A Heggstad petition allows family members or the trustee to ask a Contra Costa County court to recognize property as trust assets when the decedent intended the assets to be in a trust but title was never formally transferred. For Vine Hill residents, this procedure can prevent a lengthy probate and align the estate administration with the decedent’s documented intentions. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we handle these matters with careful attention to California trust and probate law. Our goal is to help you protect family assets and complete trust administration with steady legal guidance and clear explanations throughout the process.
When plans did not proceed exactly as intended, a Heggstad petition provides a practical route to have assets recognized as part of a trust based on prior actions, documents, and the decedent’s intent. The petition is particularly useful when accounts, real estate, or other assets remain in the decedent’s name after trust documents were signed. Pursuing a Heggstad petition can reduce estate administration costs and delay, and it can make distribution follow the trust’s terms rather than the probate court’s default rules. If you are in Vine Hill or nearby areas, reaching out early helps preserve evidence and move through the court steps efficiently.
Filing a Heggstad petition is a focused legal remedy tailored to situations where the decedent clearly intended to fund a trust but some assets were never retitled. The primary benefit is that it seeks judicial recognition of trust ownership without resorting to full probate. That can save time and reduce administrative expenses, and it can help maintain privacy by avoiding public probate proceedings. In addition, a successful petition provides clarity to beneficiaries and financial institutions, enabling the trustee to manage and distribute assets according to the trust terms. For families in Vine Hill, this process can preserve the decedent’s legacy while minimizing stress and uncertainty.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services to clients across Contra Costa County and the Bay Area. Our attorneys focus on clear communication and careful preparation for trust-related court matters like Heggstad petitions. We prioritize gathering documentation, preparing persuasive filings, and coordinating with trustees and beneficiaries to reduce disputes and delays. Whether the issue involves a small account or real property, our approach emphasizes thorough case preparation and practical solutions that protect family interests. Call 408-528-2827 to discuss how we can help address trust funding issues in Vine Hill and surrounding communities.
A Heggstad petition asks a California court to declare that certain assets belong to a trust based on the decedent’s prior actions, documents, and intent. This remedy often arises when a trust was created but some assets were never retitled in the trustee’s name. To succeed, petitioners present evidence such as signed trust documents, transfer attempts, beneficiary communications, or other conduct showing the decedent intended the trust to own the asset. The court then decides whether to treat the asset as trust property for administration and distribution purposes. Understanding how courts evaluate intent and supporting evidence is key to preparing a persuasive petition in Contra Costa County.
The Heggstad process is not automatic and requires careful factual development and legal argument. Courts typically weigh documentary proof and contemporaneous actions that indicate the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Examples include trust provisions naming the asset, transfer paperwork left incomplete, or notes and communications indicating intent. A trustee or beneficiary often files the petition, and interested parties receive notice so they may object. If the court grants the petition, the asset is treated as trust property and administered according to the trust. That outcome can streamline distribution and reduce the need for formal probate administration.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing in California probate court that requests a judicial declaration that an asset should be treated as part of a trust despite being titled differently at death. The petition usually recites the trust creation, identifies the asset, and explains why the decedent intended the trust to own the asset. Supporting evidence may include the trust document, unfinished transfer forms, statements by the decedent, and actions taken by the trustee. The court will consider this record and any objections before ruling. When granted, the order allows the trustee to manage and distribute the asset under trust terms instead of subjecting it to probate distribution rules.
A successful Heggstad petition requires a clear presentation of the trust document, evidence of the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, and proof of steps taken toward transferring the asset. The usual process begins with gathering documentation, preparing the petition and supporting declarations, and filing with the appropriate probate court in Contra Costa County. Notice is provided to heirs and interested parties, who may object. The court evaluates the record at a hearing and issues an order deciding whether to treat the asset as trust property. Properly handled, this process can align asset ownership with the decedent’s estate plan without full probate.
Familiarity with common trust and probate terms makes it easier to navigate a Heggstad petition. This glossary highlights terms you will encounter, including trust, trustee, probate, pour-over will, and funding. Each term relates to how assets are managed and whether they pass outside probate to a trust. Understanding these definitions helps trustees and beneficiaries collect the right documents and present convincing proof to the court. If you have questions about any term or how it applies to your situation in Vine Hill, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can provide clear explanations and practical next steps to protect family assets and follow the decedent’s intent.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to recognize property as held in trust even though legal title is not in the trustee’s name at the decedent’s death. The petition must demonstrate that the decedent intended the trust to own the property, typically using the trust document, transfer attempts, correspondence, and other relevant evidence. The court evaluates the totality of the circumstances and issues an order if it finds the decedent’s intent was clear. This remedy helps transfer assets to the trustee for distribution under the trust, avoiding or reducing probate administration when successful.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs any assets remaining in the decedent’s individual name to be transferred into the trust upon the decedent’s death. It acts as a catch-all to ensure assets not previously titled in the trust are ultimately distributed according to the trust’s terms. While a pour-over will still requires probate to move assets into the trust, the will coordinates distribution and provides continuity of the estate plan. When a pour-over will exists alongside a trust, a Heggstad petition may also be used to assist in recognizing trust ownership for specific assets based on prior intent.
A revocable living trust is a legal arrangement in which a person transfers property to a trust during life, retains the power to change or revoke the trust, and designates beneficiaries to receive trust assets after death. It commonly names a trustee to manage assets and a successor trustee to act upon incapacity or death. While such a trust can avoid probate for properly titled assets, it is effective only when the creator retitles assets into the trust. When assets remain in the creator’s name, tools like a Heggstad petition may be used to have those assets recognized as trust property if the intent to fund the trust is demonstrated.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering an estate when a person dies owning assets in their individual name without effective nonprobate transfer mechanisms. Probate involves validating wills, appointing a personal representative, inventorying assets, paying debts and taxes, and distributing remaining assets according to the will or state law. Because probate is public and can be time-consuming, many people use trusts to pass assets outside probate. A Heggstad petition seeks to reduce the need for probate by having the court recognize assets as belonging to a trust based on the decedent’s intent and supporting evidence.
When an asset was intended to be in a trust but remains titled otherwise, you typically have several options: file a Heggstad petition, pursue full probate, or, where available, use small estate procedures. A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare trust ownership and can avoid the time and public nature of probate. Full probate resolves estate administration comprehensively but can be more involved and visible. Small estate processes are limited by asset value and eligibility rules. Evaluating these options requires reviewing the asset, available evidence, and family circumstances to determine the most efficient and protective path in Contra Costa County.
A focused Heggstad filing can be the right approach when documentation plainly shows the decedent intended a particular asset to be in the trust. Examples include completed but unrecorded transfer forms, named assets described in the trust, or contemporaneous communications indicating the decedent’s intent. In such cases, the court may find the evidence persuasive and recognize trust ownership without the need for a full probate administration. Choosing this route can shorten resolution time and reduce costs, provided careful proof is presented and interested parties receive proper notice under California probate rules.
A limited Heggstad petition is often practical when the estate is not complex and there are relatively few heirs or potential objectors. When family circumstances are straightforward and potential heirs either support the trust’s treatment of the asset or do not contest it, a targeted petition can resolve the ownership question efficiently. This approach concentrates on proving the decedent’s intent for the specific property rather than administering the entire estate. It suits situations where avoiding a lengthy probate process benefits beneficiaries and the trustee while still providing the court’s authority for trust administration.
A comprehensive legal approach may be necessary when there is disagreement about the decedent’s intent or when multiple heirs may challenge the trust claim. In those situations, a broader case strategy involves detailed factual investigation, preservation of records, and readiness for contested hearings. Preparing for potential objections requires careful legal research and a coordinated presentation of evidence. This thoroughness helps protect the trustee’s ability to demonstrate trust ownership and anticipate opposing arguments. When family dynamics are complex, a more extensive legal plan can reduce surprises and better position the matter for a favorable resolution.
If the situation involves multiple assets, mixed titles, or complicated ownership histories, a comprehensive approach is often warranted. Preparing a Heggstad petition under such circumstances may require tracing asset transfers, coordinating with financial institutions, resolving title defects, and addressing creditor or tax concerns. Managing these elements together helps ensure that the court order, if granted, effectively transfers control of the assets into the trust and avoids future disputes. A thorough strategy reduces the risk of partial resolutions and helps carry out the decedent’s overall estate plan across all affected assets.
A comprehensive approach to handling trust funding problems can minimize the potential for later disputes and unforeseen complications. By thoroughly documenting the decedent’s intent, reviewing title and account records, and coordinating notice to interested parties, the trustee can present a stronger case to the court. This diligence helps secure a clear judicial order that trustees and financial institutions can rely upon when moving assets into trust administration. For family members in Vine Hill, such completeness can reduce administrative delays and foster a smoother transfer of assets to beneficiaries consistent with the deceased’s wishes.
Beyond avoiding immediate probate costs, a careful and complete legal process can preserve estate value by resolving title issues, addressing creditor claims, and ensuring the trust order is enforceable in future dealings with banks and registries. Taking the time to coordinate with all relevant parties and to prepare a well-supported petition reduces the chance of post-judgment challenges. That level of preparation improves the likelihood that distributions proceed without further court intervention, giving beneficiaries a firmer path to receive their inheritance as set forth in the trust.
A thorough legal approach increases the likelihood of a definitive court order that clearly states trust ownership, which reduces the chance of subsequent litigation. By compiling comprehensive records, securing supporting declarations, and addressing potential objections early, trustees can limit ambiguity that might otherwise invite challenges. This proactive stance helps protect beneficiaries and streamlines later administration. For families in Vine Hill, the resulting peace of mind and reduced legal friction are significant advantages, enabling assets to be managed and distributed more predictably and in line with the decedent’s intentions.
When a petition is prepared thoroughly and supported by court orders and clear records, banks, brokerage firms, and title companies are more likely to cooperate in retitling or releasing accounts to the trustee. This coordination reduces administrative hurdles and shortens the time required to transfer assets. A complete approach anticipates documentation requests and resolves title problems before they delay distributions. The outcome is a more efficient transition of assets to beneficiaries, helping families move forward without prolonged uncertainty while complying with applicable California procedures and requirements.
Begin by collecting the trust document, any signed or partially completed transfer forms, bank statements, deeds, beneficiary designations, and correspondence that reflect the decedent’s intent. The strength of a Heggstad petition often depends on assembling contemporaneous records showing the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Organize documents chronologically and create a list of who holds original or duplicate records. Proper organization speeds the preparation of declarations and the petition, and it makes it easier to respond to court inquiries or requests from interested parties during the proceeding.
If records reveal inconsistent ownership histories or clerical errors, address them before filing the petition. That may involve obtaining certified copies of deeds, corrected account records, or declarations explaining transfer attempts. Resolving technical title issues early avoids delays and strengthens the petition’s factual basis. Work with registrars, banks, and records offices to secure reliable documentation and be prepared to explain any discrepancies in declarations submitted to the court. Doing so improves the petition’s clarity and reduces the risk of evidentiary challenges during the court’s review.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets were clearly intended to be held by a trust but remain titled in the decedent’s name at death. The petition provides a judicial mechanism to align asset ownership with the decedent’s estate plan and can prevent the need for full probate administration. It is especially valuable when the asset’s value, privacy concerns, or family dynamics make avoiding probate preferable. Filing promptly preserves evidence and helps trustees manage assets without undue delay. For Vine Hill families, pursuing this remedy can protect the trust’s intended distributions and simplify asset transfers.
Another reason to consider a Heggstad petition is to reduce costs and public exposure associated with probate. Probate proceedings are public and can take months or longer; by seeking a judicial recognition of trust ownership, trustees may be able to resolve matters more privately and efficiently. The petition also clarifies legal title for banks and title companies, enabling trustees to access and transfer assets consistent with the trust document. When evidence of intent exists, the Heggstad route often provides a practical balance between formal court oversight and efficient estate administration.
Typical circumstances include real property left in the decedent’s name, retirement accounts or brokerage accounts with outdated beneficiary designations, bank accounts never retitled to the trust, or incomplete transfer paperwork after the trust was signed. These issues can happen due to oversight, timing, or administrative errors. When those gaps exist at death, a Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize trust ownership based on the decedent’s prior intent. Identifying the factual pattern in each situation is key to presenting persuasive evidence that aligns with California probate principles.
Real estate is a common asset left outside a trust because it requires deed recording to change title. If a deed was prepared but not recorded, or if the grantor believed the trust already controlled the property, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize the trust’s interest. Supporting evidence might include a signed deed draft, trust provisions describing the property, or written statements of intent. Resolving property title through the court helps the trustee manage or distribute the real estate according to the trust rather than subjecting it to probate transfer rules.
Financial accounts are often overlooked when funding a trust because retitling requires visiting institutions and completing forms. When accounts remain in the decedent’s individual name, trustees may face difficulty accessing funds. A Heggstad petition can seek recognition that the decedent intended those accounts to be trust assets. Evidence might include account transfer requests, check endorsements, or communications with the bank. The court’s order then allows the trustee to treat accounts as trust property, simplifying distribution and ongoing financial management for beneficiaries.
Administrative oversights such as unsigned forms, missed deadlines, or partial transfer attempts can leave assets improperly titled at death. These technical gaps do not always reflect a change in the decedent’s intent. A Heggstad petition addresses such situations by documenting what was done and why the decedent intended the asset to belong to the trust. Demonstrating that intent with contemporaneous records and witness declarations gives the court the basis to recognize trust ownership and avoid unnecessary probate for otherwise transferable assets.
If you are dealing with assets intended to be in a trust but still titled in the decedent’s name, we can help you evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists trustees and beneficiaries throughout the petition process, from document gathering and petition preparation to court filings and hearings. We aim to provide clear guidance on likely outcomes, required evidence, and steps to minimize delays. For residents of Vine Hill and the surrounding area, timely action helps preserve documentation and supports an efficient path toward trust-based administration.
Our practice focuses on estate planning and trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions and related court proceedings in Contra Costa County. We place a strong emphasis on careful fact gathering, practical legal strategies, and effective communication with trustees and family members. That approach helps identify the most appropriate remedy for trust funding problems and positions filings to achieve the best possible outcome. Clients benefit from personalized attention, clear explanations of legal steps, and coordinated handling of court documents and notice requirements to protect their interests and move matters toward resolution.
When working on a Heggstad petition, we prioritize compiling persuasive evidence, preparing thorough declarations, and addressing any foreseeable objections. We also work with banks, title companies, and other institutions to obtain necessary records and to facilitate retitling when a court order is obtained. Our goal is to reduce uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries and to complete administration in line with the decedent’s intentions. If litigation becomes necessary, we prepare methodically for hearings while seeking to resolve disputes efficiently and with an eye toward preserving family relationships where possible.
We understand the importance of timely action after a trust creator’s death and focus on organizing documentation quickly to preserve evidence and address time-sensitive issues. By coordinating notice to interested parties and presenting clear factual narratives supported by records and declarations, we strive to streamline the court’s decision-making process. Our approach is to provide practical, calm guidance so trustees and beneficiaries can move forward with confidence. For more information or to schedule an initial discussion, contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman at 408-528-2827 to review your situation.
Our process begins with an initial review to identify assets, relevant documents, and potential interested parties. We gather trust documents, deeds, account records, and communications that demonstrate intent to fund the trust. After developing a factual record, we prepare the petition, supporting declarations, and required notices for filing in Contra Costa County probate court. We then manage filings, respond to inquiries, and represent the trustee at any hearings. Throughout the process, we maintain clear communication about timing, likely outcomes, and practical steps to facilitate retitling and distribution if the court grants the petition.
The first step is a careful assessment of the estate and collection of supporting documents to show the decedent’s intent. This includes locating the trust instrument, deeds, bank and brokerage statements, transfer paperwork, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence about asset transfers. We also identify potential interested parties and any pending creditor or tax issues. This document-centric approach ensures the petition is grounded in a well-supported factual narrative, which enhances the chance of success and helps anticipate questions or objections that the court or other parties may raise during the proceeding.
During the initial consultation we review the trust, will, and any available transfer documents, and we discuss the history of attempts to fund the trust. We assess whether the evidence supports a Heggstad petition and identify what additional records or declarations may be needed. This discussion helps set expectations about timing, required documentation, and potential outcomes under California law. It also allows us to plan efficient next steps for notice and filing so that the trustee’s position is presented in a clear and orderly manner to the probate court.
After the initial review we assist in drafting declarations from the trustee, witnesses, or professionals that recount the decedent’s intent and actions taken toward funding the trust. We obtain certified copies of deeds and account records where necessary and prepare a documentary exhibit list. These declarations and documents form the backbone of the petition, telling a consistent story to the court and supporting a declaration that the asset should be considered trust property despite its current title.
Once the record is assembled, we prepare the Heggstad petition, compile all supporting declarations and exhibits, and prepare the required notices for interested parties. The filing is made with the appropriate probate court in Contra Costa County, and we ensure compliance with local procedural rules. Properly drafted filings present the legal basis and factual support for recognizing the asset as trust property, and they also set out proposed orders the court can sign if it agrees with the petition’s arguments.
Drafting the petition includes laying out a clear statement of facts, legal citations where appropriate, and a request for the court to determine that the asset belongs to the trust. We organize exhibits and declarations so the court can quickly understand the chain of events and the decedent’s intent. This stage also involves preparing a proposed order and other court forms necessary to move the matter smoothly through the probate calendar in Contra Costa County.
Before or after filing, depending on procedure, we ensure proper service of notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties who must be informed of the petition. Service requirements are strictly applied by the court, so we take care to follow California rules for notice and proof of service. Proper notice provides an opportunity for parties to object and helps the court resolve any competing claims in an orderly fashion, which in turn supports a reliable judicial determination of trust ownership.
After filing and service, the probate court schedules review, which may include a hearing if objections arise. We prepare the trustee and witnesses for possible testimony and coordinate responses to any opposing filings. If the court is persuaded by the petition and supporting evidence, it will issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property. That order then empowers the trustee to manage and distribute the asset under the trust, enabling practical transfer or sale as required by the trust’s terms and simplifying subsequent administration.
If objections are filed, we evaluate their basis and prepare legal and factual responses to address contested issues. This includes refining declarations, identifying counter-evidence, and preparing witnesses for a court hearing. Effective hearing preparation emphasizes clarity of proof and the legal standards the court should apply. Our goal is to present a focused record that demonstrates the decedent’s intent and the trust’s rightful claim to the asset, so the court can reach a reasoned resolution consistent with California probate law.
Once the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, we assist in implementing that order with banks, title companies, and other institutions. This includes preparing certified copies of court orders, coordinating with registrars for deed changes, and submitting documentation required by financial institutions to retitle accounts. Ensuring smooth implementation of the court order helps the trustee take control of assets and carry out distributions according to the trust, reducing the need for further court intervention and facilitating the final administration of the trust estate.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks a judge to declare a particular asset belongs to a trust despite the asset remaining titled in the decedent’s name. It is used where the decedent clearly intended the asset to be included in the trust but the formal transfer or retitling was not completed before death. The petition presents documentary and testimonial evidence of that intent so the court can give effect to the trust’s terms for that asset. Petitions of this type focus narrowly on ownership recognition rather than full probate administration. They are commonly used to avoid the public and sometimes lengthy probate process for specific items, such as real estate or bank accounts, when adequate proof of intent exists and interested parties are properly noticed under California rules.
Timing varies based on the case complexity, court schedule, and whether any parties object. In straightforward matters without objections, the process may move more quickly, often within a few months to allow for filing, required notice, and the court’s review. If objections arise or title issues are complex, the matter can take longer while disputes are addressed through additional filings or hearings. Because local probate calendars and procedures differ, working proactively to assemble evidence and provide proper notice helps shorten the timeline. Early preparation of declarations and documentary exhibits makes the petition clearer for the court and can reduce delays associated with requests for additional information or clarification.
The most helpful evidence includes the trust document itself, any signed but unrecorded transfer instruments, bank or account records indicating transfer attempts, and written communications or witness declarations that reflect the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Deeds, account statements, and contemporaneous notes or emails can be persuasive when they show consistent intent or actions taken to move assets into the trust. Declarations from the trustee or individuals who witnessed the decedent’s planning steps are also valuable. A well-organized package of documents and clear witness statements provides the court with the factual narrative needed to recognize the asset as trust property under applicable California standards.
A Heggstad petition can reduce the need for full probate for the specific assets it addresses by having the court declare those items to be trust property. However, it does not automatically resolve all estate matters; other assets that remain solely in the decedent’s name may still require probate. The petition is a tool to align particular assets with the trust and thereby minimize probate exposure for those items. For a comprehensive avoidance of probate, all significant assets would need to be properly transferred to nonprobate mechanisms or otherwise disposed of through beneficiary designations or joint ownership. A Heggstad petition is focused on correcting funding oversights for specific assets rather than replacing a complete estate plan review.
Typically, the trustee named in the trust files the Heggstad petition to obtain a judicial declaration that a particular asset belongs to the trust. In some cases, a beneficiary with an interest in the trust may also petition, especially when there is no acting trustee or the trustee is unable to act. The petitioner must show standing and a sufficient factual basis for the court to consider the claim. Before filing, it is important to identify and notify all interested parties, including heirs and potential creditors, to comply with California notice requirements. Proper notice and legal standing help ensure the court can adjudicate the matter fairly and reduce procedural complications.
Heirs might object on grounds that the decedent did not clearly intend the asset to be in the trust, that the documents are ambiguous, or that the petitioner lacks authority to seek the order. Other objections could question the authenticity of documents or assert competing ownership claims. When objections occur, the court will weigh the evidence presented by both sides to determine the decedent’s intent and the appropriate disposition of the asset. Addressing potential objections requires careful preparation and clear documentation. Preparing responsive declarations and corroborating evidence helps the court resolve disputes and increases the chance that the trustee’s requested relief will be granted despite opposition.
Yes, in most cases a properly issued court order recognizing trust ownership will be accepted by banks, title companies, and other institutions once presented with certified copies and supporting documentation. The court order serves as judicial confirmation of the trustee’s authority over the asset, and institutions generally update records or retitle property accordingly when provided with the order and required proofs. However, some institutions may have additional administrative requirements before retitling, such as insurer or lender consents for real property. We assist trustees in coordinating with these entities to ensure the order is implemented smoothly and to anticipate any extra steps required by particular institutions.
If key documents are missing, alternatives may include using witness declarations, secondary records, or identifying other contemporaneous evidence that demonstrates the decedent’s intent. In some circumstances, a different probate procedure or a negotiated resolution with heirs may be more practical. Each case is fact-specific, and options depend on the availability of proof and the parties involved. When working with incomplete records, careful investigation and thorough collection of any available corroborating material are essential. Even if the ideal documents are not available, a court may consider a broader factual record if it sufficiently demonstrates the decedent’s intent to place the asset in the trust.
Court appearances depend on the specific matter and whether objections arise. Many Heggstad petitions proceed with limited in-person involvement, especially when no party objects and the court can decide on the written record and declarations. If a hearing is scheduled due to objections, a trustee or representative may need to appear in court to present testimony or respond to questions. We prepare clients for both possibilities and help arrange representation so trustees do not need to handle court procedures alone. When an appearance is required, we guide witnesses through testimony preparation and coordinate with the court to present a clear, organized case.
Begin by collecting the trust instrument, any deeds or account documents, correspondence about transfer attempts, and information about potential interested parties. Document conversations and locate copies of any incomplete transfer forms. This initial organization provides a foundation for evaluating whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and what additional evidence may be required. Contact a probate or trust attorney to review the assembled materials and discuss next steps. Early legal review identifies gaps and preservation needs, helps ensure proper notice procedures are followed, and sets the case on a path for timely filing in Contra Costa County if a petition is warranted.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas