A Heggstad petition is a legal process used when trust property was intended to be transferred but paperwork or title changes were not completed before a grantor passed away. In Rodeo and throughout Contra Costa County, family members and trustees may encounter assets that should belong to a trust but remain titled in a decedent’s name. This guide explains how a Heggstad petition can help clarify ownership and move assets into a trust for administration or distribution, offering a path to align estate administration with the decedent’s documented estate planning instruments and apparent intentions.
When assets intended for a trust are still titled in the name of the deceased, a Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize those assets as part of the trust. This process helps trustees obtain legal authority to manage or distribute such property without lengthy disputes. In many cases, the petition relies on evidence like trust documents, beneficiary designations, emails, and witness testimony to demonstrate that the decedent intended to place assets into the trust. The petition seeks a judicial finding that the property should be treated as trust property for administration and distribution purposes.
A Heggstad petition can prevent delay and conflict by formally recognizing trust ownership of mis-titled assets, reducing obstacles to smooth administration. When the court rules that certain property belongs to the trust, trustees gain clear authority to manage, sell, or distribute those assets under the trust terms, which helps avoid probate for those items. This judicial clarity also helps beneficiaries understand their rights and reduces the chance of future litigation. For families dealing with estate transitions, the petition can be an efficient solution to align administration with the grantor’s documented intent and preserve estate value.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients throughout the Bay Area with trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions and related probate filings. Our team focuses on clear communication, careful document review, and court procedures that move cases forward efficiently. We guide trustees and family members through gathering supporting evidence, drafting petitions, and presenting the factual record needed to show that the decedent intended for the property to be held by the trust. Clients receive practical counsel about options, timelines, and potential outcomes tailored to their situation and California law.
A Heggstad petition is a targeted legal remedy used when there is strong evidence that a decedent intended certain property to be part of a trust but the asset was never retitled. The procedure asks the probate court to declare that the asset should be treated as trust property for purposes of distribution and administration. Typical evidence includes trust documents, transfer forms, beneficiary designations, and testimony about the decedent’s intentions. The outcome can eliminate uncertainty, allowing trustees to deal with assets under the trust’s terms rather than through probate processes that can be lengthier and more costly.
In many Heggstad cases, establishing the decedent’s intent is the central issue. Courts look at contemporaneous documents and credible testimony to determine whether title or paperwork failures were mere technicalities rather than deliberate choices. If successful, the ruling places the assets inside the trust for administration and distribution, preserving the grantor’s intent. The petition is an alternative to a full probate estate administration for those assets, helping families and trustees resolve ownership questions without prolonged litigation or unnecessary expense when evidence supports trust ownership.
A Heggstad petition requests that the court declare certain property belongs to a trust despite title remaining in the decedent’s name. The petition presents evidence showing that the decedent intended to transfer the asset to the trust during life. The court then evaluates documents, affidavits, and witness testimony to determine whether the transfer was intended but incompletely executed. If the petition succeeds, the asset is treated as trust property and subject to trust administration procedures. This remedy clarifies ownership and supports distribution according to the trust instrument rather than through probate.
A successful Heggstad petition typically includes a clear showing of the trust instrument, evidence of the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust, and documentation of attempts or plans to transfer title. The petition must be filed in the appropriate probate court, and notice must be given to interested parties. The process often involves assembling deeds, account records, correspondence, and sworn statements. The court then reviews the record and may hold a hearing. If the court determines the evidence supports inclusion in the trust, it issues an order recognizing trust ownership of the asset.
Understanding common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the Heggstad petition process. Definitions clarify what courts examine and what documents are persuasive. This section provides plain-language explanations of legal phrases commonly used in petition filings, including trust instruments, decedent, trustee powers, and evidentiary requirements. Knowing these terms can make it easier to gather the right documents and prepare credible statements that show the decedent intended a transfer to the trust. Clear terminology also aids communication with counsel and the court during the petition process.
A trust instrument is the written document that establishes the trust, names the trustee and beneficiaries, and sets out the terms for management and distribution of trust assets. For a Heggstad petition, the trust instrument is central because it demonstrates the grantor’s plan for assets and the authority granted to the trustee. Courts will review the trust document to confirm the grantor’s intent and the trustee’s powers. Clear language in the trust about what assets belong to the trust and how they should be handled strengthens a petition seeking to treat mis-titled property as trust property.
Decedent’s intent refers to the settlor or grantor’s demonstrated desire regarding ownership and distribution of assets, as expressed in documents, communications, and behavior prior to death. In a Heggstad petition, proof of intent is essential: the court looks for contemporaneous evidence such as trust provisions, transfer instructions, or other records that show an unmistakable plan to include the property in the trust. Statements from witnesses and relevant writings that align with the trust terms can help the court conclude the decedent meant the asset to be trust property despite title anomalies.
A trustee is the person or entity appointed to manage trust assets and carry out the instructions contained in the trust instrument. When filing a Heggstad petition, the trustee typically brings the petition to obtain legal recognition that certain assets belong to the trust so they can be administered according to the trust terms. The trustee must act in the beneficiaries’ best interests, provide appropriate notices, and gather evidence supporting the transfer intent. Court approval via a Heggstad order clarifies the trustee’s authority over disputed or mis-titled property.
A probate court order resolving a Heggstad petition formally declares the ownership status of the disputed property, directing that it be treated as trust property for administration and distribution. This order provides legal authority to the trustee to manage or transfer the asset under the trust’s terms. It helps prevent future disagreements by making a public record of the court’s decision. The order may also outline any required notices, conditions, or steps the trustee must take to effectuate the transfer or handling of the asset in a manner consistent with California law.
When mis-titled assets surface, interested parties can consider a Heggstad petition, a full probate administration, or various corrective transactions. A Heggstad petition is typically more focused and faster than opening a full probate estate, since it targets specific assets with supporting evidence of trust intent. However, if the decedent had other assets that require probate, a broader probate proceeding may be necessary. Consulting with counsel helps determine whether a petition or another route best aligns with the available evidence, the estate’s complexity, and the desired timeline for resolution.
A targeted Heggstad petition can be appropriate when only one or a small number of assets were never retitled but there is clear evidence that the grantor intended those assets to be in the trust. In such cases, pursuing a focused petition often resolves title and administration issues more quickly and with less expense than opening a full probate estate. Documentary proof and credible witness statements showing intent are typically sufficient for the court to recognize the asset as trust property, allowing trustees to move forward with management or distribution under the trust terms.
When contemporaneous documents such as trust pages, transfer instructions, or signed forms exist alongside reliable witness testimony, a focused petition is often sufficient to obtain a court ruling that the asset belongs to the trust. The court examines the quality of the evidence and the consistency of statements. If these materials collectively demonstrate the decedent’s intention to include the asset in the trust, the petition route can be an efficient means to secure a legal determination without the broader scope and procedural burden of probate administration.
A comprehensive approach becomes necessary when there are numerous mis-titled assets, potential creditor claims, or disputes among beneficiaries about ownership or distribution. In such situations, a full probate administration or more extensive court proceedings may be needed to address all issues effectively and ensure proper notice to interested parties. Handling multiple overlapping claims often requires coordinated filings, detailed accounting, and careful procedural steps to protect the rights of beneficiaries while following California law for estate resolution and trust administration.
Complex situations involving financial accounts with conflicting designations, real property with title defects, or assets subject to liens may call for a broader legal strategy. A comprehensive approach helps untangle title complications, negotiate with creditors, and resolve competing interests before distribution. This may involve multiple filings, coordination with county recorders, and careful legal analysis of trust language and beneficiary rights. When the facts are complicated, a thorough process protects estate value and reduces the risk of future litigation over improperly handled assets.
Choosing the right legal pathway—whether a focused Heggstad petition or a broader probate strategy—can preserve estate value and reduce conflict. A well-chosen approach clarifies ownership, provides authority for trustees to act, and creates a transparent record for beneficiaries and third parties. It also helps ensure notice requirements are met and that distributions follow the decedent’s intentions or governing law. By aligning the process with the complexity of the estate, trustees and families can minimize delays and the chance of future disputes over mis-titled assets.
A thoughtful legal strategy balances speed, cost, and completeness of resolution. Where a Heggstad petition will clear title to specific assets, it can save time and expense compared with full probate. In cases where broader oversight protects against competing claims or multiple title defects, a more complete process prevents missed steps that could lead to litigation. The right approach provides beneficiaries with a clear path to distribution while safeguarding the trustee’s ability to act in accordance with the trust instrument and applicable California procedures.
When a Heggstad petition addresses a narrow title problem supported by solid evidence, the court can often reach a decision more quickly than in a full probate proceeding. Faster resolution allows trustees to manage or distribute assets without extended delays, reducing costs for the estate and providing beneficiaries with timely access to trust property. By targeting only the assets that need correction, families can avoid unnecessary complexity and focus on completing administration tasks required by the trust instrument and California law.
A judicial finding that certain property belongs to a trust creates a clear legal record that supports trustee actions and protects beneficiaries’ interests. That certainty helps prevent future disputes and provides banks, title companies, and other institutions with authority to recognize the trustee’s role. Clear court orders minimize ambiguity about ownership and distribution, enabling trustees to proceed with sales, transfers, or distributions under the trust terms with confidence. Establishing legal clarity also reduces the risk of subsequent challenges to transactions carried out in reliance on the court’s determination.
Start collecting all relevant documents as soon as a mis-titled asset is discovered. Useful items include the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, transfer instructions, beneficiary designation forms, emails, and any notes or letters showing the decedent’s intent. Sworn statements from witnesses who observed the decedent’s planning activities can also be helpful. Having a well-organized file streamlines preparation of the petition and strengthens the factual record for the court, which can lead to faster resolution and more predictable outcomes in the petition process.
Evaluate whether a Heggstad petition alone is the right path or whether other estate proceedings are advisable given the overall estate picture. If there are multiple mis-titled assets, creditor issues, or conflicting beneficiary claims, a broader approach may be necessary to fully protect rights and satisfy legal requirements. Balancing speed and thoroughness ensures the chosen procedure aligns with the estate’s needs and the trust instrument’s instructions. Taking a holistic view prevents missed steps that could cause problems later in administration or distribution.
Filing a Heggstad petition is often considered when assets intended for the trust were never retitled and the trustee needs legal confirmation to manage or distribute them. The petition provides a focused judicial remedy that can be faster and less costly than opening a full probate estate for those particular assets. It clarifies ownership for third parties such as banks and title companies and allows trustees to act under the trust’s terms. Families seeking to honor the decedent’s documented intentions often find the petition an effective way to align administration with the trust instrument.
Clients may also pursue a Heggstad petition to avoid delays and uncertainty that can arise when assets remain in a decedent’s name. By presenting a record that demonstrates the grantor intended the asset for the trust, a petition can secure a court order recognizing trust ownership and enabling timely action. Where evidence is strong and the issue is limited in scope, the petition can reduce the administrative burden and allow trustees to proceed with sales, transfers, or distributions consistent with the trust, providing closure for beneficiaries and financial institutions involved.
Typical situations that prompt a Heggstad petition include real property left titled in the decedent’s name, bank or investment accounts not retitled to the trust, and assets for which transfer paperwork was prepared but never recorded. Other circumstances include accounts with beneficiary designations inconsistent with trust planning or assets mistakenly omitted from trust schedules. When the trust instrument and other evidence demonstrate the decedent’s intent, a petition helps resolve ownership questions so trustees can administer the property according to the trust terms.
Real estate intended for a trust but never deeded into the trust often requires a court determination to allow trust administration or sale. A Heggstad petition presents the trust document and supporting evidence to show the grantor directed that the property be part of the trust. With a favorable ruling, the trustee gains authority to manage or transfer the property under the trust terms. This process helps avoid title disputes and enables a smoother transition of real property according to the grantor’s estate plan.
Accounts intended to be held by the trust but left in the decedent’s name can create administrative obstacles and potential delays. A Heggstad petition can request a court declaration that such accounts are trust property based on the trust instrument and supporting records. Once recognized by the court, trustees can access and manage funds in accordance with the trust, enabling distributions or payments that the trust requires. This resolution prevents unnecessary probate for those specific accounts and clarifies the trustee’s authority.
When beneficiary designations, account titling, or deed records conflict with a trust document, a Heggstad petition can help sort out ownership by presenting evidence of the decedent’s intent. The court evaluates whether transfer formalities were merely incomplete and whether the trust controls the asset. Resolving these conflicts through a petition creates a clear legal basis for trustee actions and reduces the likelihood of subsequent disputes among beneficiaries or third parties who may otherwise contest how the asset should be handled.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers guidance to trustees and families in Rodeo who face mis-titled assets intended for a trust. We help gather evidence, prepare the petition, and manage court filings and notices required under California probate rules. Our approach emphasizes clear explanations, realistic timelines, and practical next steps tailored to the estate’s facts. Whether a single account or real property is at issue, we work to secure the legal recognition needed so trustees can administer trust property with authority and confidence.
Clients choose our firm because we offer focused representation for trust administration matters in Contra Costa County, including Heggstad petitions. We take a methodical approach to document review, evidence collection, and court filings designed to present a persuasive record of the decedent’s intent. Our role is to guide trustees and family members through each procedural step, explain legal options, and pursue a resolution that aligns with the trust instrument while minimizing delay and cost for the estate and beneficiaries.
We prioritize clear communication and responsive service so clients understand what to expect during the petition process. From identifying which documents will support the petition to preparing required notices for interested parties, we handle technical tasks and procedural requirements to reduce stress on trustees and families. Our goal is to obtain court recognition of trust ownership where the evidence supports it, enabling trustees to manage or distribute assets in accordance with the trust and applicable California rules.
Our firm can also advise when a Heggstad petition should be part of a broader estate administration strategy, coordinating with other filings when necessary to protect estate value and satisfy creditor or beneficiary rights. We assist clients in evaluating alternatives, estimating timelines, and determining the most effective route to resolve title issues. Through careful preparation and courtroom practice, we help trustees move forward while maintaining compliance with procedural and substantive requirements in California probate courts.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust documents and the mis-titled asset’s records to assess whether a petition is appropriate. We identify needed supporting evidence, prepare the petition and declarations, and coordinate required notices to beneficiaries and other interested parties. We file the petition in the appropriate probate court and represent the trustee at any hearings. Throughout, we keep clients informed of timelines and options, aiming to secure a clear court order that permits trust administration or distribution consistent with the trust terms.
The initial step involves collecting trust instruments, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence that sheds light on the decedent’s intentions. We review these materials to evaluate the strength of evidence that the asset was intended for the trust. This assessment determines whether a focused Heggstad petition or a broader legal approach is most appropriate. We then outline the evidence that will be needed to present a persuasive petition to the probate court and explain the likely timelines and potential outcomes.
Gathering a complete set of trust-related documents is essential. This includes the trust instrument, any amendments, schedules, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and correspondence indicating the decedent’s intent. Sworn declarations from witnesses who observed the decedent’s estate planning actions can strengthen the record. A carefully compiled file helps the petition clearly show why the court should recognize the asset as trust property, reducing the need for supplemental discovery or extended evidentiary disputes in court.
After documents are assembled, we identify individuals who can provide helpful testimony and determine which records best demonstrate the decedent’s intent. Statements should be timely and consistent with the trust instrument. In some cases, communications with financial institutions or records of attempted transfers provide persuasive support. We plan how to present this evidence to the court in declarations and exhibits that clearly connect the decedent’s intent to the asset in question, streamlining the petition process.
Once evidence is organized, we draft the petition, including factual declarations and supporting exhibits that present the case to the probate court. The petition details the trust instrument, the asset at issue, and the factual basis for treating the asset as trust property. We ensure that notice requirements are met and that the petition complies with local court rules. Properly prepared filings increase the likelihood of an efficient hearing and favorable resolution, while minimizing procedural objections that can delay the process.
Declarations from the trustee and witnesses are drafted to explain the sequence of events, the grantor’s planning intent, and any attempts to transfer title. Exhibits such as trust pages, deeds, account statements, and correspondence are organized to present a coherent factual narrative. Attention to evidentiary detail helps the court evaluate the strength of the claim and reduces the need for supplemental filings. Clear presentation facilitates judicial review and supports a reasoned decision recognizing trust ownership where warranted.
After the petition is assembled, we file it with the appropriate probate court and serve notice on beneficiaries and other interested parties as required by California law. Proper notice allows interested parties to review the petition and raise objections if necessary. We monitor court schedules for hearings and respond to any procedural requirements or objections. Ensuring accurate service and timely filings helps keep the process on track and preserves the validity of any court order obtained.
The court reviews the petition, supporting declarations, and exhibits, and may hold a hearing where interested parties can contest the findings. At the hearing the judge considers whether the evidence supports treating the asset as trust property. If the court finds that transfer formalities were incomplete but the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust, it issues an order recognizing trust ownership. That order then authorizes the trustee to manage, transfer, or distribute the asset according to the trust instrument.
At the hearing, factual declarations and exhibits are presented and the court may hear argument from the parties. The goal is to demonstrate that the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust is clear and supported by credible evidence. When the record persuasively ties the asset to the trust instrument and identifies attempts to transfer title, the court is more likely to rule in favor of treating the asset as trust property. A thorough, well-organized presentation improves the chance of a decisive order.
Once the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, the trustee can use that order to effectuate the transfer, sale, or distribution required by the trust instrument. The order provides legal authority recognized by banks, title companies, and other institutions. Trustees should follow any steps the court requires, such as recording the order with the county recorder or providing certified copies to financial institutions. Implementing the order completes the administrative process and aligns asset handling with the trust terms.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to recognize certain assets as belonging to a trust even though title remains in the decedent’s name. It is used when there is persuasive evidence that the decedent intended the asset to be held by the trust but formal steps to retitle the property were not completed before death. The petition presents the trust document, related records, and witness statements to show the grantor’s intent and seeks a court order declaring the asset part of the trust so the trustee can administer it under the trust terms. This remedy is beneficial when the issue is limited to specific assets and the evidence of intent is strong. Successful petitions avoid the need for probate administration for those particular items and provide trustees with legal authority to manage or distribute them. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence and issues an order if it finds the record supports the asset’s treatment as trust property, enabling practical resolution without extended estate litigation.
Determining whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate depends on the facts: the number and type of mis-titled assets, the existence of a clear trust instrument, and the availability of supporting documents and witness statements. If a single account or piece of real property was intended for the trust and there is corroborating evidence of the decedent’s intent, a petition may be the efficient path. If multiple assets, creditor claims, or contested beneficiary positions exist, a broader estate administration might be more appropriate to handle all matters comprehensively. An early document review helps identify the best approach. Collect trust documents, deeds, account statements, and any communications that show the decedent’s plan. This evidence informs whether the petition is likely to succeed and whether additional filings will be needed. Consulting counsel early can help determine the optimal strategy, balancing speed, cost, and the need to protect beneficiary and creditor rights under California law.
The court considers a range of evidence when evaluating a Heggstad petition, focusing on whether the decedent intended the asset to be in the trust. Key materials include the trust instrument, deeds, account paperwork, beneficiary designations, correspondence, and records of attempted transfers. Declarations from witnesses who observed the decedent’s estate planning actions or heard statements about intentions also carry weight. The court assesses the credibility and consistency of the evidence to decide whether title defects were mere technical omissions rather than reflective of a different intent. Documentation that aligns with the trust terms and demonstrates the grantor’s planning decisions is especially persuasive. The more contemporaneous and direct the evidence linking the asset to the trust, the stronger the petition. Well-prepared exhibits and clear testimonial declarations minimize ambiguity and help the judge reach a reasoned conclusion that the asset should be treated as trust property for administration and distribution.
A Heggstad petition can avoid probate for specific mis-titled assets by securing a court order that treats them as trust property, but it does not necessarily avoid probate for the entire estate. If other assets require probate because they are owned solely by the decedent or have conflicting designations, a full probate administration may still be required for those items. The petition is a targeted tool to address title defects for assets intended for the trust, while the remainder of the estate is resolved according to its own ownership status and applicable law. If a decedent’s estate includes numerous mis-titled assets or overlapping issues, a comprehensive approach may be needed to address all matters efficiently. In that context, counsel can evaluate whether multiple petitions, corrective transactions, or probate filings will best protect estate value and satisfy creditor and beneficiary rights, ensuring a coordinated resolution across all assets and claims.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition can vary based on the court’s schedule, the completeness of the petition and supporting evidence, and whether interested parties object. In straightforward cases with strong documentary support and no objections, courts can resolve petitions relatively quickly, sometimes within a few months. More complex matters or contested petitions that require hearings and additional evidence may take longer. Timing also depends on local probate court procedures and filing backlogs in Contra Costa County or other jurisdictions. Preparing a thorough petition and serving proper notice upfront helps speed the process. Promptly gathering documents, timely service to interested parties, and clear presentation of facts reduce the need for supplemental filings and contested hearings. Counsel can provide an estimated timeline after reviewing the specifics of the case and the available evidence, offering practical expectations for each stage from filing through court order implementation.
Yes. California law requires that interested parties receive notice of a Heggstad petition so they can review the filing and, if they wish, object or respond. Beneficiaries, heirs, and other parties with a legal interest in the asset must be given an opportunity to be heard. Proper notice procedures help ensure due process and strengthen the enforceability of any resulting court order by reducing the chance of later challenges based on lack of notice or procedural defects. Providing thorough and timely notice also encourages transparency and can reduce contention. When beneficiaries understand the petition’s basis and supporting evidence, many disputes can be resolved early or withdrawn. If objections arise, the court will evaluate them in light of the full record and evidence and decide whether the petition should be granted, denied, or modified to address legitimate concerns.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the petitioner may need to explore alternative routes to resolve ownership, such as initiating a probate administration for the asset, pursuing other corrective title procedures, or gathering additional evidence to support a renewed petition. A denial typically indicates the court found the evidence insufficient to conclude the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust. In that event, the asset may be handled according to its current title or through probate if necessary, consistent with California law. Before pursuing further action, parties should assess why the petition was denied and whether additional documentation or different legal mechanisms might change the outcome. In some situations, negotiation among interested parties or voluntary transfers, if permitted, can resolve the matter without further court proceedings. A careful review of the court’s reasoning helps identify the most practical next steps.
Generally, trustees should not sell or transfer mis-titled property without court approval or clear authority, because doing so may expose the trustee to claims by beneficiaries or third parties if the asset was not legally part of the trust. A Heggstad petition seeks the legal recognition needed for a trustee to act with confidence. If circumstances require urgent action, a trustee should seek court guidance or temporary relief that authorizes specific steps while the petition is pending, rather than proceeding unilaterally and risking liability or contested transactions. Banks, title companies, and other institutions typically require a court order or certified documentation to accept trustee authority for mis-titled assets. Following proper procedure protects the trustee and beneficiaries and ensures transactions are legally valid. When time-sensitive needs arise, expedited court procedures or interim orders can sometimes provide the necessary authority while the broader petition is resolved.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include opening a probate administration for assets that lack clear trust title, pursuing corrective deeds or account retitling when possible during life, or negotiating voluntary transfers among heirs and beneficiaries. In some cases, beneficiary designation updates or joint ownership arrangements that were intended by the decedent can be corrected through administrative processes if institutions accept supporting documentation. Each alternative has trade-offs in terms of timing, cost, and legal certainty compared to a petition backed by a court order. Choosing the right alternative depends on the asset type, the clarity of evidence, and whether parties agree on the desired outcome. When cooperative solutions are available, they can save time and expense. Where disagreements or legal ambiguities exist, a court order via petition provides the strongest protection for trustee actions and reduces the risk of later challenges to how the asset was handled.
To reduce the risk of Heggstad issues, plan proactively by ensuring assets are properly titled in the trust’s name or that beneficiary designations align with trust planning. Regularly review deeds, account registrations, and beneficiary forms to confirm they reflect current estate planning intentions. Keeping an up-to-date schedule of trust assets and providing clear instructions to financial institutions helps prevent assets from remaining mis-titled at the grantor’s passing. Clear documentation of transfers or attempted retitling also supports later legal actions if needed. Communicating with trustees and family members about where key documents are kept and how assets are titled makes administration smoother after death. Periodic reviews with an estate planning attorney can identify and correct lapses in account registration or deeds, reducing the likelihood of needing a Heggstad petition. Thoughtful maintenance of documents and titles protects the grantor’s intent and simplifies trust administration for trustees and beneficiaries.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas