If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Waldon, a trust modification petition may be the appropriate path to update terms, remove or add trustees, or address changed circumstances. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients understand the legal framework for modifying trusts under California law and guide them through the petition process when court involvement is necessary. This guide explains typical reasons for modification, the petition procedure, and how to preserve the settlor’s intent while complying with state requirements. We serve individuals and families throughout Contra Costa County and surrounding communities.
Modifying a trust can be driven by many life events such as remarriage, divorce, changes in financial circumstances, tax considerations, or the need to clarify beneficiary designations. When an amendment or restatement is not possible or when a trust is irrevocable, a court petition may be required to authorize changes. This page walks through the legal options, highlights when a court petition is necessary, and outlines what to expect during the process. If you have questions about a trust signed years ago or need to correct errors, prompt action can protect assets and beneficiaries’ interests.
A trust modification petition can preserve the original goals of a settlor while adapting to new facts and circumstances that were unforeseeable at the time the trust was drafted. Seeking modification through the court ensures that changes are legally enforceable and that all interested parties have an opportunity to be heard. This process can reduce uncertainty, prevent disputes among beneficiaries, and allow for updates that reflect current family relationships, financial realities, or tax laws. When handled carefully, a court-authorized modification helps ensure assets are managed and distributed consistent with the settlor’s updated intentions and legal requirements.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused estate planning and trust administration services across Contra Costa County and San Jose. Our approach centers on clear communication, practical solutions, and careful legal analysis tailored to each family’s situation. We assist clients with drafting petitions, negotiating with beneficiaries, preparing supporting documentation, and representing clients in court when necessary. Our goal is to minimize conflict, expedite resolution, and protect your legacy. We invite you to call our office to discuss whether a trust modification petition is appropriate for your circumstances and to learn about the steps involved.
In California, trusts may be modified either by agreement of the parties involved or by petition to the court when modification is necessary and the settlor’s intent or legal requirements create obstacles. A trust modification petition is a formal request asking the court to approve changes when a direct amendment is impossible, the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, or the trust is irrevocable. The petition must explain the reasons for modification, demonstrate how the proposed changes serve the trust’s purpose, and address any objections from beneficiaries. Understanding the legal standards and evidentiary requirements can help you make informed decisions before filing.
Filing a trust modification petition involves procedural steps such as preparing the petition, notifying interested parties, and presenting supporting evidence at a hearing. Courts evaluate whether the proposed changes comply with state law, respect the settlor’s intent, and protect beneficiaries’ rights. Evidence might include the trust instrument, correspondence, declarations about changed circumstances, and financial records. It’s important to anticipate potential disputes and consider strategies to resolve conflicts through negotiation or mediation prior to court. Proper preparation increases the likelihood of a favorable and timely outcome.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing requesting that a court alter the terms of an existing trust where informal amendment is not feasible or where court intervention is needed to address ambiguities, errors, or changed circumstances. Common situations include correcting drafting mistakes, adjusting for unforeseen tax consequences, replacing an incapacitated trustee, or adapting to changes in family dynamics. The petition must clearly state the requested modification and justify it under California trust law. The court’s role is to ensure that any modification aligns with the trust’s purposes and protects beneficiary interests before approving substantive changes.
A successful trust modification petition typically includes a clear statement of the relief sought, supporting factual declarations, legal arguments grounded in state statutes and case law, and proper notice to all interested parties. Preparing the petition requires gathering the trust document and related records, identifying relevant beneficiaries and their addresses, and assembling evidence to show why modification is warranted. After filing, the court will review the petition, consider any objections, and may hold a hearing. The process can include negotiation, settlement discussions, or formal litigation depending on the complexity and the parties’ willingness to resolve disputes.
Understanding commonly used terms can demystify the process and help you communicate effectively with counsel and the court. Terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, irrevocable and revocable trust, petition, decree, and accounting frequently arise in trust modification matters. Becoming familiar with these definitions helps stakeholders understand rights, duties, and procedural obligations throughout the petition process. Below are concise definitions of principal terms you are likely to encounter. If a specific term is unclear in your case, seeking clarification early prevents misunderstandings and supports informed decision making.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and initially transferred assets into it. The settlor’s intentions and directions contained in the trust document are central to any modification request, and courts strive to honor those intentions while considering changes that may be necessary due to new circumstances. If the settlor is alive, changes may, in some cases, be made directly by the settlor. When the settlor is incapacitated or deceased, courts weigh proposed modifications against the documented wishes and purpose of the original trust to determine whether a petition should be granted.
The trustee is the individual or institution responsible for managing trust assets according to the trust document and applicable law. Duties of a trustee include administering assets prudently, keeping accurate records, providing accountings to beneficiaries, and following distribution instructions. In a modification matter, replacing, removing, or clarifying the trustee’s powers is a common reason for petitioning the court. The court will evaluate whether proposed changes to trustee authority or succession better serve the trust’s objectives and protect beneficiary interests while ensuring proper asset stewardship.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits, distributions, or property under the terms of the trust. Beneficiary rights include receiving notice of petitions that affect their interests and the ability to object to proposed modifications. Courts consider the impact of requested changes on beneficiaries, especially when modifications alter distribution rights or priorities. Transparent communication and documentation of the reasons for changes can reduce disputes and help courts assess whether the proposed modifications are consistent with the trust’s purposes and fair to the parties involved.
A revocable trust can generally be amended or revoked by the settlor during life, while an irrevocable trust typically cannot be changed without court approval or consent from interested parties. Trust modification petitions are often required for irrevocable trusts or when the settlor lacks capacity to amend a revocable trust. The legal standards for modification depend on the trust type and relevant statutes. Courts examine whether the alteration preserves the settlor’s intent and whether changes are necessary to address unforeseen circumstances or to correct defects that hamper administration or produce unintended consequences.
When considering changes to a trust, there are several legal routes that may be available. If the settlor is competent, a direct amendment or restatement of the trust may be the simplest option. Where all affected parties agree, a written settlement or consent may achieve the desired change without court intervention. When a settlor cannot act or parties disagree, a trust modification petition becomes necessary to seek judicial approval. Each option has tradeoffs in terms of cost, timing, privacy, and finality, and selecting the right path depends on facts such as settlor capacity, trust terms, beneficiary consensus, and the nature of the proposed change.
If the settlor is alive and has legal capacity, making direct amendments to a revocable trust is often the most efficient way to update terms. This direct approach keeps the process private and minimizes legal costs and delay. It is particularly appropriate when changes are straightforward such as updating beneficiary designations, replacing a trustee, or clarifying distribution instructions. Ensuring the amendment is properly executed and recorded where necessary helps prevent later disputes. Consultation about potential tax or estate planning consequences remains advisable even when the settlor makes direct changes.
When all interested parties are willing to sign a written agreement to modify the trust, that consensual approach can avoid court proceedings and preserve family privacy. A settlement or consent document should be carefully drafted to ensure the agreement is binding and clearly reflects the intended outcome. This approach is commonly used when minor clarifications or reallocations are sought and when beneficiaries prefer an amicable resolution. Even with unanimous agreement, documentation should be thorough to prevent ambiguity and ensure enforceability should any disputes arise later.
Comprehensive legal assistance is often required when dealing with irrevocable trusts or situations where the settlor lacks the capacity to amend the trust personally. In these scenarios, petitioning the court may be the only viable method to effect necessary changes or correct errors. The process can be complex, involving notice to beneficiaries, document preparation, and litigation over contested issues. Experienced legal guidance helps ensure the petition is properly framed, that supporting evidence is persuasive, and that the proposed modification is presented in a manner that aligns with legal standards and the settlor’s original intentions.
When beneficiaries disagree or trust provisions are ambiguous, a trust modification petition supported by comprehensive legal representation can resolve competing interpretations and produce a durable resolution. Contested matters require careful case development, strategic negotiation, and sometimes litigation to protect clients’ rights and the trust’s purposes. Counsel assists with discovery, legal briefing, and presenting evidence at hearing. Thoughtful advocacy and attention to procedural detail help courts understand the practical impact of proposed changes and reach decisions that balance fairness, statutory requirements, and the settlor’s intended result.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification combines careful legal analysis with practical planning to address present needs and reduce the likelihood of future disputes. This method evaluates tax consequences, trustee duties, and beneficiary rights before proposing changes so outcomes are predictable and sustainable. Comprehensive planning can include updating related estate planning documents, coordinating beneficiary communications, and preparing clear court filings if a petition is required. By addressing all aspects of a trust and related instruments, clients obtain solutions that better preserve the settlor’s goals while protecting heirs from avoidable conflicts.
Comprehensive representation also emphasizes risk management, including strategies to minimize litigation exposure and costs. This may involve mediation, settlement discussions, or structuring modifications that limit disruption to asset management and distributions. The result is often a faster and more cost-effective resolution than fragmented or reactive measures. Taking a holistic view ensures that changes made today will not create unintended consequences tomorrow, and helps families move forward with greater certainty about how assets will be administered and distributed in accordance with updated intentions.
A comprehensive process helps ensure that changes truly reflect what the settlor intended and that beneficiaries understand and accept those adjustments where possible. Clear communication and careful documentation reduce the chance of disputes, preserving family relationships and decreasing the stress associated with contested trust matters. By addressing both legal and interpersonal considerations, comprehensive planning seeks outcomes that are legally sound and emotionally mindful, helping families protect both financial assets and personal relationships during times of transition.
When changes are pursued thoughtfully and with full legal support, courts are more likely to approve modifications that are well documented and justified. This legal certainty can prevent later disputes and reduce the possibility of additional litigation that would drain estate assets. A comprehensive approach includes careful drafting, consideration of alternate dispute resolution, and proactive notice to interested parties. These measures work together to create a more stable estate plan and diminish the administrative and financial burdens that contested matters often create for families and trustees.
Before filing a petition, collect the trust instrument and any amendments, related wills such as a pour-over will, beneficiary designations, trust account statements, and correspondence that explains the settlor’s intent. Include documents like a certification of trust, powers of attorney, health care directives, and any prior trust related filings. A thorough document set allows the petition to be drafted with clarity and supports factual claims about changed circumstances or drafting errors. Having full documentation available also facilitates communication with beneficiaries and shortens the time needed to prepare for hearings.
Consider how proposed modifications will impact tax planning, retirement accounts, life insurance structures like irrevocable life insurance trusts, and special needs or pet trusts. Adjustments intended to achieve creditor protection or tax savings should be evaluated for unintended consequences. Review the interplay between a financial power of attorney, advance health care directive, and guardianship nominations where relevant. Comprehensive consideration of tax and asset management implications helps avoid surprises and ensures that changes meet both legal goals and practical financial needs for beneficiaries over time.
There are several common reasons to pursue a trust modification petition, including addressing errors in the original document, updating beneficiary language following life events, correcting inconsistencies between trust terms and other estate planning instruments, or responding to changes in tax law. Modifications may be needed to remove or replace trustees, add provisions for special needs or pet trusts, or clarify distribution timing and conditions. When informal amendment is impractical and beneficiary agreement cannot be secured, a court petition becomes the necessary path to achieve legally enforceable corrections or updates.
Other scenarios warranting a petition include reorganizing assets due to changes in property ownership, integrating retirement plan trusts or irrevocable life insurance trusts, and resolving ambiguities that hinder trust administration. Courts can also grant modifications in the interest of ensuring effective asset management when a trustee is incapacitated or when settlement of competing beneficiary claims is necessary. Prompt attention to these issues reduces the likelihood of protracted disputes and helps maintain orderly trust administration that aligns with the settlor’s intentions and current family circumstances.
Frequent triggers for trust modification petitions include divorce, remarriage, death of a beneficiary or trustee, significant changes in financial circumstances, unanticipated tax consequences, or discovery of drafting errors. These events can create inconsistencies between the trust and the settlor’s current wishes or make original provisions impractical. When parties cannot achieve a consensual resolution, filing a petition helps the court evaluate whether a modification is warranted. Early legal review after any of these developments helps protect beneficiary rights and keeps trust administration on a steady course.
Life events such as marriage, divorce, birth of grandchildren, or the death of a family member often prompt a review of trust provisions. Changes in family structure may alter distribution goals or necessitate the addition of provisions such as guardianship nominations, special needs provisions, or pet trusts. A modification petition becomes important when the trust cannot be amended directly or when descendants and beneficiaries need court clarification. Addressing these changes proactively reduces uncertainty and helps ensure that distributions and fiduciary responsibilities reflect current family relationships and needs.
Drafting mistakes, typographical errors, or ambiguous language in a trust can create confusion about the settlor’s intent and lead to disputes among beneficiaries or trustees. When such errors cannot be corrected informally, a petition to modify the trust provides a formal mechanism to clarify the trust’s meaning. Courts examine the document, any surrounding records, and evidence of intent to determine whether a modification is appropriate. Correcting these issues through the proper legal channels prevents misadministration and aligns the trust’s operation with what the settlor originally intended.
Shifts in tax law, changes in asset composition, or new estate planning goals may make existing trust provisions inefficient or counterproductive. Modifications might be needed to address tax consequences, consolidate assets into retirement plan trusts or irrevocable life insurance trusts, or adapt to altered investment strategies. When these adjustments would affect beneficiary interests or trustee powers, a court petition can authorize the necessary changes while safeguarding legal compliance. Planning with attention to tax and administrative impacts helps preserve estate value for intended beneficiaries.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide focused legal assistance to clients in Waldon and the surrounding areas of Contra Costa County. We help individuals and families assess whether a trust modification petition is necessary, prepare clear and persuasive filings, facilitate communication with beneficiaries, and represent clients at hearings when required. Our office places priority on practical solutions, timely case management, and protecting client interests throughout the process. Reach out to discuss your trust concerns and learn how a thoughtful approach can lead to a stable and enforceable resolution.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offer a client-centered approach that focuses on clear communication, thorough preparation, and practical legal strategies for trust modification matters. We work to understand the family dynamics, financial considerations, and the settlor’s documented intent so that proposed changes are well grounded and presented persuasively. Our process emphasizes minimizing conflict where possible and providing robust representation when disputes require court involvement. Clients benefit from careful attention to procedural details and strong advocacy tailored to the specifics of each case.
We prioritize efficient case management and candid guidance about the options available for updating trust terms. Whether the matter can be resolved through agreement, requires mediation, or proceeds to a petition and court hearing, our team prepares thorough documentation and communicates regularly with clients to set expectations. The goal is to achieve enforceable results that align with clients’ objectives while safeguarding beneficiaries’ rights. Accessibility and responsiveness are central to our client service model, so callers can expect clear answers and practical next steps.
Our office serves clients across Contra Costa County and nearby communities, offering personalized attention to both straightforward and complex trust modification matters. We guide clients through gathering necessary records, preparing compelling petitions, and pursuing resolution through negotiation or the courts as the situation requires. If you have concerns about trustee conduct, ambiguity in trust terms, or need to restructure trust provisions due to life changes, we can help you evaluate options and proceed with confidence. Contact our Waldon-area office to discuss the next steps for your trust.
Our process begins with an initial review of your trust and related documents to determine whether an informal amendment, settlement, or court petition is the appropriate path. We help collect necessary records, identify interested parties, and draft a petition that sets forth the proposed modification and supporting facts. After filing, we manage notices, handle communications with beneficiaries, and represent clients in any hearings or settlement discussions. Throughout the process we prioritize timely updates and practical advice to move the matter toward resolution with minimal disruption to trust administration.
The first step is a detailed assessment of the trust instrument, amendments, related estate planning documents, and any communications that shed light on the settlor’s intent. We evaluate whether amendments or beneficiary agreements are feasible and whether a petition is necessary. Gathering complete financial records, trustee accountings, and evidence of changed circumstances informs the legal strategy. This careful review helps determine the best approach, whether through negotiation, settlement, or court petition, and identifies potential obstacles and timelines for moving forward.
A critical part of the initial phase is identifying all beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties who must be served or notified. Anticipating potential objections allows us to address concerns proactively and consider settlement options. We prepare clear notices and explanations to reduce surprises and build a record of outreach efforts. Understanding who may object and why helps shape the petition’s supporting declarations and legal arguments to improve the likelihood of a favorable court determination.
Collecting supporting evidence such as financial statements, correspondence showing settlor intent, and records of administrative difficulties is essential. This documentation demonstrates the need for modification and supports factual assertions in the petition. Gathering evidence early enables efficient drafting and helps avoid delays caused by supplemental discovery. Well-organized supporting materials also allow for clearer discussions with beneficiaries and the court, increasing the likelihood of acceptance of the requested modification.
After the initial review and evidence collection, we prepare a petition that articulates the proposed modifications and the legal basis for relief. The filing includes declarations, a proposed order, and supporting exhibits such as the trust document and related records. Proper service on interested parties and compliance with procedural rules are critical to avoid challenges to the petition. We also explore opportunities for settlement or mediation while the case is pending to reduce time and expense whenever possible.
Drafting involves precise language to define the scope of the requested modification and the specific changes to trust provisions or trustee powers. The proposed order should be clear and enforceable to avoid later ambiguity. Exhibits and declarations must be carefully organized to provide the court with a complete factual record. Attention to procedural detail and clarity in drafting helps streamline review and supports a persuasive presentation at any hearing.
Proper service of the petition and associated documents is required to ensure all interested parties have an opportunity to respond. We manage the service process and monitor deadlines for objections or responses. If objections arise, we assess their merits and explore negotiation or dispute resolution strategies. Effective handling of responses often reduces litigation risk and can lead to consensual resolutions, but we also prepare to defend the petition vigorously if litigation becomes necessary.
The court may schedule a hearing to consider the petition and any objections. We present arguments, submit evidence, and respond to questions from the judge to demonstrate that the requested modifications are appropriate under California law. If the court grants the petition, it will issue an order authorizing the changes. Following approval, we assist with implementing the modifications, updating trust records, notifying financial institutions, and advising trustees and beneficiaries on the practical effects of the change.
At the hearing, a clear presentation of facts and legal support helps the court assess whether the proposed modification aligns with the trust’s purpose and protects beneficiary interests. We prepare witnesses, organize exhibits, and deliver concise legal arguments tailored to the judge’s concerns. Addressing likely objections in advance and presenting credible evidence about changed circumstances or drafting errors strengthens the petition and increases the likelihood of a favorable result.
After the court approves a modification, implementing the order includes updating trust documents, informing financial institutions, and ensuring trustees have the authority and instructions needed to carry out the revised terms. We assist with preparing amended trust records, filing necessary certifications, and advising trustees on new duties or distribution instructions. Proper implementation helps avoid future disputes and ensures day-to-day trust administration proceeds smoothly under the court-approved changes.
A trust modification petition is usually necessary when the settlor cannot amend the trust directly, when the trust is irrevocable, or when parties disagree about the need for changes. Formal court involvement becomes the route to obtain legally enforceable modifications under these circumstances. Courts review the petition to determine whether changes align with the trust’s purpose and the settlor’s intent, and whether the modification is warranted by changed circumstances or to correct defects. Petitions are also appropriate when the trust language is ambiguous or when administrative challenges impede proper management. Seeking early legal review helps determine whether a direct amendment, a consensual settlement among beneficiaries, or a petition will best achieve your objectives while minimizing cost and delay.
Filing a trust modification petition generally requires the original trust document, any amendments, related wills, accountings, and evidence demonstrating the need for change. Declarations or affidavits outlining factual circumstances, correspondence that reflects settlor intent, and financial records that illustrate administrative difficulties are common supporting materials. Identifying and preparing notices for all beneficiaries and interested parties is also necessary to satisfy procedural requirements. Properly organized documentation reduces delays and strengthens the petition. Early collection of records and clear explanations of the factual basis for the requested modification allow the petition to be framed persuasively and help the court assess whether the proposed changes are in line with statutory standards and the settlor’s intent.
The timeframe for a trust modification petition varies based on factors such as the complexity of the requested changes, whether objections are filed, and local court schedules. Uncontested petitions with complete documentation can sometimes be resolved in a matter of months, while contested matters may take significantly longer due to hearings, discovery, and negotiation. The need for additional evidence or expert opinion can also extend the timeline. Planning for the likely schedule and preparing thoroughly can help minimize delays. Early outreach to beneficiaries to seek resolution and a clear, well-supported petition often lead to faster outcomes than reactive or poorly documented filings, and prompt case management helps keep matters moving through the court system.
Beneficiaries have the right to object to a proposed modification and present reasons why the court should deny the petition. Courts consider those objections along with the petition’s supporting evidence when evaluating whether the requested changes are appropriate. Strong objections grounded in the trust document, established law, or credible evidence of harm to beneficiaries can affect the court’s decision and may result in an amendment being denied or modified. However, objections do not automatically prevent approval. Courts balance objections against the petition’s demonstrated need and alignment with the settlor’s intent. Mediation or negotiation may resolve objections without prolonged litigation, so open communication and thoughtful settlement efforts can reduce the risk that objections will derail needed modifications.
Court filings, including trust modification petitions and associated orders, typically become part of the public record, which means sensitive information may be accessible through court documents unless specific privacy protections are sought. In some cases, counsel can request redaction or seek narrowly tailored orders to protect confidential details, but full privacy cannot be guaranteed when matters are litigated in open court. When privacy is a priority, parties often explore settlement agreements or consent-based modifications that avoid formal court proceedings. Discussing privacy concerns early helps identify strategies to limit public disclosure while still achieving the necessary legal changes and protecting beneficiary interests.
Disputes between beneficiaries during a petition may be managed through negotiation, mediation, or litigation. Courts encourage parties to attempt resolution through alternative dispute resolution where feasible, and a mediated settlement can provide a confidential and often faster path to a mutually acceptable solution. If mediation fails or is impractical, the court will hear objections and make a determination based on the evidence and applicable law. Effective dispute management includes early case assessment, clear documentation, and strategic engagement with opposing parties to identify common ground. Counsel can help structure proposals that address legitimate concerns while preserving the trust’s purpose, often reducing both emotional strain and legal expense for all parties involved.
Yes, replacing or removing a trustee is a common remedy sought through a trust modification petition when the trustee is unable or unwilling to perform duties, is incapacitated, or has engaged in conduct that jeopardizes trust administration. A petition can request appointment of a successor trustee or clarification of trustee powers to ensure trust assets are managed properly. The court will consider the best interests of beneficiaries and the trust’s objectives when deciding whether to authorize a change in trusteeship. Preparing a petition for trustee replacement includes evidence of the trustee’s conduct or incapacity and proposed successor qualifications. Careful documentation and a focus on the trust’s continued effective administration help the court reach a decision that protects the beneficiaries and maintains orderly asset management.
Costs for filing a trust modification petition vary depending on the complexity of the matter, the need for discovery or hearings, and whether the case is contested. Typical expenses include court filing fees, costs for serving notice, attorney time for drafting and litigation, and potential fees for expert witnesses or financial advisers. Contested matters are generally more expensive due to additional motions, hearings, and discovery requirements. Planning and early communication with beneficiaries can reduce expense by encouraging consensual resolutions or narrowing disputed issues. Discussing budget expectations and cost-saving strategies with counsel at the outset helps clients make informed decisions about proceeding with a petition and managing costs throughout the process.
Modifications to a trust can have tax consequences, particularly where changes affect the treatment of retirement accounts, income taxation, or estate tax planning. Proposed alterations to structures such as irrevocable life insurance trusts or retirement plan trusts should be evaluated for tax implications and potential impacts on beneficiaries’ distributions. Careful coordination with financial and tax advisers helps identify risks and design changes that preserve tax benefits where possible. When retirement accounts are involved, beneficiary designations and plan terms may interact with trust provisions in complex ways. Ensuring alignment between plan documents and trust language, and understanding potential tax liabilities, is an important part of thorough modification planning and can prevent unintended financial consequences.
Reducing the likelihood of litigation begins with early communication, thorough documentation, and exploring consensual avenues like settlement or mediation. Providing beneficiaries with clear explanations of the reasons for modification, proposing fair compromises, and presenting a well-supported legal rationale may lead to agreement without involving the court. When disputes are likely, considering mediation as a formal step can preserve relationships and save time and expense compared with prolonged litigation. Additionally, preparing a persuasive petition with strong factual support and complete documentation demonstrates good-faith effort to resolve issues and may encourage settlement. Transparent handling of the process and demonstrating consideration for beneficiary concerns often reduces resistance and fosters more cooperative outcomes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas