If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Pacheco, a trust modification petition can help you adapt your estate plan to new circumstances. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist clients with the legal steps needed to seek court approval for modifications when beneficiaries or trustees need adjustments, when changing law affects trust terms, or when settlors’ circumstances evolve. This introduction explains the purpose of a trust modification petition, common reasons people pursue one, and how the process can protect assets and intentions without undoing the overall plan. Contact our San Jose office at 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation in California.
Trust modification petitions are often pursued when a trust cannot be changed informally, when a settlor is incapacitated or deceased, or when errors or ambiguities in trust documents create uncertainty about administration. A modification petition asks the court to interpret, reform, or adjust trust terms to reflect intent, correct mistakes, or achieve equitable results consistent with trust purposes. This paragraph outlines the kinds of relief courts may grant, the typical parties involved, and how a measured approach can preserve beneficiaries’ interests. We focus on clear, practical communication to help families understand options and next steps in the Pacheco and Contra Costa County jurisdictions.
Pursuing a trust modification petition can resolve disputes, fix drafting errors, and adapt a trust to changed circumstances while maintaining the settlor’s overall plan. It provides a formal legal pathway to obtain court approval for reformation, interpretation, or modification of trust terms when other avenues are unavailable. A successful petition clarifies trustees’ duties, secures beneficiaries’ rights, and reduces the risk of future litigation by documenting a court-sanctioned resolution. For families in Pacheco and nearby communities, this service offers a durable means to align trust administration with current intentions and legal requirements, helping avoid confusion and reduce administrative disruption over time.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve clients across the Bay Area with a focus on practical, client-centered estate planning and trust administration matters. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, timely case management, and thoughtful legal strategy tailored to each family’s circumstances. We guide clients through petition preparation, evidence gathering, and court procedures while prioritizing settlement where possible to limit expense and delay. Located in San Jose and serving Pacheco and Contra Costa County, our team helps clients protect family assets and carry out the settlor’s intent through careful handling of trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters.
A trust modification petition is a legal request filed in probate or superior court to change, correct, or clarify the terms of an existing trust when informal amendment is impossible or inappropriate. Grounds for filing include ambiguous language, mistakes in drafting, changed circumstances that frustrate the trust’s purpose, or inability of the settlor to sign amendments. The petition sets out facts, legal authority, and the proposed modification, and it typically notifies beneficiaries and interested parties so they may respond. Understanding the legal standards and evidentiary requirements is essential to presenting a persuasive petition that courts will consider for reformation or other relief.
Courts evaluate trust modification petitions based on statutory rules, case law, and the settlor’s intent as reflected in the trust instrument. The hearing may involve affidavits, declarations, and documentary evidence such as drafts or correspondence showing the settlor’s intentions. When beneficiaries agree, settlements or stipulated orders can resolve petitions without trial, but contested matters require formal motions and judicial findings. Knowledge of local court practices, deadlines, and notice requirements in Contra Costa County and neighboring jurisdictions helps streamline the process and reduce unexpected delays or procedural complications.
A trust modification petition asks a court to approve a specific change to a trust document or to interpret unclear provisions. Outcomes may include reformation to correct a mistake, clarification of ambiguous terms, modification to account for unforeseen changes, or appointment or removal of a trustee in limited circumstances. The requested relief must align with state law and the settlor’s intent as reasonably determined from the record. Petition outcomes are tailored, aiming to preserve the settlor’s overall estate plan while addressing the problem that prompted court involvement, and they often include orders that guide future trust administration.
A strong petition includes a clear statement of the requested modification, factual background about the trust and the settlor’s intent, supporting documentary evidence, and legal argument grounded in California probate law. Procedural steps include preparing the petition, serving notice on beneficiaries and interested parties, filing required declarations and exhibits, and attending any status conferences or hearings. If disputes arise, the court may hold evidentiary hearings to weigh the credibility of competing accounts. Successful navigation of these steps requires organized documentation, timely compliance with local rules, and careful negotiation to achieve durable and enforceable relief.
Understanding common terms used in trust modification matters helps clients follow filings and court proceedings. The glossary below defines roles, documents, and legal concepts often referenced in petitions, such as settlor, trustee, beneficiaries, reformation, and modification. Becoming familiar with these terms improves communication with counsel and prepares clients for the kinds of evidence and argument a court considers. This section provides concise definitions and practical notes on how each term affects the petition process and potential outcomes in California probate courts.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and established its terms. The settlor’s intent is central to interpretation and modification questions; courts look to the settlor’s expressed wishes and relevant evidence when deciding petitions. If the settlor is alive and competent, they may be able to amend the trust directly, but when that is not possible, petitions may seek court authorization to modify terms in a manner consistent with the settlor’s original goals. Understanding the settlor’s role helps clarify who has standing and what evidence is most persuasive.
Reformation is a legal remedy asking the court to rewrite trust language to reflect the settlor’s true intent when a mistake in drafting created terms that do not match that intent. Reformation typically requires clear and convincing evidence that an error occurred and that the proposed correction aligns with what the settlor intended. Courts may grant reformation to fix typographical errors, ambiguous provisions, or omitted clauses that change material outcomes, thereby restoring the trust’s operation to what the settlor originally intended.
A trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets, following the trust’s terms, and acting in the beneficiaries’ interests. Trustee duties include investing trust assets prudently, making distributions according to the trust instrument, maintaining records, and providing accountings when required. When trust language is unclear, trustees may petition the court for instructions or ask for modification to clarify responsibilities. Petition outcomes often include specific directives or clarified powers that guide trustees in administering the trust consistent with court orders.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits from a trust under its terms. Beneficiaries are typically required to receive notice of petitions affecting trust terms and have the opportunity to object or participate in settlement discussions. Courts consider beneficiaries’ interests carefully when evaluating modification requests, and a settlement that protects beneficiaries’ reasonable expectations may resolve disputes without protracted litigation. Beneficiaries’ consent can often simplify the process, but courts still ensure the proposed change is legally appropriate and consistent with the settlor’s intent.
When trust modifications are needed, options include informal amendment (if the settlor can act), mediated settlement among interested parties, or a formal petition to the court. Informal amendment is the simplest when the settlor is able and willing to sign changes. Mediation can resolve disputes collaboratively without judicial intervention, often saving time and cost. A petition is necessary when parties cannot agree, the settlor cannot act, or legal defects require court authority. Choosing the right option depends on the parties’ relationships, urgency, and the legal issues at stake, with counsel helping to select the most appropriate path.
If the settlor is competent and available, they can often sign an amendment to address changes in circumstances or correct drafting errors, avoiding the need for a petition. This path is quicker and more private, and it preserves the trust’s continuity without court involvement. When amending, it is important to execute any amendment in accordance with statutory formalities to ensure enforceability. Legal counsel can assist by drafting clear amendment language that aligns with the original trust’s structure while addressing new goals or correcting mistakes to prevent future disputes among beneficiaries.
When all beneficiaries and interested parties agree on a modification, they may be able to enter into a written settlement or stipulation that amends administration practices or clarifies terms without litigation. California law in some cases allows for nonjudicial settlement agreements when they do not violate a material purpose of the trust. Such agreements reduce court time and costs, preserve confidentiality, and promote family harmony, but they should be drafted carefully to confirm that the proposed changes are legally valid and that notice and procedural requirements have been satisfied.
When trust language is ambiguous, parties disagree, or alleged drafting errors raise contested issues, a full legal approach that includes litigation preparation and representation may be necessary. A comprehensive strategy involves detailed factual investigation, collection of documentary evidence, drafting persuasive legal arguments, and, when required, presenting testimony at hearing. This thorough process helps ensure the court has a complete record to determine the settlor’s intent and the appropriate relief. It also protects parties’ rights by following rigorous procedural and evidentiary standards throughout the court proceeding.
If the requested modification would substantially change asset allocations, distribution timing, or create tax consequences, a comprehensive legal review is prudent to assess implications and structure the modification accordingly. These matters may involve coordinated work with tax advisors or financial professionals to evaluate income tax, estate tax, or property transfer issues. Courts may scrutinize large changes closely, so thorough preparation and legal analysis help anticipate potential objections, craft legally sound proposals, and seek outcomes that preserve the settlor’s intent while minimizing adverse fiscal or administrative impacts.
A comprehensive approach reduces the likelihood of future disputes by obtaining clear court orders that resolve ambiguity and define trustee duties. It allows careful analysis of legal and factual issues, coordination with financial advisors, and tailored drafting that anticipates future administration needs. Comprehensive representation also helps clients meet procedural requirements, provide necessary notice, and compile a persuasive evidentiary record. In the long run, this approach can save time and expense by preventing repeated litigation or misunderstandings among beneficiaries during trust administration.
Comprehensive handling increases the chances that a court-approved modification will be durable and enforceable, providing settled guidance for trustees and beneficiaries. The process typically includes negotiation efforts aimed at resolving disputes early and avoiding protracted court hearings where possible. Even when formal litigation is necessary, a full-service legal approach helps manage risk, set realistic expectations, and document outcomes that reflect the settlor’s intent while addressing changed circumstances. That stability benefits families, trustees, and long-term trust administration alike.
Obtaining a court order that clarifies or reforms trust terms provides trustees with authoritative instructions and reduces uncertainty about distributions, investment duties, and accounting obligations. Clear orders minimize conflict among beneficiaries by documenting the court’s interpretation or approved modification and setting out specific responsibilities and timelines. This clarity facilitates smoother administration and reduces the risk of subsequent litigation, which benefits trustees and beneficiaries by creating a predictable framework for carrying out the trust’s purposes over time.
A comprehensive legal effort focuses on aligning any changes with the settlor’s original goals while safeguarding beneficiaries’ reasonable expectations. Courts will consider both the settlor’s intent and beneficiaries’ interests, so careful advocacy aims to balance these considerations and seek relief that is equitable and legally sound. Whether through negotiation or litigation, documenting agreed changes or obtaining judicial approval protects all parties by creating enforceable outcomes that guide future trust management and preserve family relationships when possible.
Begin collecting all relevant documents and communications that reflect the settlor’s intent as soon as a modification issue arises. This includes drafts of trust documents, signed amendments, letters, emails, financial statements, and contemporaneous notes that show the settlor’s goals. Organized evidence supports reformation or interpretation requests and can streamline the petition process. Prompt documentation also helps preserve witnesses’ memories and reduces disputes about what the settlor intended. Maintaining a clear paper trail is one of the most effective ways to build a persuasive case for the relief you seek.
Before pursuing contested litigation, evaluate mediation or other alternative dispute resolution methods to resolve disagreements over trust terms. Mediation offers a confidential setting for parties to negotiate solutions with the help of a neutral facilitator and can be less adversarial than court proceedings. Successful mediation can produce a binding agreement that avoids the time and expense of a contested hearing. Even when mediation does not fully resolve the dispute, it can narrow issues and clarify positions, improving the efficiency of any subsequent court process.
Consider a trust modification petition if the trust contains ambiguous provisions, if drafting errors materially affect distributions, or if changed circumstances frustrate the original purpose of the trust. Other reasons include unresolved disputes among beneficiaries or trustees, discovery of documents that alter the understanding of the settlor’s intent, or structural problems that impede effective administration. A petition can provide a formal, enforceable resolution that clarifies duties and preserves the settlor’s goals, making it an important tool when informal solutions are not feasible or would not fully address the legal issues present.
You might also consider a petition when a trustee’s authority is questioned, when tax or creditor concerns require court-approved changes, or when a settlor’s incapacity prevents direct amendment. The petition process provides judicial oversight that can validate changes and limit future challenges. Before filing, evaluate all alternatives including amendment, settlement, or mediation to determine the most efficient and effective path. Working with counsel familiar with local probate procedures helps ensure your petition is properly framed and supported by appropriate evidence.
Many cases arise from simple drafting mistakes, ambiguities where language could be read in multiple ways, or life changes such as remarriage, divorce, changes in beneficiary needs, or relocation. Other circumstances include the discovery of omitted assets, unclear powers granted to trustees, or conflicts among beneficiaries about distribution intent. When informal amendment is not possible and parties do not agree, a petition to the probate court becomes the necessary mechanism to secure a clear, enforceable resolution that addresses both legal and practical concerns in trust administration.
Ambiguous language or drafting mistakes are frequent reasons for filing a trust modification petition. Even minor wording errors can cause significant ambiguity about distribution conditions or trustee powers, leading to conflicting interpretations among beneficiaries and trustees. When evidence shows the settlor intended different language or outcome, a petition can seek reformation to correct the trust document. Courts weigh documentary evidence and testimony to determine whether a correction is warranted and to craft an order that reflects the settlor’s true intentions while maintaining a stable administration framework.
Life events such as marriage, divorce, births, deaths, or notable shifts in financial circumstances often prompt the need to alter trust provisions. Such changes can make existing provisions impractical or misaligned with the settlor’s updated goals. A modification petition seeks to realign the trust with current realities while preserving the settlor’s overarching plan. Courts consider the purpose of the trust and whether the proposed change advances that purpose without creating unintended harm to beneficiaries’ reasonable expectations.
Disputes over a trustee’s authority, alleged breaches of fiduciary duties, or confusion about administrative procedures can prompt petitions for instruction, modification, or removal. Parties may seek court guidance when trustees are uncertain how to proceed or when beneficiaries challenge trustee actions. A petition can ask the court to define trustees’ powers, require accountings, or authorize specific actions to resolve impasses. Judicial involvement provides a neutral forum to balance competing interests and issue orders that facilitate orderly trust administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides guidance to families in Pacheco and Contra Costa County on trust modification petitions and related estate planning concerns. We assist with evaluating alternatives, assembling evidence, preparing court filings, and pursuing negotiated resolutions when possible. Our goal is to help clients achieve legally sound outcomes that reflect the settlor’s intent and protect beneficiaries’ interests. For practical counsel and representation regarding trust modifications, contact our San Jose office at 408-528-2827 to schedule a consultation and review your options in California courts.
Our firm is focused on clear communication and practical results for families facing trust disputes or needing formal modifications. We guide clients through procedural requirements, evidence preparation, and negotiations with beneficiaries and trustees. By identifying solutions that preserve relationships and limit cost, we aim to achieve outcomes consistent with the settlor’s intent and the trust’s purposes. Clients benefit from thoughtful case management, timely updates, and careful attention to local court practices in Contra Costa County and surrounding jurisdictions.
We help clients gather relevant documentation, prepare persuasive petitions, and navigate the notice and service requirements essential to a successful filing. Where possible, we pursue settlements and stipulated orders to minimize time in court and maintain family privacy. When litigation is necessary, we provide thorough preparation for hearings and aim to present a clear, well-supported record that addresses both factual and legal issues. Our approach is practical, focused on achieving enforceable results that support effective trust administration.
Clients appreciate our responsiveness and ability to explain technical legal matters in plain terms so they can make informed decisions. We coordinate with financial or tax advisors when needed to address broader implications of proposed modifications. Whether resolving drafting mistakes, clarifying trustee powers, or pursuing reformation, our firm seeks solutions that align with clients’ priorities while navigating California probate rules and court procedures efficiently.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust, related documents, and the circumstances prompting the requested change. We identify possible alternatives, assess the strength of available evidence, and prepare a strategy that aims for efficient resolution. Preparation includes drafting the petition and supporting declarations, providing required notice to interested parties, and attempting negotiation or mediation when appropriate. If court hearings are required, we present a focused record and legal argument designed to obtain durable relief. Throughout, we keep clients informed and provide practical guidance on next steps and likely timelines.
The first step involves a thorough assessment of the trust instrument, any related amendments, and documents that shed light on the settlor’s intent. This may include correspondence, drafts, financial records, and witness statements. We identify relevant statutory authority and precedent to support the requested modification and determine whether notice or additional procedural steps are required. A clear and orderly compilation of evidence at the outset strengthens the petition and helps identify the most efficient path to resolution, including whether settlement is feasible.
We examine the trust document in detail, noting any provisions that are inconsistent, ambiguous, or impractical. This review includes prior amendments, related wills such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, healthcare directives, and any documents that reference settlor intent. Identifying these materials early allows us to craft focused arguments and gather supporting evidence. The review also determines which parties must receive notice and whether proposed modifications affect tax, creditor, or other legal considerations that should be addressed in the petition.
We work with clients to collect evidence that supports the modification request, which may include drafting declarations from witnesses, locating correspondence showing settlor intent, and assembling financial records or drafts of the trust. Witness statements and documentary evidence often form the core of a persuasive petition for reformation or clarification. Organizing these materials clearly and early minimizes delays and helps demonstrate to the court that the proposed changes reflect the settlor’s objectives rather than an attempt to alter distributions unfairly.
Once the petition and supporting materials are prepared, we file the documents with the appropriate probate court and serve notice on all required beneficiaries and interested parties. Proper service is vital to avoid challenges to the petition’s validity. The filing includes declarations, exhibits, and any proposed orders. We monitor the response period, respond to objections if they arise, and continue negotiating toward resolution where possible. Timely and compliant filing practices help ensure the petition proceeds without procedural setbacks.
Drafting the petition requires clear factual narratives, legal analysis, and properly formatted exhibits that courts expect. We prepare declarations that explain the factual basis for the requested relief and attach exhibits such as trust pages, drafts, and relevant correspondence. The petition must align with local rules and include any filing fees or required case management statements. Well-prepared submissions increase the likelihood of favorable court review and streamline eventual hearings or stipulated orders.
After filing, we ensure notice is served on all interested parties and document service according to statutory requirements. Parties have an opportunity to respond or object, and we manage any opposition by engaging in negotiation or preparing responsive filings. Documented attempts at settlement and clear communication with beneficiaries can reduce contention and lead to agreed resolutions. If objections persist, we continue to prepare the record and legal argument necessary for the court to make an informed decision at hearing.
If hearings are required, we present declarations, documentary evidence, and argument to the probate court, focusing on demonstrating the propriety of the requested modification. The court may issue an order granting reformation, clarification, or another form of relief, often with specific instructions for future administration. Once an order is obtained, we assist with implementing the changes, updating trust records, notifying trustees and beneficiaries as required, and advising on any follow-up steps to ensure compliance with the court’s directives.
During hearings, clear presentation of documentary evidence and concise witness declarations is critical to persuading the court. We prepare witnesses, organize exhibits, and frame legal arguments so the judge can readily see how the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and statutory authority. Effective hearing preparation also includes anticipating opposing arguments and addressing potential deficiencies in the record, allowing the court to reach a well-informed conclusion based on the facts and law presented.
After receiving a court order, we assist with implementing the approved changes, which may involve updating trust documents, notifying trustees and beneficiaries, and ensuring trustees understand any new instructions. We help prepare the necessary trust certifications or amended record documents so trustees can continue administration without uncertainty. Proper execution of the court’s order protects the parties and reduces the chance of further disputes by documenting the approved modification and making it part of the trust’s official record.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to change, clarify, or reform terms of an existing trust when informal amendment is not possible or appropriate. It is necessary when the settlor cannot sign an amendment, when drafting errors produce unintended outcomes, when beneficiaries or trustees disagree about interpretation, or when changed circumstances frustrate the trust’s purpose. The petition outlines the requested relief, factual background, and supporting evidence and seeks a judicial order that resolves the issue in an enforceable way. The court process typically requires notice to interested parties and an opportunity for them to respond. When parties agree, a stipulated order or settlement may resolve the matter without a contested hearing. When disputes persist, the court evaluates the record and issues an order that best aligns with the settlor’s documented intent and applicable law. Proper preparation and clear evidence increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
Courts evaluate modification or reformation petitions based on statutory authority and the settlor’s probable intent as shown by the trust instrument and supporting evidence. For reformation to correct mistakes, courts commonly require persuasive documentary evidence that the trust as written does not reflect what the settlor intended. Judges consider the overall context of the trust, related documents, and credible witness statements that shed light on the settlor’s objectives. When deciding whether modification is appropriate, courts also consider whether the proposed change violates a material purpose of the trust or harms beneficiaries’ reasonable expectations. The presence of clear, consistent evidence and adherence to procedural requirements, including proper notice and service, supports judicial willingness to grant corrective relief.
Beneficiaries can object to a trust modification petition by filing formal responses or appearing at hearings to present reasons the requested change should be denied. Courts will give weight to beneficiaries’ objections, especially when they show the proposed modification would unfairly alter distributions or contradict clear provisions in the trust document. Beneficiaries also have the opportunity to negotiate settlements or propose alternative language that better preserves their interests. However, beneficiaries cannot automatically block a petition if the court finds the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intent or is necessary to correct a clear drafting error. Judicial review seeks to balance beneficiaries’ interests with enforcement of the trust’s purposes and the settlor’s demonstrated wishes.
The time required to resolve a trust modification petition varies with case complexity, the number of interested parties, and whether objections arise. Simple, uncontested petitions that result in stipulated orders may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, depending on court schedules. Contested matters that require evidentiary hearings typically take longer, often several months to a year or more, as courts manage briefing schedules, hearings, and necessary discovery. Local probate court calendars, the need for additional evidence or expert consultation, and the extent of negotiation among parties all influence timing. Early document collection, clear pleadings, and attempts at settlement can shorten the process, while contested litigation invariably extends it.
A modification petition can have tax and creditor implications depending on the nature of the requested change and the trust’s assets. Significant reallocation of assets or changes that affect distribution timing may alter income tax, estate tax, or creditor rights, so it is important to evaluate these consequences before finalizing a petition. Coordination with tax or financial advisors helps identify potential adverse effects and structure the proposed modification to mitigate them where possible. Courts may consider tax or creditor impacts when reviewing petitions, and parties should disclose material issues to avoid surprise. Proper planning and legal analysis reduce the risk of unintended financial consequences and help ensure the court-approved modification is practical and legally sustainable.
If the settlor is alive and has capacity, they can generally amend or revoke a revocable trust directly according to the trust’s amendment provisions, avoiding court petitions. Amending while the settlor is competent is typically faster, less costly, and preserves privacy. The amendment should comply with required formalities to ensure enforceability and avoid future challenges based on improper execution or lack of clarity. When the settlor lacks capacity, is deceased, or when the amendment authority is disputed, a petition may be necessary to obtain court approval to modify the trust. In such situations, the court can issue orders to effect changes consistent with the settlor’s intent and protect beneficiaries’ interests when direct amendment is not possible.
Documentary evidence that reflects the settlor’s intent is often the most persuasive in a reformation case. This can include prior drafts of the trust or related instruments, correspondence, handwritten notes, financial records, or declarations from witnesses who had direct knowledge of the settlor’s wishes. Clear, contemporaneous documents that show consistent intent strengthen a petition for reformation by demonstrating that the existing language deviates from what the settlor intended. Credible witness declarations and factual details that corroborate documentary evidence also help the court evaluate competing accounts. The combination of written records and consistent witness testimony forms a compelling factual foundation that supports judicial correction or clarification of trust terms.
Mediation can be an effective tool in trust disputes by providing a confidential forum for parties to explore settlement and reach mutually acceptable solutions. A neutral mediator helps clarify disputed issues, identify workable compromises, and preserve family relationships by avoiding adversarial court proceedings. When mediation succeeds, it often results in a stipulated agreement or settlement that can be presented to the court for approval, saving time, cost, and emotional strain. Even if mediation does not fully resolve the dispute, it can narrow contested issues and facilitate more efficient litigation. Courts and counsel often view mediation favorably because it shows parties made a good-faith effort to resolve matters without prolonged adversarial proceedings.
If a trustee refuses to follow a court order, interested parties may return to court to seek enforcement measures. Remedies can include contempt proceedings, appointment of a successor trustee, or other judicial actions to compel compliance and protect trust assets. The court has authority to enforce orders that govern trust administration and to impose consequences for willful disobedience that harms beneficiaries or undermines the trust’s purpose. Before seeking enforcement, parties typically document attempts at informal resolution and provide the trustee an opportunity to comply. Counsel can assist in presenting a focused enforcement application that demonstrates noncompliance and requests appropriate remedial action to restore proper administration of the trust.
Costs for filing a trust modification petition vary by complexity, court fees, service costs, and whether the matter is contested. Simple, uncontested petitions that resolve by stipulation generally incur lower fees, primarily comprised of filing and service costs along with legal preparation time. Contested cases require additional work such as depositions, discovery, and hearing preparation, which increases total expense. Discussing budget expectations early helps identify efficient paths and alternatives like mediation that may reduce cost. We provide transparent information about likely fees and work with clients to prioritize steps that address the key issues while managing expense and timeline considerations.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas