If you are considering changing a trust established in California, a trust modification petition can provide a formal path to update trust terms, remove or add beneficiaries, or address changes in circumstances since the trust was created. Residents of Pittsburg and Contra Costa County often face questions about whether a trust can be adjusted after it is funded or after the grantor has passed. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients with clear explanations of the legal process and practical considerations, including how state law affects modification options and what documentation is typically required to proceed with a petition in probate court.
A trust modification petition may be necessary when the original terms no longer reflect the available assets, family situations shift, or trustees require clarification of their authority. In many cases, a petition is used to correct administrative issues, resolve ambiguities, or accommodate life events like remarriage, divorce, or changes in tax law. Our approach emphasizes careful review of the trust instrument, applicable California statutes, and court procedures to determine whether a petition is appropriate and to prepare the necessary filings and evidence. This ensures that proposed changes are explained in ways a judge and interested parties can evaluate effectively.
Filing a trust modification petition can preserve the grantor’s intentions while adapting a trust to current realities, such as updated asset types or changed family circumstances. A successful petition can prevent disputes among beneficiaries, clarify trustee powers, and help align the trust with current tax considerations or retirement assets. Bringing proposed changes before the court also creates an official record, which may reduce later conflict and make administration smoother. The process allows interested parties to review and respond, promoting transparency while offering a mechanism to resolve issues where the trust document does not provide a clear solution.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide estate planning and trust administration services from our San Jose office, assisting clients across Contra Costa County, including Pittsburg. Our attorneys focus on careful document review, courtroom preparation when petitions are necessary, and plain-language guidance so clients understand their options and likely outcomes. We prioritize responsiveness and practical problem solving, including working with trustees, beneficiaries, family members, and financial advisors to craft petitions that address legal and factual issues. Our goal is to help clients achieve durable results while minimizing emotional strain and unnecessary expense.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing submitted to a California court to request changes to a trust’s terms, to clarify ambiguous provisions, or to address unforeseen circumstances that affect administration. The petition must explain why the modification is sought, the proposed changes, and who will be affected, while identifying all interested parties. Courts evaluate petitions based on the trust instrument, state law, and whether the requested changes are consistent with the grantor’s intent. Because each case involves unique facts, understanding how local probate courts handle petitions is important for effective preparation and presentation.
Some petitions seek approval of modifications agreed to by beneficiaries and trustees, while others ask the court to intervene when there is disagreement or uncertainty. California law permits different grounds for modification, including mistake, changed circumstances, or correction of administrative errors. The petition process often requires notice to beneficiaries and a hearing where the court considers evidence and arguments. Because notice and procedural requirements must be strictly followed, careful drafting and timely filing are essential to avoid delays or dismissal of the petition.
A trust modification petition asks a court to change, construe, or correct the terms of a trust when circumstances or drafting issues make administration difficult or unfair. The petition describes existing provisions, identifies the proposed amendment, and explains why the change is consistent with the trust’s purpose or necessary to carry out the grantor’s intent. Evidence such as declarations, trust documents, financial statements, and correspondence may accompany the petition. The process includes providing notice to interested parties and attending a hearing where the court decides whether to grant the requested relief based on law and facts presented.
A trust modification petition typically includes a clear statement of the relief sought, supporting facts, citations to relevant California statutes or case law, and a proposed order for the judge to sign if the petition is granted. Supporting documents such as the original trust, any amendments, and evidence of changed circumstances strengthen the petition. Proper service of notice to beneficiaries and trustees is required so interested parties can respond. The court may hold a hearing to assess validity and fairness before approving modifications, and it may impose conditions to protect beneficiaries or ensure accurate administration.
Understanding common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries navigate a petition. Terms often encountered include grantor, trustee, beneficiary, amendment, reformation, decanting, and decedent. Each term has specific legal implications for how a trust is interpreted or altered. For example, reformation addresses mistakes in drafting, while decanting refers to moving assets to a new trust with different terms under statutory authority. Familiarity with these concepts can make communications clearer and help parties evaluate possible approaches to resolving trust-related problems in a legally sound manner.
The grantor, also called the settlor, is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it. The grantor sets the initial terms, names trustees and beneficiaries, and outlines how assets should be managed and distributed. In many trust modification matters, the court considers the grantor’s expressed intentions and whether proposed changes align with those intentions. When the grantor is alive, their preferences carry significant weight; after death, the court examines the trust document and surrounding circumstances to determine whether modification is appropriate to reflect the grantor’s goals.
Reformation refers to a court-ordered correction of a trust when the written document fails to reflect the grantor’s actual intent due to mistake or drafting error. Construction is the court’s interpretation of ambiguous trust language. A petition for reformation typically requires evidence showing the intended terms and the nature of the mistake. Courts exercise caution, balancing respect for the written document with equitable considerations, and will grant reformation only when the record supports a clear need to align the trust text with the grantor’s true intentions.
Decanting is the process of transferring assets from one trust into a new trust with different terms under statutory authority or trustee power. When permitted, decanting can address outdated provisions, change distribution timing, or update trustee powers without direct amendment by the grantor. State law imposes limits on when and how decanting may be used, and the process often requires careful notice to beneficiaries and documentation showing the trustee acted within allowed powers. Decanting is a useful tool but demands careful legal analysis before proceeding.
An amendment is a formal change to the trust document made according to procedures the grantor set out, often while the grantor is alive and has capacity. Modification may involve court action to alter terms after creation or to resolve ambiguity, administrative problems, or changed circumstances. When a trust allows amendment by the grantor, that route is often simpler; when an amendment is not possible, a modification petition can provide judicial authority to change terms. The choice depends on the trust’s language, the grantor’s current status, and applicable California law.
When considering changes to a trust, parties may evaluate informal amendment by the grantor, statutory decanting by a trustee, or a court-ordered modification through a petition. Each option has different procedural requirements and legal consequences. An amendment by the grantor is straightforward when possible, while decanting can be useful for trustees with the power to do so. A court petition becomes necessary when there is no clear authority to amend or when disagreements arise. Understanding the pros and cons of each route helps clients choose an approach that balances legal compliance, cost, and the likelihood of achieving the desired outcome.
A limited approach such as a homeowner amendment or an administrative clarification is often appropriate when the grantor is alive and able to sign a document that clearly alters or clarifies trust terms. Minor changes like updating contact information, naming a successor trustee, or correcting obvious typographical errors may be addressed without court involvement. When all interested parties agree and the trust language allows for straightforward amendment, informal steps can save time and costs. Clear documentation and proper execution remain important to prevent later disputes or challenges to the validity of the change.
Trustees sometimes have authority under the trust to make administrative decisions that remove the need for a court petition, such as consolidating accounts, changing investment strategies, or making distributions permitted by the trust terms. If the issue is procedural rather than substantive, following the trust’s built-in processes and keeping beneficiaries informed can prevent escalation. Trustees should document their decisions and provide required notices so beneficiaries understand the rationale, which reduces the likelihood of objections and preserves trust administration efficiency without resorting to court involvement.
Comprehensive legal action, including filing a trust modification petition, becomes necessary when the trust instrument is ambiguous, conflicting, or silent about a specific issue and the parties cannot reach agreement. Court involvement is also appropriate if there is a credible claim that the trust contains a drafting mistake, if there are competing interpretations that affect distributions, or if a trustee’s authority is in dispute. In such cases, a petition provides a formal forum for presenting evidence and achieving an enforceable resolution that governs future administration.
When a trust holds complex assets like business interests, retirement accounts, or property across multiple jurisdictions, or when beneficiary relationships change significantly, a detailed legal review and potentially court intervention can help ensure distributions and tax consequences are handled correctly. A modification petition can clarify how such assets should be treated, protect the rights of vulnerable beneficiaries, and provide structured relief to trustees who need authority to act. These steps reduce the chance of costly litigation later by creating an authoritative, court-approved plan for administration.
A comprehensive approach combines careful legal analysis, thorough documentation, and strategic court filings when necessary to address all aspects of a trust’s issues. This approach reduces ambiguity, lowers the risk of future disputes among beneficiaries, and creates a clear administrative path for trustees. Addressing both legal and factual complexities in a single, coordinated effort can prevent piecemeal fixes that create new problems. By considering tax, family, and asset management implications, a comprehensive plan seeks durable solutions that support smooth trust administration over time.
Working comprehensively also ensures that necessary notices are provided, interested parties have the opportunity to be heard, and the court record reflects the rationale for changes. This transparency can increase beneficiary confidence and reduce the likelihood of later challenges. A well-prepared petition anticipates objections and addresses them with evidence and legal argument, helping the court make an informed decision. As a result, trustees and beneficiaries receive clearer instructions for carrying out distributions and managing trust assets according to the revised terms.
One primary benefit of a comprehensive approach is creating legal certainty about the trust’s terms and the trustee’s authority, which often reduces disputes among beneficiaries. When a court approves modifications, the resulting order provides a strong basis for consistent administration and can deter challenges by clarifying the legal framework. Comprehensive preparation also documents the reasons for changes and the evidence supporting them, which helps the court and parties understand how the revised terms align with the grantor’s intentions and why they serve the trust’s purpose over time.
A comprehensive resolution promotes efficient trust administration by providing trustees with clear directions and legal authority to act, which helps prevent delays in distributions and asset management tasks. It also protects beneficiaries’ interests by ensuring that potential conflicts are addressed in a single proceeding rather than through ongoing disputes. Taking a thorough approach reduces the likelihood of future litigation and can include provisions that anticipate trustee needs, tax considerations, and the practicalities of managing unusual assets, offering a durable framework for the trust’s long-term administration.
Start by collecting the original trust document, all amendments, and related estate planning papers such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and trust certifications. Include any correspondence or notes that shed light on the grantor’s intentions and any transactions affecting trust assets. Organizing bank statements, account titles, property deeds, and retirement plan documentation will help identify assets subject to the trust and whether special handling is required. Well-organized records make drafting a persuasive petition and presenting evidence at a hearing more streamlined and credible to the court and interested parties.
When drafting a petition, anticipate questions or objections that beneficiaries might raise, and attach supporting evidence to address them proactively. Evidence can include declarations from trustees, affidavits about changed circumstances, financial records, and documentation showing the grantor’s intent where available. Addressing likely concerns in the petition narrative helps the court evaluate the proposal and can shorten the time to resolution. Thorough preparation demonstrates that the proposed modification is reasonable, proportionate to the issues, and structured to protect beneficiaries’ interests.
Pittsburg residents might seek a trust modification petition when life events or changes in assets make the original trust terms impractical or unfair. Common triggers include divorce, remarriage, death of a beneficiary, changes in financial circumstances, or acquisition of substantial new assets such as business interests or real property. Petitions are also sought to correct drafting mistakes or to clarify trustee powers when the document is ambiguous. When simple amendments are not possible, a court petition provides a formal avenue to align trust administration with current realities while preserving the grantor’s broader intentions.
Another reason to consider a petition is to obtain judicial approval for actions that protect vulnerable beneficiaries or resolve disputes among family members. Courts can issue orders that authorize trustee decisions, approve distributions, and set conditions that protect estate assets. Petition-driven resolutions often reduce long-term uncertainty and help trustees avoid legal exposure when facing difficult choices. For Pittsburg and Contra Costa County families, pursuing a well-prepared petition can minimize emotional stress, provide clarity for the future, and ensure the trust operates in a manner consistent with applicable law.
Several recurring situations prompt trust modification petitions, including unclear beneficiary designations, changes in asset type or location, disputes over trustee authority, and identified drafting errors. Events such as the death of a grantor or beneficiary, divorce, or a beneficiary’s special needs can create urgency for modification. When a trust lacks mechanisms to deal with new circumstances or when parties disagree about interpretation, the court can be asked to resolve those issues. Understanding these typical scenarios helps families recognize when a petition may be the most appropriate course of action.
Shifts in family relationships, like divorce, remarriage, or the birth of grandchildren, can make original trust instructions outdated or inconsistent with current wishes. These changes often lead to questions about beneficiary designations or whether distributions should follow the prior plan. When the grantor cannot amend the trust directly or when beneficiaries disagree about how to proceed, a modification petition can update or clarify distribution provisions. Courts review the trust language and relevant evidence to determine whether proposed changes accord with the grantor’s intent and serve the trust’s long-term purpose.
Drafting mistakes or omissions discovered after execution of a trust can create uncertainty about the grantor’s wishes and lead to administration problems. Examples include ambiguous distribution language, missing successor trustee provisions, or references to assets that were later retitled. A petition for reformation or clarification asks the court to correct or interpret the document so trustees can administer the trust as intended. Evidence such as contemporaneous notes, drafts, or statements about the grantor’s intent can support a petition seeking to align the written instrument with the original plan.
When trusts include complex assets like business interests, retirement plans, or property in multiple states, administration becomes more complicated and may require judicial guidance to ensure proper treatment. Similarly, significant changes in financial circumstances may render original distribution formulas impractical or inequitable. A modification petition can provide a court-approved method for handling such assets or adjusting distributions to reflect new realities. This helps trustees manage assets responsibly and ensures beneficiaries receive fair outcomes under updated terms.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve Pittsburg and nearby communities with focused support for trust modification matters, including petition preparation, notice procedures, and representation at hearings when needed. We assist trustees and beneficiaries by reviewing trust documents, identifying suitable grounds for modification, and preparing clear petitions that present evidence and legal argument in a manner the court can evaluate. Our team aims to make the process understandable and manageable, guiding clients through each step and coordinating with financial or tax professionals when complex asset issues arise.
Choosing a legal team to assist with a trust modification petition matters because procedural errors, incomplete notice, or weak supporting evidence can delay relief or jeopardize intended outcomes. Our attorneys focus on careful document review, procedural compliance, and persuasive presentation to help clients obtain clear, enforceable court orders when needed. We also prioritize direct communication and practical solutions that reflect the realities of family dynamics and asset management, helping trustees and beneficiaries navigate a sometimes-sensitive process with clarity and respect.
We work to streamline the petition process by preparing thorough pleadings, organizing relevant exhibits, and drafting proposed orders that assist the court in granting appropriate relief. For trustees seeking authority or beneficiaries seeking clarification, we explain the options, potential timelines, and likely impacts of different approaches. Our goal is to reduce surprises, avoid unnecessary litigation where possible, and achieve legally sound results that facilitate effective trust administration going forward, tailored to the needs of Pittsburg families and Contra Costa County residents.
When matters are contested, we advocate for clients in court while maintaining a focus on resolution and practical outcomes. That includes negotiating agreements among parties when appropriate and preparing supporting declarations and exhibits that reflect the factual record. For uncontested petitions, we handle filings and notices efficiently to move requests through the court system. We also coordinate with accountants, financial advisors, and trust officers when complex assets or tax consequences require input to support the proposed modifications.
Our process begins with a detailed review of the trust and related estate planning documents, followed by identifying the appropriate legal basis for a petition and the parties who must be notified. We prepare the petition, gather supporting evidence, and propose orders that reflect the relief sought. After service and applicable waiting periods, we represent clients at hearings and respond to objections. Throughout, we aim to keep clients informed of timelines, costs, and possible outcomes so they can make informed decisions about proceeding toward a judicial resolution.
Initial case evaluation involves collecting the trust, amendments, financial records, and any correspondence that explains the grantor’s intent or documents the change in circumstances. We identify all interested parties and assess whether an amendment, decanting, or court petition is the most appropriate path. This stage also includes evaluating timing, potential objections, and whether interim actions are needed to protect trust assets. A thorough preliminary review sets the foundation for drafting a persuasive petition and anticipating the court’s concerns.
We examine the trust instrument, amendments, wills, powers of attorney, beneficiary designations, and account titles to determine the legal framework governing the trust. Gathering contemporaneous notes, declarations, or communications that reflect the grantor’s intentions can be important for petitions seeking reformation or clarification. We also assess whether formal notice requirements are impacted by asset types or beneficiary addresses. This careful fact-gathering helps identify the strongest legal arguments and ensures the petition accurately reflects the circumstances that justify modification.
Determining who must receive notice is essential to the petition process. Interested parties typically include current and successor trustees, beneficiaries, anyone named in the trust or related instruments, and potentially creditors or other claimants. We ensure that service meets California probate rules and that required notices accompany the petition to prevent procedural challenges. Clear notice procedures also provide transparency and an opportunity for parties to raise concerns early, which can sometimes lead to negotiated resolutions that avoid contested hearings.
Drafting the petition involves explaining the requested relief, providing supporting facts and legal authority, and attaching pertinent documents and declarations. We propose specific language for the court order that reflects the intended changes and practical directions for the trustee. Filing with the appropriate probate court triggers statutory notice requirements and begins the clock for responses. Preparing a petition with clear, organized exhibits and a concise narrative helps the court evaluate the request efficiently and can reduce the need for extensive discovery or multiple hearings.
Supporting declarations from trustees, financial professionals, or witnesses provide factual context for the petition and demonstrate why modification is appropriate. Exhibits such as trust documents, account statements, and property records should be organized and clearly referenced in the petition. Well-prepared exhibits make the court’s review more efficient and strengthen the factual record if objections arise. Attention to detail in this stage increases the likelihood that the court will understand the rationale for the requested modification and act on a complete evidentiary basis.
After filing, the petition must be properly served on all interested parties according to California probate procedure, which may include personal service, mail, or substituted service depending on the circumstances. Proof of service is typically filed with the court. Timely and accurate service prevents procedural objections that could delay proceedings. Once service is complete, parties have an opportunity to respond, and the court sets a hearing date where the petition will be considered. Clear documentation of service and filing details supports a smooth process.
At the hearing, the court evaluates the petition, considers objections, and reviews supporting evidence before deciding whether to grant the requested relief. If the court approves modification, it issues an order that becomes part of the official record and guides future trust administration. Implementation may require updating account titles, communicating new instructions to financial institutions, or recording revised documents. The order often includes directions to protect beneficiaries and ensure the trustee can carry out the revised terms without further dispute.
We prepare clients and present evidence at hearings to explain the rationale for modification and respond to any objections raised by interested parties. Our aim is to present a clear factual and legal case that helps the court reach a practical and lawful decision. Hearings provide an opportunity to resolve conflicts and obtain an authoritative order that removes uncertainty. Effective courtroom presentation and reasoned argument support the goal of securing a durable resolution that trustees can implement with confidence.
Once the court signs an order approving a modification, we assist clients in implementing the change, which may include re-titling assets, updating beneficiary information, and notifying institutions about the new directives. Proper implementation ensures the court’s intent is reflected in day-to-day administration and reduces the chance of future disputes. We help trustees prepare documentation for financial institutions and other entities to effect the changes, providing a clear paper trail that aligns the administrative actions with the court-approved order.
A trust modification petition is generally justified when the trust document is ambiguous, contains a drafting error, or when changed circumstances make the original terms impractical. Common situations include the death or incapacity of a key beneficiary, significant changes in asset composition, or discovery of language that does not reflect the grantor’s intent. Courts examine the specific facts and the trust instrument to determine whether modification is consistent with the grantor’s goals and with California law. Gathering clear documentation that shows why the change is needed strengthens the petition and helps the court understand the issues at hand. Filing a petition is also appropriate when trustees face legal uncertainty about their authority or when disputes among beneficiaries impede administration. Seeking judicial approval can create an authoritative order that clarifies trustee powers and sets conditions for distributions or asset management. This formal resolution reduces the likelihood of later litigation by providing a judicially enforceable path forward. Preparing a well-supported petition, including declarations and exhibits that explain the circumstances and proposed changes, increases the chance of a timely and favorable outcome.
Trustees may have limited authority under the trust document to make administrative adjustments, and some trusts include express powers allowing trustees to address certain issues without court approval. Actions like managing investments, making distributions within the trust’s guidelines, or correcting minor administrative errors can often be handled through trustee decisions, provided those actions fall within the trustee’s written powers. It is important to review the trust language carefully to determine what actions are permissible without court involvement and to document the trustee’s rationale for the chosen course of action. When proposed changes go beyond administrative powers or when beneficiaries disagree with the trustee’s proposed course, court approval through a petition may be necessary. Seeking judicial guidance protects trustees from potential personal liability by obtaining authorization for significant changes, such as altering distribution terms, decanting substantial assets, or resolving contested interpretations of the trust. Proper notice to interested parties and careful documentation of the trustee’s reasoning help justify seeking court approval when informal resolution is not possible.
The timeline for a trust modification petition can vary depending on the complexity of the issues, the completeness of documentation, and the probate court’s schedule. Simple, uncontested petitions with clear supporting evidence can sometimes be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, while contested matters involving multiple parties, complex assets, or disputes over intent may take longer. Preparation time for gathering documents, drafting declarations, and serving notice also contributes to the overall timeline, so early and thorough preparation helps expedite the process. Court scheduling and responses from interested parties influence the duration as well. If beneficiaries object, additional proceedings, discovery, or hearings may be required, extending the timeline. Working with counsel to anticipate likely objections and to prepare a detailed petition can reduce delays. When time-sensitive actions are necessary to protect trust assets, interim relief may be sought to provide trustees the authority to act while the petition is pending.
Yes, California probate rules require notice to interested parties when a trust modification petition is filed, and proper service is a key procedural requirement. Interested parties typically include current and successor trustees, named beneficiaries, and others identified in the trust or related documents. Notice gives parties the opportunity to review the petition and raise concerns, which promotes transparency and helps prevent surprise objections at the hearing. Proof of service must usually be filed with the court to demonstrate compliance with procedural rules. Providing clear notice early in the process can sometimes lead to negotiated agreements that avoid contested hearings. When beneficiaries understand the reasons for a proposed modification and can review supporting documents, they may be more inclined to cooperate or discuss alternatives. If a beneficiary objects after receiving notice, the court will consider their objections during the hearing and evaluate the factual and legal support for both sides before issuing an order.
To seek reformation of a trust, parties typically need to present clear and convincing evidence that the written trust document fails to reflect the grantor’s actual intent due to a mistake or drafting error. Evidence can include earlier drafts, correspondence, declarations describing conversations with the grantor, and any contemporaneous notes that demonstrate what the grantor intended. Affidavits from individuals who were present when the trust was executed or who discussed the grantor’s wishes can be helpful, though courts evaluate such evidence carefully and require a reliable factual record to justify reformation. The stronger and more specific the evidence about the grantor’s intent, the more persuasive the petition will be. Courts are cautious about rewriting trust documents without a solid evidentiary foundation. Presenting coherent, corroborated documentation that explains the nature of the mistake and the precise change sought increases the likelihood that the court will find reformation appropriate and grant the requested relief.
Decanting involves a trustee transferring assets from an existing trust into a new trust with different terms under statutory authority or the trustee’s reserved powers, when such action is permitted by law and the trust instrument. Decanting can be an efficient administrative tool to update terms, change distribution timing, or add trustee powers without initiating court proceedings, provided statutory requirements and notice obligations are met. The process is governed by state law and may have limits depending on the nature of the trust and the trustee’s powers.
Modifications to trust terms can have tax consequences depending on the nature of the change and the types of assets involved. Changes that affect distributions or beneficiary interests could alter estate, income, or gift tax considerations. For example, shifting beneficial interests or changing the timing of distributions may impact how certain assets are treated for tax purposes. Because tax rules can be complex and may differ based on asset type, it is often advisable to consult a tax professional when contemplating significant trust modifications to understand potential consequences and structure changes to minimize unintended tax effects.
If a beneficiary objects to a petition, the court will consider the objection and may schedule additional hearings, request further evidence, or order limited discovery to resolve factual disputes. Objections can stem from concerns about the grantor’s intent, perceived unfairness of proposed changes, or alleged trustee misconduct. Addressing objections usually requires presenting evidence and legal argument to show why the requested modification is appropriate and consistent with the trust’s purpose. In some cases, mediation or negotiation between parties can resolve disagreements without extended litigation.
Alternatives to filing a petition include seeking an amendment directly from the grantor if they are alive and have capacity, using trustee powers such as decanting when available, or negotiating a settlement among beneficiaries. Mediation can be a productive avenue to reach consensus without involving the court, especially when parties are willing to compromise. For administrative issues, trustees can sometimes take corrective actions that do not require judicial approval. Each alternative has limits and may not be available depending on the trust language, the grantor’s status, or existing disputes.
To protect a trustee who needs authority to act, parties can seek a court order through a petition that expressly grants the requested powers and shields the trustee from personal liability when acting within the order’s terms. The court can issue directions that clarify permitted actions, set conditions for distributions, and approve agreements with beneficiaries. Documenting the trustee’s decision-making process, seeking consents where possible, and following court orders help reduce exposure. Clear, court-approved authority provides trustees with confidence to manage trust assets and carry out administration in line with the court’s instructions.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas