If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Livermore or elsewhere in Alameda County, a trust modification petition may be the path to update terms, correct errors, or address changed circumstances. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, our focus is on guiding clients through the legal options for revising trust provisions while minimizing family conflict and preserving assets. This introduction outlines the basics of when a petition is appropriate, the local court procedures you may face, and how careful planning can help you achieve a durable outcome that reflects current needs and intentions.
Many people believe trusts are fixed documents that cannot be altered, but in California there are lawful procedures to modify or reform a trust when circumstances change or when a trust does not reflect the settlor’s intent. Whether the change involves correcting a drafting error, addressing family changes, or adjusting distributions because of financial shifts, a trust modification petition is a formal route to request the court’s approval for those changes. This paragraph explains typical reasons clients pursue petitions and emphasizes the importance of following court rules and state statutes to obtain a stable, enforceable result.
Filing a trust modification petition can provide legal clarity and prevent future disputes among beneficiaries by resolving ambiguities and aligning the trust with the settlor’s current wishes. It can restore intended distributions after a drafting error, adapt to significant life events such as marriage, divorce, or incapacity, and protect assets when tax or financial circumstances change. A properly handled petition reduces the risk of protracted litigation later, helps maintain family relationships, and ensures the trust operates as intended. Thoughtful petition preparation supports predictable administration of the trust and preserves the settlor’s objectives for the estate.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists Livermore and Bay Area residents with a full range of estate planning matters, including trust modification petitions. Our approach emphasizes careful analysis of trust documents, clear communication with clients, and strategic handling of petitions to local courts. We work to identify the most appropriate legal theory for modification, whether it is a reformation to reflect the settlor’s intent, a modification allowed under the trust terms, or a petition to address changed circumstances. Our goal is to produce durable results that reduce future disputes and protect family assets.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a court to change the terms or administration of an existing trust when informal amendment is not possible or when the trust document contains errors or omissions. The petition must explain the legal basis for the requested change and include evidence such as drafting records, communications, or other documentation that supports the settlor’s intent. Courts consider statutory rules and equitable principles when evaluating petitions, and outcomes depend on the strength of the supporting facts and legal arguments presented. The process requires careful drafting and evidence gathering to meet legal standards.
Different paths are available when seeking trust modification, and the correct path depends on whether the trust is revocable, irrevocable, or explicitly permits amendments. For revocable trusts, changes are often simpler if the settlor is alive and able to execute a new document, while for irrevocable trusts a court petition may be necessary to address mistakes, changed circumstances, or ambiguous terms. California law allows reformation in some instances to correct mistakes and offers mechanisms for modification when all beneficiaries consent. Knowing the available options helps determine the most efficient path forward while safeguarding the interests of beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition asks the court to change specific provisions of a trust, declare a certain interpretation, correct a drafting error, or authorize actions inconsistent with the trust as written when necessary. The petition defines the requested relief and explains why it is consistent with the settlor’s intent or required by fairness and changed circumstances. Petitions often include proposed amended trust language, factual support for the request, and statements from interested parties. A successful petition results in a court order that clarifies or changes the trust and guides future administration, helping trustees and beneficiaries follow a clear legal directive.
Preparing a petition involves identifying the legal theory for modification, assembling documentary evidence, drafting precise proposed language, and notifying interested parties. The petition should explain the factual background, show why the requested change is appropriate, and attach relevant documents such as the current trust instrument, amendments, and any communications that bear on the settlor’s intent. After filing, there may be court appearances, opportunities for beneficiaries to respond, and negotiation to narrow disputes. The process culminates in a court decision and an order implementing the modification, which trustees then must follow in trust administration.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the petition process. Terms like reformation, modification, settlor, trustee, beneficiary, and petition are used frequently and carry specific legal meanings. Reformation generally refers to correcting a written instrument to reflect true intent, while modification may refer to broader changes permitted by law or the trust terms. The settlor is the person who created the trust, the trustee administers it, and beneficiaries receive benefits. Familiarity with these terms clarifies the petitions and court orders that govern how a trust is changed and administered going forward.
Reformation is the legal process used to correct a written trust to match the true intent of the settlor when the document contains a factual mistake or drafting error. In a petition for reformation, evidence is presented to show that the document as drafted does not reflect what the settlor intended. Courts may order reformation when the evidence meets the required standard and supports changing the written language to align with that intent. Reformation aims to honor the settlor’s original objectives and avoid unintended consequences caused by mistakes in drafting or description.
Modification refers to a lawful change in the terms of a trust that may be permitted by the document itself or ordered by a court. Unlike simple amendments that the settlor can make when authorized, modifications often involve judicial action to adjust distributions, correct inconsistencies, or respond to changed circumstances. Courts consider statutory guidelines and the interests of beneficiaries when deciding whether to allow a modification. A court-ordered modification becomes binding on the trustee and beneficiaries under the terms specified in the court’s order.
The settlor is the person who creates the trust, establishes its terms, and funds it with assets. The trustee is the person or entity charged with managing the trust assets and carrying out the trust’s instructions for the benefit of the beneficiaries. When a trust modification petition is filed, courts assess the settlor’s intent and the trustee’s obligations under the trust instrument. The trustee may have duties to notify beneficiaries and follow court orders, and the trustee’s role is central to ensuring that any approved changes are implemented properly in administration.
A beneficiary is an individual or entity designated to receive benefits from the trust, and beneficiaries have interests that the court will protect during a modification proceeding. A petition is the formal document filed with the court requesting action, such as reformation or modification, and it outlines the legal basis for the requested relief and supporting facts. Beneficiaries are typically notified and may respond to the petition. Courts weigh beneficiary interests, settlor intent, and statutory criteria when deciding whether to grant the requested relief.
There are multiple paths to change a trust, each with different implications. When the settlor is alive and authorized by the trust terms, an informal amendment can often update the trust without court involvement. If beneficiaries unanimously consent and the trust permits, a precautionary nonjudicial approach may be used. When those avenues are unavailable, a court petition provides a formal mechanism to correct mistakes, adjust distributions, or clarify ambiguous provisions. Choosing the right option depends on the trust’s terms, the settlor’s capacity, beneficiary interests, and the nature of the requested change.
If the settlor is living and retains the ability to execute legal documents, they can often make a direct amendment to update beneficiaries, change trustees, or alter administrative provisions. This route avoids court proceedings and is frequently faster and less costly. It requires careful drafting to ensure the amendment is clear, follows the trust’s amendment procedures, and aligns with other estate planning documents. Documentation should be preserved to demonstrate the settlor’s intent so future disputes can be minimized and trustees have clear instructions for trust administration.
When all beneficiaries agree on a change and the trust allows nonjudicial resolutions, a written agreement can often be used to modify certain aspects of trust administration without filing a petition. This approach can preserve privacy and reduce costs while resolving disputes amicably. The agreement must be drafted carefully to ensure it is legally binding and does not violate statutory protections for certain beneficiaries. It is important to document the consent fully and to consider whether third parties or tax consequences are affected by the change.
If the trust contains ambiguous language, drafting mistakes, or conflicts with other estate documents, a court petition may be required to clarify intent and resolve those inconsistencies. Courts can reform documents to reflect the settlor’s true intention when adequate evidence supports such relief. Petitioning the court is often the correct choice when informal amendments are impractical or when beneficiaries dispute interpretation. This path ensures that the document’s administration follows a clear, enforceable order and reduces the risk of continued disagreement among interested parties.
Irrevocable trusts generally cannot be changed by the settlor after funding without court approval or the consent of parties authorized under the trust. Similarly, if the settlor is incapacitated and cannot sign amendments, a court proceeding may be the appropriate route to make necessary changes for administration or to correct errors. In these circumstances, a petition provides a formal legal record and court oversight, protecting beneficiary rights while allowing necessary modifications that align with the settlor’s intent and current circumstances.
A carefully prepared petition can bring lasting clarity to a trust and reduce the likelihood of future litigation by documenting the reasons for change and obtaining a court order that resolves disputes. This approach preserves relationships by addressing disagreements transparently, provides trustees with authoritative instructions, and protects beneficiary interests through court oversight. In many cases, investing time in comprehensive preparation prevents costly challenges later and ensures the trust functions as intended, protecting assets and the settlor’s legacy for the benefit of named recipients.
Beyond dispute avoidance, a methodical petition process helps identify and manage tax, creditor, or administrative consequences of proposed changes. It can clarify trustee powers, streamline administration, and resolve problems that might otherwise hinder trust distributions. A judicially approved solution also gives beneficiaries confidence that the change was properly vetted and legally authorized. This structured outcome supports consistent and predictable trust management and reduces the burden on trustees who might otherwise face competing directions from interested parties.
Securing a court order through a petition provides a formal, enforceable resolution that minimizes ambiguity and reduces the likelihood of subsequent legal challenges. By establishing a clear record of the settlor’s intent and the reasons for modification, a judicial decision limits grounds for later disagreement among beneficiaries. This stability helps trustees administer the trust with confidence and allows families to move forward without lingering uncertainty. The permanence of a court order supports long-term asset protection and smooth trust operation in line with the settlor’s objectives.
A court-approved modification provides binding guidance for trustees and beneficiaries, reducing administrative ambiguity and helping ensure distributions are made in accordance with the revised terms. This legal certainty streamlines the daily management of trust assets and minimizes the need for trustees to second-guess their authority. With documented court authorization, financial institutions and third parties are more likely to accept trustee actions without unnecessary delay, which supports efficient administration and protects trust assets from avoidable disputes or challenges.
Collecting the original trust document, any amendments, related wills, letters of intent, communications with the drafter, and records of funding provides essential context for a petition. These materials help demonstrate the settlor’s original intentions and identify drafting errors or inconsistencies. Detailed records can show timelines, clarifying why a modification is appropriate. Organizing documents early streamlines the petition drafting process, supports factual assertions, and can reduce delays by making evidence readily available for filing and for court review.
Before filing, evaluate the timing of the proposed change and any tax or creditor implications that could arise from modification. Certain alterations may have unintended effects on estate tax exposure, retirement accounts, or creditor claims. Reviewing financial impacts and coordinating changes with other estate documents helps prevent adverse consequences. Planning ahead allows for a petition that addresses these concerns and proposes tailored language to mitigate downstream risks for the trust and its beneficiaries.
You might consider a petition when the trust does not reflect the settlor’s true intent, when family circumstances have changed, or when trustees encounter ambiguities that hinder administration. A petition helps correct drafting errors, clarify ambiguous clauses, and adapt trust provisions to unforeseen events such as marriage, divorce, disability, changes in financial circumstances, or shifting tax considerations. Pursuing a petition can provide legal certainty and a clear roadmap for trustees, reducing the risk of disputes that could slow distributions or deplete assets through litigation.
Other reasons include resolving conflicts among beneficiaries, adjusting distribution schedules to reflect changed needs, or obtaining court approval when the settlor lacks capacity to amend the trust directly. In some cases, beneficiaries or trustees may seek a petition to confirm authority to take specific actions that the trust does not explicitly authorize. By addressing these issues through the court, parties ensure that changes are legally enforceable and supported by a formal order that governs future administration and protects fiduciary decision-making.
Typical circumstances include drafting mistakes that produce unintended outcomes, newly discovered assets that were not accounted for, changes in family structure such as births or divorces, and disagreements among beneficiaries about distributions. Additionally, changing tax laws or financial considerations may prompt a petition to adjust trust terms for better stewardship. When the settlor is incapacitated and cannot amend the trust directly, petitioning the court can provide a path to necessary changes for administration or to correct ambiguities that prevent the trust from operating as intended.
When a trust contains unclear language or errors that lead to conflicting interpretations, a petition can request reformation to reflect the settlor’s true intentions. These issues often arise when clauses are drafted imprecisely, when revisions were made without integrating changes, or when ancillary documents contradict the trust. A court can examine evidence such as drafting drafts, communications, and contemporaneous notes to determine whether reformation is warranted. Correcting such problems through a petition helps ensure the trust functions as the settlor intended and prevents disputes among beneficiaries.
Significant life events like marriage, divorce, births, deaths, or the changing needs of beneficiaries can make previously drafted provisions incompatible with current realities. A petition can adapt the trust to address new family dynamics, revise distribution plans, or add protections for vulnerable beneficiaries. Courts can approve modifications when they serve the settlor’s intent and the best interests of beneficiaries, ensuring that the trust remains an effective tool for passing wealth and care according to updated priorities and circumstances.
If the settlor becomes incapacitated or original documents cannot be located, a petition may be necessary to interpret intent, recreate terms, or allow necessary administrative actions. The court can review available evidence and issue orders that permit trustees to manage trust assets or to make changes consistent with the settlor’s likely intentions. This process helps trustees fulfill fiduciary duties in the absence of clear instructions and protects beneficiaries by creating a verified legal basis for trust administration and any approved modifications.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists Livermore residents with trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. We handle document review, petition drafting, evidence assembly, beneficiary communications, and court filings in Alameda County. Our work is directed toward helping clients obtain clear, enforceable orders that achieve their objectives while protecting beneficiary interests. Whether you need to correct a drafting error, clarify trustee powers, or adapt an estate plan to new circumstances, we provide a steady and practical approach to guide you through the process and help secure an outcome that supports your family’s needs.
Clients choose the firm for focused attention on trust matters and a track record of guiding families through sensitive changes with clarity and care. We emphasize thorough preparation, clear communication, and strategic advocacy to present petitions effectively in local courts. Our team assists in gathering documentary evidence, preparing proposed language for court approval, and coordinating beneficiary notice and responses. The goal is to reach a legally sound resolution that aligns with the settlor’s intent and minimizes conflict among beneficiaries throughout the process.
We provide hands-on support at each stage of the petition process and work to explain the legal options and likely outcomes in understandable terms. Our practice serves clients throughout Livermore and Alameda County, offering guidance tailored to local court procedures and practical considerations specific to regional practice. We prioritize timely action to protect assets and interests and maintain open lines of communication so clients know what to expect from filing to final court order. This helps reduce anxiety and ensures an organized path forward.
Whether the matter is straightforward or contested, our approach is to identify the strongest available path to achieve the client’s objectives and to prepare a petition that anticipates foreseeable responses from beneficiaries and the court. We support trustees with implementation following an order, ensuring the revised terms are applied properly in trust administration. For families seeking reasonable, enforceable resolutions in trust modification matters, the firm provides practical, local representation focused on achieving lasting results that protect the trust and its intended beneficiaries.
Our process begins with a detailed review of the trust and related documents, followed by a focused plan to gather evidence and craft proposed modifications. We prepare the petition and necessary attachments, serve required notices, and file with the appropriate Alameda County court. If beneficiaries respond or objections arise, we engage in negotiation and, when needed, present the case at hearing. After obtaining a court order, we assist trustees with implementation, document recording, and follow-up to ensure the trust administration reflects the court-approved changes.
This initial phase involves a thorough review of the trust instrument, amendments, related estate planning documents, and any communications or drafting notes that illuminate the settlor’s intent. We assess whether informal amendment, beneficiary agreement, or a court petition is the appropriate path. Identifying the legal basis for modification and collecting supporting evidence at the outset improves the likelihood of an efficient resolution and informs the drafting of proposed language and the overall strategy for presenting the petition to the court.
Collecting all relevant documents and communications is essential to support the requested modification. This may include prior drafts, correspondence with the trust drafter, account statements, and records showing the settlor’s intent or changed circumstances. Well-organized evidence helps clarify issues for the court and can reduce disputes by making the factual basis for the petition clear and persuasive. We work with clients to identify and preserve materials that best support the requested relief.
After assembling documents, we evaluate possible legal approaches and recommend a strategy tailored to the trust’s terms and family dynamics. This includes considering nonjudicial options where appropriate, assessing potential opposition, and preparing proposed modified language for the petition. A proactive strategy anticipates issues likely to arise from beneficiaries or trustees and includes plans to address them during negotiations or court proceedings, helping to achieve a resolution that is durable and consistent with the settlor’s wishes.
Drafting the petition requires careful legal framing of the requested relief, inclusion of supporting evidence, and proposed revised terms for the trust. We ensure the filing complies with Alameda County court rules and includes proper notice to all interested parties. Filing initiates the formal process and allows beneficiaries the opportunity to respond. Well-prepared pleadings and clear proposed orders increase the likelihood of a favorable resolution, whether by agreement or after a hearing, and help streamline court consideration of the requested changes.
Proper notice to beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties is a procedural necessity that also helps reduce surprises and encourages early engagement. We prepare and serve the necessary notices and can assist with facilitating conversations to explore settlement possibilities prior to contested litigation. Clear communication at this stage can narrow disputed points and sometimes leads to voluntary resolutions that avoid a contested hearing, preserving resources and family relationships whenever feasible.
After filing, interested parties may respond with agreements or objections. We review responses, advise clients on options, and engage in negotiations aimed at narrowing issues or reaching settlement. If settlement is achievable, we prepare stipulations and proposed orders for the court’s approval. If disputes remain, we prepare evidence and legal arguments for hearing, ensuring a focused presentation that addresses the essential factual and legal questions the court must resolve.
When a hearing is necessary, we present the petition and supporting evidence concisely and persuasively, seeking a court order that implements the requested changes. Following a favorable ruling, we assist with drafting the final order, recording any required documents, and advising trustees on implementing the revised terms. We also help manage any follow-up actions to ensure the trust administration aligns with the court’s decision and that institutions recognize and accept the modified provisions without unnecessary delay.
At the hearing, the court will evaluate the factual record and legal arguments supporting the petition. We prepare witness statements, documentary exhibits, and clear legal briefing to articulate why the requested modification is appropriate. Presenting the case effectively helps the court understand the settlor’s intent and the impact of the requested change, while addressing any objections from beneficiaries. A focused presentation aids the court in issuing an order that resolves contested issues and provides a roadmap for future trust administration.
After a court order is entered, practical steps follow to implement the revised terms: updating trust records, notifying financial institutions, and guiding trustees on distributions and management under the new order. We assist with preparing final documents and any required filings, and we advise trustees on best practices to avoid future disputes. Clear implementation ensures that the court’s decision translates into efficient trust administration and that beneficiaries receive the benefits contemplated by the revised trust terms.
A trust modification petition is commonly pursued when a trust contains drafting mistakes, ambiguous language, or conflicts with other estate planning documents that prevent the trust from operating as intended. It is also appropriate when family circumstances change significantly, such as divorce, remarriage, births, or the death of a named beneficiary, and when the settlor lacks capacity to execute a direct amendment. Additionally, petitions may be necessary to clarify trustee powers or to authorize administrative actions that the trust does not clearly permit. A petition can also address newly discovered assets not included in the original trust or circumstances where nonjudicial options are impractical because beneficiaries disagree. The court evaluates whether the requested change aligns with the settlor’s intent or is equitable under applicable law. Preparing a petition with thorough evidence and careful proposed language increases the chance of obtaining an order that resolves the issue and guides future administration.
Courts determine the settlor’s intent by reviewing the trust instrument, related documents, and any extrinsic evidence that sheds light on what the settlor intended. Relevant materials may include prior drafts, correspondence with the drafter, statements of intent, and contemporaneous notes or recordings showing the settlor’s wishes. The court considers this evidence alongside the plain language of the trust to resolve ambiguities and, when appropriate, order reformation to conform the document to the proven intent. Judge consideration also includes statutory principles and established case law guiding how and when reformation or modification is allowed. The strength and clarity of supporting evidence directly affect the court’s willingness to alter written terms, so assembling clear documentary and testimonial evidence early in the process is critical for a persuasive petition.
Yes, beneficiaries can sometimes agree to modify a trust without court intervention if the trust terms permit nonjudicial modification and all interested parties consent. When all beneficiaries are competent and willing to sign a written agreement, parties may use that path to change administrative details or distributions. This approach can preserve privacy and reduce costs while achieving the desired result if the trust and applicable law permit such agreements. However, unanimous consent may not be available in many situations, and certain trusts or beneficiary protections may prevent nonjudicial changes. When the settlor lacks capacity, when beneficiaries disagree, or when state law and trust language restrict nonjudicial changes, filing a petition is often necessary to obtain formal court authorization for the requested modification.
The most persuasive evidence in a reformation petition demonstrates the settlor’s intent and shows that the written trust fails to reflect that intent due to mistake or oversight. This often includes prior drafts, communications with the drafter, witness statements, drafting notes, and contemporaneous documents demonstrating the settlor’s wishes. Clear, contemporaneous evidence that connects the settlor’s documented intentions to the requested change strengthens a petition. Affidavits or declarations from individuals who participated in the trust’s preparation, along with documentary proof, help the court understand the background and justify reformation. The combination of strong documentary evidence and credible witness statements typically produces the best outcome when seeking to align the written instrument with what the settlor actually intended.
The timeline for a trust modification petition in Alameda County varies depending on case complexity, whether beneficiaries contest the petition, and court scheduling. Simple uncontested matters may resolve relatively quickly, sometimes within a few months, while contested petitions can take longer due to responses, hearings, and possible evidentiary proceedings. Court calendars and procedural requirements affect the overall duration, and careful preparation can help avoid unnecessary delays. Early efforts to notify and engage beneficiaries, to gather strong supporting evidence, and to prepare clear proposed orders can shorten the process. If disputes arise, mediation or settlement discussions may expedite resolution compared with prolonged litigation, so exploring negotiated outcomes often benefits all parties by reducing time and expense.
A court-ordered modification can have tax implications depending on the nature of the change and the assets involved. Alterations that affect ownership, timing of distributions, or beneficiary designations may influence estate tax, gift tax, or income tax consequences. It is important to evaluate potential tax effects as part of the planning process and to coordinate with tax advisors when changes could have fiscal impact. Addressing tax considerations during petition preparation allows for drafting language that minimizes adverse consequences where possible and ensures the court and parties understand any fiscal implications. This coordination helps protect trust assets and beneficiary interests by anticipating and managing tax-related issues before seeking court approval.
Trustees may continue to perform routine administrative duties while a petition is pending, but they should exercise caution when taking actions that could be inconsistent with the trust’s terms or with the relief sought in the petition. Trustees have a duty to preserve trust assets and avoid actions that might prejudice beneficiaries or interfere with the court’s ability to resolve the matter. When in doubt, trustees should seek guidance before taking significant steps and may request interim instructions from the court when necessary. Communicating with beneficiaries and documenting decisions helps trustees manage potential disputes while the petition proceeds. If controversial actions are necessary for asset protection or to prevent harm, trustees can seek immediate court authority to act, which provides legal cover and avoids later allegations of impropriety or breach of fiduciary duty.
If a beneficiary objects to a proposed modification, the court will consider the objection and assess whether the petition should be granted in light of the evidence and applicable law. The objection may raise factual disputes or legal arguments about the settlor’s intent, the sufficiency of notice, or potential adverse consequences to beneficiaries. The court may schedule a hearing to evaluate the competing positions and decide whether reformation or modification is appropriate. Objections can also create opportunities for negotiation to narrow contested issues. Parties may reach a settlement that resolves the objection and achieves a practical solution without a prolonged hearing. Mediation or structured discussions can be effective tools for resolving disagreements while reducing expense and preserving family relationships where possible.
Revocable trusts are generally easier to change when the settlor is alive and retains capacity because the settlor can directly amend or restate the trust according to the terms provided. This flexibility allows for straightforward revisions without court involvement when the settlor takes action. The simplicity of direct amendment often makes revocable trusts the preferred vehicle for ongoing estate planning during the settlor’s lifetime. Irrevocable trusts are more complex because the settlor typically cannot unilaterally alter terms after funding. Changes to irrevocable trusts often require beneficiary consent, the presence of specific provisions permitting modification, or a court petition demonstrating legal grounds for modification. Because of these constraints, petitions for irrevocable trust changes generally require additional legal analysis and careful preparation.
To start a trust modification petition, gather the original trust and related documents, collect any drafting notes or communications that demonstrate the settlor’s intent, and document the circumstances that make modification necessary. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to arrange a consultation so we can review your materials, explain potential legal options, and recommend the next steps tailored to your situation. Early documentation and a clear summary of the goals for modification help shape an efficient strategy for filing. During the initial consultation, we will assess whether informal amendment, beneficiary consent, or a court petition is the proper approach, and we will outline the likely evidence needed to support the requested relief. From there we prepare the petition, arrange service on interested parties, and guide you through the filing and hearing process while working to secure a legally enforceable resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas