A Heggstad petition can be an important legal step when property intended for a trust has not been formally transferred during a settlor’s life. In Saranap and surrounding areas of Contra Costa County, families encounter this issue when deeds, titles, or other assets remain in an individual’s name after the trustor’s death. Our law office helps clients understand the petition process, what evidence is required to show intent to transfer assets into a trust, and the practical outcomes of filing. We focus on clear communication about timelines, likely costs, and how the petition can support orderly distribution under an existing trust.
Many clients first learn about Heggstad petitions when settling an estate and discovering assets are still titled in the decedent’s name. The petition asks a probate court to confirm that these assets were intended to be trust property so they can be distributed according to the trust without a separate probate administration for those items. This helps reduce confusion, delays, and expense for beneficiaries. We explain steps to gather supporting documents, how testimony or declarations are used, and what the court typically considers when deciding whether to grant a Heggstad petition for property reformation or transfer into a revocable living trust.
Filing a Heggstad petition can simplify administration by formally recognizing trust ownership of assets that were intended to be placed in a trust but were not properly retitled. This approach can reduce the burden on beneficiaries by avoiding separate probate for specific items, allow trustees to manage and distribute trust property according to trust terms, and provide a judicial affirmation that protects against later challenges. For families in Saranap, securing a court order that clarifies ownership reduces uncertainty over bank accounts, real estate, and other titled assets, helping complete estate administration with greater certainty and efficiency.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout Contra Costa County and Silicon Valley, offering practical counsel for trust administration and related court proceedings. Our team guides trustees and family members through the specific steps needed to support a Heggstad petition, including document collection, drafting declarations, and filing the necessary pleadings. We prioritize client understanding of court procedures, explain likely timelines, and work to prepare persuasive evidence that shows the decedent’s intent. Clients appreciate the responsive approach, local court familiarity, and attention to detail when resolving incomplete trust funding matters.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to treat property that remained in a decedent’s name as trust property when the evidence shows the decedent intended the asset to be held in the trust. The petition typically targets specific assets like real estate, vehicle titles, or accounts that were overlooked when the trust was created or funded. The court reviews documents, testimony, and surrounding circumstances to determine whether reform, reformation, or an order recognizing trust ownership is appropriate. Understanding this legal mechanism helps trustees and beneficiaries evaluate whether seeking judicial confirmation is the best route to align asset titles with the trust’s terms.
Successful Heggstad petitions rest on demonstrating the settlor’s intent and showing a clear connection between the asset and the trust. Evidence may include draft deeds, trust documents, correspondence, statements of the settlor, or actions taken to treat the property as trust property. The petition can address both clerical errors and situations where formal transfer was overlooked, and it can be used to avoid a broader probate on those assets. We work with clients to gather persuasive materials, prepare supporting declarations, and present a clear legal argument that aligns with California probate procedures and local court expectations.
A Heggstad petition is a request to a probate court to declare that certain assets, though titled in the decedent’s name, should be treated as trust property because the decedent intended them to be included in the trust. The petition often arises when a settlor created a revocable living trust but failed to retitle real estate or other assets before death. The court examines evidence of intent and may grant an order reforming the title or otherwise recognizing trust ownership. This mechanism helps align the estate administration with the decedent’s documented estate plan without needing full probate for those items.
Courts reviewing a Heggstad petition evaluate the trust document, any attempted transfers, deeds, declarations, and other proof of the settlor’s intent to place the asset into the trust. They also consider whether equitable relief is warranted to correct an oversight or reflect the decedent’s true intentions. The process requires careful drafting of the petition, supporting declarations from witnesses or the trustee, and often a review of title records. Our role is to assemble coherent evidence, anticipate potential objections, and present a petition that clearly ties the asset to the trust’s terms and the settlor’s documented intent.
Understanding common terms helps when navigating a Heggstad petition. Key words include trust funding, settlor intent, reformation, trustee, probate court, and title transfer. Knowing these terms clarifies what documentation is important and what the court will consider. This glossary offers plain-language definitions to help trustees and family members follow the process from petition preparation through potential court hearing and entry of an order. Clear definitions reduce surprises and support better preparation for a petition that seeks judicial recognition of trust ownership over specific assets.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring assets into a trust so they become trust property and are managed or distributed under the trust’s terms. Funding typically includes retitling real estate, changing account ownership, and assigning assets to the trustee’s control. When assets intended for a trust remain in an individual’s name, a trustee may seek a Heggstad petition to have the court recognize those assets as trust property. Proper funding reduces the need for probate and ensures the trust functions as intended by the settlor after death or incapacity.
Reformation in this context refers to a court-ordered change to deed records or other titles to reflect the settlor’s actual intent regarding property ownership. When a Heggstad petition is granted, the court may order that the asset be treated as trust property and direct the recorder or appropriate agency to reflect that recognition. Reformation corrects technical errors or omissions that prevented a transfer during the settlor’s lifetime, allowing the trust to operate as intended and enabling trustees to manage or distribute the assets without separate probate proceedings.
Settlor intent describes what the person who created the trust intended to happen to certain assets, including whether they should be held in the trust. Demonstrating intent is often central to a Heggstad petition and relies on documents, testimony, correspondence, and consistent actions that show the settlor treated the asset as part of the trust. Courts weigh the totality of evidence to determine whether the settlor intended the property to belong to the trust despite the absence of formal title transfer before death.
A trustee is the person authorized by the trust document to manage trust property and carry out distributions according to the trust terms. Trustee powers include collecting assets, managing investments, paying debts, and distributing property to beneficiaries. When assets are not properly titled in the trust, the trustee may petition the court for relief such as a Heggstad petition to have those assets recognized as trust property. Successful petitions empower the trustee to administer the asset in line with the trust without initiating full probate for that specific property.
When assets remain outside a trust, trustees and families can pursue several options depending on the situation, including filing a Heggstad petition, opening a limited probate proceeding, or negotiating with title holders and beneficiaries to transfer property voluntarily. A Heggstad petition is often preferable where clear evidence shows trust intent and judicial recognition will permit trust administration without broader probate. Limited probate may be necessary when intent is unclear or when there are competing claims. We review each option’s timeline, anticipated costs, and likely court outcomes to help clients choose the most effective path.
A limited probate approach can be adequate when the property values involved are modest and all beneficiaries agree on distribution, or when the title transfer is straightforward and uncontested. In such cases, avoiding a formal Heggstad petition may save time and expense. Trustees may instead use statutory procedures for transfer of small estates or rely on willing cooperation from title companies to retitle assets. We help clients evaluate whether a streamlined process will achieve the desired outcome without involving probate court, while ensuring legal documentation properly supports the transfer.
If the asset can be retitled through routine administrative procedures, such as beneficiary designation changes, affidavit transfers, or direct cooperation from financial institutions, a court petition may not be necessary. This path is appropriate when the institution accepts documentation showing the settlor intended the trust to receive the asset, or when the trustee can present clear written authorization. We assist clients in assembling the right paperwork, communicating with banks, title companies, and recorders to secure retitling without litigation when the facts permit a nonjudicial solution.
A comprehensive legal review is advisable when assets are substantial, titles are complex, or beneficiaries may contest ownership. In those circumstances, carefully prepared pleadings and supporting declarations improve the chance of a successful Heggstad petition and reduce the risk of future litigation. Our approach includes forensic review of documents, consultations with trustees and family members, and preparation of evidence that explains the settlor’s intent. Thorough preparation also clarifies likely court responses and helps manage expectations related to timeframes and possible outcomes.
Assets held across county lines, in multiple states, or with tangled title histories require a deeper legal review to determine the proper venue and the most efficient path for recognition. A Heggstad petition may need coordination with recorders, title companies, and practitioners in other jurisdictions, and careful legal analysis to ensure the court’s order will be effective for each asset. We organize the necessary records, coordinate filings, and advise trustees on how an order will operate across different agencies and recording offices.
Taking a comprehensive approach helps prevent future disputes, clarifies ownership for beneficiaries, and ensures trustees have the authority needed to manage and distribute assets according to the trust terms. By gathering complete documentation, preparing clear legal arguments, and anticipating possible objections, trustees increase the likelihood of an efficient court resolution. This strategy can also preserve estate value by reducing unnecessary fees or delays associated with repeated filings or contested proceedings, and it helps beneficiaries receive their distributions with greater predictability.
A well-prepared petition and supporting record provide a stronger basis for the court to issue an order recognizing trust ownership, which in turn gives title companies and financial institutions the confidence to transfer or reissue assets under trust control. That practical effect often results in quicker access to funds for paying debts and distributions to beneficiaries. Additionally, documenting the settlor’s intent and actions protects trustees from later challenges and helps ensure the trust is administered in a manner consistent with the settlor’s wishes.
A thorough petition process clarifies legal ownership and reduces ambiguity for everyone involved. When the court issues an order recognizing assets as trust property, trustees gain clear authority to manage and distribute those assets according to trust terms. Beneficiaries benefit from defined expectations about timing and amounts of distributions, and creditors can be addressed in an orderly fashion. This clarity minimizes the potential for disputes and makes post-appointment administration more efficient, which is especially helpful when multiple family members or institutions are involved.
When a Heggstad petition is supported by careful documentation and persuasive declarations, the court is more likely to grant relief that aligns title with the trust. That judicial recognition reduces opportunities for later challenges and helps prevent protracted disputes that can deplete estate assets and delay distributions. Comprehensive preparation also helps avoid repeated filings or remedial steps, allowing trustees to focus on administration rather than ongoing litigation, which preserves estate resources and supports a smoother transition for beneficiaries.
Begin by collecting any written records that show the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust, including drafts of deeds, copies of the trust instrument, letters, emails, or notes. Declarations from individuals who observed the settlor treating the asset as trust property can be helpful, as can records of payments, insurance changes, or mortgage documentation indicating trust involvement. Clear documentary support reduces uncertainty, shortens court review, and improves the likelihood that the petition will result in recognition of trust ownership without protracted disputes or requests for further evidence.
The Heggstad petition often relies on declarations from the trustee, witnesses, or professionals who can attest to the settlor’s actions and statements regarding the trust. Declarations should describe the circumstances with specificity, point to supporting documents, and explain why the asset was not retitled before death. Honest, consistent, and chronological declarations help the judge assess intent and reduce the chance of evidentiary disputes. Taking time to prepare thorough, organized statements strengthens the petition and helps achieve an efficient resolution.
Families often face the need for a Heggstad petition when a trust was created but some assets were never properly transferred. This can occur because documents were overlooked, transfers were attempted but not finalized, or the settlor believed assets were already included. Seeking judicial recognition of trust ownership prevents those assets from undergoing separate probate and aligns distribution with the trust’s terms. Trustees should consider a petition when title discrepancies impede administration or when clarity about ownership will facilitate timely payment of debts and distributions to beneficiaries.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad petition is when financial institutions, title companies, or third parties require a court order before transferring or reissuing assets in the name of the trustee. An order provides legal authority for trustees to act and reduces the risk that a later claim will disrupt administration. Especially for real estate or other significant assets, judicial confirmation can be the most effective way to ensure trust administration proceeds smoothly and that beneficiaries receive the outcomes the settlor intended.
Typical circumstances include overlooked deeds for real property, bank accounts left in the decedent’s name, vehicles not retitled to the trust, or transfers that were intended but not formally recorded. In some cases, the settlor used informal language or made oral statements about placing assets into a trust, leading to questions at death. Other situations involve changes in property ownership or marital status that were not reflected in trust schedules. These issues commonly prompt trustees to seek court recognition to align titles with the trust and enable administration.
Real estate is frequently the subject of a Heggstad petition because property is often titled individually and requires a deed to place it into a trust. When deeds were never recorded, the trustee may seek an order recognizing the property as trust assets. The petition will describe why the settlor intended the property to be in the trust and provide supporting evidence such as trust schedules, declarations, or prior transactions that show intent. An effective petition helps transfer the asset for trust administration without separate probate for that property.
Accounts that were meant to be included in a trust but remain in the decedent’s name can block trustees from accessing funds needed to pay bills or make distributions. A Heggstad petition can show the court why those accounts should be treated as trust property, often relying on statements of intent, correspondence, or documentation of the settlor’s financial arrangements. Obtaining a court order or showing a court ruling can enable financial institutions to reissue accounts in the trustee’s name and allow effective trust administration.
When title histories include transfers, divorce-related changes, or incomplete chain-of-title entries, the trustee may need a court order to clarify ownership and permit proper administration. Complex title issues can arise from prior conveyances, liens that were not cleared, or earlier attempts to transfer ownership that left ambiguous records. A Heggstad petition accompanied by careful documentation and declarations can persuade the court to recognize the asset as trust property, enabling the trustee to address encumbrances and proceed with distribution as the trust dictates.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Saranap, Contra Costa County, and nearby communities, guiding trustees and families through Heggstad petitions and trust funding matters. We provide practical assistance in gathering evidence, drafting petitions, and communicating with probate court staff and other parties. Our goal is to produce clear, court-ready documentation that helps secure recognition of trust ownership where appropriate. Whether the issue involves real property, accounts, or other titled assets, we aim to move administration forward efficiently while keeping clients informed at every step.
Clients choose our firm for a careful, methodical approach that focuses on detail and client communication. We begin by assessing the documentation that connects an asset to the trust and then outline practical steps to file a petition or pursue alternative remedies. Our team is familiar with local probate court procedures and works to present evidence in a way that aligns with judicial expectations. This attentive process reduces the chance of surprises and helps trustees proceed with confidence when administering trust property.
We emphasize transparent fee structures, realistic timelines, and collaborative preparation of declarations and supporting materials. Trustees and family members receive clear guidance about what documentation will strengthen a petition and how to respond to common questions from title companies or financial institutions. Our firm navigates communications with county recorders and other agencies to ensure that any court orders are properly implemented and that assets are placed under trust control in an orderly fashion.
Our practice also focuses on conflict prevention by anticipating potential objections, preparing answers to likely challenges, and documenting the settlor’s intent in a credible and organized manner. We aim to minimize court delays and unnecessary expense while securing the legal recognition trustees need to manage assets according to the trust. Throughout the process, clients receive practical, compassionate support to resolve ownership questions and complete trust administration efficiently.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust documents and the asset’s title history, followed by a plan for gathering declarations and supporting evidence. We prepare and file the Heggstad petition when appropriate, serve required parties, and respond to any inquiries from the court or opposing parties. If mediation or negotiation can resolve the matter without full hearing time, we pursue that path. Otherwise, we present the petition at hearing and assist with any recording or administrative follow-up needed to place the asset under the trust’s control after the court’s order.
The first step is a thorough review of the trust instrument, any attempted transfers, and public records for the asset. We identify documents that show the settlor’s intent and any obstacles in the chain of title. We then advise on additional records or witness statements that will strengthen the petition and coordinate collection of those materials. This groundwork establishes the narrative the petition will present and helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate or whether other remedies may be more efficient.
We examine the trust instrument, schedules, deeds, and any transfer attempts to identify gaps between the trust terms and asset titles. This review focuses on dates, signature blocks, and any language indicating the settlor’s intended disposition of the asset. Identifying discrepancies early allows us to plan focused evidence collection and avoid surprises during court review. Where drafts or earlier versions exist, we assess their relevance to the settlor’s intent and how those documents can support a petition.
We prepare declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals who can describe the settlor’s actions and statements about the asset. Supporting records such as payment ledgers, insurance changes, correspondence, or prior deeds are collected to corroborate those statements. Clear, chronological documentation helps the court understand why the asset should be treated as trust property. By assembling detailed evidence ahead of filing, we increase the petition’s clarity and reduce the likelihood of follow-up discovery requests or evidentiary disputes.
Once the evidence is prepared, we draft the Heggstad petition and related exhibits, file the paperwork with the probate court, and ensure all required parties are served properly. The petition explains the factual and legal basis for recognizing the asset as trust property and includes declarations and documentary evidence. Proper filing and service are essential to avoid delays and to give interested parties an opportunity to respond. We handle administrative formalities and guide trustees through expectations for court scheduling and potential responses from other parties.
We draft a clear petition that organizes facts, legal authority, and exhibits so the judge can readily assess the settlor’s intent. Exhibits typically include trust excerpts, deeds, correspondence, and declarations that directly tie the asset to the trust. A well-organized filing addresses foreseeable questions and presents a logical narrative for judicial review. Attention to exhibit labeling, concise declarations, and accurate citation to records helps the court resolve the issue more efficiently and reduces the need for supplemental materials.
Proper service and notice are necessary to give beneficiaries, creditors, or other interested parties a chance to respond to the petition. We handle the mechanics of serving documents, filing proof of service, and addressing any objections or requests for additional information. Ensuring that all parties receive timely and correct notice preserves the petition’s validity and reduces the risk of later procedural challenges. We also communicate with potential respondents to explore whether a negotiated resolution can avoid contested hearing time.
After filing and service, the matter proceeds to hearing if required, where the judge reviews the petition, declarations, and exhibits. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property or directing reformation of title. We then assist in carrying out the order’s directives, such as preparing recording documents, coordinating with county recorders, and notifying financial institutions. The post-order phase ensures the court’s ruling takes practical effect and that the trust can continue administration without lingering title issues.
At the hearing, the petition and supporting declarations are presented for the judge’s evaluation. We organize evidence in a concise manner and respond to questions the court may have about intent, timing, or title history. If objections arise, we address them with documented facts and legal argument. The goal at hearing is to secure an order that clearly defines how the asset will be treated going forward and to ensure the record supports effective implementation of the court’s directive.
Once the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership or directing reformation, we assist with the administrative steps to implement that order. This may include preparing documents for recording, working with title companies or financial institutions to retitle accounts, and filing any necessary recordings with county recorders. Proper implementation turns the court’s ruling into practical control for the trustee, allowing trust administration to proceed and beneficiaries to receive distributions consistent with the trust’s terms.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to recognize that assets titled in a decedent’s name were intended to be trust property, allowing them to be administered under the trust rather than through a separate probate for those items. The petition presents documentary and testimonial evidence showing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust and requests an order that aligns title with that intent. Courts assess whether the totality of evidence supports treating the asset as part of the trust and may order reformation or recognition of trust ownership accordingly. The petition can be particularly useful when deeds, accounts, or other titles were overlooked before the settlor’s death and when obtaining a court order will enable financial institutions or recorders to transfer or retitle assets to the trustee. A successful petition avoids the need for separate probate administration of those specific assets, improves clarity for beneficiaries, and supports the trustee’s authority to manage and distribute trust property according to the trust instrument.
A trustee should consider filing a Heggstad petition when an asset clearly appears to have been intended for the trust but remains titled in the decedent’s name, and when nonjudicial retitling is impossible or impractical because institutions require a court order. Other triggers include title discrepancies, complex chain-of-title problems, or situations where the asset’s value or the potential for disputes warrants judicial confirmation. A petition is also appropriate when the trustee needs definitive authority to manage or distribute the asset under trust terms. Before filing, trustees should gather available documentation and consult legal counsel to evaluate the strength of the evidence and whether alternative remedies are available. Counsel can advise on the likely outcomes in local court and help prepare declarations and exhibits to present a clear case, avoiding unnecessary filings when a simpler administrative transfer is feasible.
Common evidence includes the trust document, any draft deeds or attempted transfers, correspondence indicating the settlor’s intent, and payment records showing how the settlor managed the asset for trust purposes. Declarations from the trustee, family members, attorneys, or professionals who witnessed the settlor’s intent can be useful. Title history and public records that demonstrate a pattern of treating the asset as part of the trust also strengthen the petition. In some cases, the court may consider the settlor’s conduct, such as having scheduled the asset with the trust, changing insurance or tax information, or making payments from the asset as though it were trust property. A well-organized set of documents and declarations that tie these facts together improves the petition’s persuasiveness and helps the court reach a clear decision.
The timeline varies depending on the complexity of the title issues, the court’s calendar, and whether objections are filed. In relatively clear-cut cases with thorough documentation and no opposition, the process may be completed in a matter of months. Complex matters, contested petitions, or issues requiring additional discovery can extend the timeline to longer periods. Local court schedules in Contra Costa County and the specifics of the estate will influence the overall duration. Working proactively to assemble complete evidence and addressing title concerns ahead of filing can shorten the process. Promptly responding to court requests and coordinating with recorders or financial institutions after a court order are also important to keep the matter moving forward. Counsel can provide a realistic timeline after reviewing the details of a particular case.
A Heggstad petition can avoid separate probate for the affected assets when the court recognizes those assets as trust property, but its effectiveness depends on the strength of the evidence and whether any interested parties contest the petition. When the court issues an order recognizing trust ownership, that order typically provides the trustee with the necessary authority to manage and distribute the asset under trust terms. However, if there are competing claims or creditor issues, additional proceedings may be needed to resolve those matters. It is important to remember that while a Heggstad petition can address ownership recognition, it does not automatically eliminate legitimate creditor claims or other encumbrances. Trustees should be prepared to address liens, taxes, and creditor notices as part of administration, and counsel can advise on how a court order will interact with those obligations and whether further steps are necessary to clear title or satisfy claims.
Beneficiaries or other interested parties can object to a Heggstad petition, and the court will consider any raised issues before deciding. Objections may assert that the settlor did not intend the asset to be part of the trust, that the trust was improperly executed, or that competing claims exist. When objections are filed, the matter may require additional evidence, depositions, or a contested hearing, which can extend the timeline and increase costs for trustees and beneficiaries. When objections arise, counsel will work to address them through documentation, legal argument, or negotiated resolution where appropriate. Sometimes objections can be resolved through clarification of records or agreements among parties. When resolution is not possible, a hearing may be necessary to allow the court to weigh competing evidence and issue a definitive ruling on ownership and how the asset should be handled.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include seeking administrative transfers through banks or title companies when they accept documentation showing trust intent, using affidavit procedures available for small estates, or negotiating voluntary transfers among beneficiaries. In straightforward situations where institutions will cooperate, these nonjudicial solutions can be faster and less costly than court petitions. Sometimes corrective deeds or other administrative filings can place property into the trust without seeking a court order. However, when institutions require a court order, titles are complex, or there is a risk of challenge, a Heggstad petition may be the most reliable path to secure recognition and enable effective trust administration. Legal counsel can assess whether an administrative remedy is likely to succeed or whether a petition offers more certainty given the facts and local practice.
Costs for preparing and filing a Heggstad petition vary with the complexity of the title history, the amount of evidence needed, and whether the matter becomes contested. Reasonable fees typically reflect time spent gathering records, preparing declarations, drafting court filings, and handling service and court appearances. Additional expenses may include filing fees, recorder fees, and costs associated with obtaining certified documents or title reports. Contested matters or extended litigation will increase costs compared to an uncontested petition. We provide an upfront discussion of likely fees and can outline steps to limit costs, such as focused evidence collection and efforts to reach agreement with interested parties. An early assessment helps trustees weigh potential expense against the benefit of obtaining a court order that clarifies ownership and supports efficient trust administration.
A Heggstad petition primarily addresses ownership and recognition of assets for trust administration, but it does not eliminate legitimate creditor claims against the estate or trust. Creditors must still be notified in accordance with probate rules or the trust’s terms, and liens or valid claims may need to be satisfied before assets are freely distributed. The court will consider the effect of recognizing trust ownership on creditor rights and may require procedures to ensure claims are handled appropriately. Trustees should coordinate petition efforts with obligations to notify creditors and address outstanding debts. Counsel can advise on how a court order will interact with creditor claims, whether additional steps are necessary to protect the trust from future claims, and how to incorporate creditor resolution into the administration plan so distributions proceed in accordance with legal priorities.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists trustees and families by reviewing trust documents, identifying supporting evidence, preparing declarations, drafting the Heggstad petition, and handling filing and service requirements. We work to present a clear factual record and legal argument to the probate court and to coordinate any necessary post-order recording or title updates. Our goal is to obtain recognition of trust ownership where the evidence supports it and to minimize delays in trust administration. We also advise on alternatives and practical steps to retitle assets without court involvement when feasible, communicate with title companies and financial institutions, and help address objections or competing claims if they arise. By guiding clients through each phase of the process, we strive to secure reliable outcomes that allow trustees to manage and distribute trust property in a manner consistent with the settlor’s wishes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas