A Heggstad petition can help move assets into a trust when title discrepancies or administrative oversights leave some property in a decedent’s name rather than the trust. If you are handling the affairs of someone who created a trust in California and discover assets were never properly transferred to that trust, a Heggstad petition may be needed to ensure those assets are treated as trust property. This guide explains how the petition works in Contra Costa County, what evidence is typically required, and what outcomes to expect when you pursue this remedy through the probate court in Martinez.
Navigating a Heggstad petition requires careful documentation, clear proof of the decedent’s intent, and an understanding of applicable California statutory and case law. Many families prefer to resolve these matters through the probate court to avoid future challenges and to make sure trust beneficiaries receive the intended assets. This page outlines the procedural steps, the types of supporting evidence that strengthen a petition, possible timelines, and typical costs. It is designed to help Martinez and Contra Costa County residents take practical next steps when an apparent trust asset is still titled in a decedent’s individual name.
A Heggstad petition safeguards a trust creator’s wishes by seeking a court declaration that certain property belongs to the trust despite incorrect or incomplete title transfers. This process prevents assets from being treated as part of a probate estate and helps maintain the integrity of estate plans that use living trusts. Benefits include restoring the trust’s full asset picture, enabling distributions to beneficiaries according to trust terms, and reducing the likelihood of future litigation. For beneficiaries and trustees in Martinez, pursuing a Heggstad petition can streamline administration and provide legal clarity on ownership of contested items.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve California clients with a focus on practical estate planning and probate administration. Our approach centers on careful document review, clear communication with families, and measured advocacy in probate court when necessary. We draw from years of handling complex trust matters, including Heggstad petitions and related trust clarification proceedings. For Martinez residents, we aim to explain options plainly, prepare thorough petitions, and represent trustees and beneficiaries in a manner that seeks efficient resolution while protecting client interests and family relationships during what can be a sensitive time.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that certain assets were intended to be held in a trust even though they remain in the decedent’s name. To prevail, petitioners typically present the trust document, evidence of intent such as transfer instructions or transactional history, and any correspondence or will provisions that confirm the decedent’s plan. The court examines whether the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust and whether that intent can be established by a preponderance of the evidence. Steps include filing a petition in the local probate court, providing notice to interested parties, and attending a hearing if objections arise.
Not every title discrepancy requires a Heggstad petition; sometimes administrative transfer after death or a simple corrective deed suffices. However, when ownership is disputed or when assets are substantial and affect trust distributions, a formal petition provides a clear legal determination. The process can involve appraisals, witness declarations, bank records, and chain-of-title documents. In Contra Costa County, local practice and court calendars influence timing. Engaging someone familiar with probate filings in Martinez can help anticipate evidentiary needs, manage notice requirements, and reduce delays that might otherwise prolong administration.
A Heggstad petition is a California probate filing that asks the court to treat property as trust assets despite being titled in a decedent’s individual name. Named after a California case that established relevant principles, the petition relies on evidence showing the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Common scenarios include bank accounts, real property, or investments that were never retitled or properly transferred. The petition seeks a judicial declaration that the property is trust-owned, which clarifies administration, supports distribution to beneficiaries, and minimizes uncertainty about asset ownership going forward.
Successful Heggstad petitions typically rest on a combination of documentary evidence and testimony. Essential elements include the trust instrument, evidence of the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, proof of ownership or attempted transfers, and clear identification of the assets at issue. Filing requires preparing a petition, serving notice to beneficiaries and heirs, and submitting supporting declarations and exhibits. The court may set a hearing where objections can be raised. If the judge finds the weight of the evidence supports trust ownership, the court will enter an order that effectively places the asset under trust administration.
Understanding common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the petition process. This short glossary explains phrases you will encounter in probate filings and trust clarification matters, demystifying legal language and helping you gather the right documentation. Familiarity with these terms can also aid in preparing declarations and responding to court requests. The definitions below are tailored to Heggstad petitions and trust administration in California and will help residents of Martinez and Contra Costa County make informed decisions about how to proceed when assets were not properly moved into a trust.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which a trustmaker transfers property to a trustee to manage for beneficiaries according to the document’s terms. In living trusts commonly used in California, the trustmaker often serves as trustee during lifetime and names successor trustees for after death or incapacity. Trust documents specify how assets are to be managed and distributed, and a Heggstad petition addresses situations where assets intended for a trust remain in the decedent’s individual name. Understanding the trust instrument is essential to proving intent and resolving title issues in probate court.
A petition is a formal written request filed with the probate court asking for a legal determination or order. In the context of a Heggstad proceeding, the petition requests recognition that specific property belongs to the trust despite title discrepancies. The petition outlines the facts supporting the claim, identifies interested parties and beneficiaries, and attaches supporting evidence such as the trust document, transfer records, and declarations from witnesses. The court reviews the petition, ensures proper notice has been given, and may hold a hearing before issuing an order.
Decedent intent refers to the intentions of the person who created the trust regarding the placement and distribution of assets. Proving intent is central to a Heggstad petition; petitioners must show that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Evidence can include the trust language, draft documents, transfer instructions, beneficiary designations, and communications indicating the decedent’s wishes. Courts weigh such evidence to determine whether ownership should be recognized as belonging to the trust despite record title remaining in the decedent’s name.
A probate court order is a judicial ruling that resolves a legal question affecting estate or trust administration. In a Heggstad matter, the order formally declares that specific property is trust-owned and directs how the asset should be treated by the trustee. Once entered, the order can be recorded to update title records or used to instruct institutions holding the asset to transfer it to the trust. A clear order reduces uncertainty and provides legal authority for trustees to manage and distribute the asset in accordance with the trust terms.
When assets are discovered in a decedent’s name, several paths may be available: completing corrective transfers, filing a Heggstad petition, or opening a probate estate. Corrective transfers may work when institutions accept affidavits or short forms and when no party objects. A Heggstad petition provides a formal court declaration that an asset belongs to a trust and can be appropriate when title issues are contested or when clear judicial clarity is preferred. Probate may be required when assets lack beneficiary designations or when estate administration is otherwise necessary. Each route has different timelines, costs, and evidentiary needs that should be weighed against your goals.
A limited approach may be sufficient when banks, brokerages, or title companies accept corrective documentation that transfers assets into a trust without court involvement. This can occur when documentation clearly shows the trust existed and the decedent intended the asset to be trust property. Institutions sometimes accept a certified copy of the trust, a death certificate, and a trustee declaration. Choosing this path can avoid court costs and delay, but it depends on the willingness of the institution to accept those papers. When other heirs or beneficiaries might dispute the transfer, court involvement may still be preferable.
A limited administrative fix can be practical for low-value assets or when all interested parties agree that the item belongs to the trust. In such cases, pursuing a formal court declaration may not be cost-effective. The trustee can often gather straightforward supporting documents and work directly with institutions to retitle assets. Even so, the trustee should keep clear records of actions taken and be mindful that future disputes could arise if beneficiaries later question whether the transfer was proper. Documentation and transparent communication with beneficiaries help minimize such risk.
When heirs or creditors contest ownership, or when title history is unclear, a formal Heggstad petition may be the most reliable method to obtain legal clarity. A court order can resolve disputes definitively and provide a legal record that institutions and future parties can rely on. Preparing a petition involves gathering convincing evidence, meeting notice requirements, and presenting legal arguments in court. This process is designed to address contested situations where administrative fixes are unlikely to succeed or where the possibility of future litigation requires a strong legal foundation.
For substantial assets such as real property, sizable investment accounts, or items with convoluted title records, pursuing a Heggstad petition can protect beneficiary interests and preserve the trust’s intended distributions. Complex ownership histories may require forensic documentation, appraisals, or corporate and bank records to prove the decedent’s intent, and a court order creates a permanent legal resolution. When large values are at stake, the benefits of judicial determination often outweigh the costs and time involved in filing a petition and obtaining a formal declaration.
A comprehensive, court-based approach yields a definitive legal determination about asset ownership. This removes ambiguity for trustees, institutions, and beneficiaries and reduces the chance of later challenges. A court order can be recorded where appropriate, simplifying future transactions and giving trustees the authority to transfer, manage, or distribute assets as the trust directs. For families in Martinez, a judicial ruling can preserve the integrity of the estate plan and provide peace of mind by ensuring the decedent’s wishes are honored and that distributions follow the trust terms without further dispute.
Beyond clarity, a Heggstad order can expedite administration by enabling trustees to access and manage assets squarely within the trust framework. Lenders, title companies, and financial institutions are more likely to accept a court order than informal affidavits, particularly for high-value assets. This reduces administrative friction and can lower long-term costs related to contested transfers. Pursuing a thorough legal route also helps create a complete record that future trustees and beneficiaries can rely on to avoid repeated legal questions about the same assets.
One key benefit of securing a court declaration is obtaining clear title for assets that should have been in the trust. With a formal order, trustees can record the judgment where required and present it to financial institutions or title companies to effect transfers. Clear title facilitates sales, distributions, and management of trust property without the lingering concern that an asset might later be removed from trust administration. This clarity simplifies long-term trust management and helps trustees fulfill their duties in accordance with the trust document.
A judicial determination significantly reduces the chance of subsequent challenges to ownership because the court has already resolved the question. Future parties, including heirs and creditors, will face the court order as authoritative evidence of trust ownership. This legal finality can prevent costly and protracted disputes down the road, protecting beneficiaries and trustees alike. By obtaining a definitive ruling, families gain confidence that the trust administration will proceed according to the decedent’s plan and that one contested asset will not spawn repeated legal battles.
Start by assembling all relevant documents such as the trust instrument, any drafts, transfer instructions, deeds, bank statements, and beneficiary designations. Witnessed notes, emails, or letters that show the decedent’s intent are particularly helpful. Detailed documentation reduces uncertainty and strengthens a petition by allowing the court to trace the decedent’s plan. Organize records chronologically and prepare concise declarations explaining how each document relates to the intended trust transfer to help the court and interested parties understand the full context.
Plan for the time it will take to gather evidence, prepare declarations, and meet court scheduling. Some institutions take time to produce records, and obtaining appraisals or title reports may be necessary. Be realistic about timelines and prepare a complete packet for filing to minimize continuances. Anticipate potential objections and assemble testimony or corroborating documents ahead of time. Strategic preparation can shorten hearings and increase the likelihood of a favorable, timely resolution in the probate court.
Families commonly pursue Heggstad petitions when they discover assets that were clearly intended to be part of a trust but remain titled in the decedent’s name. Reasons include preventing assets from entering general probate, ensuring distributions follow the trust terms, and providing a formal court record that clarifies ownership. When heirs and beneficiaries want certainty and a streamlined administration, the petition offers a legal mechanism to place the asset under trust authority. This helps trustees manage the trust as intended and protects beneficiaries from future disputes over the same asset.
Other reasons to consider the petition include resolving title defects that impede sales or transfers, obtaining authority to access accounts, and ensuring institutions will recognize the trustee’s control. A Heggstad order may also limit creditor claims that hinge on ownership questions and prevent inconsistent treatment of assets across different institutions. For those administering trusts in Contra Costa County, the petition is often a practical solution to reconcile paperwork oversights and to preserve the integrity of an estate plan without resorting to full probate when that outcome is avoidable.
Typical circumstances include real property retained in a decedent’s name due to oversight, recently created trusts where transfers were incomplete, accounts with beneficiary designations that conflict with trust terms, and assets held in the name of a deceased person due to timing issues. Other scenarios involve transfers that failed because of title errors or institutional refusal to accept informal affidavits. When such situations arise, the petition can clarify ownership and align asset treatment with the trust’s instructions, helping trustees carry out distributions properly.
Real estate is a frequent subject of Heggstad petitions when deeds were never executed or recorded in the trust’s name. This can happen if the trust was created shortly before death or if the property owner intended to retitle but did not complete the transaction. The petition can present the trust document, prior deeds, and related communications to show intent. If the court agrees, the judge issues an order recognizing the property as trust-owned and instructing how title should be handled to reflect the trust’s provisions.
Financial accounts sometimes remain in the decedent’s name because of conflicting beneficiary designations or institution policies that prevent quick transfers. In these cases, bank statements, account applications, and trustee declarations can demonstrate the decedent’s plan to include the accounts in the trust. The probate court can then rule that the accounts are trust assets so the trustee may access them for administration and distribution. Resolving these matters through a petition often avoids confusion and helps ensure funds are used according to the trust.
Sometimes transfers were attempted but paperwork was incomplete, lost, or inconsistent. Missing deeds, partial assignments, or ambiguous transfer forms create uncertainty about whether property vested in the trust. A Heggstad petition allows the court to evaluate the evidence and determine whether the decedent intended the asset to be trust property. By clarifying ownership, the court helps trustees proceed with administration and distribution, while also creating a recorded ruling that can be used to update relevant records and reduce the risk of future disputes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist residents of Martinez and Contra Costa County with Heggstad petitions and related trust administration issues. We help trustees and beneficiaries understand available options, gather and organize supporting documents, and navigate local probate court procedures. Our goal is to obtain clear legal resolution for assets intended to be in a trust so administration can proceed smoothly. If you face title discrepancies or uncertainty about asset ownership after a trustmaker’s death, we can explain next steps and prepare the materials the court is likely to require.
Choosing representation for a Heggstad petition means selecting a team that understands probate court practices in Contra Costa County and the documentation typically needed to prove intent. We focus on meticulous preparation of petitions and exhibits, clear communication with all interested parties, and practical solutions for resolving title issues. Our approach emphasizes minimizing family conflict, anticipating common objections, and working toward an efficient court resolution that supports the trustee’s ability to manage the trust according to its terms.
We assist with compiling records, drafting declarations, and coordinating with institutions to secure necessary documents. This includes preparing accurate notices and ensuring compliance with procedural rules to avoid delays. When court hearings are required, we present the factual and legal foundation clearly to the judge to seek a favorable order. Throughout the process, we prioritize transparent billing and realistic timelines so clients in Martinez can make informed decisions about their next steps in administering a trust.
Our services also include advising trustees on post-order tasks, such as recording the court order, updating title records, and assisting institutions that require copies of the judgment. We work to protect beneficiary interests while managing relations with financial institutions, title companies, and other parties involved. This helps ensure that once an order is obtained, assets are properly placed under the trust and administered in accordance with the decedent’s wishes, reducing future uncertainty and legal exposure.
Our process begins with a careful intake to identify the assets in question and to review the trust document and supporting records. We then advise on whether an administrative transfer might suffice or whether a Heggstad petition is advisable. If court action is needed, we prepare the petition and required exhibits, manage notice and service to interested parties, and coordinate filings with the probate court in Contra Costa County. We help prepare witnesses and declarations and represent clients at hearings to seek a clear judicial determination of trust ownership.
The initial stage involves a thorough assessment of the trust document, deeds, account records, and any communications indicating the decedent’s intent. We identify potential evidence gaps and request additional records from institutions when necessary. Clear organization and early collection of materials allow us to determine the likely strength of a petition and whether alternative administrative remedies might work. This phase sets the groundwork for a focused filing that anticipates the court’s evidentiary expectations and streamlines subsequent steps in the process.
We analyze the trust instrument and compare it with title records, deeds, and account registrations to identify inconsistencies. This review clarifies which assets were intended for the trust and which remain titled in the decedent’s name. We look for written transfer instructions, prior drafts, or other documentation that supports intent and prepare a checklist of required exhibits. Identifying these issues early helps determine the scope of the petition and whether additional investigation or corrective documents are needed before filing.
After identifying relevant assets, we request records from banks, title companies, and brokers, and prepare declarations from trustees or witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s intent. These declarations typically explain the context and provide a narrative linking documents to the trustmaker’s plan. Well-prepared declarations and organized exhibits support the petition’s factual assertions and help the court reach a clear conclusion about trust ownership without unnecessary delay or frequent continuances.
Once the petition and exhibits are prepared, we file them with the probate court and serve notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested persons. Proper service is essential to prevent later challenges and to allow the court to proceed on schedule. We prepare declarations of service and respond to any procedural inquiries from the court. If no objections are filed, the court may grant the petition on the submitted papers or schedule a hearing to address any unresolved issues raised by interested parties.
We draft a petition that clearly states the facts, identifies the assets at issue, and attaches supporting exhibits such as the trust, deeds, account records, and witness declarations. Clarity and organization are important so the judge and opposing parties can easily assess the basis for the request. Each exhibit is indexed and referenced within the petition, and we prepare a detailed table of contents to simplify the court’s review and reduce the likelihood of questions that could delay the matter.
We ensure that all required interested parties receive proper notice according to California probate rules and file proof of service with the court. When objections are filed, we evaluate the merits and discuss potential resolutions, which can include negotiated stipulations or contested hearings. Our goal is to resolve disputes efficiently while protecting trustee and beneficiary interests. Timely communication with all parties and accurate proof of notice are essential to maintain momentum toward a final court ruling.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the factual and legal basis for treating the asset as trust property, relying on declarations and documentary exhibits. Following the hearing, if the court finds the evidence persuasive, it issues an order declaring the property part of the trust. We then assist with post-order tasks such as recording the judgment, notifying financial institutions, and effectuating transfers. Ensuring institutions accept and implement the order is a critical final step in completing the transition of the asset to the trust.
At hearing, a concise presentation of documentary evidence and sworn declarations helps the judge evaluate intent and the chain of title. We organize exhibits and prepare declarants to testify if needed, focusing on the most persuasive records. Clear argumentation emphasizes the trustmaker’s plan and explains any gaps in paperwork. The hearing is an opportunity to secure a judicial declaration that resolves the ownership question, and effective preparation often determines how quickly the court can reach a final ruling.
After the court issues an order, the next steps include recording the order where required, presenting it to banks or title companies, and completing any deeds or transfers directed by the judgment. We follow up with institutions to ensure they recognize and implement the order, and we advise trustees on documenting the transfer within trust records. Completing these administrative tasks reliably closes the loop on the petition and places the asset squarely under trust control for distribution according to the trust terms.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that certain assets belong to a trust even though the assets remain titled in the decedent’s name. The petition is used to provide legal confirmation that the trustmaker intended those assets to be part of the trust, allowing the trustee to manage and distribute them according to the trust terms. The court examines documentary evidence and declarations to determine whether the preponderance of evidence supports treating the asset as trust property. This legal clarity helps trustees and institutions act consistently with the trust’s directives. The petition is particularly useful when titles are unclear, when institutions decline to accept informal transfers, or when heirs may later dispute ownership. A court order resulting from a successful petition can be recorded where appropriate and presented to financial institutions or title companies to effect transfers. The formal judicial route reduces the likelihood of future challenges and helps preserve the integrity of the estate plan by aligning asset treatment with the trustmaker’s intentions.
A Heggstad petition becomes necessary when administrative fixes are impractical or when there is a risk of disagreement about ownership. If banks or title companies will not accept corrective documents, or if heirs or creditors might challenge an informal transfer, seeking a court declaration provides a definitive resolution. The petition is also appropriate for high-value assets where a formal order offers stronger assurance that the asset will be treated consistent with the trust and less likely to be contested later. However, a simple transfer may be sufficient when institutions accept a certified trust, death certificate, and trustee declaration without court involvement, and when all interested parties agree. Choosing the administrative path can save time and expense in straightforward cases. Evaluating whether to pursue a petition depends on institution policies, the value and complexity of the asset, and the likelihood of disputes among beneficiaries or heirs.
Courts give weight to the trust document itself and to contemporaneous records that indicate the trustmaker intended the asset to be part of the trust. Deeds, account change forms, emails, and draft documents that reference transfers are persuasive, as are signed instructions or notes showing the decedent asked for assets to be placed in the trust. Witness declarations from individuals who observed the trustmaker’s intent or who participated in transfer efforts can provide necessary context and corroboration. Clear links between the asset and the trust, such as prior attempts to retitle property, consistent beneficiary designations, or communications requesting transfers, strengthen a petition. The more complete and organized the documentary record, the more readily a court can reach a conclusion without extended dispute. Preparation of detailed declarations that explain how each exhibit supports the claim is often decisive in resolving ownership questions.
Timing varies depending on court calendars, whether interested parties object, and the complexity of the evidence. In Contra Costa County, an uncontested petition may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months if all documents are in order and no hearing becomes necessary. When a hearing is required or objections are filed, the process may take several months, and scheduling depends on the court’s availability and on how quickly parties prepare responses and evidence. Gathering bank records, title reports, and witness declarations can add time before filing, so early preparation helps shorten the overall timeline. Prompt and accurate compliance with notice and service requirements also prevents delays. Expect some variability in timing, and plan accordingly for the needs of trust administration while the petition is pending.
A Heggstad order primarily clarifies ownership and does not itself create new creditor claims, but it can affect how assets are treated in relation to existing claims. If creditors have valid claims against the decedent’s probate estate, a court determination that certain assets belong to the trust may limit the estate’s available assets for satisfying those claims. Tax consequences depend on the nature of the asset and the timing of transfers; obtaining a declaration of trust ownership does not typically change prior tax obligations but may affect administration and reporting requirements going forward. Trustees should evaluate creditor notice requirements and consult with tax professionals if large or complex assets are involved. Maintaining transparent records and providing required notices helps manage obligations while the petition proceeds. The court’s order provides a legal basis to manage the asset under trust provisions, but trustees should remain mindful of any outstanding liabilities or tax considerations tied to the asset.
Yes, beneficiaries and heirs may challenge a Heggstad petition by filing objections with the probate court. Common challenges question whether the decedent actually intended the asset to be part of the trust or argue that documentation is insufficient. When objections are filed, the court may schedule a hearing where both sides present evidence and testimony. Resolving objections often involves additional declarations, discovery of records, or negotiation to reach a settlement that avoids prolonged litigation. In many cases, transparent communication and early engagement with concerned parties can reduce the likelihood of formal disputes. If objections remain, the court will weigh the evidence and issue a ruling based on whether the petitioner has demonstrated the decedent’s intent. Preparing thorough supporting materials and witness statements helps address potential challenges and increases the chance of a favorable judicial determination.
Institutions sometimes refuse informal transfers due to internal policies, risk concerns, or regulatory requirements. Banks and title companies must ensure compliance with account agreements, deed formalities, and anti-fraud protections, so they may insist on a court order before transferring ownership. Complex ownership histories, missing signatures, or inconsistent beneficiary designations can trigger institutional reluctance. Each institution has different thresholds for accepting trustee declarations or certified copies of trusts without court involvement. When institutions decline informal documentation, a Heggstad petition provides a judicially sanctioned directive that most institutions will accept. Preparing a petition with clear supporting evidence addresses institutional concerns and often overcomes procedural barriers. Engaging with institutions early to learn their requirements can guide how to structure the petition and what additional documentation may be necessary to resolve title issues.
Recording a Heggstad order can be effective to change public title records for real property and is often sufficient to update deeds and clarify ownership in the county recorder’s office. For financial accounts, presenting the court order to the institution typically leads to acceptance and transfer of the asset into the trust. The order serves as authoritative proof that a judge has determined the asset belongs to the trust, and institutions generally comply with such directives once the order is properly authenticated and provided with necessary supporting documents. Some follow-up steps may still be needed depending on the asset type, such as executing a new deed or completing institutional transfer forms. Trustees should keep copies of the judgment, proof of recording, and any correspondence with institutions to document compliance. After implementing the order, confirm that the asset appears under the trust’s ownership in all relevant records to prevent future confusion or disputes.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the matter, court fees, and whether the petition is contested. Court filing fees are generally modest, but costs can increase with the need for expert valuations, title searches, or extended litigation. When matters are uncontested and documentation is straightforward, total costs may remain limited; when disputes require additional discovery or a contested hearing, fees can rise accordingly. Counsel fees reflect time spent preparing petitions, gathering exhibits, and representing clients in court. Discussing budget and potential costs early in the process helps set expectations. We aim to provide transparent fee estimates based on initial case assessment and to identify opportunities to reduce expense by pursuing administrative transfers when appropriate. Each case is different, so obtaining a tailored estimate after document review is the best way to anticipate total costs.
While a Heggstad petition is pending, trustees should continue performing routine trust administration consistent with the trust terms, keeping clear records of actions taken and any funds disbursed for necessary expenses. They should avoid distributions that would contradict the purpose of the petition or diminish disputed assets. Maintaining transparent communication with beneficiaries and providing updates about the petition helps manage expectations and reduce the likelihood of surprise objections during court proceedings. Trustees should also preserve evidence, maintain custody of relevant documents, and respond promptly to requests for information related to the petition. If institutions require temporary measures, such as limited access to funds for essential expenses, trustees should document authorizations and consult with counsel about the safest course of action pending court resolution. Careful recordkeeping during this period protects the trustee and supports the petition before the court.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas