The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman helps residents of El Sobrante and Contra Costa County with trust modification petitions and other estate planning matters. If your circumstances, family dynamics, or financial situation have changed since you created a trust, a petition to modify the trust may be necessary to reflect current intentions. We provide clear information about how modification works, the parties typically involved, possible outcomes, and practical steps you can take to pursue a petition in California courts. Call 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation and learn whether a petition is the right path for your estate plan.
A trust modification petition can address changes such as relocation, new beneficiaries, shifts in tax law, or corrections to drafting errors. Unlike creating a new trust, a modification petition seeks to update the existing trust document with court approval when all required consents are not available from interested parties. This service is part of our estate planning practice, where we assist with revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related documents like powers of attorney and health care directives. Understanding the legal and practical steps involved can help you preserve your intentions and protect your assets for the people you care about.
A properly handled trust modification petition helps ensure that your trust continues to reflect your intentions and the realities of your life. When circumstances change — such as remarriage, death of a beneficiary, relocation, or significant financial shifts — updating trust terms can prevent future disputes, manage tax consequences, and clarify beneficiary distributions. Court-approved modifications are particularly valuable when a trustee or beneficiary refuses to consent, when a formal judicial determination is needed to correct ambiguous language, or when changes must be made while preserving the trust’s overall structure and protective aims. Pursuing a petition can reduce confusion and protect family relationships in the long term.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust litigation services to families across the Bay Area, including El Sobrante and Contra Costa County. Our office focuses on practical, client-centered solutions that align legal steps with personal goals. We assist clients with revocable living trusts, Heggstad and trust modification petitions, pour-over wills, and ancillary documents like powers of attorney and health care directives. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, clear communication about court procedures, and thoughtful planning that aims to preserve family relationships and minimize uncertainty during transitions.
A trust modification petition is a court proceeding that seeks to change the terms of an existing trust when informal amendment is not possible or when a formal judicial order is necessary. Common reasons for filing include the absence of required consents, ambiguity in the trust text, changes in beneficiary circumstances, or the need to fix drafting errors. The petition asks the court to approve the requested changes, which can range from clarifying language to substituting beneficiaries or adjusting distribution instructions. The process requires careful presentation of facts, supporting documentation, and notice to interested parties so the court can make an informed decision.
In California, courts consider the settlor’s intent, the trust document’s language, and any relevant statutes when evaluating a modification petition. Petitioners often include trustees, beneficiaries, or other interested parties seeking a judicial determination. The court will review evidence, hear any opposition, and decide whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s probable intentions and applicable law. Because court involvement may attract challenges from beneficiaries or creditors, preparing a clear factual record and offering reasonable alternatives can increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome while limiting contentious litigation.
A trust modification petition is a legal request to modify the terms of a trust through court order. This route is typically used when private amendment is not possible because the trust’s terms limit changes, required parties cannot consent, or there is a dispute about the settlor’s intent. Modifications may address distribution language, trustee powers, beneficiary designations, or administrative provisions. The petition sets out the factual and legal basis for the change and asks the court to authorize the trustee or another party to implement the amendment. The process is intended to preserve the settlor’s intent while resolving obstacles that prevent straightforward amendment.
Key elements of a trust modification petition include a clear statement of the requested changes, supporting facts about why the modification is needed, identification of interested parties, and evidence of any prior attempts to obtain consent. The typical process involves filing the petition, serving notice on beneficiaries and trustees, responding to any objections, and presenting evidence at a hearing. The court will weigh the settlor’s intent, statutory requirements, and potential impacts on beneficiaries. Preparing accurate trust records, beneficiary contact information, and contemporaneous documents increases the petition’s clarity and the court’s ability to reach a well-reasoned decision.
Understanding common terms helps you navigate the petition process and communicate effectively with the court and other interested parties. Important concepts include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, consent, petition, and judicial modification. Knowing what each term means and how it applies in your situation reduces confusion and helps you gather necessary documentation. It also frames expectations about timelines, notifications, and potential outcomes. Becoming familiar with these words will make discussions with your legal representative and court personnel more productive and clarify what evidence will support a petition.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and established its terms. In modification proceedings, the court seeks to honor the settlor’s intent as evidenced by the trust document and surrounding circumstances. If the settlor is alive, their contemporaneous wishes carry significant weight, though the court will also consider written records and consistent statements. When the settlor has passed away, the court examines the trust language, prior amendments, and any reliable evidence that sheds light on what the settlor intended when drafting or amending the trust. Establishing intent is often central to resolving modification requests.
A trustee is the person or entity appointed to manage trust assets and carry out the trust’s terms for beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties to administer the trust prudently, avoid conflicts of interest, and act in beneficiaries’ best interests. When a trustee seeks or responds to a modification petition, their records, accountings, and written communications can be important evidence. Courts will evaluate whether the proposed modification aligns with the trustee’s obligations and whether it reasonably reflects the settlor’s intent without creating unfair disadvantage to any beneficiary.
Beneficiaries are individuals or entities entitled to receive benefits under a trust, and they must typically receive notice of any modification petition. Interested parties can also include successor trustees, creditors, or other people with legal status affected by the trust. Their consent or objection can influence the court’s decision. Courts weigh whether the modification would alter expected distributions or rights and examine whether notice and procedural protections were properly followed. Ensuring timely notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties is essential for a fair and legally valid process.
A Heggstad petition is a related procedure used when assets intended for a trust were not properly transferred during the settlor’s lifetime. While distinct from a trust modification petition, both processes may arise together when trust administration is in flux. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that certain assets should be treated as trust property despite incomplete transfer formalities. Judges consider intent, contemporaneous documentation, and equity. Understanding how different filings interact helps document preparation and strategy when multiple remedies may be appropriate to preserve the settlor’s estate plan.
When considering trust changes, you may be able to use informal amendment or obtain written consent from all beneficiaries without court involvement. Informal routes are generally faster and less costly, but they require agreement and clear authority under the trust instrument. When consent cannot be secured or when the trust document restricts amendments, a trust modification petition offers a formal path to resolve disputes and obtain judicial approval. Each option carries trade-offs in time, privacy, expense, and certainty. Evaluating these choices with attention to family dynamics and document language helps identify the right approach.
If all beneficiaries and the trustee agree to the changes and the trust document permits amendment by agreement, an informal alteration or signed amendment may be sufficient. This approach avoids court involvement, preserves privacy, and typically reduces legal fees. Documentation should clearly state the new terms and be executed in accordance with the trust’s amendment provisions. Even when agreement is reached, maintaining clear records and updating trust schedules or asset designations helps prevent future disputes and ensures that trustees and financial institutions recognize and follow the revised instructions.
When the issue is ambiguity rather than fundamental disagreement, beneficiaries and trustees may resolve the matter by jointly executing an amendment or clarifying agreement. This preserves the integrity of the original trust while removing problematic wording that could cause misinterpretation later. A carefully drafted clarification should reflect the settlor’s likely intent and be signed by authorized parties. Maintaining transparent communication among family members and beneficiaries while documenting the reasoning behind changes reduces the risk of future litigation and supports smooth administration.
When required consents cannot be obtained or when beneficiaries dispute proposed changes, a court petition may be the only viable path to modify a trust and resolve contested issues. Court proceedings provide a formal mechanism for presenting evidence of the settlor’s intent and for the judge to issue binding orders. Such proceedings require careful factual development, legal pleading, and adherence to procedural rules, including notifying interested parties. Sound preparation of documents and evidence helps present a persuasive case and reduces the risk of delay or adverse rulings.
Some trust provisions contain drafting mistakes or ambiguous provisions that affect substantial assets or complicated beneficiary interests. In these situations, court approval may be necessary to correct errors, interpret unclear language, or address assets that were not properly transferred at the time of funding. Filing a petition enables the court to evaluate evidence about what the settlor intended and to issue orders that provide clarity and enforceability for trustees and institutions managing trust assets. A detailed factual record and precise legal arguments are essential to achieving a favorable resolution.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification, including preparing a petition and supporting evidence, provides legal certainty when private amendment is not possible. Court approval yields enforceable orders that settle disputes and provide clear direction to trustees, beneficiaries, and financial institutions. This approach can also help secure third-party recognition of changes, such as banks and title companies, reducing administrative friction. While court processes involve more time and expense than informal amendments, the long-term benefit of a stable, legally validated trust structure can outweigh short-term costs by preventing future litigation and disputes among family members.
A careful, court-focused strategy also allows parties to present comprehensive evidence about the settlor’s intent, correct deficiencies in trust documentation, and address competing claims in a structured legal forum. The resulting orders often clarify rights, responsibilities, and the appropriate distribution of assets, making administration smoother and reducing ambiguity for successor trustees. For families facing contested changes or complex asset questions, securing a judicial determination can protect beneficiaries from unexpected outcomes and support a fair, transparent resolution based on the record presented to the court.
A court-approved modification provides finality that informal agreements may lack, especially where not all parties can consent or where third-party recognition is necessary. Judicial orders carry weight with financial institutions, title companies, and successor fiduciaries, which helps ensure that revised terms are followed during trust administration. This enforceability reduces the risk of future challenges and clarifies trustees’ duties and beneficiaries’ rights. For clients concerned about lingering disputes or unclear administration instructions, pursuing court confirmation of changes can offer durable protection and a clear roadmap for carrying out the settlor’s intentions.
Obtaining a court order to modify a trust helps protect families from protracted disputes by creating a legally binding resolution that addresses competing claims and clarifies ambiguous provisions. Courts assess the evidence and provide reasoned rulings that bind parties, which lowers the prospect of re-litigation on the same issues. This stability benefits trustees who must administer assets and beneficiaries who rely on predictable distributions. Investing in a careful, documented petition process can limit uncertainty and help preserve family relationships by resolving contentious matters through a formal, transparent proceeding.
Before filing a petition, collect all trust documents, amendments, account statements, title records, and communications that shed light on the settlor’s intent and asset transfers. Records showing attempts to transfer property into the trust, beneficiary designations, and trustee accountings can be especially helpful. Organize documentation chronologically and note any witnesses or contemporaneous statements that support the requested modification. A well-documented factual record improves the clarity of the petition, assists the court in understanding the circumstances, and can reduce the scope of contested issues among interested parties.
Even when filing a petition, consider mediation or negotiation as a way to resolve disputes more quickly and privately. Courts often welcome efforts to reach agreement and may pause proceedings to allow settlement talks. Preparing clear proposals and demonstrating willingness to engage in good faith discussions can lead to efficient resolutions that avoid the time and cost of contested hearings. If mediation is unsuccessful, maintaining organized evidence and an orderly factual presentation will strengthen your position in court and help the judge reach a well-supported decision.
Consider a trust modification petition when changes to family composition, asset ownership, or the settlor’s circumstances make the current trust terms impractical or inconsistent with intended outcomes. Situations that commonly prompt petitions include beneficiary deaths, newly discovered drafting errors, incomplete funding, or the unavailability of required consents. A petition helps clarify or alter trust provisions when private amendment is not feasible. Early assessment of the trust document and communication with beneficiaries can reveal whether a petition is necessary or whether less formal remedies will achieve the desired result without court involvement.
You should also consider a petition when third-party recognition of modifications is important, such as updating title records or ensuring financial institutions accept revised distribution instructions. When trusts involve complicated assets or competing claims, seeking a judicial determination reduces ambiguity and provides enforceable guidance for trustees. Additionally, if the settlor’s intent is in doubt or evidence is incomplete, a petition allows the court to review relevant facts and issue an order that aligns administration with the most reliable understanding of the settlor’s wishes, which can prevent future conflicts among beneficiaries.
Several recurring scenarios lead families to petition for trust modifications, including incomplete transfers of assets to the trust, ambiguity in beneficiary designations, unforeseen tax implications, and disagreements among beneficiaries or trustees. Life events such as remarriage, the birth or death of a beneficiary, or relocation between states can create a need to update trust terms. When these issues cannot be resolved informally through consent or amendment, a petition provides a formal way to address the problem, obtain clarity, and secure the court’s authority to implement the changes.
Incomplete funding occurs when assets intended to be placed in a trust were never transferred properly, leaving them in the settlor’s name. A related petition, such as a Heggstad petition, or a modification order may be necessary to have those assets treated as trust property. The court will examine evidence of intent, contemporaneous documents, and transfer attempts. Proper documentation and clear presentation of the circumstances improve the court’s ability to grant relief that reflects the settlor’s original plan and ensures consistent administration of trust assets.
Ambiguous language or conflicting provisions within a trust can produce uncertainty about distribution, trustee powers, or beneficiary rights. When clarification cannot be obtained through mutual agreement, a petition asks the court to interpret the trust and issue a binding construction. Judges will consider the trust text, relevant amendments, and surrounding evidence to determine the most reasonable interpretation that reflects the settlor’s intent. A judicial construction eliminates lingering doubts and gives trustees clear instructions for administration.
Significant family changes, such as divorces, births, deaths, or financial shifts, can make original trust provisions unsuitable. When modifications are needed but consensus cannot be reached among beneficiaries, a petition provides a legal path to adjust distributions or trustee powers in a manner aligned with current realities. The court will evaluate whether proposed changes are reasonable and consistent with the settlor’s probable intent. A thoughtful petition helps reconcile the trust document with present-day circumstances while offering clear orders for future administration.
We are available to assist El Sobrante residents who need guidance on trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. Whether you need to correct a drafting error, address incomplete trust funding, or resolve a beneficiary dispute, we can help evaluate options and prepare a petition if court action is necessary. Our goal is to provide practical counsel, clear communication, and careful preparation so that the petition presents a persuasive and organized factual and legal case. Reach out by phone at 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation and next steps.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for clear guidance, thorough preparation of petitions, and responsive communication throughout the court process. We focus on building a factual record that supports requested changes, providing timely notices to interested parties, and working to minimize conflict where possible. Our practice includes drafting and reviewing trusts, Heggstad petitions, and related estate planning documents, allowing us to integrate petition strategy with broader estate plan goals. We help clients understand procedural requirements and practical consequences so they can make informed decisions.
When court action is required, careful document drafting and evidence presentation matter. We assist in gathering trust records, transfer documents, beneficiary communications, and other evidence that clarifies the settlor’s intent and the reasons for the requested modification. We also help clients assess alternatives like mediated settlement or informal amendment when those routes are appropriate. Clear organization and attention to procedural detail increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome and help avoid unnecessary delays or procedural pitfalls during the petition process.
Our firm provides personalized attention to each matter, aiming to balance legal strategy with family dynamics and financial realities. We explain options in plain language and help clients weigh the costs and benefits of informal changes versus court petitions. By preparing a strong factual record and considering settlement opportunities where appropriate, we pursue practicable solutions that align with clients’ priorities. If litigation becomes necessary, we present a well-documented case focused on obtaining a clear court order that supports effective trust administration going forward.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust document, related records, and a discussion of the settlor’s goals and family circumstances. We identify interested parties, assess whether informal amendment or consent is possible, and advise on the probable benefits and drawbacks of filing a petition. If court action is advisable, we prepare the petition, gather supporting evidence, and ensure proper service and notice. We keep clients informed about procedural steps, potential timelines, and possible outcomes, aiming to reach a resolution that preserves the settlor’s intent and minimizes disruption to trust administration.
The first step is a comprehensive assessment of the trust instrument, amendments, asset records, and any correspondence or notes indicating the settlor’s intent. We review beneficiary designations, transfer documents, and trustee accountings to determine whether an informal amendment is feasible or whether a petition is advisable. This phase focuses on building a clear factual narrative and identifying documentary evidence that supports the proposed modification. A thorough initial review lays the groundwork for preparing a persuasive petition and anticipates likely objections or procedural hurdles.
Collecting and organizing documents is essential to a strong petition. We work with clients to obtain trust instruments, amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary communications, and any writings that reflect the settlor’s intent. If transfers to the trust were incomplete, we seek evidence such as drafts, title documents, and contemporaneous instructions. Properly documented evidence strengthens the factual record presented to the court and helps ensure that the judge can evaluate the requested modification against reliable information about the settlor’s goals and the trust’s administration history.
Once the factual record is assembled, we identify all beneficiaries, successor trustees, and other interested parties who must receive notice of the petition. California procedure requires providing appropriate notice so parties can object or participate. We prepare service documents and, when necessary, document efforts to locate missing parties. Ensuring accurate and timely notice reduces procedural risks and allows the court to consider all relevant viewpoints, which supports a fair and efficient adjudication of the modification request.
After preparing the petition and supporting evidence, we file the necessary pleadings with the appropriate probate court and arrange service on all interested parties. Filing initiates the court process and sets timelines for response and hearing. Properly prepared exhibits, declarations, and notices of petition provide the court with the information needed to evaluate the request. We monitor deadlines, handle procedural filings, and address any preliminary objections or requests for additional documentation that may arise during this phase.
When objections are raised, the process may require additional documentation, declarations, or limited discovery to resolve factual disputes. We assist clients in responding to objections by compiling clarified evidence, drafting responsive pleadings, and negotiating potential stipulations where appropriate. Efficient handling of discovery and objections helps focus the court’s review on the essential issues and can narrow disputed topics before hearing. Clear communication with opposing parties and the court can often reduce contention and expedite resolution.
Throughout the process we evaluate whether mediated resolution or negotiated settlement could achieve the client’s goals without a full contested hearing. Mediation can preserve privacy, reduce costs, and provide flexible solutions acceptable to multiple parties. When settlement is viable, we prepare documentation to formalize the agreement and seek the court’s approval where required. If mediation is not successful, we proceed to prepare a hearing record that presents the petition and evidence in a clear and organized manner for the judge’s consideration.
At the hearing, the court reviews the petition, evidence, and any objections, and considers testimony or declarations if necessary. The judge will evaluate whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s probable intent and applicable law. If the court grants the petition, it will issue an order specifying the permitted changes and any instructions for implementation. The court’s order provides legal authority for trustees and third parties to act in accordance with the revised terms, which helps ensure consistent administration and reduces the risk of subsequent disputes.
Following a favorable hearing, we prepare the formal court order that reflects the judge’s decision and any agreed terms. The order is drafted to provide clear, enforceable instructions for trustees and beneficiaries and to address implementation details such as asset transfers or record updates. Filing the signed order with the court and distributing certified copies to relevant institutions ensures that financial institutions and title companies recognize the modification. Clear post-hearing documentation reduces administrative hurdles and supports consistent trust administration.
After obtaining an order, implementing changes with banks, brokerages, and title companies may require presenting certified court documents and updated trust schedules. We guide clients through submission requirements and help coordinate with institutions to complete transfers and update account registrations. Ensuring that asset records are changed to reflect the court-ordered modification prevents confusion and helps trustees carry out distributions in accordance with the revised trust terms. Follow-up ensures that the judge’s order has its intended effect in practice.
A trust modification petition is a court filing asking a judge to approve changes to an existing trust when informal amendment or unanimous consent is not feasible. It is typically used if required consents are missing, if there is ambiguity in the trust document, or when asset transfer issues require a judicial determination. The petition explains why the change is necessary, presents supporting evidence, and seeks a court order that makes the requested revision enforceable for trustees and third parties. Filing a petition becomes necessary when informal approaches are blocked by disagreement, uncertainty, or procedural restrictions in the trust document. The court will evaluate the settlor’s apparent intent, the trust text, and supporting documents. The decision may correct errors, clarify language, or authorize changes that reflect the settlor’s probable wishes while providing a lawful basis for trustees to act under the revised terms.
Not every trust modification requires or is suited to a petition. If the trust document allows amendment by the settlor or by unanimous consent of beneficiaries and those parties agree, an informal amendment can avoid court involvement. Such amendments preserve privacy and typically incur lower costs, but they require clear agreement and proper execution in line with the trust’s amendment provisions. When required parties cannot consent or when property transfers and drafting errors complicate the situation, a petition may be the appropriate route. The court can resolve disputes and issue an enforceable order that clarifies trustee authority and beneficiary rights, which can be essential in cases with contested issues or incomplete trust funding.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies with the complexity of the case, the number of interested parties, and court scheduling. Initial document review, evidence gathering, and proper service may take weeks to months. After filing, statutory notice periods and response deadlines will extend the timeline before a hearing can be scheduled. Contested matters, objections, or discovery needs can lengthen the process further. If parties cooperate or mediation is effective, resolution may be quicker. Preparing a clear factual record and addressing procedural requirements promptly helps avoid unnecessary delays and supports a more efficient path to a hearing and court order.
Yes. California probate procedure generally requires that beneficiaries and other interested parties receive notice of a trust modification petition so they may respond or appear. Proper notice is a key procedural safeguard and helps ensure the court has input from potentially affected persons before issuing an order. Failing to provide required notice can result in delays or procedural complications that impede the petition’s progress. When contact information is uncertain, the petitioner must demonstrate reasonable efforts to locate and notify interested parties. Documenting these efforts and following the court’s rules for substituted or published notice helps satisfy procedural requirements and allows the court to proceed with a complete record of who was informed of the proceedings.
Courts consider the trust instrument, any amendments, and contemporaneous evidence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. Relevant materials include drafts, transfer documents, trustee accountings, correspondence, and witness statements that clarify what the settlor intended when creating or amending the trust. The judge will evaluate whether the proposed modification reasonably aligns with that intent and applicable legal standards. The court also examines whether proper notice was given and whether modifications would unfairly prejudice beneficiaries. Material evidence that demonstrates consistent intent or shows administrative necessity strengthens the petition and helps the court reach a reasoned decision based on the existing record.
Yes. A petition can address assets that were intended for the trust but were never formally transferred. In such cases, related proceedings like a Heggstad petition can ask the court to treat the assets as trust property based on the settlor’s demonstrated intent. Courts look for evidence that the settlor intended the assets to be part of the trust, such as transfer attempts, contemporaneous instructions, or account designations. Presenting clear documentation of intent and the steps taken toward funding the trust is important. When the court recognizes such assets as trust property, it clarifies administration and ensures trustees can manage and distribute those assets in accordance with the trust’s terms.
Yes. When all interested parties agree, executing a formal amendment or clarification may avoid the time and expense of court proceedings. Mediation or negotiation can also be effective in resolving disputes and reaching an arrangement that satisfies beneficiaries and trustees. These alternatives preserve privacy and can be less adversarial than litigation. However, if unanimous consent is not possible or if third-party recognition of changes is required, alternatives may not suffice. In those situations, a petition provides a formal remedy that creates an enforceable court order supporting the modified trust terms and guiding trustees and institutions during administration.
If a beneficiary objects, the matter may proceed to contested hearings where the court evaluates evidence and arguments from all parties. Objections can lead to additional discovery, declarations, or testimony to resolve factual disputes. The court will weigh objections alongside the presented evidence to determine whether modification is appropriate and consistent with the settlor’s intent. Because objections can lengthen the timeline and increase costs, parties are often encouraged to explore mediated settlement or narrowing the issues to reduce contention. When objections persist, a clear factual record and persuasive legal argument are essential to obtaining a court ruling that resolves the dispute and establishes enforceable instructions for trust administration.
Preparation for a hearing includes organizing documents, preparing declarations or witness statements, and anticipating likely objections. Chronological exhibits that show transfer attempts, prior amendments, and communications illustrating intent help the court understand the need for modification. Clear, concise presentations of the evidence allow the judge to focus on the central issues rather than procedural noise. Working with counsel to prepare declarants, outline the factual narrative, and ensure procedural compliance increases the hearing’s effectiveness. Expect the court to ask about notice, the settlor’s intent, and the practical consequences of the requested modification, and prepare to address those topics with documented facts and reasoned explanations.
Whether a court-ordered modification affects tax treatment depends on the nature of the changes and the timing of the modification relative to tax events. Some modifications are administrative and do not change taxable events, while others that alter asset ownership or distributions could have tax implications. Consultation with tax advisors helps assess potential tax consequences before pursuing major changes. Courts focus on legal authority to modify trust terms, while tax professionals analyze the fiscal results of those modifications. Coordinating legal strategy with tax advice reduces the risk of unexpected tax liabilities and helps structure modifications in a way that aligns with both estate planning and tax planning considerations.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas