A Heggstad petition can be necessary when a trust beneficiary needs the court to recognize that assets belong to a trust even though title was never formally transferred. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist clients in Butte County and the surrounding areas with clear, practical guidance about the process. From preparing the petition to presenting supporting evidence, our goal is to resolve transfer issues efficiently while protecting your rights and the integrity of the original estate plan. We handle matters related to revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related trust documentation with care and attention to detail.
Navigating a Heggstad petition involves gathering documentation, establishing the trust’s intent, and showing that the decedent intended the asset to be held in trust. Many clients come to us uncertain about the next steps after discovering assets were not retitled. We explain what evidence courts consider, such as the trust instrument, beneficiary designations, deeds, transfer documents, and contemporaneous statements. Our approach is practical and client-centered, focused on obtaining the judicial declaration needed to place property under trust ownership and prevent future disputes among heirs or creditors in Butte County and beyond.
Filing a Heggstad petition can restore the intended distribution of assets when paperwork or title transfers were not completed. The benefit of pursuing this legal remedy is achieving a court declaration that property was intended to be held in trust, which preserves the settlor’s wishes and reduces the risk of probate. This process can also protect beneficiaries from unexpected challenges, help clarify ownership for third parties, and streamline the administration of the estate. Acting promptly and with well-organized documentation increases the chance of a favorable outcome and minimizes extended delay and expense for the parties involved.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services to clients across California, including Biggs and San Jose. We focus on personalized representation for matters such as Heggstad petitions, trust modifications, and trust administration tasks. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, practical strategies, and thorough preparation of documents and evidence. We work closely with clients to review trust instruments, deeds, beneficiary designations, and any transfer-related records to present a persuasive case to the court. Accessibility and responsiveness are central to our client service philosophy, including straightforward fee discussions and timely case updates.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that certain property was owned by a decedent’s trust even though title was never formally transferred. This remedy is often pursued when assets intended for a trust remain in the decedent’s name, creating uncertainty about ownership and complicating administration of the trust. The petition typically requires presenting the trust document, evidence of intent to transfer, and supporting records showing the settlor treated the property as trust property. Understanding the standards of proof and preparing a clear factual narrative are essential to achieving a judicial declaration that aligns with the settlor’s testamentary plan.
The process for a Heggstad petition involves drafting pleadings, gathering documentary evidence, filing with the appropriate court in Butte County, and serving interested parties. Parties opposing the petition may raise defenses, such as alleging the settlor changed their intent or pointing to competing claims. Resolving those disputes often involves discovery, affidavits, and sometimes a hearing. The goal is to provide the court with a complete record that demonstrates the asset was intended to be part of the trust, whether through trust terms, transfer documents, or conduct demonstrating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a legal action asking a probate court to determine that property belongs to a revocable living trust despite title remaining in the decedent’s name. The petition relies on legal principles that recognize the settlor’s intent and equitable ownership when formal transfer steps were omitted. Typical situations include real property where deeds were not recorded, financial accounts not retitled, or assets transferred informally. The petition outlines facts showing the trust existed and that the asset was intended to be part of it, supporting a judicial declaration to correct the record and allow trust administration to proceed consistent with the trust’s terms.
Successful presentation of a Heggstad petition requires assembling several types of evidence and following procedural steps. Relevant elements include the trust instrument, any deeds or transfer documents, beneficiary designations, financial account records, and witness statements about the settlor’s intent. The process includes filing the petition in the probate court, providing notice to beneficiaries and potential claimants, and responding to challenges. Court orders that recognize trust ownership allow the trustee to take control of the asset and manage distribution. A thorough, organized record and careful legal argumentation increase the likelihood of a favorable declaration.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the Heggstad petition process. Terms like revocable living trust, trustee, settlor, beneficiary, deed, and pour-over will appear frequently in filings and discussions. Knowing what each term signifies clarifies roles and rights during administration and litigation. For instance, a certification of trust summarizes trust terms without exposing private provisions, while a pour-over will funnels remaining assets into a trust at death. Familiarity with these terms allows clients to recognize which documents are relevant and what evidence may support a petition asserting that assets belong to a trust.
A revocable living trust is a legal arrangement where a person, known as the settlor, transfers assets into a trust during life and retains the ability to modify or revoke the trust. The trust names a trustee to manage assets for beneficiaries according to the trust’s terms. Upon the settlor’s death, the trust often directs the distribution of property without the delays of probate for assets properly held by the trust. When assets are not retitled into the trust, a Heggstad petition may be used to establish that the settlor intended those assets to be trust property.
A Heggstad petition is a court action filed in probate court to declare that property belonged to a revocable trust even though title was not formally changed before the settlor’s death. The petition seeks a judicial declaration so trustees can administer assets as part of the trust, avoiding obstacles caused by assets remaining in the decedent’s name. The petition typically includes the trust document, supporting evidence such as deeds and account records, and a factual narrative demonstrating the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust.
A certification of trust is a condensed statement of key trust information that trustees use to demonstrate their authority to third parties without revealing the full trust instrument. It usually includes the trust’s name, date, trustees, and trustee powers, and it may be used when presenting documents to banks, title companies, or other institutions. In Heggstad matters, a certification of trust can be helpful in showing the trust’s existence and trustee authority while limiting disclosure of private provisions.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs any property not already placed into a trust at death to be transferred into the settlor’s trust, effectively sweeping remaining assets into the trust for distribution under its terms. While it helps capture overlooked assets, property passing via a pour-over will typically still goes through probate before being transferred to the trust. When a settlor intended to fund the trust during life but assets were never retitled, a Heggstad petition can sometimes accomplish the equitable correction without full probate administration.
When assets intended for a trust remain untitled, several legal avenues may be considered, including Heggstad petitions, probate administration with a pour-over will, or negotiated transfers with interested parties. Each path has pros and cons involving time, cost, and likelihood of success. A Heggstad petition aims to judicially declare the asset as trust property, potentially avoiding full probate. Probate may be necessary for assets without supporting evidence of trust funding. Choosing the right option depends on the available documentation, the complexity of potential objections, and the client’s goals for preserving the settlor’s plan.
A limited approach may work when the trust document and supporting records clearly show the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. Examples include contemporaneous deeds, beneficiary designations naming the trust, account statements indicating transfer instructions, or written notes expressing intent. When documentation is straightforward and other interested parties do not dispute the claim, a targeted Heggstad petition or administrative transfer process can efficiently resolve title issues without protracted litigation. Careful preparation of the evidentiary record supports a streamlined resolution in such cases.
When beneficiaries and other interested parties agree about the asset’s intended trust status, a less adversarial approach can often resolve the matter more quickly. Agreement may permit filing a simple petition with stipulated facts or executing corrective documents to effectuate the transfer. This cooperative path reduces court time and expense and can restore the trust’s intended asset distribution with minimal dispute. Even when parties are cooperative, it remains important to formally document the resolution and obtain clear court approval or recorded instruments to prevent later challenges.
A comprehensive approach is often needed when title issues are complex, documentation is incomplete, or there are competing claims from heirs, creditors, or other parties. In such circumstances, additional steps like formal discovery, depositions, forensic review of records, and robust legal briefing can be necessary to build a persuasive case. A thorough approach helps ensure all potential defenses are addressed, that evidence is authenticated, and that procedural requirements are met. This level of preparation can be essential when the matter is contested and a clear judicial declaration is required.
Comprehensive representation also focuses on preventing future disputes and protecting the trust’s long-term administration. That may include resolving ambiguous beneficiary designations, clarifying trustee powers, obtaining court orders that address potential creditor claims, and recording corrected deeds or assignments. By creating a clear record and obtaining enforceable court rulings, the trustee and beneficiaries reduce the risk of later litigation that can drain trust resources. Attention to these details can preserve estate plan intent and reduce uncertainty for family members and other stakeholders.
A comprehensive approach provides stronger protection for the settlor’s intent and minimizes the chance of future challenges. By meticulously gathering records, preparing legal arguments, and securing court rulings, trustees can confidently administer the trust and distribute assets according to the trust terms. This process also helps ensure that third parties, such as banks or title companies, recognize the trustee’s authority. The result is smoother trust administration, reduced exposure to creditor or heir disputes, and greater certainty for beneficiaries regarding their inheritance rights.
Taking a thorough path also helps preserve family relationships by resolving potential conflicts through clear legal channels rather than informal or contested exchanges. With careful case preparation, trustees can avoid ambiguity that might lead to misunderstandings or lawsuits. Court involvement can provide finality, making it less likely that the property’s status will be challenged later. By addressing both current title defects and surrounding legal issues, a comprehensive approach promotes stability and clarity for the trust’s administration and distribution plan.
One major benefit of a comprehensive approach is obtaining a clear legal title and recognized trustee authority. When courts issue declarations that property belongs to the trust, trustee powers to manage and distribute those assets are affirmed. That clarity simplifies transactions like selling property, transferring accounts, or defending against creditor claims. It also reduces administrative friction with institutions that require formal proof of trustee authority. Strong documentation and court orders create a stable foundation for efficient trust administration and protect beneficiaries’ interests.
Another important benefit is lowering the chance of future litigation by creating a compelling record and securing judicial findings. Addressing title defects, clarifying beneficiary rights, and resolving disputes at the outset removes ambiguity that might otherwise lead to contested claims later. A definitive court ruling or properly recorded corrective documentation limits the availability of grounds for future challenges, protecting the trust assets and reducing legal costs over time. This proactive approach promotes stability in trust administration and helps preserve estate assets for intended beneficiaries.
Start by collecting all documents that could show the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Useful items include the trust instrument, deeds, beneficiary designations, account statements, transfer records, and any written notes or correspondence. Even informal records or contemporaneous emails can be persuasive when assembled into a coherent timeline. Having comprehensive documentation prepared before filing a petition helps streamline the process, reduces the chance of delays, and strengthens your ability to present a clear factual narrative to the court and interested parties.
Be prepared to file the necessary pleadings in probate court to obtain a judicial declaration and to record corrective deeds or assignments if ordered. A court order recognizing trust ownership should be recorded with the county recorder as appropriate to clear title for third parties. Recording these documents and updating account titles or beneficiary designations as authorized by the court helps ensure that the trustee’s authority is recognized by banks, title companies, and other institutions. Proper recording reduces the likelihood of future challenges.
You may need a Heggstad petition if property intended for a trust remains in the decedent’s name, creating barriers to administration or distribution. Common scenarios include real estate with unrecorded deeds, bank or brokerage accounts not retitled, or assets transferred informally with insufficient documentation. When the settlor’s intent can be demonstrated through the trust instrument and supporting records, a petition can secure a court declaration establishing the asset as trust property. Timely action can prevent unnecessary probate or disputes, allowing trustees to manage and distribute assets as the settlor intended.
Other reasons to pursue this service include resolving creditor concerns, clarifying trustee authority for financial institutions or title companies, and preventing disagreements among beneficiaries. If there is uncertainty about ownership that could lead to litigation, pursuing a Heggstad petition can provide legal clarity. The process also helps safeguard the trust’s assets by documenting intent and securing formal recognition from the court. Acting proactively reduces the risk of downstream complications that might otherwise prolong estate administration or diminish the estate’s value.
Frequent circumstances include situations where deeds were drafted but not recorded, accounts were intended to be retitled but were never changed, or assets were transferred informally but lack formal paperwork. Other triggers include discrepancies between the trust document and property records, missing transfer documents, or conflicts between beneficiaries over property status. These conditions create uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries, and a Heggstad petition can resolve disputes about ownership and facilitate proper trust administration according to the settlor’s documented plan.
Sometimes a settlor intended to transfer real property into a trust but the deed was never recorded or was prepared incorrectly. When the title remains in the decedent’s name, the trustee cannot freely manage or sell the property without a clear legal declaration. Filing a Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize the property as trust property based on the trust terms and supporting evidence. A court declaration can then be recorded to correct the public record and allow the trustee to proceed with administration or sale in accordance with the trust.
Bank, brokerage, or retirement accounts sometimes remain titled in the decedent’s name because the retitling process was overlooked. Without proper retitling, institutions may be unwilling to release funds to a trustee. Evidence such as account forms, transfer instructions, or beneficiary designations showing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust can support a Heggstad petition. A successful petition clarifies the account’s status, enabling the trustee to access assets for trust administration and distribution without protracted institutional barriers.
Occasionally, estate planning documents conflict or leave ambiguity about whether certain property should be held by a trust. Competing instruments, unclear beneficiary designations, or missing signatures can create disputes among heirs. In these cases, a court determination through a Heggstad petition can reconcile inconsistencies by examining the totality of the evidence and confirming the settlor’s intention. Obtaining a judicial declaration provides a clear legal basis for trust administration and reduces the potential for ongoing disputes among beneficiaries or creditors.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides assistance to clients in Biggs and throughout Butte County seeking to resolve trust funding and title issues. We guide clients through evaluating relevant documents, preparing petitions, and interacting with courts and institutions. Our focus is on practical, clear solutions tailored to each family’s situation, whether the matter is straightforward or contested. We explain options, outline likely timelines, and help clients gather the necessary records to present a persuasive case, working to achieve the most efficient and reliable outcome possible under California law.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for our practical, client-focused approach to trust and estate matters. We emphasize clear communication, thoughtful preparation, and steady guidance through court processes. Whether you need help assembling documentation, drafting pleadings, or obtaining a court declaration recognizing trust ownership, we provide hands-on assistance and keep you informed at every stage. Our goal is to reduce uncertainty and help trustees and beneficiaries resolve transfer issues efficiently while protecting the settlor’s intentions and the trust’s integrity.
Our services include careful review of trust instruments, deeds, account records, and related documentation to determine the best path forward. We prepare clear petitions tailored to the facts, handle required notices and filings, and present a well-documented record to the court. When disputes arise, we pursue practical strategies designed to resolve conflicts while protecting the trust’s assets. Clients appreciate our attention to detail and our commitment to securing durable resolutions that support sound administration and distribution of trust property.
We serve clients across California, including Biggs and San Jose, and assist with a range of estate planning and trust administration tasks such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and trust modifications. Our approach balances effective advocacy with cost awareness, aiming to resolve matters efficiently. We also help trustees implement court orders, record deeds and assignments when authorized, and update account titles so the trust can function as intended and beneficiaries can receive their distributions without unnecessary delay.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust documents and property records to assess the strength of the claim that the asset was intended for the trust. We then gather and organize supporting evidence, draft the petition, and file it in the appropriate probate court in Butte County. We provide required notice to interested parties, respond to inquiries, and pursue resolution through agreed filings or hearings as necessary. Throughout, we keep clients informed of status updates and next steps, and we coordinate recording or other follow-up measures when court orders are obtained.
We begin by assessing the trust, reviewing deeds, account records, and any written or electronic communications that may show the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. This stage involves identifying potential witnesses, locating relevant transfer documents, and determining which records need authentication. The goal is to gather a complete factual record to support a petition. A thorough initial evaluation helps us advise on the likely path forward, whether a targeted petition, voluntary transfer, or a more involved court process is appropriate given the available evidence and interested parties.
We carefully review the trust document and title records to identify discrepancies and to determine whether the asset was intended to be part of the trust. This includes examining deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any paperwork referencing transfer instructions. Establishing a timeline of actions and communications can be important, as can verifying the current state of title or account ownership. This review provides the factual foundation for drafting a persuasive petition and anticipating potential objections from other parties.
We seek witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent or actions regarding the property, such as family members, advisors, or financial institution staff. We also identify documentary evidence like emails, drafts of deeds, or transfer instructions that corroborate the settlor’s plan. Properly collecting and preserving this evidence early helps avoid gaps during later proceedings. Preparing affidavits, sworn declarations, and authenticated records strengthens the petition and supports a coherent presentation to the court and to any interested parties.
Once the record is assembled, we draft and file the petition in probate court, ensuring compliance with procedural rules. We prepare the necessary notices and serve them on beneficiaries, potential creditors, and other interested parties. Proper service is essential to avoid delays or jurisdictional problems. We also prepare responsive materials in case objections arise, and we seek to resolve disputes through stipulations where possible. If a contested hearing becomes necessary, we present the factual and legal arguments to the court to support recognition of trust ownership.
We draft a petition that sets forth the factual background, attaches supporting documents, and explains the legal basis for recognizing the property as trust-owned. The petition is filed with the probate court in the appropriate county and includes requests for any orders necessary to transfer title or otherwise clarify ownership. Attention to procedural detail and careful drafting reduce the risk of objections based on form or notice and help ensure the matter proceeds efficiently toward resolution.
We arrange proper service of the petition and related documents on beneficiaries, heirs, and others with possible interests. Clear communication about the petition’s purpose and the evidence involved can sometimes produce agreements that simplify court proceedings. When disputes arise, we respond with supportive filings and seek a path forward through negotiation or, if necessary, court hearings. Ensuring all parties are properly notified and informed is key to preserving procedural rights and moving the matter toward a final determination.
After the petition is heard, the court may issue a declaration that the property is trust-owned, or it may require additional evidence or proceedings. If the court grants the petition, we assist with recording any court-ordered deeds or assignments and updating account titles as necessary. We also help trustees carry out administrative steps authorized by the court, such as selling property or distributing assets to beneficiaries in accordance with the trust. Proper implementation of court orders ensures that title and records reflect the court’s determination.
At hearing, the court reviews the petition, evidence, and any objections, and then determines whether to issue a declaration that the subject property belongs to the trust. We present a clear factual narrative and supporting documents to the court to justify the requested declaration. If successful, the court’s order provides enforceable authority for the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under trust terms. When additional information is needed, the court may continue proceedings or require further evidentiary submissions before ruling.
Following a favorable ruling, we assist with recording the court order, preparing corrective deeds or assignments, and updating account registrations as authorized. We work with county recorders and financial institutions to ensure the public records and account titles reflect the trust’s ownership. These administrative steps prevent future challenges by making the trust’s rights clear to third parties. Completing the follow-up actions promptly helps trustees access assets for administration and distribution while maintaining compliance with legal and institutional requirements.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to declare that property was owned by a decedent’s trust even though title was never formally transferred. This remedy is used when documentary evidence indicates the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust but formal retitling did not occur. The petition typically attaches the trust instrument, deeds or transfer records, and any supporting documents that demonstrate intent. The court examines the totality of the evidence to determine whether a judicial declaration of trust ownership is appropriate. Filing this petition is often preferable to a full probate when the evidence supports the trust claim, because it can resolve ownership questions and allow the trustee to administer the asset under the trust terms. However, if documentation is lacking or disputes arise, additional procedures such as discovery or hearings may be required. The petition’s success depends on the strength and coherence of the supporting record and the court’s assessment of the settlor’s intent.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the facts, the completeness of the supporting documentation, and whether the petition is contested. Simple, uncontested matters that are well-documented may move forward more quickly, with perhaps a few months required for filing, notice, and judicial review. Contested petitions can take longer because they may require discovery, sworn witness statements, and hearings, which extend the process significantly. Court schedules and local probate procedures also affect timing, as each county’s docket and procedural requirements differ. Early preparation of documents, timely service on interested parties, and effective communication can help avoid delays. Your attorney can provide a more specific estimate after evaluating the records and potential for opposition in your particular case.
Evidence that supports a Heggstad petition includes the trust instrument itself, deeds or draft deeds indicating transfer to the trust, financial account statements with transfer instructions, beneficiary designation forms that reference the trust, and written or electronic communications showing the settlor’s intent. Affidavits or declarations from witnesses who observed the settlor’s actions or heard statements about trust funding are also valuable. The more consistent and contemporaneous the evidence, the stronger the petition will appear to the court. Documentation should be organized to tell a clear narrative about the settlor’s intentions and actions. Records that corroborate each other—such as a trust document paired with a draft deed and bank transfer instructions—are particularly persuasive. Authenticating documents and preparing witness declarations can solidify the case and help the court confidently conclude that the asset belonged to the trust despite a lack of formal retitling.
A successful Heggstad petition can often avoid some aspects of probate by obtaining a court declaration that particular assets belong to a trust and therefore pass under the trust terms. However, outcomes depend on the circumstances. If the trust claim is supported and the court recognizes trust ownership, those assets may be administered without full probate proceedings. If records are insufficient or there are competing claims, probate might still be required for certain assets. Even when a petition avoids full probate, related legal steps may remain necessary, such as recording corrective deeds or resolving creditor claims. Filing a petition is a way to secure a clear legal basis for trust administration, but whether probate is avoided entirely depends on the asset type, available evidence, and any disputes that arise during the process.
When filing a Heggstad petition, proper notice must be given to all persons who may have an interest in the property, including beneficiaries named in the trust, potential heirs, and any parties with recorded claims or liens. Probate rules outline who must be served or notified, and complying with those requirements is essential to preserve the court’s jurisdiction and prevent procedural challenges. Accurate notice helps avoid delays and ensures interested parties have an opportunity to respond or object. In addition to statutory notice requirements, communicating with likely stakeholders early can sometimes lead to agreements that simplify the court process. Even when parties are notified, responding to inquiries and sharing documentation can reduce misunderstandings and sometimes lead to stipulated resolutions, which saves time and expense compared with contested hearings.
If an interested party objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and may require additional evidence, briefing, or a hearing to resolve disputed issues. Objections can raise issues such as alternative interpretations of documents, allegations that the settlor changed intent, or competing claims to title. Addressing objections may involve discovery, witness testimony, or additional documentary evidence to counter the challenges. Preparing a responsive evidentiary record is essential when objections are anticipated. The court’s role is to weigh the evidence and determine whether the trust claim is supported. If objections are resolved in favor of the petition, a court declaration can be issued. If objections succeed, the court may deny the petition or require other remedies. Resolving disputes through negotiation or stipulation when possible can reduce litigation risk and lead to a more efficient outcome for all parties.
When a court grants a Heggstad petition and issues an order declaring property to be trust-owned, that order can be recorded with the county recorder to clear the public record. Recording the court order and any corrective deeds or assignments authorized by the court helps ensure third parties recognize the trust’s ownership. This recording is often necessary to update title for real property or to present to financial institutions as evidence of trustee authority. Recording provides durable public notice of the court’s determination, which reduces the likelihood of future challenges from parties unaware of the proceedings. It also enables trustees to transact with greater certainty, whether selling property, transferring accounts, or distributing assets to beneficiaries in accordance with the trust instrument and the court’s directives.
Costs for pursuing a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the matter, the amount of documentation and discovery required, and whether the petition is contested. Simple, well-documented petitions that proceed without objection tend to be less expensive than contested matters that require extended discovery, witness preparation, and hearings. Court filing fees and potential costs for recording orders or corrective deeds can also affect the overall expense. Discussing fee structures and expected costs upfront helps clients plan and make informed decisions. When possible, focusing on gathering strong supporting documentation and seeking cooperative resolutions can reduce both time and expense. An initial consultation with counsel can provide a clearer estimate based on the specifics of the case and the likelihood of opposition.
Whether trustees can act before a petition is decided depends on the situation and the institution involved. Some banks or title companies may require a court order or verified documentation before permitting a trustee to access or transfer assets. Acting without clear authority can expose trustees to liability, so it is important to confirm institutional requirements and, when necessary, seek judicial authorization before taking significant actions regarding contested assets. In cases where immediate action is required to preserve property or prevent loss, temporary court relief may be available to authorize necessary measures. Trustees should document all actions and consult legal counsel before proceeding to ensure authority is properly supported and to reduce the risk of personal liability or later disputes with beneficiaries or creditors.
Before seeking legal help for a Heggstad petition, gather all relevant documents that might show the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Useful records include the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, correspondence, and any draft transfer documents. Creating a timeline of the settlor’s actions and communications can also aid counsel in assessing the strength of a potential petition. Organizing these materials in advance speeds the initial evaluation and helps counsel identify the most persuasive evidence. Additionally, prepare a list of interested parties, such as named beneficiaries, potential heirs, and institutions holding relevant accounts. Noting any known disputes or concerns will assist in planning the best path forward. Early consultation allows counsel to recommend evidence-gathering steps, discuss likely timelines and costs, and propose strategies to resolve title issues efficiently while protecting the trust’s intended distribution plan.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas