A Heggstad petition can be an essential legal remedy when real property intended to be held by a living trust was never properly transferred into the trust’s name. In Sutter Creek and throughout Amador County, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman help clients understand how a petition under the Heggstad case may confirm trust ownership of property despite paperwork errors. This introduction explains the basics of the petition, common situations that lead to its use, and how it can simplify settling an estate or clarifying title when deed formalities were overlooked or incomplete.
Many families discover during estate administration or planning that property deeds were not updated to show a trustee as owner, creating uncertainty over who holds title. A properly prepared Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that property is trust property based on intent and supporting documents, avoiding lengthy probate or title disputes. The process requires careful documentation, clear presentation of intent, and familiarity with California trust and property law. This paragraph outlines how a petition can restore intended trust ownership and reduce delay and confusion for beneficiaries and trustees.
Filing a Heggstad petition can bring clarity and stability to estate plans when administrative errors left title in a decedent’s individual name. By asking a court to recognize trust ownership, the petition can prevent probate, remove clouds on title, and enable trustees to manage or sell property consistent with the settlor’s intentions. For family members and fiduciaries, this legal step reduces uncertainty, preserves property value, and supports efficient trust administration. When documentation supports transfer intent, a petition often provides a practical and legally recognized path to correct oversight without disrupting the underlying estate plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman handle a full range of estate planning and trust administration matters, including petitions to confirm trust ownership of real property. With years of practice in California estate law, the firm focuses on practical solutions tailored to individual family circumstances across Amador County and surrounding areas. Clients receive careful review of deeds, trust instruments, and other supporting documents to build a persuasive record for the court. The office also advises on complementary estate planning documents, such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and certification of trust, to prevent future title issues.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request filed in probate court to establish that certain property belonged to a trust despite the absence of a recorded deed in the trust’s name. The petition relies on written or circumstantial evidence showing the settlor intended the property to be trust property, often including trust documents, transfer instruments, mortgage payoffs, insurance policies, and communications indicating intent. Courts evaluate the totality of the evidence to determine whether title should be treated as belonging to the trust. Understanding this process helps trustees and beneficiaries decide whether a petition or another remedy suits their situation.
The petition process typically includes gathering documents, drafting a clear petition, filing with the appropriate California court, and giving notice to interested parties. Opposing claims or title defects may require additional hearings or evidence. Timeframes vary depending on court calendars and the complexity of disputes, and careful preparation is essential to minimize delays. For trustees, initiating a Heggstad petition can prevent longer probate proceedings, clarify asset ownership for administration, and facilitate transactions involving real estate that otherwise would be encumbered by uncertain title.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to treat property as if it had been properly transferred to a trust when the settlor’s intent and supporting evidence indicate that transfer was intended but a deed was not recorded. The underlying principle is equitable recognition of the settlor’s plan where formalities were imperfect. The court examines the trust document, any transfer instruments, correspondence, and conduct of the parties. When successful, the petition results in an order clarifying title and allowing trustees to manage or dispose of the property in accordance with the trust, aligning legal title with estate planning goals.
Preparing a persuasive Heggstad petition involves assembling multiple corroborating items: the trust instrument, any attempted transfer documents, evidence of how the property was managed or represented as trust property, proof of payment of mortgage or insurance from trust funds, and witness or beneficiary statements supporting intent. The drafting process must present a clear factual narrative and legal argument showing why the court should recognize trust ownership. Notice to heirs and potential interested parties is required. Thoughtful organization of evidence and careful legal drafting improve the likelihood of a favorable ruling and help avoid contested litigation.
Understanding common terms used in trust transfer and Heggstad petition proceedings helps clients follow the process and know what documents matter. Important terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, deed, title, probate, and trust instrument. Familiarity with these terms clarifies the roles and responsibilities involved, the types of evidence courts consider, and the practical consequences of various orders. This glossary section provides plain-language explanations so that trustees and family members can participate confidently in the process and make informed decisions about filing a petition or pursuing alternative remedies.
A settlor is the person who creates a trust and transfers assets into it during life or by will. In Heggstad petition matters, the settlor’s intent is central: the court looks to whether the settlor intended that a particular property become trust property. Statements, draft deeds, trust amendments, and conduct such as payment of expenses from trust funds can all shed light on intent. Establishing the settlor’s clear intention supports a petition to recognize trust ownership even when a deed was not properly recorded, aligning legal title with the settlor’s estate plan and beneficiaries’ expectations.
A trustee is the individual or entity designated to hold and manage trust property on behalf of the beneficiaries. Trustees have a duty to administer trust assets according to the trust terms and in the best interests of beneficiaries. When property intended for a trust remains in a settlor’s individual name, a trustee may seek a Heggstad petition to confirm trust ownership so they can carry out their responsibilities. Documentation demonstrating the trustee’s management or direction over the property can support a court’s determination that the asset belongs to the trust.
A deed is the legal instrument used to transfer ownership of real property, and title refers to the recognized ownership rights. A recorded deed in the trustee’s name provides clear evidence that property belongs to a trust. When that recording did not occur, courts will consider other evidence of intent to transfer. A Heggstad petition asks the court to treat title as if a proper deed had been recorded, based on the settlor’s trust documents and other corroborating proof. Clarifying title through court order allows trustees to manage, refinance, or sell property without the obstacle of ambiguous ownership.
Probate is the court-supervised process to distribute assets owned in an individual’s name at death, while nonprobate transfers occur outside probate, often through trusts or beneficiary designations. A Heggstad petition aims to keep property out of probate by proving it was intended to be trust property, thereby allowing distribution according to trust terms. Achieving a nonprobate transfer via court recognition of trust ownership typically saves time and expense compared with full probate, helps maintain privacy, and aligns administration with the settlor’s estate planning objectives.
Clients facing title issues can consider a Heggstad petition, probate, or other remedies such as corrective deeds or quiet title actions. Each option has distinct costs, timelines, and evidentiary requirements. A Heggstad petition targets the court’s equitable powers to align title with trust intent when formalities were imperfect. Probate may be lengthier and more public but could be necessary in some cases. Quiet title actions address disputes over ownership but may not directly address trust intent in the same way. Choosing the right path depends on documentation, potential opposition, and long-term estate planning goals.
When the trust instrument, a draft or signed deed, and consistent records clearly show the settlor intended the property to be trust property, a straightforward corrective deed or filing may be sufficient. If the transfer oversight is undisputed and all interested parties agree, a limited administrative step can confirm ownership without a contested court proceeding. This approach reduces expense and delay when documents and parties align. However, careful documentation and appropriate recording are necessary to ensure the corrective measure fully protects title and later transactions involving the property.
When beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties accept the transfer and there is no competing claim, parties may proceed with simple corrective measures. Cooperation allows filing an amicable petition or obtaining a corrective deed with the concurrence of those with an interest in the property. This cooperative path minimizes court involvement and can expedite the process. Even in uncontested situations, proper legal documentation and correct recording remain important to prevent future disputes and ensure that subsequent purchasers or lenders recognize clear title in the trust.
A comprehensive legal approach, such as filing a formal Heggstad petition, becomes necessary when heirs or other parties dispute ownership or when the documentary record is ambiguous. In those circumstances, thorough legal preparation and court advocacy help assemble evidence, present witness statements, and address counterclaims. The court process can resolve contested issues of intent and ownership in a binding manner. While more involved than corrective filings, this approach provides finality and a clear legal record to protect trustees and beneficiaries moving forward.
Complexities such as outstanding liens, mortgage issues, or third-party claims often require a detailed legal strategy and court orders to clear title. Comprehensive representation addresses investigative needs, negotiates with lenders or claimants, and seeks the appropriate judicial remedy, which may include the Heggstad petition or related actions. This thorough approach protects trustees from future challenges and ensures that title is marketable for sale or refinancing. Careful coordination with title companies and lenders is also an important component of resolving intricate title problems.
A comprehensive legal approach helps achieve a durable court order that aligns legal title with the settlor’s estate plan and reduces the likelihood of future disputes. Court recognition of trust ownership provides a formal, recorded basis for trustees to administer property, sell real estate, or refinance under the trust’s authority. This clarity can protect beneficiaries and fiduciaries, streamline trust administration, and ensure transactions proceed smoothly with title companies and lenders. The investment in a careful, complete legal strategy can prevent costly litigation or title challenges later on.
Comprehensive handling also includes meticulous evidence gathering and clear communication with all interested parties, which helps avoid surprises and clarifies expectations. Legal counsel coordinates notice requirements, prepares persuasive pleadings, and manages procedural steps so the process moves efficiently. For families who value certainty and continuity, a thorough approach reduces stress and administrative burdens, allowing trustees to concentrate on carrying out the trust’s terms rather than addressing unresolved title issues or intermittent challenges that might otherwise arise.
Securing a court order through a thorough petition process reduces the risk that later parties will challenge ownership, making title marketable and transactions more straightforward. A judicial determination that property belongs to the trust creates a public record that title insurers and lenders can rely on. This protection is particularly valuable when high-value real estate or complex family dynamics are involved. By addressing potential disputes proactively and documenting the legal basis for trust ownership, trustees can preserve the value of trust assets and minimize the prospect of contentious litigation in the future.
When trust ownership is judicially recognized, trustees gain the ability to manage, sell, or refinance property without delays linked to title uncertainty. That operational flexibility supports timely estate administration, enables beneficiaries to access funds or distributions under the trust terms, and facilitates practical decisions about maintaining or disposing of assets. By removing legal obstacles upfront, a comprehensive approach saves time and often reduces total cost compared with piecemeal remedies or repeated disputes, making it easier to achieve the settlor’s wishes for asset distribution.
Begin your matter by collecting the trust document, any attempted transfer deeds, mortgage payoff records, insurance policies, tax records, and communications that reference the property as trust-owned. Documents that show payment of expenses from trust accounts or that identify the trustee in dealings about the property are particularly helpful. A comprehensive record helps establish intent and can shorten the court process. Early organization of these materials also speeds up legal review and helps identify whether a simple corrective filing or a formal petition is the appropriate step for resolving the title issue.
Engage title companies and lenders early to understand any recording or title requirements and to determine what documentation they will accept to insure or refinance property once ownership is clarified. Lenders may have specific procedures for recognizing trustee authority or removing a grantor’s name from mortgage responsibilities. Title insurers often require a court order or corrected deed before issuing a standard policy. Coordinating these steps in advance avoids last-minute obstacles when transactions occur after a petition is resolved and helps ensure the property remains marketable.
Consider a Heggstad petition when important property intended for a trust remains titled in a settlor’s name and you need a reliable legal determination of ownership. This scenario commonly arises when deeds were not recorded after trust creation or when property was purchased before a trust was established and no corrective deed was executed. A petition can preserve the settlor’s intentions and avoid probate. Trustees may use this remedy to ensure they can manage or transfer property consistent with the trust, protecting beneficiaries and simplifying administration under the trust’s terms.
You should also consider a petition if title defects interfere with refinancing, sale, or estate settlement, or if another party challenges the trust’s claim to property. When heirs or third parties threaten to contest ownership, seeking a judicial declaration can provide finality. Even in less contested matters, filing a petition can create an authoritative public record that clarifies ownership, supports transactions, and avoids recurring questions about title. The decision to proceed should account for the strength of documentation, potential opposition, and the long-term goals for the property and trust administration.
Typical circumstances include a property that was meant to be transferred into a living trust but remained in the settlor’s name due to oversight, changes in ownership structure without updated deeds, or purchases made prior to trust formation. Other scenarios involve sales or title transfers where paperwork was incomplete, or a trustee discovered the issue while administering a decedent’s trust. When these events create uncertainty about legal ownership, a petition helps resolve the problem so trustees can manage assets and carry out the trust according to the settlor’s intentions.
A frequent situation is that a settlor signed a deed or intended to transfer property to a trust, but the deed was never recorded. Recording is the step that updates public title records and protects subsequent transactions, and failure to record leaves ownership in question. A Heggstad petition can demonstrate the settlor’s intent and other supporting facts to obtain court recognition that the property belonged to the trust. This legal remedy helps trustees proceed with administrative tasks and prevents later claims that could disrupt the estate plan.
When property was acquired before the trust was created and the owner neglected to execute a corrective deed afterward, title remains in the individual’s name. During trust administration or estate planning revisions, that oversight becomes problematic. A petition shows that the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust and asks the court to treat title accordingly. This approach avoids full probate and aligns asset ownership with the existing trust document, allowing trustees to manage the property under the trust terms without the delay and expense of additional proceedings.
Family transfers, name changes, or changes in property ownership structure sometimes occur without subsequent updates to recorded deeds. These inconsistencies create uncertainty at the time of estate administration. A Heggstad petition gathers evidence of the settlor’s intended ownership and seeks a judicial order clarifying title. Resolving these inconsistencies under court supervision protects trustees and beneficiaries, provides clear direction for how the asset should be handled, and helps avoid later disputes that might arise when title records do not reflect the true estate planning arrangement.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers local representation for Heggstad petitions and related trust matters in Sutter Creek and throughout Amador County. The firm assists trustees, beneficiaries, and family members with document review, strategic advice, and filing the necessary petitions in the appropriate court. Practical, responsive legal assistance helps clients meet notice requirements, gather supporting evidence, and navigate any opposition. The goal is to obtain a clear legal determination that allows trustees to manage property and carry out the settlor’s intentions with minimal delay and expense.
Clients seek the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for a combination of practical legal guidance and a thorough approach to trust title issues. The firm reviews trust instruments, deeds, and related records to develop a cohesive strategy for proving intent and correcting title problems. Attention to procedural requirements and careful preparation of petitions and supporting exhibits increases the likelihood of an efficient resolution. The office works with clients to minimize disruption to beneficiaries and preserve the value of trust assets while advancing the settlor’s estate planning goals.
The firm’s approach emphasizes communication with trustees, beneficiaries, and other interested parties to identify the most effective path forward. Whether the matter can be resolved through corrective documents, cooperation among parties, or requires a court petition, the firm lays out options and anticipated outcomes so clients can make informed decisions. Coordination with title companies, lenders, and court clerks is also part of the service, ensuring that orders or corrected deeds are recorded properly and that subsequent transactions proceed as intended without lingering title concerns.
For clients in Sutter Creek and beyond, the firm handles the procedural elements of Heggstad petitions and related estate planning updates, such as drafting pour-over wills, certification of trust, powers of attorney, and advance health care directives. The goal is to resolve present title issues and prevent future complications by aligning recorded property ownership with the overall estate plan. Practical counsel and a steady focus on documentation help families protect assets, clarify trustee authority, and move forward with trust administration in an orderly manner.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and document review to identify the nature of the title issue and the evidence available to support a Heggstad petition. We evaluate the trust instrument, any deeds, and records showing payment of property expenses to determine the most appropriate remedy. After advising clients on options, we prepare a plan that may include securing witness statements, coordinating with title professionals, drafting the petition, and handling required notices and court filings. Throughout, we keep clients informed about timelines and next steps.
The first step is to collect and review all relevant documents to assess the strength of a petition. This includes the trust instrument, deeds, mortgage and insurance records, tax bills, correspondence, and any evidence of payments made from trust accounts. We also identify interested parties who must be notified and evaluate potential objections. A careful assessment at this stage helps determine whether an uncontested corrective deed or a formal Heggstad petition is appropriate to align title with the settlor’s intent and to protect the trust’s ability to manage the property.
Collecting trust documents, deeds, and property records creates the factual backbone of a petition. Evidence that the settlor treated the property as trust-owned, such as records showing payment of mortgage or taxes from trust funds, or correspondence referring to the property as belonging to the trust, can be persuasive. We assist in identifying and organizing these materials, which often include past statements, insurance documents, and related filings. A well-organized evidentiary record streamlines drafting and improves the clarity of the narrative presented to the court.
Identifying beneficiaries, heirs, lienholders, and others with an interest in the property is essential because proper notice is required for court proceedings. We prepare and serve notices in accordance with statutory requirements and ensure all potential claimants receive information about the petition. Adequate notice is critical to the validity of the court’s determination and helps avoid future challenges. Early engagement with interested parties can also reveal opportunities for settlement or clarification without prolonged litigation, saving time and expense.
Once documents are compiled and interested parties identified, the next step is drafting a clear petition that presents the facts, legal basis, and supporting evidence to the court. The petition lays out the settlor’s intent, the trust terms, and the specific property at issue, along with exhibits such as deeds and affidavits. Our office prepares the necessary filings, coordinates court fees, and ensures procedural completeness. Accurate filing and thoughtful presentation help the court efficiently review the matter and reduce the likelihood of procedural delay or challenge.
Supporting declarations from trustees, witnesses, or others familiar with the settlor’s intent are often submitted with the petition to corroborate documentary evidence. We draft clear declarations and assemble exhibits that tell a consistent story about the property and how it was intended to be treated. These materials must be organized so the court can readily follow the sequence of events and the basis for the requested order. Strongly presented exhibits and declarations can significantly influence the outcome by clarifying intent and dispelling ambiguity.
After preparing the petition and supporting materials, we file with the appropriate probate court and ensure that statutory notice requirements are met. Service of process on heirs, beneficiaries, lienholders, and other interested persons follows prescribed timelines and methods. Properly executed service protects the integrity of the proceeding and helps secure a binding court order. We manage the filing and service logistics so clients can focus on gathering any remaining evidence and responding to inquiries from interested parties in a timely fashion.
Following filing and notice, the court may schedule a hearing to review the petition and any objections. At the hearing, the court considers evidence and arguments before deciding whether to issue an order recognizing trust ownership. If granted, the order becomes part of the public record and can be presented to title companies or lenders. We assist in preparing for hearings, presenting a clear record, and taking steps to record the court order or corrective documents so that title is updated and future transactions can proceed without encumbrance.
At the scheduled hearing, the court evaluates testimony, declarations, and documentary exhibits. We present the factual narrative and legal basis for the petition, and address any objections raised by interested parties. Our goal is to secure an order that authoritatively confirms trust ownership. Handling objections requires familiarity with the relevant evidentiary standards and persuasive presentation of the settlor’s intent. A well-prepared hearing reduces the chance of delay and increases the prospects for a decisive ruling that clarifies title for trustees and beneficiaries.
Once the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, the final step is to record the order or execute and record any corrective deed necessary to reflect the change in public title records. Recording creates the official documentation that title companies and lenders rely upon for future transactions. We coordinate with clerks and title professionals to ensure the order is properly recorded and that subsequent conveyances or refinancing activities can proceed smoothly. Completing the recording step provides lasting clarity and protects the trust’s legal position.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to recognize property as belonging to a trust even if a deed was not properly recorded in the trust’s name. The petition relies on evidence that the settlor intended the property to be in the trust, such as the trust instrument, attempted transfer documents, records showing payment of expenses from trust funds, and communications indicating intent. The petition is used when title records do not accurately reflect the settlor’s estate plan, and a judicial determination is needed to align legal title with that intent. Filing a petition can prevent the property from being subject to probate and allows trustees to manage or dispose of the asset under the trust’s terms. The court reviews the totality of evidence and issues an order if it concludes that recognition of trust ownership is appropriate. This remedy is particularly useful when corrective deeds are unavailable or when competing claims require a formal judicial determination to protect the trust and its beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition focuses on proving the settlor’s intent that property be treated as trust property despite a failure to record a deed, using equitable principles to align title with the trust. Probate, by contrast, is the statutory process for administering assets that remain in an individual’s name at death, and it can be more time-consuming and public. A quiet title action resolves disputes over competing claims to property but may not address the specific trust-based intent that a Heggstad petition targets. Choosing among these options depends on the available evidence, the presence of objections, and the broader estate planning objectives. A Heggstad petition is often preferred when the trust instrument and supporting records strongly indicate intended trust ownership and a judicial declaration can prevent probate and clarify title for future transactions.
Helpful documents for a Heggstad petition include the trust instrument, any signed or draft deeds, tax and insurance records showing how the property was treated, mortgage payment records, and correspondence indicating the settlor’s intent. Declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s statements or conduct are also valuable. These materials collectively create a narrative that supports recognition of trust ownership by the court. Additional evidence such as recorded notices, trust amendments, or financial records demonstrating management of the property from trust accounts strengthens the petition. The more consistent and contemporaneous the documentation, the more persuasive the petition will be, reducing the likelihood of extended litigation and facilitating a clearer judicial outcome.
Timelines for resolving a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the facts, the court’s schedule, and whether interested parties contest the petition. In straightforward, uncontested matters with clear documentation and cooperative parties, the process can be completed in a few months. When disputes arise or evidence requires thorough development, the matter may take longer and involve hearings, additional discovery, or motions, extending the timeframe. Court backlogs and required notice periods also affect timing, so it is important to begin gathering evidence and notifying interested parties early. Working closely with counsel and preparing a well-documented petition can help expedite review and minimize procedural delays, but exact timelines depend on the specific circumstances in each case.
A successful Heggstad petition can keep property out of probate by obtaining a court order that recognizes the property as trust-owned at the time of death or transfer, which allows administration under the trust’s terms rather than through probate. However, the outcome depends on the strength of the evidence and the legal arguments presented. If the court finds the documentation and supporting testimony persuasive, it will issue an order that enables nonprobate treatment of the asset. If evidence is insufficient or if parties successfully challenge the petition, the property might still be subject to probate or other legal remedies. Proper documentation and a clear factual presentation improve the likelihood that the court will honor the settlor’s intent and avoid probate for the property in question.
Beneficiaries and heirs do not always need to consent for a Heggstad petition to proceed, but proper notice to interested parties is required by law. Consent from those with a potential interest can simplify and expedite the process, and uncontested petitions typically move more quickly. When parties agree, the court may issue an order without significant hearing time, reducing expense and uncertainty for the trust and beneficiaries. In contested situations, the court will evaluate objections and the evidence supporting the petition. Even when consent is not present, a petition can succeed if the court is convinced that the settlor intended the property to be trust-owned. Sound preparation, thorough notice, and clear evidence are essential whether parties consent or dispute the petition.
Common reasons a Heggstad petition might be contested include disagreements among heirs about ownership, competing claims from creditors or third parties, and insufficient documentary evidence demonstrating the settlor’s intent. Family dynamics and differing interpretations of the trust or related documents can lead to objections. Title defects or outstanding liens can complicate proceedings and prompt challenges to the requested judicial relief. When contests arise, the court will weigh the evidence presented by all parties. Addressing potential objections early through investigation, outreach to interested persons, and careful preparation of declarations and exhibits can reduce the likelihood of contested hearings and improve the chances of a decisive ruling in favor of recognizing trust ownership.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can facilitate refinancing or sale of trust property by producing a court order or corrected record that clarifies ownership. Lenders and title companies generally require clear title evidence before approving refinancing or purchasing transactions. A judicial determination that property belongs to the trust gives parties confidence to proceed with financing or transfer, and recording the order or corrective deed updates public records to reflect trust ownership. Coordination with lenders and title professionals during the petition process helps ensure that the documentation the court issues meets the requirements for closing transactions. Planning with legal counsel and those institutions in advance reduces surprises and enables smoother post-petition activity involving the property.
Title companies typically require documentation confirming ownership before issuing a standard title policy; a court order recognizing trust ownership or a recorded corrective deed will generally satisfy their underwriting requirements. Title insurers look for clear public records or authoritative court determinations to protect against future claims. Presenting the recorded order and supporting documents allows title companies to underwrite a policy showing the trust as the owner and to facilitate sale or financing. Occasionally, title insurers may request additional affidavits or endorsements depending on the property history. Working with counsel to provide complete documentation and to address any lingering title issues helps ensure that insurers are comfortable issuing policies after a petition resolves ownership concerns.
After a successful Heggstad petition, the court issues an order recognizing the property as trust-owned, which should then be recorded in the county where the property is located. Recording the order or executing a corrective deed brings public title records into alignment with the court’s determination and the trust instrument. This recorded documentation enables trustees to manage, sell, or refinance the property in accordance with the trust’s terms. The trustee should also notify beneficiaries, update trust inventories, and coordinate with title companies, lenders, or other parties involved in any planned transactions. Maintaining organized records of the petition, court order, and recorded documents protects the trust’s position and simplifies future administration or transfer of the property.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas