A Heggstad petition can be an essential tool when trust assets remain titled in the name of a deceased person. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in Pittsburg, we help people confirm that those assets belong to a trust so they can be distributed according to the trust terms without unnecessary delay. This guide explains what a Heggstad petition is, how it works in Contra Costa County and California courts, and practical steps families typically take. If you are managing a loved one’s affairs after death, understanding this petition can streamline administration and reduce the risk of disputes over property ownership.
Many trustee and successor trustee appointments are straightforward, but when assets were never retitled into the trust prior to the settlor’s death, a Heggstad petition provides a judicial declaration that those assets are trust property. This process often prevents probate for specific assets and clarifies title questions for banks, transfer agents, and real property records. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers clear guidance on preparing and filing the petition, gathering supporting evidence such as the trust document and account statements, and representing clients in Contra Costa County court to help secure a timely ruling that aligns with the settlor’s intent.
A Heggstad petition addresses title discrepancies that arise when trust assets are left in a decedent’s name, offering a focused legal pathway to confirm those assets belong to the trust. The primary benefits include avoiding full probate for the specific asset, providing clear legal authority for trustees to transfer or manage property, and reducing administrative delays. By obtaining a judicial declaration, beneficiaries and financial institutions gain the assurance needed to accept trustee actions. The petition can also help prevent disputes among beneficiaries by clarifying ownership and the settlor’s intent, which supports orderly distribution and trust administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services to residents of Pittsburg and broader Contra Costa County. Our practice focuses on clear, practical solutions for trust issues including Heggstad petitions, trust modifications, pour-over wills, and related filings. We guide clients through document collection, preparing declarations and exhibits, and filing motions or petitions in local court. Our approach emphasizes careful preparation and thoughtful communication with trustees, beneficiaries, and institutions to resolve title questions efficiently and respectfully, helping families carry out the settlor’s wishes while minimizing emotional and financial stress.
A Heggstad petition asks a court to confirm that specific property belongs to a trust despite appearing in the decedent’s name. This situation commonly occurs when a trust was properly funded in intent but not all records or titles were updated before the settlor’s death. The petition relies on evidence such as the trust document, beneficiary designation forms, account statements showing contributions or transfers, and testimony about the settlor’s intent. The court can then enter an order recognizing the trust’s ownership interest, which allows trustees to transfer or manage the asset under the trust without broader probate proceedings for that item.
Heggstad petitions are particularly useful for real property, bank accounts, or securities that were intended to be in the trust but remained titled incorrectly. The process typically includes preparing a formal petition, attaching supporting documentation and declarations, serving necessary parties, and attending a hearing if requested by the court. A successful petition results in a court order confirming title, which third parties such as banks and county recorders accept when effecting transfers. Understanding how evidence is gathered and presented helps trustees prepare a strong filing and anticipate any questions or objections that may arise.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial proceeding recognized in California that seeks a declaration that certain assets are trust property even though those assets remained titled in the settlor’s name. The name comes from a seminal California case interpreting how courts may treat assets intended for trust administration. The petition is grounded in evidence showing the settlor’s intent and actions indicating the asset was meant to be part of the trust, such as transfer instructions, trust funding activity, and contemporaneous records. The court balances documentary and testimonial proof to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property and issue a binding order.
Preparing a Heggstad petition requires assembling specific documentation, drafting a clear petition and declarations, serving interested parties, and filing the matter with the appropriate probate branch of the local superior court. Important elements include a certified copy of the trust or an authenticated trust summary, bank or account records showing intent or contributions, and declarations from the trustee or witnesses describing the settlor’s direction to fund the trust. The court then reviews the record and may hold a hearing. When successful, the court issues an order confirming trust ownership that institutions rely upon to transfer titled assets into the trust or to a trustee.
Understanding common terms will help you follow the petition process and communicate with institutions and the court. Terms such as trust, trustee, settlor, probate, and declaration often arise in filings and hearings. Knowing what documents the court requires and how judges evaluate evidence can make the difference in how smoothly a petition proceeds. This glossary provides concise definitions and practical context for the terms you will encounter during trust administration and Heggstad petition proceedings so you can collect the right materials and explain the situation clearly when seeking a judicial declaration.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a judge to declare that specific property belongs to a trust despite being titled in the name of the deceased settlor. The petition must present convincing documentary and testimonial evidence that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. Typical evidence includes the trust document, financial statements, transfer instructions, and declarations from the trustee or witnesses. When the court grants the petition, it issues an order that third parties accept to transfer title or recognize trust ownership.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs any remaining assets at the decedent’s death to be transferred into an existing trust. It acts as a safety net to capture assets inadvertently left outside the trust. While it ensures the trust receives those assets, assets passing through a pour-over will normally must still go through probate, which is why funding the trust during life and addressing title issues promptly is preferred when possible.
A certification of trust is a condensed, verified summary of a trust used to prove the trust’s existence and the trustee’s authority without revealing the trust’s full terms. Financial institutions and title companies often accept a certification of trust to confirm authority to manage or transfer trust assets. It typically includes key information such as the trust date, trustee names, and statement that the trust is in full force and effect, along with a statement that no revocation has occurred.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a decedent’s estate when assets are titled in the individual’s name, while trust administration often avoids probate when assets are properly held in trust. A Heggstad petition can serve as a hybrid solution by moving individual assets into trust administration through a court declaration, thereby limiting probate to only those items that remain outside the trust. Choosing the right approach depends on asset titling, beneficiaries’ needs, and the nature of the property involved.
When property is in question after a settlor’s death, families can pursue a targeted Heggstad petition to confirm trust ownership for specific assets, or they can open a broader probate proceeding that addresses all assets titled in the decedent’s name. A limited approach focuses on discrete items and can be faster and less disruptive, while probate resolves wider title and creditor matters but involves more oversight and potential delays. Evaluating evidence, asset types, and beneficiary interests helps determine whether a narrow petition or a full probate estate is the more appropriate path for the situation at hand.
A targeted Heggstad petition is often sufficient when only one or a few assets remain incorrectly titled in the decedent’s name and the trust clearly evidences intent to own those assets. For example, a single bank account or a piece of real property that was intended for trust administration can be resolved by presenting the trust document, statements showing funding efforts, and declarations from the trustee or witnesses. This approach can limit court involvement to the asset in question, enabling a quicker transfer without subjecting the entire estate to probate procedures.
A limited petition is appropriate when persuasive documentation supports the claim that the asset belonged to the trust, such as written instructions, account records, or contemporaneous transfer attempts. When the record demonstrates the settlor’s intent and the trustee can present a coherent narrative with supporting exhibits, the court may promptly issue a declaration for the specified asset. Institutions are then more willing to accept the court’s order and cooperate with the trustee to retitle or transfer the property consistent with the trust’s terms.
Comprehensive legal assistance is often needed when numerous assets remain outside the trust or when beneficiaries dispute ownership, value, or trustee actions. In such circumstances, a broader approach may include combined petitions, inventorying assets, creditor notices, and potentially probate proceedings to address competing claims. An extensive review of account histories, title records, and transfer documentation becomes necessary to create a coordinated legal strategy that resolves title issues while protecting beneficiary rights and minimizing delays in administration.
Certain assets, such as retirement accounts with beneficiary designations or property with encumbrances, require careful handling to resolve conflicts between beneficiary designations and trust terms. When titling conflicts involve deeds, liens, or unclear beneficiary forms, a comprehensive legal response helps reconcile competing documents and ensure proper distribution. Preparing full filings, negotiating with financial institutions, and addressing creditor or tax implications often demands a coordinated approach across multiple legal steps to secure a final resolution that reflects the settlor’s intent.
A comprehensive approach to resolving trust funding and title problems reduces the risk of lingering disputes and ensures cohesive administration across all assets. By reviewing account records, beneficiary designations, deeds, and other documentation together, a thorough strategy minimizes the chance of overlooked items that could later require additional filings. This approach also helps coordinate communication with banks, title companies, and county recorders so transfers are completed accurately. Ultimately, a comprehensive plan can deliver a more predictable and orderly distribution process for beneficiaries and trustees alike.
Additionally, addressing all potential issues in a coordinated manner can reduce overall costs and delays compared with resolving problems piecemeal. A comprehensive review identifies assets that are properly titled and those that need corrective actions like Heggstad petitions, affidavits, or deed transfers. When the full picture is handled at once, trustees avoid repeated court filings and multiple rounds of institutional review. Families and trustees benefit from clearer timelines and fewer administrative surprises, which supports steadier progress toward final distribution under the trust instruments.
A comprehensive strategy helps prevent unexpected conflicts by ensuring that all assets, beneficiary designations, and titles are reviewed and reconciled early in the administration process. Proactively addressing inconsistencies and documenting the settlor’s intent minimizes the chances that beneficiaries or institutions will later challenge transfers. When potential issues are resolved up front, trustees can rely on a single, coordinated plan to carry out distributions and to provide clear evidence to third parties that the trust’s terms govern the assets at issue.
Handling all title and documentation matters together allows trustees to present a complete package to banks, title companies, and recorders, reducing back-and-forth requests for additional paperwork. Institutions respond more readily when provided with an organized petition, a certification or copy of the trust, account statements, and clear court orders. This reduces processing times and the likelihood of unexpected rejections, enabling trustees to move assets efficiently toward distribution in accordance with the trust documents.
Begin by collecting the trust document, any amendments, account statements, deeds, beneficiary designation forms, and correspondence that show the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Declarations from trustees or witnesses who were present when funding decisions were discussed can strengthen the petition. Having an organized file with dates and clear descriptions of each asset reduces delays in drafting the petition and helps the court and third parties evaluate the request promptly. Early, thorough documentation often streamlines the process and prevents unnecessary follow-up demands.
When drafting the petition, use organized exhibits and precise declarations that explain the facts and the settlor’s intent. Include labeled exhibits such as account statements, copies of relevant checks or transfer requests, and any correspondence regarding funding. A well-prepared petition allows the court to focus on the substantive evidence rather than procedural gaps. Clear, factual declarations reduce the need for supplemental filings and can help the court issue an order that institutions will accept without additional negotiation.
Consider a Heggstad petition when trust assets were intended to be retitled but remain in the decedent’s name, when banks or title companies refuse to accept trust authority without a court order, or when beneficiaries require judicial clarity about ownership. The petition is a targeted remedy that focuses on correcting title for specific assets and can save time compared with opening a full probate estate for every item. Families often pursue this option to honor the settlor’s wishes and to prevent administrative complications that delay distributions to beneficiaries.
Another common situation is when successor trustees face institutional resistance because account titles do not reflect the trust, or when competing beneficiary designations create uncertainty. A Heggstad petition can resolve these conflicts by producing an authoritative court finding that institutions accept, enabling trustees to proceed. If you encounter refusals to transfer property, or discover assets that were overlooked during funding, pursuing a petition can be a practical and efficient path to finalizing trust administration without broader probate involvement for every contested item.
Typical circumstances include real estate left in the deceased’s name despite trust instructions, bank or brokerage accounts that were intended to be placed in the trust but were not retitled, and retirement or life insurance accounts with ambiguous beneficiary designations that conflict with trust terms. Other triggers include institutional refusal to accept trustee authority and instances where property records show the decedent as owner despite clear documentary evidence that the asset was meant to be trust property. Each scenario benefits from a tailored petition supported by organized evidence and declarations.
Real estate often remains titled in the settlor’s name when deeds were not recorded to reflect trust ownership, leaving successors to seek judicial confirmation. A Heggstad petition for real property relies on the trust document, any deed drafts or transfer attempts, and declarations describing the settlor’s intent. When the court issues an order, the county recorder will typically accept the order and related documents to record a transfer to the trustee or to update title. This resolves the obstacle preventing sale or distribution under the trust.
Accounts intended for trust administration sometimes remain under the decedent’s name due to oversight or administrative delay. Banks and brokerages may decline to honor trustee instructions without a court order. A Heggstad petition supported by statements showing funding activity, copies of beneficiary forms, and trustee declarations can persuade the court to issue a declaration. Once granted, the order enables institutions to retitle accounts or pay balances to the trust, enabling continued management and distribution under the trust terms.
Conflicts between beneficiary designations and trust provisions can create uncertainty about who is entitled to an asset. When the records are ambiguous or suggest competing claims, a Heggstad petition clarifies whether the asset should be treated as trust property. The petition process gathers relevant documents such as beneficiary forms, trust provisions, and account histories to show intent. The court’s finding resolves the conflict and provides a basis for institutions to make distributions consistent with the ruling, avoiding prolonged disputes among claimants.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman is available to assist Pittsburg residents with Heggstad petitions and related trust administration needs. We help trustees obtain the documentation required for a successful filing, prepare declarations and exhibits, and guide clients through local court procedures in Contra Costa County. Our team works with banks, title companies, and recorders to ensure that court orders are accepted and implemented. If you are navigating the post-death administration of a trust and encounter title issues, we provide steady assistance to help resolve those obstacles efficiently.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because we focus on practical, court-ready solutions for trust and title disputes. We prioritize careful document preparation and clear communication with trustees and third parties to reduce delays. From reviewing trust instruments and account histories to drafting precise declarations, we aim to provide predictable progress and respectful handling of sensitive family matters. Our approach emphasizes finding the most efficient route to secure a judicial declaration that institutions will honor.
We also tailor our strategy to the specific facts of each case, whether that requires a targeted Heggstad petition or a broader coordinated filing strategy. We prepare petitions that present evidence in an organized, persuasive fashion and anticipate common questions institutions or the court may raise. By managing procedural requirements and document gathering, we help trustees focus on their fiduciary duties and on communicating with beneficiaries during administration, reducing the administrative burden during what is often an emotional time.
Finally, we assist with the post-order steps that ensure the court’s declaration accomplishes the desired effect: retitling accounts, recording deeds, and submitting orders to banks and brokers. These follow-through tasks are necessary for completing trust administration and ensuring beneficiaries receive distributions according to the trust. Our goal is to deliver clarity and closure so families can move forward with confidence after the court confirms ownership and the trustee completes transfers under the trust documents.
Our process begins with a careful intake to identify the assets at issue and to collect the trust documents, account statements, deed copies, and any other records showing the settlor’s intent. We then draft a petition and supporting declarations, prepare exhibits, and serve interested parties. After filing with the Contra Costa County probate court, we monitor the matter, respond to any objections, and appear at hearings as needed. Once the court issues an order, we assist with submitting the order and required documents to institutions and recorders to effect transfers and complete the administration tasks.
The first step is a detailed assessment of the assets that appear to be trust property but remain titled in the decedent’s name. We identify relevant documentation, request account histories if necessary, and review trustee appointment records and trust amendments. This stage includes collecting copies of deeds, statements, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence that shows the settlor’s intent. A clear file of supporting evidence forms the backbone of a successful petition and helps anticipate potential objections from interested parties or institutions.
We obtain certified copies or authenticated summaries of the trust, any amendments, and related estate planning documents like pour-over wills and HIPAA authorizations. We also request account statements, deed histories, and transaction records that demonstrate the settlor’s actions to fund the trust. This documentation is organized into labeled exhibits that are attached to the petition and declarations so the court has a coherent, chronological record of how the asset was intended to be treated during the settlor’s lifetime.
We interview the successor trustee and any witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent to fund the trust, collecting declarations that clearly describe relevant conversations and actions. These declarations explain the context for transfer attempts and funding decisions, providing the court with firsthand accounts that complement documentary evidence. Carefully drafted witness statements reduce ambiguity and help the court evaluate intent, which is central to a successful petition under California judicial standards.
With the evidence assembled, we prepare the Heggstad petition, attach exhibits, and draft supporting declarations that present the facts in a straightforward manner. The petition sets out the legal basis for a declaration and identifies interested parties who must be served. We ensure proper service and compliance with local procedural rules in Contra Costa County so the filing proceeds without procedural deficiencies that could delay resolution. Accurate drafting and timely service are essential to moving the matter efficiently through the court.
Exhibits are indexed and referenced in the petition to ensure the court can follow the documentary trail. Declarations are drafted to provide context and factual narrative about funding attempts and the settlor’s expressed intent. This coordinated presentation reduces confusion and helps the court make a fact-based determination. Clear cross-references between declarations and exhibits make it easier for judges and staff to review the materials, which supports a timely hearing and decision.
After finalizing the petition, we serve every interested party as required under probate rules and file the documents with the Contra Costa County probate court. Proper service ensures that all potentially affected persons have notice and the opportunity to respond. We also prepare proof of service and any necessary follow-up materials, coordinating with counsel for interested parties if disputes are anticipated. Ensuring procedural compliance reduces the chance of delays caused by service defects or technical errors in filing.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the petition and respond to any objections, emphasizing the factual record and legal bases for a declaration. When the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, we assist the trustee with the practical follow-through: submitting the court order to banks, brokers, and the county recorder, and completing any forms required to retitle property. These post-order steps are critical to ensuring the court’s ruling translates into actual transfers and distributions under the trust.
We prepare for court by organizing oral arguments and evidence summaries, and by anticipating potential objections from interested parties. At the hearing, clear presentation of the documentary record and declarations assists the judge in making a factual determination. If objections arise, we address them with focused responses and, where appropriate, propose practical resolutions. Thorough preparation at this stage improves the likelihood of a prompt ruling and reduces the need for further proceedings.
Once the court issues a favorable order, we provide the trustee with a checklist and prepare the documents needed to present to banks, brokerage firms, and the county recorder. That often includes a certified copy of the order, a certification of trust, and specific transfer forms required by institutions. We follow up to ensure acceptance and recording of deeds or account retitling, confirming that the assets are handled consistent with the trust and that beneficiaries receive distributions as designated.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used in California to obtain a judicial declaration that specific property belongs to a trust even though the property remains titled in the deceased settlor’s name. It is commonly used when a settlor intended to fund a revocable living trust but did not complete the retitling process before death. The petition presents documentary and testimonial evidence of intent, such as the trust document, account statements, transfer attempts, and declarations from trustees or witnesses. The court reviews the evidence and may issue an order confirming ownership in the trust, enabling trustees to manage or transfer the assets accordingly. The petition is targeted to discrete assets rather than serving as a full probate alternative for all estate matters. It is often pursued when banks, recorders, or title companies require judicial confirmation before accepting transfers. While it addresses title for the specific assets named in the petition, other estate matters may still require separate filings. The process prioritizes clarity of ownership and can streamline trust administration for assets that would otherwise be encumbered by institutional refusals or title irregularities.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the completeness of documentation and the local court schedule in Contra Costa County. When records are in order and there are no objections, a petition can sometimes be resolved within a few weeks to a few months, accounting for service periods and any required hearing dates. If the matter proceeds uncontested and the court accepts the written submissions, the process is often quicker than a full probate administration. However, delays can occur when institutions request additional proof or when interested parties raise objections that require further briefing or hearings. Preparing thorough exhibits and well-supported declarations at the outset tends to accelerate review and reduces the risk of adjournments. Conversely, incomplete documentation or competing claims can extend resolution time significantly. Communicating early with banks, title companies, and the court clerk about procedural requirements helps manage expectations. A local attorney can provide a more precise estimate after reviewing the specific assets and documents involved and advising on any likely objections or evidentiary gaps.
Supporting documents typically include a certified copy of the trust or a certification of trust, account statements showing contributions or transfers, any draft or recorded deed, beneficiary designation forms, and contemporaneous correspondence that indicates the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Declarations from the trustee and witnesses who can attest to conversations or steps taken toward funding are commonly used to supplement documentary evidence. Clear labeling of exhibits and chronology of events helps the court and institutions evaluate the claim efficiently. In some cases, additional records such as canceled checks, transfer requests, or statements from financial institutions confirming the settlor’s instructions may be necessary. The requirement for specific documents can vary by institution and by the nature of the asset, so early consultation and targeted document requests reduce the likelihood of follow-up demands. Properly prepared exhibits and declarations often determine whether the court sees the record as sufficiently persuasive to enter a declaration of trust ownership.
A successful Heggstad petition may avoid probate for the particular asset or assets named in the petition by confirming they were part of the trust and allowing the trustee to transfer them without opening a full probate estate. However, it does not automatically avoid probate for all assets that remain in the decedent’s name. If multiple assets are untitled or if estate creditors or other procedural requirements exist, separate probate filings may still be necessary. The petition is a focused remedy to establish trust ownership for specified items rather than a universal substitute for probate in every case. Families often use a Heggstad petition to minimize probate involvement by resolving discrete title errors while leaving other matters to routine trust administration. Determining whether the petition will meaningfully reduce probate exposure requires an inventory of assets and review of titling and beneficiary designations. Trustees should weigh the benefits of targeted petitions against the scope of remaining untitled assets and consider a coordinated plan to address all outstanding administration needs.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties can contest a Heggstad petition by filing objections or responses in the probate court. Common grounds for contest include disputes about the settlor’s intent, the authenticity of documents, or competing claims to the asset. When objections arise, the court evaluates the evidence presented by both sides, and hearings or additional briefing may be necessary. Timely notice to interested parties and clear documentary evidence help reduce the likelihood of contested proceedings, but contests are an acknowledged risk in close or ambiguous situations. If a contest is filed, the process becomes more involved and may require depositions, additional declarations, or trial-style hearings. Resolving contested matters can extend timelines and increase cost. Where disputes are likely, a pragmatic approach includes early communication among parties, clarification of ambiguities in the record, and, where appropriate, negotiation to reach an agreed resolution that avoids prolonged litigation and preserves family relationships when possible.
Courts look for evidence demonstrating the settlor’s intent to have the asset treated as part of the trust. This may include the trust document itself, account statements showing transfers intended for the trust, written instructions, deeds or drafts of deeds, and declarations describing the settlor’s direction to the trustee. The court assesses the totality of the documentary and testimonial evidence, weighing its consistency and credibility. Clear, contemporaneous records are most persuasive in showing that the asset was meant to be held by the trust rather than as an individual asset. Declarations from trustees or witnesses that explain the context for funding attempts and detail conversations with the settlor can be critical in filling evidentiary gaps. The judge exercises discretion based on the facts presented and the legal standards for recognizing trust ownership. Courts tend to favor orderly presentation of evidence, including a coherent timeline and exhibits that directly connect the asset to the trust funding process.
Banks and title companies generally accept a properly executed court order that declares trust ownership but their internal procedures and documentation requirements vary. Some institutions readily honor a certified court order accompanied by a certification of trust, while others may request additional documentation, internal forms, or updated beneficiary designation statements. Communicating early with these institutions to learn their specific requirements reduces the chance of post-order rejections and speeds the retitling process once the court has issued its ruling. If an institution resists accepting the order, follow-up steps can include providing further supporting records, clarifying any ambiguities in the petition, or obtaining supplemental court directions tailored to the institution’s concerns. In rare cases, additional litigation or negotiated solutions may be needed. Anticipating institutional requirements and preparing a comprehensive post-order package increases the likelihood of smooth acceptance and transfer of assets.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include initiating a probate proceeding for assets in the decedent’s name, using small estate procedures where they apply, or negotiating directly with institutions for acceptance of a certification of trust and supporting documents. Probate addresses broader estate administration needs but involves more oversight and potential delay. Small estate affidavits can transfer personal property under statutory thresholds without formal probate, but they are limited by monetary caps and do not apply to real estate in most cases. Another option is to work with institutions to complete their internal transfer processes when documentation is sufficient, though banks and brokers commonly require judicial confirmation for certain title disputes. Choosing the best path depends on asset types, institutional requirements, and whether disputes are likely. A tailored approach balances speed, cost, and certainty to achieve the desired result for trustees and beneficiaries.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary with the complexity of the documentation, the number of assets involved, and whether the matter is contested. Typical expenses include court filing fees, costs for obtaining certified copies, and legal fees associated with preparing the petition, declarations, and exhibits. When proceedings are uncontested and documentation is well organized, fees tend to be more predictable. If objections or hearings become necessary, additional time and expense may be incurred for responses and court appearances. Institutions may also have fees for retitling accounts or recording deeds after an order is issued. Planning for those costs and discussing likely scenarios during an initial consultation helps trustees budget appropriately. Transparent communication about fee structures and anticipated court or institutional expenses provides trustees with a clearer sense of the financial commitment involved in pursuing a Heggstad petition.
To begin, gather the trust document, any amendments, account statements, deeds, beneficiary designation forms, and any written evidence of the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman or another qualified probate and trust attorney for an intake meeting where we will review the documents and outline a recommended strategy. Early assessment helps identify whether a Heggstad petition is the right course or whether alternative procedures are preferable based on the assets and the local court’s practices. After evaluation, we prepare a document checklist, request missing records from institutions if needed, and draft the petition and supporting declarations. We also handle service requirements and follow up with the court and institutions to move the matter forward efficiently. Beginning with organized documentation and local procedural guidance positions the trustee to seek a timely judicial declaration and to proceed with necessary post-order transfers.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas