A Heggstad petition can be an important tool when property that was intended to be part of a decedent’s trust ends up titled outside the trust. In Pleasanton and throughout Alameda County, families often discover these issues after a loved one passes away, creating uncertainty about how assets should be handled. This guide explains when a Heggstad petition may be appropriate, what the process typically involves, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can assist with petitions and related trust administration matters in California courts.
Many clients come to us after realizing that assets meant for a trust were not properly retitled or otherwise ended up in a decedent’s individual name. A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain property was intended to belong to a trust and should be treated as trust property. The petition process helps avoid unnecessary probate and aligns estate administration with the decedent’s documented wishes, including pour-over wills, revocable living trusts, and other estate planning documents commonly used in the Bay Area.
Filing a Heggstad petition can preserve the benefits of a trust-based estate plan by ensuring property is distributed according to trust terms rather than through probate. When the court acknowledges that assets should be treated as trust property, the administrative burden for beneficiaries can be reduced and timelines shortened. This process helps maintain privacy for the estate, enables continuity in asset management, and can prevent disputes about ownership. For families seeking clarity after a transfer mistake, a successful petition restores the intended structure of the decedent’s plan and supports efficient trust administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across San Jose, Pleasanton, and the broader Bay Area with focused estate planning and trust administration services. Our attorneys help clients with revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, Heggstad petitions, trust modifications, and petitions such as Heggstad and Heggstad-related filings. We emphasize clear communication, practical solutions, and careful preparation of court filings to help families resolve title issues efficiently. Clients can expect personalized attention to the details of each estate and proactive guidance through California probate court procedures when needed.
A Heggstad petition arises when property was intended to be held in a trust but remains titled in a decedent’s name or was transferred incorrectly. The petition asks the probate court to find that the asset vested in the decedent as trustee for the trust, rather than belonging to the decedent in a personal capacity. This remedy is commonly used to prevent assets from going through standard probate procedures and to honor the terms of an existing trust. The petition generally requires documentary evidence showing the decedent’s intent and contemporaneous steps taken to place the asset in the trust.
The Heggstad petition process typically involves gathering deeds, trust documents, declarations, and any correspondence showing intent to transfer property to the trust. The court considers whether clear and convincing evidence supports the claim that property was meant to be held by the trust. While each case depends on its facts, common examples include real property purchased by a trustee but recorded in the trustee’s individual name, or assets that were not formally retitled after a trust was created. Proper preparation of the petition and supporting exhibits increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling.
A Heggstad petition asks a California probate court to recognize that property titled in a decedent’s name was intended to be trust property. The petition derives its name from a controlling case law decision and serves to resolve title disputes without full probate administration when trust instruments and surrounding facts indicate the decedent’s intent. The court evaluates the evidence and may order that the property be transferred to the trustee or otherwise treated as part of the decedent’s trust estate. This process helps align asset ownership with the decedent’s estate planning documents and the trust terms.
A successful Heggstad petition generally requires clear documentary evidence of the trust, proof that the asset was intended to be held in trust, and a factual record showing consistent steps taken by the decedent to treat the asset as trust property. The court reviews deeds, trust agreements, payment records, title reports, and any declarations from involved parties. The petition is filed in the probate division of the county court with jurisdiction where the property is located or where the decedent resided. Properly drafted pleadings and organized exhibits streamline the court’s review and support a timely resolution.
Understanding terminology helps families and trustees navigate the petition process. Common terms include trustee, settlor, probate, vesting, title, pour-over will, and trust administration. Knowing these definitions clarifies roles and procedural steps in a Heggstad petition. The glossary below defines frequently used terms and explains how they relate to trust-related petitions and court filings in California. This foundational knowledge supports better decision making when addressing property that was intended to be held in a trust but was not properly titled at the time of death.
A trust is a legal arrangement where a person transfers assets to be managed by a trustee for the benefit of beneficiaries. In the context of a Heggstad petition, a revocable living trust is often the document at issue; it may contain instructions for managing and distributing property upon incapacity or death. Trusts are used to avoid probate, maintain privacy, and provide continuity in asset management. When property intended for a trust is titled incorrectly, a petition can help the court place the asset into the trust as originally intended by the trust creator.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing seeking a judicial determination that certain property should be treated as trust property despite being titled differently. This petition asks the probate court to correct the record and vest ownership in the trustee rather than in the decedent personally. The remedy is especially relevant when deeds or documents show the decedent acted as trustee or when payment records indicate trust funding, but formal title transfer was not completed. The petition helps restore alignment between the decedent’s intent and estate administration procedures.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a decedent’s assets that pass in the decedent’s name or by intestacy rather than through a trust. Probate can be time-consuming, public, and sometimes costly for families. One goal of trust-based planning is to avoid probate by ensuring assets are properly owned by a trust at death. When assets are titled improperly, a Heggstad petition may prevent those assets from entering probate by demonstrating intent to treat them as trust property, thereby keeping administration within the trust framework.
A pour-over will acts as a safety net to transfer assets to a trust upon a testator’s death when some property was not previously placed into the trust. While a pour-over will can direct property into a trust, assets that are probated can still be time-consuming to administer. A Heggstad petition can reduce reliance on probate by showing that certain assets were intended for the trust at the time of death, allowing those assets to be treated as trust property without the delays and public nature associated with probate proceedings.
When property is titled outside a trust, families can pursue different approaches: initiate probate administration, file a Heggstad petition to have the asset treated as trust property, or pursue other corrective deeds or transfers when possible. Probate is the formal process but tends to be public and may take months. A Heggstad petition can be a focused remedy that addresses ownership issues without opening a full probate estate. The appropriate choice depends on the type of asset, available evidence of intent, family goals, and the anticipated timeline for resolving title matters.
A limited approach like a Heggstad petition is often suitable when clear documentary evidence exists showing that the decedent intended an asset to be held in trust. Examples include deeds naming the decedent as trustee or payment records showing trust funds were used to acquire the property. When the facts and records align, the court may be persuaded to treat the asset as trust property without full probate. This path is typically faster and preserves privacy, as the petition focuses narrowly on legal ownership rather than distributing an entire estate.
A targeted petition can be effective when the issue involves a small number of assets or straightforward title irregularities, such as a deed recorded in the trustee’s individual name. In these scenarios, the court may correct ownership records based on the evidence presented, allowing the trustee to manage the assets under the trust terms. A limited approach reduces administrative expense and concentrates legal work on resolving the title problem rather than addressing broader estate distribution matters that would require comprehensive probate administration.
Comprehensive legal service may be necessary when title issues are complex, multiple parties claim ownership, or disputes arise among beneficiaries. Competing claims can require a more extensive court process, additional discovery, and coordination of related petitions or petitions to settle the estate. In such circumstances, careful case management and courtroom advocacy are important to resolve conflicting interests and protect the trust’s terms. Working through contested matters may involve in-depth factual investigation and skillful presentation of evidence to the court to establish appropriate relief.
When title problems affect retirement accounts, life insurance, or assets with tax consequences, a broader legal approach can be beneficial. Addressing property misclassification may require coordinating with accountants, trustees, and financial institutions to minimize tax exposure and ensure proper beneficiary designations. Comprehensive service helps integrate trust correction with other estate planning tasks such as trust modifications, petitions to transfer retirement plan assets, or resolving beneficiary disputes. This holistic view promotes consistent outcomes across the decedent’s estate plan and financial affairs.
A comprehensive approach combines trust correction petitions with estate administration planning, document review, and assistance coordinating transfers and filings. This strategy helps ensure that resolving one title issue does not unintentionally create other complications. It also supports smoother transitions for trustees and beneficiaries by addressing related items like pour-over wills, HIPAA authorizations, and guardianship nominations when relevant. Planning ahead reduces the chance of future disputes and aligns asset transfers with the decedent’s overall plan in a cohesive, well-documented manner.
Another advantage of a full-service approach is consistent communication and case coordination. When attorneys assist with Heggstad petitions alongside trust administration tasks, they can streamline interactions with banks, title companies, and courts. This unified handling reduces duplicative work, aids in creating a complete evidentiary record for petitions, and helps beneficiaries understand timelines and obligations. Families often find that having a single legal team managing interconnected matters reduces stress and leads to more predictable outcomes during what can be an emotionally challenging period.
By addressing title errors with Heggstad petitions and related filings, a comprehensive approach can reduce the assets subject to probate and help preserve privacy. Avoiding probate limits public filings and keeps sensitive financial details out of court records. For families seeking discretion, resolving property ownership through trust-based remedies allows the trustee to manage and distribute assets according to the trust terms. The result is a more private, efficient administration process that honors the decedent’s planning preferences without extensive public court supervision.
When a Heggstad petition places assets back into the trust, trustees can take control of those assets without the delays associated with probate. This can enable quicker access to funds needed for ongoing expenses, property maintenance, or distributions to beneficiaries in accordance with the trust. A comprehensive approach coordinates title corrections with administrative steps so trustees can act promptly and with legal authority. That practical benefit helps families meet immediate financial needs while preserving the integrity of the estate plan.
Start by collecting the trust instrument, deeds, closing statements, bank records, and any documents showing payments or title intentions. Organized documentation makes it easier to build a clear factual narrative showing the decedent’s intent to hold property in the trust. Detailed records such as purchase agreements, escrow statements, and loan documents can be vital. Timely organization also helps speed the petition process, reduces the likelihood of missing evidence, and supports efficient communication with courts, title companies, and other parties involved in resolving ownership questions.
Properly presenting a Heggstad petition requires focused legal documents and well-organized exhibits. Counsel can help identify the most persuasive evidence, prepare declarations from witnesses, and assemble chain-of-title documentation to support the claim that the asset was intended for the trust. Meticulous preparation increases the chance of a favorable ruling and reduces back-and-forth with the court. Legal representation also helps ensure the petition is filed in the proper jurisdiction and that procedural requirements are met to prevent delays or adverse rulings based on technical errors.
Consider a Heggstad petition if you discover property that was clearly intended for a decedent’s trust but remains titled in the decedent’s individual name or otherwise outside the trust. This often occurs with real estate, bank accounts, or asset accounts purchased by a trustee but recorded incorrectly. Filing a petition can return such assets to the trust, preventing probate and ensuring distributions follow the trust terms. It is also a useful option when parties seek a limited court determination rather than opening a full probate estate, preserving privacy and streamlining administration.
You may also consider this process when immediate access to trust-held assets is needed for mortgage payments, estate expenses, or ongoing bills, and probate timelines would create hardship. Additionally, when beneficiaries or trustees want clarity about title and legal control, a petition provides a judicial ruling that removes uncertainty. Discussing the facts with legal counsel helps determine whether a petition is the most efficient path or if alternative remedies like corrective deeds, beneficiary designation changes, or limited probate actions are more appropriate.
Typical circumstances include real estate purchases where the deed was recorded in the decedent’s personal name despite trust funding, bank or brokerage accounts opened without changing title to the trust, or property acquired shortly before death that was never retitled. Other examples include assets intended to be transferred via a pour-over will that need immediate trust recognition or transfers managed by an agent who failed to retitle assets. These scenarios create the need for a court determination to place the asset under trust control as originally intended.
A frequent occurrence is a property deed recorded in the decedent’s individual name though trust funds or a trustee performed the purchase. This discrepancy can create confusion over ownership at death. A Heggstad petition requests the court recognize the property as held in trust, allowing the trustee to manage or distribute it under the trust terms. Establishing contemporaneous evidence such as mortgage payments, purchase agreements, or escrow instructions supports the claim that the deed was intended to reflect the trustee’s role rather than personal ownership.
Bank or investment accounts are often overlooked during trust funding, leaving them in an individual’s name or with outdated beneficiary designations. When such accounts remain outside the trust, they may be subject to probate. A Heggstad petition or related court filing can clarify ownership and place those assets under the trust when evidence shows the intent to fund the trust. Timely review of account titles and beneficiary designations during estate planning helps reduce the need for petitions after death.
When property is acquired shortly before a decedent’s death and the title was not retitled in the trustee’s name, the asset can end up recorded in the decedent’s personal capacity. In such instances, a Heggstad petition can help the court determine that the property was meant for the trust, especially where purchase documents, financing records, or related documentation show trust involvement. Addressing these issues through a petition reduces delays and aligns the asset with the decedent’s estate plan for the benefit of beneficiaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides assistance to Pleasanton and East Bay clients seeking to correct title issues and preserve trust-based planning. We guide trustees and family members through evaluating evidence, preparing petitions, and communicating with courts and title companies. Our approach emphasizes clear documentation and practical strategies to achieve timely resolutions. Whether the matter is straightforward or involves contested claims, we work to protect trustee authority and beneficiary rights while minimizing delay and expense during the trust administration process.
Our firm focuses on estate planning and trust administration matters for clients in San Jose, Pleasanton, and surrounding communities. We help families navigate the procedural and evidentiary requirements for Heggstad petitions and related filings. By combining careful document review with clear explanations of court procedures, we assist trustees in assembling a persuasive record and advocating for title corrections. We emphasize practical solutions that align with a client’s goals and the decedent’s documented wishes, helping preserve the integrity of estate plans across asset types.
Clients receive hands-on support in collecting deeds, trust instruments, escrow records, and other evidence that demonstrates intent to fund a trust. We also coordinate with title companies and financial institutions as needed to process transfers and resolve encumbrances. Clear communication with beneficiaries and interested parties reduces misunderstandings and helps secure cooperative outcomes when possible. Our goal is to achieve efficient, legally sound resolutions that allow trustees to manage assets under the trust terms with confidence and clarity.
When court filings are necessary, we prepare precise petitions, declarations, and exhibits tailored to the governing law and local probate procedures. We aim to minimize delay and present the strongest possible case based on the available evidence. For families seeking to avoid unnecessary probate or to confirm trust ownership, this careful legal preparation supports timely rulings and helps protect beneficiaries’ interests while respecting the decedent’s estate plan.
Our process begins with a detailed review of the trust, deeds, purchase documents, and related records to determine if a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We then develop a plan to gather supporting evidence, prepare the petition and exhibits, and file in the appropriate probate court. We keep clients informed at each step, coordinate with other professionals as needed, and pursue the most efficient route to achieve title correction. This methodical approach helps ensure petitions are thorough and comply with local court expectations.
The initial phase focuses on understanding the facts and assembling the documents needed to support a petition. This includes locating the trust agreement, deeds, escrow records, payment histories, and any communications showing the decedent’s intent. We assess whether the evidence likely supports a Heggstad petition or whether alternative approaches are preferable. Clear identification of the asset in question and its title history is essential for preparing persuasive pleadings and exhibits to present to the probate court.
We carefully review trust documents and title records to determine how the asset was intended to be held and whether recorded deeds align with the trust. Finding documentary links between the purchase or funding of the asset and the trust’s terms strengthens the petition. We look for language naming the decedent as trustee, trust financial activity used to obtain the asset, and any contemporaneous evidence that the decedent treated the property as trust property prior to death. This review forms the factual backbone of the petition.
After identifying relevant documents, we compile supporting evidence such as escrow statements, canceled checks, loan documents showing trust as source of funds, and declarations from witnesses with firsthand knowledge. These exhibits are organized to present a clear narrative to the court. Declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals who observed the decedent’s intent can be particularly persuasive. Thorough evidence preparation helps the court evaluate ownership claims and increases the chance of favorable treatment for trust recognition.
With the evidence assembled, we draft the Heggstad petition, including a concise factual statement, legal basis for the request, and properly formatted exhibits. We ensure the petition is filed in the correct county and that required notices are provided to interested parties. Proper procedural steps are critical to avoid delays or objections based on technical grounds. Filing initiates the court’s consideration and may prompt responses or stipulations from other involved parties, which we manage strategically to advance resolution.
The drafted petition must present facts in a logical, well-supported manner so the court can readily evaluate the claim. We prepare pleadings that explain why the evidence shows the asset should be treated as trust property and include properly authenticated exhibits. Attention to detail in formatting, citations, and supporting declarations helps the court process the petition more efficiently and reduces the risk of disputes over procedural adequacy or evidentiary sufficiency.
After filing, proper notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties is essential. We manage service requirements and address any objections or inquiries that arise. In cases where parties agree, stipulated orders can expedite resolution. When disputes occur, we respond with well-documented positions and, if necessary, seek hearings to present the evidence. Clear communication and timely responses help keep the matter moving toward judicial determination or negotiated resolution.
Following filing and any necessary briefing, the court may schedule a hearing to evaluate the petition and supporting evidence. At the hearing, the judge considers the documentary record and any testimony or declarations. If the court finds in favor of the petition, it will issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property and directing any necessary title transfers. After obtaining an order, we assist with implementing changes, coordinating with title companies, and updating account registrations to reflect trust ownership.
At the court hearing, it is important to present a coherent narrative supported by exhibits and declarations. We prepare witnesses and organize the documentary record to make a persuasive showing of the decedent’s intent and the connection between the asset and the trust. A clear presentation helps the judge make an informed ruling without unnecessary delay. If the court requests additional information, we promptly produce follow-up materials and address questions to support the requested relief.
Once the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, the next step is implementing the order with title companies and financial institutions. We assist in transmitting certified court documents, preparing new deeds or transfer instruments when required, and coordinating with escrow or title companies to update property records. Proper implementation ensures that ownership records reflect the court’s determination and allows trustees to exercise control of trust assets consistent with the trust’s terms and the decedent’s intent.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to recognize that property recorded in a decedent’s individual name was actually intended to be trust property. The petition seeks an order directing that the asset be treated as part of the trust estate so that the trustee may manage or distribute it according to the trust terms. It is a focused remedy used when title discrepancies would otherwise frustrate trust administration or lead to probate. The petition relies on documentary and circumstantial evidence that demonstrates the decedent’s intent to have the property held by the trust. The court considers whether the submitted evidence shows clearly that the decedent acted in a way consistent with trust ownership. Supporting materials may include deeds, trust agreements, escrow and closing statements, payment records, and declarations from witnesses. When the record supports the claim, the court may issue an order recognizing trust ownership, which helps avoid the delays and publicity of probate for that specific asset while aligning outcomes with the decedent’s estate plan.
You should consider a Heggstad petition when you discover assets recorded in the decedent’s name that were intended to be in a revocable living trust or when the title does not reflect the trust funding despite evidence showing trust involvement. Common triggers include real estate purchased by a trustee but recorded personally, or accounts that were never retitled after trust creation. Discuss the facts with counsel to determine if a petition is appropriate, as the right remedy depends on the type of asset, available supporting documents, and family goals for administration. When evidence is strong and the item at issue is limited in scope, a Heggstad petition can be more efficient than opening a full probate estate, allowing trustees to access and manage trust assets more quickly. If competing claims exist or if the asset forms part of a broader estate dispute, a more comprehensive approach may be necessary. A review of documents and title history will help identify the best path forward and establish realistic timelines for resolution.
Evidence for a Heggstad petition should show the decedent’s intent and actions that treated the property as trust property. Useful documents include the trust agreement naming the decedent as trustee, recorded deeds showing trustee language, escrow and closing statements, canceled checks or loan documents indicating trust funds were used, and written communications reflecting intent. Declarations from individuals with direct knowledge of the decedent’s intent may further support the petition and help the court understand the circumstances surrounding the asset acquisition or title recording. Organizing and authenticating these materials is vital. The petition must present a clear factual narrative linking the asset to the trust and show why the record title does not reflect the decedent’s intent. Working with counsel to assemble, authenticate, and present exhibits in a logical order helps the court assess the claim efficiently and improves the likelihood of obtaining an order recognizing trust ownership.
The timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on document readiness, court schedules, and whether any parties contest the filing. If the petition is straightforward and uncontested, a resolution may be achieved in a matter of weeks to a few months, depending on local court timelines. Complex matters or contested petitions can extend longer, potentially taking several months if hearings, discovery, or additional briefing are required. Preparing a complete evidentiary record upfront helps shorten the overall timeline and reduces the likelihood of procedural delays. Local probate calendars and the court’s caseload influence scheduling. Promptly gathering necessary documents and working with counsel to file a well-supported petition reduces back-and-forth with the court and helps move the case forward. If the matter is contested, early communication with interested parties and attempts at stipulation can sometimes avoid lengthy litigation and expedite the court’s decision.
A Heggstad petition can prevent a specific asset from entering probate by asking the court to treat the asset as trust property. When successful, the order recognizes trust ownership and allows the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under trust terms rather than through probate procedures. However, the petition addresses ownership of particular assets and does not replace comprehensive estate administration when many assets are outside the trust. The overall goal is to preserve the benefits of a trust for the assets it was intended to hold. Whether probate is avoided entirely depends on the extent of assets outside the trust. If most property was properly funded into the trust and only limited items require correction, a petition may substantially reduce the scope of probate or eliminate the need to open probate for those items. Counsel can evaluate the entire estate and recommend whether targeted petitions or broader administration is the best route for each case.
Yes, beneficiaries or other interested parties can contest a Heggstad petition if they dispute the facts or claim alternative ownership rights. Contests may arise from conflicting title records, competing beneficiary claims, or differing interpretations of the decedent’s intent. When objections are filed, the court may require additional evidence, hold hearings, or order limited discovery to resolve factual disputes. The presence of disputes can extend the process and make careful, well-documented filings even more important to support the petitioner’s position. If a contest occurs, counsel will respond with evidence, declarations, and legal arguments to support the petition. Mediation or negotiated stipulations among parties can sometimes resolve disagreements without prolonged litigation. Engaging in open communication and providing clear documentary proof of intent often helps minimize conflicts and encourages cooperative resolution when possible.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the asset may remain subject to probate or require an alternative remedy to correct title. A denial can stem from insufficient evidence of intent or procedural defects in the filing. In such cases, counsel can evaluate options including collecting additional evidence, filing an amended petition, or pursuing probate administration if necessary. Understanding why the petition was denied is the first step toward formulating the next course of action to protect beneficiaries’ interests and address estate administration needs. When denial is due to lack of evidence, additional documentation or declarations may strengthen a renewed filing. If the issue involves contested ownership or complex title problems, a broader probate or civil action might be required. Counsel can advise on the most efficient and legally sound approach to achieve the desired outcome while considering timelines, costs, and the family’s objectives.
Heggstad petitions are encountered in Alameda County and across California when trust funding has not been completed or when title problems arise. While not every estate requires a petition, attorneys who handle estate planning and trust administration see these matters with some frequency, particularly when real property or recently acquired assets were not properly retitled. The prevalence of such petitions reflects common real-world issues in the transfer and funding of trusts, so families and trustees should be aware of this remedy when gaps in title appear. Local procedural practices vary among probate courts, so familiarity with Alameda County’s expectations can be important for timely and effective filings. Counsel experienced with local courts can prepare petitions that comply with procedural requirements and anticipate common questions judges may have, improving the likelihood of a favorable and efficient resolution for clients in the region.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the factual record, the amount of document assembly required, and whether any hearings or contested proceedings are necessary. Fees include court filing costs and legal fees for preparing pleadings, exhibits, and potential court appearances. A straightforward, uncontested petition will generally cost less than matters involving disputes or extensive evidentiary development. Discussing fee structures and expectations with counsel early helps families plan for associated expenses and understand potential cost drivers. Some tasks, such as obtaining certified copies of records, title reports, or property documents, involve additional out-of-pocket costs. Counsel can provide an estimate tailored to the facts and outline options for phased work to manage expenses. Transparent communication about anticipated steps and likely costs during the evaluation stage helps clients make informed decisions about pursuing a petition or alternative remedies.
To reduce the chance of needing a Heggstad petition later, ensure that trusts are properly funded while the trust creator is living. That means retitling real estate, bank and brokerage accounts, and other assets into the name of the trust or otherwise documenting beneficiary designations consistent with the trust. Regular reviews of estate plan documents and account titling help catch oversights and minimize the need for corrective court actions after death. Clear recordkeeping of transactions and funding steps also provides helpful evidence should questions arise. Additionally, keep copies of deeds, closing statements, trust instruments, and any correspondence with title companies or financial institutions showing intent to fund the trust. When major transactions occur near the end of life, taking extra steps to document the source of funds and the intended ownership can prevent future disputes. Proactive planning with counsel reduces the risk of title errors and supports smoother trust administration for family members.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas