If you are considering changes to a trust created for a loved one or for your own estate plan, a trust modification petition may be necessary to adjust terms, correct errors, or reflect changed circumstances. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist clients throughout Contra Costa County, including Orinda, with clear guidance on when a court petition is required and how to prepare the record. This introductory overview explains what a trust modification petition involves, typical reasons people pursue modifications, and the general steps the process follows so you can make informed decisions about moving forward.
Many people assume trusts can simply be rewritten by their creators, but when a trust maker is deceased, incapacitated, or the trust terms require court approval, a trust modification petition is often the path to achieve necessary changes. This page describes how modifications differ from informal amendments, the kinds of changes courts commonly approve, and how family dynamics, successor trustee actions, and beneficiary rights factor into the process. We aim to clarify options and outline practical next steps for Orinda residents who need to update trust arrangements or resolve disputes related to trust administration.
A trust modification petition can preserve the intent of the trust while adapting to new circumstances, protect beneficiaries from unintended consequences, and correct drafting mistakes that create confusion or conflict. For families in Orinda, using the petition process can bring finality to disputed interpretations, ensure assets are distributed according to current wishes, and prevent prolonged estate administration issues. In some situations a court-approved modification is also necessary to allow trustees to use or reallocate trust assets lawfully. Ultimately, appropriate modifications reduce uncertainty and help the trust function as intended for beneficiaries and trustees alike.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across the Bay Area, with experience handling trust petitions, trust administration matters, and related estate planning documents. Our approach focuses on understanding each client’s objectives, reviewing trust instruments and related records, and preparing petitions that present facts clearly to the court. We work with trustees, beneficiaries, and family members to identify options that avoid unnecessary litigation when possible while protecting legal rights when court intervention is needed. Clients appreciate practical counsel tailored to California trust law and court procedures in Contra Costa County.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court to alter the terms of an existing trust or to resolve ambiguities that prevent proper administration. The petition typically sets out the trust’s background, the requested change, legal grounds for modification, and any notice provided to interested parties. Courts consider whether the proposed modification respects the trust maker’s intent and whether it is necessary or equitable under California law. The process includes filing, service on beneficiaries and other interested parties, potential responses, and a court hearing where the judge may grant, deny, or conditionally approve the requested relief.
There are different legal bases for seeking a modification, such as correcting typographical or drafting errors, addressing changed circumstances that frustrate the trust’s purpose, or satisfying conditions that no longer apply. In some cases, a trustee seeks clarification or authority to act when trust language is vague or silent on a particular issue. The court’s role is to balance fidelity to the trust document with fairness to beneficiaries and practical considerations for administration. Understanding these distinctions helps clients choose the appropriate procedural path and assemble supporting evidence for the petition.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing asking the probate court to change or interpret the terms of a trust instrument when informal amendment is impossible or inadequate. Common scenarios include where the grantor is deceased or incapacitated, where trust terms are internally inconsistent, or where a modification is needed to align trust operations with tax or regulatory considerations. The petition explains why the requested change is warranted, references relevant trust provisions, and proposes specific revised language or relief. Courts generally require notice to interested parties and will evaluate whether the requested modification aligns with the trust maker’s probable intent and applicable law.
Key elements of a successful petition include a clear statement of the facts, citation of the trust instrument and any related documents such as a certification of trust or pour-over will, a proposed order or revised provisions, and evidence supporting the need for change. The process typically involves preparing pleadings, serving beneficiaries and interested parties, responding to objections, and presenting the matter at a hearing. Where necessary, petitions may address issues like trustee authority, distribution adjustments, or asset transfers into a revised trust. Documentation such as trust amendments, financial records, and correspondence often supports the petition’s factual assertions.
Navigating trust modification requires familiarity with common estate planning concepts and procedural terms. Knowing what a revocable living trust, Heggstad petition, certification of trust, pour-over will, and guardianship nomination mean in practice helps clients understand options and potential consequences. This glossary section provides plain-language definitions of terms you are likely to encounter during the process, including distinctions between informal amendments and court-approved modifications. Being comfortable with these terms empowers trustees and beneficiaries to evaluate petitions, ask informed questions, and participate effectively in required court proceedings when necessary.
A revocable living trust is an estate planning tool created while a person is alive to hold assets for their benefit and to manage distribution after incapacitation or death. The trust maker typically retains the right to amend, revoke, or control trust assets during their lifetime. When changes are needed after the trust maker’s death or where the trust terms require court authorization, a modification petition may be necessary. Understanding how a revocable trust functions clarifies when informal updates are possible and when court action is required to achieve certain adjustments or to resolve ambiguities encountered during administration.
A Heggstad petition is a specific type of petition used in California to have property declared part of a trust despite not being formally titled in the name of the trust, often because of oversight or timing at death. This process can be useful when assets intended for the trust were unintentionally left in an individual’s name. The petition asks the court to recognize the asset as trust property so it can be administered and distributed according to the trust terms. Supporting proof typically includes contemporaneous estate planning documents and evidence of the grantor’s intent to fund the trust.
A certification of trust is a summary document that confirms the existence and essential terms of a trust without revealing private provisions. It is often used to prove to third parties, such as banks or title companies, that a trust exists and identify the trustee and trust powers. In modification or administration matters, a certification of trust can be attached to petitions or court filings to verify authority to act on behalf of the trust. This document streamlines interactions with institutions and assists the court in verifying who has standing to request or consent to changes.
A pour-over will functions alongside a trust by directing any assets not already transferred to the trust during the grantor’s lifetime into the trust upon death. While a pour-over will can help ensure intended assets ultimately enter the trust, probate of the will may be necessary to appoint the trustee and transfer assets. When trust modification petitions or other trust administration actions are pending, the interplay between a pour-over will and trust provisions can affect timing and required court approvals. Coordination of these documents is important for a smooth transition of assets into trust administration.
When trust adjustments are needed, options range from informal amendments and trustee actions to formal court petitions. If the trust maker is alive and holds amendment power, changes are typically handled privately. By contrast, after death or when the trust instrument limits unilateral amendments, court petitions provide a formal path to modify terms or clarify intent. Alternative remedies may include settlement agreements among beneficiaries or using existing trustee powers to resolve minor issues. Weighing the advantages and costs of each route helps clients choose the most practical and legally sound approach for their specific circumstances in Orinda and Contra Costa County.
Sometimes the trust document already grants trustees the authority to make certain adjustments without court involvement, such as reallocation of investments, discretionary distributions, or tax elections. When the desired change falls squarely within granted trustee powers and all interested parties agree, acting under those provisions can avoid court fees and delay. It remains important to document decisions carefully, provide notice where required, and keep clear records showing the trustee acted in accordance with the trust terms and fiduciary duties to beneficiaries to reduce the risk of later disputes.
When all beneficiaries and interested parties freely and knowingly consent to a modification, it may be possible to implement changes without formal litigation by preparing a written amendment or a settlement agreement that the trustee can rely upon. Written consents should be carefully drafted to reflect full understanding of implications, and the trust instrument should be reviewed to confirm whether consensus is adequate. Even where consent exists, obtaining a court order can provide finality, but a unanimous written agreement can be an efficient route when the parties prefer a private solution and the trust’s terms permit it.
When trust provisions are ambiguous, contradictory, or potentially hostile to the grantor’s intent, a comprehensive legal approach helps present a persuasive case to the court and protect beneficiary rights. Gathering relevant documents, obtaining testimony or declarations, and drafting a petition that anticipates likely objections can prevent procedural setbacks and reduce the risk of adverse rulings. In contested matters, careful preparation and a clear legal strategy support the best possible outcome while minimizing protracted litigation and uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries.
When modification requests arise after a grantor’s incapacity or death, or where substantial or unique assets are involved, court-approved modifications provide legal clarity and protection for fiduciaries handling the trust. Complex asset types, competing beneficiary claims, or tax implications may require detailed legal analysis and court oversight. A methodical approach ensures that the trustee’s actions comply with California law, that distributions honor the trust maker’s intent, and that any required transfers or declarations are properly documented to support future administration and avoid disputes.
Adopting a comprehensive approach to trust modification can reduce ambiguity, lower long-term dispute risk, and create a clear record of decisions made in the trust’s administration. When petitions are carefully prepared and supported by appropriate evidence, courts are more likely to grant requests that align with the trust maker’s intent. A full review of related estate planning documents such as pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and powers of attorney also helps align all instruments and prevent future inconsistencies or challenges that might otherwise arise during distribution or asset transfer.
A deliberate process also helps trustees demonstrate they fulfilled fiduciary duties and acted prudently for beneficiaries’ interests. Where negotiations among beneficiaries are feasible, a comprehensive approach can facilitate settlement and avoid protracted litigation. Additionally, when tax, creditor, or family law considerations are present, careful planning reduces unintended consequences. Overall, investing in thorough legal work up front often saves time, expense, and emotional strain compared with piecemeal or reactive measures later in the trust administration.
A full petition and supporting record provide clarity by explicitly stating the requested changes and the reasons behind them, which helps the court reach a definitive ruling. Legal finality minimizes the chance of subsequent litigation over the same issues and provides trustees and beneficiaries with confidence about how assets should be managed and distributed. Clear court orders or recorded documents mean that third parties, such as financial institutions or title companies, can rely on the resolution and follow the trust’s terms without ongoing uncertainty or repeated requests for verification.
When the court reviews and approves a modification, trustees receive the legal authority to act under the clarified or altered terms, which reduces exposure to claims of improper administration. Beneficiaries gain structured remedies if modifications would otherwise disadvantage them, and any approved changes become enforceable as court orders. This protection is especially important in situations with contested claims, unclear succession provisions, or complex assets. A robust process balances the interests of trustees and beneficiaries while aiming to uphold the trust maker’s original intentions as fairly as possible.
Start by assembling the trust instrument, any amendments, related wills such as a pour-over will, powers of attorney, certification of trust, and records showing asset ownership. Clear documentation that demonstrates intent, dates, and transfers will strengthen any petition. Financial statements, title documents, and correspondence that explain the grantor’s intentions can be especially useful. Early organization saves time, reduces costs, and helps identify whether a simple administrative path is feasible or whether a formal petition to the court is required to resolve discrepancies or effect requested changes in trust terms.
Timing can affect whether a modification is permissible and what consequences may follow. Changes after a grantor’s death may require probate coordination or affect tax reporting, while adjustments during incapacity may need conservatorship or court approval in some circumstances. Be mindful of potential tax, creditor, and creditor-notice issues that could arise from modifications, transfers, or re-titling of assets. A well-timed petition and properly structured revisions minimize hidden costs and help ensure that the modifications achieve the intended estate planning goals without unforeseen consequences.
Consider a trust modification petition when trust terms are unclear or contradictory, when assets intended for the trust were not properly funded, or when changed circumstances frustrate the trust’s purpose. If a trustee lacks authority to act in a way needed to manage or distribute trust assets, a petition can request judicial clarification or authorization. Other common triggers include errors in drafting, changes in family circumstances that affect distributions, or issues that affect the trust’s tax or creditor treatment. A petition helps align trust administration with legal requirements and practical realities.
A petition may also be appropriate when beneficiaries dispute the trust’s interpretation, when a Heggstad filing is needed to recognize assets as trust property, or when the trust needs modification to address newly discovered assets or liabilities. In many cases, seeking court approval provides the legal certainty trustees need to proceed and reduces the risk of subsequent challenges. For Orinda residents, evaluating whether informal solutions suffice or whether formal relief is necessary depends on the trust language, the presence of disagreement, and the importance of achieving a durable, enforceable resolution.
Frequent circumstances include discovery of assets not transferred into the trust, ambiguities in distribution provisions, conflicts among beneficiaries, mistakes in drafted terms, and changes in law or tax status that affect the trust’s operation. Situations involving beneficiaries with special needs, life insurance policies held outside the trust, or retirement accounts that were not properly titled also commonly lead to petitions. Identifying the root cause—whether administrative oversight, conflicting provisions, or changed circumstances—guides the appropriate remedy and whether to pursue a formal modification request to the court.
When a trust contains language that can be interpreted in multiple ways or when provisions conflict, trustees may need a court declaration to resolve how distributions should be made or which provisions control. Ambiguities can arise from outdated terms, poor drafting, or changes in family circumstances that the trust did not anticipate. A petition presenting the context, intent, and supporting evidence helps the court select the interpretation that best aligns with the trust maker’s probable intent while protecting beneficiaries’ rights and clarifying future administration duties for the trustee.
Assets intended to be part of a trust sometimes remain titled in an individual’s name due to oversight, complexity, or timing at death. When this occurs, a Heggstad petition or other court declaration may be necessary to have those assets treated as trust property for distribution purposes. Demonstrating intent through contemporaneous documents, beneficiary designations, and transfer attempts strengthens such petitions. Resolving these issues ensures the trust functions as planned and prevents assets from being distributed contrary to the trust maker’s wishes.
Life changes such as divorce, remarriage, a beneficiary’s financial hardship, or the need to provide for a beneficiary with special care requirements can prompt a request to modify trust terms. While some changes can be handled by trustee discretion, others require court-approved amendments to adjust distribution timing or amounts, create subtrusts like a special needs trust, or add protective provisions. A properly drafted petition explains why the modification promotes the trust maker’s intent and how it serves the best interests of beneficiaries while complying with applicable law.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists Orinda and Contra Costa County residents in evaluating whether a trust modification petition is necessary and in preparing the necessary pleadings and evidence. We work with trustees and beneficiaries to gather documentation, draft clear petitions, ensure required notices are provided, and represent clients at hearings when court involvement is required. Our goal is to achieve practical, legally sound outcomes that honor the trust maker’s intent and provide trustees with authority to administer the trust without ongoing uncertainty or exposure to later disputes.
Clients turn to our firm for thoughtful, methodical handling of trust modification matters, including detailed review of trust documents, coordination with financial institutions, and careful preparation of petitions and supporting declarations. We focus on clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, on documenting the factual record that supports requested changes, and on pursuing resolutions that minimize time and expense while protecting legal rights. Whether the matter is straightforward or involves disagreements among parties, our team aims to guide clients through each procedural step with realistic expectations and practical solutions.
We prioritize early evaluation to determine whether informal amendments, written consents, or formal petitions are most appropriate for the circumstances. For petitions that proceed to court, we prepare filings that anticipate likely concerns and seek to resolve matters as efficiently as possible. Our approach includes coordinating with accountants, fiduciaries, or other advisers when tax or administrative issues arise, and explaining the implications of each option so clients can make informed decisions that protect beneficiaries and trustees over the long term.
When matters involve assets that require transfer or retitling, beneficiary disagreements, or complex family dynamics, careful handling reduces the risk of delays and liability for trustees. We also assist with related estate planning needs such as updating pour-over wills, preparing certifications of trust, and ensuring HIPAA authorizations and guardianship nominations are consistent with the trust plan. Our goal is to create a coordinated approach so that trust modifications and related documents work together to achieve durable and enforceable results.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust and related estate planning documents to identify the specific issue and determine whether a petition is the correct path. We gather supporting evidence, draft the petition and proposed order, and prepare notices for interested parties. If the matter proceeds to court, we represent clients at hearings and work to resolve objections or negotiate settlements where appropriate. Throughout, we strive to communicate clearly about timing, potential outcomes, and practical steps trustees and beneficiaries should take to protect assets and legal rights.
During the initial phase we review the trust document, any amendments, related wills and powers of attorney, and evidence of asset ownership. We identify any ambiguities, conflicting provisions, or missing assets that may require a petition. Gathering declarations, correspondence, and financial records at the outset helps us assess legal grounds for modification and the information needed to support the request. Clear documentation at this stage reduces later discovery needs and helps shape a focused, persuasive petition for the court to consider.
A careful review of the trust instrument, amendment history, and accompanying estate planning documents reveals how the trust maker intended assets to be handled and where discrepancies may exist. We look for standard provisions, discretionary powers granted to trustees, and any clauses that might limit amendments or require notice. Identifying these elements early allows us to tailor the petition to present supporting facts and legal arguments that align with the trust’s structure and the grantor’s likely intent, improving the chance of a favorable court ruling.
Collecting supporting evidence such as declarations from the trustee, beneficiaries, or third parties who can attest to the grantor’s intent strengthens the petition. We also obtain financial records, title documents, beneficiary designation forms, and any correspondence that clarifies the grantor’s actions. These materials help demonstrate why a modification is appropriate and show that proposed changes reflect the grantor’s intentions. Proper evidence reduces the likelihood of contested hearings and supports efficient resolution where all parties’ interests are clearly documented.
Once we have a clear factual record, we prepare the formal petition, a proposed order, and supporting declarations. The petition sets out the legal basis for modification, references the trust provisions at issue, and explains the specific relief sought. We also prepare required notices for beneficiaries and other interested parties and file the petition with the appropriate probate court in Contra Costa County. Proper drafting is essential to present a concise, well-supported request that the court can evaluate efficiently and to reduce the risk of procedural defects or later challenges.
Preparing the petition requires clear articulation of the facts, the proposed changes, and the legal authority that supports the request. The proposed order clarifies the relief sought and, if entered, will direct trustees and third parties how to proceed. We ensure the petition includes all necessary attachments, such as certifications of trust or relevant financial statements, and that notices comply with statutory requirements. Well-prepared pleadings reduce delays and help focus subsequent court proceedings on the substantive issues that need resolution.
After filing, notice must be given to beneficiaries, named parties, and others with an interest in the trust. Some parties may file objections or request clarifications, and we respond by presenting additional evidence or seeking negotiated resolutions where possible. If disputes persist, the court will set a hearing to consider the petition and any objections. Clear notice and timely responses help preserve the record and ensure the court has the information needed to make an informed decision about whether to approve the requested modifications.
At the hearing the court reviews the petition, supporting declarations, and any objections. Judges evaluate whether the requested modification aligns with the trust maker’s intent and whether the proposed change is equitable under applicable law. If the court approves the petition, it issues an order that becomes part of the public record and directs trustees and third parties on administration and distributions. Implementation may include retitling assets, updating bank accounts, and issuing instructions to beneficiaries so the trust operates according to the court-approved terms.
During the hearing the court may ask for clarification of facts, additional documentation, or legal authorities supporting the requested relief. Presenting a coherent factual narrative and reliable evidence helps the judge understand why the modification is appropriate. We prepare clients for likely questions and organize exhibits so the key points are clear. Addressing the court’s concerns directly and respectfully increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome and reduces the chances of remand or further litigation.
After an order is entered, trustees take steps to implement its directives, which may include retitling assets, transferring accounts, issuing distributions, or recording documents with the county. We assist in preparing necessary transfer paperwork, communications to beneficiaries, and confirmations for financial institutions or title companies. Proper implementation ensures the trust functions under the modified terms and reduces the possibility of future disputes over administration or asset ownership by providing a clear, recorded trail of compliance with the court’s directions.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court to alter or clarify the terms of a trust when informal amendment is not possible, such as after a grantor’s death or where the trust instrument places limits on modification. The petition lays out the factual background, the requested change, and the legal basis for the court to approve the relief. It is appropriate when trustee action alone cannot resolve the issue or when beneficiaries disagree about interpretation or administration. Filing a petition ensures the change is binding and provides legal authority for trustees to act under the revised terms. The court evaluates whether the modification aligns with the grantor’s probable intent and whether it is equitable under applicable law. Outcomes may include approval, denial, or conditional orders that guide implementation while protecting parties’ rights.
A Heggstad petition focuses on declaring that certain property should be treated as trust property even though it was not formally retitled into the trust at the time of the grantor’s death. This procedure helps bring assets into trust administration when there is evidence the grantor intended them to be part of the trust but formal transfer was not completed. The petition relies on documentation that supports the grantor’s intent and past practice. By contrast, a trust modification petition seeks to change the trust’s substantive terms or clarify ambiguous provisions rather than to declare asset ownership. Both processes involve court filings, notice to interested parties, and potential hearings, but their objectives and required supporting records differ depending on whether the issue involves ownership or the trust’s operative language.
Yes, beneficiaries may challenge a proposed modification by filing objections or contesting the petition in court. Courts provide interested parties an opportunity to review filings and raise concerns about standing, the factual basis for the modification, or whether the change contradicts the grantor’s intent. When objections arise, the court considers evidence presented by all sides and evaluates competing positions before reaching a decision. To reduce the likelihood of challenges, petitioners should provide thorough documentation, offer clear notice to all interested parties, and explore negotiated resolutions when feasible. When disputes cannot be resolved informally, careful preparation for contested proceedings helps ensure the court has the information necessary to issue a fair and enforceable ruling.
Helpful evidence includes the trust instrument and any amendments, declarations from those with firsthand knowledge of the grantor’s intent, financial records, title documents, beneficiary designation forms, and correspondence reflecting the grantor’s actions or statements. A certification of trust can demonstrate the trust’s existence and identify the trustee without disclosing private terms, while bank and title records show actual asset ownership. Clear documentation of how assets were intended to be funded into the trust strengthens petitions asserting property belongs to the trust. Supporting declarations that explain the surrounding circumstances, such as prior estate planning meetings, draft documents, or contemporaneous notes, can be persuasive. The more a petition demonstrates consistent intent and factual support for the requested change, the easier it is for the court to evaluate and approve appropriate relief.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies based on the complexity of the issues, whether parties object, and the court’s calendar. Simple, uncontested petitions may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, while contested matters or cases requiring additional evidence or hearings can take several months or longer. Factors such as gathering documentary evidence, serving notice, and scheduling hearings all influence how long the process will take. To manage expectations, it helps to begin by collecting documents and communicating with interested parties early. Where possible, pursuing negotiated solutions or narrowing disputed issues can shorten the timeline and reduce legal costs while still achieving meaningful resolutions for trustees and beneficiaries.
A court-ordered modification affects the trust instrument itself and can change how related documents operate in practice. For example, if a pour-over will depends on certain trust provisions, a modification may alter distribution timing or the scope of assets available for pour-over transfers. It is important to review other estate planning documents such as powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and beneficiary designations to ensure consistency after a modification. Coordinating updates across related instruments avoids unintended conflicts and helps ensure the overall estate plan functions cohesively. We assist clients in reviewing and revising related documents to reflect changes approved by the court, reducing the risk of future disputes or administrative complications.
A trustee can take actions authorized by the trust instrument, such as discretionary distributions, investment decisions, or administrative steps permitted by the document. However, when the desired change is outside the trustee’s authority or when the trust maker cannot amend the trust directly, court approval through a petition may be required. Trustees must act within the trust’s terms and their fiduciary duties; when uncertainty exists, seeking judicial clarification protects trustees from liability. Documenting the basis for any trustee action and communicating with beneficiaries reduces risk. When trustees lack clear authority, a formal petition provides the necessary legal backing to carry out changes or clarifications and ensures third parties will honor the resulting directions.
If assets were not properly funded into a trust, a Heggstad petition or other declaration may be used to have those assets treated as trust property based on evidence of the grantor’s intent. Demonstrating intent can involve showing drafts, transfer attempts, beneficiary designation forms aligned with the trust, and contemporaneous statements. The court evaluates whether the substance of the transactions and documents supports treating the assets as trust property despite a lack of formal retitling. Resolving unfunded assets through the appropriate petition helps ensure assets are distributed according to the trust rather than through intestacy or separate probate administration. Prompt action to identify and remedy unfunded assets reduces complications and supports orderly trust administration.
Alternatives to filing a petition include negotiating written consents or settlement agreements among beneficiaries, relying on trustee powers within the trust instrument, or using informal amendments where the trust maker retains the right to change terms. These private solutions can be faster and less costly when all parties agree and the trust’s language permits such actions. Documentation of agreements and careful drafting are essential to ensure changes are implemented correctly and are enforceable. When consensus is not possible or when the trust’s terms or third-party requirements prevent informal changes, a court petition provides a definitive legal path. Evaluating alternatives early helps determine whether a private solution is viable or whether formal court involvement will provide the necessary legal certainty.
To get started, gather the trust documents, any related wills, beneficiary designations, account statements, and correspondence that reflect the grantor’s intentions. Contact a law firm experienced in trust petitions to review your materials and discuss the nature of the issue, potential remedies, and whether a petition is likely required. An initial assessment helps identify evidence to collect and outlines next procedural steps, including notices and timelines. If a petition appears necessary, prepare to provide declarations or statements from individuals with direct knowledge of relevant facts and to cooperate in assembling records. Early organization and prompt outreach facilitate a more efficient petition process and improve the likelihood of a timely and effective resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas