A Heggstad Petition can resolve situations where a decedent intended to transfer assets into a trust but the transfer was never completed. In Paradise, California residents may encounter this issue when a title, deed, or account remains in the deceased person’s name, creating uncertainty for trustees and heirs. The process involves petitioning the probate court to recognize that the asset should be treated as belonging to the trust, based on evidence of the decedent’s intent and surrounding circumstances. Understanding how a Heggstad Petition works helps families secure trust assets and prevent unnecessary probate or creditor disputes.
Filing a Heggstad Petition requires detailed factual support, including documentation, witness statements, and a clear explanation of why an asset should be treated as part of the trust. In many cases the matter revolves around real property, bank accounts, or retirement benefits that were overlooked during estate planning. For Paradise families navigating the aftermath of a loved one’s passing, a Heggstad Petition provides a focused legal path to correct title and align assets with the deceased person’s estate plan. The petition process is intended to honor the decedent’s wishes while ensuring legal clarity for trustees and beneficiaries.
A successful Heggstad Petition can remove barriers to trust administration by officially moving an asset into trust ownership without full probate proceedings. This leads to more efficient distribution of trust property, clearer title for real estate transactions, and reduced delays in managing financial affairs. By proving that the decedent intended an asset to be held in trust, families can avoid lengthy probate litigation that consumes time and resources. In addition, resolving title issues through a Heggstad Petition can prevent future disputes among beneficiaries and third parties, helping preserve family relationships and protect the integrity of the trust.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients with estate planning and trust administration matters across California, including Heggstad Petitions for Paradise residents. Our practice is grounded in decades of experience handling trust and probate-related filings, trust modifications, and related petitions. We focus on clear communication and thorough documentation to present the strongest factual record to the court. Clients receive practical guidance through each step of the petition process, from gathering evidence to preparing declarations and supporting exhibits, with attention to streamlining outcomes and protecting client interests in trust administration.
A Heggstad Petition is a targeted legal remedy under California law for assets that a decedent intended to place in a revocable living trust but which remain titled in the decedent’s name at the time of death. The petition asks the probate court to determine that the asset should be treated as trust property based on the decedent’s intent and supporting evidence. It is often used for real property, bank accounts, or other titled assets when there is documentation or testimony demonstrating an intent to transfer to the trust. The procedure helps trustees obtain clear title and proceed with trust administration without full probate.
Successful resolution of a Heggstad Petition depends on credible evidence showing the decedent intended the asset to be held by the trust. Evidence can include trust documents, deeds, beneficiary designations, correspondence, depositions, and testimony from individuals familiar with the decedent’s planning. The court evaluates the totality of evidence to decide whether to treat the asset as trust property. For families in Paradise, this process can be an effective way to align actual asset ownership with the decedent’s estate plan and prevent unnecessary administrative hurdles that interfere with timely distribution of trust assets.
A Heggstad Petition asks the court to declare that a particular asset is part of a trust despite being titled in the deceased person’s name. The petition explains the factual basis for that declaration, offering evidence of intent and any steps taken by the decedent to transfer ownership. The legal effect is to allow trustees to administer the asset under trust terms rather than through probate, which can simplify distribution, reduce costs, and clarify ownership for third parties. The petition can also be a preventative measure to avoid disputes among beneficiaries or claims from creditors by establishing the trust’s rights to the asset.
When evaluating a Heggstad Petition, the court looks for clear evidence of the decedent’s intent, any contemporaneous documents or communications, and the practical actions taken that suggest a transfer to the trust was intended. Deeds, account forms, trust schedules, and draft transfer instruments are commonly relied upon. Testimony explaining why a transfer was not completed, or why an asset remained titled in the decedent’s name, can be persuasive. The petition must present a coherent narrative connecting the decedent’s planning documents to the asset in question, enabling the court to make a finding consistent with California rules for constructive trusts and trust recognition.
Understanding the legal vocabulary used in a Heggstad Petition helps clients follow the process more confidently. Common terms include trust instrument, constructive trust, title, trustee, beneficiary, declaration, and probate court order. Each term relates to how ownership and administration of assets are determined when paperwork is incomplete or transfers are overlooked. Familiarity with these phrases and their implications reduces confusion during proceedings and enables clients to provide the right documents and information to support the petition. Clear definitions also assist trustees and beneficiaries in communicating effectively with counsel and the court.
A trust instrument is the written document that creates a trust and outlines its terms, including naming the grantor, trustee, beneficiaries, and instructions for managing and distributing trust assets. This document is central to any Heggstad Petition because it evidences the decedent’s intentions regarding asset ownership. When an asset is intended to be held under the trust but remains titled in the decedent’s name, the trust instrument and any related schedules or amendments can support a petition asking the court to recognize the asset as trust property. Clear, contemporaneous trust documentation strengthens the petition’s factual foundation.
A constructive trust is an equitable remedy a court may impose to prevent unjust enrichment when someone holds property that, in fairness, should belong to another. In the context of a Heggstad Petition, the concept helps the court treat an asset as if it had been transferred to the trust when evidence shows the decedent intended that result. The remedy is not based solely on formal title but on the fairness of recognizing the trust’s interest. Demonstrating circumstances that justify a constructive trust supports the argument that the asset should be administered under the trust terms rather than probate.
Title refers to the legal ownership of an asset, such as real estate or financial accounts. A common complication addressed by a Heggstad Petition occurs when title remains in the decedent’s name despite intentions to transfer the asset to a trust. Clearing title through the petition allows trustees to manage or transfer property without the delays and costs associated with probate. The petition presents evidence that the decedent intended title to reflect trust ownership and asks the probate court to enter an order aligning title with the trust document.
A trustee holds legal title to trust assets and has a fiduciary duty to manage them according to the trust terms, while beneficiaries hold equitable interests and are entitled to distributions specified by the trust. These roles are central to a Heggstad Petition because the trustee often files the petition to establish the trust’s right to an asset. The court’s determination affects both the trustee’s ability to administer assets and the beneficiaries’ rights to receive distributions. Clear evidence that the decedent intended to place property in trust helps the court protect the rightful roles of trustees and beneficiaries.
When assets intended for a trust remain in the decedent’s name, multiple legal paths may exist. A Heggstad Petition offers a targeted approach to recognize trust ownership without full probate, focusing on factual evidence of intent. Alternatively, initiating probate or pursuing a corrective deed or litigation may resolve title but often involves more time and expense. Choosing the right option depends on the asset type, available documentation, potential disputes among heirs, and the presence of creditor claims. Evaluating these factors helps families select a route that aligns with their goals for efficient trust administration and minimized disruption.
A limited Heggstad Petition can be effective when the decedent left clear written evidence indicating the asset was intended to belong to the trust, such as a signed trust instrument, transfer forms, or a deed prepared but not recorded. In such cases, the facts required to convince the court are relatively straightforward and may allow for a focused petition rather than extensive litigation. Presenting a concise set of documents and a coherent narrative demonstrating intent can streamline the court’s decision, enabling trustees to obtain title clarifications and proceed with trust administration.
When there is minimal opposition from potential heirs or creditors and the factual record is strong, a limited Heggstad Petition may resolve the issue with less expense and delay. If beneficiaries are in agreement or potential claimants have no substantial grounds to contest the trust designation, the court may find it appropriate to order the asset treated as trust property after reviewing the supporting evidence. This path can conserve family resources and reduce conflict, allowing the trustee to manage the asset according to the trust without protracted court proceedings.
A comprehensive legal approach becomes necessary when title issues are complicated or when facts surrounding the decedent’s intent are in dispute. Competing claims from heirs, ambiguous documents, or incomplete records may require more extensive investigation, formal discovery, and presentation of witness testimony. In such circumstances, preparing for a contested hearing or addressing related probate claims often calls for a coordinated strategy that includes drafting pleadings, managing evidence, and negotiating potential settlements to avoid protracted litigation and to protect the trust’s interests effectively.
When creditor claims or third-party interests complicate an asset’s status, a thorough legal response is important to evaluate and defend the trust’s claims. Creditors may assert rights against the decedent’s estate, or third parties may challenge a transfer, requiring careful analysis of priority, documentation, and statutory deadlines. Addressing these issues may involve coordinated filings in probate court, negotiation with claimants, and protective motions to preserve trust property. A comprehensive plan helps ensure that trust assets are secured while resolving competing claims in accordance with California law.
A comprehensive approach to a Heggstad Petition reduces the risk of future challenges by building a robust evidentiary record that supports the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. This can prevent re-litigation, provide clearer title for real property transfers, and protect trust assets from avoidable creditor exposure. It also gives trustees a more secure foundation for carrying out trust instructions, avoiding delays in distributions. Investing time upfront to prepare thorough declarations and documentary exhibits often results in smoother administration and greater certainty for beneficiaries.
By addressing potential complications early—such as gaps in documentation, unclear beneficiary designations, or conflicting statements—a comprehensive case plan anticipates objections and prepares responses that the court will find persuasive. This approach can expedite the process by limiting surprises at hearing and demonstrating to the court that the petition is well-founded. The outcome frequently leads to a binding court order that clarifies ownership and facilitates efficient trust administration, which ultimately benefits both trustees and beneficiaries by minimizing long-term legal exposure.
A comprehensive petition strategy prioritizes thorough documentation and careful legal analysis to ensure that trust assets are recognized and protected. Presenting a clear, organized evidentiary record helps the court make a definitive ruling that aligns asset title with the trust, preventing later disputes or claims that might undermine the trustee’s authority. This strengthened protection supports timely administration and distribution of trust property, reduces exposure to unexpected creditor claims, and gives beneficiaries greater confidence that the deceased person’s intent will be honored.
Handling Heggstad Petition matters comprehensively can reduce delays by anticipating evidentiary needs and preparing materials that streamline court review. When the petition is well-supported and potential objections are addressed in advance, the court process tends to move more efficiently. This lowers administrative burdens on trustees who otherwise might face repeated court appearances, document requests, or contested hearings. The result is a more predictable timeline for resolving title issues and advancing trust administration, allowing trustees to focus on managing assets rather than prolonged litigation.
Begin by compiling all documents related to the trust and the specific asset in question, including the trust instrument, deeds, beneficiary forms, account statements, and any drafts or correspondence referencing the intended transfer. Chronological organization of these materials helps clarify the decedent’s intent and provides the court with a coherent record. Witness statements or affidavits from individuals familiar with the decedent’s plans can be crucial. Having a complete and well-ordered file reduces the time needed to prepare the petition and increases the likelihood of an efficient resolution.
Before attempting to sell or transfer real property or other titled assets, resolve any uncertainty about trust ownership through the appropriate legal process. If title remains in the decedent’s name and the trustee needs to manage or sell the asset, obtaining a court order recognizing trust ownership prevents later disputes with purchasers or third parties. Taking proactive steps to confirm title ensures that transactions close cleanly and reduces the risk of rescission or legal complications. Proper resolution supports smooth financial management during trust administration.
Families should consider a Heggstad Petition when an asset intended for a trust remains titled in the decedent’s name, creating obstacles for trustees and beneficiaries. This petition offers a focused remedy to align asset ownership with the trust instrument, avoiding full probate in many situations. It can clarify title for real estate transactions, allow trustees to access financial accounts, and reduce delays in distribution. For Paradise residents, the petition may be the most efficient legal route to resolve overlooked transfers and ensure that the deceased person’s estate plan is carried out as intended.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad Petition is when there is a desire to minimize uncertainty and potential disputes among heirs or creditors. By presenting a strong factual record to the court, trustees can obtain an authoritative determination that supports trust administration and reduces the risk of future litigation. The petition can also help preserve estate value by reducing administrative costs associated with probate and by preventing prolonged delays that might harm beneficiaries’ interests. Ultimately, pursuing this path often results in a clearer and more efficient administration process.
Typical circumstances prompting a Heggstad Petition include a deed prepared but not recorded, bank or brokerage accounts left in the decedent’s name, retirement accounts with inconsistent beneficiary designations, or real property acquired after trust formation that was never retitled. Life changes, oversight during estate updates, or administrative delays can all contribute to assets remaining outside the trust. Recognizing these common scenarios early allows trustees to gather necessary documentation and prepare a petition that explains the decedent’s intent and remedies the title inconsistency effectively.
A deed that was prepared but never recorded is a frequent reason for filing a Heggstad Petition. When a decedent intended to move real property into a trust but failed to record the corrective deed before passing, the property remains in the decedent’s name, complicating administration. The petition presents evidence of the decedent’s plans, such as the trust instrument and the unrecorded deed drafts, to demonstrate that the property should be treated as trust property. The court can then issue an order clarifying title and permitting the trustee to act on behalf of the trust.
Financial accounts that were not transferred or retitled into the trust during the decedent’s life can require a Heggstad Petition to resolve ownership. Statements showing contributions, correspondence about intended transfers, or beneficiary designation forms inconsistent with the trust can all be relevant evidence. The petition asks the court to recognize the trust’s interest in the account so the trustee can access funds for trust administration or distribution. Addressing these accounts promptly helps avoid delays in paying expenses and carrying out the trust’s terms.
When the decedent acquired property after creating a trust and did not retitle that property into the trust, a Heggstad Petition can align the asset with the estate plan. Evidence such as purchase documents, communications indicating intent to include the asset in the trust, and consistent estate planning records help support the petition. The court’s determination allows trustees to treat the property as trust-owned, which simplifies later management or distribution. This remedy is particularly helpful where the failure to transfer was inadvertent rather than intentional.
The team serving Paradise offers focused assistance for trustees and family members facing incomplete trust funding or unclear asset title. We guide clients through evidence gathering, petition drafting, and court procedures to seek a ruling that aligns assets with the trust. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, thorough documentation, and preparing declarations that accurately reflect the decedent’s intent. For Paradise residents dealing with overlooked transfers, this service aims to secure trust asset recognition so that administration can proceed with minimal delay and uncertainty.
Selecting experienced counsel for Heggstad Petitions matters because the process requires careful assembly of evidence and persuasive presentation to the court. Our firm assists clients by identifying relevant documents, preparing declarations, and coordinating witness statements that support a clear narrative of intent. We prioritize practical solutions that aim to minimize court time and reduce administrative costs while protecting the trustee’s ability to manage trust assets. This focused assistance helps trustees move forward with administration and distribution in a way that honors the decedent’s estate plan.
We also guide clients through communication with beneficiaries and interested parties to reduce conflict and improve the likelihood of an uncontested resolution. By preparing a comprehensive and well-organized petition file, trustees can show the court a compelling factual record, which often leads to a favorable determination without prolonged litigation. Our goal is to resolve title issues efficiently so that trust administration proceeds without unnecessary interruptions, safeguarding family relationships and preserving estate value for intended beneficiaries.
Practical support extends to advising trustees on interim steps while a petition is pending, such as securing property, handling essential expenses, and taking actions that preserve estate value. Communication with financial institutions, title companies, and other third parties is handled carefully to avoid missteps that could complicate the petition. These measures provide trustees with a clear path to fulfill their obligations and ensure the trust’s assets are managed responsibly while the court considers the petition.
Our process begins with a focused review of trust documents, asset records, and any draft transfer instruments to identify the evidence needed for the petition. We then assist in obtaining supporting affidavits, drafting the petition and declarations, and preparing exhibits that the court can review easily. If necessary, we coordinate service to interested parties and respond to inquiries during the statutory notice period. Throughout the process we keep trustees informed of timelines, potential obstacles, and recommended next steps to move toward a court order recognizing trust ownership of the asset.
The first essential step is collecting all documents and testimony that demonstrate the decedent’s intent to have the asset belong to the trust. This includes the trust instrument, deeds, account records, correspondence, and statements from individuals who can speak to the decedent’s planning decisions. A thorough assessment identifies strengths and weaknesses in the factual record and helps determine whether a focused Heggstad Petition or a broader legal response is appropriate. Establishing a clear factual foundation makes subsequent pleadings more persuasive and efficient.
Identifying and securing the right documents and witnesses early avoids delays later in the process. We work with trustees to locate trust amendments, unrecorded deeds, bank statements, and communications that reflect the decedent’s intent. Witness statements from family members, advisors, or others familiar with the decedent’s planning are documented and prepared as declarations. A well-documented evidentiary package enables a coherent petition that lays out the factual basis for the court to recognize the asset as part of the trust.
After gathering evidence, we evaluate possible challenges including conflicting claims, creditor issues, or unclear documentation. This assessment shapes a strategy for the petition, whether that means pursuing an uncontested court order or preparing to address objections. Considering possible responses in advance helps ensure the petition is structured to withstand scrutiny and supports the trustee’s authority. Thoughtful planning reduces surprises and improves the likelihood of a timely and dependable court determination.
Once evidence is assembled and the strategy is set, we prepare the Heggstad Petition and supporting declarations, organizing exhibits for clear court review. The petition sets forth the factual narrative and legal basis for treating the asset as trust property, while declarations from witnesses provide corroboration. We ensure compliance with California statutory requirements for notice and filing, arrange service on interested parties, and submit the petition to the probate court. Careful drafting and presentation help reduce procedural challenges and facilitate judicial consideration.
Declarations translate witness knowledge into admissible court evidence, so clarity and specificity matter. We draft declarations that recount firsthand observations, contemporaneous communications, and factual context supporting the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Declarations are organized to complement documentary exhibits and to present a consistent factual timeline. Clear declarations reduce confusion at hearing and help the court understand how the evidence supports recognition of the trust’s rights to the asset.
Proper notice to beneficiaries and interested parties is a procedural requirement for Heggstad Petitions. We manage the service and notification process to ensure that statutory timelines and procedural rules are met, reducing the risk of delays or objections based on defective service. Timely, accurate notice also promotes transparency among beneficiaries and may encourage resolution without contested litigation. Managing these procedural aspects carefully supports an efficient path to a court decision.
After filing and service, the petition is scheduled for a court hearing where the judge reviews the evidence and hears any objections. We prepare trustees and witnesses for testimony if necessary and present the documentary record in a logical sequence to the court. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it will enter an order recognizing the asset as trust property, enabling trustees to manage or transfer it under the trust terms. If objections arise, we address them through briefing or negotiation to seek an acceptable resolution.
At the hearing, presenting a clear and well-supported factual narrative helps the court determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. We coordinate witness testimony and ensure exhibits are admitted and organized for easy reference. Explaining the chain of events, the decedent’s written instructions, and the reason the transfer was not completed assists the court’s fact-finding. A coherent presentation increases the likelihood of an order that aligns title with the trust and enables efficient trust administration.
If the court issues an order recognizing the asset as part of the trust, the trustee can take steps to change title or present the order to third parties such as title companies or financial institutions. We assist in implementing the court’s order, coordinating recording of corrected deeds or updating account ownership to reflect trust control. These post-order tasks complete the transition and allow the trustee to carry out the trust terms, ensuring that assets are managed and distributed according to the decedent’s plan.
A Heggstad Petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to recognize that an asset titled in a decedent’s name should be treated as part of a revocable living trust. It is typically used when a decedent intended for property to be held in trust but, for some reason, did not complete the formal transfer before death. The petition presents evidence of intent—such as trust documents, draft deeds, account records, and witness declarations—to establish that the asset should be administered under the trust rather than through probate. The petition focuses on factual proof rather than reworking the trust instrument itself. If the court is convinced that the decedent intended the transfer, it may issue an order recognizing the trust’s interest, which allows trustees to manage or transfer the asset under the trust terms. This remedy is particularly useful for clearing title and enabling efficient administration without full probate in many situations.
The timeline for a Heggstad Petition varies depending on the complexity of the facts, the court’s docket, and whether interested parties raise objections. In relatively straightforward cases with clear documentary evidence and no opposition, the process from filing to court hearing can take several weeks to a few months, depending on local probate court scheduling and notice periods. Gathering supporting documentation and preparing declarations efficiently shortens the preparation phase. If disputes arise or additional discovery is required, the timeline can extend significantly. Contested matters may involve additional filings, hearings, or settlement negotiations that add months to the process. Working proactively to assemble a thorough record and communicating with potential claimants often helps achieve a more timely resolution.
Supporting a Heggstad Petition requires documents and statements that together show the decedent intended the asset to be held in the trust. Key evidence often includes the trust instrument, any amendments, deeds or draft deeds indicating attempted transfer, account records reflecting an intent to use the asset with the trust, and correspondence referring to the transfer. The more contemporaneous the documentation, the stronger the factual case tends to be. Declarations from individuals who can attest to the decedent’s plan also play a critical role. Witness statements may explain why a transfer was not completed, the decedent’s consistent statements about funding the trust, or interactions with advisors. Organizing these materials into a coherent narrative for the court is central to presenting a persuasive petition.
Yes, beneficiaries, heirs, or creditors can contest a Heggstad Petition if they believe the asset should remain part of the probate estate or if they dispute the factual basis for the claimed trust transfer. Contests typically focus on questions of intent, conflicting documentation, or potential creditor rights. When opposition is likely, the petitioning party should prepare to address challenges with additional evidence, declarations, or negotiation to resolve disagreements. In many cases, early communication with interested parties can reduce the risk of contest and encourage resolution without extensive litigation. If objections proceed, the court will weigh the evidence presented by both sides, and the outcome will depend on the strength and credibility of the documentation and testimony supporting the petition.
A Heggstad Petition can avoid full probate for the specific asset at issue by persuading the court to treat that asset as trust property. When successful, the petition allows the trustee to administer the asset under the trust terms rather than through the probate process. However, the petition does not automatically eliminate probate for other assets that legitimately belong to the decedent’s probate estate; those matters must be addressed separately. The petition’s effect is limited to recognizing trust ownership for the asset identified in the petition. It is a focused remedy intended to reduce administration burdens related to title issues and to enable efficient handling of trust assets, but families should assess whether other estate matters still require probate steps.
If the court grants a Heggstad Petition regarding real property, the decision clarifies that the property is trust-owned despite the recorded deed being in the decedent’s name. The trustee can then use the court order to record a corrected deed or to present the order to title companies and escrow agents when selling or refinancing the property. This clarification removes uncertainty about ownership and streamlines transactions that would otherwise be complicated by title discrepancies. Practical issues such as recording fees or requirements of third-party institutions may remain, but the court order is a powerful tool for establishing the trust’s legal authority over the property. The order helps prevent challenges from buyers or lenders who might be wary of acquiring property with unresolved title questions.
Alternatives to a Heggstad Petition include initiating probate administration for the asset, pursuing a corrective deed if parties agree, or negotiating an out-of-court settlement among heirs and interested parties. Probate may resolve title issues but is typically more time-consuming and may incur higher costs. Where beneficiaries and trustees can reach agreement, corrective documentation may be recorded without court involvement, though such approaches require clear concurrence and careful attention to legal formalities. Choosing an alternative depends on the strength of evidence, the presence of disputes, and the asset type. Consulting about the potential costs and benefits of each option helps families decide whether a focused petition or another path best meets their goals for efficient administration and reduced conflict.
In California, a trustee or an interested party can file a Heggstad Petition to request that the court recognize an asset as trust property. Trustees commonly bring the petition on behalf of the trust to secure title and proceed with administration. Interested parties may include beneficiaries, co-trustees, or others who have a direct stake in the asset’s classification and distribution under the trust instrument. Filing by an authorized trustee typically provides the strongest basis for the petition since trustees have the legal responsibility to manage trust assets. However, any party with a legitimate interest and standing under California law may seek the court’s assistance to resolve title discrepancies affecting trust administration.
Yes, filing a Heggstad Petition involves court filing fees and potential costs for service, document preparation, and any necessary title reports or recording fees. Additional expenses may arise if opposing parties engage in litigation, requiring more extensive briefing or hearings. Costs vary by county and the complexity of the matter, so planning for potential expenses is important when considering whether to proceed with a petition. Even with costs, a successful petition can reduce overall expense compared to full probate in many cases, particularly when it avoids protracted administration or litigation. Careful preparation and efforts to resolve disputes early can help manage costs and make the petition process more economical for trustees and beneficiaries.
Before filing a Heggstad Petition, trustees should compile a comprehensive packet of documents that support the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust. This packet should include the trust instrument and any amendments, deeds or draft deeds, account statements, communications referring to the transfer, and records of any transfer attempts. Identifying and preparing witness declarations from those familiar with the decedent’s planning decisions is also essential to build a persuasive factual record. Trustees should also review potential interested parties and anticipate objections, addressing creditor claims or heirs who may have competing interests. Early coordination with beneficiaries, title companies, or financial institutions can prevent surprises. Preparing a clear timeline and narrative that ties the evidence together makes the petition more efficient and increases the likelihood of a favorable court determination.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas