A trust modification petition can be necessary when circumstances change or when provisions in an existing trust no longer reflect the grantor’s intentions. In Blackhawk and broader Contra Costa County, California residents turn to focused estate planning counsel to evaluate whether a trust can be amended under the terms of the trust instrument or whether a court petition is required. This page explains the options for modifying a trust, covers legal standards that courts apply, and describes the practical steps a property owner or trustee may take to pursue a modification that protects assets and honors the trust maker’s goals.
Whether the modification involves correcting administrative errors, addressing changed family circumstances, or clarifying ambiguous provisions, it is important to assess how state law and the trust document interact. California law allows for certain modifications by the parties and, in some cases, by the court when there is sufficient cause. This guide discusses when a petition is advisable, what evidence is typically required, how beneficiaries and trustees are notified, and how the process affects tax planning, asset protection and the overall estate plan. Knowing options can reduce conflict and streamline resolution.
A trust modification petition can preserve the intent of the trust maker and prevent unintended consequences that arise when circumstances change. Seeking a modification can ensure distributions reflect current relationships, correct drafting mistakes, or respond to new tax laws or asset situations. When properly handled, a petition can minimize disputes among beneficiaries, clarify trustee powers, and protect trust assets from unnecessary litigation. By pursuing a formal modification, parties can create a clear, enforceable document that reduces ambiguity and supports smoother administration during the trust maker’s incapacity or after their death.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with trust planning and trust modification matters throughout the Bay Area, including San Jose and nearby counties. Our firm focuses on careful analysis of trust instruments, beneficiary interests and the facts that give rise to modification requests. We work to identify practical solutions for clients who wish to amend trust terms cooperatively as well as those who must seek relief through the court. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, thorough document review and thoughtful planning to align the modified trust with the grantor’s objectives while minimizing conflict and administrative burdens.
A trust modification petition is a legal request to change the terms or enforceability of an existing trust. In California, modifications can sometimes be achieved by the parties’ agreement when all interested persons consent and state law permits, but in other situations a petition to the probate court is necessary to address ambiguity, mistake, changed circumstances, or incapacity issues. The petition process involves filing papers with the court, providing notice to beneficiaries and interested parties, and presenting evidence supporting the requested change. The court reviews whether the modification is consistent with legal standards and equitable considerations before issuing an order.
Different issues prompt petitions: clarifying ambiguous language, correcting scrivener’s errors, addressing changed family dynamics, or responding to unforeseen tax or property consequences. The petitioner must show the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s intent or is justified by changed circumstances such that enforcement of the original terms is no longer practical or equitable. The court balances the trust maker’s intent with applicable statutes and the rights of beneficiaries. Understanding the legal threshold and preparing appropriate documentation can influence the likelihood of a successful petition and reduce delay.
A trust modification petition asks the probate court to alter the terms or administration of a trust when informal amendment is not possible or adequate. Petitioners may request modifications to reflect the settlor’s intent more accurately, to correct mistakes or omissions, or to adapt to new circumstances such as divorce, remarriage, changes in a beneficiary’s needs, or altered tax law. The petition must describe the proposed changes, explain why they are needed, and identify interested parties. Courts will review evidence, including the trust document, declarations, and sometimes witness testimony, to determine whether to grant the relief sought.
The process begins with a careful document review to determine whether the trust instrument allows amendment by the settlor or through agreement among beneficiaries. If a court petition is required, the next steps include drafting the petition, identifying and notifying interested parties, and supporting the request with declarations and documentary evidence. The court may hold hearings to evaluate contested issues. Key elements include demonstrating the basis for modification, providing clear proposed language, and addressing potential impacts on beneficiaries and creditors. Attention to procedure and notice requirements helps avoid delays and ensure an orderly resolution.
Understanding common terms helps trustees, beneficiaries and petitioners navigate the process. Definitions often cover settlor, trustee, beneficiary, pour-over will, Heggstad petition, fee simple versus trust ownership, and concepts such as revocable versus irrevocable trusts. Clarity on these terms informs decisions about whether to petition the court or to pursue alternative dispute resolution. A glossary provides plain-language explanations so parties can better comprehend notices, petitions and court orders, and so discussions with counsel are more productive when planning modifications or responding to a petition.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and set its terms and beneficiaries. This individual’s expressed intent, as reflected in the trust instrument and in surrounding circumstances, guides decisions about proposed modifications. When the settlor is alive and has retained amendment powers, the trust may be changed without court intervention. If the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, interested parties may need to demonstrate to the court that a modification aligns with the original intent or responds to circumstances the settlor could not have foreseen. The settlor’s documented wishes are central to any petition.
The trustee is the individual or institution responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out distributions according to the trust terms. Trustees owe duties of loyalty and prudence to beneficiaries and must follow the trust document unless a court orders otherwise. In modification matters, a trustee may be a petitioner, a party that must be notified, or a party whose powers are at issue. Trustees may seek court guidance when facing ambiguity or conflicting beneficiary claims, and courts will consider the trustee’s duties and proposed modifications to ensure proper administration going forward.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits from the trust, which can include income, principal or other rights specified by the trust instrument. Beneficiaries may support or oppose a proposed modification depending on how it affects their interests. California law requires that interested persons receive notice of petitions that could impact their entitlements. When disputes arise, the court considers the impact on beneficiaries and whether the proposed changes respect the settlor’s intent and fairness among beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition seeks to establish that certain property that was not formally transferred into a trust should nonetheless be treated as trust property because the settlor intended to transfer it. This type of claim often arises when assets were overseen in trust accounting or when the settlor believed assets had been transferred but formal title remained in their name. The petition asks the court to recognize trust ownership consistent with the settlor’s intent, so assets are administered according to the trust terms rather than under probate rules.
When addressing issues with a trust, parties generally consider informal amendment by the settlor, agreement among interested persons, mediation or negotiation, and filing a court petition. Informal amendment is simplest when the settlor retains amendment rights. Agreements among beneficiaries may be effective where all parties consent and the trust permits. Mediation can resolve disputes without litigation. Court petitions become necessary when parties disagree, the settlor is incapacitated or the trust is ambiguous. Each option has tradeoffs in cost, time and finality, and selecting the right path depends on case-specific facts.
When the settlor is alive and retains explicit authority to amend or revoke the trust, a court petition often can be avoided. In those circumstances, the settlor can execute an amendment consistent with the trust instrument’s amendment clause, update beneficiary designations, or replace trustees as needed. Taking a nonjudicial approach reduces cost and preserves privacy. It remains important to follow formal amendment procedures set by the trust and to notify relevant parties as appropriate, so that transfers, title changes and beneficiary expectations are properly documented and enforced during trust administration.
If all beneficiaries and the trustee agree to changes and the trust permits modifications by unanimous consent, parties may amend the trust without court involvement. This approach can be efficient and preserve family relationships when interests align. Agreements should be reduced to written amendments signed according to the trust’s formalities and should address successor trustee designations and any tax consequences. Even with agreement, it is prudent to document the rationale and consider whether third-party interests, creditors or other potential claimants might later challenge the amendment.
When beneficiaries or trustees disagree about the meaning or administration of trust terms, a court petition may be necessary to resolve conflicting interpretations and prevent improper distributions. Litigation helps produce a binding decision that clarifies rights and responsibilities, protects fiduciary duties, and can settle claims that might otherwise produce prolonged disputes. Thorough legal representation helps present the relevant evidence and legal arguments to the court while also exploring settlement opportunities to limit cost and delay.
If the settlor is incapacitated or has died and the trust language is unclear or contains mistakes, a petition allows the court to determine the proper interpretation and appropriate remedy. Evidence such as prior drafts, correspondence, and witness testimony may be used to show the settlor’s intent. The court can issue orders to correct scrivener’s errors, reform the trust, or rearrange administrative procedures to align with that intent. This path protects beneficiary rights and provides authoritative direction for trustees managing the estate.
A comprehensive approach that includes a carefully prepared petition and full documentation reduces the risk of future litigation by creating a clear, court-ordered record of the modified terms. It can protect trustees who follow court instructions, provide certainty to beneficiaries, and resolve competing claims that could otherwise lead to asset depletion. While the process involves costs and procedure, the finality obtained from a court order often prevents repetitive disputes and clarifies administration for successors and financial institutions charged with carrying out distributions.
Additionally, a court-administered modification may help preserve tax attributes of trusts and confirm alternate distribution mechanisms that align with long-term planning. When changes affect retirement accounts, life insurance or other sensitive assets, careful legal review ensures compliance with tax rules and creditor considerations. The structured court process also provides protections for vulnerable beneficiaries or those with special needs, ensuring that courts evaluate the impact of changes and approve modifications that serve the trust’s lawful purpose and mitigate the risk of future challenges.
One principal benefit of pursuing a formal modification through the courts is that the resulting order is binding and enforceable, reducing ambiguity and the potential for subsequent disputes. When the court issues an order approving or reforming a trust, trustees and beneficiaries receive clear directives on administration, distributions and fiduciary duties. This finality supports stable management of trust assets and provides assurance to financial institutions, title companies and successor trustees that the modified terms are valid under California law.
A court-ordered modification protects trustees who rely on the court’s ruling to carry out their duties without fear of later personal liability. It also safeguards beneficiaries by ensuring that changes have been considered under legal standards and that necessary notices and procedures were followed. Where vulnerable beneficiaries or third-party creditors might otherwise object, a judicial process brings impartial review and documentation that balances competing interests, which helps maintain trust integrity and reduces the chance of future litigation.
Gather all documents and communications that reflect the settlor’s intent and the trust’s history before filing any petition. This includes prior drafts, emails, letters, financial statements, deeds, and records of conversations that can show why a modification is needed. Clear documentation supports declarations filed with the court and helps clarify ambiguous provisions, making it easier to persuade the court that the proposed change reflects the settlor’s wishes or is justified by changed circumstances. Organized records also speed up the process and reduce the chance of surprise objections.
Before escalating to a contested court hearing, explore mediation or settlement discussions to resolve disputes over trust terms. Mediation can provide a private forum for parties to negotiate compromises that respect the settlor’s intent while addressing beneficiaries’ concerns. Even when a petition is necessary, demonstrating that parties attempted negotiation may help streamline court proceedings. ADR can be less adversarial and more cost-effective, and it encourages solutions tailored to the family’s goals while preserving the option of court involvement if discussions fail.
Clients consider a trust modification petition for many reasons, including ambiguous language in the trust, mistakes in drafting, changes in family relationships, or the need to correct title issues that prevent proper administration. A petition can also address practical complications like moved assets, outdated distribution schemes, or unforeseen taxation concerns. When left unaddressed, these issues can delay administration, trigger disputes, and reduce the value of the estate. Seeking a petition can restore clarity, facilitate administration and align the trust with the settlor’s intended outcomes.
Other common reasons include protecting vulnerable beneficiaries, updating successor trustee provisions, or resolving conflicts over asset ownership that hinder transfer to trust beneficiaries. A petition may also be necessary to address issues involving retirement accounts, real property deeds, or life insurance designations that were overlooked. By addressing these matters proactively, petitioners can secure a durable court order that directs trustees and financial institutions on proper handling and distribution, limiting the potential for later disputes and legal expense.
Situations that often require a trust modification petition include contradictory provisions within the trust, a settlor’s lost amendment documents, property not properly transferred into the trust, or beneficiaries whose circumstances change significantly. Family events such as divorce, remarriage, or the birth of new descendants can also make existing terms impractical. Additionally, discovery of drafting errors or omissions that materially affect distributions frequently prompts petitioners to seek judicial relief to correct and clarify the trust’s provisions for all interested parties.
When a trust contains ambiguous language or conflicting instructions, trustees and beneficiaries may disagree about interpretation, which can stall administration. In these circumstances, a petition asks the court to interpret the trust and, if appropriate, reform the document to reflect what the settlor intended. Presenting evidence such as drafts, correspondence and surrounding circumstances helps the court determine the proper construction. Clearing up ambiguity through a judicial order enables trustees to act with confidence and prevents inconsistent distributions that could lead to later litigation.
When property believed to be in the trust remains titled in the settlor’s name, administration problems can arise at incapacity or death. A Heggstad petition or similar court proceeding may establish that the settlor intended the property to be trust property despite a lapse in formal transfer. Resolving title issues through a petition prevents assets from passing through probate and ensures they are administered according to the trust terms. Properly documenting the settlor’s intent and the circumstances of the transfer is essential to succeed with this approach.
Life changes such as divorce, remarriage, the birth of grandchildren, changed health needs, or substantial shifts in the estate’s assets can make original trust provisions inappropriate. When the trust no longer reflects the grantor’s goals or fails to meet the current needs of beneficiaries, a modification petition can adjust distributions, add or remove beneficiaries, or reallocate trustee powers. Courts will evaluate whether the proposed changes are consistent with the settlor’s intent and whether the modification protects the trust’s purpose without unfairly harming other parties.
If you face issues related to a trust in Blackhawk or the surrounding Contra Costa County area, our office provides focused counsel to explain options, prepare necessary petitions, and represent clients in court when required. We assist trustees, beneficiaries and interested parties with petitions to reform or modify trusts, Heggstad matters, and related title or administration issues. Our goal is to move forward efficiently while keeping clients informed of procedural requirements, possible outcomes and practical considerations so they can make decisions that protect estate assets and honor the trust maker’s intended distribution plan.
Our practice emphasizes careful review of trust documents and the surrounding facts to identify the most effective route for resolving trust problems. We focus on practical solutions that preserve assets, respect the settlor’s intent, and reduce conflict among beneficiaries. Whether the matter may be resolved by agreement or requires a petition, we prepare comprehensive filings, coordinate required notices, and represent clients at hearings. A thoughtful approach to documentation and negotiation often leads to efficient outcomes and preserves estate value for intended beneficiaries.
We also assist clients in related matters such as preparing pour-over wills, updating powers of attorney, addressing HIPAA authorizations, and resolving title issues that affect trust administration. Our familiarity with estate planning documents like revocable living trusts, irrevocable life insurance trusts, retirement plan trusts and special needs trusts helps us anticipate downstream effects of proposed changes. This breadth of experience with estate planning instruments allows us to address complex interactions and suggest modifications that support long-term planning goals.
Clients receive clear guidance about process timelines, likely evidence requirements, and practical steps to reduce friction among parties. We work to secure timely court review when necessary, and we pursue negotiated resolutions where possible to limit cost and preserve relationships. Throughout the engagement, our office emphasizes transparent communication about fees, strategy and possible outcomes so clients can make informed choices about whether to pursue a petition, mediation, or a nonjudicial amendment.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to review the trust document, related estate planning instruments and the facts prompting a modification. We identify legal standards that apply, evaluate whether a nonjudicial amendment or agreement is feasible, and, if needed, prepare a petition supported by declarations and documentary evidence. We handle notices, file necessary court papers, and represent clients at hearings. Throughout the matter we keep clients informed about strategy options, likely timelines and potential costs, striving to achieve a resolution that aligns with the settlor’s intent and protects beneficiary interests.
The first step is an exhaustive review of the trust instrument, related estate planning documents, deeds, beneficiary designations and any communications that reflect the settlor’s intent. This review determines whether the trust includes an amendment clause, whether all necessary parties can consent to a change, and whether formal judicial relief may be necessary. A thorough factual investigation helps identify potential challenges, title issues and third-party consequences, and it forms the foundation for a persuasive petition if court action proves the best path forward.
We collect and analyze documents such as the original trust, amendments, deeds, account statements, previous wills, and any written communications reflecting the settlor’s intent. If assets are believed to be in trust but titled otherwise, we gather property records and supporting evidence. Witness statements and contemporaneous drafts can be important in proving intent or showing scrivener’s errors. Meticulous document collection increases the likelihood of a clear resolution and helps prepare strong support for any petition or negotiation.
We determine who must be notified under California probate rules, including beneficiaries, trustees, heirs and potential creditors, and we prepare required notices to comply with statutory timelines. Proper service is essential to avoid procedural defects that could delay or invalidate the petition. Early identification and notification also help prepare for potential objections and allow the opportunity for informal resolution. Clear, documented notice practices are critical in ensuring the court will proceed on the merits of the petition without procedural objections.
If court intervention is necessary, we prepare a petition that sets forth the factual and legal basis for the requested modification, proposed revised language, and supporting declarations and exhibits. The petition outlines the necessity for modification, the identities of interested parties, and the proposed order for the court to enter. We double-check procedural requirements, file the petition, and arrange for service of the petition and notices. Accurate and persuasive pleadings increase the likelihood of favorable consideration by the court and help focus resolution efforts.
Supporting declarations provide narrative context for the court, describing the settlor’s intent, facts that support reform or modification, and documentary evidence such as drafts, deeds, or correspondence. Exhibits are organized to make the court’s review efficient and to demonstrate the reasonableness of the proposed change. Well-prepared declarations anticipate likely questions, address potential objections, and clearly explain why the requested relief aligns with the trust maker’s goals or corrects an identified problem.
After filing, we arrange formal service on all required parties and monitor for any responses or objections. If objections are filed, we evaluate whether settlement discussions, mediation or contested hearings are appropriate. We prepare responsive pleadings and evidence as needed to address objections and advocate for the petition on legal and equitable grounds. Maintaining responsiveness and thorough documentation helps the court resolve disputes efficiently and protects clients’ positions throughout litigation or settlement efforts.
If the petition proceeds to hearing, we present the case to the court with testimony and documentary evidence, address objections, and seek an order that implements the agreed or requested changes. When the court issues an order, we assist with implementing the modifications, including preparing amended trust documents, updating asset titles, advising trustees and coordinating with financial institutions to ensure distributions follow the new terms. Follow-through is essential to complete the transition and prevent future disputes about administration.
At the hearing, we explain the factual basis for the modification, answer the court’s inquiries, and demonstrate how the proposed changes reflect the settlor’s intent or are otherwise equitable. Evidence is presented through witness declarations or testimony and supporting documents. We emphasize clarity and legal standards that justify relief. Effective courtroom presentation helps the judge understand the reasons for the modification and the practical implications for beneficiaries and trustees, which supports a reasoned judicial decision.
Once the court issues an order, we prepare revised trust documents and coordinate title transfers, beneficiary designation updates, and notifications to financial institutions to reflect the new terms. We advise trustees on steps to comply with the order and on recordkeeping to demonstrate adherence to the modified trust. Proper implementation prevents administrative missteps and ensures that the court’s directives become the operative framework for trust administration moving forward.
A trust modification petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to change, interpret or reform the terms of an existing trust when informal amendment is not feasible. People consider filing when the trust contains ambiguous language, when there are mistakes that affect distributions, or when unforeseen changes in family or financial circumstances make the original terms impractical. The petition must explain why the modification is necessary, propose specific changes, and identify interested parties so the court can evaluate the merits of the request and issue an appropriate order. Before filing, it is often advisable to explore whether the settlor can amend the trust directly or whether all beneficiaries can agree to a nonjudicial amendment. When that is not possible, a petition provides a formal path to obtain binding resolution. The court will require evidence supporting the requested change, and successful petitions typically include clear documentation and persuasive declarations demonstrating the need for modification.
Yes, trustees or beneficiaries can sometimes petition the court to modify a trust even without the settlor’s consent, particularly when the settlor is incapacitated or deceased and the trust language is defective or ambiguous. California law permits certain petitions when it is shown that modification is necessary to carry out the settlor’s intent or to address changed circumstances that render the original terms impractical. The court will examine whether the requested relief is consistent with the trust’s purpose and the settlor’s probable intent. However, the court typically prefers solutions that respect the settlor’s expressed wishes, so petitioners must present convincing evidence. Interested parties must be notified and given an opportunity to object, and the judge will balance equitable considerations and the rights of beneficiaries when deciding whether to grant the requested modification.
Supporting evidence often includes the original trust and any amendments, drafts or correspondence that reflect the settlor’s intent, deeds and title documents for trust assets, financial statements, and declarations from witnesses who can speak to the settlor’s intentions. Contemporary notes or communications describing the trust maker’s wishes can be persuasive, as can records showing how assets were intended to be handled. In Heggstad matters, property records and proof of intent to transfer assets into the trust are especially important. The strength and organization of documentary evidence can significantly affect the court’s view. Professional declarations that explain the context, timeline and facts surrounding the trust’s drafting and administration help the judge understand why the modification is necessary and reasonable, increasing the likelihood of a favorable ruling.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on case complexity, notice and service requirements, whether objections are filed, and the court’s schedule. An uncontested matter that proceeds smoothly can be resolved in a few months, while contested petitions may take considerably longer due to discovery, hearings and briefing. Additional delays can arise if title issues or third-party claims must be resolved before a court can grant relief. Efforts to resolve disputes through negotiation or mediation can shorten the timeline, and careful preparation of the petition and supporting documents can prevent procedural setbacks. Discussing expected timelines with counsel at the outset helps set realistic expectations and plan for interim administration steps while the petition proceeds.
Filing a trust modification petition requires court filings and service on interested parties, which may result in some information becoming part of the public record. Probate court proceedings are generally public, and filed documents can be accessed unless the court seals records for specific reasons. If privacy is a high priority, parties should explore whether nonjudicial amendment or confidential settlement agreements can achieve the desired outcome without public filings. When court involvement is unavoidable, counsel can help limit unnecessary disclosure by focusing filings on relevant issues and, where possible, requesting protective orders or redacting sensitive details. Understanding the degree of public exposure and planning accordingly helps clients weigh the benefits of judicial resolution against privacy concerns.
Yes, a Heggstad petition, which asks the court to recognize property as trust property despite improper titling, can often be filed alongside or as part of a broader trust modification petition. Combining these claims can be efficient when the same facts and evidence support both the establishment of trust ownership and the request to modify trust terms. Courts will consider the totality of evidence to decide whether property should be treated as part of the trust and whether the trust should be reformed or modified accordingly. Coordinating related petitions requires careful pleading and clear presentation of how title issues affect the trust’s administration and the requested changes. Properly organized filings and comprehensive evidence increase the chances of resolving both ownership and modification issues in a single proceeding, reducing duplication and overall cost.
Costs associated with a trust modification petition vary widely depending on the complexity of the matter, the number of interested parties, whether objections are raised, and how much litigation or discovery is necessary. Basic uncontested petitions that proceed smoothly will cost less than contested matters requiring hearings, depositions, or expert testimony. Court filing fees and service costs are additional considerations. Discussing fee structures, anticipated tasks and potential out-of-pocket expenses with counsel helps create a budget and plan for the matter. Where disputes are likely, alternative dispute resolution may offer a more cost-effective path. Many matters benefit from negotiation or mediation to substantially reduce legal fees and time compared to full contested litigation. Early case assessment and clear communication about costs can help clients choose the most appropriate and affordable approach.
Beneficiaries and other interested parties must be notified according to California probate rules, which specify who is entitled to receive notice and the method of service. Notices typically explain the nature of the petition, the relief requested, and how recipients may respond or appear in court. Proper and timely service is essential to avoid procedural defects and to give parties a fair opportunity to participate, object, or propose alternatives that may resolve the matter without a contested hearing. Counsel assists with preparing and delivering required notices, tracking service proofs, and addressing any procedural challenges. Clear communication with beneficiaries early in the process can also reduce misunderstanding and help identify potential areas for agreement before litigation advances.
If a beneficiary objects to a proposed modification, the court will consider the objection in evaluating whether to grant the petition. Objections can raise factual disputes about the settlor’s intent, challenge the adequacy of notice, or assert that the requested change unfairly harms a beneficiary’s rights. When objections arise, the matter may proceed to contested hearings, and parties may exchange evidence or engage in discovery to support their positions. The court will balance the evidence and applicable law when deciding whether to approve the modification. Many objections are resolved through negotiation or mediation before the court reaches a decision. Even when a hearing is necessary, carefully crafted evidence and focused legal arguments can address objections efficiently. Engaging experienced counsel early helps identify potential objections and develop strategies to resolve them with minimal disruption.
To minimize family conflict when seeking a trust modification, prioritize clear communication, transparency and early notification of interested parties. Sharing the reasons for the proposed change and providing supporting documentation can help beneficiaries understand the need for modification. When feasible, explore negotiated agreements or mediation before initiating formal court proceedings; these approaches are often less adversarial and can preserve relationships while achieving practical solutions that meet the trust maker’s objectives. Documenting the rationale for changes and working with neutral facilitators can reduce misunderstandings and foster cooperative problem solving. Where court action becomes necessary, preparing thorough, well-supported filings and demonstrating efforts to resolve matters amicably can also mitigate perceptions of unfairness and help the court view the petition in a constructive light.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas