If you are dealing with property that was intended to be part of a trust but was never formally transferred, a Heggstad petition may be the right legal step to secure those assets. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we assist clients in Fort Dick and throughout Del Norte County with court petitions to clarify trust ownership and ensure assets are handled according to the settlor’s intentions. A Heggstad petition asks the court to treat the property as if it had been transferred to the trust, which can resolve disputes and prevent probate when supported by evidence of intent and proper trust documentation.
Beginning a Heggstad petition process requires careful review of the trust documents, title records, and any evidence showing the settlor intended the asset to belong to the trust. Our firm helps clients gather declarations, affidavits, and historical records that demonstrate the transfer intent. Whether the issue arises from oversight, clerical error, or ambiguous paperwork, pursuing a petition can protect beneficiaries and preserve the trust plan. We provide clear explanations of potential outcomes, procedural timelines, and likely evidentiary needs so you can make informed decisions that align with the settlor’s plan and local court practices.
A Heggstad petition can prevent unnecessary probate, reduce family conflict, and confirm that assets are distributed according to the trust document. When title to real property or other assets remains in the settlor’s name despite clear intent to fund a trust, petitioning the court creates a formal record recognizing the trust’s ownership. This helps beneficiaries receive assets without delay and keeps the settlor’s estate plan intact. The process also provides legal certainty for financial institutions and title companies, making future transactions smoother and reducing the risk of future challenges to the trust administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman support clients with practical estate planning and trust administration services tailored to California law. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful document review, and methodical preparation of filings and declarations that courts expect in Heggstad matters. We work with trustees, beneficiaries, and family members to gather background information, interview witnesses, and compile evidence showing intent to transfer assets into the trust. Our goal is to resolve title issues efficiently while minimizing expense and stress for families navigating the court process in Del Norte County and beyond.
A Heggstad petition is a legal tool used to establish that certain property should be treated as trust property even though the formal transfer was not completed. The petition typically requires demonstrating through documents and witness statements that the settlor intended the asset to be owned by the trust. Relevant evidence may include terms in the trust, transfer instruments, correspondence, beneficiary designations, or actions taken by the settlor indicating an intent to fund the trust. Courts consider the totality of the evidence when deciding whether to enter an order recognizing the trust’s ownership.
Filing a Heggstad petition involves preparing a petition, supporting declarations, and a proposed order for the court. Parties must follow local rules for filing and service and be prepared to address potential objections from interested persons. The court may require testimony, additional documentation, or a hearing to weigh competing claims. Successful petitions can eliminate the need for probate for the particular asset, clarify trustee powers, and streamline trust administration. Taking a methodical approach to evidence collection and legal argumentation increases the chances of a favorable ruling.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that certain property is effectively part of a trust despite the absence of a formal title transfer. The petition explains why the settlor intended the asset to be owned by the trust and provides evidence supporting that intention. Courts evaluate written trust provisions, contemporaneous documents, and the behavior of the settlor to determine whether recognition of trust ownership is appropriate. The practical effect of a successful petition is to place the asset under the trustee’s control, subject to the trust terms, and to avoid the delays and costs of probate for that asset.
When preparing and litigating a Heggstad petition, it is important to assemble clear evidence of the settlor’s intent, such as trust language, transfer documents, beneficiary designations, and witness affidavits. Courts will want to see a coherent narrative linking the asset to the trust plan. Title documentation, escrow records, and contemporaneous communications can be persuasive. The process also requires compliance with procedural requirements, including proper service of the petition, notice to interested parties, and adherence to local court practices. Thorough preparation improves the likelihood of a favorable judicial declaration.
Understanding common terms used in Heggstad matters helps trustees and beneficiaries navigate the process. Words such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, petition, title, and declaration appear frequently in pleadings and supporting materials. Knowing what courts expect in terms of documentation and proof can make evidence collection more efficient and reduce surprises during litigation. Clear definitions also help family members and interested parties understand the stakes and ensure that communications and filings address the right legal standards and factual issues in the dispute.
The settlor is the person who creates the trust and sets its terms, including how assets should be managed and distributed. In Heggstad petition matters, the settlor’s expressed intentions are central; courts look to the settlor’s actions, written documents, and statements to determine whether an asset was intended to become trust property. Evidence showing the settlor intended the trust to own the asset can come from drafts, funding instructions, communications with advisors, or consistent behavior indicating that the asset was meant to be part of the trust estate.
A petition is the formal request submitted to the probate court asking for an order recognizing trust ownership of specific property. In a Heggstad petition, the pleading sets out the facts, legal basis, and relief sought, and is accompanied by supporting declarations and exhibits. The petition must identify interested persons, explain why probate is not necessary for the asset, and provide evidence that the settlor intended the transfer to the trust. The court reviews the petition, considers responses, and may hold a hearing before ruling.
The trustee is the person or entity charged with managing trust assets according to the trust document for the benefit of beneficiaries. In Heggstad matters, the trustee often brings the petition or defends the trust’s claim to the asset, presenting evidence that the settlor intended the asset to be administered under the trust. The trustee has fiduciary duties to act in the beneficiaries’ best interests and must handle the petition process transparently, providing notice and clear documentation to avoid disputes.
Title refers to the legal ownership of property as recorded in public records. A Heggstad petition often seeks to reconcile discrepancies between recorded title and the trust’s intended ownership by asking the court to treat the asset as trust property. Supporting evidence can include deeds, escrow papers, account statements, and recorded documents that, when viewed with the trust instrument and other proofs, demonstrate the settlor’s intent to fund the trust despite a technical omission in title records.
When an asset intended for a trust remains in the settlor’s name, options include initiating a Heggstad petition, completing a corrective transfer if possible, or pursuing probate if the circumstances require. A corrective transfer may be straightforward when all parties agree and proper documentation is available, but disagreements or missing records may necessitate a petition. Probate can be more time consuming and costly and may not reflect the settlor’s trust plan. Evaluating the facts, costs, and likely outcomes helps determine the most appropriate path for each asset and family situation.
A targeted corrective approach may be sufficient when title issues arise due to a clerical oversight and all interested parties agree on the settlor’s intent. If deeds, beneficiary designations, escrow instructions, or other records clearly indicate the trust funding plan and everyone who has a legal interest in the property concurs, it may be possible to complete a straightforward transfer to the trust without court intervention. This path can reduce time and expense while achieving the settlor’s objectives, provided that the required documents are in order and all necessary consents are obtained.
Sometimes title remains outside the trust because of minor technical errors, such as an incomplete signature or an outdated form. When those errors can be corrected by executing a corrective deed, signing missing paperwork, or obtaining a simple affidavit, a limited approach can resolve the issue quickly. This option is often preferable when there is no dispute among potential heirs or beneficiaries and when the settlor’s intent is well documented in the trust instrument and related records, allowing a clean and cost-effective resolution of the funding omission.
Comprehensive legal action, including filing a Heggstad petition, is often necessary when ownership of an asset is contested or when records are unclear and parties disagree about the settlor’s intent. In these situations, litigation may be the most reliable method to obtain a definitive ruling that binds all interested parties. Preparing a thorough petition and supporting evidence requires careful legal analysis and factual development to explain why the asset should be treated as trust property. The court’s determination provides clarity and prevents future disputes over the same asset.
When essential documentation is missing or ambiguous, a comprehensive legal strategy is needed to assemble alternative evidence and present a persuasive factual record to the court. This may include securing witness declarations, historical records, or expert testimony about customary practices and communications that reflect the settlor’s intentions. The goal is to create a believable narrative showing that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust despite gaps in formal paperwork. Courts are open to such evidence when it reliably demonstrates the settlor’s intent.
Pursuing a formal declaration through a Heggstad petition provides legal clarity that helps trustees manage assets without lingering title doubts. A court order recognizing trust ownership minimizes the risk of future litigation, enables trustees to exercise their powers confidently, and supports clean transfers and sales by clarifying who has authority. This path also reassures beneficiaries that the settlor’s plan will be honored and provides a public record reflecting the asset’s status within the trust, which can be essential for dealing with banks, title companies, and successors.
Another advantage of a comprehensive approach is that it can resolve multiple related issues at once, such as confirming trustee authority, addressing beneficiary disputes, and clarifying distribution questions. Consolidating claims into a single proceeding reduces the chance of inconsistent rulings and can be more efficient than piecemeal litigation over time. A well-prepared petition anticipates common defenses and addresses them proactively, enabling the court to reach a durable resolution that serves the interests of the trust and its beneficiaries.
Securing a court order through a Heggstad petition lowers the likelihood of future litigation by producing a binding judicial determination on title issues. When courts recognize the trust’s ownership, later claims against the property are less likely to succeed, and trustees can proceed with administration tasks like selling assets or distributing proceeds with greater assurance. This protective effect preserves estate planning goals and offers beneficiaries a clearer path for receiving their interests according to the trust’s terms rather than risking disputes that could delay or alter distributions.
A court declaration provides third parties such as banks, title companies, and buyers with clear legal backing to recognize trustee authority and proceed with transactions. This reduces administrative friction and costly delays when dealing with estate matters. Trustees benefit from unambiguous court guidance on how to handle the asset, including whether to sell, hold, or distribute it, which helps avoid disputes and mistaken actions. Clear direction from the court streamlines trust administration and protects trustees from claims of improper handling.
Begin by locating the trust document, any deeds, escrow records, beneficiary designations, and correspondence related to the asset. Consistent documentary evidence is the strongest foundation for a Heggstad petition. Collecting contemporaneous records that show the settlor’s intent helps create a persuasive narrative for the court. If written documents are sparse, identify witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s statements and actions regarding the asset. Organizing this material early speeds review and allows for a more strategic presentation of the facts in court filings.
Each county court may have specific filing protocols, required forms, and hearing procedures that affect the timing and content of a Heggstad petition. Familiarize yourself with Del Norte County probate rules and any local practices that judges expect. Preparing filings that comply with local formatting and procedural standards reduces the likelihood of delays and ensures the petition is heard promptly. Being proactive about scheduling, exhibit preparation, and witness availability also helps avoid adjournments and supports a more efficient resolution for the parties involved.
If property was intended to fund a trust but remains titled in the settlor’s name, pursuing a Heggstad petition can align legal ownership with the settlor’s plan without resorting to full probate administration. The petition addresses issues that arise from oversight, ambiguous transfers, or incomplete title work and helps ensure beneficiaries receive the intended assets. This service is particularly valuable when the asset is significant, when clear records are limited, or when clouded title could complicate future transactions such as sales, refinancing, or distribution under the trust terms.
Another reason to consider this service is to reduce family conflict by obtaining a court determination that settles competing claims and prevents future disputes. A judicial order recognizing the trust’s ownership provides finality and makes it less likely that parties will revisit the matter later. The process can also clarify trustees’ powers, allowing smoother management and disposition of the asset in accordance with the trust document. For families who value certainty and orderly administration, a Heggstad petition offers a reliable pathway to confirm the settlor’s intentions.
Typical circumstances include forgotten transfers during estate planning, deeds mistakenly left in the settlor’s name, beneficiary designations that conflict with trust terms, and assets acquired after a trust was created but never retitled. Other triggers include disputes among heirs about whether an asset was meant to be in the trust, or complications identified during a property sale or refinance when title issues surface. Recognizing these patterns early allows trustees and beneficiaries to act promptly to preserve the trust plan and avoid unnecessary probate costs.
A common issue arises when a home or parcel of land that the settlor intended to fund into the trust remains in the settlor’s name because the deed was never executed or recorded correctly. This creates a discrepancy between the trust document and public records, potentially exposing the asset to probate or creditor claims. Filing a Heggstad petition can resolve the conflict by asking the court to recognize the trust’s ownership based on the settlor’s intent, supported by documentation and witness testimony that shows the asset was meant to be part of the trust.
Assets such as retirement accounts or life insurance may have beneficiary designations that do not match the trust’s distribution plan, leading to questions about whether funds should pass through the trust. When a settlor intended to coordinate beneficiary designations with trust funding but the records do not reflect that plan, a court petition or coordinated corrective action may be necessary to reconcile the different documents. Gathering account statements, beneficiary forms, and communications with plan administrators helps build the case for treating the asset in accordance with the trust.
Sometimes a settlor acquires new assets after creating a trust but does not retitle those assets into the trust. When the settlor clearly intended the trust to govern such assets, a Heggstad petition can confirm that intent and place the asset under trustee control. Evidence such as trust amendments, letters of instruction, or contemporaneous correspondence indicating funding intent can be persuasive. Addressing these omissions sooner rather than later helps preserve the integrity of the estate plan and reduces complications at the time of administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers assistance to residents of Fort Dick and nearby communities who face trust funding disputes or title discrepancies. We guide clients through evidence gathering, petition drafting, and court presentation, explaining the practical implications of each option and the likely timelines involved. Our goal is to provide clear, responsive representation to help trustees and beneficiaries resolve ownership questions and move forward with trust administration in a way that honors the settlor’s intentions and follows California probate practice.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for careful, client-focused handling of trust and probate issues. We take time to review trust instruments and related records thoroughly and to explain legal options in plain language. Our process emphasizes preparing well-documented petitions and declarations that address common judicial concerns, aiming to resolve disputes efficiently while protecting beneficiaries’ interests. We also maintain clear communication from intake through resolution so clients understand what to expect at each stage of the Heggstad petition process.
Our firm assists with coordinating necessary records, interviewing witnesses, and assembling the factual narrative that supports a petition. We prepare filings and proposed orders tailored to local court practices and advocate for solutions that reduce cost and delay when possible. Working closely with trustees and family members, we aim to minimize conflict and keep the focus on achieving a durable outcome that reflects the settlor’s plan. We also advise on alternatives where a nonlitigious correction is feasible, ensuring clients pursue the most appropriate route for their circumstances.
When litigation is required, we prepare the case comprehensively, anticipating potential defenses and presenting evidence in a manner consistent with probate court expectations. For uncontested matters, we pursue streamlined resolutions that clear title and allow trustees to manage or distribute assets promptly. Throughout the process, we keep clients informed of procedural steps and likely timelines, and we help coordinate with title companies, financial institutions, and other professionals to implement the court’s order once granted, ensuring practical follow-through after the judicial determination.
Our process begins with a careful intake and document review to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate or whether corrective transfer steps can resolve the matter. We prioritize gathering all relevant evidence and preparing a concise petition with supporting declarations and exhibits. After filing, we manage service and communication with interested parties, respond to any objections, and present the matter to the court, seeking an order that clarifies ownership. We also assist with recording any required documents and coordinating with title companies to implement the court’s decree.
The first step is a thorough evaluation of the trust instrument, deed records, account statements, and any written communications that reflect the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. We work with the client to identify potential witnesses and collect historical records that may support the petition. This phase includes identifying interested parties who must be given notice and assessing whether a nonjudicial correction is viable. A clear understanding of the factual landscape allows us to determine the best procedural approach and to estimate likely timelines and costs.
Careful review of trust language and title documents reveals whether the asset was intended to belong to the trust and what paperwork is missing or inconsistent. We examine deeds, escrow records, beneficiary forms, and related documents, noting discrepancies and gathering items that corroborate intent. This analysis informs the content of the petition and the selection of supporting exhibits. Clear documentation of these findings is essential to present a persuasive case to the probate court and to anticipate potential responses from interested parties.
Identifying witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s statements or actions is an important step when documentary evidence is limited. We help clients locate and prepare witness declarations and corroborating records to create a coherent narrative for the court. Gathering corroborative evidence, such as communications with advisors or escrow officers, strengthens the petition. Preparing these materials carefully and organizing them into a logical evidentiary package improves the clarity and persuasiveness of the filing submitted to the court.
With evidence in hand, we draft a petition that explains the legal basis for recognizing the asset as trust property, attaches supporting declarations, and proposes an order for the court to enter. The filing includes proper notice to interested persons and conforms to local probate rules. Clear, well-organized exhibits and a persuasive factual presentation increase the likelihood of prompt judicial consideration. Following filing, we monitor the case, coordinate service, and prepare to address any objections or requests for additional documentation from the court or opposing parties.
Supporting declarations and exhibits should clearly link the asset to the settlor’s trust plan, showing how actions and documents reflect an intent to fund the trust. We prepare declarations from trustees, witnesses, and professionals familiar with the transaction, and we compile documentary exhibits such as deeds, escrow statements, and correspondence. Organizing these materials logically and labeling exhibits properly for the court makes a petition more accessible to judges and opposing parties and supports a more efficient review process.
After preparing the petition package, we file it with the appropriate probate division and ensure that all interested persons receive proper notice according to California rules. Compliance with service requirements and local filing procedures reduces the chance of procedural delays. We also track court schedules and respond to any inquiries or informal requests for clarification. Timely, accurate filing and service practices set the stage for the court to review the matter on its merits and to provide a judicial resolution without procedural complications.
If the court requires a hearing, we present the petition and supporting evidence, address any objections, and advocate for an order recognizing the trust’s ownership. The hearing may include witness testimony and argument based on the assembled record. If the petition is uncontested and supported by strong documentary proof, the court may grant the requested order without extended litigation. Once an order is entered, we assist with recording the order and any title documents needed to reflect the trust’s ownership in public records.
At hearing, clarity and organization matter: witnesses and exhibits should be prepared to demonstrate the settlor’s intent and the factual basis for treating the asset as trust property. We focus on presenting a coherent narrative supported by documents and testimony to answer any questions the court or opposing parties may raise. Anticipating common objections and addressing them through declarations and legal authority helps the court reach a durable decision that aligns with the trust’s terms and the settlor’s intentions.
After the court issues its ruling, we guide clients through implementing the order by recording documents or coordinating with title companies and financial institutions to update ownership records. This administrative follow-through ensures the court’s decision has practical effect and that trustees can manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s directions. Completing these steps promptly avoids lingering encumbrances on the asset and secures the finality that beneficiaries and trustees seek when resolving trust funding discrepancies.
A Heggstad petition is a request to the probate court to recognize that particular property should be treated as trust property even though it was never formally retitled into the trust. It is typically used when a settlor’s intent to fund the trust is evident from documents or actions but the public record does not reflect the transfer. The petition presents evidence such as the trust document, deeds, correspondence, and witness declarations to explain why the court should enter an order declaring the asset part of the trust. The remedy is focused on the specific asset rather than full probate administration. When a Heggstad petition is appropriate, it can provide clarity without administering the settlor’s entire estate through probate. The court evaluates the totality of evidence to determine whether recognition of trust ownership is warranted. If granted, the order allows the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms, reducing the need for probate for that particular property. The process helps protect the settlor’s intent and provides a public record confirming the trust’s ownership for third parties.
The time required for a Heggstad petition varies based on the complexity of the facts, the availability of evidence, and whether the petition is contested. For uncontested matters with clear documentation and cooperative parties, the process can move more quickly, subject to local court schedules and filing procedures. When disputes arise or additional discovery and witness preparation are needed, the matter can take longer as the court evaluates competing claims and evidence. Local probate calendars and procedural requirements also influence the overall timeline. Practical steps such as prompt evidence collection, early notice to interested parties, and thorough preparation of declarations and exhibits help expedite review. Being organized and responsive to court requests reduces the likelihood of adjournments. While exact timing cannot be guaranteed, early planning and a focused evidentiary strategy create the best conditions for a timely judicial resolution that clarifies ownership and allows trustees to proceed with administration.
The most persuasive evidence in a Heggstad matter is documentation and testimony that directly link the asset to the settlor’s trust plan. This may include the trust instrument, deeds, escrow instructions, account statements, correspondence with attorneys or advisors, and contemporaneous notes indicating the intent to fund the trust. Witness declarations from those present when the settlor discussed the asset or directed funding can supplement documentary records. The clearer and more consistent the record, the stronger the petition’s presentation to the court. When primary documents are missing, secondary evidence like consistent conduct, payments from trust accounts, or corroborating statements from professionals can bridge gaps. Courts weigh all admissible evidence together, so organizing records into a coherent narrative that aligns with the trust terms is essential. Demonstrating that the settlor intended the trust to own the asset, even if formal steps were omitted, is the core of a persuasive Heggstad petition.
Yes. When a Heggstad petition is successful, the court can recognize that the particular asset belongs to the trust, which can avoid probate for that asset specifically. The petition focuses on correcting the record for the disputed property so that the trustee can exercise authority under the trust without needing probate administration for that item. This approach preserves the settlor’s plan for the asset and reduces the delay and expense that full probate could entail for the same property. It is important to understand that a single Heggstad petition addresses the asset in question rather than all of the settlor’s estate. If other assets also have funding issues, additional petitions or corrective transfers may be necessary. Nevertheless, obtaining a judicial determination for a significant asset can substantially simplify overall administration and reduce the risk of future challenges regarding that property.
Interested persons typically include beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs at law, trustees, and anyone else with a potential legal interest in the asset or the settlor’s estate. California probate rules require proper notice to these parties so they have an opportunity to respond or object to the petition. Identifying and serving all interested persons is an important procedural requirement; failure to provide appropriate notice can create grounds for delay or challenge and may require re-filing or additional steps to secure a valid order. During case intake, we identify who must be notified and help ensure service is completed according to local rules. Clear communication with interested parties may lead to resolution without contested litigation if all parties agree. When disputes arise, proper notice preserves rights and allows the court to adjudicate competing claims fairly, ensuring that any order entered is binding on those who received appropriate notice.
Alternatives include completing corrective transfers outside of court if all parties agree and the required documentation can be assembled. Executing a corrective deed, updating beneficiary designations, or obtaining written consents from interested persons can resolve many funding issues without a petition. These approaches are often quicker and less expensive, but they require cooperation among those with legal interests and clear evidence of the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. When parties cannot agree or when documentation is lacking, a court petition may be the most reliable path to a binding resolution. Mediation or negotiation sometimes helps bridge disagreements and avoid contested hearings. Evaluating the facts early and discussing the feasibility of nonjudicial correction versus litigation helps determine the most practical course of action for each situation.
A Heggstad order itself does not automatically amend public deed records, but it provides the legal basis for recording documents that reflect the court’s determination. After obtaining an order recognizing trust ownership, the trustee can record the order and any corrective deeds or documents required to update title records. This follow-through ensures that public records align with the judicial declaration and that third parties will see consistent evidence of the trust’s ownership when reviewing title. Coordinating with title companies and county recorders after the order is entered helps implement the court’s decision in practice. Title companies often require a certified copy of the order and properly executed transfer documents to clear title issues. Acting promptly to record the necessary instruments ensures the ruling has its intended effect on public records and future transactions.
Costs vary depending on document preparation, court filing fees, the complexity of evidence gathering, and whether the matter is contested. Uncontested petitions with clear documentation and cooperative parties will typically require less time and lower fees, while contested matters that involve witness preparation, discovery, or hearings will incur higher costs. Additional expenses may include fees for obtaining certified records, deposition costs, or costs associated with recording documents after a court order is obtained. Evaluating costs early in the process and discussing alternatives like corrective deeds or negotiated resolutions can help manage expense. We work with clients to outline expected steps and reasonable fee estimates for their situation, and we prioritize efficient preparation and strong evidence to avoid unnecessary litigation costs wherever possible.
Disputes over Heggstad petitions can lead to extended litigation when parties contest the settlor’s intent, produce conflicting evidence, or seek broader relief beyond recognition of a specific asset. When adversarial positions are entrenched, discovery and multiple hearings may be necessary, which prolongs the process. Courts may also require additional testimony or documentation to resolve material factual disputes, further extending the timeline and increasing costs for all parties involved. However, many matters are resolved through careful preparation, negotiations, or focused hearings limited to the question of trust ownership. Early evidence gathering, open communication with interested parties, and well-drafted petitions reduce the chance of drawn-out litigation. When disputes arise, alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation may help reach agreement without prolonged court battles.
If you suspect an asset should have been funded to a trust, start by gathering all relevant documents such as the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence that indicates intent. Review beneficiary designations and contact escrow or title professionals who handled past transactions. Early collection of records and a clear timeline of events are essential to determine whether a simple corrective transfer is possible or whether a Heggstad petition is required to resolve ambiguous title issues. Next, notify the trustee and other interested persons and seek legal guidance to evaluate the best path forward. An attorney familiar with trust funding issues can advise on procedural requirements, evidence needed for a petition, and alternatives that may resolve the matter without court involvement. Acting promptly helps preserve evidence and reduces the chance of complications arising from delayed action.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas