If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Pleasanton, a trust modification petition may be the pathway to reflect new intentions or correct an outdated document. Trust modification petitions are formal requests submitted to the probate or superior court in Alameda County to alter the terms of a trust, address ambiguous provisions, or adapt the arrangement to new circumstances. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in San Jose, our approach centers on clear communication and careful review of your trust, related documents such as revocable living trusts or pour-over wills, and the legal standards in California to determine whether a petition is the appropriate route.
Many families in Pleasanton face changing circumstances that make a trust modification petition necessary, including beneficiary changes, relocation, tax planning adjustments, or error correction. Whether your situation involves an amendment that cannot be executed under the trust’s terms or a need to clarify trustee powers, the petition process provides a formal mechanism to request judicial approval. We explain the process in plain language, review related instruments like financial powers of attorney and health care directives, and help you gather the documentation needed to present a persuasive, legally sound request to the Alameda County court.
Filing a trust modification petition can protect your goals by aligning trust terms with current realities and preventing future disputes among beneficiaries or trustees. In California, certain changes or corrections cannot be achieved informally when the trust lacks amendment language or when key parties disagree. A successful petition provides clear court authorization for modifications, reducing ambiguity and promoting smooth administration. Beyond correcting drafting errors, petitions can address changed family dynamics, updates for suitability of appointed fiduciaries, or adjustments for financial and tax considerations, which helps preserve assets and honor the settlor’s intent with court-sanctioned certainty.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services to residents across Alameda County and the greater Bay Area, including Pleasanton. Our practice assists clients with a range of documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and trust certifications, and we handle trust modification petitions with attention to local court procedures. We place high value on client communication, detailed file preparation, and thoughtful advocacy, helping clients and families navigate the legal process while protecting assets and future distributions under California law. Our office can be reached at 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation in confidence.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court to change the terms or administration of a trust when informal amendment is impossible or contested. Under California law, courts may approve modifications to correct mistakes, address changed circumstances, or clarify ambiguous provisions when doing so aligns with the settlor’s probable intent. The petition process typically requires clear factual support, notice to interested parties, and evidence explaining why the requested change is appropriate. In many cases, resolving disputes through a petition can prevent prolonged conflicts and create an enforceable record of the revised trust terms.
Not every desired change requires a court petition; some trusts contain amendment clauses that allow the settlor to modify terms directly. A petition becomes necessary when amendment is restricted, when the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, or when co-trustees or beneficiaries dispute the proposed alteration. The petition must present legal grounds under California statutes and case law, and supporting documentation such as the original trust, amendments, and relevant financial records. Properly prepared petitions also address notice requirements so that all interested parties have an opportunity to respond before the court acts.
A trust modification petition asks a court to alter the legal structure or terms of a trust so that administration reflects changed needs or corrects errors. The petition explains the requested changes, offers evidence of the settlor’s intent or current circumstances, and asks the judge to enter an order that authorizes those changes. Common petition objectives include correcting scrivener’s errors, clarifying beneficiary designations, adjusting trustee powers, or adapting the trust to new tax or family situations. Once approved, the court order becomes part of the trust’s enforceable record and guides future administration by trustees and beneficiaries.
A successful trust modification petition typically includes several core elements: a clear statement of the requested change, factual support showing why the change is necessary or appropriate, copies of the trust and related documents, and notice to all interested parties. The process involves preparing the petition, filing it in the appropriate Alameda County court, serving notice on beneficiaries and trustees, and responding to any objections. The court will review evidence, consider legal standards, and may hold a hearing before issuing an order. Proper preparation helps streamline the process and reduces the likelihood of contested proceedings.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the petition process. Important concepts include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, amendment, modification, and probate court jurisdiction. Each has a specific legal meaning: the settlor is the person who created the trust, the trustee manages trust property, and beneficiaries receive trust benefits. Knowing these terms and how they relate to duties, notice requirements, and statutory standards under California law helps clients make informed decisions about whether a petition is the best step for their situation.
The settlor is the person who establishes the trust and sets its terms, naming trustees and beneficiaries while defining how assets are to be managed and distributed. The settlor’s intent is central to most trust disputes and is the guiding principle courts consider when evaluating modification petitions. When the settlor is alive and has capacity, amendments typically follow the trust’s procedures. When the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, courts may be asked to interpret or modify the trust to honor the settlor’s probable intent while balancing statutory requirements and the interests of beneficiaries.
The trustee holds legal title to trust assets for the benefit of the beneficiaries and has fiduciary duties such as loyalty, prudence, and impartiality. Trustees must follow the trust’s terms and applicable California law when managing assets, making distributions, and communicating with beneficiaries. If trust terms are unclear or if a trustee’s authority is in dispute, a petition can request clarification or modification of trustee powers. Trustees are also often required to provide notice and accountings during modification proceedings to ensure transparency and protect beneficiaries’ interests.
A beneficiary is someone entitled to receive assets or benefits under the trust according to its terms. Beneficiaries may be individuals, organizations, or entities, and they have legal interests that can be affected by modifications to the trust. When a petition is filed, interested beneficiaries must generally receive notice and are allowed to object to proposed changes. Ensuring beneficiary rights during the court process is essential to reaching a fair outcome and preventing future disputes over distributions or administration of trust property.
A trust amendment is a change made according to the trust’s own amendment provisions while the settlor has the authority to amend, whereas a trust modification often involves court action to alter terms when informal amendment is not possible. The court process can address issues like ambiguities, mistakes, or circumstances not contemplated in the original document. Understanding the distinction helps determine the appropriate route: follow the trust’s amendment language when available and uncontested, or pursue a modification petition when judicial approval is required to achieve a lawful and durable result.
When considering changes to a trust, clients often weigh informal amendment, a trust modification petition, or a petition for reformation. Informal amendment works when the settlor is able to act and the trust allows changes without court involvement. A modification petition is appropriate when amendment cannot be completed under the trust’s terms or when parties disagree. Reformation seeks to correct a trust to reflect the settlor’s true intent where drafting errors exist. Choosing the right option depends on the settlor’s status, the trust’s language, family dynamics, and the legal grounds available under California law.
Direct amendment is often sufficient when the settlor is alive, has capacity, and the trust permits changes without court intervention. In those cases, updating beneficiary designations, altering trustee appointments, or adjusting distribution schedules can be accomplished by following the amendment procedures spelled out in the trust document. This path is typically faster, less costly, and less public than seeking court approval. However, it requires that the trust’s amendment clause be clear and that all formalities — such as signing and witnessing requirements — are followed to ensure the amendment is legally effective and enforceable.
Minor clarifications or corrections that fall within the settlor’s direct authority often do not need a petition. Examples include updating contact information for trustees, clarifying distributions in line with existing language, or adjusting administrative details that do not alter fundamental beneficiary rights. Taking a limited approach conserves resources and preserves privacy, as court proceedings become part of the public record. It is important to confirm that proposed adjustments fit within the trust’s amendment power to avoid later disputes or challenges to the validity of the changes.
A comprehensive approach is warranted when multiple beneficiaries, co-trustees, or creditors have potentially competing interests that could complicate or derail simple amendment efforts. In such cases, careful legal analysis and coordinated filings may be needed to ensure notice requirements are met, objections are effectively addressed, and the court fully understands the proposed changes. Taking a thorough approach reduces the risk of unforeseen consequences, preserves fiduciary integrity, and seeks a durable solution that minimizes future litigation over trust terms or distributions among interested parties.
When trust language is unclear, contains drafting errors, or when there is evidence that the settlor’s intent was not properly memorialized, a comprehensive strategy including litigation-level preparation may be necessary. Reformation or modification petitions call for detailed factual records, often including declarations, correspondence, and financial documentation to support the requested changes. A complete review of related estate planning documents, such as wills and power of attorney forms, helps ensure consistency across the client’s overall plan and reduces the chance of conflicting instruments undermining the proposed modifications.
Employing a comprehensive approach to a trust modification petition often yields stronger, long-lasting outcomes by addressing factual and legal vulnerabilities upfront. Preparing a detailed petition and supporting evidence helps the court see the rationale for change and reduces opportunities for successful challenge by disgruntled beneficiaries. A robust record improves the chance of a favorable ruling and provides clear authority for trustees to act on the revised terms without fear of later liability. Comprehensive preparation also includes managing notification and procedural compliance to avoid technical issues that could delay resolution.
A methodical strategy also enhances communication among the parties and may facilitate negotiated resolutions before court hearings become necessary. By analyzing alternative dispute resolution options, clarifying trustee duties, and ensuring that other estate documents are aligned with the proposed modification, clients can achieve durable outcomes that reflect current family and financial realities. Ultimately, a comprehensive petition that anticipates likely objections and addresses them with legal and factual support reduces the chance of protracted litigation and protects the trust assets for intended beneficiaries.
Court-approved modifications provide a clear, enforceable record that guides trustees and beneficiaries and reduces ambiguity about future distributions and trustee authority. This legal certainty protects trustees who act pursuant to the court order and provides beneficiaries with assurance that the change has judicial backing. By securing formal approval, parties avoid repeated disputes over interpretation and administration that can drain estate assets. Clear directives from the court help maintain continuity in trust management, particularly when financial institutions or third parties require documented authorization to effect transfers or changes in account ownership.
A carefully prepared petition anticipates common objections and addresses procedural and substantive concerns that might otherwise lead to future litigation. By involving all necessary parties, providing full disclosure, and aligning the modification with statutory standards, the court process helps minimize grounds for successful challenges later. This reduces emotional and financial strain on families and helps preserve assets for the beneficiaries rather than depleting them through disputes. A thorough approach also sets a precedent for clear administration, supporting trust continuity across changing personal circumstances.
Start by collecting all trust-related documents, including the original trust, amendments, pour-over wills, certification of trust, and any correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. Financial records, account statements, and property deeds help illustrate asset ownership and administration history. Providing a comprehensive file from the outset reduces delays and allows the petition to present a clear factual narrative to the court. Thorough documentation also supports notice requirements and helps opposing parties evaluate the proposed changes, which may encourage negotiated resolutions before court hearings are necessary.
When parties are open to discussion, exploring mediation or negotiated settlement can produce mutually acceptable modifications without a contested court hearing. Alternative dispute resolution can be less adversarial, preserve family relationships, and reduce legal costs while achieving practical results. If negotiation proves unsuccessful, the settlement efforts and mediation records can still inform the court and may be presented as evidence of attempts to resolve differences. Considering ADR early demonstrates a commitment to practical resolution and may lead to a faster, less public outcome for the trust modification matter.
Life changes often motivate trust modifications: marriage, divorce, births, deaths, relocation, or significant shifts in financial circumstances can make the original trust terms outdated or inconsistent with current goals. When the settlor cannot implement changes directly or when the trust’s language is ambiguous, a petition to the court can provide a lawful mechanism to align the trust with present needs. Additionally, if errors in drafting create unintended consequences or if trustee authority needs clarification, the petition process can establish a durable, enforceable solution that protects beneficiaries and directs future administration.
Other reasons to pursue a modification petition include resolving disputes among potential beneficiaries, addressing creditor claims, or correcting clerical errors that affect asset distribution. Court approval is particularly useful where institutions require judicial authorization to accept revised instructions or when estate tax, retirement plan, or insurance arrangements must be coordinated with trust changes. By taking action through the appropriate legal channels in Alameda County, Pleasanton residents can secure clear court orders that guide trustees and protect the intent of the estate plan over time.
Typical circumstances prompting petitions include incorrect beneficiary designations, ambiguous distribution language, trustee incapacity or removal, and the need to adapt to tax law changes. Other common scenarios involve discovering a drafting mistake, addressing changed family relationships like divorce or remarriage, or reconciling conflicts between a trust and a pour-over will. Each situation requires careful factual support and legal analysis to determine whether a petition is appropriate and which remedy — modification, reformation, or clarification — best protects the settlor’s intent and the beneficiaries’ interests.
When a trust contains ambiguous language or clear drafting errors that affect distributions or trustee duties, a petition can ask the court to correct or clarify the terms. Evidence such as contemporaneous notes, drafts, or communications may help demonstrate the settlor’s intent. The court evaluates such evidence in light of statutory standards and may grant reformation or modification when the record supports the requested change. Addressing these issues through a petition prevents misinterpretation during administration and reduces the likelihood of harmful disputes among beneficiaries in the future.
Life changes such as births, deaths, divorce, or remarriage can alter the fairness or practicality of original trust terms. When those changes make the trust inconsistent with current goals or family needs, a petition can request updates to beneficiary allocations, trustee appointments, or distribution plans. The court will consider the settlor’s intent and whether the requested modifications preserve that intent while adapting to changed circumstances. Thoughtful petitions balance legal standards with the family’s present needs to arrive at sustainable, enforceable outcomes that reflect contemporary realities.
Disputes regarding a trustee’s authority, alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, or practical difficulties in administering trust assets can necessitate court intervention. A petition may seek to clarify trustee powers, remove or replace a trustee, or authorize specific actions where the trust’s terms are unclear. Providing detailed records of administration, accountings, and communications supports requests for judicial relief and helps the court ensure that trust property is managed in the beneficiaries’ best interests in accordance with the trust instrument and California law.
We assist clients in Pleasanton and the surrounding Alameda County communities with trust modification petitions tailored to their individual circumstances. Our approach emphasizes thorough document review, practical guidance about available remedies, and clear communication throughout the court process. Whether you are correcting a drafting error, seeking clarification of trustee powers, or responding to contested changes, we help assemble the factual support required by the court and coordinate notice to interested parties so the petition proceeds with appropriate transparency and legal rigor.
Our firm focuses on helping families and individuals across San Jose and Alameda County navigate complex trust matters, including petitions for modification or reformation. We prioritize patient, clear communication to explain options, timelines, and likely outcomes under California law. From preparing the initial petition to coordinating service and evidence, we aim to provide steady guidance through each stage of the court process. Clients benefit from our methodical preparation and our attention to aligning a modification with the settlor’s intent while protecting trustee and beneficiary interests.
We understand how sensitive trust matters can be for families in Pleasanton and beyond. Our goal is to reduce stress by managing procedural requirements, preparing persuasive factual support, and pursuing resolutions that reflect current objectives and legal standards. We review related estate planning documents—such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and power of attorney forms—to ensure the modification fits within the broader estate plan. Wherever possible, we also explore options to resolve disputes outside of court to preserve relationships and reduce expense.
Accessibility and responsiveness are important to our clients. We make ourselves available to discuss concerns, explain required filings, and advise on the likely steps in Alameda County courts. If litigation becomes necessary, we prepare a clear case record designed to address common objections and procedural challenges. For initial consultations or to begin preparing documentation for a trust modification petition, prospective clients in Pleasanton may contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at 408-528-2827 to schedule a confidential discussion.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to understand the trust, the requested change, and the parties involved. We review pertinent documents—trust instruments, amendments, deeds, financial records, and related wills—to build a factual record. After confirming whether a petition is necessary, we prepare and file the petition with the Alameda County court, manage service and notice to interested parties, and handle correspondence or objections. Throughout, we provide clear updates and explain options for settlement or court hearings, aiming for an efficient and legally sound resolution.
Initial evaluation focuses on inspecting the trust documents, understanding the settlor’s intent, and determining whether amendment is possible without court action. We collect evidence that supports a petition, such as prior drafts, correspondence, and account histories, and identify all interested parties who must be notified. This stage is vital to establishing a coherent legal strategy and anticipating potential objections from beneficiaries or trustees. A careful review reduces surprises later in the process and helps shape a petition that addresses legal standards under California law.
We compile the trust, amendments, certificates of trust, related wills, powers of attorney, and any relevant financial records. Gathering declarations, correspondence, and contemporaneous notes helps support the factual basis for the requested change. This documentation forms the backbone of the petition and helps the court understand the settlor’s intent and the reasons for modification. Thorough evidence gathering also supports required notice and helps identify parties who will need formal service, reducing the risk of procedural defects that could delay the case.
After assembling documents, we analyze applicable statutes and case law to determine the strongest legal bases for the requested modification. This includes evaluating whether reformation, clarification, or another remedy is appropriate, and considering potential defenses or objections. A clear strategy guides petition drafting, evidentiary planning, and anticipated settlement discussions. Developing the strategy early helps clients understand likely timelines, costs, and outcomes, and positions the petition to address key issues the Alameda County court will consider when evaluating the request.
Once the petition and supporting declarations are prepared, we file the petition in the appropriate Alameda County court and arrange for formal service on all interested parties in compliance with California procedural rules. Accurate service and documented proof of notice are essential to prevent challenges on procedural grounds. During this phase, we also seek any necessary interim relief and monitor responses or objections, engaging in settlement discussions if parties are willing to negotiate and avoid contested hearings.
Filing requires meeting local court formatting, filing fee, and document requirements, including attaching the trust and supporting declarations. Properly prepared submissions explain the requested relief and provide a factual record for the judge. We ensure all necessary exhibits and declarations are included so the court has a complete picture of the requested modification. Attention to procedural detail reduces administrative delays and positions the petition for timely consideration by the judge assigned to the matter.
After filing, timely and correct service to beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested individuals is required under California law. We manage service logistics and prepare proofs of service for the court record. If objections arise, we evaluate their merits, respond with supporting evidence, and pursue settlement where feasible. When objections persist, we prepare for hearings by developing clear witness declarations and legal arguments to present the factual and legal basis for the requested modification, aiming to demonstrate why the court should grant the petition.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present arguments and supporting evidence to the judge, address any objections, and request an order modifying the trust as proposed. The court’s order, if granted, becomes part of the trust’s enforceable record. After receiving a favorable order, we assist with implementing the modification by updating trust records, notifying financial institutions, and advising trustees on carrying out the changes consistent with the court’s directive. Proper implementation ensures the modification functions as intended for future administration.
Hearing preparation includes assembling declarations, exhibits, and legal arguments tailored to the court’s standards. We organize the factual narrative to show why the modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and why judicial intervention is appropriate. Presenting evidence clearly and addressing expected objections helps the judge evaluate the request efficiently. During hearings, we advocate for the requested relief, clarify complex issues for the court, and propose specific order language that the trustee can rely upon when implementing the changes in trust administration.
Once a court order issues, practical steps follow: the trustee updates trust records, provides beneficiaries with notice of the change, and coordinates with banks, title companies, or retirement plan administrators to effect transfers or re-titling consistent with the order. We assist in preparing the necessary documentation, such as certified copies of the order and updated certification of trust, to present to financial institutions. Taking these steps promptly helps ensure the trust modification operates as intended and reduces the chance of administrative errors.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to a court to change or clarify the terms or administration of a trust when informal amendment is unavailable or disputed. The petition sets out the specific changes sought, the factual basis for those changes, and asks the judge to issue an order authorizing the modification. Common reasons for petitions include correcting drafting errors, clarifying ambiguous provisions, or adapting the trust to changed personal or financial circumstances that the original document did not anticipate. A petition becomes necessary when the trust lacks an effective amendment clause, the settlor cannot or will not amend the trust directly, or when beneficiaries or trustees disagree about proposed changes. The process requires careful evidence collection, proper notice to interested parties, and compliance with Alameda County court procedures. A well-prepared petition can secure a clear court order that guides trustees and protects beneficiaries’ interests.
The timeline for a trust modification petition in Alameda County varies based on case complexity, the court’s calendar, and whether the petition is contested. Simple, uncontested petitions can sometimes be resolved within a few months, while contested matters that require hearings, expert testimony, or extensive briefing may take longer. Factors that affect timing include the need to gather records, serve notice on all interested parties, and address any objections that arise during the notice period. Prompt, organized preparation often shortens delays by presenting a complete factual record and minimizing procedural defects. Engaging in settlement discussions or alternative dispute resolution early can also reduce the time to resolution. Clients should expect the firm to provide regular updates and realistic timelines based on the particulars of their case and current court availability.
Notice requirements are a key part of the petition process, and interested parties typically include current trustees, all named beneficiaries, and any persons who might reasonably have an interest in the trust’s administration, such as contingent beneficiaries. Institutions with an interest in trust assets may also require notice. Proper service ensures parties have an opportunity to respond or object and helps prevent procedural challenges that could impact the petition’s validity. Identifying and serving the correct parties requires a careful review of the trust and related documents to determine who qualifies as an interested person under California law. The petition must include proof of service on the court record, demonstrating that notice was provided in accordance with statutory and local rules.
Trustees can exercise powers granted by the trust document and by law, but they cannot unilaterally change fundamental terms affecting beneficiaries’ interests unless the trust explicitly grants them that authority. If the trust contains clear amendment provisions and the settlor retains the right to amend, changes may be made without court involvement. However, when amendment language is absent, limited, or disputed, trustee-directed changes can expose the trustee to challenges and potential liability. When authority is unclear or contested, seeking court guidance through a modification petition provides formal approval and protection for trustees acting under the court’s order. This approach reduces uncertainty and helps ensure changes are implemented in a way that beneficiaries and third parties will recognize as valid.
Supportive evidence for a petition may include the original trust and any amendments, drafts or prior versions that reflect the settlor’s intent, contemporaneous correspondence or notes, financial records showing asset ownership, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to relevant facts. Documentary evidence that explains why the existing language is inconsistent with the settlor’s objectives strengthens a petition, as does evidence of changed circumstances that justify the requested modification. Courts weigh the totality of the evidence, so assembling a comprehensive record is essential. In some cases, forensic or financial documentation may be useful to clarify asset ownership or to show how intended distributions were frustrated by errors in the trust instrument, supporting the need for judicial correction or reformation.
Court petitions are generally part of the public record, and trust modification proceedings filed in Alameda County courts typically become accessible to members of the public. For clients concerned about privacy, the trade-off between confidentiality and the need for a court order must be considered. In some situations, redaction of certain sensitive information or limited scope filings may reduce exposure, but full confidentiality cannot be guaranteed once matters are entered into the court docket. Discussing privacy concerns early allows the petition to be tailored where possible to minimize unnecessary disclosure while still providing the court with the factual detail necessary to consider the requested relief. Exploring settlement or ADR options can also limit public filings and preserve greater privacy for involved parties.
Disputes among beneficiaries are often resolved through negotiation, mediation, or, if necessary, court proceedings. Mediation can help parties reach a compromise that reflects shared interests and avoids the adversarial expense of litigation, while court resolution provides a definitive legal outcome when parties cannot agree. The appropriate path depends on family dynamics, the strength of legal positions, and the willingness of parties to cooperate. When litigation becomes necessary, a well-prepared petition and supporting evidence improve the likelihood of a favorable court decision. Regardless of the route, transparent communication and documented offers to mediate can demonstrate good faith efforts to resolve disputes, which courts may view favorably during contested proceedings.
If a beneficiary objects to the proposed modification, the objection is presented to the court as part of the procedural phase for the petition. The objecting party must provide grounds for their opposition, and the petitioner then has an opportunity to respond with evidence and legal arguments addressing the objections. The court evaluates both sides and will decide whether the proposed modification is consistent with applicable legal standards and the settlor’s probable intent. Objections do not automatically defeat a petition, but they can result in additional hearings, extended discovery, and increased costs. Early efforts to resolve objections through discussion or mediation can often avoid protracted litigation and lead to outcomes that preserve relationships while achieving a workable modification.
Modifications to a trust can affect other estate planning documents such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, health care directives, and beneficiary designations on retirement accounts. It is important to review the entire estate plan to ensure consistency among instruments so that changes to the trust do not create conflicts or unintended gaps. Coordination helps ensure that the settlor’s comprehensive plan functions cohesively after the modification is implemented. When a court approves a modification, we advise clients to update related documents and notify institutions as necessary, including banks, title companies, and retirement plan administrators. Proactive review reduces the likelihood of distribution problems or misunderstandings during trust administration.
To begin the process of filing a trust modification petition, gather all relevant trust documents, related estate planning instruments, financial records, and any correspondence that helps explain the settlor’s intent or the reasons for modification. Contact our office to schedule a confidential consultation so we can review the documentation and recommend the appropriate course of action under California law. Early dialogue helps determine whether amendment, modification, or reformation is the correct remedy for your situation. Once we agree on the strategy, we prepare the petition, arrange for required notice and service, and manage filings with Alameda County courts. We also explore settlement possibilities to reduce time and expense, while preparing a complete factual record to support the petition if court consideration becomes necessary.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas