking trust modifications or court petitions. We help clients assess whether an informal amendment, a negotiated agreement, or a court petition is the best approach, and we provide hands-on support with document preparation, notice, and hearings. Call our office at 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation, review trust documents such as revocable living trusts or pour-over wills, and determine the most effective path to resolve trust concerns and protect the trustor’s intentions and beneficiaries’ interests.
Our firm focuses on practical, client-centered solutions for estate planning and trust administration matters. We assist with a broad range of documents, including revocable living trusts, irrevocable life insurance trusts, retirement plan trusts, special needs trusts, and pet trusts, and we bring that full-plan perspective to trust modification petitions. Clients benefit from careful document review, thorough preparation of petitions and supporting evidence, and proactive communication with trustees and beneficiaries to reduce surprises and promote resolution.
When court action is required, we provide diligent handling of filings, service, and hearings, working to present a clear factual narrative and legal justification for the requested relief. We emphasize transparent cost estimates and timelines so clients can make informed choices about negotiation, mediation, or litigation. Our approach seeks durable outcomes that align with the trustor’s intent while managing the legal complexities that arise in contested trust matters in California courts.
The firm also assists with complementary estate planning tasks that often accompany trust modifications, such as preparing certification of trust, pour-over wills, Heggstad petitions, guardianship nominations, and advance health care directives. Coordinating these documents helps ensure the overall estate plan functions as intended after any trust modification. For a consultation or to begin a review of your trust and related documents, please contact our office and we will outline the practical steps to move forward.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust and related estate planning documents, followed by a strategy meeting to identify objectives and possible approaches. We document the factual basis for any requested change, communicate with interested persons to explore resolution, and prepare well-supported petitions when court intervention is necessary. We prioritize timely notice, accurate supporting declarations, and careful attention to procedural requirements so that proceedings move efficiently and yield clear, enforceable results that reflect the trustor’s intent and protect beneficiary interests.
The first stage focuses on gathering all relevant documents, reviewing the trust instrument and any amendments, and identifying stakeholders. This review identifies whether an amendment is possible or whether a petition is needed, and it uncovers any title issues, missing assets, or potential disagreements. The assessment includes practical considerations such as timing, potential costs, and likely outcomes so clients can make an informed decision about moving forward with negotiation, mediation, or formal court action.
We assemble the trust instrument, prior wills, powers of attorney, account statements, deeds, and any evidence that bears on the trustor’s intent. This factual record supports a petition or an out-of-court agreement. The legal analysis then examines statutory and case law relevant to the requested modification, including grounds for reformation or correction for mistake, and assesses the likelihood of success for different strategies under California law.
Early outreach to trustees and beneficiaries seeks to identify areas of agreement and to surface objections that could affect strategy. Clear communication can prevent escalation and sometimes results in a negotiated solution that avoids court. When parties are receptive, we attempt to document agreements in writing. When there are disputes or unresolved issues, outreach helps frame the factual narrative and prepare for necessary legal filings and notices required by the court.
When court action is required, we prepare a petition that sets out the facts, legal grounds, and the exact relief requested. Supporting declarations and exhibits supply the factual basis for the court’s decision. We ensure that the petition complies with local rules and includes all necessary attachments, such as the trust instrument and certificate of trust if appropriate. Proper preparation reduces the chance of procedural delays and helps the court understand the requested relief and its justification.
Filing the petition involves completing the correct forms, attaching required documents, and paying filing fees. Depending on the county, additional procedural requirements such as proof of service, declarations regarding attempted notice, and proposed orders may be required. Accurate filings and well-organized exhibits make the petition easier for judges to review and increase the likelihood of efficient scheduling of hearings and prompt rulings.
After filing, the petition must be served on interested persons, who then have the opportunity to object or respond. We manage the service process and prepare responses to objections when they arise. Addressing objections through negotiation, supplemental filings, or evidentiary submissions helps resolve contested issues and may lead to settlement before a hearing. If the matter proceeds, we use the factual record and legal arguments to present a clear case at hearing.
At the hearing, the judge reviews the petition, any objections, and the supporting evidence before issuing an order. The order may grant the requested modification, require changes, or deny relief. If the court issues an order, we assist with implementing it by updating trust records, preparing certified documents for asset transfers, and making any necessary filings with financial institutions or county recorders. Implementing the court’s order ensures the trust functions according to the court’s directive and the trustor’s intent.
Preparation includes organizing exhibits, preparing witness declarations, and outlining key legal points for the judge. We rehearse testimony and ensure all supporting documents are complete and admissible. Effective preparation helps the court quickly grasp the factual and legal issues at stake, which improves the likelihood of a clear, enforceable ruling. We also coordinate with opposing parties and the court clerk to schedule hearings and comply with local courtroom procedures.
Once the court issues an order, we assist in translating that order into practical actions: updating trust records, filing certified orders with relevant institutions, and preparing any deeds or assignments required to transfer assets into the trust. We also advise trustees on implementing the order while minimizing tax and benefits impacts. Ensuring that the court’s direction is properly executed helps complete the modification process and secures the trust’s revised structure for future administration.
A petition to modify a trust is a formal request submitted to the court asking for an order to change, clarify, or reform a trust document. It is typically necessary when the trust contains ambiguities, mistakes, or terms that no party can implement without judicial guidance, or when parties disagree about how the trust should be administered. The petition lays out the factual background, legal basis for the requested relief, and specifies the precise modification sought so the court can evaluate whether the change aligns with the trustor’s intent and applicable law. Filing a petition becomes the practical option when informal amendments are not feasible or when beneficiaries object to a proposed change. The court process provides a binding resolution and ensures that all interested persons receive notice and an opportunity to be heard. The result, if the petition is granted, is a clear court order that guides trustees and beneficiaries and helps prevent future disputes about the trust’s terms or administration.
Yes, a trust can often be modified without going to court when the trustor is alive and the trust contains an amendment clause or when all interested parties agree in writing to a change. In those situations, an amendment or restatement can be prepared and executed to reflect the new terms. When the trustor is capable, informal changes are frequently the quickest and least costly option. Proper documentation of the amendment and communication with trustees and beneficiaries reduces the risk of later challenges. However, when the trustor cannot amend the trust, beneficiaries disagree, or the trust contains mistakes or illegal provisions, a court petition may be required to obtain an enforceable resolution. In such circumstances, the petition process ensures notice, allows objections to be heard, and results in a judicial order that clarifies the trust’s terms and protects the parties’ interests going forward.
To support a petition to reform a trust for mistake, factual evidence demonstrating the drafting error and the trustor’s actual intent is essential. This can include contemporaneous communications, draft documents, witness statements, correspondence with the person who prepared the trust, and other records showing the trustor’s intent at the time the trust was executed. Declarations from people familiar with the circumstances and documentary evidence that contradicts the existing language help establish the basis for reformation. Legal argument demonstrating that the mistake was mutual or resulted from a drafting error, coupled with factual proof of the intended provision, is used to persuade the court to reform the instrument. Courts carefully evaluate such claims to ensure the proposed correction reflects what the trustor truly intended and does not unfairly prejudice interested persons, so thorough documentation and credible testimony are critical.
The timeline for a trust modification petition in Alameda County varies depending on the complexity of the matter, the court’s calendar, and whether parties object. Simple, uncontested matters can sometimes be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months if all notices and filings proceed smoothly. Contested petitions that require multiple hearings, discovery, or substantial evidentiary submissions can take many months or longer. Local court procedures and the need to coordinate notice to numerous interested persons also affect timing. Early case assessment and proactive communication with interested parties can shorten the timeline by resolving objections or narrowing issues before court hearings. Scheduling a consultation to discuss the specifics of your situation helps provide a more accurate estimate of likely timing given the facts, the number of parties involved, and the court’s procedural requirements.
Costs associated with filing a petition include court filing fees, process service charges, and attorney fees for document preparation, factual investigation, and court appearances. If parties negotiate a settlement, costs may be limited to preparation and documentation expenses. When litigation is required, attorney fees can increase depending on the level of dispute, the need for witness declarations, and preparation for hearings. Clients should receive an estimate of likely costs after an initial review of the case’s scope and complexity. Additional expenses may include costs for obtaining certified documents, title work or property records, and fees for experts or investigators if needed to support the factual record. We discuss budgeting options and try to identify cost-effective paths such as mediation or limited-scope filings when appropriate to reduce expense while pursuing durable results.
Yes. California procedural rules typically require that interested persons, including beneficiaries and trustees, receive notice of a petition to modify a trust. This notice gives those individuals the opportunity to review the petition and to file responses or objections. Proper service and proof of notice are essential elements of the petition process; failure to give required notice can result in procedural delays or jeopardize the validity of any order entered by the court. Providing timely and accurate notice also helps prevent surprise and can encourage voluntary resolution of disputes. We manage the notice and service process to ensure compliance with court rules and to document service in a way that supports the petition and reduces procedural vulnerability.
A Heggstad petition is used when property that should have passed to a trust remains in the name of an individual after the trustor’s death. The petition asks the court to recognize that certain assets should be treated as trust property so that they can be distributed according to the trust instrument. This remedy is commonly employed when deeds or account titles were not properly transferred into the trust during the trustor’s life, and it facilitates the trust administration process by aligning asset ownership with the decedent’s estate plan. Using a Heggstad petition helps trustees avoid prolonged delays in distributing assets and provides a judicial mechanism to correct title discrepancies. The petition requires sufficient evidence that the decedent intended the omitted property to be part of the trust, and the court’s order provides the record needed by financial institutions or county recorders to effect transfers.
Disputes between beneficiaries often begin with exchange of positions, attempts at negotiation, or mediation before reaching a court hearing. Mediation can be effective at finding compromises that preserve family relationships and reduce legal costs. When mediation fails, the petition process allows the court to evaluate evidence and issue an enforceable order based on the trust instrument and the trustor’s likely intent. The court’s intervention provides a definitive resolution where amicable settlement is not possible. Resolving disputes efficiently requires careful factual development, clear legal argument, and compliance with procedural rules for notice and evidence. We work to identify common ground early, propose realistic settlement options when appropriate, and prepare persuasive petitions and responses when litigation is necessary so the court can reach a prompt and sustainable decision.
Yes. A petition can request removal or replacement of a trustee when there are valid grounds such as breach of fiduciary duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or inability to effectively administer the trust. The petition should document the underlying reasons and propose a suitable successor or an interim plan for administration. Courts consider the best interests of the trust and beneficiaries, and will order removal only when justified by the record and consistent with the trustor’s intent and legal standards. When trustee removal is contested, the process may require detailed factual evidence and court hearings. We help clients assess alternatives such as trustee resignation, negotiated replacement, or court-ordered removal, and we prepare the necessary documentation to support the requested relief while aiming to minimize disruption to trust administration.
After the court issues an order modifying a trust, the order becomes part of the trust record and provides binding direction to trustees and beneficiaries. Implementation may involve updating the trust document, preparing certified copies of the order for banks or title companies, recording deeds to transfer real property, and adjusting account ownership. Trustees should act in accordance with the court’s instructions and ensure that any transfers or changes comply with institutional procedures and the order’s terms. We assist clients with implementing the court’s order, coordinating with financial institutions and county recorders, preparing any necessary deeds or assignments, and advising trustees on administration steps that minimize tax or benefits impacts. Proper execution of the court’s direction finalizes the modification and helps secure the trust’s intended operation going forward.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas