A Heggstad petition is a legal filing used to transfer property into a trust when the property title was not changed before the trustor passed away or became incapacitated. Residents of Berry Creek who rely on estate planning tools such as revocable living trusts often encounter this situation when a deed, vehicle title, or other asset remains titled in the decedent’s name. The Heggstad process asks the court to recognize that the asset belongs to the trust based on the decedent’s intent and trust documents. This guide explains the petition, common reasons it is needed, and how the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients throughout Butte County and nearby communities.
Filing a Heggstad petition can help avoid prolonged probate, clarify property ownership, and allow successor trustees to manage or distribute assets consistent with the trust. While the petition itself is often narrow in scope, it requires clear evidence of trust terms, the decedent’s intent, and a careful review of deeds and title documents. The process typically involves preparing legal declarations, filing court paperwork, and providing notice to heirs or interested parties. Early action can save time and reduce administrative complexity for family members handling a loved one’s estate in Berry Creek and surrounding California counties.
A Heggstad petition serves an important role when assets that should belong to a trust remain in the decedent’s individual name. Successfully obtaining a Heggstad order can streamline property transfer, reduce the need for full probate proceedings, and enable the trustee to follow the trust’s distribution plan without delay. Benefits include resolving title discrepancies, facilitating sale or refinancing of property, and preventing disputes among beneficiaries about ownership. Sound documentation and clear demonstration of the settlor’s intent are essential, and a measured legal approach helps preserve value and minimize the chance of challenges from other interested parties.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services tailored to clients across California, including individuals and families in Berry Creek. Our practice focuses on clear communication, practical solutions, and helping trustees and family members navigate post-death matters such as Heggstad petitions. We review trust documents, examine title records, and prepare the necessary court filings to establish trust ownership. Clients benefit from a steady, organized approach that prioritizes timely resolution, careful file preparation, and notification to interested parties to reduce surprises and delays in settling the trust’s affairs.
A Heggstad petition is typically used when a decedent intended certain assets to be held by a trust but those assets were not retitled prior to death or incapacity. The petition asks the court to recognize that title should be treated as belonging to the trust based on trust documents, beneficiary designations, or other evidence of intent. Commonly affected items include real property, vehicles, bank accounts, and certificates of title. The court evaluates declarations, the trust instrument, and supporting evidence to determine whether to enter an order transferring title to the trustee, enabling trust administration to proceed without full probate for that asset.
When pursuing a Heggstad petition, it is important to gather all relevant documents that show the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. This may include the trust agreement, deeds, prior wills that reference trust funding, beneficiary forms, transfer-on-death documents, and correspondence indicating the settlor’s planning steps. Evidence should clearly link the asset to the trust or show a consistent intent to transfer. The court weighs the written record and affidavits from the trustee or other witnesses. The goal is to achieve a judicial finding that the asset should be administered as part of the trust estate, avoiding unnecessary probate expense and delay.
A Heggstad petition is a specific court petition seeking an order that a particular asset should be recognized as trust property despite being titled in the name of the decedent. The petition typically asserts that the asset was intended to be placed in the trust and provides the legal and factual basis for that assertion. Courts examine trust documents and any available indicia of the settlor’s intent. If granted, the order directs the county recorder or relevant agency to acknowledge the trustee’s authority or permit transfer into the trust, which allows trustees to manage, sell, or distribute assets according to the trust terms.
Preparing a Heggstad petition involves assembling trust documents, title records, declarations from the trustee or witnesses, and any other evidence of intent to fund the trust. The process typically includes verifying chain of title, drafting the petition and supporting declarations, filing the petition with the appropriate probate court, and providing required notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and lienholders. Depending on the asset type and local rules, additional documents such as a proposed order, deed, or requested modifications to public records may be submitted. Attention to procedure and thorough documentation supports a smoother judicial review and favorable outcome.
Understanding key terms helps trustees and family members navigate the petition process. Terms to know include trustee, settlor, trust instrument, title, probate, and deed. Familiarity with these words clarifies the legal steps required to transfer assets into a trust after incapacity or death. This section defines commonly used terms and explains their relevance in petitions and trust administration. Knowing what documents to collect and what each term means reduces confusion during proceedings and supports timely, informed decisions when handling trust-owned property that lacks proper public transfer records.
A trustee is the person or entity designated in a trust document to manage trust assets and carry out the settlor’s instructions. The trustee has a duty to administer the trust prudently, follow the terms of the trust instrument, and act in the best interests of beneficiaries. When a Heggstad petition is needed, the trustee often files the petition to have a court recognize that a specific asset should be treated as trust property. The trustee’s declarations and documentation form an integral part of the factual record submitted to the court in support of the petition.
Title refers to legal ownership of property as recorded by public records, such as county deeds, vehicle registrations, or certificates of title. When title remains in a decedent’s name despite intent to fund a trust, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to treat the asset as trust property. Establishing that title should be transferred or recognized as belonging to the trust requires an examination of recorded instruments, trust language, and additional evidence of intent. Correcting title through a Heggstad order can permit the trustee to manage or convey the property consistent with the trust.
The settlor, sometimes called the grantor, is the person who creates the trust and transfers assets into it or intends to do so. The settlor’s intentions, as expressed in the trust instrument and supporting documents, are central to a Heggstad petition. Courts look to the settlor’s written declarations, contemporaneous transactions, and any actions showing intent to fund the trust. Demonstrating what the settlor meant or intended often determines whether the court will order title recognition or transfer to the trustee, enabling proper trust administration.
A deed is a recorded document that conveys ownership of real property from one party to another. When a deed fails to reflect transfer into a trust, a Heggstad petition may be used to establish that the property should be treated as trust property. The petition process may involve preparing a corrected deed or court order to instruct county recording officials. Evidence that supports a court-ordered adjustment includes the trust instrument, declarations, and any drafts or prior statements indicating the settlor intended the property to be included in the trust.
When assets remain outside a trust, trustees and family members can consider several pathways to resolve ownership, including initiating a Heggstad petition, opening formal probate for that property, or using noncourt administrative remedies where available. A Heggstad petition tends to be narrower and focuses on individual assets, which can be faster and less intrusive than full probate. However, courts will require persuasive evidence of intent. Evaluating options involves weighing time, cost, potential challenges from heirs, and the specific asset’s status. Careful assessment helps determine which route aligns with the estate plan and the practical needs of beneficiaries.
A limited approach such as a Heggstad petition is often appropriate when only one or a few assets were not properly retitled into the trust and all other estate affairs are in order. In these situations, the trustee may seek judicial recognition of trust ownership to permit sale, refinance, or distribution without opening a full probate estate. This path can save time and resources while addressing the specific title problem. Documentation that ties the asset to the trust and a straightforward notice to interested parties supports a focused petition and can avoid broader estate administration proceedings.
A limited court filing is more likely to succeed when trust documents clearly show the decedent’s intent and beneficiaries do not contest trust terms. When beneficiaries understand the trust plan and there are no competing claims, a Heggstad petition offers a narrow remedy that aligns public records with the settlor’s intentions. Providing complete copies of the trust and declarations from the trustee or witnesses describing the settlor’s funding efforts helps the court resolve the issue efficiently, reducing confrontation and simplifying the process of returning assets to trust administration.
Comprehensive legal attention may be necessary when multiple assets require correction, conflicting title claims exist, or the trust and estate present complex issues such as competing beneficiary interests. In those circumstances, a single Heggstad petition for one asset might not be sufficient to address broader estate administration needs. A broader legal approach can coordinate multiple filings, resolve creditor claims, and ensure proper notice and compliance across jurisdictions. Taking a comprehensive view helps prevent piecemeal litigation and supports a more orderly settlement of the trust estate.
When heirs or creditors dispute ownership or the settlor’s intention is ambiguous, more extensive legal representation is often warranted. Resolving contested matters may require additional litigation, forensic review of documents, and careful strategy to protect the trustee’s ability to administer the trust. Counsel can assist with mediation, formal probate petitions, and defensive pleadings if parties challenge the trust or the requested order. Addressing disputes comprehensively reduces the risk of future litigation and helps preserve the estate’s value for beneficiaries.
A comprehensive approach to resolving trust transfer problems brings advantages when an estate involves multiple assets, complex creditor or tax considerations, or potential conflicts among beneficiaries. Coordinated planning and consistent filings across affected assets reduce administrative duplication and the possibility of inconsistent outcomes. By evaluating the entire estate picture, trustees can prioritize actions that preserve value and minimize delay. Such an approach also provides a clear paper trail and helps ensure compliance with court procedures and notice requirements across different jurisdictions or agencies involved in title corrections.
Another benefit of a broader approach is that it positions trustees to handle contingencies revealed during review, such as missing records, liens, or multiple possible heirs. Addressing these issues in a unified plan helps avoid repeated court filings and can reduce legal fees over time. Trustees also gain the advantage of consistent representation when negotiating with title companies, financial institutions, and county recorders to complete necessary transfers. The result is a more predictable timeline for settlement and distribution under the terms of the trust.
Pursuing a comprehensive approach enhances confidence that title issues have been fully resolved so trustees can manage and distribute assets without recurring legal questions. Consolidating review and filings ensures that corrections are implemented consistent with the trust and across different asset types. This reduces the chance of future disputes or challenges that might arise from incomplete transfers. Trustees benefit from having an orderly record of actions taken, which eases interactions with financial institutions, buyers, and government agencies during sales, transfers, or other trust administration activities.
A thorough, coordinated legal process reduces the likelihood of repeated court involvement and potential litigation after initial resolutions. Addressing related matters comprehensively helps identify and mitigate issues such as undisclosed creditors, ambiguous beneficiary claims, or conflicting documentation. This proactive management saves time and can lessen overall costs associated with piecemeal filings. It also supports a smoother timeline for trust distribution and reduces administrative burdens on trustees who must oversee settlement and asset transfer activities.
Start by assembling the trust instrument, recorded deeds, vehicle titles, bank records, and any correspondence that shows the settlor’s intention to fund the trust. Having a clear record of the trust terms and related documents helps support the petition and reduces the need for additional follow-up. Early collection of these items also identifies potential gaps or liens that must be addressed. Being organized from the outset allows for a more focused petition and smoother process when filing in the probate court for a Heggstad order in Berry Creek and Butte County.
Courts reviewing a Heggstad petition focus on whether the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust. Prepare declarations that describe the settlor’s planning steps, communications, and any contemporaneous actions showing intent to fund the trust. Witness statements, draft deeds, or related estate planning documents can strengthen the record. A clear narrative supported by documentary evidence helps the court reach a reasoned decision and can prevent unnecessary extensions or requests for additional proof during the judicial review process.
If property needed for trust administration remains titled in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition can be an efficient remedy to establish trust ownership, avoid full probate, and permit timely management or distribution of assets. Trustees and family members may prefer this process because it narrows the court’s focus to the contested item and relies on the trust document and supporting records. Addressing title discrepancies promptly can reduce complications when selling or refinancing property, paying creditors, and carrying out the settlor’s distribution plan as set out in the trust.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad petition is to provide legal clarity for third parties, such as title companies and financial institutions, that may require a court order before recognizing the trustee’s authority. A court order confirming trust ownership creates a public, enforceable record that eases transfers and dealings with governmental agencies. This formal recognition protects trustees from personal liability and supports orderly estate administration, making it easier to complete transactions that depend on accurate title records.
Typical scenarios include when a homeowner signed a trust but never recorded a deed in the trustee’s name, a vehicle or boat remained titled in the decedent’s name, or a bank account was intended for the trust but lacks proper beneficiary or pay-on-death designation. Other circumstances involve transfers that were started but not completed prior to incapacity or death. These situations create a mismatch between the settlor’s intent and public records, and a Heggstad petition helps reconcile that difference by asking the court for recognition of trust ownership over specific assets.
One frequent circumstance is real property that should have been conveyed to a trust but remains recorded in the decedent’s name. This can occur when the deed was not prepared or recorded before the settlor’s death, leaving title inconsistent with the trust. Filing a Heggstad petition asks the court to acknowledge that the property should be treated as part of the trust, permitting the trustee to manage, rent, refinance, or sell the property under the trust’s terms. Proper documentation of intent and the trust instrument supports the requested order.
Vehicles, boats, and other titled items are often overlooked during trust funding and may remain titled in the decedent’s name. A Heggstad petition can request judicial recognition that the trustee controls those assets for trust administration. This recognition may be necessary for registration transfers, insurance updates, or sale. Providing title documents, registration records, and evidence of the settlor’s intent helps the court determine whether the asset should be included in the trust estate and allow the trustee to proceed with appropriate transactions.
Bank and brokerage accounts sometimes lack payable-on-death or transfer-on-death designations, or they may have been left in the decedent’s name despite trust planning. When payment instructions or beneficiary forms do not match trust intentions, the trustee may need a court order to access funds for trust administration. A Heggstad petition can be used to clarify ownership of such accounts when other documentary evidence supports inclusion in the trust. Clear accounting and documentation help ensure funds are distributed according to the settlor’s plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists families and trustees across Berry Creek and Butte County with filings like Heggstad petitions, trust administration, and related estate planning tasks. We provide practical guidance on document collection, court filing, and notice requirements so trustees can move efficiently to resolve title issues. Our office can liaise with county recorders, title companies, and financial institutions to implement the court’s order once obtained. Call 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation and learn how to begin the Heggstad petition process in this region.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for careful, client-focused representation in trust-related matters. We emphasize practical solutions, timely communication, and detailed preparation of petitions and supporting declarations. That approach helps reduce delays and avoids unnecessary court appearances when possible. Our goal is to help trustees and families resolve title issues so they can move forward with trust administration, sales, or distributions without prolonged uncertainty or avoidable procedural setbacks.
When preparing a Heggstad petition, comprehensive documentation and clear explanation of the settlor’s intent are essential. We assist clients by reviewing trust instruments, locating deeds and title records, drafting declarations, and meeting procedural requirements for filing and service. We explain options and likely timelines so trustees understand the path forward, and we coordinate with third parties such as title companies and county recorders to implement the court’s order after it is issued. Effective coordination reduces friction during the transfer process.
We also help trustees plan next steps after a successful Heggstad order, including preparing deeds or other documents to update public records, assisting with property sales or transfers, and advising on trust administration tasks. Clear guidance through each stage helps ensure that assets are handled in accordance with the trust and applicable law, giving beneficiaries and trustees greater certainty and allowing estate matters to be concluded with minimal disruption.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to collect trust documents, title records, and any related estate planning paperwork. We review the materials to assess the strength of available evidence showing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Once documentation is in order, we draft the petition, supporting declarations, and proposed court orders, then file with the probate court and arrange proper notice to interested parties. After the court issues an order, we assist with any recording or agency procedures needed to update public records and enable the trustee to manage the asset under the trust’s terms.
The initial step focuses on identifying the documents and records that demonstrate the settlor’s intent to place the asset in the trust. This includes the trust instrument, deeds, registration records, and any drafts or communications indicating funding intent. We evaluate chain of title, outstanding liens, and notice requirements to assess whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate mechanism. A thorough assessment at this stage helps anticipate potential objections and determines what additional evidence may be needed before filing in probate court.
We assist in locating and organizing trust instruments, deeds, certificates of title, bank statements, and any correspondence or drafts that show the settlor’s intention to include the asset in the trust. This step often requires contacting county recorders, financial institutions, and family members to assemble a complete record. A well-compiled folder of documents supports a clear narrative for the petition and reduces the likelihood the court will request further evidence or clarification during the review.
We identify all parties who must receive notice of the petition, including beneficiaries, heirs, and any holders of liens or encumbrances. Proper service is required for the court to proceed and for any order to be durable against future claims. Determining the correct parties and ensuring accurate service addresses reduces procedural risk. We also evaluate whether alternative dispute resolution or negotiation might be appropriate when parties have concerns that could impact the petition’s progression.
After compiling documentation and identifying interested parties, we draft the Heggstad petition, supporting declarations, a proposed order, and any ancillary pleadings required by the local probate court. Careful drafting makes clear the factual basis for recognizing the asset as trust property and addresses foreseeable objections. Once the paperwork is finalized, we file with the proper court and follow local rules for submission, scheduling hearings if necessary, and ensuring all filing requirements are satisfied in a timely manner.
Supporting declarations explain the settlor’s actions and the trustee’s knowledge of the trust’s terms. Declarations may come from trustees, family members, or other witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent and actions. Documentary evidence such as drafts, recorded deeds, or beneficiary forms is attached to corroborate the narrative. Putting forward a clear, well-documented factual record increases the likelihood that the court will issue an order recognizing the asset as belonging to the trust.
Filing the petition requires compliance with local probate rules, payment of any necessary fees, and arranging for formal service on all required parties. We manage deadlines and proof of service filings so the court record remains complete. In some cases, the court may set a hearing or order additional briefing; we prepare responses and attend hearings as needed. Following procedural rules strictly reduces the chance of technical defects and supports the court’s consideration of the petition on its merits.
If the court grants the Heggstad petition, we obtain the signed order and coordinate next steps to update public records or complete transactions. This may include preparing and recording deeds, working with title companies to clear encumbrances, or submitting the court order to agencies that control certificates of title. We guide trustees through necessary administrative actions so the asset is effectively treated as trust property and the trustee can proceed with management, refinancing, sale, or distribution under the trust’s terms.
Following the court’s order, certain documents may need to be recorded with the county recorder or submitted to vehicle registration agencies and financial institutions. We prepare the necessary instruments and liaison with these entities to ensure that title and account records are updated promptly. Proper recording and institutional notification reduce the risk of future disputes and allow trustees to act on behalf of the trust without facing administrative obstacles or delays in transactions involving the asset.
After title is corrected and records are updated, we assist trustees with completing trust administration tasks such as distributions, sales, or transfers in accordance with the trust instrument. We provide guidance on accounting, tax considerations, and ongoing obligations to beneficiaries. Ensuring that each administrative step follows from a clear record of the court’s order reduces the likelihood of future challenges and supports a timely, transparent distribution process that honors the settlor’s intentions.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to recognize a particular asset as belonging to a trust even though the public record still shows title in the decedent’s name. It is used when a settlor intended to fund a trust but an asset was never retitled before death or incapacity. The petition presents trust documents, declarations, and other evidence to show the settlor’s intent and requests an order that the trustee may manage or transfer the asset as part of the trust. This process is often applied to real property, vehicles, and accounts that require a court order for third parties to accept the trustee’s authority. The court evaluates the evidence and issues an order if it is convinced the asset should be considered trust property. That order then allows trustees to proceed with sales, transfers, or distributions in alignment with the trust’s terms, while providing legal clarity to title companies and institutions.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on local court calendars, the complexity of title issues, and whether any parties contest the petition. In straightforward matters with clear documentation and no objections, the process can often be resolved more quickly, though local filing and hearing schedules influence exact timing. Preparing comprehensive supporting records and ensuring proper service of notice helps reduce delays and keeps the matter moving through the probate clerk’s office and court docket. When additional evidence is needed, or when interested parties raise objections, the process can take longer as the court may require further briefing, evidentiary declarations, or a formal hearing. Working proactively to gather records and communicate with potential interested parties helps minimize delays and allows trustees to reach resolution as efficiently as possible given the specific circumstances in Butte County and surrounding jurisdictions.
Supporting documents commonly include the complete trust instrument, recorded deeds or title documents, declarations from the trustee or other witnesses describing the settlor’s intent, and any drafts or correspondence that indicate funding steps were taken. Additional useful items are prior wills referencing trust funding, beneficiary designations, bank or brokerage records, and copies of any attempted transfers. These documents form the factual basis that the court reviews when determining whether the asset should be recognized as trust property. It is important to present a clear chain of title and any evidence of lien holders or encumbrances that may affect the asset. When necessary, we help clients obtain certified copies of recorded documents, gather institutional records, and prepare detailed declarations to explain the circumstances. The more complete and organized the record, the stronger the petition typically appears to the court.
A Heggstad petition can eliminate the need for a full probate proceeding for the specific asset in question by obtaining a court order that recognizes the asset as trust property. This narrower remedy focuses on correcting title or clarifying ownership for particular items rather than opening a full estate administration. As a result, trustees can often administer those assets according to the trust without engaging in a broader probate case for that property. However, not all estate matters are resolved through a Heggstad petition. If there are other assets that require probate, significant creditor claims, or contested beneficiary issues, portions of the estate may still require broader court involvement. Evaluating the estate holistically helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is sufficient or if additional probate filings are necessary.
Required notice typically includes beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs who would inherit under intestacy rules if no valid trust exists, and any known creditors or lienholders. Proper service and proof of notice are procedural prerequisites to proceeding in probate court, and they give interested parties an opportunity to respond or raise objections. Identifying and notifying the correct parties reduces procedural risk and helps the court move forward with the petition. In some cases, notice must also be provided to government agencies or institutions that hold records or claims against the asset. We assist clients in determining who must be served, ensuring accurate addresses and legal names, and filing proofs of service to establish the court record. Thorough and timely notice practices support a durable court order and reduce the prospect of later challenges based on procedural defects.
Creditors and heirs can challenge a Heggstad petition if they believe the asset should not be treated as trust property or if they assert competing claims. Challenges may focus on the adequacy of evidence showing the settlor’s intent, possible issues with notice, or competing legal theories such as a claim that the asset is part of the probate estate. Such disputes can lead the court to require additional documentation or to set a hearing to decide contested issues. To minimize the risk of successful challenges, it is important to prepare a thorough evidentiary record and ensure proper service and notice procedures. When objections arise, counsel can respond through declarations, exhibits, and legal argument to support the trustee’s position. Addressing potential objections proactively helps facilitate an outcome that aligns with the settlor’s plan while protecting trustees from later liabilities.
Once the court grants a Heggstad petition, the signed order becomes part of the public record and provides authority for the trustee to treat the asset as trust property. The trustee may then record deeds or submit the court order to appropriate agencies to change title or register the trust’s interest. Title companies and financial institutions generally rely on the court’s order when updating records, enabling transactions such as sales, transfers, or refinancing to proceed. After records are updated, trustees should follow the trust instrument’s instructions for management and distribution, keep beneficiaries informed, and complete any required accounting. We help clients implement the court’s directives, record necessary documents, and coordinate with institutions to finalize transfers so the trustee can carry out trust administration with clarity and confidence.
A Heggstad petition is well suited for many asset types that rely on public records for title recognition, including real property and certain titled personal property. It is also used when institutional acceptance of trustee authority hinges on a court order. However, not all assets require a Heggstad petition; some accounts or property can be transferred through beneficiary designations, transfer-on-death procedures, or direct contractual arrangements that do not involve probate court. Evaluating asset types and available alternatives helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is the best route. In some cases, other administrative steps can resolve the issue more quickly. We review each asset’s documentation to recommend the most efficient, legally sound path to achieve the settlor’s intent and support trustee administration.
The cost to file a Heggstad petition depends on factors like the complexity of the title issues, the number of assets involved, whether additional evidence must be gathered, and local court filing fees. Straightforward petitions with clear documentation and no objections typically require less time and lower fees, while contested matters or cases needing extensive investigation will cost more due to additional work and potential court hearings. We provide an initial assessment to estimate likely steps and associated costs based on the specific circumstances. Beyond legal fees, clients should expect court filing fees, costs for obtaining certified copies of records, and possible title company or recording expenses when updating records. We discuss fee structures, anticipated expenses, and cost-saving strategies during the initial consultation so trustees can make informed decisions about how to proceed.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients at every stage of a Heggstad petition, from initial document gathering and case assessment to drafting and filing the petition, serving notice, and implementing the court’s order. We help compile trust and title documents, prepare supporting declarations, and communicate with title companies and registries to complete necessary transfers. Our approach emphasizes clear communication and practical solutions aimed at resolving title issues and enabling trustees to administer assets consistent with the trust. We also represent clients in any contested proceedings, respond to objections with focused evidence and legal argument, and coordinate next steps after an order is issued, including recording deeds and updating accounts. Trustees and families benefit from a structured process that clarifies ownership and supports orderly trust administration in Berry Creek, Butte County, and across California.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas