A Heggstad Petition is a legal filing used in California to confirm that real or personal property should have been held in a trust at the decedent’s death, even if title was never transferred. If you live in Pinole or elsewhere in Contra Costa County and a trust was meant to control an asset but the paperwork or title was not updated, a Heggstad Petition can clarify ownership and avoid lengthy probate. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist clients throughout the region in understanding whether a petition is appropriate, the evidence needed to support it, and the likely timeline and costs involved.
When someone intended to fund a revocable living trust but property remained titled in their individual name, beneficiaries and trustees can face difficulty settling the estate. A Heggstad Petition seeks a court declaration that the asset belonged in the trust at the decedent’s death under California Probate Code. The process often requires clear documentation of the decedent’s intent, related trust documents such as a Pour-Over Will or Certification of Trust, and proof of efforts to transfer title. Our firm provides practical guidance on compiling that evidence and presenting a persuasive petition tailored to local court practices in Contra Costa County.
Filing a Heggstad Petition can restore the intended trust administration and help avoid full probate for assets that should have been governed by the trust. It benefits trustees and beneficiaries by clarifying ownership, enabling assets to be managed or distributed according to the trust terms, and reducing administrative delays and expenses. Beyond cost and efficiency, a successful petition provides peace of mind that the decedent’s wishes are being followed. Proper preparation can limit objections and procedural hurdles and make the court’s decision clearer, helping families move forward with trust administration and property transfers without unnecessary litigation.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, based in San Jose, handles a broad range of estate planning and trust administration matters for clients across the Bay Area, including Pinole and Contra Costa County. Our approach focuses on practical, document-driven solutions to confirm trust ownership and resolve title issues efficiently. We work closely with trustees, family members, and fiduciaries to gather trust instruments, wills such as Pour-Over Wills, trust certifications, and other supporting records. Through clear communication and careful preparation, we strive to present Heggstad Petitions that address court requirements and the factual record in a straightforward way.
A Heggstad Petition asks a probate court to recognize that certain property belonged to a trust at the decedent’s death despite an absence of proper title transfer. The petition must present evidence of the decedent’s intent to transfer the property to the trust, such as the trust document, related estate planning instruments like a Pour-Over Will, correspondence, deeds, or actions taken to fund the trust. The court analyzes whether the asset was effectively part of the trust and can then authorize trustee control or distribution under the trust terms, rather than through probate, streamlining estate administration for many families.
The burden in a Heggstad proceeding centers on proving intent and demonstrating that the trustee or beneficiaries are entitled to treat the asset as trust property. Evidence that a trust existed, that the decedent took steps consistent with funding it, and that the asset was meant to be managed by the trust helps the court make a ruling. The petition may be uncontested or opposed, and outcomes depend on the strength of the documentary and testimonial record. Working with counsel who understands local probate practice can help identify the most persuasive evidence and anticipate potential challenges from interested parties.
A Heggstad Petition is named for a California case and is used to ask the court to declare an asset part of a trust despite improper or absent transfer documents. It commonly arises when a decedent created a revocable living trust but failed to move title before death, or when bank or county records show the decedent as owner. The petition sets forth the trust’s terms, explains the steps taken to fund the trust, and requests a judicial determination so the trustee can take control or distribute the property according to the trust. It provides a pathway to avoid formal probate administration for assets that were intended to be held in trust.
To prevail on a Heggstad Petition, the petitioner must assemble a clear record showing the existence of a trust, the decedent’s intent, and actions indicating an effort to transfer assets into the trust. Critical items include the trust instrument, a Pour-Over Will, any deeds or transfer documents, bank records, communications reflecting intent, and affidavits from those with knowledge of the decedent’s intentions. A properly drafted petition explains the legal basis for the requested declaration, identifies interested parties, and proposes the precise relief sought so the court can issue an order that allows trustees to administer or distribute the asset under the trust.
Understanding common terms used in Heggstad proceedings helps trustees and family members navigate the process. Definitions such as trust, trustee, beneficiary, Pour-Over Will, deed, and probate are central to the petition and the court’s analysis. Familiarity with these concepts makes it easier to gather the right documents and provide clear explanations to the court. Below are simple definitions of essential terms you may encounter, along with how they relate to the petition and trust administration process in California.
A revocable living trust is a legal arrangement that holds a person’s assets for management during life and distribution after death under the trust’s terms. It allows the grantor to name a trustee and beneficiaries and often includes provisions for successor trustees. Unlike a will, a properly funded trust can allow assets to be distributed without formal probate. When property remains titled in the decedent’s name by oversight, a Heggstad Petition can be used to confirm that those assets were intended to belong to the revocable living trust at death.
A Pour-Over Will is a will designed to transfer any assets that were not moved into a trust during the grantor’s lifetime into the trust upon death. It works as a safety net so that residual property can be transferred to the trust and distributed according to its terms. In Heggstad proceedings, a Pour-Over Will can support the claim that the decedent intended the trust to control the asset, and it may be used as evidence of the grantor’s overall estate plan and intent to have assets governed by the trust.
A Certification of Trust is a short document that confirms the existence and key terms of a trust without revealing the full details of the trust instrument. It typically includes the trustee’s powers and identification of the trust, and it can be presented to financial institutions or title companies to show the trustee’s authority. In Heggstad matters a certification can help demonstrate the trust’s authenticity and the trustee’s right to act while protecting sensitive provisions contained in the full trust document.
Title and deed issues arise when records show ownership in the decedent’s individual name despite their intent to transfer property to a trust. Resolving these issues often requires a review of deeds, transfer forms, beneficiary designations, and account registrations. A Heggstad Petition seeks a judicial determination that, for trust administration purposes, the property should be treated as trust property even though the recorded title was not updated. Proper documentation and evidence of intent are decisive in persuading the court to order the reallocation of ownership for administration under the trust.
When an asset remains titled outside a trust, concerned parties have several options: initiate a Heggstad Petition to confirm trust ownership, open a probate proceeding to administer the asset under court supervision, or pursue a quiet title action in some circumstances. A Heggstad Petition is often preferable to probate when the trust and supporting evidence strongly show intent to transfer, because it can be faster and more consistent with the decedent’s plan. The right choice depends on the strength of records, the presence of disputes, and the goals of trustees and beneficiaries; careful evaluation of the facts will guide the best path forward.
A limited filing like a Heggstad Petition is appropriate when the trust and supporting records plainly demonstrate the decedent’s intent and there are no substantial factual disputes among interested parties. Evidence such as the trust instrument, a Pour-Over Will, deeds showing prior attempts to transfer, bank records, and credible affidavits can create a straightforward record for the court. When beneficiaries and potential objectors either agree or do not present competing claims, a targeted petition can achieve recognition of trust ownership without the time and expense of formal probate, allowing the trustee to proceed with management or distribution under the trust terms.
A limited approach may also suffice when the issue concerns a single asset or a small portion of the estate with clear documentation and no complex creditor issues. If the contested item’s value is modest and the trust’s intent is clear, pursuing a Heggstad Petition can be cost-effective and quick. The court can provide a targeted declaration that allows the trustee to take control of the particular property, avoiding the broader administration tasks and reporting obligations associated with probate. In these situations, focused legal action can resolve the discrete title problem efficiently.
Comprehensive legal service is often needed when disputes about ownership, competing beneficiary claims, creditor issues, or unclear documentation make the case complex. In such scenarios, a full probate administration may be unavoidable or a more detailed litigation strategy may be required to protect the rights of trustees and beneficiaries. Comprehensive representation includes preparing formal pleadings, managing discovery, negotiating with adverse parties, and advocating in court. A thorough approach helps ensure that all legal avenues are explored and that fiduciaries can fulfill their duties while minimizing liability exposure during contested proceedings.
When multiple assets or interrelated estate planning instruments are involved, resolving title issues through isolated filings may lead to incomplete results. A comprehensive review considers retirement account designations, life insurance trusts such as an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, beneficiary forms, and related documents like a Certification of Trust or Pour-Over Will. Coordinated action ensures that transfers, tax implications, and administrative responsibilities are handled consistently across the estate. A broader plan reduces the risk of future disputes and aligns final distributions with the decedent’s overall estate plan.
A comprehensive, document-driven approach to resolving trust funding and title issues reduces the likelihood of future disputes and streamlines administration. By reviewing all trust-related instruments, beneficiary designations, deeds, and account records, legal counsel can identify inconsistencies and correct them in a coordinated manner. That process often results in stronger court filings, clearer orders, and more predictable outcomes. It also helps trustees carry out their duties with confidence, ensuring that distributions comply with the trust and that potential challenges are addressed proactively rather than reactively.
Comprehensive handling can also offer economic benefits in the long run by minimizing the risk of prolonged litigation, repeated court actions, or the need to reopen matters later. Consolidating related claims, clarifying titles across different assets, and ensuring that trust documentation is complete and consistent will often prevent successors from facing additional disputes. This holistic perspective supports efficient administration, reduces stress for family members, and helps trustees focus on carrying out the decedent’s wishes promptly and accurately.
A comprehensive approach limits delays by addressing title and funding issues together, reducing the need for multiple filings or repeated court appearances. Consolidated actions and well-organized evidence enable courts to issue clear, enforceable orders that permit trustees to act without further procedural hurdles. That efficiency can translate into lower overall expenses for the estate compared with piecemeal litigation, and it helps beneficiaries receive distributions in a timelier manner. Clear documentation and coordinated filings also reduce the chance of objections causing additional hearings or appeals.
When the trustee’s authority and the trust’s terms are clearly presented to the court, the resulting orders more reliably enable trustees to manage or distribute assets without ongoing disputes. A comprehensive record that includes trust instruments, related wills like a Pour-Over Will, certifications, and evidentiary support strengthens the legal position of those seeking recognition of trust ownership. Clear court findings reduce uncertainty and limit opportunities for parties to challenge trustee actions in the future, helping ensure faithful administration in line with the decedent’s plan.
Begin by collecting all relevant documents, including the trust instrument, any Pour-Over Will, deeds, bank statements, and correspondence indicating the decedent’s intent. Affidavits from witnesses who knew the decedent’s plan can be very helpful. Organizing these items into a chronological file supports a coherent narrative for the court and can reduce the time required to prepare the petition. Early collection of records also helps identify any gaps that should be addressed before filing, improving the petition’s chances of success.
Prepare a focused factual presentation that explains how the asset relates to the trust and why the court should treat it as trust property. Use documentary evidence and concise affidavits to tell a coherent story: who created the trust, what actions were taken to fund it, how the property relates to the trust, and what relief is requested. A well-organized petition that anticipates potential challenges and addresses them with evidence tends to move more smoothly through probate court and leads to clearer orders for trustees to follow.
Consider a Heggstad Petition if a trust exists but title records show property in the decedent’s individual name, when a Pour-Over Will suggests the asset should have been transferred, or when trustees need clear authority to manage or distribute that property. The petition is particularly relevant when there is minimal disagreement about the decedent’s intent but formal title paperwork is lacking. It is also useful when speed and reduced costs compared with probate are priorities and when a documented record supporting trust funding can be established to persuade the probate court.
You may also consider filing when bank or county records have not been updated, when successor trustees encounter holdbacks from institutions, or when beneficiaries need a court order to facilitate asset transfers to the trust. If there is a risk of creditor claims or competing beneficiary assertions, careful planning and possibly broader proceedings may be required, but the Heggstad Petition remains an important tool. Assessing the facts early helps determine whether this targeted filing or a larger estate administration strategy best serves the family’s objectives.
Typical circumstances prompting a Heggstad Petition include a decedent who executed a revocable living trust but died before transferring real property, bank accounts, or titles; failure to record a deed into the trust; overlooked beneficiary forms on retirement accounts; or administrative oversights that left assets in the decedent’s name. Confusion can also arise when informal statements about intent exist without corroborating documents, creating the need for a court declaration. In many cases, straightforward documentary proof and affidavits are enough to allow the probate court to recognize the asset as trust property and authorize trustee action.
Real estate often remains titled in the decedent’s name even after a trust is created, particularly if deed transfers were not completed. A Heggstad Petition can ask the court to declare that the property was meant to be part of the trust so that the trustee can manage or distribute it without formal probate. The petition should include the trust document, any deed attempts, and evidence of intent such as communications or estate planning records. The court’s declaration enables the trustee to record corrective documents and proceed with trust administration.
Bank accounts and investment accounts sometimes remain in an individual’s name and are not retitled to the trust, which can impede transfer after death. A petition can establish that such accounts were intended to be trust property, allowing trustees to access funds for estate administration and distribution according to the trust. Providing account statements, beneficiary designations, and trustee certifications supports the position that the accounts belonged to the trust at the time of death. Clear court authorization prevents institutions from refusing to recognize trustee authority.
Assets may be overlooked during the funding process, including personal property, vehicles, or small investment holdings, and these oversights can create administrative obstacles. When the decedent’s intent to fund the trust is documented elsewhere, such as in the trust instrument or a Pour-Over Will, a Heggstad Petition can correct the record. Compiling affidavits and related evidence helps the court determine that the property was meant to be part of the trust. Resolving these oversights through a targeted petition often prevents unnecessary probate and simplifies final distributions.
If you need to address title or trust funding issues in Pinole, our team provides guidance on whether a Heggstad Petition is appropriate and how to assemble the necessary evidence. We assist trustees and beneficiaries in documenting intent, preparing petitions, handling notice requirements, and navigating the Contra Costa County probate court’s procedures. From gathering trust instruments to preparing affidavits and supporting exhibits, our approach focuses on clear communication with families and practical steps to obtain court orders that allow trustees to carry out the decedent’s wishes.
Clients come to us for focused, document-centered representation that aims to resolve Heggstad and trust funding issues efficiently. We bring years of experience handling estate planning and trust administration for individuals and families across the Bay Area, addressing title issues, Pour-Over Wills, and trust certifications. Our role is to evaluate your situation, explain the options, and prepare a petition and supporting record designed to meet local court expectations. We work with trustees to secure the authority needed to manage and distribute trust assets promptly.
We emphasize clear communication and meticulous case preparation to reduce the time courts and institutions require to recognize trustee authority. Whether gathering deeds, account statements, or witness affidavits, we help clients collect the factual support that courts look for in a Heggstad Petition. We also assist with required notices to interested parties and respond to objections with careful legal analysis. Our goal is to help trustees and families resolve title issues with minimal disruption to estate administration and family relationships.
From initial case assessment to drafting and filing the petition and obtaining a final court order, we guide clients through each step while keeping practical outcomes in focus. We understand the procedural nuances of Contra Costa County probate courts and prioritize solutions that align with clients’ timelines and budgets. If additional or broader proceedings are necessary, we provide realistic counsel about next steps and coordinate litigation or settlement efforts to protect fiduciary duties and beneficiary interests.
Our process begins with an intake and document review to determine whether a Heggstad Petition is the right route. We then identify and collect necessary records, draft the petition with supporting affidavits and exhibits, and prepare the required notifications to interested parties. After filing, we monitor court deadlines, respond to inquiries or objections, and advocate for a timely hearing and order. Throughout the process we keep clients informed about likely timelines, potential costs, and any steps they can take to support the petition and limit delays.
Step one focuses on obtaining the trust document and related estate planning records, identifying the asset at issue, and gathering supporting evidence such as deeds, account statements, communications, and affidavits. We also assess who must be noticed and whether any creditor or competing claims are foreseeable. This phase establishes a clear factual foundation and helps determine whether a narrow Heggstad Petition or a broader approach is appropriate based on local practice and the complexity of the matter.
A careful review of the trust instrument, Pour-Over Will, Certification of Trust, and any prior amendments identifies the trust’s terms and helps frame the petition. Examining these documents clarifies whether the trust explicitly or implicitly included the asset and reveals the trustee’s authority. This analysis guides the formulation of legal arguments and helps document the decedent’s intent in a way that the court can readily evaluate. Gathering complete and accurate copies of these instruments is a priority in preparing a persuasive petition.
We gather deeds, title records, account statements, transfer attempts, and any correspondence that demonstrates intent to fund the trust. Witness affidavits from family members, financial advisors, or others who recall the decedent’s plan provide supporting testimony. Together these materials create a narrative showing the trust’s intended ownership of the asset. Careful assembly of this evidence reduces gaps in the record and strengthens the petition, improving the likelihood of a favorable court decision without prolonged discovery or hearings.
Once the factual record is compiled, we draft the petition and supporting exhibits, identify necessary parties for notice, and prepare proposed orders for the court’s review. The petition explains the legal basis for the requested declaration, summarizes the evidence, and requests relief to allow trustee control or distribution. After filing, the court sets a hearing date and parties have an opportunity to respond. Our goal is to present a concise, organized pleading that anticipates common objections and facilitates a clear judicial ruling.
Drafting includes a clear statement of facts, legal authority under California Probate Code and case law, and exhibits such as trust copies, deeds, and affidavits. We organize exhibits to highlight the most persuasive evidence of intent and proper funding efforts. A well-prepared petition anticipates procedural requirements and provides the court with the factual and legal framework needed to rule in favor of recognizing the asset as part of the trust, reducing the need for extended hearings or supplemental filings.
Proper service and notice to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties are essential. We prepare and serve notices, provide proof of service, and coordinate responses to any objections raised. If objections occur, we evaluate their basis and work to resolve them through negotiation or supplemental filings where appropriate. Addressing concerns early and managing disputes professionally often leads to quicker resolutions and reduces the scope of contested litigation before the court.
At the hearing the court considers the petition, evidence, and any objections. If the court finds the asset belonged to the trust at death, it issues an order authorizing the trustee to take possession, manage, or distribute the asset under the trust terms. After receiving the order, trustees may record corrective deeds, update account registrations, and complete any required transfers. We assist with post-order steps to ensure institutions accept the court’s ruling and that asset transfers are carried out correctly and efficiently.
During the hearing the court reviews the petition, supporting exhibits, and any opposition to determine whether the evidence establishes trust ownership. Prepared affidavits and well-organized documents help the judge reach a decision. If the petition is granted, the court issues an order that provides trustees with the authority they need. If additional evidence or clarification is required, the court may continue the matter. Effective presentation at this stage can minimize follow-up proceedings and clarify post-order duties for trustees.
After obtaining a court order, trustees typically record any corrective deeds, provide the order to financial institutions, and update account registrations to reflect trust ownership. We help prepare the documents institutions often request and guide trustees through the steps to effectuate transfers. Ensuring that title and registration are updated reduces the chance of future disputes and enables trustees to administer or distribute trust assets in accordance with the decedent’s plan, completing the process that began with the Heggstad Petition filing.
A Heggstad Petition is a probate filing that asks the court to declare certain property belonged to a trust at the decedent’s death despite the absence of proper title transfer. It is commonly used when a decedent created a revocable living trust but did not complete the administrative step of retitling real estate, bank accounts, or other assets. The petition sets out the trust terms, the factual basis for funding the trust, and requests a judicial determination that allows the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust. This filing is particularly useful when documentation supports the decedent’s intent and parties are likely to accept the court’s declaration. It can be faster and less costly than full probate for the disputed asset, but the success of a petition depends on the strength of the record and adherence to notice requirements for interested parties in the probate court.
Timelines for a Heggstad Petition can vary based on the court’s calendar, the completeness of the filing, and whether objections arise. In Contra Costa County an uncontested petition that is well-documented may move through the notice and hearing process in several months, while contested matters can extend longer. The initial stages include document preparation, service of notice, and scheduling a hearing, so prompt collection of records helps shorten procedural delays. If objections are raised, additional hearings or briefing may be required, extending the timeframe. Planning for potential responses and preparing a thorough evidentiary record in advance improves the likelihood of a timely hearing and order, helping trustees proceed with administration after the court’s decision.
Supporting a Heggstad Petition requires clear documentation of the trust instrument, any Pour-Over Will, deeds or attempted transfer documents, account statements, and correspondence showing intent to fund the trust. Affidavits from persons who knew the decedent’s plan, such as family members or advisors, can provide persuasive testimonial evidence. A Certification of Trust may be used to confirm the trust’s existence and the trustee’s authority without revealing private terms of the trust. Organizing documentation chronologically and including evidentiary exhibits makes the petition easier for the court to evaluate. The stronger and more consistent the documentary record, the more likely the court will accept the petition without extensive additional fact-finding or contested proceedings.
A successful Heggstad Petition can allow a trustee to take control of specific assets without full probate administration for those items, thereby avoiding probate for the particular property at issue. However, whether probate can be avoided entirely for an estate depends on the overall asset structure and whether other assets require court-supervised administration. If the trust covers most assets and the petition addresses the remaining items, probate may be unnecessary for those specific assets. If there are disputes, creditor issues, or other complications, full probate might still be necessary. Evaluating the estate broadly helps determine if the petition alone will suffice or if additional estate administration steps are required to resolve all matters properly.
California law requires notice to interested parties when filing a Heggstad Petition, which typically includes beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs at law, successor trustees, and sometimes creditors or other parties with potential claims. Proper service of notice and filing proof with the court are procedural prerequisites, and failure to notify required parties can delay or invalidate proceedings. Mapping out all likely interested parties at the outset helps ensure compliance with notice rules and limits procedural setbacks. Providing clear, timely notice can also reduce resistance and encourage resolution without contested litigation. When parties receive appropriate information about the petition and an opportunity to respond, many matters proceed without significant objection, easing the path to a court order that authorizes trustee action.
If someone objects to a Heggstad Petition, the court will consider the objection and may call for additional evidence, hearings, or briefing to resolve disputed factual or legal issues. Objections commonly challenge the sufficiency of proof regarding the decedent’s intent or the authenticity of documents. Addressing objections requires a careful review of the evidence and may involve testimony or supplemental affidavits to strengthen the petitioner’s case. In many instances, objections can be resolved through negotiation, clarification, or presentation of further documentation. When disputes persist, the court will make a determination based on the record. Preparing a comprehensive initial filing and anticipating likely challenges can reduce the chance that objections will prolong the process significantly.
Yes, a court order granting a Heggstad Petition can provide the trustee with authority to record deeds, change account registrations, or otherwise take steps to effectuate the court’s determination that the asset belonged to the trust at death. Institutions often require a certified copy of the court order and related documents such as a Certification of Trust or trustee affidavit before accepting changes to title or account ownership. A clear order makes institutions more likely to comply without requiring additional litigation. After the order is issued, trustees must follow recording and transfer procedures applicable to the asset, such as recording corrective deeds for real property or completing institution-specific forms for bank and investment accounts. Assistance preparing these materials helps ensure institutions accept the changes and that administration proceeds smoothly.
Heggstad Petitions generally address assets that are controlled by title or registration. Retirement accounts and life insurance typically pass by beneficiary designation rather than by title, so they are not commonly resolved through a Heggstad Petition. However, related issues such as inconsistent beneficiary designations, or assets owned by the decedent that should have been retitled to trust, can intersect with trust administration and may require coordinated action. For certain trust-owned life insurance arrangements such as an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, documentation proving trust ownership can be important. When retirement accounts or insurance proceeds are at issue, reviewing beneficiary designations and trust documents together clarifies the best route to secure intended outcomes. In some cases, resolving title or registered account issues helps complete overall trust administration, but each asset type must be evaluated under its own rules and procedures.
Costs for filing a Heggstad Petition vary depending on the complexity of the factual record, the need for witness affidavits, and whether the matter is contested. Typical expenses include court filing fees, costs for obtaining certified documents and title records, and legal fees for preparing the petition and supporting exhibits. An uncontested petition with a strong documentary record will generally be less expensive than a contested matter that requires hearings, discovery, or litigation. Discussing the specifics of your case early allows for a realistic estimate of potential costs and helps prioritize document collection to limit unnecessary expense. Our firm provides transparent guidance on likely fees and strategies to manage costs while pursuing the most efficient path to obtain necessary court orders.
To discuss a Heggstad Petition, contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at the number listed on the website or through the online contact form. We will schedule an initial consultation to review your situation, identify the trust and the asset in question, and advise on the evidence needed to support a petition. Early document gathering and a clear summary of involved parties expedite the assessment and help determine the best approach for your case. During the consultation we explain the filing process, notice requirements, expected timelines, and likely costs. We work with trustees and families to prepare a focused petition that addresses the probate court’s needs and helps secure the authority required to properly administer trust assets in accordance with the decedent’s intentions.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas