A Heggstad petition can be an important step for beneficiaries who need to transfer assets from an intestate probate administration into a trust to preserve the decedent’s intent. In Williams and throughout Colusa County, families rely on clear legal guidance to determine when a Heggstad petition is appropriate and how the process works. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with trust administration matters including preparation and filing of petitions, gathering supporting documentation, and representing clients in court hearings. This overview explains the petition purpose, likely outcomes, and practical steps involved for people confronting trust-versus-probate issues in Williams.
Many people first encounter the Heggstad petition when an asset was transferred to a decedent but not properly titled in the trust before death. The petition asks the court to recognize that the decedent intended the property to be part of their revocable living trust, allowing distribution under trust terms rather than through intestacy rules. This can simplify distribution and align outcomes with the decedent’s plan. Our Williams practice focuses on practical resolution, compiling declarations and trust documents, and explaining timelines and likely next steps so clients can make informed choices about pursuing a petition.
A Heggstad petition can prevent unintended distribution under intestate succession rules and preserve the decedent’s trust plan, which often better reflects financial planning and family wishes. Benefits include directing assets to designated trust beneficiaries, avoiding prolonged probate for the affected asset, and clarifying title for banks or other institutions. The petition process also creates a clear judicial record that the property was intended to belong to a trust, which can reduce later disputes among heirs. For Williams families, pursuing this petition may save time, reduce costs related to disputed ownership, and allow trustees or beneficiaries to access trust assets more smoothly.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services to clients across Northern California, including Williams and Colusa County. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, clear communication with beneficiaries and fiduciaries, and proactive problem solving to resolve titling and trust administration issues. We prepare necessary declarations, coordinate with financial institutions, and handle court filings and hearings when a Heggstad petition is required. Clients appreciate practical guidance about timelines and realistic outcomes so they can decide whether to proceed and how to pursue an efficient resolution that respects the decedent’s intentions.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to confirm that property should be treated as trust property even though transfer formalities were not completed prior to death. This remedy typically arises when a decedent intended trust ownership but the title remained in the decedent’s name, or when an asset was transferred to a trustee but paperwork was incomplete. The petition requires evidence of the decedent’s intent, trust documents, and declarations from witnesses or the trustee. Understanding the standard of proof and preparing thorough supporting materials can increase the chance the court will grant the petition and allow the trustee to administer the asset under the trust.
When pursuing a Heggstad petition, parties must gather copies of the trust, any relevant deeds or account statements, and testimony or declarations showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Courts review whether the transfer was intended to take effect during the decedent’s lifetime or at death. The process often involves filing a petition, providing notice to interested parties, and attending a hearing where the court evaluates the evidence. Attorneys commonly assist with drafting the petition, preparing declarations, and resolving disputes to reduce delays and help the trustee secure the proper title to the property.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request submitted to a probate court to recognize property as trust property despite incomplete formal transfer. It derives its name from case law addressing circumstances where a decedent’s intent to fund a trust must be honored even if the title was not changed. The petition seeks a court order that the asset belonged to the trust at the time of the decedent’s death, allowing the trustee to administer and distribute the property under trust provisions. Filing such a petition can resolve uncertainty about ownership, prevent intestate distribution, and enable beneficiaries to receive assets consistent with the decedent’s plan.
Successful Heggstad petitions typically rest on clear documentation of the trust and credible evidence of the decedent’s intent to include the property in the trust. Essential elements include a copy of the trust instrument, statements or deeds showing attempted transfer, and sworn declarations from trustees, attorneys, or family members describing the decedent’s actions and statements. The procedural process requires filing the petition, serving notice to heirs and possible creditors, and attending a hearing where the court evaluates the evidence. Prompt preparation of declarations and obtaining supporting documents from financial institutions or county records can streamline the process and reduce the chance of contested litigation.
Understanding common terms helps beneficiaries and fiduciaries navigate Heggstad petitions. Terms include trust instrument, trustee, beneficiary, probate court, intestacy, declaration, and title. Knowing what these words mean clarifies responsibilities and potential outcomes. For instance, a trustee manages trust assets according to the trust terms, while probate court adjudicates disputes about property distribution. The glossary below defines core concepts and how they relate to petitions seeking recognition of trust ownership for assets with incomplete formal transfers, helping Williams residents make informed decisions.
A trust instrument is the written document that creates the trust, sets out its terms, identifies the trustee and beneficiaries, and explains how assets are to be managed and distributed. It serves as the foundational proof in a Heggstad petition, establishing that the decedent intended certain property to be controlled by the trust. Courts will examine the trust document to determine whether the decedent’s stated plan supports recognition of a particular asset as trust property despite defective title. Having clear, timely copies of the trust instrument is essential for petition preparation and supporting judicial relief.
A declaration is a sworn written statement submitted to the court describing relevant facts, such as the decedent’s statements or actions indicating intent to fund a trust. Declarations from trustees, attorneys, family members, or witnesses help the court understand the circumstances surrounding the attempted transfer and the decedent’s intent. Well-drafted declarations explain the sequence of events, reference supporting documents, and present evidence in a concise, credible way. These documents often play a pivotal role in persuading the court to grant a Heggstad petition when title paperwork is incomplete.
Probate court is the judicial forum where disputes about estate administration, trust recognition, and property distribution are resolved. When a Heggstad petition is filed, the probate court reviews the trust documents, declarations, and supporting evidence to decide whether to treat the asset as trust property. The court also ensures proper notice is given to interested parties and oversees hearings and orders. Familiarity with local probate procedures and timelines in Colusa County helps petitioners prepare filings correctly and anticipate the steps required to obtain a judicial determination.
Intestacy occurs when someone dies without a valid will or when certain assets are not properly transferred and therefore must be distributed according to statutory rules. A Heggstad petition often seeks to prevent intestacy from governing the distribution of an asset by proving the decedent intended the asset to belong to a trust. If successful, the court will allow distribution under the trust rather than the default intestate scheme, which may not reflect the decedent’s wishes. Clarifying title through a petition helps align asset distribution with the trust plan.
When assets intended for a trust end up titled in a decedent’s name, families can consider several legal paths including Heggstad petitions, formal probate proceedings, or negotiated transfers among heirs. A Heggstad petition aims to have the court recognize trust ownership without full probate, which can be faster and more consistent with the decedent’s plan. Probate may be necessary for other assets or where disputes arise. Negotiation and settlement can resolve some matters without court involvement but requires cooperation among interested parties. Evaluating the facts, costs, and likely timelines helps determine which route best meets the family’s needs in Williams.
A limited approach may be appropriate when the asset at issue has modest value and all interested parties agree on its handling under the trust. In such cases, the parties might be able to coordinate with the financial institution or county recorder to transfer title without a court petition, provided the institution accepts the presented documentation. Informal resolution reduces legal expense and time. However, when a bank or title company requires a court order or when heirs disagree, pursuing a formal Heggstad petition may be necessary to create a binding judicial determination that ensures finality and protects beneficiaries’ interests.
When documentary evidence clearly shows the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust, and relevant institutions accept that evidence, a court petition may be avoidable. Examples include express written transfer instructions combined with contemporaneous trust documents and communications that confirm intent. In those circumstances, a trustee can often present the required paperwork to a title company or financial institution for direct retitling. This approach saves time and expense, but it depends on cooperation by the institution and agreement among interested parties; otherwise, a Heggstad petition remains a reliable path.
When heirs disagree about whether an asset should be treated as trust property or when third parties contest ownership, a comprehensive legal approach becomes important to protect beneficiaries’ rights. This often involves filing a Heggstad petition, assembling detailed declarations, obtaining documentary evidence, and presenting the case to the probate court. A full legal strategy addresses potential defenses, explores settlement options, and prepares for hearings to secure a definitive court order. Taking a proactive approach reduces the risk of lingering disputes that can delay administration and increase expense for everyone involved.
Financial institutions, county recorders, and title companies sometimes refuse to retitle assets without a court order, particularly when paperwork is inconsistent or missing. In such circumstances, relying on negotiated resolution may be impossible, and a Heggstad petition can provide the necessary judicial authorization for retitling. A comprehensive legal approach anticipates these institutional hurdles by preparing the documentation and legal arguments needed to secure court approval and ensuring proper notice and procedural compliance so the resulting order will be accepted by third parties handling asset transfers.
A comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition helps protect beneficiaries by producing clear court orders, resolving competing claims, and ensuring institutions will accept the resulting determinations. Thorough preparation reduces the likelihood of delays caused by missing documents or inadequate declarations. It also creates a defensible record if issues arise later. For families in Williams, taking a full legal route can streamline title transfers, minimize future disputes, and provide certainty that assets will be administered according to the trust, not default intestacy rules.
Comprehensive representation includes reviewing all relevant trust and property documentation, drafting persuasive declarations, coordinating notice to interested parties, and advocating at any required hearing. This method mitigates risks that informal transfers might leave unresolved, such as challenges to the decedent’s intent or procedural defects. By securing a judicial determination, beneficiaries often gain faster access to trust assets and stronger protection against subsequent claims. The additional planning and documentation required upfront can save time and expense over the long term when compared with protracted disputes.
One major benefit of a full legal approach is the finality that a court order provides. When a Heggstad petition is granted, the court’s ruling establishes that the asset belonged to the trust, creating a clear basis for distribution and title transfer. This certainty helps prevent future claims from disrupting administration and reduces stress for beneficiaries. It also gives institutions the assurance they need to retitle assets and release funds, facilitating practical steps required to complete the estate or trust administration process efficiently.
By creating a documented judicial record, a comprehensive petition strategy reduces the potential for future challenges to the disposition of the asset. A well-prepared case with supporting declarations and documentary proof makes it harder for disgruntled heirs or third parties to relitigate ownership later. Courts generally favor clear evidence of the decedent’s intent, and obtaining a court order minimizes the risk of subsequent disputes that can drain time and resources from the estate or trust. This protective value is particularly important for families seeking closure and orderly administration.
Begin by collecting the trust instrument, deed, account statements, and any written instructions related to the asset in question. Early documentation allows you to build a clear factual record showing the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Contact financial institutions and county recorders to request copies of account histories or recorded deeds. Timely collection reduces delays when preparing declarations and filing the petition. Organizing documents also helps identify potential hurdles and supports a smoother interaction with the probate court and third parties who may require proof before retitling.
Contact banks, title companies, or county recorders to learn their requirements for retitling assets into a trust. Some institutions will accept trust documents and affidavits, while others may insist on a court order. Understanding these requirements before filing a petition helps tailor the requested relief to meet third-party demands and avoids unnecessary filings. If a court order is necessary, plan for appropriate notice and hearings. Proactive communication with institutions often streamlines the process and reduces the chance of unexpected procedural obstacles.
Consider a Heggstad petition when an asset intended for the trust remains titled in the decedent’s name or when a financial institution refuses to retitle without court authorization. Filing seeks a judicial finding that the asset was part of the trust, enabling distribution according to the trust terms rather than by intestacy. This is especially important when the asset carries significant value, when heirs disagree, or when institutions demand a formal order. A petition can provide the legal clarity needed to avoid prolonged delays and ensure distributions align with the decedent’s wishes.
Another reason to pursue this service is to protect beneficiaries from future claims by establishing a clear court determination now. When property transitions are disputed or documentation is incomplete, a Heggstad petition resolves questions of title, facilitates retitling, and creates a judicial record that supports orderly trust administration. The process also helps trustees fulfill their fiduciary duties by obtaining the authority needed to manage or distribute the asset. For families seeking closure and finality, the petition offers a dependable legal mechanism to achieve those objectives.
Typical circumstances include bank accounts, real estate, or retirement accounts that were meant to be trust assets but remained titled in the decedent’s name, transfers started but not completed, and disagreements among heirs about ownership. Other situations arise when an attorney or trustee thought retitling had occurred but records do not reflect it. In each case, the petition asks the court to correct the record and recognize trust ownership. Identifying the specific scenario and collecting supporting evidence are the first steps toward a successful petition in Williams and Colusa County.
Real estate often triggers Heggstad petitions when a deed was prepared or intended to be executed conveying the property to the trustee but recording never occurred before death. When ownership still shows the decedent as the title owner, a petition can establish that the property should be administered under the trust. This remedy helps transfer title properly and allows the trustee to handle sale or distribution according to the trust terms, avoiding intestate distribution. Accurate deeds, tax statements, and witness declarations strengthen the petition in such cases.
Occasionally bank or investment accounts intended to be trust assets remain in the decedent’s name due to oversight or institutional requirements. Financial institutions may require a court order to permit retitling or release funds to the trustee. Filing a Heggstad petition and presenting account statements, trust documents, and declarations can persuade the court to issue the order banks need. The process clarifies ownership and enables trustees to access assets for trust administration, creditor payments, or distributions to beneficiaries as intended by the trust.
Sometimes paperwork reflecting the decedent’s intent is incomplete or inconsistent, such as unsigned transfer documents or conflicting records between institutions. These discrepancies create uncertainty that can impede retitling and distribution. A Heggstad petition allows the court to examine all relevant evidence and reconcile conflicting accounts by making a legal determination about the decedent’s intent. Providing clear declarations and documentary proof can bring the court to a well-reasoned finding that resolves the conflict and facilitates orderly trust administration.
If you are in Williams or nearby communities and face mis-titled trust assets, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help guide you through the Heggstad petition process. We assist with document collection, drafting persuasive declarations, and handling court filings and hearings. Our local knowledge of probate procedures in Colusa County helps anticipate procedural requirements and institution expectations. Clients receive practical advice on cost-effective options and steps to protect benefits for trust beneficiaries while seeking prompt resolution and secure title transfer for the affected property.
Choosing counsel familiar with trust administration and local probate practice can streamline the Heggstad petition process. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman brings experience handling trust and probate matters, including petitions to recognize trust property. We focus on gathering the right evidence, preparing clear legal documents, and communicating with institutions and interested parties to reduce delays. This approach helps trustees and beneficiaries understand the path forward and secures necessary court orders when informal solutions are unavailable or contested.
Our firm assists clients by reviewing the trust and related documents, preparing declarations that explain the decedent’s intent, and filing petitions that meet probate court requirements. We coordinate notice to heirs and manage communications with banks and title companies when required. For Williams residents, having an attorney familiar with local procedures can shorten timelines, avoid avoidable defects in filings, and reduce stress for families navigating sensitive matters after a death. We prioritize clear explanations and practical outcomes aligned with the trust’s goals.
We also explore alternatives when appropriate, such as communicating with institutions to determine whether retitling can occur without court intervention. When litigation is necessary, we prepare the factual record and present the case to the court in a focused manner. Our objective is to achieve a prompt, enforceable resolution that allows trustees to carry out the trust terms and beneficiaries to receive their rightful distributions. Clients receive guidance on expected timelines, likely costs, and procedural steps from start to finish.
Our process begins with a document review and case assessment to determine whether a Heggstad petition is the best path. We gather trust instruments, property records, account statements, and witness declarations, then prepare a petition tailored to the facts. We handle service and notice requirements to interested parties, file the petition with the probate court, and represent clients at hearings if needed. Communication with institutions is coordinated to ensure they receive the court’s order and can retitle assets. Throughout, we update clients on progress and next steps to promote efficient resolution.
The initial stage focuses on evaluating whether the facts support a Heggstad petition and identifying the documents needed to substantiate the decedent’s intent. We request copies of the trust, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence or drafts relating to transfers. Gathering clear documentary evidence at the outset reduces delays and helps craft persuasive declarations. We also identify interested parties who must be notified and assess whether alternative resolutions with institutions are possible before filing a petition with the probate court.
A careful review of the trust instrument and property records determines whether the trust language and documentation support recognition of the asset as trust property. We examine deed history, account registrations, and any transfer-related paperwork to identify gaps or inconsistencies. This step clarifies what evidence will most effectively show the decedent’s intent and guides drafting of supporting declarations. Identifying these issues early allows us to collect supplemental proof from financial institutions or county records offices as needed for the petition.
We determine who must be given notice of the petition, including beneficiaries, heirs, and possibly creditors, and prepare the appropriate notice and service documents. Proper notice ensures the court process proceeds lawfully and reduces the risk of future challenges. We also look for potential contesting parties so the petition can anticipate likely objections and address them in initial filings. Handling these procedural requirements early helps keep the case on track and avoids delays caused by defective service or missed parties.
After assembling evidence and declarations, we draft a petition that explains the facts, references the trust instrument, and requests court recognition that the asset belonged to the trust at the decedent’s death. The filing includes supporting documents and declarations attesting to the decedent’s intent and any attempted transfers. We ensure the petition complies with local probate rules and scheduling practices, and submit required forms and fees to the court. Accurate, well-supported filings improve the chance of a prompt hearing and favorable ruling.
Declarations from trustees, attorneys, and witnesses are drafted to be factual, concise, and well-supported by exhibits such as deeds, account statements, and correspondence. Exhibits are organized and cited within the petition to make the court’s review straightforward. Strong presentation of the facts helps the judge understand the decedent’s intent without extensive testimony. Clear, documentary-backed declarations are often decisive in persuading the court to grant the requested relief and allow the trustee to retitle and administer the asset under the trust.
Once the petition and supporting materials are complete, we file them with the probate court and arrange for notice to be served on all interested parties per statutory requirements. Proper filing ensures compliance with local rules and sets dates for hearings or objections. We monitor court calendars and handle any follow-up filings requested by the court. Managing these procedural aspects carefully reduces the likelihood of delays caused by defective filings or omitted notices, keeping the matter moving toward resolution.
At the hearing, the court reviews evidence and may ask questions about the decedent’s intent, the trust terms, and the circumstances of the attempted transfer. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, which can then be presented to institutions or the county recorder for retitling. We ensure the order is prepared in the required form and provide guidance on presenting it to third parties. If objections arise, we advocate at the hearing to address concerns and seek a ruling consistent with the trust’s terms.
We represent trustees or beneficiaries at the hearing, presenting the petition, supporting declarations, and documentary exhibits that demonstrate the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. We respond to questions from the court and address any objections from other parties. Our role includes clarifying legal issues and emphasizing the evidence that supports recognition of the asset as trust property. Effective presentation at the hearing increases the likelihood the court will issue an order that institutions will accept for retitling and distribution.
After the court grants the petition, we obtain the signed order and provide certified or filed copies to banks, title companies, or county recorders as necessary. We advise trustees on steps to retitle property, access accounts, and proceed with administration or distribution under the trust. If institutions request additional documentation, we assist in compliance. Ensuring the order is accepted and transfers are completed closes the loop and allows the trustee to manage the asset according to the trust’s instructions.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that a specific asset should be considered trust property despite incomplete title formalities. It is typically used when the decedent intended for the property to be held in the trust but failed to complete the recording or retitling before death. The petition presents the trust instrument and supporting declarations or documents to show intent. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it can issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property and allow the trustee to administer it under the trust. Deciding to file depends on factors like the asset’s value, whether institutions will cooperate without a court order, and whether heirs agree. When banks or recorders require judicial authority to retitle property or when there is disagreement among interested parties, a Heggstad petition is often the safest route to secure a final determination and avoid future disputes.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on court schedules, notice periods, and whether objections arise. In some cases, uncontested petitions that are well-documented may be resolved within a few months, while contested matters or those requiring additional evidence can take longer. Local probate court calendars in Colusa County and staffing can also influence how quickly a hearing is scheduled and an order is issued. Preparation time also affects overall duration. Gathering trust documents, deeds, account statements, and declarations can require weeks of coordination. Anticipating institutional requirements and ensuring proper notice to interested parties helps avoid delays. Discussing timelines early allows clients to plan and understand anticipated steps toward resolution.
Courts typically expect to see the trust instrument, a deed or account statement showing the asset’s title, and sworn declarations that recount the decedent’s intent and actions regarding the transfer. Declarations from the trustee, attorney who assisted with planning, or family members who witnessed relevant statements are commonly used. Documentary evidence such as signed transfer instructions, drafts of deeds, or correspondence with a bank strengthens the petition by corroborating declarations. The credibility and specificity of declarations matter. Clear, factual statements that connect the decedent’s actions and statements to the trust provisions are persuasive. Supporting exhibits should be organized and cited within the petition so the judge can readily review the documentary record when deciding whether to recognize the asset as trust property.
In some cases, banks or title companies will accept trust documents and affidavits and agree to retitle assets without a court order. When institutions are cooperative and documentation is clear, direct retitling can be quicker and less costly than a court petition. Contacting the institution early to learn their procedures and requirements may allow retitling without the need for court involvement. However, some institutions insist on a court order before they will retitle or release funds, particularly if records are inconsistent or if potential heirs object. When institutions demand judicial authorization or when parties disagree, a Heggstad petition provides the formal legal relief necessary to effect the transfer and create a defensible record for future administration.
Statutory notice rules require that interested parties be notified of the Heggstad petition filing, including beneficiaries named in the trust and potential heirs who would inherit under intestacy if the asset were not treated as trust property. Serving notice gives those parties an opportunity to object or participate in the proceeding. Proper service and notice help ensure the court’s order will be legally effective and reduce the risk of later challenges based on defective procedure. Creditors may also need notice in some scenarios, depending on the circumstances. Identifying all parties who must receive notice is an important early step. Failing to provide required notice can result in delays or a need to refile, so careful attention to procedural requirements is essential to move the matter toward resolution.
If an heir objects to the Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and may schedule additional hearings or require further evidence. Objections commonly challenge the existence of intent to transfer the asset to the trust or dispute the sufficiency of the supporting documents. The petitioning party must be prepared to respond with stronger declarations, documentary proof, and legal argument to address objections and persuade the court to grant the requested relief. If objections cannot be resolved, the court may deny the petition or limit relief, in which case the asset could remain subject to probate distribution rules. In contested matters, settlement discussions or mediation may help parties reach an agreement without protracted litigation. Preparing a thorough factual record and considering negotiation options often improves the chance of a favorable outcome.
A Heggstad petition, when granted, provides a court order recognizing the asset as trust property and typically facilitates retitling. However, some institutions may require additional documentation or specific forms before completing the transfer. The court order is a strong basis for retitling, but practical completion of the transfer depends on meeting institutional policies and recording requirements for real property. Expect to coordinate with banks or recorders to finalize the change in title after receiving the order. In rare cases, if the court denies the petition or limits relief, the property may remain subject to probate. Ensuring petitions are well-supported and addressing foreseeable objections ahead of time increases the likelihood that the court’s order will be sufficient to achieve practical retitling and administration under the trust.
Costs to file a Heggstad petition vary based on case complexity, the need for additional discovery, and whether the matter is contested. Expenses typically include court filing fees, costs to obtain certified document copies, and legal fees for preparing the petition and declarations. Uncontested petitions that proceed smoothly can be more affordable, while contested matters requiring hearings or extended discovery will increase costs. Discussing expected fees and budgeting considerations at the outset helps clients plan for the process. Some aspects of cost can be managed by early document gathering and efforts to resolve issues with institutions before filing. We provide an initial assessment to estimate likely expenses and explore whether less formal avenues might suffice for retitling, balancing potential savings against the need for a secure judicial determination when disputes or institutional demands require it.
Yes, a trustee can file a Heggstad petition on behalf of the trust’s beneficiaries when the trustee believes an asset was intended to be part of the trust but remains mis-titled. Trustees have the legal authority and fiduciary duty to protect trust property and pursue necessary actions to collect and administer assets under the trust terms. Filing a petition is often part of a trustee’s responsibility to ensure trust assets are controlled and distributed according to the decedent’s plan. Trustees should act carefully to document their basis for filing, including trust provisions, supporting deeds or account statements, and declarations showing the decedent’s intent. Proper notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties is required, and trustees should be prepared to respond to objections. Engaging counsel helps trustees navigate procedural requirements and fulfill their duties while seeking an effective resolution.
Begin by reviewing available documents such as the trust instrument, deeds, and account statements to determine whether the asset appears to have been intended for the trust. Contact the institution holding the asset to learn what documentation they require for retitling. If the institution demands a court order or if there is disagreement among interested parties, gather declarations from those with direct knowledge of the decedent’s intent and consult with counsel about filing a Heggstad petition. An attorney can assess the facts, identify required evidence, and advise whether informal resolution is feasible or whether filing a petition is advisable. Early action to compile documents and secure credible declarations helps streamline the petition process and increase the chance of obtaining a timely court order recognized by institutions handling the asset transfer.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas