A Heggstad petition can be an essential tool for heirs and trustees when a trustmaker dies leaving assets titled in the decedent’s name instead of the trust. In Orinda and across Contra Costa County, families and fiduciaries face timing, probate exposure, and asset transfer issues that a well-drafted petition can resolve. This introduction explains how Heggstad petitions are used to ask a probate court to recognize and transfer property to a trust, helping avoid full probate administration in many cases. The following sections outline what to expect, when to consider a petition, and practical steps for moving assets into the trust efficiently and responsibly.
Many clients come to us unsure whether a Heggstad petition is the right path or whether formal probate is unavoidable. The petition process can be preferable when the paperwork shows clear intent that trust assets were meant to be held by the trust and simply were not retitled. This overview summarizes common scenarios, necessary documentation, likely timelines, and potential outcomes in Contra Costa County courts. Readers will gain a practical sense of how a Heggstad petition can simplify post-death administration, answer common legal questions, and preserve family resources and privacy by steering clear of unnecessary probate proceedings when appropriate.
A Heggstad petition offers important benefits for beneficiaries and fiduciaries seeking to place assets into a trust after the trustmaker has passed away. The petition provides a judicial declaration that property titled in the decedent’s name should be treated as trust property, helping avoid the time and expense of a full probate administration. It can also preserve family privacy, reduce court oversight, and speed distributions. The process typically requires proof of the trust and evidence of the trustmaker’s intent, but when properly supported it often leads to a straightforward court order allowing successor trustees to take control of assets for trust beneficiaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Contra Costa County and Bay Area communities, including Orinda, focusing on practical results in estate planning and trust matters. Our approach emphasizes clear communication and careful preparation of petitions and supporting documents. We work with trustees, family members, and fiduciaries to gather necessary records, prepare declarations, and present a petition that demonstrates the decedent’s intent to have the asset governed by the trust. The goal is to secure timely court recognition so trustees can manage and distribute trust property without prolonged administration or unnecessary expense.
A Heggstad petition is a special probate filing used to ask a California court to confirm that certain property should be distributed according to a trust rather than through probate. This process is typically pursued when assets remain titled in the decedent’s name because of oversight, incomplete transfers, or changes in asset ownership prior to death. The petition requires documentary proof such as the trust instrument, death certificate, and relevant account statements or deeds. Successful petitions allow trustees to take control of the assets, reducing delay and cost compared to opening a full probate estate, and can protect privacy since trust administration generally avoids the public probate record.
Filing a Heggstad petition involves assembling a coherent record that links the asset to the trustmaker’s intent and the trust terms. Courts look for evidence that the trust existed, that the decedent intended the property to be held by the trust, and that the trustee is authorized to receive the asset. The process can also address conflicting title issues or incomplete beneficiary designations. Although not every situation qualifies, many families find that a properly documented petition resolves matters more quickly than full probate. The following sections outline definitions, key elements, and how the firm assists clients from initial review through the court’s order.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court request to treat assets that remained in a decedent’s name as trust property because the decedent intended the trust to control those assets. It is grounded in California law that recognizes a trustmaker’s intent and allows courts to effect transfers consistent with that intent, even when legal title was not updated before death. The petition typically includes the trust instrument, affidavits or declarations about the trustmaker’s intent, and documentation showing the asset’s connection to the trust. If the court grants the petition, the trustee receives authority to manage or distribute the asset under the trust terms.
A successful Heggstad petition commonly requires certain core elements: a valid trust instrument, evidence of the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust, proof of death, clear identification of the asset, and the trustee’s authority under the trust. The process includes gathering documents, preparing detailed declarations, serving notice to heirs and interested parties, and filing the petition with the appropriate probate court. Hearings may be required if objections arise, and orders will vary based on the facts. Our process focuses on thorough documentation and timely filing to improve the likelihood of a favorable court determination.
Understanding key legal terms can help clients navigate the petition process with greater confidence. Terms such as trust instrument, trustee, successor trustee, probate, decedent’s estate, and beneficiary commonly appear in petitions and supporting pleadings. Familiarity with these concepts helps trustees assemble the right documentation and anticipate court requirements. This glossary provides plain-language definitions and context for how each term fits into a Heggstad petition, including why particular records matter and how they support the petition’s legal arguments in Contra Costa County courts.
The trust instrument is the written document that creates the trust and sets out its terms, including the identity of the trustmaker, successor trustees, and beneficiaries. In a Heggstad petition, the trust instrument is essential because it demonstrates the trustmaker’s intent and the trustee’s authority to receive and administer the asset. The document may also include provisions for distribution and administration that the court will consider when determining whether to treat the property as trust property after the trustmaker’s death. A complete, signed, and dated trust instrument strengthens a petition considerably.
A successor trustee is the person or entity named in the trust instrument to manage trust assets after the trustmaker’s death or incapacity. For a Heggstad petition, identifying and documenting the successor trustee’s authority is necessary so the court can issue an order directing assets to that trustee. Proof typically includes the trust language naming the successor trustee, any acceptance of the role, and contact information. Establishing the successor trustee’s legal standing ensures the court’s order can be implemented efficiently and that assets are handled according to the trust’s terms.
The term decedent refers to the person who has passed away and whose assets are at issue in the petition. Confirming the decedent’s identity and date of death through a death certificate is a routine and necessary step in filing a Heggstad petition. The court needs clear evidence that the trustmaker is deceased to grant authority for successor trustees to act. Documentation may also include the decedent’s financial records and title documents that help connect specific assets to the intentions expressed in the trust instrument.
A probate court order is a formal judicial decree that can direct transfers of assets, recognize trustee authority, or resolve disputes among interested parties. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the court order formally acknowledges that specific property should be treated as trust property and authorizes the trustee to take control. This order is often narrower than an order opening a full probate estate and can therefore limit notice and administration requirements, saving time and expense. The content of the order depends on the evidence submitted and whether any objections were raised.
Choosing between filing a Heggstad petition and opening a full probate administration depends on the assets involved, the quality of documentation, and whether interested parties agree on the transfer. A Heggstad petition can be faster and less costly when the facts clearly show the asset belongs to the trust, while probate may be necessary for contested estates or unclear title issues. This comparison examines typical timelines, cost considerations, public versus private processes, and scenarios where one path is more practical than the other. The right decision balances legal risk, cost, and the family’s need for prompt access to assets.
A limited petition is often sufficient when the trust instrument is complete and there is clear documentary evidence linking specific assets to the trustmaker’s intent. Account statements, deeds, beneficiary designations, and correspondence that show an intent to transfer property into the trust make a targeted petition more effective. When heirs and beneficiaries are in agreement and no complex creditor claims or disputes exist, courts are more likely to grant a petition without opening full probate. This approach can reduce cost and delay while ensuring assets pass according to the trustmaker’s intentions.
When beneficiaries and potential heirs do not contest the conversion of assets into the trust, a targeted petition can proceed more smoothly. Courts favor practical solutions that honor the trustmaker’s documented wishes and avoid unnecessary litigation where interests align. In such circumstances, providing clear notice and standard documentation can allow the trustee to obtain an order promptly. This path helps families avoid long court backlogs and can spare them the expense and publicity of a full probate administration when parties are cooperative.
A comprehensive review is important when title problems, potential creditor claims, or disputes over the trustmaker’s intent could complicate a Heggstad petition. Where an asset’s ownership is disputed, or there are unresolved debts, courts may require detailed evidence or prefer probate administration. A careful analysis of account history, transfer timing, and any encumbrances helps determine the appropriate legal strategy. The goal of a full review is to anticipate objections, reduce the risk of later challenges, and protect trustees and beneficiaries from liability while ensuring that the asset disposition aligns with applicable law.
When beneficiaries or heirs disagree about whether an asset should pass through the trust, a comprehensive approach helps prepare for hearings and potential contested litigation. Detailed declarations, corroborating documents, and careful legal argumentation are often needed to persuade a court that the trustmaker’s intent is clear and that the trustee’s proposed action is lawful. In such cases, a broader plan may include negotiation, mediation, or litigation strategy to resolve disputes efficiently while protecting the trust’s assets and the rights of the beneficiaries.
Taking a comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition can shorten court process time by preempting common objections and ensuring all necessary documentation is included at filing. Thorough preparation reduces the likelihood of continuances, additional discovery, or supplemental filings that can delay an outcome. It also helps trustees exercise their duties with confidence after receiving an order, because the record supports the trustee’s authority. A complete record preserves family resources and limits the potential for later challenge to transfers that were intended to be governed by the trust.
Another benefit of comprehensive preparation is better protection against creditor claims and procedural missteps that could otherwise jeopardize assets. By assessing creditor exposure, reviewing beneficiary interests, and confirming the trust’s terms, a careful filing aims to produce a robust court order granting trustee powers to manage and distribute property. This methodical approach supports orderly trust administration, reduces stress for trustees and heirs, and aligns the outcome with the trustmaker’s documented intentions, providing a stable foundation for post-death management of the estate.
A carefully prepared petition can significantly reduce delay by eliminating the need for back-and-forth with the court and by addressing common procedural objections in advance. Trustees benefit from a smoother administrative path once an order is entered, allowing them to focus on managing and distributing assets rather than litigation. This can translate into lower overall costs and less emotional stress for family members. Timely resolution also helps preserve asset values that might otherwise decline during prolonged proceedings and ensures beneficiaries receive distributions sooner.
When a petition is supported by thorough documentation and careful legal argument, the resulting order is harder to challenge after entry. A strong record showing the trustmaker’s intent and the trustee’s authority reduces opportunities for parties to reopen matters later. That protection benefits beneficiaries by promoting finality in administration and helps trustees avoid personal liability disputes. The peace of mind that comes from a well-documented proceeding is an important advantage for families seeking efficient and predictable trust settlement.
Begin by collecting the trust instrument, death certificate, deeds, account statements, and any beneficiary designations that relate to the asset at issue. Careful organization reduces the time needed to prepare declarations and makes showing the court a clear chain of evidence simpler and more persuasive. Early organization also allows trustees to spot discrepancies, such as inconsistent account names or missing signatures, that may otherwise cause delays. By preparing this paperwork before filing, the trustee ensures a smoother petition process and a stronger record to support the requested court order.
Provide proper notice to heirs and other interested parties in a timely fashion to minimize disputes and meet statutory requirements. Early communication can resolve misunderstandings and encourage cooperation, which often leads to uncontested petitions and shorter court timelines. If concerns arise, respond with clear documentation and consider negotiation or alternative dispute resolution to avoid protracted litigation. Prompt, transparent communication establishes trust among parties and demonstrates to the court that the trustee is acting responsibly in the administration of the trust.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets that should have been retitled into a trust remain in the decedent’s name and the trustmaker’s intent is documented. This situation commonly arises when transfers were overlooked, financial institutions failed to update titles, or the trustmaker handled assets informally near the end of life. Filing the petition may be preferable to full probate when the evidence supporting the trust’s control of property is strong and interested parties are cooperative. The petition can restore intended trust distributions with less expense and public disclosure than probate.
Also consider a Heggstad petition when quick access to assets is needed to pay bills, maintain property, or continue trust investments. The petition can provide the legal authority for a trustee to act on behalf of the trust, enabling asset management and distribution consistent with the trust terms. When time-sensitive needs exist and documentation supports the trustmaker’s intent, a properly prepared petition can be an effective tool for enabling trustees to perform necessary administrative tasks without waiting for lengthy probate proceedings.
Typical circumstances include assets left titled in the decedent’s individual name, bank accounts that were never retitled, real property still in the decedent’s name, or retirement plan and insurance arrangements with inconsistent beneficiary designations. Other cases involve last-minute acquisitions that were not placed into the trust or mistakes when changing account ownership. When the trust instrument clearly indicates the asset should be part of the trust, a Heggstad petition often provides the appropriate legal remedy to transfer the asset without full probate administration.
Real estate frequently remains in the decedent’s name due to administrative oversight or incomplete title transfers. In that situation, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize the property as held by the trustmaker for the trust, allowing the successor trustee to record a deed and manage or sell the property in accordance with the trust. Preparing deeds, title reports, and trust documents that show intent and the trustee’s authority is central to a successful petition and helps prevent unnecessary delay in settling real property matters.
Bank or investment accounts sometimes remain in the decedent’s name rather than being retitled to the trust, leaving funds inaccessible to the successor trustee. A Heggstad petition can secure a court order that allows the trustee to collect and manage those funds for trust beneficiaries. Documents such as account statements, beneficiary designations, and letters from financial institutions can support the petition. Resolving these accounts through a petition can avoid the time and expense of full probate and return funds to beneficiaries more quickly.
Retirement plans and life insurance policies can present complications when beneficiary designations conflict with trust provisions or when records are ambiguous. A Heggstad petition may be used when the trustmaker’s intent supports transferring benefits to the trust and the paperwork can be marshaled to show that intent. Coordination with plan administrators and presentation of clear evidence help courts assess whether a petition is appropriate. Resolving such issues through a petition often avoids prolonged disputes and clarifies distribution paths for the benefit of heirs.
For residents of Orinda and surrounding Contra Costa County communities, local legal support can make the difference in navigating court procedures and filing requirements. We assist trustees and families by reviewing trust documents, collecting supporting records, preparing petitions, and handling court filings and service of notice. Familiarity with local court practices and timelines helps streamline the process and anticipate common administrative steps. Whether you are dealing with a single account or multiple assets, local representation ensures that filings comply with county rules and that the petition is presented clearly to the court.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers practical, client-focused assistance with Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters. We guide trustees through documentation gathering, petition drafting, and court procedures so they can exercise their duties responsibly. Our attorneys focus on achieving efficient resolutions that honor the trustmaker’s documented intent and reduce administrative burden on families. We strive to communicate clearly, set realistic expectations, and pursue the most effective legal path whether a targeted petition or a broader probate process is required.
Clients appreciate a responsive approach to complex post-death issues, including resolving title discrepancies and coordinating with financial institutions. Our team assists with preparing declarations, obtaining necessary estate records, and meeting notice requirements, all aimed at securing an enforceable court order that enables trustees to manage trust assets. We work collaboratively with clients to develop a strategy that considers timing, cost, and the family’s preferences, providing support throughout hearings and any necessary negotiations with interested parties.
Whether addressing a single account or a mixture of real property and financial assets, our firm focuses on clear documentation and efficient case management to deliver reliable results. We explain the likely outcomes, outline potential risks, and help trustees take the concrete steps needed to uphold the trustmaker’s intentions. For families in Orinda and the greater Bay Area, this pragmatic guidance helps reduce uncertainty and moves the process forward in a manner consistent with the trust’s provisions and California law.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and document review to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate for your situation. We gather trust instruments, asset documentation, and the decedent’s death certificate, then draft a petition and supporting declarations. After serving appropriate notice to interested parties we file with the probate court and address any inquiries or objections that arise. When an order is issued, we assist with implementing the transfer, including recording deeds or updating account titles, and provide follow-up support for trustee duties and distribution tasks.
The first step is a careful review of the trust document and any ownership records related to the asset at issue. We identify the trustee, beneficiaries, and any potential conflicts, and then request account statements, deeds, and correspondence that support the trustmaker’s intent. This stage includes evaluating creditor concerns and whether notice procedures are necessary. A solid foundation built at this early stage increases the likelihood of obtaining an order quickly and limits the need for supplemental filings or evidence later in the process.
We assemble the trust instrument, death certificate, title documents, and any other records demonstrating the relationship between the asset and the trust. This includes checking for beneficiary designations, account agreements, and communications that reflect the trustmaker’s intent. Where records are incomplete, we identify reasonable avenues to supplement the record, such as affidavits from persons with knowledge or institutional statements from banks. The objective is to present a coherent and persuasive factual record to the court at the time of filing.
Before filing we develop a strategy for serving required notices to heirs, beneficiaries, and any potential creditors. Proper notice is essential and must comply with statutory requirements to protect the resulting court order. We also evaluate whether an uncontested approach is feasible or whether additional steps will be needed if disagreement is likely. This planning prepares trustees for potential responses and helps avoid procedural missteps that could delay the court’s decision or necessitate additional filings.
After preparing documents and serving notice, we file the Heggstad petition with the appropriate probate court and monitor its progress. Clerks may request additional information or schedule a hearing if objections are raised. We handle all required filings, respond to requests from the court, and represent the trustee’s interests in any hearings. Our goal is to present a clear, legally supported case that enables the court to issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property and authorizing trustee action in accordance with the trust terms.
If interested parties object or the court requests more documentation, we prepare targeted responses with supporting evidence to address those concerns promptly. This may involve additional declarations, records from financial institutions, or clarification of trust provisions. Prompt, well-documented responses reduce the risk of prolonged litigation and increase the chance of a favorable ruling. We work to resolve disputes through reasoned legal argument and documentation wherever possible, while remaining prepared for hearings if issues cannot be resolved informally.
When a hearing is required, we present the petition and supporting documentation to the judge and respond to any questions or objections. If the court is satisfied that the asset should be treated as trust property, it will issue an order directing transfer to the trustee. The order’s scope depends on the evidence presented and any agreements among interested parties. Once entered, the order provides the trustee with the authority needed to manage or distribute the asset under the trust, subject to any conditions the court imposes.
After the court enters an order, we assist trustees with implementing the transfer: recording deeds, providing the order to financial institutions, retitling accounts, and completing administrative tasks necessary to manage trust assets. We also advise trustees on their ongoing duties, required accountings, and timelines for distributions under the trust. Proper implementation ensures that the court’s order achieves its intended effect and that trust beneficiaries receive assets according to the trust’s terms without further court involvement.
When real property is involved, the court order will typically be recorded with the county recorder to reflect the trustee’s authority to manage or dispose of the property. For financial accounts, we assist in presenting the order to institutions to change titles or release funds. Ensuring the recording and transfer steps are done correctly prevents future title problems and helps avoid disputes that could arise from improperly documented transfers. Accurate implementation protects the trust’s integrity and beneficiaries’ interests.
Once assets are collected and retitled, trustees may need to prepare accountings or follow distribution instructions under the trust. We guide trustees through preparing necessary reports and completing distributions in compliance with the trust terms. Assistance may include drafting notices to beneficiaries, calculating distributions, and ensuring tax and reporting requirements are addressed. Clear, careful handling at this stage helps bring the trust administration to a satisfactory close and minimizes the risk of post-administration disputes.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing asking the court to recognize property that remained in a decedent’s name as belonging to a trust because the decedent intended the trust to control that property. It is used when transfers into the trust were not completed prior to death, and the trustee needs legal authority to take possession and manage the asset. Courts consider the trust instrument, the decedent’s intent, and supporting documents that show the relationship between the asset and the trust. This remedy can be faster and less costly than a full probate administration when the facts clearly support treating the property as trust property. Filing requires preparing declarations, supporting records, and serving notice to interested parties. If the court is satisfied the trustmaker intended the asset for the trust, it will issue an order allowing the trustee to take control and manage the asset according to the trust terms.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the court’s calendar, the completeness of the documentation, and whether interested parties raise objections. In many uncontested cases, the process can take a few weeks to a few months from filing to order entry, depending on local court schedules. Preparing a complete petition with supporting evidence and correct notice often reduces delays and helps the matter proceed more quickly to a hearing and resolution. If disputes or procedural issues arise, the timeline can be extended by continuances, discovery, or required supplemental filings. Planning ahead, organizing documents thoroughly, and communicating with potential interested parties can reduce the likelihood of contested hearings and help obtain timely judicial relief that allows trustees to manage trust assets without unnecessary delay.
Common documents needed for a Heggstad petition include the trust instrument, a certified copy of the decedent’s death certificate, deeds or account statements showing asset ownership, and declarations or affidavits explaining the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Additional records like correspondence with financial institutions or past transfer paperwork can strengthen the petition by showing a consistent intent to fund the trust. The petition may also require identification of the trustee and beneficiaries, proof of notice to interested parties, and any supplemental evidence requested by the court. Ensuring these materials are organized and readily available at filing increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome and minimizes the need for further court requests for documentation.
Trustees should proceed cautiously before a Heggstad petition is granted, because acting without proper authority can expose trustees to personal liability. In urgent situations, courts sometimes allow temporary relief or expedited procedures to permit trustees to take necessary protective actions, but formal authority is typically required for substantial transfers or distributions. Gathering documentation and preparing the petition promptly helps secure the legal authorization trustees need to act on behalf of the trust. If immediate steps are necessary for asset preservation, trustees should consult with counsel to seek interim orders or other safeguards that protect the estate and beneficiaries while the petition is pending. Acting with appropriate legal authorization ensures trustees fulfill their duties and reduces the risk of future disputes or personal exposure.
A Heggstad petition can avoid a full probate administration for specific assets when clear evidence shows the trustmaker intended the property to be trust property. However, it may not resolve all probate issues in every case. Matters like creditor claims, disputed ownership for multiple assets, or complex estate situations may still require probate or additional court interventions. The petition is frequently effective for individual assets but does not automatically resolve every aspect of an estate that would otherwise be handled through probate. A careful assessment of the entire estate is necessary to determine whether a targeted petition is sufficient or whether broader probate administration is advisable. Evaluating asset types, creditor exposure, and beneficiary relationships helps identify the most cost-effective and legally appropriate path forward.
If someone objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objections and may require additional evidence, hearings, or procedural steps before ruling. Objections commonly raise questions about the trustmaker’s intent, asset ownership, or notice to interested parties. The court’s review will focus on whether the submitted documentation supports treating the property as part of the trust and whether statutory notice requirements were satisfied. Addressing objections promptly with supporting declarations, records, or clarification often resolves disputes without protracted litigation. Where objections persist, the matter may proceed to a contested hearing in which legal arguments and evidence determine whether the petition should be granted. Preparation and documentation are key to responding effectively to objections.
Filing a Heggstad petition involves court filing fees, potential publication or service costs, and legal fees for preparing the petition and supporting documentation. Fees vary by county and the nature of the case. When disputes arise, costs can increase due to additional filings, hearings, or discovery. Planning and thorough preparation can help manage expenses and reduce the likelihood of unexpected costs that arise from incomplete filings or avoidable objections. Many clients find that a targeted petition is less expensive than opening a full probate estate when the documentation is strong and parties are cooperative. Discussing potential fees and budgeting expectations in advance helps trustees and families make informed decisions about pursuing a petition versus alternative options.
Heggstad petitions can preserve more privacy than full probate because they allow specific assets to be resolved without opening an estate that becomes part of the public record in the same way. Probate files are generally public, which can reveal asset inventories and distributions. A targeted petition that limits court involvement to specific assets can reduce the exposure of personal financial details compared to a full probate proceeding. That said, petitions and court orders still become part of the public record to the extent they are filed with the court. When privacy is a concern, careful planning and prompt filing of accurate documentation can minimize unnecessary public disclosure while still securing the legal authority trustees need to manage trust assets.
Retirement accounts and life insurance policies may present particular challenges because beneficiary designations and plan rules sometimes control distribution regardless of trust provisions. A Heggstad petition can be appropriate when the record supports that the trustmaker intended benefits to flow to the trust and any plan administrators are willing to comply with a court order. Coordination with plan administrators and clear evidence of intent are critical to resolving these situations in favor of the trust when possible. Each account type has its own procedural requirements, and plan administrators may require a court order, beneficiary forms, or additional documentation. When designations conflict, a carefully prepared petition that addresses the plan’s procedures and the trustmaker’s intent provides the best chance of obtaining an order that allows benefits to be paid to or managed for the trust.
To reduce the need for a Heggstad petition later, take proactive steps now: retitle assets into the trust when it is created or when major transactions occur, update beneficiary designations to align with the trust, and maintain clear records showing the trustmaker’s intent. Regular reviews of account titles, deeds, and beneficiary forms help prevent assets from being left in the decedent’s name and reduce the likelihood of post-death transfer issues. Keeping an up-to-date estate plan, communicating with successor trustees about where documents are located, and obtaining confirmations from financial institutions that accounts have been retitled helps avoid the delays and costs associated with petitions. When changes are made, documenting those steps through correspondence and retention of confirmations creates a clearer record if questions arise later.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas