A trust modification petition can be the right path when changing circumstances make an existing trust no longer align with your wishes or needs. In Danville and the wider Contra Costa County area, families and trustees often seek adjustments to trust terms to update beneficiary designations, clarify distribution timing, or address changes in property holdings. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with thoughtful review of trust documents and guidance through the petition process so trustees and interested parties understand potential impacts, timelines, and legal requirements under California law.
Trust modification matters can involve nuanced legal standards, court filings, and coordination among trustees, beneficiaries, and other parties. Whether you are a trustee seeking authority to modify administrative provisions, a beneficiary concerned about proposed amendments, or a settlor seeking to adjust trust provisions while capacity allows, it helps to have clear information about procedural steps and potential outcomes. Our firm provides straightforward explanations of options like nonjudicial settlement agreements, judicial petitions, and settlement approaches that aim to resolve disputes while protecting fiduciary duties and the settlor’s intent.
Pursuing a trust modification petition offers several important benefits for trustees, beneficiaries, and settlors who face changed circumstances. Modifications allow for correction of drafting errors, adaptation to new family dynamics, or alignment of trust terms with current tax rules and asset ownership. A well-managed petition can preserve the settlor’s overarching intent while avoiding future disputes by clarifying ambiguous provisions. Handling the petition through appropriate legal channels also helps ensure that trustees act within their authority, beneficiaries receive notice, and any court approvals reflect adherence to California trust law and fiduciary duties.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California from our San Jose base and assists Danville residents with estate planning and trust administration matters. We focus on delivering clear, practical legal guidance for trust modification petitions, working with trustees and beneficiaries to review documents, evaluate options, and prepare filings when court intervention is necessary. Our approach emphasizes careful analysis of trust language, proactive communication among interested parties, and managing timelines and procedural requirements so clients can make informed decisions that protect family interests and adhere to California law.
A trust modification petition is a legal request submitted to a court to change one or more terms of an existing trust when nonjudicial methods are unavailable or contested. Reasons for seeking a petition include correcting drafting errors, adjusting to changed beneficiary circumstances, resolving ambiguities, or obtaining court approval for actions outside the trustee’s stated powers. California law provides specific rules for petitions, notice requirements for beneficiaries, and standards for judicial modification. Knowing when a petition is necessary and what proof the court will require helps trustees and beneficiaries plan an effective strategy.
Before filing a petition, parties often explore alternatives such as signed agreements among beneficiaries, trustee actions within authority, or trustee-initiated conservatorship steps if capacity is at issue. When those options fail or are not applicable, a judicial petition clarifies rights, confirms trustee powers, or authorizes specific changes consistent with the settlor’s intent and public policy. The court evaluates requests in light of the trust document, testimony, and any evidence of changed circumstances or mistakes. Preparing a complete petition with supporting evidence and clear legal arguments increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
A trust modification petition asks the probate or superior court to alter trust terms, grant instructions to trustees, or resolve disputes between beneficiaries and fiduciaries. Typical filings include petitions to modify due to mistake or changed circumstances, petitions to reform trust provisions to match the settlor’s intent, and petitions seeking directions on administration. The process usually requires providing notice to beneficiaries and interested parties, submitting declarations or evidence supporting the requested change, and sometimes holding a hearing. The court then decides whether the modification best serves the trust’s purpose and complies with legal standards.
Key elements of a trust modification petition include identifying the precise language to be changed, documenting the changed circumstances or mistake, preparing declarations from interested parties or witnesses, and complying with service and notice rules for beneficiaries. The process may involve court motions, proposed orders, mediation efforts, and hearings. Trustees must also demonstrate that any requested change respects fiduciary duties and the settlor’s probable intent. Effective petitions clearly state relief requested, include documentary support, and outline how the requested modification preserves the trust’s overall purpose while remedying an identified problem.
This glossary covers the core terms used in trust modification matters so trustees and beneficiaries can navigate filings and communications confidently. Clear definitions help set expectations for court procedures, evidentiary standards, and roles such as settlor, trustee, and beneficiary. Understanding these terms allows parties to recognize when a petition is needed, the nature of relief a court may grant, and how different options affect administration and distributions. Familiarity with commonly used phrases also aids in discussions with counsel and during settlement negotiations.
Trust modification refers to any change in the terms, provisions, or administration of an existing trust. Modifications can occur nonjudicially when all parties agree and the trust terms permit, or judicially when a court is asked to authorize a change because parties disagree or certain statutory conditions exist. Court-ordered modifications address mistakes, changed circumstances, unanticipated tax consequences, or other issues that prevent the trust from fulfilling the settlor’s intent. The goal of modification is to align the trust with current realities while respecting the foundational purposes the settlor established.
A petition to reform a trust seeks judicial correction of trust language that does not accurately reflect the settlor’s intent, often due to drafting errors, ambiguity, or clerical mistakes. Reform petitions present evidence such as contemporaneous documents, communications, or testimony showing what the settlor intended. The court reviews that evidence and may modify or reform the trust instrument to match the established intent, provided the change aligns with law and does not contravene public policy. Successful petitions resolve ongoing uncertainties and promote proper administration.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and established its terms and objectives, while the trustee is the person or entity charged with managing trust assets and carrying out the settlor’s directions. Trustees must act in the best interests of beneficiaries and within the authority granted by the trust and state law. When modification is sought, the settlor’s intent is central to the court’s review, and the trustee’s actions or requests must be supported by facts demonstrating that proposed changes are consistent with that intent and with fiduciary duties.
A beneficiary is an individual or entity designated to receive benefits or distributions from a trust, and an interested party includes any person with a legal or financial stake in the trust, such as heirs, creditors with claims, and trustees. Notices for petitions must generally be provided to beneficiaries and other interested parties so they can respond or object. Courts consider the rights and objections of these parties when approving modifications, aiming to balance the settlor’s intent with the protection of those who rely on the trust for distributions or other benefits.
When contemplated trust changes arise, parties can often choose between negotiated, nonjudicial agreements and formal judicial petitions. Nonjudicial approaches involve consensus among all beneficiaries and trustees and can be quicker and less costly, but they require full cooperation and clear authority in the trust instrument. Judicial petitions are appropriate when parties disagree, when notice requirements cannot be met informally, or when a court’s binding decision is necessary. Each option carries tradeoffs in terms of cost, timing, confidentiality, and enforceability, so selecting the right path depends on the nature of the dispute and the goals of the parties.
A limited, nonjudicial approach can be sufficient when all beneficiaries and trustees agree on the proposed changes and the trust instrument permits modification without court involvement. In such cases parties can draft a written settlement or amendment that documents the agreed changes and includes sworn statements where appropriate. This approach avoids court fees and public filings, and can be completed relatively quickly. It also preserves privacy and reduces the potential for contentious litigation, provided the agreement is thorough and legally enforceable under California law.
Limited approaches are often suitable for minor administrative adjustments like updating contact information, clarifying distribution timing, or correcting a typographical error that all parties recognize and accept. When changes do not affect beneficiaries’ substantive rights or the fundamental purpose of the trust, parties can document the adjustment and proceed without court intervention. Such resolutions require clear written consent and careful record-keeping so future trustees and beneficiaries understand the basis for the change and so trust records remain consistent and defensible if questions arise later.
Comprehensive legal service is often needed when beneficiaries dispute proposed changes or when the settlor’s intent is unclear and a court determination is necessary. In these situations, a judicial petition clarifies legal rights, resolves competing claims, and provides an enforceable court order specifying required actions. The court reviews evidence, hears objections, and applies state law to determine whether reformation or modification is warranted. Engaging legal counsel early helps prepare the record, manage communications among parties, and present the strongest possible basis for the requested relief.
A broader legal approach is necessary when modifications implicate complex asset structures, tax consequences, or creditor claims that could alter distributions significantly. Court oversight helps ensure that proposed changes comply with tax rules and protect beneficiaries from unintended liabilities. Trustees must provide thorough documentation about assets, valuations, and potential tax effects. Working with legal counsel and other professionals enables the trust to be modified in a way that preserves value and avoids creating exposure for trustees or beneficiaries while meeting the settlor’s expressed purposes.
A comprehensive, court-supported approach to trust modification provides clear, binding resolutions that reduce the risk of future disputes or challenges. When the court reviews the facts and issues an order, that decision provides finality and enforceability for trustees and beneficiaries. This process also ensures that modifications are consistent with applicable statutes and fiduciary obligations, offers a transparent record of the decision, and protects trustees who follow the court’s instructions. For families facing contested changes, court approval can preserve family relationships by resolving matters in a structured legal forum.
Additionally, the court process can produce detailed findings that clarify ambiguous provisions, which helps future trustees administer the trust confidently. Court rulings may also address ancillary matters, such as authority to sell assets or settle claims, which streamlines subsequent administration. Although litigation may involve more time and cost than nonjudicial alternatives, the certainty and protective benefits of a judicial decision often outweigh those drawbacks when significant assets, complex issues, or competing interests are at stake.
One key benefit of a comprehensive approach is finality: a court order resolving a petition provides an enforceable resolution that reduces the chance of future litigation over the same issues. That enforceability protects trustees who act pursuant to the order and gives beneficiaries certainty about distributions and administration. Courts balance the settlor’s intent with statutory requirements and the rights of interested parties, producing decisions that stand as definitive guidance. For families prioritizing long-term clarity and stability, that finality is a significant advantage.
A comprehensive judicial resolution clarifies trustee duties, beneficiary rights, and permissible administrative actions, which helps prevent missteps that could lead to liability. Clear court findings define the scope of trustee authority, outline distribution parameters, and address how assets should be handled going forward. This clarity is particularly valuable when dealing with blended families, shifting asset composition, or legacy plans that span multiple generations. With defined roles and obligations, trustees can proceed with administration in a way that minimizes disputes and protects the trust’s purpose.
When contemplating a trust modification, assemble written records that explain why the change is needed, such as updated beneficiary circumstances, asset transfers, or drafting errors. Clear documentation may include correspondence, financial records, or contemporaneous notes that reflect the settlor’s intent or changed circumstances. Well-organized evidence helps support a petition or streamline nonjudicial agreements, and it reduces the time spent collecting proof after concerns arise. Maintaining detailed records also helps trustees demonstrate that proposed changes are reasonable and responsible under fiduciary duties.
Mediation or facilitated negotiation can be a useful step before initiating a formal petition, particularly when relationships among beneficiaries are strained but not irreparably broken. Mediation provides a confidential forum to explore compromises, allocate risks, and draft settlement agreements that resolve disputes without public court filings. When mediation succeeds, parties save time and cost and maintain privacy. If mediation does not yield agreement, the process still helps clarify issues for the court and can narrow the matters requiring judicial attention, streamlining any subsequent petition.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust document contains errors that prevent proper administration, when beneficiaries disagree on interpretation, or when changed circumstances make original provisions impractical. Other reasons include addressing unintended tax consequences, aligning distributions with current family dynamics, or resolving conflicts that hinder trustees from carrying out duties. A court petition provides a formal avenue to correct documents and obtain binding orders, reducing ambiguity and protecting the trust’s purpose over time. We help clients assess whether a petition is the best path forward based on facts and objectives.
Filing a petition may also be appropriate if property has been moved into or out of the trust in ways not anticipated by the settlor, or if a trustee seeks direction before taking significant actions like selling property or settling claims. When there are competing claims from creditors or multiple beneficiaries with conflicting interests, court involvement can produce a controlled resolution. In each case the decision to seek judicial modification should weigh the benefits of finality and enforceability against the time and cost involved in litigation.
Common circumstances prompting petitions include ambiguous trust language that creates disagreement about distributions, discovered drafting errors that contradict the settlor’s intent, and significant life changes such as divorce, remarriage, or death of a beneficiary. Other triggers are changes in asset ownership, new tax laws that affect trust outcomes, or the need to grant trustees specific authority not expressly provided in the trust document. Recognizing these circumstances early allows trustees and beneficiaries to explore the right corrective path and avoid prolonged uncertainty.
Ambiguities or conflicting provisions in trust documents frequently lead to disputes and may require judicial reform or clarification. When language can reasonably be interpreted in more than one way, beneficiaries or trustees may disagree on distribution timing, residue allocation, or powers granted to fiduciaries. A petition to reform or interpret the trust presents evidence of the settlor’s intent and asks the court to resolve the inconsistency. Clarifying ambiguous clauses prevents ongoing administration problems and reduces the risk of contested actions by trustees or disgruntled beneficiaries.
Drafting mistakes or omissions, such as incorrect legal descriptions, missing signature pages, or outdated beneficiary designations, often necessitate corrective action. These mistakes can create gaps that interfere with asset distribution or trustee authority. A petition can request reformation to reflect the intended terms or seek judicial instructions for how to handle the issue. Correcting such errors ensures that distributions align with the settlor’s wishes and helps trustees act confidently in administering the trust.
Significant life events, including divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, and changes in the value or composition of assets, can make existing trust terms impractical or undesired. When these shifts affect who should benefit or how assets should be managed, a modification may be warranted. Petitioning the court provides a path to adjust terms in a way that reflects new realities while maintaining the trust’s fundamental purpose. Timely action helps prevent disputes and ensures that the trust continues to serve its intended beneficiaries effectively.
If you are facing a trust modification issue in Danville or Contra Costa County, our firm provides practical assistance from initial review through petition preparation or settlement negotiation. We explain legal options, draft necessary documents, prepare notices, and represent clients in court when judicial approval is needed. Our goal is to help trustees and beneficiaries achieve clear resolutions that protect the settlor’s intentions and minimize future disputes. We also coordinate with financial professionals to address valuation, tax, or asset transfer matters as part of a comprehensive approach.
Clients choose our firm for thoughtful guidance through trust modification matters because we focus on clear communication, careful preparation, and practical outcomes. We take time to understand the trust instrument, the family dynamics involved, and the specific changes being sought. That foundation allows us to recommend whether nonjudicial resolution is feasible or whether a judicial petition is necessary, and to prepare filings and evidence designed to support the requested relief. Our approach emphasizes minimizing conflict while protecting legal rights and fiduciary responsibilities.
We also prioritize transparency about process, timelines, and likely costs so clients know what to expect at each stage. When negotiations can resolve issues, we facilitate agreements that document modifications clearly and legally. When a petition is the appropriate path, we prepare comprehensive submissions that comply with notice requirements and present the strongest factual and legal case available. Our practice includes coordinating with accountants or appraisers when asset complexity or tax considerations are relevant to the requested modification.
Finally, our firm ensures attention to procedural details that matter in trust matters, including filing deadlines, service of process, and proposed orders for judicial review. Trustees and beneficiaries benefit from a consistent process that seeks efficient resolution while maintaining respect for the settlor’s intentions and the rights of interested parties. We help clients weigh the benefits of settlement, mediation, and court proceedings so they choose the path that best protects family and financial interests.
Our process for trust modification matters begins with a detailed review of the trust document and a consultation to understand the parties’ concerns and objectives. We then evaluate alternatives such as nonjudicial settlement agreements and only recommend a petition when necessary. If a petition is appropriate we prepare all required pleadings, coordinate notices to beneficiaries and interested parties, gather supporting evidence, and file the petition with the proper court. We keep clients informed at each step and aim to resolve matters efficiently through negotiation or, if needed, courtroom representation.
The first step is a careful review of the trust instrument, related estate planning documents, and relevant facts about the parties and assets. This assessment identifies ambiguities, drafting errors, and potential legal bases for modification. It also determines whether nonjudicial solutions are viable. We collect necessary documents, outline possible strategies, and advise on risks and expected outcomes. A clear assessment helps set realistic goals and informs whether mediation, negotiation, or a judicial petition is the most appropriate path forward.
Document review includes the trust instrument, related wills, powers of attorney, deeds, and beneficiary designations. We also gather evidence that supports the requested change, such as correspondence, financial records, and witness statements. This evidence is organized to present a coherent narrative showing the need for modification and the settlor’s probable intent. Proper preparation reduces surprises later in the process and helps frame the legal arguments needed for judicial consideration if a petition becomes necessary.
Identifying all beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties is essential because California law requires notice so affected persons can respond to a petition. We compile a comprehensive list of interested parties, confirm contact information, and prepare legally compliant notices. Proper service of notice helps preserve procedural rights, prevents delays, and supports fairness in the process. When some parties cannot be located, we discuss alternative service methods to ensure the petition proceeds appropriately under court rules.
If a petition is necessary, we prepare and file the petition with the appropriate superior court, attaching declarations, exhibits, proposed orders, and proof of service. The petition explains the legal and factual basis for the requested modification, outlines relief sought, and provides evidence supporting reform or clarification. After filing, the court schedules hearings and interested parties may file responses or objections. We handle procedural motions, attend hearings, and work to resolve contested issues through negotiation or court rulings as appropriate.
Support for a petition often includes sworn declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or witnesses, as well as documentary exhibits like correspondence and financial records. These materials establish the factual basis for modification and demonstrate how the requested change aligns with the settlor’s probable intent. We draft and review declarations carefully to ensure clarity, relevance, and compliance with evidentiary rules so the court can assess the request efficiently and accurately.
Once the petition is filed, objections can arise from beneficiaries or other interested parties. We evaluate objections, pursue settlement or mediation where feasible, and, if necessary, prepare legal responses and evidence for hearings. Our goal is to resolve disputes in a way that protects the trust’s purpose while avoiding unnecessary delay. When resolution cannot be reached, we present a clear record and persuasive legal argument to the court to obtain a final decision that addresses contested issues.
After hearings and any negotiated settlements, the court may enter orders that modify or reform the trust document, provide directions to trustees, or delineate rights among parties. We prepare proposed orders for judicial approval and assist with implementing the court’s directives, including updating trust records, executing necessary transfers, or preparing amended documents. We also advise trustees on ongoing administration obligations to ensure compliance with the court’s decision and to prevent future conflicts.
Drafting accurate court orders is essential to reflect the relief approved by the court and to provide clear instructions for trustees and beneficiaries. We prepare proposed orders and submit them for the court’s signature, ensuring they precisely match the agreed or adjudicated terms. Once entered, these orders form the authoritative basis for administration actions and asset transfers, protecting trustees who follow the court’s directives and providing beneficiaries with certainty about the trust’s future operation.
Following entry of a court order, trustees must implement changes, which may include transferring assets, updating account registrations, or revising distribution instructions. We assist with coordinating transfers, preparing amended trust records, and documenting actions to maintain a clear administrative trail. Good recordkeeping after a modification reduces the likelihood of future disputes and helps trustees demonstrate compliance with both the trust terms and the court’s orders during ongoing administration.
A petition to modify a trust is often warranted when the trust document contains an ambiguity or error that prevents faithful administration, when beneficiaries disagree about interpretation, or when significant life changes have made the original terms no longer practical. Common triggers include drafting mistakes, changes in family structure, altered asset ownership, or tax law updates that produce unintended results. Filing a petition seeks a judicial ruling that corrects the document or provides directions to the trustee so administration can proceed in a legally sound manner. The decision to file should consider whether nonjudicial alternatives exist, such as a signed agreement among all beneficiaries or trustee actions authorized by the trust. When parties cannot reach consensus or when the amendment affects third-party rights, a judicial petition provides finality and enforceability. Early assessment of risks and benefits helps determine if a petition is necessary and what evidence will be required to support the requested modification.
Timing for a trust modification petition varies depending on whether parties reach agreement, the court’s schedule, and whether the matter is contested. If parties negotiate a settlement or agree to a nonjudicial amendment, the process can be relatively short, sometimes completed in a matter of weeks once documents are prepared and signed. Judicial petitions, especially contested matters that require hearings or extensive evidence, can take several months to resolve and occasionally longer when complex discovery or multiple hearings are needed. The timeline also depends on procedural requirements like providing notice to beneficiaries, waiting periods set by court rules, and any mediation attempts. Preparing a thorough petition and pursuing early settlement discussions can shorten the process. Clients should expect clear communication from counsel about estimated timelines and milestones so they can plan for administration tasks affected by the pending petition.
Yes, beneficiaries may oppose a proposed trust modification, particularly if they believe the change would reduce or delay their distributions, alter their rights, or contradict the settlor’s intent. Opposition may be based on interpretations of the trust language, contesting the factual basis for the requested change, or asserting that a trustee lacks authority to propose the modification. When beneficiaries object, the court considers their responses alongside the petition and supporting evidence before making a decision. When opposition arises, counsel can often pursue mediation or settlement negotiations to reach an agreement that addresses concerns without prolonged litigation. If settlement is not possible, the court process allows each party to present evidence and arguments. Preparing a comprehensive record and demonstrating good faith notice and communication improves the prospects for a favorable resolution.
To reform a trust based on mistake or settlor intent, the petitioning party typically must present clear and convincing evidence showing that the trust language does not reflect what the settlor intended. Evidence may include contemporaneous communications, earlier drafts, testimony from those who worked with the settlor, financial records, and other documents that reveal the settlor’s expectations. Courts evaluate this evidence to determine whether reformation is appropriate and consistent with the settlor’s probable intent. The quality and organization of evidence matter. Declarations that explain the context and show how the error occurred help the court understand the nature of the mistake. When possible, presenting corroborating documentary evidence strengthens the petition and reduces reliance on disputed testimony, increasing the likelihood that the court will reform the trust to reflect the settlor’s actual intentions.
Alternatives to court petitions include nonjudicial settlement agreements and trust amendments executed under the authority of the settlor or by unanimous agreement of beneficiaries, when the trust instrument permits such actions. These approaches can be faster, less costly, and private, often resolving matters through negotiation, mediation, or collaborative drafting. When all interested parties consent, a written agreement can document the changes and avoid public court involvement. However, nonjudicial solutions require cooperation and may not be available when parties disagree or when the trust lacks amendment authority. In contested situations or when binding clarity is needed, a judicial petition remains the reliable option for achieving an enforceable outcome. Evaluating these alternatives early helps determine the most efficient path.
Trustees are protected when following a court-ordered modification because the court’s order provides clear, binding instructions that guide administration and reduce exposure to later claims. Acting pursuant to the court’s directives demonstrates that the trustee sought judicial approval and complied with a lawful order, which typically shields trustees from liability for actions authorized by the court. Proper documentation and adherence to the order are essential to maintain that protection. Before undertaking actions based on a court order, trustees should ensure the order is final and properly entered, and coordinate any asset transfers or account updates in line with its terms. Counsel can assist in translating the order into practical steps for implementation to minimize risk and demonstrate that the trustee fulfilled fiduciary duties under the court’s guidance.
Modifying a trust can have tax implications depending on the nature of the change, the type of trust, and the parties involved. Adjustments that alter distributions, grantor trust status, or ownership of certain assets may trigger income or estate tax consequences. It is important to evaluate potential tax effects before finalizing a modification and to coordinate with tax advisors or accountants when complex assets or retirement accounts are involved. When a petition is filed for modification, courts may consider tax consequences as part of the analysis, particularly when changes would defeat the settlor’s probable intent or create unintended burdens. Collaborating with financial professionals ensures that proposed modifications are designed to achieve the desired estate planning objectives while minimizing adverse tax outcomes.
Costs for a trust modification petition vary by complexity, the need for discovery, and whether the matter is contested. Nonjudicial agreements typically entail lower fees because they avoid court filing costs and hearings, while contested judicial petitions require court fees, preparation of pleadings, declarations, potential expert input, and hearing time. Clients should expect transparency about fee structures and likely cost ranges during the initial assessment so they can make informed decisions about pursuing a petition versus exploring alternatives. Efforts to streamline the process, such as focusing on core issues, pursuing mediation, and preparing strong evidence early, can reduce overall expense. When significant assets or complex legal questions are involved, investing in a thorough presentation often yields better long-term results by producing binding resolutions that prevent future disputes and additional costs.
Notice requirements for trust modification petitions generally mandate providing timely notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties so they can respond or object. The precise rules depend on the type of petition and the jurisdiction, but common practice includes mailing or personal service of the petition and any hearing notices to all identified interested persons. Proper service is critical to preserve procedural rights and prevent delays caused by defective notice procedures. When some interested parties cannot be located, courts may permit alternative methods of notice, such as publication or service by other means, following statutory guidelines. Counsel assists in preparing and executing proper notice, documenting service, and addressing any challenges to the sufficiency of notice that could affect the court’s ability to proceed with the petition.
A settlor who is alive and retains capacity can often modify or revoke a revocable trust directly, which can prevent the need for later petitions. Making changes while capacity is intact allows the settlor to amend or restate trust terms clearly and execute documents that reflect current intentions, thereby reducing the likelihood of disputes after incapacity or death. Properly updating estate planning documents when circumstances change is a proactive way to avoid future litigation. When capacity is diminished, modifications become more complicated and may require court proceedings to determine capacity or authorize changes. It is therefore advisable for settlors to review and update trust documents periodically to ensure they reflect current wishes and to minimize potential conflicts among beneficiaries after the settlor is no longer able to act.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas