A Heggstad petition can be an essential tool when assets were intended to be in a trust but title was never properly transferred. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in Rancho Calaveras, we help local families understand when such a petition may be appropriate and how it preserves the settlor’s intent. This introduction explains the basic purpose of a Heggstad petition, common situations that lead to its use, and how pursuing the petition can reduce probate exposure and align asset distribution with the trust document. If a trust was created but some assets remained in the settlor’s name, a Heggstad petition may be the path to correct that and honor the estate plan.
Many people discover gaps between their trust documents and asset ownership after a settlor’s passing. A Heggstad petition asks the court to confirm that an asset belonged to the trust based on the settlor’s intent and surrounding circumstances. This paragraph outlines typical evidence and timelines involved, including review of trust language, account statements, deeds, beneficiary designations, and communications that show intent. We work with families to assemble documentation, present clear factual narratives to the court, and pursue resolutions that reflect the trust maker’s plan, minimizing additional legal hurdles and preserving the estate’s intended distribution.
A Heggstad petition helps prevent unintended probate and aligns asset distribution with the trust maker’s wishes when title did not reflect the trust arrangement. This process can speed estate administration by clarifying ownership and preventing disputes among beneficiaries. Filing a petition can also provide legal recognition of transfer intent, which protects heirs from future challenges and reduces uncertainty for trustees handling distributions. In practice, pursuing a Heggstad petition often preserves estate value, limits court involvement to a focused ownership determination, and brings peace of mind to families seeking to honor the terms of a trust created during the settlor’s lifetime.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve Rancho Calaveras and broader Calaveras County with estate planning and trust administration services tailored to local needs. Our team focuses on careful review of trust documents, asset records, and the factual context that supports a Heggstad petition. We guide trustees and family members through evidence gathering, petition drafting, and court procedures while maintaining clear communication about options and anticipated timelines. Our approach emphasizes practical solutions that protect beneficiaries, reduce unnecessary litigation, and ensure the settlor’s property is treated consistent with their expressed intentions and estate plan.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial proceeding used to declare that property should be treated as trust property despite being titled in the settlor’s name. This paragraph explains the legal foundations of the petition, which rely on demonstrating the settlor’s clear intent to place the asset in trust. Evidence may include contemporaneous documents, beneficiary designations, correspondence with advisors or trustees, and transactional history. The court evaluates whether the asset was effectively intended for the trust and, if so, may order the asset treated as trust property to effectuate the settlor’s plan and promote orderly estate administration.
Not every asset mistakenly left in the settlor’s name will qualify for a Heggstad petition; success depends on a persuasive factual record. This paragraph covers common forms of proof and how trustees can build a case: bank and brokerage account records, deeds, beneficiary designations, signed trust paperwork, and communications showing the settlor’s direction. We emphasize early documentation and careful review to reduce disputes. Where evidence supports trust ownership, a Heggstad petition can streamline distribution and prevent assets from entering a broader probate administration.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to recognize an asset as part of a trust based on the settlor’s intent and surrounding circumstances at the time of transfer or trust creation. This paragraph covers how the court examines documentary evidence and factual context to determine whether property was intended to be held in trust. The petition seeks a narrow ruling focused on ownership rather than broader probate matters. When successful, it clarifies title for trustees and beneficiaries, enabling distributions in accordance with the trust document and avoiding additional probate proceedings for that asset.
Pursuing a Heggstad petition involves assembling clear evidence of the settlor’s intent, preparing a factual narrative, filing the petition with appropriate notices to interested parties, and presenting the matter to the court. Key elements include trust documents, account or deed records, correspondence showing intent, witness affidavits, and trustee actions that reflect administration consistent with trust ownership. The process often includes negotiation with heirs and beneficiaries to minimize contested hearings. Our role is to organize the record, draft persuasive pleadings, and pursue an outcome that aligns property ownership with the settlor’s plan while minimizing delay and expense.
Understanding common terms helps trustees and family members follow the petition process. This paragraph provides definitions for frequently used words and phrases in Heggstad matters, explains how they relate to proving trust intent, and highlights the documents most often used as proof. Clear comprehension of terms such as settlor, trustee, trust instrument, beneficiary designation, and title helps beneficiaries know what to expect during petition preparation and court review. Familiarity with these terms supports informed discussions with counsel and aids in assembling a thorough evidentiary record.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and whose intent is central to a Heggstad petition. This definition explains the settlor’s role in establishing the trust terms, funding the trust, and directing how property should be handled at incapacity or death. Evidence of the settlor’s actions and communications is the primary basis for demonstrating that an asset was meant to be held in trust. Understanding the settlor’s documented directions and contemporaneous actions helps a court determine whether title issues reflect a simple oversight or a substantive intention to exclude assets from the trust.
A trustee is the individual or entity appointed to manage trust assets and carry out the settlor’s directives. This definition clarifies how trustee actions, such as attempting to administer an asset as trust property, can support a Heggstad petition. Trustee records, account statements showing administration steps, and communications with financial institutions are types of evidence that courts often consider. The trustee’s role in presenting and preserving documentation is vital to establishing that a property should be treated as part of the trust for distribution purposes.
A beneficiary designation names who receives assets like retirement accounts or life insurance and can indicate the settlor’s intent regarding trust funding. This definition explains how inconsistent or omitted designations may affect ownership questions and how designations that name the trust can strengthen a Heggstad petition. Examining beneficiary forms alongside trust documents helps establish whether the settlor intended the asset to pass through the trust. Where designations and trust terms align, the court may be more likely to recognize trust ownership.
Title and deed records show how property is legally held and are central to ownership disputes addressed by a Heggstad petition. This definition explains the difference between formal title and equitable intent and how courts reconcile those concepts. Even when title remains in the settlor’s name, deeds, transfer documents, and supporting evidence of intention can persuade a court to treat the property as trust assets. Accurate and complete title documentation, combined with corroborating evidence, is a cornerstone of any successful petition.
When assets remain titled outside a trust, families have choices: pursue a Heggstad petition, open probate administration, or seek negotiated resolutions among heirs. This paragraph compares these options, outlining benefits and tradeoffs for each path, including time frames, costs, and potential impacts on privacy and distribution. A Heggstad petition targets ownership questions for specific assets and can avoid broader probate. Probate may be necessary for non-trust assets with complex claims, while negotiated settlements can be efficient when parties agree. Choosing the right approach depends on the factual record, family dynamics, and the settlor’s documented intent.
A focused petition can be appropriate when documentary evidence strongly supports that an asset was meant to be held in trust. This paragraph discusses the types of records that can justify a limited approach, such as signed trust language, contemporaneous account transfers, or beneficiary forms naming the trust. When such documentation exists, pursuing a Heggstad petition can avoid the expense and publicity of probate and provide a narrowly tailored legal determination about ownership. Parties benefit from a streamlined process that confirms title consistent with the settlor’s expressed intentions.
A limited petition is often suitable when heirs and beneficiaries do not contest the settlor’s intention and there is cooperation among interested parties. This paragraph emphasizes that when family members are aligned, the petition can proceed more smoothly, reducing the need for contested hearings. Cooperative resolution conserves estate resources and allows trustees to focus on administration rather than litigation. In such circumstances, the court can often issue a clear ownership determination based on the record without extended adversarial proceedings.
A comprehensive legal approach is recommended when multiple heirs claim the asset or when documentary evidence is ambiguous. This paragraph explains how layered legal work—including investigative discovery, witness testimony, and careful litigation strategy—can be necessary to resolve contested ownership. When intent is disputed, courts require a fuller evidentiary presentation to reach a reliable outcome. Comprehensive representation helps safeguard the trustee and beneficiaries while navigating complex factual patterns, adverse claims, and procedural requirements that can arise in contested matters.
Complex assets, such as accounts held across financial institutions or property with title in multiple jurisdictions, often call for a broader strategy. This paragraph covers how coordinated legal work helps gather documentation, communicate with institutions, and address cross-jurisdictional title issues. A multifaceted approach can include trust administration tasks, tailored pleadings, and negotiation to avoid protracted litigation. Ensuring all appropriate filings, notices, and evidentiary support are in place reduces the risk of future challenges and clarifies paths for lawful transfer of assets to the trust.
A comprehensive approach builds a robust evidentiary record, addresses potential disputes proactively, and reduces the chance that ownership questions will surface later. This paragraph explains how thorough document review, witness statements, communications with institutions, and well-crafted pleadings produce a persuasive presentation to the court. By preparing for foreseeable objections and clarifying the settlor’s intent, trustees and beneficiaries secure a more reliable resolution. This approach can save time and estate resources in the long run by avoiding repeated litigation or follow-up proceedings.
Beyond resolving immediate title questions, a careful process preserves estate value and protects fiduciaries from later challenges. This paragraph discusses how comprehensive preparation includes evaluating tax consequences, coordinating with other estate administration tasks, and communicating with beneficiaries to reduce misunderstandings. A thoughtful plan helps maintain family relationships by providing transparent explanations and fair processes. In short, a comprehensive approach seeks not only a legal determination but also a practical outcome that supports orderly distribution and minimizes the risk of future disputes.
Building a strong record minimizes the likelihood of successful challenges and clarifies ownership for trustees and beneficiaries. This paragraph explains how compiling thorough documentary evidence, securing witness affidavits, and addressing potential procedural issues upfront reduces the risk of prolonged litigation. A robust approach helps the court view the petition as a reasonable and well-supported effort to honor the settlor’s wishes, making it more likely to grant relief without extended dispute. That protection benefits both family relationships and estate resources.
Careful preparation often leads to more predictable timelines and avoids the surprises that can delay distribution. This paragraph notes that when evidence is organized and communication with interested parties is clear, courts can resolve ownership questions more efficiently. Predictability helps trustees manage distributions and allows beneficiaries to plan for their financial futures. Ultimately, the time invested in comprehensive preparation pays dividends in smoother administration and fewer post-resolution disputes.
Begin by collecting trust instruments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence showing the settlor’s intent. This paragraph explains why early document collection is essential: timely evidence preserves context, prevents gaps in the record, and enables a credible narrative for the petition. Consider bank statements, transfer instructions, emails with advisors, and trust funding notes. Organizing documents before filing helps speed the process, reduces the need for follow-up discovery, and strengthens the presentation to the court, improving the chances of a favorable ownership determination.
Keep copies of communications, signed instructions, and contemporaneous notes that reflect the settlor’s direction to fund the trust. This paragraph highlights the kinds of evidence courts find persuasive and suggests steps to preserve them, such as saving emails, obtaining affidavits from witnesses, and securing institutional records. Timely preservation reduces the risk that critical proof will be lost or questioned. A well-documented record supports trustee decisions and helps the court understand the factual basis for treating the asset as part of the trust.
If assets remain titled outside an established trust, a Heggstad petition can restore the settlor’s intended plan without full probate. This paragraph explains how the petition can protect asset transfers that were overlooked or mis-titled, helping beneficiaries receive property as the trust maker intended. Pursuing the petition reduces the possibility of assets entering broader probate, aids trustees in clear administration, and protects family members from the uncertainty that arises when title and documented intent do not match. Consider this option when preservation of the trust’s terms is the priority.
Families should consider this service when clarity and finality are needed for specific assets. This paragraph discusses how securing a court determination under a Heggstad petition can settle ownership concerns and reduce later disputes. When evidence supports trust ownership, the petition offers a targeted solution that aligns with estate planning goals and helps trustees carry out distributions promptly. Seeking resolution through a petition can be a practical choice to honor the settlor’s plan and provide beneficiaries with a clear path toward receiving their intended inheritances.
Typical circumstances include recently executed trusts where funding was incomplete, deeds or accounts left in the settlor’s name, and beneficiary designations that conflict with trust intentions. This paragraph surveys common patterns that prompt petitions and explains why each scenario may call for a legal determination: incomplete funding often results from oversight, transfers that occurred informally may lack recorded documentation, and conflicting beneficiary forms can create ambiguity. Understanding these scenarios helps trustees assess whether pursuing a Heggstad petition is appropriate.
When property was meant to be moved into a trust but title was not updated, a Heggstad petition can establish that the settlor intended the asset for the trust. This paragraph explains how mistakes happen—such as during relocation or when accounts are consolidated—and how the petition process corrects the record. By showing intent through documents and witness statements, trustees can seek a court order recognizing trust ownership and enable distribution consistent with the trust terms rather than probate rules.
Conflicts between beneficiary designations and trust provisions can create uncertainty about asset distribution. This paragraph discusses how a Heggstad petition helps resolve whether the settlor intended an asset to pass under the trust or directly to named beneficiaries. Courts examine the totality of evidence, including the trust document, beneficiary forms, and the settlor’s communications. Clarifying these conflicts protects the wishes of the trust maker and guides trustees in administering the asset correctly.
Sometimes accounts are retained in the settlor’s name for convenience even after the trust is created, leading to confusion after death. This paragraph explains how administrative practices during life may not reflect final ownership intentions and how a Heggstad petition allows the court to interpret those practices in light of the trust. When documentation and transactions indicate the settlor treated the asset as part of the trust, the court can direct that the asset be handled consistent with the trust terms.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide local guidance for families facing funding gaps between trusts and titled assets in Rancho Calaveras and nearby communities. This paragraph describes our availability to meet with trustees and family members, review documents, evaluate evidence, and outline possible next steps. We focus on practical solutions to establish trust ownership where appropriate and coordinate with financial institutions, title companies, and court clerks to move matters forward efficiently. Our goal is to support trustees in carrying out the settlor’s intentions with clarity and professionalism.
Clients turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for thoughtful handling of trust funding and ownership disputes because we combine careful document review with clear communication. This paragraph explains our commitment to preparing thorough petition materials, explaining legal options, and pursuing outcomes that reflect the settlor’s plan. We prioritize practical solutions that minimize disruption to families and focus on protecting beneficiaries’ interests while preserving estate assets through deliberate procedural steps and attention to evidentiary detail.
Our local knowledge of Calaveras County probate practice and relationships with court personnel help families navigate procedural requirements efficiently. This paragraph outlines how familiarity with local procedures, filing expectations, and clerical practices reduces delays and improves the petition’s presentation. We work to streamline interactions with institutions and interested parties, ensuring necessary notices and documentation are in order so the court can make an informed decision about ownership consistent with the trust maker’s wishes.
We also emphasize clear client communication throughout the process, offering realistic timelines and explaining likely evidentiary needs. This paragraph describes our approach to keeping trustees informed, preparing them for potential hearings, and seeking negotiated resolutions when feasible. The goal is to achieve a lawful and lasting determination about asset ownership that respects the settlor’s plan and reduces the prospect of further litigation for the family.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust, asset records, deeds, and beneficiary forms to assess the strength of the claim that an asset belongs to the trust. This paragraph outlines steps including document collection, drafting a factual petition, serving interested parties, and presenting the case to the court. We prioritize building a clear narrative demonstrating the settlor’s intent and coordinating with trustees to ensure notices and administration tasks are handled properly. Throughout, we communicate expectations and next steps so families understand the timeline and potential outcomes.
We start by carefully reviewing trust instruments, account records, deeds, and any communications that reflect the settlor’s directions. This paragraph explains how gathering and organizing these materials provides the foundation for a Heggstad petition. We identify key documents that support trust ownership, evaluate gaps, and determine whether additional records or witness statements are needed. A thorough initial assessment clarifies the likely path forward and allows trustees to make informed decisions about filing a petition or pursuing alternative solutions.
We examine the trust document closely alongside deeds, account statements, and beneficiary designations to identify evidence of intended funding. This paragraph details how the congruence or disparity between trust terms and title records guides strategy. By locating signed pages, transfer instructions, and contemporaneous notes, we can assemble a strong factual account to present to the court. The review determines whether supplemental discovery or witness affidavits will strengthen the petition and informs the timeline for filing.
Where necessary, we collect witness affidavits and request records from financial institutions or title companies that can corroborate the settlor’s intent. This paragraph explains how such statements and institutional confirmations often fill evidentiary gaps and create a clearer narrative for the court. Coordinating record requests early helps preserve crucial evidence and provides a factual basis for the petition. These materials support a persuasive presentation and reduce the likelihood of contested proceedings whenever possible.
After collecting evidence, we draft a focused petition that frames the factual record and legal arguments for treating the asset as trust property. This paragraph describes how the pleading sets out the trust provisions, documentation, witness statements, and statutory authority supporting the requested relief. We ensure proper service on interested parties, prepare necessary declarations, and submit supporting exhibits so the court has a complete record. Careful drafting reduces procedural objections and helps the court evaluate the matter efficiently.
Declarations from trustees, witnesses, and custodian records are assembled as exhibits to establish a clear factual record. This paragraph explains how properly prepared declarations tie together the documentary evidence and provide a coherent narrative for the court to consider. Exhibits such as deeds, account histories, and copies of trust pages are organized and cited in the petition to make it straightforward for the judge to review the basis for the requested order recognizing trust ownership.
We ensure all required notices are served on beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties in accordance with probate rules. This paragraph details the importance of proper notice to protect the record and to allow any interested person the opportunity to respond. Adequate notification reduces the risk of procedural challenges later and encourages resolution when parties agree. Keeping service records and proofs of mailing/documentation is an integral part of filing a petition that stands up to scrutiny.
Once the petition is filed and noticed, the court reviews the record and may schedule a hearing or rule on submitted papers. This paragraph covers possible outcomes, including an uncontested order recognizing trust ownership or a contested hearing where additional testimony is taken. We prepare trustees and witnesses for hearings, respond to opposing filings, and present a focused case to the court. The goal is to secure a clear determination that aligns asset title with the settlor’s intentions.
If a hearing is needed, we prepare witness statements, exhibits, and clear legal arguments to support the petition. This paragraph outlines how structured preparation helps the court understand the factual record and the trust’s terms. We rehearse testimony, organize exhibits for efficient presentation, and anticipate common challenges so the trustee is ready. Effective hearing preparation increases the likelihood of the court granting relief without prolonged litigation.
After the court rules, the order confirming trust ownership must be implemented with institutions to transfer title or update records. This paragraph explains how we assist trustees in presenting the order to banks, title companies, and other custodians so the asset is administered under the trust. Follow-through ensures the practical effect of the court’s decision is realized and that trustees can distribute property per the trust terms without further delay.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial request asking the court to recognize an asset as trust property based on the settlor’s intent and the surrounding facts. The petition is used when title remains in the settlor’s name despite evidence that the asset was intended to be part of an existing trust. It focuses on whether the settlor meant to transfer the property into the trust, relying on documentary and testimonial evidence that demonstrates intent and the circumstances of how the asset was handled during the settlor’s life. This process is narrower than a full probate administration because it targets ownership of specific assets rather than administering an entire estate. When successful, a Heggstad petition allows trustees to treat the asset as trust property for purposes of distribution and management, avoiding expanded probate for that particular item and aligning the outcome with the settlor’s documented wishes.
An asset may qualify for a Heggstad petition when there is persuasive evidence the settlor intended the property to be held in trust but formal title was not updated. Helpful indicators include trust language referencing the asset, beneficiary designations naming the trust, transaction records showing transfers to trust accounts, contemporaneous correspondence, and trustee actions that reflect administration of the property as trust assets. The more coherent and contemporaneous the evidence, the stronger the case for the petition. Qualification also depends on the nature of the asset and the presence of interested parties who may contest ownership. We assess the documentation, interview witnesses, and review institutional records to determine whether the available proof is likely to persuade a court. If gaps exist, supplemental evidence such as affidavits or additional records can sometimes bridge them and improve the petition’s prospects.
Documents that most often prove trust intent include the trust instrument itself, deeds or account statements showing attempted transfers, beneficiary designation forms naming the trust, and contemporaneous written instructions or correspondence with advisors. These materials show the settlor’s plan and actions to fund the trust. Organized records that establish a timeline and demonstrate consistent intent are particularly persuasive to courts evaluating a Heggstad petition. In addition to written evidence, witness statements and affidavits from individuals who observed the settlor’s intent or assisted with transfers can reinforce the case. Institutional records from banks, brokers, and title companies that confirm communications or attempted transfers provide objective support. Together, these elements create a factual picture that helps the court determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies based on the completeness of the record, whether interested parties contest the petition, and court schedules. If documentation is thorough and parties are cooperative, the process can move more quickly, with the court reviewing submitted papers or setting a short hearing schedule. Gathering records and preparing a well-documented petition typically requires careful organization, which can influence the initial timing. Contested matters take longer because additional discovery, briefing, and hearings may be necessary. Local court calendars and the need for witness testimony also affect duration. We provide realistic timelines after the initial assessment and work to expedite the matter where possible by ensuring filings are complete and service requirements are promptly met.
A Heggstad petition can prevent specific assets from entering probate by having the court declare them trust property, but it does not automatically eliminate probate for an entire estate. The petition is a targeted remedy for particular items whose title is inconsistent with the settlor’s intent. When successful, it allows trustees to administer and distribute recognized trust assets without subjecting those items to probate administration. However, other assets that are not the subject of a petition or that clearly require probate may still go through estate administration. The petition reduces probate exposure for identified assets but does not substitute for a comprehensive estate administration when broader probate matters exist for other property.
Yes, beneficiaries or heirs may challenge a Heggstad petition if they believe the asset should pass outside the trust or if they dispute the evidence of intent. This paragraph explains how contested petitions involve additional discovery, affidavits, and potentially evidentiary hearings where parties present competing factual accounts. The court evaluates credibility and documentary proof to reach a determination, so contested matters require careful preparation and response to opposing claims. Even in contested situations, many matters are resolved through negotiation or limited evidentiary submissions rather than full trials. Early communication and transparent sharing of key documents can sometimes reduce the scope of disputes and lead to agreements that obviate prolonged litigation, preserving estate resources and family relationships.
Costs for a Heggstad petition depend on the complexity of the record, whether the matter is contested, and the time required for document collection, drafting, service, and court appearances. This paragraph outlines typical cost factors such as record retrieval, preparation of declarations and exhibits, filing fees, and attorney time spent analyzing issues and preparing pleadings. Straightforward, uncontested petitions generally cost less than contested matters that require discovery and hearings. We provide an initial assessment of likely costs after reviewing the specific facts and documents. Where possible, we pursue efficiencies such as focused record requests and negotiation with interested parties to limit time spent on contested litigation, seeking a cost-effective resolution that honors the settlor’s intentions while preserving estate resources.
When a court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, banks, title companies, and other custodians typically require a certified copy of the order and governing trust pages to update records or retitle assets. This paragraph explains how institutions follow their internal procedures to implement the court’s decision, which may include processing transfers, updating account registrations, or changing deed records. Prompt submission of the order and relevant documentation helps ensure institutions comply efficiently. In some cases, institutions may request additional confirmations or paperwork; our role includes coordinating with those entities to satisfy their requirements and facilitate the practical transfer or administration of the asset under the trust. Clear presentation of the court order and supporting trust documents usually resolves institutional concerns and enables trustees to proceed with distribution.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include negotiating a settlement among interested parties, using a simple corrective deed or transfer if all necessary signatures are obtainable, or pursuing full probate where appropriate. This paragraph discusses how negotiation can be efficient when heirs agree and documentation is straightforward, avoiding court involvement and cost. Simple transfers may resolve title issues when parties are cooperative and legal formalities can be completed without litigation. However, when evidence is contested or parties disagree, a petition offers a formal avenue to secure a clear legal determination. The choice among alternatives depends on the factual record, family dynamics, and the practical objective of aligning asset ownership with the settlor’s expressed intent while minimizing expense and delay.
When a trustee discovers an untransferred asset, the first step is to preserve records and gather all relevant documentation showing the settlor’s intent, including trust instruments, account statements, deeds, and any communications regarding the asset. This paragraph stresses the importance of prompt preservation to maintain context and prevent evidence loss. Early organization of documents creates a stronger initial record for assessing whether a petition or other corrective action is appropriate. Next, trustees should notify interested parties and seek legal guidance on the most appropriate procedure, whether that is a corrective transfer, negotiation, or filing a Heggstad petition. Legal counsel helps evaluate the evidentiary strength, ensures proper notices are given, and prepares any filings needed to secure a lawful and durable resolution that honors the settlor’s plan and protects trustees from later challenges.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas