A Heggstad petition is a legal filing used to transfer assets that were intended to be placed into a trust but were left in an individual’s name when the trust maker died. This petition asks the court to treat those assets as if they had been transferred to the decedent’s trust during their lifetime, based on the decedent’s clear intent and supporting documentation. Many families use a Heggstad petition to avoid delay and confusion that can arise with assets that were meant to pass through a trust but did not receive proper retitling. The petition process involves gathering records, drafting declarations, and presenting proof of intent to the court.
At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help families in Fairview and the surrounding areas navigate Heggstad petitions and related trust matters. Our office, located in the San Jose area and serving clients across Alameda County and greater California, assists with document review, preparation of the required legal filings, and representation at hearings when needed. Call 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation and learn how a Heggstad petition might resolve title issues for assets intended for a trust. We aim to provide clear guidance, practical steps, and careful attention to your family’s goals and timing.
A Heggstad petition can be an effective way to honor a decedent’s intent to fund a trust without having to open a traditional probate proceeding for every mis-titled asset. When the court recognizes that certain assets should be treated as trust property, those assets can be transferred more efficiently to the trust for distribution according to the trust terms. The process can reduce administrative delay, lower some costs, and provide a clearer path for beneficiaries to receive their intended inheritance. Families benefit from the certainty and alignment with the deceased’s documented plan, while avoiding unnecessary complications and extended estate administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services to individuals and families across California, including matters related to Heggstad petitions. Our team brings many years of practice in trust law, probate avoidance strategies, and estate administration, focusing on clear communication and thorough documentation. We guide clients through the steps needed to present a persuasive record to the court and to complete asset transfers with minimal disruption. Whether you need assistance drafting supporting declarations, compiling records, or representing your interests at a hearing, our office is prepared to provide attentive legal service tailored to your family’s objectives.
A Heggstad petition seeks judicial recognition that assets left in a decedent’s individual name were intended to be trust property at the time of death. The petition typically relies on trust documents, declarations from the trustee or person who prepared the trust, and other evidence showing intent to fund the trust. Courts evaluate the totality of the documentation and circumstances to determine whether the property should be treated as trust assets. This remedy is commonly used for bank accounts, real property, or other assets that were overlooked during trust funding, and it can be an important tool to align asset titles with estate planning objectives.
Filing a Heggstad petition requires careful preparation of legal pleadings and supporting materials that demonstrate intent and contemporaneous actions pointing toward trust funding. Evidence may include trust instruments, trust funding checklists, transfer documents, correspondence, beneficiary designations, or witness declarations. The process often involves reviewing the decedent’s estate plan as a whole to confirm that the contested asset was meant to be part of the trust. Even when the facts favor the petition, the court’s decision depends on how well the evidence is organized and presented, which makes careful legal preparation important for a favorable result.
A Heggstad petition takes its name from a California case addressing the transfer of assets into trust after the trustmaker’s death when formal retitling had not occurred. The petition asks the probate court to deem certain property as part of the trust because the decedent intended those assets to be trust property. This is not an automatic remedy; it requires establishing intent and presenting a convincing record. The remedy is useful for preserving the efficiency and privacy benefits of trusts when simple errors or oversights prevented proper funding. Successful petitions restore intended asset flow and can minimize the need for full probate administration.
Critical elements of a Heggstad petition include a clear trust instrument, documentation or testimony showing that the decedent intended the item to be in the trust, and contemporaneous or explanatory evidence such as deeds, account statements, or drafting notes. The legal process typically begins with an investigation of the asset’s title, preparation of a petition and supporting declarations, and filing with the appropriate probate court. Notice and the opportunity for interested parties to respond are usually part of the procedure. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it issues an order treating the asset as trust property, allowing transfer consistent with the trust terms.
This glossary covers essential terms that appear frequently in cases involving Heggstad petitions. Understanding these terms helps clarify what the court will consider and what evidence may be needed. Entries include the legal designation of the trust, how title and ownership differ, the probate court’s role, and the types of documents that support a petition. Familiarity with these concepts helps families and fiduciaries gather relevant records and prepare declarations that address the court’s likely questions. Clear, organized documentation and accurate terminology improve the chances of a concise and effective resolution.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to declare that certain assets were intended to be part of a trust despite being left in the decedent’s individual name. The petition provides evidence of intent and seeks an order treating the assets as trust property so they can be distributed according to the trust terms rather than through conventional probate. This remedy addresses cases where trust funding was incomplete or where title transfers were overlooked. The petition requires persuasive documentation, clear declarations, and adherence to court procedures for notice and filing.
Trust funding refers to the process of retitling assets or naming the trust as beneficiary so that intended property becomes part of the trust estate. Proper funding ensures assets pass according to the trust terms without the delays and public administration of probate. Funding may include deeds, account beneficiary designations, or transfers into trust-owned accounts. When funding is incomplete, petitions like Heggstad aim to correct the record. Documentation demonstrating the trustmaker’s intent to fund the trust is central to establishing that the asset should be treated as trust property at death.
Probate court oversees estate administration, guardianship matters, and many proceedings dealing with the property of deceased persons. In the context of a Heggstad petition, probate court evaluates whether the available evidence supports treating certain assets as trust property. Court rules govern filing, notice to interested parties, and hearings when disputes arise. While Heggstad petitions aim to avoid full probate administration for specific assets, the probate court still plays a decisive role in confirming title transfers and issuing orders that implement the trustmaker’s documented plan.
A declaration in support of a Heggstad petition is a sworn written statement by a person with knowledge of the trustmaker’s intent, often the trustee, attorney, or another close associate. The declaration explains why the asset was meant to be part of the trust, references relevant documents, and provides context that supports the petition. Such declarations are powerful evidence when they include specific observations, dates, and corroborating facts. A well-prepared declaration helps the court understand the circumstances and increases the likelihood that the petition will be granted.
When assets remain untitled after a trustmaker’s death, families can consider a Heggstad petition, full probate administration, or settlement through beneficiary designations where applicable. A Heggstad petition is typically faster and more focused, addressing only the specific items intended for the trust. Probate may be required for other estate matters or when title disputes cannot be resolved through a petition. In some cases, informal transfer methods work if all parties agree and proper documents exist. The choice depends on the asset type, available evidence, and whether any interested party contests the transfer.
A Heggstad petition is often appropriate when only one or a few assets were left in the decedent’s name by oversight and the trust otherwise governs the estate. When documentary evidence and witness declarations show clear intent to include those specific assets in the trust, a focused petition can resolve title without needing an entire probate administration. This limited approach reduces court time and concentrates on the items in question, enabling beneficiaries to receive property according to the trust while preserving privacy and minimizing procedural complexity.
A narrowly tailored petition works well when interested parties do not contest the transfer and are willing to provide declarations or other supporting evidence. Where the trustee and beneficiaries agree on the decedent’s intent, the court can often act quickly on the petition with minimal litigation. This cooperative context encourages efficient resolution and reduces the expense and delay associated with adversarial proceedings. Clear, credible documentation and voluntary cooperation are strong indicators that a limited approach will succeed in aligning asset titles with the trust.
Comprehensive legal work becomes necessary when asset titles are complex, multiple parties dispute the decedent’s intent, or records are incomplete or contradictory. In such cases, thorough investigation, additional declarations, and a broader court filing strategy may be required to resolve competing claims and to protect the rights of beneficiaries. Careful case development helps present evidence in a way that addresses potential objections and clarifies the legal basis for treating the asset as trust property, guarding against later challenges and ensuring a durable court order.
When many assets are affected or when issues intertwine with other estate matters like creditor claims, beneficiary disputes, or pending guardianship matters, a more comprehensive approach is often advisable. Coordinated filings, discovery, and careful legal strategy can streamline resolution of interrelated matters and prevent piecemeal litigation. Addressing all relevant issues together helps ensure that asset transfers, fiduciary duties, and beneficiary rights are resolved consistently and in a manner that supports the overall estate plan while minimizing the risk of conflicting court orders down the road.
A comprehensive approach to addressing trust funding issues and Heggstad petitions can provide a more durable resolution because it considers the full context of the estate plan, title issues, and potential disputes. This approach allows for gathering broader evidence, coordinating with other estate proceedings, and anticipating objections that might arise from creditors or beneficiaries. By building a well-supported administrative and legal record, the process reduces the risk of re-litigation and helps ensure that assets end up where the decedent intended. The added effort upfront often saves time and stress later.
Comprehensive handling also fosters clearer communication among trustees, beneficiaries, and other stakeholders, enabling coordinated decision-making and strategic planning for distributions. When multiple assets or parties are involved, a unified strategy ensures consistency in filings and reduces the chance of conflicting outcomes in separate proceedings. Thorough preparation can also identify ancillary tasks such as updating beneficiary designations, completing certification of trust documents, or addressing related filings like a Trust Modification Petition, all of which contribute to a smoother overall administration process.
A comprehensive approach emphasizes building a robust evidentiary record that articulates the decedent’s intent and documents the steps taken to fund the trust. This minimizes the chance that a later challenge will overturn the transfer or require additional court action. By anticipating possible objections and addressing them in advance, the process helps secure a definitive order from the court that is less vulnerable to dispute. Beneficiaries benefit from the greater certainty and fewer interruptions as assets move from the decedent’s name into the trust for distribution.
Comprehensive service coordinates Heggstad petitions with other estate planning tasks such as trust certification, pour-over wills, and resolving beneficiary designations. This ensures that transfers occur in harmony with the overall distribution plan and that no outstanding administrative steps are overlooked. Coordinated handling reduces redundancy, prevents conflicting orders, and allows trustees and family members to address remaining estate tasks in an organized way. The result is a more efficient administration and a clearer path for assets to reach intended recipients.
Begin by compiling all documents and records that reflect the decedent’s intent to fund a trust, including the trust instrument, drafts, correspondence, deeds, account statements, and notes from estate planning meetings. Collecting these materials early simplifies preparation and makes it easier to craft declarations that the court will find persuasive. Witness statements from the trustee or others who observed the decedent’s planning steps can add weight. Early organization reduces delays and helps ensure that the petition addresses the court’s likely questions in a concise, focused manner.
When possible, coordinate with beneficiaries and the trustee before filing to obtain consensus and supporting declarations. Cooperation reduces the likelihood of contested hearings and often enables a smoother process with fewer procedural hurdles. If disagreements exist, early communication can identify core issues and determine whether additional evidence or a broader legal approach is needed. Keeping interested parties informed and involved helps manage expectations and fosters a collaborative atmosphere that can lead to quicker resolution and a successful transfer consistent with the trustmaker’s wishes.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust were not retitled and you want to align property distribution with the trust’s terms without launching a full probate administration. This option is especially relevant for bank accounts, real estate, or other titled property that can be shown to have been meant for the trust. The petition can expedite transfers, reduce public court procedures, and help preserve the privacy that trusts are designed to provide. Families often choose this route to honor the decedent’s plan in a direct and targeted way.
A Heggstad petition is also appropriate when you have documentation supporting the trustmaker’s intent but need judicial recognition to complete transfers. When beneficiaries and fiduciaries seek an orderly transition of assets into the trust, a petition can create the formal legal finding required to adjust title. This approach helps avoid unintended distribution outcomes and reduces administrative friction. It is a practical tool when ordinary funding methods were overlooked and the overall estate plan remains the best guide to the decedent’s wishes.
Typical circumstances include a newly deceased individual whose trust was fully prepared but certain assets were not retitled, bank accounts that were never transferred into the trust, deeds that remain in the individual’s name, and retirement or brokerage accounts with inconsistent beneficiary designations. Other situations involve transactions that were in process at the time of death or where clerical oversight prevented funding. When the decedent’s intent is documented, a Heggstad petition can often be the most efficient path to correct title and carry out the trust’s instructions.
One frequent scenario is a property deed that was not recorded in the name of the decedent’s trust despite the trustmaker’s clear plan. A Heggstad petition can request that the court treat the deeded property as trust property when documentation and declarations support the intent to fund the trust. This process helps avoid having that home or real estate parcel pass through full probate and aligns the legal title with the estate plan for distribution to named beneficiaries according to the trust terms.
Another typical issue arises when financial accounts were intended to be held in the trust but were left in the decedent’s individual name. A Heggstad petition can address this by presenting account statements, trust documents, and sworn declarations establishing the trustmaker’s intent. When the evidence is strong and interested parties agree, the court may order that the account be treated as trust property so funds can be distributed or transferred according to the trust without prolonged estate administration.
Occasionally, retirement accounts or life insurance policies retain outdated beneficiary designations that conflict with a later-established trust. While beneficiary designations often govern directly, a Heggstad petition can be part of a broader strategy to reconcile these discrepancies when other assets were clearly intended to fund the trust. Addressing such inconsistencies helps ensure that the estate plan functions as a cohesive whole, and that property and proceeds are distributed in a manner consistent with the decedent’s overall intentions.
We are here to help families in Fairview and Alameda County navigate Heggstad petitions and related trust funding issues. Our services include reviewing trust and estate documents, preparing the required court pleadings, collecting declarations and evidentiary support, and representing trustees and beneficiaries in court if necessary. We also assist with related estate planning tasks such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, certification of trust documents, and guardianship nominations for minor care planning. Call 408-528-2827 to arrange a consultation and get practical guidance tailored to your situation.
Clients work with our firm because we provide focused, practical guidance on trust funding and court filings aimed at achieving efficient resolution. We prioritize clear communication about the steps involved in a Heggstad petition and the evidence the court will consider. Our approach emphasizes thorough documentation, timely filings, and proactive coordination with trustees and beneficiaries. By focusing on the specific issues that matter to your case, we help reduce procedural delay and provide a clear plan to resolve title obstacles in a manner consistent with the decedent’s expressed intentions.
We also assist with related documentation that often accompanies a petition, including certification of trust, pour-over wills, and assignments to trust instruments. This full-service approach helps ensure no critical administrative tasks are overlooked and that any orders obtained from the court are implemented smoothly. Our practice aims to minimize disruption for family members while protecting the legal rights and interests of trustees and beneficiaries, and we strive to deliver reliable support throughout every stage of the process.
From initial evidence gathering through petition preparation and court presentation, our firm works to provide clear direction and dependable follow-through tailored to your case. If disputes arise, we help you understand the options and the likely outcomes under California probate law. We also provide guidance on related estate planning updates to prevent future funding issues. For a practical discussion of your circumstances and potential next steps, contact our office at 408-528-2827 to schedule a consultation.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust documents, asset titles, and any correspondence or records that illustrate the decedent’s intent. We then identify the specific items requiring court recognition and gather declarations from trustees or others with personal knowledge. After preparing the petition and supporting materials, we file with the probate court and handle required notices to interested parties. If a hearing is necessary, we present the record in a clear, organized manner. Throughout, we keep clients informed and focused on reaching a practical resolution consistent with the trustmaker’s wishes.
The first step involves collecting and reviewing the trust agreement, deeds, account statements, drafting notes, and any other records that show the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. We identify documents that directly link the asset to the trustmaker’s plan and seek witness statements from the trustee or others who can attest to conversations or actions taken in furtherance of that intent. A careful evidence review lays the foundation for a persuasive petition and helps determine whether a focused Heggstad petition or a broader filing strategy is more appropriate given the facts.
We identify trust provisions, beneficiary designations, deeds, account ledgers, and any drafting notes or correspondence that suggest the decedent intended the asset to be trust property. Verifying dates and signatures and cross-referencing records can reveal a consistent pattern of intent. Where gaps exist, we explore other sources such as bank records or attorney notes that may corroborate the decedent’s plans. The goal is to assemble a coherent set of supporting materials that clearly tie the asset to the trust for presentation to the court.
Next, we prepare sworn declarations from individuals with direct knowledge of the trustmaker’s intent, often the trustee, attorney, or close family members. These declarations explain the circumstances, reference supporting documents, and provide facts about conversations or actions taken to fund the trust. Well-crafted declarations address the questions the court will ask and supply the narrative that ties documentary evidence to the decedent’s plan. Clear, detailed declarations strengthen the petition and increase the likelihood of a favorable court order.
After gathering documentary and testimonial evidence, we draft the Heggstad petition and compile supporting declarations and exhibits. The petition sets forth the legal basis for treating the asset as trust property and requests appropriate court orders to effect the transfer. We ensure proper filing with the probate court and coordinate service and notice to interested parties in compliance with procedural rules. Accurate and complete filings help avoid procedural objections and keep the process moving toward resolution.
We draft pleadings that concisely present the facts, legal authority, and requested relief to the court, attaching declarations and relevant documentary exhibits. The pleadings explain the nature of the assets, the basis for the requested order, and any required notice procedures. Clarity and organization in the filings help the court and interested parties understand the case quickly, which can reduce delays and focus attention on the substantive proof of intent rather than procedural disputes.
We handle the procedural requirements for serving notices on beneficiaries and other interested parties, observing statutory timelines and court rules. Proper notice ensures that parties have the opportunity to respond and that the court’s order will be effective and enforceable. When potential objections exist, timely notice and thorough filing can reduce surprises and lay the groundwork for resolving disputes through declarations or negotiated agreements rather than contested hearings.
If the petition proceeds to a hearing, we present the assembled record, declarations, and exhibits to the court and respond to any factual or procedural objections. When the court finds the evidence persuasive, it issues an order declaring the asset to be trust property and directs the necessary transfers or modifications to title. After the court’s order, we assist with implementing the transfer, such as recording deeds or changing account registrations, so the assets are administered and distributed according to the trust’s terms.
At any required hearing, we present a clear narrative supported by declarations and documentary evidence, and answer questions the judge may have about intent, timing, and the connection between the asset and the trust. A focused presentation helps the court understand the scope of the petition and the strength of the supporting record. Where objections arise, we address them with targeted evidence and legal argument to reinforce the basis for treating the asset as trust property.
Once the court issues its order, we assist with the mechanical steps needed to change titles or re-register accounts in the trust’s name, including recording deeds, updating account registrations, and providing certified copies of court orders to financial institutions. Completing these post-order tasks ensures the asset is practically and legally part of the trust estate so it can be administered and distributed under the trust terms. We follow through to make sure the transfer is effective and aligns with the overall estate plan.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request to a probate court to treat certain assets as having been transferred to a trust even though the transfers were not completed before the trustmaker’s death. This filing is used when the trust instrument and supporting evidence indicate that the decedent intended the property to be part of the trust, but the asset remains in the decedent’s name. The petition provides a pathway to adjust title and allow distribution according to the trust, avoiding the need to treat those particular assets as part of an intestate or probate estate. The petition typically includes declarations from individuals familiar with the trustmaker’s intentions, documentary exhibits such as deeds or account records, and a legal explanation of why the court should treat the asset as trust property. The court evaluates whether the presented evidence demonstrates the decedent’s intent and may issue an order reflecting that finding. The remedy is focused on aligning asset title with the trustmaker’s documented plan when funding was incomplete.
The timeline for resolving a Heggstad petition varies depending on the completeness of the evidence, whether interested parties agree, and the court’s schedule. In straightforward cases with clear documentation and no objections, a petition can move relatively quickly through filing, notice, and a court hearing, potentially resolving in a matter of weeks or a few months. When additional investigation is required or when objections are filed, the process may extend further and require multiple hearings or supplemental declarations to address contested issues. Factors that influence timing include the need to obtain witness declarations, the time required for proper service on beneficiaries and other interested parties, and the specific calendar of the probate court where the petition is filed. Working proactively to gather and organize supporting documents can shorten the process, while contested matters or complex title issues will lengthen the timeline accordingly.
The most helpful evidence for a Heggstad petition includes the trust instrument itself, drafts or versions showing intent, deeds, account statements, copies of trust funding checklists, and attorney notes or correspondence that reflect the decedent’s planning. Declarations from the trustee, the attorney who prepared the trust, or other reliable witnesses who observed steps taken to fund the trust are also highly persuasive. Together these materials create a consistent picture demonstrating the decedent’s intention for a particular asset to be trust property. Documentation that establishes timing and decision-making, such as dated drafts, signed drafts, or contemporaneous communications, can be particularly effective. The court will assess the totality of the evidence, so organizing records clearly and preparing detailed declarations that tie each exhibit to the asserted intent is essential for a strong petition.
A Heggstad petition can avoid the need for full probate for specific assets identified in the petition by judicially recognizing them as trust property, but it does not automatically eliminate probate for unrelated estate matters. If the petition successfully treats the asset as part of the trust, that asset can be administered under the trust rather than through probate. However, other assets that were not intended for the trust or issues such as creditor claims or contested wills may still require probate administration. The scope of probate avoidance depends on the completeness of the trust funding overall and whether all parties agree on the transfers. When most significant assets are properly treated as trust property, the estate administration burden is greatly reduced, though additional steps may be needed for items outside the trust’s scope.
When filing a Heggstad petition, the petitioner must give notice to all interested parties as required by the probate code and local court rules. Interested parties typically include named beneficiaries, successors to the trust, heirs, and sometimes creditors or known claimants who may have an interest in the asset. Proper notice ensures that those who may be affected have the opportunity to review the petition and to object if they believe the petition lacks sufficient support or would harm their legal interests. Fulfilling notification requirements precisely is important for the court’s acceptance of the petition and the enforceability of any resulting order. We handle the procedural requirements for service and can advise which parties must be notified based on the asset type and the decedent’s estate plan, helping the petition proceed in compliance with statutory timelines.
If someone contests a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objections and may require additional evidence or hold an adversary-style hearing to resolve disputed facts. Contests can focus on the decedent’s intent, the adequacy of the supporting documentation, or competing claims to the asset. When objections arise, it often becomes necessary to supplement the record with further declarations, documentary proof, or legal argument addressing the specific challenges raised by the opposing party. Resolving contested petitions may involve negotiation, settlement discussions, or litigation before the probate court. A thorough preparation of the original petition and a responsive strategy for addressing challenges improves the chance of a favorable outcome, but contested matters typically extend the timeline and can increase the procedural complexity and cost.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the facts, the amount of evidence gathering required, and whether the matter becomes contested. In a straightforward case with good documentation and no disputes, filing and administrative fees, combined with preparation of the petition and declarations, can result in a moderate expense. When additional investigation, expert consultation, or contested hearings are necessary, costs will increase accordingly. The overall expense depends on the time required to prepare pleadings and respond to any objections. We discuss likely costs and options during an initial consultation and provide guidance on anticipated fee ranges for typical scenarios. Clients can make informed decisions about whether a petition or an alternative approach is most appropriate for their budget and objectives, and we work to keep fees transparent throughout the matter.
Yes, trustees can typically file a Heggstad petition on behalf of the trust to obtain a court order recognizing certain assets as trust property. The trustee’s role in filing is appropriate when the trustee has information and documentation showing the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Trustees often are the most suitable parties to present declarations explaining the trust’s history, actions taken to fund the trust, and the reasons the asset belongs to the trust estate. When a trustee files, it is important to ensure the filings address notice requirements and that the trustee acts within the scope of fiduciary duties. Trustees must also consider potential conflicts and ensure that beneficiaries are treated fairly throughout the process. Proper preparation and clear documentation support the trustee’s position and help the court reach a reasoned determination.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include informal agreements among beneficiaries and trustees to transfer assets without court involvement when all parties agree and paperwork is straightforward. In some cases, submitting corrected beneficiary designations or using small estate procedures for limited-value assets may accomplish a transfer without a petition. Full probate administration is another alternative when assets or disputes require a broader court process. The appropriate route depends on the asset type, the presence of disputes, and the strength of supporting documentation pointing to the decedent’s intent. When informal methods are impractical or when parties cannot agree, a Heggstad petition remains a focused legal mechanism to address specific funding gaps. Consulting with counsel helps determine which path is most efficient and least disruptive given the facts and the goals of the beneficiaries and fiduciaries.
To avoid the need for a Heggstad petition in the future, take proactive steps to fund trusts during the trustmaker’s life by executing deeds, updating account registrations, and confirming beneficiary designations reflect the trust plan. Keep clear records of communications with financial institutions and the attorney who prepared the trust. Regular reviews of estate planning documents, especially after major life events, help ensure that assets remain properly titled and coordinated with the trust’s terms. Additionally, preparing a trust funding checklist and following through on each step can prevent oversights. When trustees or family members are involved in funding, documenting actions taken and maintaining copies of transferred documents makes it easier to demonstrate intent and avoids the administrative and legal work associated with post-death corrections.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas