A Heggstad petition is a legal process used when a person who intended for property to be held in a trust did not complete the transfer before they died or before an irrevocable change. This situation commonly happens when real property remains in a deceased person’s name rather than in the trust designed to control distribution after their death. Our firm can explain how a Heggstad petition asks a court to recognize that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust and to treat title as if it had been transferred during the decedent’s lifetime. We provide clear guidance through the procedural steps and paperwork necessary to pursue this remedy in California courts.
Navigating a Heggstad petition requires careful factual development and adherence to local court rules. The process typically begins with gathering trust documents, deeds, bank records and witness statements that demonstrate the decedent’s intent. It also often involves preparing and filing a petition with the probate court, serving interested parties, and responding to any objections. While the matter is commonly resolved by consent or a short hearing, contested cases may require formal litigation. We help clients understand the likely timeline, costs, and evidentiary needs so they can make informed choices about pursuing a petition to clear title and honor the decedent’s estate plan.
A Heggstad petition can be essential to carry out the grantor’s estate planning goals when assets were not properly titled into a trust. Without court recognition, property may remain subject to intestacy rules or probate administration, causing delays and additional expense. A successful petition clears title in favor of the trust, enabling trustees to manage or distribute the asset according to the trust instrument. This remedy can prevent unnecessary adverse consequences for beneficiaries, reduce administration costs, and provide a clearer path for sale or refinancing of real property. The process also provides legal certainty by obtaining judicial confirmation of the trust’s intended ownership.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with estate planning and trust administration matters across California, including Calaveras County and Murphys. Our approach focuses on practical solutions to resolve title problems, reduce delay, and limit unnecessary court involvement. We prepare pleadings, gather supporting declarations, communicate with affected parties, and represent clients at hearings when needed. With experience handling revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related documents like powers of attorney and health care directives, we help families move forward after a loss by pursuing the legal remedies that honor the decedent’s intent and protect beneficiaries’ interests.
A Heggstad petition is appropriate when a deceased individual intended property to be held by a trust but the title was never changed to reflect the trust’s ownership. The petition asks the probate court to find that it was the decedent’s intention to transfer the property into the trust and that the failure to retitle was a result of mistake, oversight, or incomplete administration. Documentary evidence, testimony from witnesses, and the terms of the trust are commonly used to demonstrate intent. This legal pathway helps prevent assets from unexpectedly entering probate and allows trustees to administer assets as the decedent planned.
When considering a petition, the specific facts and the quality of evidence are important. Courts evaluate whether the trust instrument was in existence prior to the decedent’s death, whether there were communications or actions indicating intent, and whether any transfer documents were prepared but not recorded. The petitioner typically must serve notice to beneficiaries and interested parties, allowing them to object if they believe the property should not be treated as trust property. Understanding these elements ahead of time helps families and fiduciaries decide whether a petition is the right course to resolve title issues efficiently.
The core request of a Heggstad petition is judicial recognition that property that remains formally titled in a decedent’s name should be treated as trust property because of the decedent’s prior intent to place the asset into the trust. The petition asks the court to amend official records or otherwise declare that title passes to the trustee. Supporting evidence can include draft deeds, escrow instructions, trust documents, and witness statements. If the court grants the petition, trustees can administer the asset under the trust terms, which streamlines distribution and avoids probate for that item of property.
Preparing a successful petition typically involves collecting all relevant estate planning documents, locating any drafts or unrecorded deeds, obtaining statements from individuals who can attest to the decedent’s intent, and preparing declarations that address chain of title. The petitioner prepares the formal petition, files with the probate court, and serves required notices to heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties. The court may set a hearing if objections are raised, but many matters are resolved through stipulated orders after parties review the documentary record. Attention to procedural detail and evidence development improves the odds of a prompt resolution.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the process. Terms such as trust, trustee, grantor, petition, declaration, notice, probate court, title, beneficiary, and pour-over will are central to Heggstad petitions. Each plays a role in establishing whether property should be treated as trust property. For example, a pour-over will funnels remaining assets into a trust but does not itself transfer title before probate. A Heggstad petition addresses situations where retitling did not occur and asks the court to effectuate the grantor’s intent retroactively for estate administration purposes.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which a person known as the grantor places assets under the control of a trustee to hold and manage for the benefit of named beneficiaries. Trusts can be revocable or irrevocable and are frequently used to avoid probate, manage assets, and specify how property should be distributed. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the trust is the instrument claiming ownership of an asset that was not formally retitled before the grantor’s death. Demonstrating that a trust existed and reflected the grantor’s intent is central to a successful petition.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that requests judicial recognition that specific property should be treated as part of a trust because the deceased intended that result but failed to complete the necessary transfer. Named after a leading California case, the petition typically includes evidence such as trust documents, communications, and witness declarations showing the grantor’s intent to convey the property to the trust. When granted, a petition clarifies title and enables the trustee to administer estate assets according to the trust document.
A trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust property in accordance with the trust document’s terms and the law. Trustees have fiduciary duties to act in beneficiaries’ best interests and must follow the grantor’s instructions for administration and distribution. In Heggstad matters, the trustee often brings the petition to court seeking recognition that title should be held by the trust so the trustee can carry out management or distribution functions for the benefit of the named beneficiaries.
Notice and service refer to the procedural requirement to inform interested parties about the filing of a petition so they have the opportunity to respond or object. Adequate service commonly includes distributing copies of the petition to heirs, beneficiaries, and lienholders in accordance with court rules. Proper notice safeguards due process and is fundamental to obtaining a binding judicial determination. Failure to provide required notice can delay or threaten the validity of a petition and the court’s subsequent orders regarding title.
When property remains in a decedent’s name, families typically consider several legal pathways. Probate is the formal court process for distributing assets absent clear title in a trust, which can be time-consuming and public. A Heggstad petition aims to avoid probate for specific assets by proving they were intended to be trust property. A quiet title action resolves competing claims to ownership but is broader in scope and may be more adversarial. The appropriate choice depends on the asset, available evidence, the urgency of resolving title, and whether parties seek a cooperative or litigated solution.
A focused petition is often suitable when only a few items of property remain improperly titled and there is strong documentary or witness evidence showing the decedent intended to transfer those assets into the trust. Demonstrable items include draft deeds, escrow paperwork, trust funding checklists, or declarations from individuals who handled estate planning. In those situations, a single petition limited to the identified property can provide a quick, cost-effective pathway to clear title without resorting to full probate or a broader litigation strategy.
When beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties accept that the property should belong to the trust, a petition can be resolved through consent and a stipulated order. This cooperative approach minimizes court time, reduces conflict, and often allows a smoother transfer of title documents. Even when parties agree, the court will still require proof of intent and proper notice, but the absence of objections typically speeds the process and reduces legal expense compared with contested proceedings or full probate administration.
A comprehensive legal approach is advisable when title problems are complex, when there are multiple assets and numerous interested parties, or when creditors, liens, or competing claims complicate the situation. In those circumstances, addressing only a single asset may create unintended consequences for estate administration. A full review of the trust, related estate planning documents, and the chain of title for multiple properties helps ensure that remedies are synchronized, notices are properly served, and the overall administration complies with California law while minimizing exposure to future disputes.
When there is a realistic possibility of objections from heirs, competing beneficiaries, or creditors, a robust legal strategy is essential. Preparing for contested proceedings involves developing a thorough evidentiary record, anticipating defenses, and evaluating alternatives such as settlement or mediation. Counsel can help manage communication among parties, coordinate discovery if needed, and present declarations and documentary evidence to the court. This careful preparation improves the likelihood of a favorable outcome and reduces the risk of reversal or future challenge.
A comprehensive approach helps ensure that all relevant assets are considered and that the legal remedies pursued are consistent across the estate. It reduces the risk that an overlooked item will later trigger probate or litigation, which can be costly and disruptive. By coordinating filings, notices, and evidence gathering, trustees and families can reach durable resolutions that reflect the grantor’s wishes while protecting beneficiaries from surprise claims. This approach also aids in efficient administration, allowing trustees to manage or liquidate assets without recurring title questions.
Taking a broad view also creates opportunities to resolve multiple issues at once, such as combining petitions, clarifying powers of the trustee, and addressing ancillary documents like pour-over wills or certification of trust. Comprehensive preparation can shorten timelines by reducing the need for repeated court appearances or follow-up motions. It helps families avoid unnecessary stress by presenting a clear, organized record to the court, thereby increasing the odds of a prompt ruling that aligns with the decedent’s estate planning objectives.
A coordinated legal strategy improves the chances of obtaining clear title so trustees can manage, sell, or refinance property without delay. When the court recognizes that assets belong to the trust, trustees can act under the trust terms, reducing the administrative burdens associated with probate. Clear title also makes it easier to satisfy lenders or buyers and prevents surprises that could derail transactions. For beneficiaries, this clarity means smoother distribution of proceeds and fewer procedural obstacles during an already difficult time.
A thorough review and well-documented petition reduce the likelihood of future disputes over ownership or distribution. By anticipating objections, securing necessary declarations, and ensuring proper notice, the trust administration process becomes more resilient to later challenges. The court’s explicit order confirming trust ownership carries weight and deters opportunistic claims. Ultimately, investing time in preparing a comprehensive record can save significant time, money, and emotional strain for families down the road.
Collect trust documents, deeds, escrow records, and any drafts or correspondence related to the property as soon as possible. Written records such as unrecorded deeds, trust funding checklists, or escrow instructions can be persuasive evidence of intent. Witness statements from family members, attorneys, or financial professionals who were present during the trust funding process are also valuable. Having a thorough, organized set of materials before filing a petition minimizes delays, facilitates settlement discussions with interested parties, and presents the strongest possible case to the court while keeping administrative costs reasonable.
Evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is the best path or whether other remedies like quiet title, limited probate, or negotiated settlements may better serve the estate. Prepare for potential objections by anticipating common defenses such as lack of intent or competing claims, and assemble declarations and documentation to rebut them. If disputes appear likely, gather evidence early and consider alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation. Being prepared for objections reduces surprises, shortens courtroom time, and supports a smoother outcome for the estate and beneficiaries.
Consider a Heggstad petition when an asset that should have been placed into a trust remains titled in the deceased person’s name and transferring title through probate would be inefficient or contrary to the grantor’s plan. Common scenarios include real estate bought shortly before death, accounts that were never retitled, or deeds that were prepared but not recorded. A petition can be the most direct method to align title with the trust, allowing trustees to manage or distribute the asset without subjecting it to full probate administration and the delays that process can create.
Another reason to pursue a petition is when quick resolution is needed for a pending sale, refinancing, or to comply with a lender’s requirement. Banks and buyers typically require clear title before a transaction proceeds, and a court order recognizing trust ownership can satisfy those requirements. Families with limited resources or those who want to avoid a public probate administration may also prefer a petition for targeted relief. Legal counsel can assess the situation and recommend whether a Heggstad petition or an alternative path best preserves estate value and the decedent’s intentions.
Frequent circumstances include deeds prepared but not recorded, recently acquired property left in the decedent’s name, accounts that were overlooked during funding, and errors in title transfer. Other triggers are changes in marital status that were not reflected in title, failure to complete a beneficiary designation, or confusion over whether joint ownership actually replaced trust ownership. These situations are often discovered when trustees attempt to administer property, when heirs seek to sell assets, or during post-death financial reviews, prompting the need for a judicial declaration to align title with trust documents.
A deed may have been drafted to transfer real property into a trust but was never recorded prior to the grantor’s death, leaving legal title in the deceased’s name. This common oversight can create significant obstacles for trustees who need to manage or sell the property. A Heggstad petition seeks a court declaration that the grantor intended the property to be trust property, allowing recorders and third parties to accept the trust’s authority. Proper documentation, including the unrecorded deed and related communications, can support a petition and expedite resolution.
If property was purchased shortly before death and the buyer did not retitle the property into the trust, the asset can remain in the deceased’s individual name. In such cases, lenders, title companies, or buyers may insist on clear title before completing transactions. A Heggstad petition can address this gap by demonstrating the grantor’s intent to make the asset part of the trust, allowing the trustee to proceed with necessary transfers or sales. Clear evidence of intent and contemporaneous documents are particularly helpful in these scenarios.
Bank accounts, brokerage accounts, or retirement assets may have been intended to fund a trust but remain titled or beneficiary-designated in a way that bypasses the trust. When trustees discover these oversights, they may need court assistance to align the asset with the trust’s terms. A Heggstad petition may be paired with other administrative steps, such as updating beneficiary designations or working with financial institutions to transfer assets consistent with the trust, always respecting statutory requirements and institution policies to avoid disputes.
Our practice provides local representation to families and trustees in Murphys and surrounding areas of Calaveras County. We are familiar with regional courts and procedural nuances relevant to trust funding disputes and Heggstad petitions. From initial case assessment to preparing declarations and court filings, we assist clients through every stage of the process. We emphasize clear communication, timely updates, and practical solutions to resolve title issues while protecting beneficiary interests and honoring the decedent’s estate planning objectives.
Selecting counsel who understands trust administration, California probate rules, and local court practices can make the difference between a streamlined petition and prolonged litigation. We focus on developing a well-documented case that explains the grantor’s intent and meets procedural requirements. Our approach includes reviewing trust instruments, compiling supporting statements, and preparing clear, persuasive filings that judges and opposing parties can evaluate efficiently. Effective preparation often reduces delays and helps secure a favorable judicial determination more quickly.
We work closely with trustees and family members to gather necessary evidence, coordinate notice and service, and explore opportunities for resolution before contested hearings occur. Open communication and careful planning reduce misunderstandings and increase the likelihood of settlement. For clients who face objections, we are prepared to advocate at hearings, present declarations, and respond to evidentiary challenges. Our goal is to obtain durable orders that protect the trust’s integrity and facilitate prompt administration of estate assets in accordance with the grantor’s wishes.
Our office also assists with related estate planning matters that frequently arise during Heggstad proceedings, including preparing or updating pour-over wills, certification of trust documents, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives. Addressing these documents together helps ensure that any remaining planning gaps are closed and that trustees have the authority and documentation needed to carry out their duties. We aim to provide practical guidance that reduces future complications and supports a smooth administration for families during a difficult period.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust and relevant documents to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We will identify evidence to support the filing, advise on required notice, and estimate likely timelines and costs. After obtaining necessary materials, we prepare the petition, declarations, and supporting exhibits, file them with the probate court, and serve interested parties. We then monitor responses, attempt to resolve disputes through discussion or stipulation where possible, and represent clients at hearings if needed to secure a judicial order recognizing the trust’s ownership of the subject property.
The first step is a comprehensive case assessment and collection of all relevant documents. This includes the trust instrument, deeds, escrow and title papers, correspondence showing intent to transfer, and statements from witnesses. We evaluate the strength of the available evidence, identify potential opposing parties, and determine the appropriate form of petition and required notices. This stage sets the foundation for a persuasive filing and helps estimate whether the matter is likely to be resolved by consent or will require contested proceedings.
During the initial evaluation, we review the trust language, any unrecorded transfer documents, and the decedent’s contemporaneous actions. We identify the most persuasive evidence and tailor a strategy to demonstrate intent while minimizing disputes. This assessment also includes determining which interested parties must be notified and whether alternative remedies are advisable. By designing a clear plan early, we help clients understand the probable path forward and what resources will be needed to pursue a favorable outcome in a Heggstad petition.
Collecting and organizing documentary evidence is crucial. We work with clients to gather deeds, trust amendments, escrow instructions, and any communications that support the contention that an asset was intended for the trust. We also prepare witness declarations from family members, advisors, or witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s intent and the circumstances surrounding the attempted transfer. Well-crafted declarations and a complete evidentiary record enhance the likelihood of a prompt court ruling in favor of recognizing trust ownership.
After organizing the record, we draft the petition and supporting declarations and file them with the local probate court. We identify and serve all required parties, including heirs, beneficiaries, and potential lienholders, following court rules to ensure proper notice. At this stage we also provide copies of key documents and explain the process to recipients. Proper filing and service are essential to the court’s jurisdiction and the enforceability of any resulting order confirming trust ownership of the property.
The petition must clearly describe the property at issue, the trust provisions, and the factual basis for concluding the asset belongs to the trust. Exhibits typically include the trust document, deeds or drafts, and witness declarations. Clear, well-organized filings make it easier for the court to resolve the matter efficiently and reduce the risk of procedural objections. We ensure exhibits are properly authenticated and that the petition addresses foreseeable legal challenges.
Proper notice is a procedural requirement that cannot be overlooked. We carefully prepare service packages, complete proofs of service, and follow up to confirm receipt. If interested parties respond with questions or objections, we evaluate their concerns and attempt to negotiate resolutions where appropriate. Prompt, professional handling of responses often prevents disputes from becoming protracted and helps present a united, persuasive case to the court through stipulated orders if agreement is reached.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the petition, supporting declarations, and exhibits to the judge and, if necessary, respond to objections from other parties. Many petitions are resolved without a contested hearing when documentation is strong and parties agree. When a hearing is required, we prepare oral argument and focus on the factual record showing the decedent’s intent. A favorable ruling results in a court order that clarifies title and authorizes the trustee to treat the asset as trust property for administration and distribution purposes.
At the hearing, the court reviews the documentary record and hears testimony or declarations supporting the petition. We emphasize consistent, contemporaneous evidence that reflects the grantor’s intent to fund the trust and explain any gaps such as unrecorded deeds. If objections arise, we address them with factual and legal responses, seeking to resolve disputes short of extended litigation. Persuasive presentation of documentary evidence and credible witness statements often leads to judicial recognition of the trust’s claim to the property.
Once the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, the trustee can use the order to record new deeds, update title documents, and satisfy third-party requirements for sales or refinancing. We assist clients in implementing the court’s order, preparing the necessary documents for recordation, and communicating with title companies or lenders about the change in title status. Completing these steps finalizes the transition and allows the trustee to proceed with administration consistent with the trust terms.
A Heggstad petition is a court request asking a probate court to recognize that particular property should be treated as if it had been transferred into a trust before the grantor’s death. It is commonly used when paperwork was incomplete, such as an unrecorded deed or an account that was not retitled, but other evidence shows the grantor intended the property to be part of the trust. The petition seeks a judicial declaration that clarifies ownership so the trustee can manage or distribute the asset according to the trust document. People pursue a petition to avoid unnecessary probate for specific assets and to secure clear title for transactions like a sale or refinance. The court evaluates documentary evidence and declarations from those familiar with the grantor’s actions and intent. When supported by credible proof, a petition can provide a straightforward remedy that aligns title with the trust and facilitates prompt administration.
The time to resolve a Heggstad petition varies depending on the court’s calendar, the complexity of the factual record, and whether interested parties object. In uncontested cases with solid documentary support, the matter may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months once filings and notice are completed. When parties agree in advance and file a stipulation, resolution is often faster. Courts have different schedules, so local practice influences timing significantly. Contested matters take longer. If heirs or creditors object, expect additional time for briefing, discovery, and a hearing, which can extend resolution to several months or longer. Early evidence gathering and proactive communication with interested parties can shorten the process by reducing surprises and encouraging stipulation where possible.
Effective evidence commonly includes the trust document itself, any unrecorded or draft deeds, escrow instructions, correspondence indicating intent to fund the trust, and declaration testimony from persons who were aware of the grantor’s planning and actions. Bank statements, signed but unrecorded transfer documents, and contemporaneous notes or checklists prepared by the grantor or their advisor can be persuasive. The goal is to show a consistent pattern indicating the grantor intended the property to be trust property prior to death. Witness declarations explaining the circumstances and confirming the grantor’s intent are also important, particularly when documentary records are incomplete. Courts assess the totality of the evidence to determine whether the petition meets the legal standard. Preparing thorough, credible declarations and organizing documents clearly increases the petition’s chance of success and reduces the likelihood of protracted disputes.
Notice typically must be given to heirs, beneficiaries named in the trust or will, and any persons or entities with potential legal interests in the property, such as lienholders. The probate court requires proof of service in accordance with statutory deadlines and local rules to ensure due process for interested parties. Proper service preserves the court’s authority to decide the matter and prevents later challenges based on defective notice procedures. The specific list of required recipients depends on the circumstances and the identities of potential heirs or creditors. Counsel will identify the appropriate parties for notice, prepare service documents, and file proofs of service with the court. Clear communication with interested parties before filing can sometimes avoid contested proceedings and lead to a stipulated order after notice is provided.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can be opposed or contested by heirs, beneficiaries, or creditors who believe the asset should not be treated as trust property. Common grounds for opposition include lack of proof of the grantor’s intent, competing claims of ownership, or disputes about the validity of the trust or documents. An objection triggers additional litigation procedures that may require more extensive evidence, discovery, and potentially a hearing to resolve factual disputes. Because objections prolong resolution and increase cost, it is important to prepare the strongest possible evidentiary record before filing and to attempt resolution through discussion or mediation when feasible. Well-supported petitions that demonstrate clear intent and proper notice are more likely to be resolved without a contested trial, and careful preparation reduces the risk of successful opposition.
Costs include court filing fees, service fees, and legal fees for preparing the petition, declarations, and exhibits. Filing fees for probate-related petitions vary by county and by the nature of the request, while legal fees depend on the complexity of the case and whether the matter is contested. In straightforward, uncontested situations, total expense can be modest relative to full probate, particularly when parties agree and a short hearing suffices. When disputes arise, costs increase due to additional briefing, discovery, and court appearances. Counsel typically provides an estimate after an initial review and explains how different scenarios may affect cost. Early organization of documents and cooperative discussions among interested parties can significantly reduce legal expense compared with litigated alternatives.
A Heggstad petition resolves ownership questions but does not erase valid liens or creditor claims. If a property is encumbered, the petition clarifies ownership but creditors retain whatever rights they hold under law. The trustee will need to address existing liens, possibly by satisfying them from trust assets or negotiating with lienholders. The petition can, however, help identify stakeholders and bring them into the process so that claims are resolved as part of the administration. If creditor claims are likely, it may be necessary to coordinate the petition with probate procedures or creditor notice requirements to ensure proper handling. Counsel can advise on the interplay between a petition and outstanding obligations, and help structure filings that protect the trustee and beneficiaries while respecting creditors’ rights under California law.
When a deed cannot be located or was destroyed, a Heggstad petition can sometimes still be appropriate if other evidence shows the grantor intended the transfer into the trust. Courts consider the totality of the evidence, including drafting records, escrow communications, and witness statements about the decedent’s actions and intent. If a recreated or replacement deed exists or if there is credible testimony regarding the transfer, the petition may succeed in establishing trust ownership even without the original recorded deed. However, absence of a deed can complicate matters and increase the evidentiary burden. It may also make title companies reluctant to insure without additional orders or indemnities. Early collection of all available documentary and testimonial proof helps overcome gaps and supports court recognition of the trust’s claim to the property.
A Heggstad petition and a quiet title action have overlapping goals but are distinct procedures. A quiet title action is a broader lawsuit to resolve competing claims to property and to establish clear ownership against all adverse claims. A Heggstad petition specifically seeks judicial recognition that property should be treated as trust property based on the decedent’s intent. Quiet title actions often involve more extensive litigation and different procedural elements than a trust-focused petition. Choosing between the two depends on the nature of the dispute and the parties involved. When the primary issue is whether the decedent intended the property to be in the trust, a Heggstad petition is typically the targeted remedy. If there are multiple adverse claims or complex title disputes unrelated to trust funding, a quiet title action may be more appropriate.
While preparing a Heggstad petition, trustees should gather all relevant documents, preserve records, and communicate with beneficiaries to avoid surprises. Trustees should also collect contemporaneous evidence such as drafts, escrow papers, account statements, and any notes that reflect the grantor’s intent. Maintaining careful records of communications and actions taken in administration helps create a clear record for the court and reduces the potential for disputes. Trustees should also review the trust document and related estate planning instruments like pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives to identify any interrelated issues. Seeking early legal advice to assess whether a petition or alternative remedy is best helps trustees meet procedural requirements, comply with notice obligations, and act in a way that protects beneficiaries’ interests and follows the grantor’s documented wishes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas