At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist Walnut Creek and Contra Costa County residents who need to change the terms of an existing trust. A trust modification petition can address changing family circumstances, errors in the original document, or evolving asset planning goals. Our approach is focused on clear communication, careful review of governing trust documents, and practical options tailored to each client’s situation. We explain the legal standards and likely outcomes so clients can make informed decisions about seeking court approval for modifications while minimizing delay and uncertainty.
Many clients come to us concerned about protecting family assets, aligning trust provisions with new realities, or resolving ambiguities in trust language. A petition to modify a trust is a legal process that may require notice to beneficiaries, factual evidence, and persuasive legal argument. We guide clients through each step, from preliminary document review and strategy development to drafting pleadings and representing them in court if needed. Our goal is to achieve durable, practical modifications that reflect the settlor’s intent and that withstand future challenges while preserving family relationships and property interests.
Trust modification petitions can prevent disputes, correct drafting mistakes, and update trust provisions to reflect current law or changed circumstances. Obtaining a court-approved modification provides legal clarity and formalizes changes so trustees and beneficiaries can act with confidence. Whether addressing beneficiaries’ needs, updating distribution terms, or clarifying ambiguous language, the petition process can reduce the risk of later litigation. Clients benefit from a structured, court-supervised change that respects the settlor’s intent while ensuring that asset administration proceeds smoothly and in accordance with valid legal authority.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves individuals and families across San Jose, Walnut Creek, and throughout California with practical estate planning and trust administration services. Our firm focuses on personalized guidance for trust-related matters, including modification petitions, trust interpretation, and related court filings. We combine a thorough understanding of California trust law with a commitment to clear communication, timely responsiveness, and practical solutions that prioritize client goals. Contact our office at 408-528-2827 to discuss whether a trust modification petition is appropriate for your situation and how we can assist from start to finish.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to change one or more terms of an existing trust when circumstances make the original provisions unsuitable or unclear. Grounds for modification include mistakes in the document, changed financial realities, or events affecting beneficiaries. The process often requires providing notice to interested parties, presenting evidence that supports the requested change, and obtaining a court order that authorizes the adjustment. The court evaluates whether the proposed modification is consistent with the settlor’s probable intent and protects the interests of beneficiaries and trustees.
The procedural and substantive requirements for trust modification vary based on the reason for the change and the trust’s governing terms. Some petitions seek interpretation or reformation due to ambiguity or mistakes, while others pursue modifications because of changed circumstances affecting trust administration. In each case, careful document review and factual development are necessary to support the petition. We prepare pleadings, coordinate required notices, and advocate for a resolution that minimizes disruption to trust administration while ensuring the outcome is legally sound and practicable for the parties involved.
A petition to modify a trust asks the court to alter the trust’s terms, interpret ambiguous language, or correct errors that frustrate the settlor’s intent. Courts may allow modifications for reasons such as mistakes in drafting, changed circumstances that make the original terms impractical, or to conform the document to the settlor’s clear intent when the language is mistaken. The petitioner must present factual evidence and legal argument showing why the modification is appropriate. If granted, the court issues an order that clarifies and formalizes the change, enabling the trustee to carry out the amended terms with legal authority.
The petition process commonly includes an initial review of trust documents, a determination of the basis for modification, and preparation of a formal petition to the probate court. Required steps often involve identifying and notifying beneficiaries and interested parties, submitting supporting evidence such as affidavits or declarations, and, if necessary, presenting live testimony or legal argument at a hearing. Strategic planning is important to narrow issues, anticipate objections, and pursue a resolution that balances speed with thoroughness. Clear, well-documented facts and focused pleadings increase the likelihood of a successful outcome.
Understanding the terminology used in trust modification matters helps clients follow the process and make informed decisions. Common terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, reformation, reallocation, and probate court. Each term has specific legal meaning and implications for trust administration and court proceedings. Knowing these definitions helps clients evaluate proposed changes, understand their rights, and participate effectively in the resolution process. We take time to explain relevant terms in plain language and apply them to your situation so you can evaluate options confidently and with realistic expectations.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and whose intent is central to any petition to modify the document. Courts generally seek to honor the settlor’s intent when considering modifications or interpretations. Evidence about the settlor’s intent may come from the trust language, related documents, or testimony from individuals familiar with the settlor’s objectives. When the settlor is unavailable or incapacitated, courts weigh available evidence carefully to determine the most reasonable construction or appropriate modification that aligns with what the settlor would have intended.
Reformation is a legal remedy that allows a court to change the wording of a trust to reflect the true intention of the settlor when a mistake in the drafting produced language that does not match that intent. This remedy is typically pursued when clear and convincing evidence demonstrates that the trust terms are inconsistent with what the settlor intended. Reformation corrects the written document so the trustee can administer the trust according to the settlor’s actual wishes, rather than the mistaken wording.
A trustee is the individual or institution responsible for managing the trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust for the benefit of beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties to act prudently and in the beneficiaries’ best interests, and they must follow the trust instrument unless a court’s order modifies those terms. When a modification is sought, trustees may be petitioners, respondents, or neutral parties, depending on their role and interests. Trustees must also provide required notices and cooperate with the court’s procedures when a petition is filed.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits under a trust. Beneficiaries have legal rights to notice of proceedings that may affect their interests and may object to proposed modifications that adversely affect them. Courts consider beneficiary rights when evaluating petitions, balancing the settlor’s intent against potential harm to beneficiaries. Engaging beneficiaries early, providing clear notice, and demonstrating why a modification serves the settlor’s intent can reduce conflict and increase the likelihood of a court-approved resolution.
When a trust needs change, parties can sometimes use informal approaches such as trustee action within the trust’s terms or mutual agreement among beneficiaries and trustees. In other cases, formal court modification is the appropriate path to ensure a legally enforceable result. Informal changes may be quicker but may lack the same level of legal protection and clarity if disputes arise later. A court modification creates an official record and binding order that clarifies the trust terms and reduces future uncertainty. Evaluating goals, risks, and the potential for disagreements helps determine the best path forward.
Minor administrative changes, such as updating contact information, replacing a corporate trustee due to organizational changes, or clarifying routine administrative processes, can often be accomplished without a court petition if the trust instrument allows trustees to act within their authority. These types of adjustments typically have minimal impact on beneficiaries’ substantive rights and can be handled cooperatively. However, care should be taken to document the action and communicate transparently with beneficiaries to reduce the likelihood of later disputes or questions about the validity of the change.
When all beneficiaries and the trustee agree to a modification and the trust terms permit changes by unanimous consent, an informal resolution may be possible without court intervention. Such agreements should be carefully documented in writing and should reflect the settlor’s intent as closely as possible. Even when beneficiaries agree, it is wise to ensure that the modification does not violate other legal requirements or unintentionally affect unrelated rights. Obtaining clear, written consent from all interested parties helps ensure that the agreement remains enforceable and reduces the risk of future disputes.
When trust language is ambiguous or contains drafting errors that materially alter intended distributions or trustee powers, a court petition is often required to reform or interpret the document. Courts will examine the trust instrument alongside extrinsic evidence to determine the settlor’s intent and may issue an order that corrects or clarifies the terms. This formal process provides legal certainty for trustees and beneficiaries and reduces the risk of future litigation by establishing an authoritative interpretation or modification that addresses the underlying ambiguity or error.
When beneficiaries or trustees disagree about proposed changes, or when a proposed modification could significantly affect rights or distributions, court intervention provides a neutral forum to resolve conflicts and issue enforceable orders. A formal petition allows evidence to be tested in a hearing and ensures that all interested parties receive proper notice and an opportunity to be heard. Using the court process can result in a clear, binding resolution that protects the rights of all parties and supports orderly trust administration going forward.
A court-approved trust modification offers legal certainty and formalizes changes so trustees can act without concern about later challenges. The court’s involvement can validate changes based on evidence of the settlor’s intent or necessity, reducing ambiguity and the potential for future litigation. For families dealing with complex assets, blended relationships, or evolving circumstances, obtaining a binding judicial order can preserve estate planning goals and protect beneficiaries’ interests. The process also ensures that required notices and procedural safeguards are observed, supporting transparency and fairness in resolving disputed issues.
Involving the court can also streamline future administration by creating an official record that trustees and financial institutions will accept. This can simplify asset transfers, distributions, and dealings with third parties who require documented legal authority. A formal order can settle contentious questions about trustee powers, allocation of property, or interpretation of contingent interests, which reduces friction in ongoing management. Clients who obtain court-approved modifications often find that the clarity provided saves time, expense, and emotional strain down the road compared with unresolved disputes or ad hoc arrangements.
A binding court order resolves uncertainty and provides a reliable basis for trustees and beneficiaries to act. Legal clarity helps trustees administer assets according to the terms the court has approved, ensuring institutions and third parties accept account changes and distributions without additional challenge. Enforceability is particularly important when large assets, retirement accounts, or complex property interests are involved. When a modification is documented through the court process, the outcome carries the weight of judicial authority, reducing the potential for future conflict and protecting the long-term integrity of the trust plan.
A court-supervised modification ensures that beneficiaries receive proper notice and the opportunity to be heard before any change is finalized. This procedural protection preserves due process and helps prevent future challenges based on claims of inadequate notice or unfair treatment. The court considers the interests of all parties and weighs evidence before ordering any change, which can reassure beneficiaries that their rights were considered. Protecting beneficiary rights through the formal process also reduces the risk of later disputes that could reverse or complicate trust administration.
Before filing a petition, collect all relevant estate planning documents, including the trust instrument, amendments, wills, beneficiary designations, and any related correspondence or notes that shed light on the settlor’s intent. Having a complete set of records makes it easier to assess whether a modification is justified and to prepare supporting evidence. Early document gathering also helps identify potential beneficiaries who must receive notice and reduces delays that can arise from searching for missing paperwork. Thorough preparation improves the efficiency of the process and strengthens the factual basis for the petition.
Evaluate whether informal agreement, mediation, or targeted modifications might achieve the desired result with less expense and delay than full litigation. Weigh the potential benefits of a court order against the time and cost involved, and consider how each option affects beneficiaries’ rights and future administration. A strategic approach considers long-term consequences, including how a change will be perceived by financial institutions, successor trustees, and other third parties. Thoughtful planning helps clients choose the path that best aligns with their priorities and the likely practical outcomes.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust contains drafting errors, ambiguous language, or provisions that no longer reflect current circumstances or the settlor’s probable intent. Changes in family structure, asset composition, or tax law can create situations where the original terms are impractical or unfair. A court-approved modification can correct these issues, provide clarity for trustees, and prevent future disputes among beneficiaries. Evaluating the trust instrument and surrounding facts early can reveal whether seeking formal modification is the most appropriate way to preserve the settlor’s goals and ensure orderly administration.
You should also consider filing when disagreements arise among trustees and beneficiaries about how to interpret the trust or when a proposed change affects distribution rights. Litigation risk, the complexity of assets, and the need for an enforceable outcome should factor into the decision. A formal petition can be beneficial when an authoritative court determination will resolve controversy, protect the rights of all parties, and allow the trustee to administer the trust with confidence that actions are legally supportable and consistent with the settlor’s intended plan.
Common circumstances include discovery of drafting mistakes, changes in family relationships such as divorce or remarriage, the need to change trustee provisions due to retirement or incapacity, and updated tax or asset management considerations. Other situations involve clarifying beneficiary designations, addressing omitted assets discovered after the trust was created, or correcting typographical errors that affect distribution. Each circumstance requires a fact-specific analysis to determine whether an informal solution is available or whether a court petition is the most reliable path to a legally binding resolution.
When the trust document contains language that conflicts with other provisions or that does not clearly express the settlor’s intent, beneficiaries and trustees may find it impossible to implement the trust without court guidance. Petitions for reformation or interpretation are appropriate in these cases to correct mistakes or resolve ambiguity. The court assesses extrinsic evidence and the trust’s overall structure to determine the appropriate correction or interpretation, enabling trustees to administer the trust in a way that most closely aligns with the settlor’s probable objectives.
Life events such as divorce, remarriage, the birth of grandchildren, or material changes in asset holdings can make original trust provisions outdated or unworkable. Trust modification may be necessary to realign distributions, update trustee powers, or address the needs of newly relevant beneficiaries. The court will evaluate whether the proposed change better serves the settlor’s intent in light of changed circumstances, and whether it fairly balances the interests of all beneficiaries. Thoughtful, documented rationale for the change supports a well-reasoned petition.
When a trustee is unable or unwilling to serve, when institutional trustees are replaced, or when administrative issues arise that impede trust management, a petition can clarify or modify trustee powers and succession provisions. Court-ordered modifications can authorize practical steps to ensure ongoing administration, including adjusting distribution schedules or clarifying delegation authority. These changes help maintain continuity, prevent administrative delays, and ensure that trustees can meet fiduciary duties while administering the trust efficiently and in the beneficiaries’ best interests.
We provide representation and counsel to residents of Walnut Creek and the surrounding Contra Costa County communities on trust modification matters and related estate planning needs. Our office helps clients evaluate whether a petition is appropriate, prepares the necessary filings, coordinates required notices to beneficiaries, and advocates for a fair resolution in court if needed. Clients receive straightforward guidance about potential outcomes, timelines, and the practical implications of modifications to their trust, making it easier to decide on the best approach for protecting family interests and preserving the settlor’s intent.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for careful document review, practical legal strategies, and responsive client service throughout the petition process. We prioritize clear explanations, realistic expectations, and thoughtful preparation to support a strong factual and legal presentation. Our team works to minimize disruption for trustees and beneficiaries while pursuing outcomes that reflect the settlor’s probable intent. We focus on timely communication so clients understand each step, the evidence required, and likely timelines for resolving trust modification matters in the probate court.
We emphasize a collaborative approach when appropriate, seeking to resolve matters through negotiation or settlement when that best serves our client’s interests. When court intervention is necessary, we prepare detailed pleadings, gather supporting evidence, and present a cogent case to the court. Our goal is to secure a binding, practical resolution that allows trust administration to proceed without ongoing dispute. We also advise on related estate planning updates that may be advisable after a trust modification is completed.
Accessibility and client-focused service are priorities in our practice. We explain procedural requirements, probable timelines, and potential costs so clients can make informed decisions about the path forward. From the initial consultation to resolution, we handle administrative details, coordinate necessary notices, and represent clients at hearings if needed, while keeping them informed at every step. Contact our Walnut Creek office or reach us at 408-528-2827 to discuss how a trust modification petition may resolve your trust-related concerns.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust and related documents to identify the legal basis for modification and the interested parties who must be notified. We then develop a strategy tailored to your objectives, prepare the petition and supporting declarations, and coordinate service of notice to beneficiaries. If hearings are required, we present the factual record and legal argument to the court. Throughout, we keep clients informed of progress and next steps, focusing on achieving a durable result that enables smooth trust administration going forward.
The initial stage involves collecting the trust document, amendments, related estate planning instruments, and any other materials bearing on the settlor’s intent. We review these documents to determine whether grounds for modification, reformation, or interpretation exist, and to identify who must receive notice. This assessment helps shape the legal theory for the petition and guides evidence collection. A careful early review reduces surprises and ensures that the petition is supported by a focused presentation of relevant facts and legal authorities.
We assist clients in gathering supporting evidence such as correspondence, drafts, financial records, and witness statements that illuminate the settlor’s intent or clarify circumstances that justify modification. Affidavits or declarations from individuals familiar with the settlor’s wishes can be powerful evidence. Properly prepared documentation strengthens the petition and helps the court understand the factual background. We guide clients through the evidence collection process to ensure that key documents and witness statements are obtained, organized, and presented in a way that supports the requested relief.
Accurate identification of all interested parties, including beneficiaries, successor trustees, and other persons with legal interests, is essential because proper notice is a procedural requirement. We prepare and serve required notices in accordance with probate rules to ensure that the court process proceeds without procedural challenge. Providing notice allows interested parties to participate, raise objections, or consent to the modification. Meeting notice requirements carefully helps avoid delays and ensures any court order is valid and enforceable.
Once the factual foundation is assembled and interested parties are identified, we draft a formal petition that sets forth the requested modification, the supporting facts, and the legal basis for relief. Supporting filings may include declarations, exhibits, and proposed orders that the court can sign if it grants the petition. Clear, persuasive pleadings focus the court’s attention on the most relevant evidence and legal authorities, which supports a more efficient resolution and increases the likelihood of a favorable result with minimal need for extensive hearings.
We prepare and assemble exhibits, declarations, and a proposed order that implements the requested modification. A well-drafted proposed order gives the court a clear template to formalize the change and helps expedite resolution if the court finds the evidence persuasive. Organizing supporting materials coherently enables the judge to review the basis for relief without unnecessary delay. Careful preparation of the proposed order also helps ensure the court’s ruling reflects the precise terms agreed upon or requested by the petitioner.
We file the petition and related documents with the probate court and handle service of process on interested parties in compliance with applicable rules. Proper filing and service are critical to preserving the court’s jurisdiction and ensuring that proceedings move forward without procedural objections. We track deadlines, proof of service requirements, and any statutory notice periods while keeping clients informed about filing status and next steps. Attention to these procedural details helps prevent delays and supports a timely resolution.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the evidence and legal argument supporting the requested modification and respond to any objections by interested parties. The court may grant the petition, deny it, or issue a narrower order, depending on the evidence presented. Once a modification is approved, we assist with implementing the order through revised trust documents, notices to financial institutions, and guidance for trustees on carrying out the amended provisions. Our goal is to ensure the court’s decision is translated into practical steps for efficient administration.
At any required hearing, we present a focused factual record and legal argument that supports the petition, addressing objections and clarifying the intended effect of the requested modification. We advocate for a resolution that aligns with the settlor’s probable intent while protecting beneficiaries’ rights and facilitating effective administration. Through careful preparation and clear presentation, we work to secure an order that allows trustees to implement the changes with confidence and provides beneficiaries with clarity about their entitlements going forward.
After the court issues an order, we assist in preparing any revised trust documents, certified copies of the order, and notices needed for banks, brokers, and other institutions. We advise trustees on how to carry out distributions or manage assets under the amended terms, and we help resolve any residual questions about interpretation or compliance. Follow-up services ensure that the court’s decision is effectively implemented and that the trust administration proceeds smoothly according to the newly established framework.
A petition may be filed for reasons such as correcting a drafting mistake, clarifying ambiguous provisions, or adjusting terms due to changed circumstances affecting the settlor’s intent. Courts examine the trust instrument and any extrinsic evidence that shows what the settlor intended or why the original wording should be reformed. The petition should present a clear factual basis and legal argument that supports the requested change. Gathering relevant documents and witness statements strengthens the petition and helps the court assess whether modification is warranted. Courts are guided by principles that prioritize the settlor’s probable intent and the protection of beneficiaries’ rights. The degree of proof required may vary depending on whether the petition seeks reformation for mistake or another form of modification, but presenting persuasive, well-documented evidence is always important. Working with counsel helps ensure the petition includes the necessary factual detail and addresses potential objections from interested parties.
The timeline for a trust modification petition depends on factors such as the court’s calendar, the complexity of the factual record, and whether interested parties contest the relief. An uncontested petition supported by clear evidence can move more quickly to resolution, while contested matters may require multiple hearings and additional time for discovery and briefing. Procedural steps like notice and service also add time. Early case assessment and careful preparation can help reduce delays and keep the process focused on the essential issues. Because timelines vary, we provide clients with a realistic estimate based on the specifics of their case, including the number of interested parties and the extent of evidence required. Keeping communication open and promptly responding to requests for documentation or clarification can help expedite the court’s consideration and limit unnecessary postponements.
Yes. Proper notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties is a fundamental part of the trust modification process in California. Serving notice ensures that parties who may be affected have the opportunity to review the petition, raise objections, or consent to the requested change. Failure to provide adequate notice can result in procedural challenges that delay or invalidate the court’s action. We ensure notices are prepared and served according to probate rules to protect the court’s jurisdiction and the validity of any resulting order. Notified parties may choose to participate, negotiate, or object depending on how the proposed modification affects their interests. In many cases, early outreach and transparent information sharing encourage resolution without prolonged litigation. When objections arise, the court evaluates the evidence and arguments from all sides before making a determination intended to protect rights and interpret the settlor’s intent.
Trustees may be able to take certain administrative actions within the scope of their authority under the trust instrument without court approval, such as routine management tasks or replacing a trustee when the trust provides a process. However, substantive changes to distributions or core terms generally require either the consent of all beneficiaries or court approval. Trustees should proceed cautiously and seek legal guidance before making significant changes to avoid breaching fiduciary duties or creating disputes that could lead to litigation. When in doubt about whether an action requires court involvement, seeking legal review can prevent unintended consequences. If the trustee acts beyond the trust’s authority without proper process, beneficiaries may later challenge those actions. Using the proper procedures at the outset helps preserve the trust’s integrity and reduces the likelihood of costly disputes.
Evidence for a reformation claim typically includes the trust instrument, related drafts or earlier versions, correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent, and witness declarations from individuals with firsthand knowledge of the settlor’s wishes. Financial records or contemporaneous notes that demonstrate the settlor’s planning goals can also be relevant. The strength of a reformation claim depends on how convincingly the evidence shows that a drafting mistake caused the written terms to diverge from the settlor’s true intent. Collecting and organizing this evidence carefully is important for presenting a persuasive case to the court. Clear, consistent documentation and credible witness statements increase the likelihood that the court will permit the requested correction or interpretation. We assist clients in identifying and compiling the most relevant materials to support a reformation petition.
Costs vary based on the complexity of the facts, whether the petition is contested, and the amount of preparation and court time required. Uncontested matters with clear documentation can be resolved with less expense, while contested petitions involving hearings, discovery, or extensive briefing will generally cost more. Additional fees may include court filing fees, service costs, and potential charges for obtaining records or expert input when necessary. We discuss anticipated costs upfront and work to keep representation focused and efficient. Budgeting for a petition involves weighing the expected benefits of a court order against potential expenses. In many cases, the long-term value of achieving a legally binding modification that prevents future disputes outweighs the near-term cost. We provide transparent billing practices and regular updates so clients can make informed decisions about proceeding.
If beneficiaries object to the proposed modification, the court will consider their arguments along with the petitioner’s evidence before making a determination. Objections may raise factual disputes, questions about notice, or concerns that the modification harms beneficiaries’ rights. The court may schedule additional hearings, allow discovery, or request further documentation to resolve contested issues. Effective representation focuses on narrowing disputes and presenting clear evidence of the settlor’s intent and the necessity of the requested change. In many cases, objections can be addressed through negotiation or clarification of the proposed order to accommodate legitimate concerns while preserving the core modification. When that is not possible, the court’s role is to weigh competing positions and issue a binding decision that balances the settlor’s intent and beneficiaries’ protections.
Trust modifications can sometimes affect creditor claims or have tax implications depending on the nature of the change and the timing. Certain modifications may be subject to claims by creditors or may alter tax treatment of trust assets. It is important to consider these potential consequences and consult on how the proposed change could affect creditor rights, taxation, or beneficiary entitlements. Addressing ancillary issues proactively helps avoid unintended negative consequences after the modification is implemented. We coordinate with financial and tax advisors when necessary to evaluate potential fallout from a proposed modification and recommend approaches that mitigate risk. Considering creditor and tax issues early in the process helps shape a strategy that protects the trust’s long-term objectives and reduces the risk of adverse outcomes.
Yes. Many trust disputes are resolved through negotiation, mediation, or settlement without a contested hearing. Alternative dispute resolution can be an efficient and less adversarial way to resolve disagreements while preserving family relationships. Mediation allows parties to discuss the issues with a neutral mediator and often leads to mutually agreeable solutions. When parties reach an agreement, the terms can be memorialized and submitted to the court for approval if a binding modification is needed. Choosing a cooperative approach depends on the willingness of interested parties to engage and the nature of the issues involved. When cooperation is not possible, the court process remains available to provide a definitive resolution. We evaluate options and advise clients on when alternative resolution makes sense versus when formal court action is necessary.
To begin, gather the trust instrument, related amendments, wills, beneficiary designations, and any documents or correspondence that shed light on the settlor’s intent. Contact our office to schedule an initial consultation to review these materials and discuss the circumstances that prompt a modification. During the consultation we assess whether petitioning the court is appropriate and outline the likely steps, necessary evidence, and estimated timeline for resolving the matter. Early preparation makes the process more efficient and informed. If you decide to proceed, we will help identify interested parties who must be notified, collect supporting evidence, draft the petition, and manage filing and service procedures. We will keep you informed throughout the process and represent your interests at hearings when required, guiding implementation after any court order is entered.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas