If you are navigating the aftermath of a deceased loved one’s estate where assets were transferred into a trust but certain property titles may not match trust documentation, a Heggstad Petition can help clarify ownership and allow proper distribution. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist clients in Diablo and surrounding areas with petitions that request the court to recognize transfers as trust assets even when paperwork is incomplete or inconsistent. This process helps avoid prolonged probate and ensures assets are treated according to the settlor’s intentions while protecting beneficiaries’ interests under California law.
A Heggstad Petition is often used when a trust exists but an asset was never re-titled or a transfer was not fully documented before the settlor’s passing. Filing the petition asks the court to confirm that the asset should be considered part of the trust, enabling trustees or beneficiaries to manage or distribute those assets without separate probate proceedings. For residents of Diablo and Contra Costa County, understanding this remedy and when it applies can prevent delay and expense, allowing families to resolve property issues and proceed with estate administration in a steadier, more predictable manner.
A successful Heggstad Petition provides legal confirmation that particular assets were intended to be trust property, which can prevent those assets from becoming stuck in a separate probate administration. That confirmation reduces administrative friction, helps avoid duplicate legal proceedings, and supports timely distribution to beneficiaries. In practical terms, resolving title or transfer ambiguities through a petition can restore access to financial accounts, real estate, or other property and allow trustees to fulfill their duties with greater certainty. For families in Diablo and neighboring communities, this remedy can preserve estate value and minimize disputes during a sensitive time.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve clients across San Jose, Diablo, and Contra Costa County with a focus on estate planning and post-death administration matters, including Heggstad Petitions. Our approach is client-centered and practical: we assess documentation, review trust instruments, and pursue court relief when needed to have assets recognized as trust property. We aim to guide clients through each procedural step while communicating clearly about timelines, required evidence, and likely outcomes. Families working with our firm receive attentive representation backed by experience handling trust-related petitions in local California courts.
A Heggstad Petition asks a probate court to declare that property was transferred into a trust or was intended to be trust property, even when title documents are not perfectly aligned. The petition typically includes evidence such as beneficiary designations, trustee and settlor declarations, bank statements, or other indicia showing that the settlor intended the property to belong to the trust. In many cases the court will evaluate the totality of the evidence to determine intention. For Diablo residents, knowing what documentation and testimony are needed early on helps streamline the filing and reduces delays in resolving property issues.
Preparation for a Heggstad Petition requires careful assembly of records and witness statements to show the settlor’s intent and the circumstances of the transfer. The court process involves serving interested parties, filing required pleadings, and presenting evidence at a hearing if objections arise. Not all matters require litigation; many are resolved with clear documentation and agreement from beneficiaries or trustees. Still, where disputes occur, the petition provides a formal judicial path to recognition of trust ownership, helping trustees take control of assets and move forward with distribution consistent with the trust document.
A Heggstad Petition seeks a court declaration that specific property should be recognized as belonging to a trust based on the settlor’s intent, even if the formal title does not fully reflect the transfer. The remedy is used when an asset was effectively transferred or designated for the trust but administrative steps were incomplete. The aim is to avoid probate for those assets and to enable the trustee to manage or distribute them per the trust terms. In California courts, the petition must provide sufficient proof that the trust was intended to own the asset in question, balancing documentary and testimonial evidence.
Filing a Heggstad Petition involves documenting the trust instrument, establishing how the property was handled prior to the settlor’s death, and demonstrating consistent intent that the asset be part of the trust. Common supporting items include account records showing transfers, written communications, deeds, beneficiary forms, or affidavits from the trustee or others with firsthand knowledge. The process also requires complying with local court rules for probate petitions, preparing notices to beneficiaries and heirs, and being prepared to present evidence at a hearing if objections arise. Thorough preparation improves the chance of a favorable ruling and reduces the potential for contested litigation.
Understanding terminology helps clients navigate the Heggstad Petition process. Terms commonly encountered include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, trust instrument, probate, deed reformation, and deed of trust. Each term relates to how property is placed into or administered by a trust and how courts evaluate ownership claims. Familiarity with these concepts enables clearer communication with counsel and better preparation of supporting evidence. For individuals in Diablo and Contra Costa County, a basic grasp of these terms helps set expectations about timelines, documentation needs, and the potential outcomes when seeking judicial recognition that property should be treated as trust assets.
The settlor is the person who creates a trust by transferring assets into it or directing that certain assets be governed by the trust instrument. In Heggstad Petition matters, evidence of the settlor’s actions, statements, or documented intent is central to proving that property should be considered trust property. Records such as signed trust documents, correspondence, or contemporaneous notes can shed light on the settlor’s intentions. Establishing the settlor’s intent is often decisive for the court’s determination about whether an asset should be treated as part of the trust rather than as property subject to probate.
A trustee is the individual or institution appointed under the trust instrument to manage trust assets for the benefit of the beneficiaries. In the context of a Heggstad Petition, the trustee may petition the court or provide testimony and documentation demonstrating that property was intended to be held by the trust. The trustee’s role includes gathering records, communicating with beneficiaries, and taking necessary legal steps to have assets acknowledged as trust property so that they can be administered and distributed according to the trust’s terms.
A beneficiary is a person or entity designated by the trust instrument to receive the trust’s assets or benefits. Beneficiaries are typically notified of Heggstad Petitions and may object if they dispute the characterization of certain property as trust assets. Courts consider beneficiaries’ rights and interests when evaluating petitions, so clear documentation that shows the settlor’s intent and how the asset was treated during the settlor’s lifetime helps resolve potential disputes and supports equitable administration of the trust.
Probate avoidance refers to procedures and legal steps taken to ensure assets are distributed according to a trust rather than through probate court, which can be lengthier and more public. A Heggstad Petition is one method to have specific assets recognized as trust property and thereby avoid separate probate for those items. Demonstrating that assets were intended for the trust, even if formal title issues exist, helps trustees wind down estate matters more privately and efficiently, preserving estate value and reducing administrative burden for family members and beneficiaries.
When property intended for a trust lacks clear title documentation, several legal paths may be available, including filing a Heggstad Petition, initiating probate for the asset, or negotiating a voluntary transfer among interested parties. A Heggstad Petition offers a targeted judicial declaration that recognizes trust ownership without full probate administration for that asset. Probate, by contrast, can be more time-consuming and public. Informal agreements can work when parties consent, but they require clear evidence and mutual cooperation. Choosing the best option depends on the facts, the level of cooperation among heirs, and the quality of supporting documentation.
A limited approach can be effective when there is clear documentary evidence showing the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust, such as contemporaneous account records, signed trust documents, or written communications. When parties agree about the facts and supporting records are readily available, a brief petition or administrative action may resolve the issue without extensive litigation. This path reduces time and expense and allows trustees to proceed with distribution. For families in Diablo, gathering and presenting thorough records early increases the likelihood that a straightforward remedy will succeed.
When beneficiaries and heirs are in agreement about asset ownership and intend to honor the trust, informal resolution or a short, uncontested petition may be sufficient to have the court acknowledge the trust’s claim. Cooperative parties can streamline the process by submitting joint declarations, stipulated facts, or agreed-upon deeds that clarify title. This approach minimizes court time and expense and facilitates timely asset management and distribution. In practice, parties who can collaborate reduce the need for extended hearings or contested proceedings, benefiting the estate and family relationships.
A comprehensive legal approach is warranted when title issues are complicated, documentation is inconsistent, or multiple parties present conflicting accounts of the settlor’s intent. In such cases, a detailed petition supported by affidavits, forensic accounting, or deposition testimony may be necessary to persuade the court. Comprehensive preparation helps anticipate objections and ensures that all relevant legal arguments and evidence are presented. This approach reduces the risk of an unfavorable ruling and works to secure a durable resolution that allows trustees to administer assets with legal certainty.
When beneficiaries or heirs dispute whether property belongs to a trust, a full legal strategy can manage litigation risks, protect beneficiary rights, and preserve estate value. This may include discovery, expert reports, and contested hearings to evaluate competing evidence and testimony. Effective advocacy in contested matters involves organizing the record, addressing procedural requirements, and negotiating resolutions when possible. In scenarios where disagreement is entrenched, a thorough and proactive legal plan helps guide the matter to a fair and enforceable outcome under California probate rules.
A comprehensive approach to a Heggstad Petition helps ensure that all relevant evidence is gathered and presented persuasively to the court, reducing the chance of lingering disputes and enabling trustees to act with confidence. It can protect beneficiaries from future claims, clarify title for real property transactions, and reduce the odds of later litigation that could drain estate assets. For families dealing with the emotional stress of estate administration, a thorough legal strategy provides structure, clear next steps, and a higher likelihood of timely resolution consistent with the settlor’s wishes.
Comprehensive preparation also anticipates potential challenges such as missing documentation or competing beneficiary claims, allowing counsel to address weaknesses in the record before they become legal obstacles. This proactive work often shortens the overall timeline by preventing repeated filings or unexpected hearings. Additionally, by presenting a complete factual and legal case, trustees and beneficiaries are better positioned to negotiate settlements or secure court orders that facilitate efficient distribution, transfer, or sale of assets held or claimed by the trust.
When a petition is thoroughly prepared and supported by comprehensive documentation, the risk of future challenges to trust ownership is reduced because the court’s order will rest on a full evidentiary record. That order can provide clarity and finality for trustees and beneficiaries, minimizing the chance that disputed assets will re-emerge as contested matters later on. This legal certainty preserves estate resources and allows families to move forward with distribution and financial planning without ongoing uncertainty about the title to key assets.
Securing judicial recognition that assets belong to a trust simplifies subsequent transactions, such as selling real estate or transferring account ownership, because banks, title companies, and other institutions typically rely on court orders and clear documentation. A comprehensive approach ensures that required records and legal determinations are in place before those transactions occur, reducing delays. For trustees and beneficiaries in Diablo and the surrounding Bay Area, this smoother administrative path translates into more predictable outcomes and fewer administrative headaches when assets must be liquidated, transferred, or distributed.
Begin compiling all relevant records as soon as possible, including trust documents, account statements, deeds, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent. Early collection of this evidence reduces the risk of missing items and strengthens the factual basis for a petition. Accurate timelines, transaction histories, and witness contact information help create a persuasive case. Organizing materials before filing improves efficiency, shortens court processing time, and supports a smoother court hearing if one becomes necessary in Contra Costa County.
Familiarize yourself with local probate court procedures and deadlines, including required forms, notice rules, and evidence standards that apply to Heggstad Petitions. Ensuring notices are properly served, pleadings are filed on time, and supporting declarations meet court expectations can prevent procedural setbacks. Anticipating potential objections and preparing thorough affidavits or declarations from knowledgeable witnesses strengthens the petition and helps the court reach a clear determination. Being procedurally prepared leads to more efficient resolution in Diablo and Contra Costa County courts.
Consider a Heggstad Petition when you encounter assets that appear to belong to a trust but lack formal title alignment or when incomplete transfers leave the trust’s ownership unclear. This petition can provide a judicial declaration that aligns asset handling with the settlor’s intent and the trust’s terms, avoiding separate probate for those items. It is particularly beneficial when avoiding delay and reducing administrative burden is a priority, and when beneficiaries seek a clear and enforceable route to resolve disputes or ambiguities in trust property classification.
Another common reason to pursue a petition is to allow trustees to manage, sell, or transfer assets that institutions require clear legal authority to handle. Financial institutions and title companies often need court orders or clear documentation before allowing transactions. A Heggstad Petition supplies that authority by having the court recognize the asset as part of the trust, facilitating necessary financial steps without opening widespread probate proceedings. For families in Diablo and the Bay Area, this option can conserve estate resources and expedite practical steps for asset disposition.
Typical circumstances include situations where a deed was never re-titled into the trust, bank accounts were not retitled but had trust instructions, or assets were transferred informally and lack a clear paper trail. It also applies when a settlor executed a trust but later purchased property without changing title, or when beneficiary designations conflict with trust documents. Any case where the trust’s ownership of an asset is ambiguous or disputed may benefit from a petition to secure clear judicial recognition that the property belongs to the trust for administration and distribution purposes.
Real property that was intended to be owned by a trust but remains titled in the settlor’s name is a frequent scenario prompting a Heggstad Petition. The petition asks the court to recognize the settlor’s intent and declare that the property should be treated as trust property. This judicial recognition enables trustees to sell, transfer, or manage the property consistent with trust terms. Securing a court order in such cases helps remove clouded title concerns and permits necessary transactions with banks and title companies.
Bank or investment accounts that have beneficiary designations inconsistent with trust documentation can create confusion about where funds belong. A Heggstad Petition can reconcile such contradictions by presenting evidence that the settlor intended the accounts to be trust assets. When courts accept that intent, trustees gain authority to access or transfer the funds in accordance with the trust. Resolving these conflicts through a judicial declaration helps prevent separate probate claims and supports smoother distribution to the intended beneficiaries.
Sometimes assets were informally placed into a trust or managed in a way that suggests trust ownership without formal documentation, such as transfers via check or informal title changes. In those circumstances, a petition that compiles transaction records, witness statements, and relevant correspondence can show the settlor’s intent. The court can then declare the asset to be part of the trust. This approach helps solidify the record, giving trustees legal authority to manage or distribute assets without resorting to full probate administration for those items.
We provide local assistance to individuals in Diablo and nearby communities to help assemble evidence, prepare petitions, and file the necessary paperwork with the probate court. Our practice is sensitive to the practical and emotional challenges families face when dealing with estate administration, and we strive to communicate clearly about steps, timelines, and likely outcomes. Whether the matter is relatively straightforward or contested, we work to secure judicial recognition of trust assets so trustees can move forward with management and distribution consistent with the settlor’s documented wishes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offer focused probate and trust administration services for residents of Diablo, San Jose, and Contra Costa County. We assist clients in gathering necessary records, preparing petitions, and navigating local court procedures with attention to detail. Our practice emphasizes clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, timely filing, and preparing persuasive documentation to support recognition of trust ownership. We aim to achieve efficient, durable results that align with the settlor’s intentions and protect beneficiaries’ interests throughout the process.
Our team guides clients through all stages of the petition process, from initial case review to drafting pleadings and serving notice on interested parties. We also prepare for potential objections and hearings, working to resolve disputes when possible and litigate when necessary. By proactively addressing evidentiary needs and court requirements, we help minimize delays and unexpected procedural issues. For families navigating asset recognition matters in Diablo, having a firm that is familiar with local probate procedures and expectations can make a meaningful difference in outcomes and timelines.
We understand the sensitivity of estate matters and aim to provide responsive, practical counsel that helps clients make informed decisions. Our priority is to secure court orders or agreements that enable trustees to manage and distribute assets in a way that honors the settlor’s wishes while safeguarding beneficiary interests. We endeavor to keep clients apprised of developments, explain options clearly, and pursue the most efficient path to resolution whether matters are uncontested or require formal court attention in Contra Costa County.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to identify the asset at issue, collect trust and transfer documentation, and determine which parties must be notified. We then craft a petition tailored to the facts, prepare supporting declarations, and file with the appropriate probate court in Contra Costa County. We serve interested parties, monitor for objections, and present evidence at a hearing if required. Throughout this process we maintain communication with trustees and beneficiaries to facilitate cooperation and work toward a clear judicial determination that supports effective trust administration.
The first step involves reviewing the trust document, related estate planning materials, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent. We identify witnesses and potential declarants who can attest to the settlor’s actions and intentions. This stage also includes verifying whether the asset has existing title issues, observing any beneficiary designations, and assessing whether informal resolutions are possible. A thorough intake sets the foundation for a persuasive petition and reduces the likelihood of later evidentiary challenges in court.
We meticulously review trust documents, deeds, account statements, and any other records relating to the asset to identify signs that the settlor intended the property to be held by the trust. This review helps determine the types of supporting evidence that will be most persuasive to the court, including transactional histories, trustee actions, and written directions. Identifying gaps early allows us to secure necessary affidavits or supplemental records and to anticipate potential weaknesses in the record that may require additional proof or explanation at a hearing.
We identify witnesses such as trustees, family members, or professionals who had direct knowledge of the settlor’s intent and prepare declarations to document their observations. These declarations typically recount the circumstances surrounding the alleged transfer, conversations with the settlor, and any actions indicating trust ownership. Carefully drafted declarations that comply with court standards are essential for establishing a factual record. Preparing witness statements early strengthens the petition and helps resolve potential disputes before they escalate to contested hearings.
After preparing the petition and supporting declarations, we file the documents with the appropriate probate court and arrange service on all required parties, including beneficiaries and potential heirs. Proper notice is key to ensuring the court can act and to giving interested parties an opportunity to respond. We follow local rules for probate petitions and monitor responses or objections after filing. Timely and proper service reduces procedural challenges and keeps the case moving toward a hearing or resolution.
We draft the petition, supporting declarations, and proposed orders in compliance with applicable local court rules, ensuring formatting, filing fees, and statutory requirements are met. Attention to these procedural details avoids unnecessary delays or rejections. Filing a clear and well-supported petition establishes the factual basis for a favorable ruling and reduces the need for supplemental filings. Our team verifies that all parties entitled to notice are identified and that service is completed according to statutory timelines to protect the court process.
Once the petition is filed, we arrange for proper service of notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and any interested parties and monitor the response period set by the court. If objections are filed, we assess the basis for those objections and may seek to negotiate a resolution or prepare to defend the petition at a hearing. Prompt tracking of deadlines and responses helps prevent procedural issues and ensures the matter progresses efficiently toward a hearing or stipulated outcome.
If objections are raised or the court requests further evidence, a hearing may be scheduled where we present declarations, documentary proof, and witness testimony if necessary. At the hearing the court evaluates the totality of the evidence to determine whether the asset should be recognized as trust property. When the court is satisfied, it issues an order declaring the asset to be part of the trust, enabling trustees to administer or distribute the property per the trust terms. A clear order simplifies future transactions and minimizes the risk of renewed disputes.
At the hearing, we present documentary evidence and, if required, direct testimony from witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s actions and intent. A focused presentation addresses any inconsistencies and clarifies how the asset was treated prior to the settlor’s passing. Clearly organized evidence and credible witness statements help the court reach a considered determination. Our objective at the hearing is to secure a definitive order that recognizes the asset as trust property and provides trustees with usable legal authority.
After the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, we assist trustees with the practical steps to effectuate the decision, such as communicating the order to financial institutions or title companies, recording necessary documents, and carrying out transfers or distributions in line with the trust. Ensuring institutions accept and act on the order is essential to completing the administrative process. We follow up on implementation to confirm assets are accessible and properly handled according to the trust instrument.
A Heggstad Petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to recognize certain property as part of a trust despite defects in formal title or documentation. It is used when a trust exists but specific assets were not properly retitled or when the settlor’s actions indicate an intent to place the property in the trust. The petition compiles evidence showing the settlor’s intent and asks the court for a declaration that the asset should be administered under the trust rather than through separate probate. This remedy is particularly useful when the goal is to avoid the costs and delays of probate for particular assets while ensuring that trustees have clear legal authority to manage and distribute trust property. Successful petitions produce court orders that financial institutions and title companies typically accept, enabling trustees to proceed with transactions or distributions consistent with the trust instrument.
Timelines for Heggstad Petitions vary depending on court schedules, the complexity of the evidence, and whether objections are filed. In cases that are uncontested and well-documented, the matter can move more quickly, sometimes concluding within a few months. When objections arise or when the evidence requires additional development, the process can extend to longer timelines due to discovery, hearings, and scheduling constraints in Contra Costa County courts. Early preparation of documentation and providing clear notice to interested parties often shortens the process. Anticipating procedural requirements and preparing thorough declarations reduces delays and improves the likelihood of resolving the matter without protracted litigation, thereby helping trustees access and manage assets more promptly.
Supporting evidence for a Heggstad Petition commonly includes the trust instrument, deeds, bank and account statements showing transactions that reflect trust handling, correspondence indicating the settlor’s intent, and declarations from trustees or witnesses who observed the settlor’s actions. The court evaluates the totality of this evidence to determine whether the settlor intended the asset to be held by the trust. Clear, contemporaneous records are especially helpful in establishing that intent. Affidavits or declarations from individuals with firsthand knowledge can fill gaps when formal documents are missing. Providing a well-organized set of records and credible witness statements enhances the petition’s persuasiveness and helps the court reach a determination that minimizes the risk of future disputes.
Yes, beneficiaries and heirs have the right to object to a Heggstad Petition if they dispute the facts or the settlor’s intent. When objections are filed, the court will consider the competing evidence and may schedule a hearing to resolve factual disputes. Objections require the petitioner to respond with additional evidence or legal arguments to support the requested declaration that the asset is trust property. Resolving objections may involve negotiation, additional documentation, or contested hearings. Effective preparation and clear communication with interested parties can sometimes prevent objections or lead to stipulated agreements that resolve the dispute without extended litigation, but the court process provides a formal mechanism to resolve unresolved disagreements.
A successful Heggstad Petition results in a court order declaring that the specified asset should be treated as trust property, which generally enables trustees to manage or distribute that asset without subjecting it to a separate probate administration. That judicial recognition helps avoid probate for the asset at issue, although the broader estate may still have probate matters if other assets remain outside the trust. The petition does not change substantive beneficiary rights under the trust but clarifies ownership for administrative purposes. With a clear court order, institutions are more likely to accept trustee authority, facilitating transfers and distributions consistent with the trust terms and reducing administrative burden for families.
Proper notice to interested parties is a critical component of filing a Heggstad Petition. Notice typically must be given to beneficiaries, heirs, and other parties who have an interest in the asset so they have an opportunity to object or respond. The exact notice requirements depend on local probate rules and statutory provisions, so attention to procedural detail is essential to avoid jurisdictional issues or later challenges based on inadequate service. Providing accurate notices and documentation early supports a fair process and helps prevent objections based on lack of information. When parties receive timely notice, many disputes can be resolved cooperatively, which streamlines the petition and reduces the potential for contested hearings or delays in the court’s consideration.
Courts may deny a Heggstad Petition when the evidence does not sufficiently demonstrate the settlor’s intent to place the asset in the trust or when documentation and testimony conflict in ways the court finds unpersuasive. Lack of credible records, inconsistent account histories, or unreliable witness statements can weaken a petition. Additionally, procedural defects such as inadequate notice or improper service can provide grounds for denial or dismissal without reaching the substantive merits. To reduce the risk of denial, petitioners should compile the strongest possible evidentiary record, ensure compliance with local filing rules, and be prepared to address any procedural deficiencies. A well-prepared petition that anticipates likely objections and addresses evidentiary gaps has a greater chance of achieving a favorable determination.
Heggstad Petitions can apply to bank and investment accounts, particularly when account titling or beneficiary designations are inconsistent with trust documentation. Evidence such as account statements, transfer records, and trustee actions demonstrating trust-related control supports a petition. For retirement plans, beneficiary designations and plan rules may affect how the asset is handled, so understanding plan-specific procedures is important before filing a petition. Institutions often require a court order or clear documentation before allowing trustees to access or transfer accounts. When trust ownership is unclear, a petition that compiles relevant financial records and explains the settlor’s intent can provide the legal authority institutions need to proceed with transactions consistent with the trust.
Costs for filing a Heggstad Petition vary based on factors such as court filing fees, the complexity of the factual record, and whether the matter is contested. Uncontested petitions with clear documentation generally incur lower attorney fees and court costs than contested matters requiring discovery or hearings. Local filing fees and any costs associated with serving notices should also be considered when budgeting for the process. When disputes arise, additional costs may include depositions, expert reports, or extended court appearances. Early preparation, cooperation among interested parties, and a focused evidentiary presentation can help control costs and lead to a more efficient resolution that conserves estate resources.
If a financial institution refuses to acknowledge trust ownership without a court order, a Heggstad Petition can provide the judicial declaration necessary to satisfy the institution’s requirements. Presenting a court order that clearly recognizes the asset as trust property typically resolves institutional hesitancy and permits trustees to proceed with transactions such as account transfers or withdrawals. Before filing, it is helpful to request the institution’s written explanation of requirements and to attempt producing documentation that the institution will accept. If those steps fail, a court order obtained through a petition provides the authoritative resolution institutions usually require, enabling trustees to manage the asset in accordance with the trust terms.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas