A Heggstad petition can be an important tool for beneficiaries or trustees when property is mistakenly not transferred into a trust after the settlor’s death. In the San Ramon area, this process helps align title and trust documents so assets can be managed according to the trust creator’s intentions. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients with careful review of trust instruments, property records, and probate alternatives to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. Early assessment of title issues and clear documentation often leads to faster resolution and reduces the likelihood of contested proceedings among interested parties.
When a trust exists but an asset remains titled in the deceased’s individual name, a Heggstad petition offers a path to have the court recognize that asset as part of the trust. This approach is typically used when the transfer into a revocable living trust was intended but not completed before death. For families in Contra Costa County and San Ramon, pursuing a petition can prevent unnecessary probate and ensure that the trust terms control distribution and management of the asset. The process requires careful preparation of affidavits, supporting documents, and a clear statement of why the asset belongs to the trust.
Filing a Heggstad petition can preserve the settlor’s intent by placing omitted assets under the trust’s governance rather than leaving them subject to probate. This remedy supports continuity in asset management, protects successor trustees’ ability to act, and helps beneficiaries receive property in the manner originally intended. In many situations it also simplifies title issues and reduces the administrative burden that emerges when real property or accounts remain in the decedent’s name. For families who value privacy and efficiency, obtaining a court recognition that an asset belongs to the trust can prevent delays and disputes that otherwise complicate estate administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide estate planning and trust administration services from a practical, client-focused perspective. We assist clients across San Ramon and surrounding communities with trust-related issues, including Heggstad petitions, trust amendments, and trust funding matters. Our process emphasizes clear communication, thorough documentation review, and strategies tailored to preserve the client’s goals while minimizing delay. Clients receive guidance on gathering deeds, trust instruments, beneficiary designations, and other evidence needed for court filings, along with support during hearings and when coordinating title transfers after a favorable court determination.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that property should have been transferred to a trust even though title still reflects the decedent’s individual ownership. This legal action often arises after the settlor’s death when the trustee or beneficiary discovers that a deed, account, or document was not completed. The petition presents evidence such as the trust document, intent language, and declarations from those with firsthand knowledge. In California, courts may grant the petition if the evidence demonstrates the settlor intended the property to be held by the trust, allowing the trustee to take action to transfer title without a full probate estate proceeding.
Not every situation requires a Heggstad petition; sometimes a simple deed transfer or administrative procedure will suffice. Determining the right course depends on the type of asset, how title is recorded, and whether other parties have competing claims. The petition route is often chosen when the asset is significant, when clear documentary evidence supports the trust claim, or when avoiding formal probate is important to the family. Effective petitions include declarations and attachments that connect the asset to the trust, and they may be combined with related motions to correct records and allow the trustee to manage or sell the property if necessary.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that requests recognition that property was intended to be part of a trust even though title does not reflect that transfer. The petition is named after a controlling California case and is used when the settlor’s documentation and circumstances support a finding that the trust was meant to control the asset. When granted, the court’s order allows the trustee to assert trust ownership, transfer title, or otherwise administer the asset according to the trust terms. The ruling is particularly useful in avoiding full probate for assets that were meant to be held in trust.
A strong Heggstad petition typically includes several critical elements: the trust instrument itself, any deeds or transfer documents, declarations from the trustee or persons with knowledge of the settlor’s intent, and records showing how the asset was handled. The process begins with an investigation into title and trust documents, followed by drafting the petition and supporting declarations. The court will review the submitted evidence and may schedule a hearing. If the court finds clear and convincing evidence that the asset should be treated as trust property, it will issue an order enabling the trustee to effectuate transfers or other administration actions.
Understanding the terminology used in trust funding and Heggstad petitions helps clients follow the process more confidently. Terms like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, title, deed, and probate are commonly used when describing the transfer of property into a trust and the legal remedies when transfers are incomplete. This section explains those concepts and related processes so that individuals can gather the correct records and know what to expect during a petition proceeding. Clear definitions make it easier to prepare the petition and present convincing evidence to the court.
The settlor, sometimes referred to as the trust creator, is the person who establishes the trust and transfers or intends to transfer assets into it during life or at death. For purposes of a Heggstad petition, documentation of the settlor’s intent is key; this can include trust provisions, correspondence, or other contemporaneous records. Evidence that the settlor intended particular assets to be trust property strengthens the petition. This term is central because a court’s determination often turns on whether the settlor’s actions and declarations demonstrate a clear intention for the asset to be held in trust.
A trustee is the individual or entity appointed by the trust document to manage trust assets and carry out the terms of the trust for the benefit of the named beneficiaries. In Heggstad proceedings, the trustee commonly files the petition or supports it through sworn statements showing the trust instruments and intent. A court order recognizing an asset as trust property restores the trustee’s authority to administer, manage, or transfer that asset under the trust’s directions. Trustees must act in accordance with fiduciary duties and follow the trust terms when proceeding after a favorable court ruling.
Title refers to legal ownership of an asset as reflected by public records such as deeds for real property or account registrations for financial assets. When title remains in the decedent’s name despite a trust that indicates an intent to transfer, a Heggstad petition can address that discrepancy. Supporting documents may include recorded deeds, beneficiary designations, account statements, and any signed but unrecorded transfer instruments. Demonstrating the link between the asset and the trust through reliable records and sworn statements is essential to persuade the court to recognize trust ownership.
Probate alternatives are procedures that allow property to pass outside of the formal probate process, including properly funded trusts and certain summary proceedings. A Heggstad petition serves as a remedial option when assets intended for a trust remain improperly titled and would otherwise face probate. By establishing that the trust owns the asset, the petition can preserve the privacy and efficiency benefits associated with trust administration. Proper trust funding involves timely transfer of deeds and accounts during the settlor’s lifetime to minimize the need for post-death court interventions.
When an asset was meant to be in a trust but remains titled in the decedent’s name, several legal paths may be available. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize trust ownership based on intent and supporting evidence. Alternatives can include initiating probate, using small estate procedures if eligible, or working with title companies and recordholders to complete administrative transfers. Choosing the right approach depends on the value of the asset, the clarity of documentation, and whether other parties might contest ownership. Advising clients on options helps weigh cost, time, and privacy considerations.
A limited administrative approach may be appropriate when the asset involved is relatively modest in value or when the titleholder or institution will accept routine documentation to retitle the asset without court action. For instance, some banks or brokerage firms allow trustees to submit the trust and a death certificate to change account registration. Real property may sometimes be retitled through a simple corrective deed when all interested parties agree. When records are clear and there are no competing claims, these administrative routes can save time and cost compared to formal court petitions.
When beneficiaries and successor trustees are in agreement and title holders cooperate, informal resolution can be effective. If the entity holding title is willing to accept a deed or other paperwork and there is no likelihood of a dispute, pursuing an administrative retitling may avoid the expense of filing a petition. Clear communication among interested parties and careful documentation of the settlor’s intent are still necessary. This approach is viable when the facts surrounding the intended transfer are straightforward and unlikely to prompt litigation or competing claims.
A Heggstad petition becomes particularly important when the asset at issue is significant in value or when ownership is disputed among beneficiaries or heirs. In those situations, relying on an administrative retitling may be impossible or risky because third parties may refuse to change title without a court order. Seeking judicial recognition through a petition provides a clear and enforceable determination that the asset belongs to the trust, enabling trustees to act confidently in managing or distributing the property according to trust terms.
When trust documentation or transfer records are incomplete, unclear, or absent, a court proceeding can weigh evidence and declarations to resolve whether the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. A Heggstad petition allows submission of affidavits, drafts of deeds, and other supporting materials that may not suffice for an administrative change alone. The court’s review offers a formal avenue to clarify intent and produce an order that reconciles the discrepancy between title records and trust instruments, providing certainty to trustees and beneficiaries.
A comprehensive approach that includes a properly prepared petition and supporting declarations reduces the risk of future disputes and ensures the trustee has clear authority to manage or transfer the asset. The court’s order is enforceable and is recognized by title companies and financial institutions, which can simplify subsequent transactions like sales or retitling. For families seeking to minimize delays and legal uncertainty, a formal filing produces definitive court recognition that aligns legal title with the trust instruments.
Beyond immediate title correction, a successful petition can protect beneficiaries by preventing later claims that might arise if ownership remained ambiguous. The order provides a clean record for future dealings and can reduce administrative obstacles for successor trustees. In addition, handling the matter through the courts when necessary may preserve important tax or creditor considerations by clarifying the trust’s relationship to the asset, enabling trustees to proceed with distribution or management under the trust terms.
Obtaining a court order through a Heggstad petition offers certainty that title will be treated as trust property, which helps trustees carry out their duties without fear of later challenge. This formal recognition is persuasive to title companies, banks, and other entities that may require judicial documentation before changing records. The increased certainty benefits beneficiaries by ensuring property is administered in accordance with the trust instrument rather than being subject to intestacy rules or probate distribution, which could produce outcomes different from the settlor’s intentions.
While court proceedings involve preparation and filing, securing a Heggstad ruling can ultimately streamline administration by clearing title issues and enabling trustees to manage or sell assets without recurring obstacles. A clear record reduces the likelihood of follow-on disputes that would otherwise prolong administration. For trustees who need to meet fiduciary duties and provide timely distributions, this streamlined route often results in a more efficient estate settlement and fewer interruptions when interacting with third parties handling assets.
Start by collecting the trust document, any related deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and correspondence that show the settlor’s intent. Early gathering of these records makes it easier to craft a persuasive petition and minimizes the need for subpoenas or additional discovery. Deeds, both recorded and unrecorded drafts, and evidence of the settlor’s statements or instructions are particularly valuable. Organizing this evidence before filing reduces delays and helps present a coherent narrative that supports the trustee’s claim that the asset belongs to the trust.
Anticipate the documentation a title company or county recorder may require after a court order, including certified copies of trust instruments, the probate court order granting the petition, and any required affidavits. Preparing these items in advance helps ensure that once the court issues an order, the trustee can promptly record deeds or update account registrations. Familiarity with local recording practices and title company expectations expedites post-order transactions and reduces the risk of additional requests that could slow the transfer or sale of property held in the trust.
Consider a Heggstad petition when an important asset that should have been included in a trust remains titled in the decedent’s name, when probate would be costly or time-consuming, or when title discrepancies create obstacles to administration. This remedy is appropriate if the trust document and surrounding facts show the settlor’s intention to place the asset in trust but the transfer was never completed. Pursuing a petition can protect the settlor’s wishes, provide legal clarity for trustees and beneficiaries, and prevent the need for a full probate estate for that particular asset.
You should also consider this process if a third party refuses to recognize the trust claim without a court order, if the asset must be sold or refinanced quickly, or if there is a risk of competing claims from heirs or creditors. A court determination often resolves title concerns that would otherwise delay transactions and lead to greater expense. For families focused on honoring the settlor’s plan while avoiding prolonged administration, a Heggstad petition can be an appropriate tool where the facts support trust ownership.
Filing often follows the discovery that a deed was never recorded, that an asset remains in the decedent’s name, or that an institution will not retitle an account without a court order. Other circumstances include ambiguous trust language, incomplete transfers recorded only as drafts, or a need to clarify ownership to enable sale or refinance. In many cases, family members or successor trustees find that relying on trust documents alone is insufficient for third-party requirements, making a petition necessary to align legal title and trust documentation.
When a deed intended to transfer real property into a trust was never recorded or contains defects, the property will still appear in the decedent’s name at the county recorder. This discrepancy can prevent the trustee from selling, refinancing, or otherwise managing the property. A Heggstad petition presents evidence such as the trust instrument, the unrecorded deed draft, and declarations showing intent, which may convince a court to declare the property trust-held, enabling the trustee to proceed with necessary transactions without formal probate.
Banks, brokerages, and other institutions sometimes decline to retitle accounts based solely on trust documents and a death certificate, especially when account registrations were not properly updated during the settlor’s lifetime. When institutions require judicial confirmation of trust ownership, filing a petition can produce an order that satisfies their policies. Having a court order helps trustees gain access to funds, transfer account ownership, and administer assets consistent with the trust terms without protracted negotiation with the recordholder.
If heirs or creditors threaten to dispute ownership or claim that the asset should pass through probate, a Heggstad petition can provide an authoritative resolution. Presenting clear documentary evidence and declarations to the court allows a judge to decide whether the asset belongs to the trust. Securing an order reduces the likelihood of future litigation by establishing a judicial determination, which is often persuasive in quieting title and preventing repeated challenges to the trustee’s authority over the asset.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve clients in San Ramon and nearby communities with trust funding and post-death title issues, including Heggstad petitions and related filings. We assist trustees and beneficiaries in collecting evidence, preparing sworn declarations, and navigating court procedures when necessary. Our goal is to provide practical guidance that helps families resolve title discrepancies efficiently while protecting the settlor’s expressed wishes. Local knowledge of Contra Costa County recording practices and court procedures supports smoother handling of these matters.
Clients choose our firm for responsive communication, careful preparation of court filings, and a measured approach to resolving title and trust issues. We work closely with trustees to assemble documentary evidence, draft declarations, and coordinate with title companies and local recorders once a court order is obtained. Practical litigation readiness, combined with attention to efficient case management, helps clients pursue the most appropriate path—whether that is an administrative retitling or a formal petition to ensure property is treated as trust assets.
Our approach emphasizes clarity and predictability: we explain the likely timelines, the evidence needed, and the potential outcomes so clients can make informed decisions. When court proceedings are required, we prepare persuasive, well-documented petitions and support the trustee through hearings and post-order recording steps. We also advise on related trust administration matters that may arise, such as deeds, pour-over wills, HIPAA authorizations, and guardianship nominations, ensuring a coordinated plan for estate settlement and asset management.
We prioritize minimizing delays and cost while protecting the settlor’s intentions. That begins with assessing whether a petition is necessary, exploring administrative alternatives, and preparing the strongest possible petition when court action is the right choice. Clients receive straightforward guidance on assembling records like trust instruments, deeds, and financial statements. Once a favorable order is obtained, we help follow through with recording and title updates so trustees can manage and distribute assets as the trust directs.
Our process begins with a focused review of the trust documents, deeds, and account records to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We then gather declarations and supporting evidence, prepare the petition, and file it with the probate court. We keep clients informed throughout the proceeding, assist with any required notices to interested parties, and represent the trustee at hearings. After a favorable ruling, we coordinate with title companies and recorders to complete the necessary transfers or recordings, closing the loop on the title correction.
The first step is a thorough assessment of the trust instrument, deeds, account registrations, and any drafts or correspondence that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. We request documents from clients and relevant institutions and evaluate whether an administrative retitling is feasible or whether a petition is the better route. This stage includes identifying interested parties who must be notified and determining the evidentiary support needed to demonstrate that the asset was intended to be held in trust.
We help clients collect all relevant material, including the trust document, deeds, deeds drafts, account statements, and any communications showing the settlor’s intent. Proper documentation often includes recorded deeds, transfer-on-death designations, or signed drafts that were not recorded. Assembling these records early streamlines petition preparation and reduces the need for additional discovery. Clear organization of evidence supports a persuasive narrative connecting the asset to the trust and helps the court understand the background and facts.
We identify beneficiaries, heirs, creditors, and other potentially interested parties who must be notified under the rules governing Heggstad petitions. Anticipating potential objections or documentation gaps allows us to address issues proactively, whether through additional affidavits, mediation with disputing parties, or supplemental records. Careful early identification of these parties also informs the scope of notice required and shapes the strategy for presenting evidence to the court while minimizing surprises during the proceeding.
During this phase we draft the petition and supporting declarations, assemble exhibits, and prepare proof of service documents for required notices. The petition presents the factual and legal basis for treating the asset as trust property and attaches the trust instrument, deeds, and declarations that corroborate the settlor’s intent. We file the petition with the appropriate probate court, handle required filings, and monitor deadlines for responses or objections. Properly prepared petitions anticipate questions a judge may raise and present a clear, organized record.
We prepare declarations from the trustee and other witnesses who can attest to the circumstances of the intended transfer, along with documentary exhibits such as the trust, deeds, and account statements. These declarations explain the settlor’s actions and intentions and connect the evidence to the legal standard the court will apply. Well-crafted declarations anticipate likely factual queries and provide concise, credible explanations that support the requested judicial relief to treat the asset as trust property.
After finalizing the petition and exhibits, we file them with the probate court and arrange for required service to interested parties. Proper service and notice prevent procedural defects that might delay the case or invite challenges. We track filings, oppositions, and any requests for continuances, and we keep clients informed about next steps and timing for potential hearings. Effective case management at this stage helps the petition proceed efficiently through the court system.
If the court sets a hearing, we present the case through written submissions and in-court argument as needed, responding to any objections. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property. Following a favorable order, we assist with recording deeds, updating titles, and coordinating with banks or title companies to implement the court’s decision. Final steps often include providing copies of the order and certified documents to recorders or financial institutions to complete transfers.
We attend hearings and present the trustee’s case based on the written petition and declarations, answering questions from the court and addressing any objections from interested parties. Our courtroom preparation focuses on a clear, concise presentation of the settlor’s intent and the documentary proof that links the asset to the trust. Effective advocacy at this stage seeks to secure the court order necessary to permit the trustee to manage or transfer the asset according to the trust terms without further procedural complications.
Following a court order recognizing trust ownership, we coordinate the steps required to record corrective deeds, update account registrations, or satisfy title company requirements for sale or refinance. This includes providing certified copies of the order, trust documents when necessary, and any affidavits required by the county recorder or financial institution. Completing these post-order actions finalizes the correction and ensures the trustee can exercise the authority granted by the court to administer, transfer, or dispose of the asset in accordance with the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a court request asking a judge to declare that property should be treated as part of a trust despite title showing otherwise. It is used when the settlor intended to transfer the asset into the trust but, for reasons such as an unrecorded deed or administrative oversight, title still lists the decedent individually. The petition presents the trust document, any drafts or deeds, and sworn statements to demonstrate the settlor’s intent. When the court grants the petition, it issues an order that allows the trustee to treat and handle the asset as trust property. This remedy is commonly pursued to avoid opening a probate estate for a particular asset and to ensure that the trustee can manage or dispose of the asset according to the trust terms. It is appropriate when documentary evidence and declarations make a persuasive case that the settlor intended the transfer, and when administrative avenues are insufficient or when third parties require judicial confirmation before changing title.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies based on factors such as court schedules, the completeness of documentation, and whether interested parties object. In many cases the initial preparation and document collection can take several weeks to a few months, depending on the availability of records and witnesses. After filing, court hearings and procedural timelines can extend the process; uncontested matters move more quickly, while contested proceedings take longer. Local court caseloads in Contra Costa County also influence scheduling and overall timing. Planning for the process includes allowing time for notices to be served to interested parties and for possible responses. Prompt collection of trust instruments, deeds, and supportive declarations reduces delays. Where urgent transactions are needed, such as pending sales or refinances, early assessment and clear communication with the court and title companies can help prioritize the matter and potentially accelerate the resolution.
Strong supporting evidence includes the trust document showing the settlor’s intention, any deed drafts or recorded deeds demonstrating the intended transfer, and declarations from the trustee or individuals who had direct knowledge of the settlor’s instructions. Account statements, beneficiary designations, or written communications that reference the trust and the asset can also be valuable. The combination of documentary proof and sworn testimony helps the court assess whether the asset was intended to be part of the trust. Additional useful materials may include copies of correspondence with financial institutions, notes from meetings where the settlor discussed their plan, and recorded instruments that reflect attempts to transfer title. The more consistent and contemporaneous the evidence is with the settlor’s stated intent, the more persuasive the petition will be. Preparing clear, organized exhibits that connect the facts supports a favorable court determination.
A trustee can file a Heggstad petition without unanimous beneficiary consent, though notice to interested parties is generally required and beneficiaries have the opportunity to respond. Filing the petition does not bypass the rights of beneficiaries to object, but a well-supported petition can address likely concerns through documentation and declarations. Trustees have a duty to act in the beneficiaries’ interest and must follow the trust’s terms while pursuing court recognition of trust ownership when necessary to fulfill their responsibilities. When beneficiaries raise objections, the court will consider those arguments and the evidence supporting the trustee’s petition. Early communication with beneficiaries can sometimes resolve disputes and lead to agreements that avoid contested hearings. If an objection persists, the court will weigh the competing claims and the strength of the documentary record in making its determination.
A Heggstad petition can prevent probate for the specific asset at issue by securing a court order that recognizes the asset as trust property, which removes the need to include that asset in probate distribution. However, the petition affects only the asset addressed and does not automatically prevent probate for other assets that are not trust property or for matters that require a probate estate. The broader estate administration needs depend on the totality of the decedent’s assets and how they were titled or designated. If the asset covered by the petition is the primary reason probate would otherwise be necessary, the petition can substantially reduce or eliminate the need for probate. It is important to evaluate all assets and beneficiary designations to determine whether additional measures are needed to avoid probate for other property and to ensure the overall estate plan functions as intended.
If a third party objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection alongside the petition evidence and may schedule a hearing to resolve disputed issues. Objectors typically need to present factual or legal grounds for their position, such as challenging the authenticity of documents or contesting the settlor’s intent. The judge will weigh the credibility of testimony, the consistency of documentary evidence, and relevant legal standards to decide whether to grant the petition. Objections can extend the timeline and increase the complexity of the case, but they do not automatically prevent a favorable outcome if the documentary record and declarations convincingly show the asset belonged to the trust. Resolving objections may involve additional discovery, supplemental filings, or negotiated settlements if parties prefer to avoid protracted litigation.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include pursuing administrative retitling with the institution or county recorder when they accept trust documents and a death certificate, using small estate procedures if eligibility requirements are met, or obtaining a corrective deed executed by successors if all interested parties agree. These alternatives can be faster and less expensive when the facts are straightforward and there is no dispute about ownership. Exploring these options first may be appropriate when institutions have established procedures for retitling trust assets. When administrative routes are blocked, when institutions require judicial confirmation, or when disputes exist, a petition becomes the practical solution. Assessing the viability of alternatives requires evaluating the asset type, the willingness of recordholders to cooperate, and potential risks of relying on non-judicial transfers in the face of possible creditor or heir claims.
Costs for preparing and filing a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the facts, the amount of documentary preparation needed, court filing fees, and whether the petition is contested. Typical expenses include attorney fees for document review and petition drafting, charges for certified copies, and recording or title company fees after an order is obtained. If the petition proceeds uncontested, costs are generally lower. When objections arise or additional litigation is needed, expenses increase in proportion to the time spent responding to disputes and appearing in court. We provide an initial assessment to help estimate potential costs and discuss options to control expenses, including exploring administrative alternatives that may be less costly. Understanding the likely range of fees early in the process helps clients decide the best path forward for resolving title issues and aligning asset ownership with the trust.
A Heggstad petition can be used for bank or brokerage accounts when those accounts were intended to be held in a trust but remain registered in the decedent’s name. Financial institutions sometimes require a court order recognizing trust ownership before changing account registration. In such cases, the petition should include documentation and declarations that show the settlor’s intent and any prior communications with the institution. Once the court issues an order, the trustee can present certified copies to the institution to effect retitling or transfer. For accounts that permit transfer on death or payable-on-death designations, administrative options may exist if the transfer mechanism is valid and the institution cooperates. When account registration remains in the decedent’s name and the institution insists on judicial confirmation, the petition serves as the necessary legal instrument to satisfy the institution’s requirements and allow the trustee to manage the funds consistent with the trust.
If you discover property that appears to belong to a trust but is titled in the decedent’s name, the first step is to gather the trust document, any deeds or drafts, account statements, and any written or recorded evidence of the settlor’s intent. Next, consult with counsel or a qualified advisor to evaluate whether an administrative retitling is feasible or whether filing a petition is required. Early action preserves evidence and allows timely notification of interested parties if court action is necessary. Avoid attempting to retitle property without proper legal direction, because improper transfers can create disputes or expose trustees to liability. Instead, pursue a careful document review and an assessment of the most appropriate route—administrative change, small estate options, or a Heggstad petition—so the asset is handled in a way that aligns with the settlor’s intentions and applicable legal requirements.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas