When circumstances change, modifying an existing trust can preserve your intentions and protect beneficiaries. A trust modification petition is a legal step to adjust trust terms, correct errors, or respond to changed family, financial, or tax situations. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist clients in Paradise and throughout Butte County with clear guidance on when a court petition is necessary, what information the court will consider, and how to present a persuasive factual record. This introduction explains the basics of a trust modification petition and what clients should expect when seeking a court-ordered change to a trust document.
Navigating trust modification involves careful review of the trust instrument, applicable California law, and the relationships among beneficiaries and fiduciaries. Some modifications can be achieved through trustee action or agreement among interested parties, but others require court approval to ensure legal validity and protect interested parties. This paragraph outlines how the process begins, including documentation review, discussion of goals such as correcting drafting errors or addressing changed circumstances, and the initial steps our firm takes to assess whether filing a petition is the best path to secure a durable and enforceable modification for a client in Paradise or nearby areas.
A properly pursued trust modification petition can prevent future disputes, clarify distribution instructions, and ensure trust assets are managed according to the settlor’s present intentions. Filing a petition can resolve ambiguities, correct execution errors, or address changed circumstances such as remarriage, estrangement, or significant shifts in asset composition. For trustees and beneficiaries, the petition process also provides a formal record of court findings and orders, reducing the risk of later litigation. For settlors or their representatives, seeking a modification preserves the intent behind estate planning documents while complying with California probate rules and protecting the interests of all parties involved.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides client-focused estate planning and trust litigation services across California. Serving individuals and families from Paradise to San Jose and beyond, the firm helps clients evaluate trust documents, determine the proper legal route for modifications, and prepare petitions for court review when necessary. We emphasize clear communication, thorough documentation, and strategic planning to achieve durable outcomes. Our team works closely with each client to understand their goals, explain legal options under California law, and guide them through each procedural step with attention to detail and practical problem solving.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to alter or clarify the terms of an existing trust when modification cannot be accomplished informally. Reasons for filing include correcting mistakes in drafting, resolving ambiguities, adjusting to changed relationships or circumstances, or addressing incapacity or removal of a trustee. The petition must establish standing and provide factual and legal grounds for the requested change. In California, the court evaluates whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s intent, whether it is consistent with applicable law, and whether it protects the rights of beneficiaries and creditors.
Before filing a petition, it is important to gather the trust instrument, related estate planning documents, and records of any communications or transactions that bear on the requested change. Interested parties may include trustees, beneficiaries, the settlor (if able), and certain creditors. The process can involve discovery, notice to interested persons, and hearings. Understanding statutory deadlines, local probate rules in Butte County, and the types of relief available—such as modification, reformation, interpretation, or removal of a trustee—helps clients make informed decisions and prepares them for the procedural realities of the court process.
A trust modification petition asks the court to change the trust document in ways that reflect the settlor’s true intent or current circumstances. This might include correcting typographical or drafting errors, clarifying ambiguous provisions, adapting to changed family dynamics, or addressing tax and asset management considerations. The legal theory used can be reformation based on mistake or mutual intent, modification by consent of beneficiaries, or equitable relief when the trust’s purposes need adjustment. The petition explains the factual situation, cites legal authority, and proposes specific changes for the judge to consider and, if appropriate, order.
A successful petition requires clear identification of the trust, the parties with an interest, and the precise modifications requested. Supporting evidence typically includes the original trust document, contemporaneous correspondence, declarations from relevant witnesses, and documentation of any transactions or events that prompted the change. The petitioner must provide notice to all interested parties and follow local probate court procedures. The court may request additional evidence, hold hearings, or refer parties to mediation. Crafting a focused petition with complete exhibits and a persuasive factual narrative can streamline proceedings and increase the chance of obtaining the desired court order.
Understanding the terminology used in trust modification proceedings helps clients follow the process and make informed decisions. Terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, modification, notice of petition, intestacy consequences, and testamentary intent. Each term has specific legal meaning in California probate and trust law, and recognizing those nuances is important when evaluating options. This section provides concise definitions and practical context to help you identify relevant documents and parties, prepare necessary evidence, and understand the court’s likely considerations when evaluating a proposed modification to a trust instrument.
The settlor is the individual who originally creates the trust and transfers assets into it with the intent that the trust terms govern future management and distribution. The settlor’s expressed intent, often set out in the trust instrument, is central to evaluating requests for modification or reformation. When the settlor is alive and has capacity, some changes may be made directly; when not, or when the settlor lacks capacity, parties may seek court approval for modifications that reflect the settlor’s known wishes. Understanding the settlor’s role and recorded intent is essential to framing a persuasive petition under California law.
Reformation is a legal remedy that asks the court to modify the trust document to reflect what the settlor intended when the document was created, typically when a mistake or drafting error is alleged. Reformation requires admissible evidence showing the settlor’s actual intent and the nature of the mistake. The court evaluates declarations, contemporaneous writings, and other proof to determine whether the trust should be reformed. Reformation differs from simple interpretation because it results in a change to the written instrument to align legal language with the proven intent of the settlor.
A trustee is the person or entity charged with managing the trust assets in accordance with the trust terms and California law. Trustee duties include prudent asset management, impartiality among beneficiaries, accounting, and timely distribution as directed. When trust provisions are unclear or when a trustee’s action is contested, interested parties may seek court guidance or removal. In modification proceedings, the trustee’s role may include providing documentation, adhering to notice requirements, and sometimes negotiating modifications with beneficiaries to avoid contested litigation.
A beneficiary is any person or entity named in the trust who has an interest in its assets or distributions. Beneficiaries have rights to notice of proceedings, to receive accountings, and to object to proposed modifications that might prejudice their interests. When a petition to modify a trust is filed, beneficiaries are typically served and given an opportunity to participate in hearings, mediate outcomes, or contest the proposed change. The court gives careful consideration to beneficiary rights to ensure that any modification respects the settlor’s intent and does not unlawfully harm vested interests.
When considering adjustments to a trust, clients can pursue limited remedies such as bilateral agreements among parties or broader court petitions for reformation or modification. A limited approach may be faster and less expensive when all interested parties agree and the change is narrow in scope. A comprehensive approach, such as a formal petition for modification, provides a complete legal record and court endorsement but can involve more time and procedural steps. The choice depends on the level of agreement among beneficiaries, the complexity of the change, exposure to potential challenges, and the need for a definitive judicial ruling to prevent future disputes.
A limited approach is often suitable when all beneficiaries and the trustee agree on a narrow amendment and the change does not affect rights of absent or unknown parties. When mutual consent is complete and the parties can create a written amendment or enter into a settlement that complies with trust terms and California law, costly litigation may be avoided. Documenting the agreement, updating relevant trust schedules, and obtaining legal review preserves clarity and provides a record of the parties’ intentions while reducing procedural hurdles and court involvement.
Limited solutions work well for small technical corrections, such as fixing a typographical error, updating account numbers, or clarifying an ambiguous phrase that does not alter substantive beneficiary rights. Where the trustee and beneficiaries agree on the intended meaning and the change is well documented, a private amendment or acknowledgement can be sufficient. Legal counsel should still review the change to ensure enforceability and compliance with the trust instrument and California law, and to confirm that no other parties need to be notified to avoid future challenges.
A comprehensive legal approach, including a petition to the probate court, becomes necessary when beneficiaries or trustees disagree about the settlor’s intent or when a party objects to a proposed change. Court intervention provides an authoritative ruling that resolves disputes and prevents ongoing litigation. In such cases, the petition must present persuasive evidence such as declarations, trust copies, and relevant communications. The court’s ruling not only addresses the immediate conflict but establishes enforceable orders governing future administration and distribution, protecting the rights of all interested persons.
When a proposed modification affects multiple beneficiaries, trusts, or substantial asset transfers, a comprehensive petition is often the prudent path. Such changes can implicate tax consequences, creditor rights, or ancillary trusts like irrevocable life insurance trusts or retirement plan trusts. Court approval ensures the modification is legally effective and reduces the risk of future challenges. The petition process enables structured discovery, formal notice to all interested parties, and a hearing where factual and legal issues are resolved under California statutory and case law.
Seeking court approval for a trust modification provides certainty and legal finality. A judicial order clarifies rights, formally documents the change, and reduces the likelihood of future disputes. This approach is particularly valuable when the settlor is deceased, incapacitated, or when beneficiaries have competing claims. Court involvement also permits a structured resolution of contested facts through hearings and, if needed, discovery. For trustees, a court order can supply protection from later claims of improper administration by demonstrating that changes were made with judicial oversight.
A comprehensive process can also address associated legal and tax concerns that may arise from substantive modifications. When changes intersect with retirement plan trusts, life insurance trusts, or estate tax planning, formal court review helps ensure compliance with applicable regulations and that the modification aligns with broader estate planning goals. Additionally, the record created through court proceedings can assist successor trustees and beneficiaries by providing clear instructions and authoritative findings that guide administration and reduce the administrative burden on future fiduciaries.
One major benefit of a court-sanctioned modification is the legal finality it provides. With a court order, the modification becomes part of the official record and carries the weight of judicial approval, which diminishes the likelihood of future successful challenges. This formal resolution protects trustees who rely on court orders for their actions and provides beneficiaries with a definitive statement of their rights. The resulting clarity helps avoid protracted disputes and allows trust administration to proceed in a predictable manner with defined responsibilities.
A comprehensive petition enables the court to consider related legal issues in a single proceeding, such as trustee duties, potential conflicts, or the need to reform other documents to maintain consistent estate planning. Addressing interconnected concerns in one forum helps ensure coherent results and prevents inconsistent rulings from separate actions. The court can coordinate remedies that serve the trust’s overarching purpose and balance competing interests, resulting in a more durable and enforceable arrangement for the long term.
Begin by collecting the trust instrument, all amendments, related wills and pour-over documents, powers of attorney, and any correspondence or notes that reflect the settlor’s intent. Documentation also includes financial records, titles to major assets, beneficiary designation forms, and any trust certifications. Thorough records help establish the factual basis for a petition and can reveal whether a simple amendment or a court petition is appropriate. Organizing these materials early allows for a more efficient review and avoids delays once a petition or negotiation begins.
Mediation can be an effective alternative to prolonged litigation, particularly where relationships among trustees and beneficiaries remain workable. A mediated settlement can produce a mutually acceptable modification and preserve family relationships while saving time and legal expense. Even when mediation does not result in full agreement, the process can narrow issues for court consideration and create a roadmap for a more focused petition. Evaluating mediation early in the process can offer flexible solutions that a court order might not provide.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust’s terms no longer reflect the settlor’s intent, when errors in drafting create ambiguity, or when significant changes in circumstances affect how assets should be managed or distributed. Additional reasons include conflicts among beneficiaries, the need to remove or replace a trustee, or the discovery of assets not addressed by the existing instrument. Filing a petition helps create a formal resolution and can prevent future disputes by securing a court order that clarifies rights and duties under the trust.
You might also pursue a petition to resolve tax planning issues, reconcile conflicts between related documents like pour-over wills or retirement plan trusts, or to obtain judicial instructions when a trustee faces uncertainty about proper administration. In cases involving special needs trusts, irrevocable life insurance trusts, or pet trusts, court approval may be necessary to ensure the intended protections and distributions occur. Evaluating these considerations early can guide whether a limited amendment or full petition is the most prudent path forward.
Typical circumstances include the death or incapacity of the settlor, discovery of drafting errors, beneficiary disputes, or changes in family structure such as divorce or remarriage. Other triggers are the identification of previously unknown assets, changes in tax law affecting estate planning goals, or concerns about trustee misconduct. Each circumstance raises distinct legal and evidentiary issues. The petition process adapts to these situations by allowing the court to consider the trust’s purpose, the settlor’s demonstrated intent, and the equities among interested parties.
Drafting mistakes or ambiguous language in a trust document can lead to confusion about distribution plans or trustee responsibilities. When a clear error undermines the settlor’s intent, a petition for reformation or clarification helps align the written instrument with the proven intent. Supporting evidence often includes contemporaneous notes, declarations from those familiar with the settlor’s wishes, and related documents. Addressing these issues through the court prevents unintended distributions and administrative complications for trustees and beneficiaries.
Life changes such as remarriage, divorce, births, or significant shifts in asset composition can render existing trust provisions outdated. A petition may be necessary to update distributions, change fiduciary appointments, or adapt terms to new financial realities. Courts consider whether the requested changes properly reflect the settlor’s intent and whether the modification protects the interests of beneficiaries. Thoughtful documentation of the reasons for change strengthens the case for judicial approval and helps ensure a practical, enforceable outcome.
When trustees and beneficiaries disagree about administration, accounting, or distribution decisions, a petition can seek judicial guidance or orders resolving specific disputes. Issues may include allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, improper distributions, or failure to follow trust terms. The court can remove or replace a trustee, order accounting, or clarify the trustee’s obligations. Formal resolution through the probate court helps restore proper administration and provides remedies to protect the trust’s purpose and the beneficiaries’ rights.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Paradise and surrounding communities with responsive counsel on trust modification petitions. We help clients gather documents, evaluate legal options, prepare petitions, and represent them in court proceedings when necessary. With attention to local probate rules in Butte County and an understanding of California trust law, we aim to provide pragmatic guidance tailored to each client’s circumstances. Prospective clients are encouraged to call 408-528-2827 to discuss their situation and begin an initial case assessment and planning conversation.
Choosing the right legal representative for trust modification matters means finding a firm that communicates clearly, documents thoroughly, and navigates court procedures effectively. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we focus on understanding your goals, assembling the necessary evidence, and advising on the most practical path, whether that is negotiation or a court petition. We provide individualized attention to each case and prioritize efficient resolution while protecting the rights of trustees and beneficiaries under California law.
Our approach emphasizes early case assessment, careful document preparation, and proactive communication with all interested parties to reduce surprises and limit unnecessary conflict. When litigation becomes necessary, we prepare petitions with complete exhibits and clear factual narratives to assist the court in reaching a reasoned decision. For clients in Paradise and Butte County, this method helps keep proceedings focused and reduces time in court while pursuing a legally sound outcome.
We also consider the interconnected elements of estate planning, such as the role of pour-over wills, retirement plan trusts, irrevocable life insurance trusts, and special needs arrangements, ensuring that modifications align with broader estate goals. By coordinating across documents and potential tax considerations, we help clients achieve coherent plans that reflect present intentions and provide stable guidance for trustees and beneficiaries going forward.
Our process begins with an initial case review to identify the trust documents, parties, and the factual basis for a proposed modification. We then advise on whether a negotiated amendment or a court petition is the appropriate route. If a petition is needed, we prepare a detailed petition with supporting declarations and exhibits, ensure proper notice to interested parties, and handle filings with the Butte County probate court. Throughout, we keep clients informed of developments and explore alternatives such as mediation where appropriate to seek efficient, durable resolution of trust issues.
The first step involves a thorough review of the trust instrument, amendments, wills, and related documents to determine the scope of the issue and the best course of action. This includes identifying interested parties, potential creditors, and any procedural hurdles. We collect relevant evidence, evaluate the strength of legal theories such as reformation or modification, and advise on likely outcomes and timing. This assessment forms the basis for deciding whether to attempt informal resolution or prepare a formal petition for court approval.
We help clients gather the key documents necessary to support a modification petition, including the original trust, all amendments, related wills and powers of attorney, and any letters or notes that speak to the settlor’s intent. Additional evidence can include financial records, correspondence with trustees or beneficiaries, and witness statements. Comprehensive documentation strengthens the factual record and allows us to present a clear, organized petition to the court that addresses likely questions and objections from interested parties.
During the initial consultation, we discuss the client’s objectives, explain legal options and potential risks, and outline a recommended strategy. This conversation clarifies whether an informal amendment may suffice or whether a judicial petition is necessary. We set expectations about timeline, costs, and procedural steps, and identify possible avenues for settlement or mediation. Clear strategic planning at the outset helps position the case for a smoother process and more predictable results.
If a court petition is the chosen path, we draft a focused petition that sets out the facts, legal basis, and requested relief, and assemble supporting declarations and exhibits. We prepare required notices for interested parties and ensure compliance with local filing rules in Butte County. Proper preparation emphasizes clarity, thoroughness, and documentary support to reduce the need for protracted discovery and to facilitate efficient court consideration. Filing triggers official notice requirements and begins the court’s review of the proposed modification.
Drafting involves articulating the legal theory—such as reformation for mistake, modification by consent, or other equitable relief—and supporting it with declarations, documentary exhibits, and legal citations. Clear exhibits and witness declarations help the court understand the settlor’s intent and the factual basis for change. We focus on organization and completeness to anticipate likely disputes and to present a persuasive, well-documented petition that makes the court’s task of evaluating the request straightforward.
After filing, we arrange service of the petition and supporting papers on all required interested parties in accordance with California probate rules. Proper notice is essential to the court’s jurisdiction and gives beneficiaries an opportunity to respond. Depending on the circumstances, additional steps such as publication or service on unknown heirs may be necessary. Ensuring accurate and timely notice reduces procedural challenges and helps keep the case on schedule for hearings or settlement discussions.
Once the petition is filed and notices are served, the court may set a hearing, or parties may engage in settlement discussions or mediation. At the hearing, the court evaluates evidence, hears arguments, and may grant, deny, or modify the requested relief. If parties reach agreement, the court can enter an order reflecting that settlement. Our role during this phase is to advocate for the client’s position, respond to objections, and seek practical outcomes that align with the settlor’s intentions and the client’s objectives.
We prepare witness testimony, compile exhibits, and develop legal arguments to present at the hearing, focusing on the factual narrative and legal precedent that support the requested modification. Good preparation anticipates objections and provides the court with clear, organized evidence. During the hearing, we advocate for a resolution that reflects the settlor’s intent and protects beneficiary rights, while also seeking to minimize unnecessary conflict and delay for the parties involved.
After the court issues its decision, we assist clients with implementing the order, which may include updating trust records, transferring assets, or preparing new accountings. We ensure the trustee understands and complies with the court’s directives, and we help document changes to prevent future disputes. When the order affects related estate planning documents, we advise on necessary follow-up actions to maintain consistency across wills, powers of attorney, and ancillary trusts.
A trust modification petition may be justified by a number of situations, including drafting errors, ambiguity in language, changed family circumstances such as divorce or remarriage, discovery of previously unknown assets, or disputes about trustee actions and beneficiary rights. Courts also consider petitions that seek to realign trust terms with the settlor’s actual intent when there is convincing evidence. In each case, the petition should explain the factual basis for the requested change and why a court order is needed rather than a private amendment. Evidence supporting a petition often includes the trust instrument and any amendments, contemporaneous writings or communications that reflect the settlor’s intent, declarations from witnesses, and financial records. The court will examine whether the requested modification aligns with statutory requirements and whether it protects the rights of beneficiaries and creditors. Preparing a thorough factual record and following procedural rules is essential for the court to evaluate the request properly.
Timing for a trust modification petition varies depending on case complexity, the number of interested parties, and whether the petition is contested. In simpler cases with cooperative parties, the process might conclude in a few months, while contested matters involving discovery and multiple hearings can extend over many months. Local probate court calendars and scheduling procedures in Butte County also influence timing, and the need for additional evidentiary hearings or supplemental briefing can lengthen the timeline. Early and thorough preparation helps expedite the process. Providing complete documentation, promptly serving interested parties, and attempting settlement or mediation where appropriate can reduce delays. Because each case is unique, we discuss likely timelines during the initial consultation and provide ongoing updates to help clients plan for the duration of the matter.
Yes, beneficiaries and a trustee can sometimes modify a trust without court involvement when all interested parties agree and the trust instrument permits amendment by consent. In such situations a written amendment or a signed agreement can accomplish the change efficiently and privately. However, the parties must ensure that the amendment complies with the trust’s terms and California law, and that no absent or unknown beneficiaries would be adversely affected by the change. When not all interested parties agree, or when the settlor is unavailable or incapacitated, court involvement may be necessary to obtain enforceable relief. Even where agreement exists, legal review is advisable to confirm that the amendment is properly executed and will be upheld if challenged later, and to coordinate related documents like pour-over wills or retirement plan designations.
To support a reformation petition, evidence should demonstrate the settlor’s actual intent at the time the trust instrument was executed and show that a mistake or drafting error caused the written terms to deviate from that intent. Useful evidence includes contemporaneous correspondence, drafts of the trust document, declarations from individuals who were present at signing or worked with the settlor, and other writings that reflect the settlor’s objectives. The court weighs such evidence to determine whether reformation is warranted to reflect the true agreement. Legal authorities and precedent may also be cited to explain how courts have handled similar claims, and documentary proof of the mistake or ambiguity strengthens the petition. Because reformation changes the written instrument, a careful, well-documented factual record is necessary to persuade the court that the requested change accurately reflects the settlor’s intent and that equitable relief is appropriate.
Modifying a trust can have implications for related estate planning documents, such as pour-over wills, retirement plan trusts, irrevocable life insurance trusts, and powers of attorney. Changes to the trust’s distribution scheme may require corresponding updates to beneficiary designations or clarifying language in ancillary documents to maintain consistency across the estate plan. Failing to address related documents can create conflicts or unintended consequences in administration. When considering a modification, it is important to review the entire estate plan and adjust other instruments as needed. The petition and subsequent orders should be coordinated to reflect changes throughout the estate plan, and counsel can advise on whether additional filings or beneficiary designation updates are recommended to ensure the settlor’s comprehensive intent is honored.
Costs for pursuing a trust modification petition depend on whether the matter is contested, the extent of discovery required, court filing fees, and the time spent drafting pleadings and attending hearings. Uncontested petitions with clear documentation tend to be less costly, while disputes involving multiple parties, complex financial issues, or extensive evidentiary hearings will incur higher fees. Additional costs may include fees for obtaining records, expert reports when necessary, and court-ordered mediation. We discuss expected costs during the initial consultation and work to provide an estimate tailored to the case. Where possible, we attempt to narrow issues early and explore settlement or mediation to control expenses. Transparent communication about fees, billing practices, and cost-saving options is part of our service to clients considering a petition.
California probate courts require adequate notice to protect the rights of absent or unknown beneficiaries, which may include publication, service on known heirs, or other methods to ensure all interested parties have an opportunity to participate. The court evaluates whether notice was properly given before deciding on a petition, and failure to provide required notice can result in delays or the need to reopen proceedings. Providing accurate lists of interested parties and following local rules is essential to comply with procedural safeguards. Courts also consider the equities when unknown beneficiaries surface after a modification. Orders can be structured to provide remedies that protect newly identified parties, and in some cases the court may reserve jurisdiction to address subsequent claims. Ensuring that notice requirements are met and documenting compliance helps secure a durable outcome that limits the risk of future challenges.
Yes, a trustee can be removed or replaced as part of a modification or related probate proceeding when there are grounds such as breach of fiduciary duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or failure to perform trustee obligations. The petition should provide specific factual allegations and supporting evidence demonstrating why removal is appropriate and how replacement would better serve the trust’s purpose. The court balances the need for continuity in administration with protecting beneficiary interests when making such decisions. If removal is sought, the court may consider successor trustee appointments, interim measures to protect assets, and directing fiduciary duties pending resolution. Proper notice to all interested parties and thorough documentation of the trustee’s actions and any resulting harm strengthens the petition and assists the court in fashioning appropriate relief tailored to the trust’s needs.
Alternatives to filing a formal petition include negotiated amendments among trustees and beneficiaries, settlement agreements, or use of trust provisions that allow modification by consent. Mediation is another useful alternative that can help parties reach a voluntary resolution without bearing the full expense and time of court proceedings. These approaches can preserve relationships and offer flexible solutions tailored to family dynamics while achieving the desired adjustments to the trust’s terms. However, alternatives are only viable when parties are willing to cooperate and when modifications will not adversely affect absent or unknown beneficiaries. Legal counsel should review any agreed changes to ensure enforceability and to confirm that no party’s rights are unintentionally compromised. In some cases, court involvement remains the most secure path to permanent resolution.
To begin the process, contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for an initial case review and to discuss your goals and relevant documents. During the consultation we will ask you to provide the trust instrument, any amendments, related wills, powers of attorney, and documents that shed light on the settlor’s intent. This information allows us to assess whether a private amendment or a court petition is the most appropriate course. After the initial assessment we outline the recommended strategy, explain procedural steps and likely timelines, and provide an estimate of anticipated costs. If a petition is warranted, we assist with document gathering, drafting the petition and supporting declarations, and managing service and filings with the Butte County probate court. Ongoing communication keeps you informed throughout the process.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas