If you are considering changes to a trust in Cameron Park, a trust modification petition can be the appropriate legal tool to address altered circumstances, changed intentions, or errors in the original document. Our team at the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman helps clients assess whether a petition to modify a trust is the right path under California law. We evaluate the trust terms, the reasons for modification, and the likely outcomes, then outline options to pursue modifications through agreement among beneficiaries or through court petition when necessary.
A trust modification petition may be sought for many reasons such as correcting drafting mistakes, adapting to new financial realities, or reflecting changed family relationships. California law allows for nonjudicial and judicial modifications depending on the terms of the trust and whether all interested parties agree. In situations where beneficiaries cannot reach an agreement, a petition to the court can provide a resolution. We focus on clear communication and practical solutions to help clients in Cameron Park protect their intentions and preserve family harmony when modifying trust arrangements.
A trust modification petition provides a formal path to align a trust with current circumstances, prevent future disputes, and clarify trustee duties and beneficiary rights. By addressing mistakes or ambiguities, the process reduces the risk of costly litigation later and helps ensure the trust operates as intended. For trustees and beneficiaries alike, pursuing a modification can preserve estate assets and reduce uncertainty. Careful planning through a modification petition can also update tax, retirement, and asset distribution provisions to reflect changes in laws or family needs, delivering long-term peace of mind.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California with a focus on thoughtful estate planning and trust administration. Located in San Jose and serving Cameron Park, we bring years of practical experience helping individuals and families update trust documents, prepare petitions, and navigate court procedures when changes are required. Our approach emphasizes clear explanations, responsive communication, and tailored strategies that reflect each client s objectives and family dynamics. We assist with drafting amendments, drafting petitions, and negotiating resolutions that minimize conflict and preserve assets for intended beneficiaries.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to change the terms of an existing trust when circumstances warrant alteration and when the trust document itself does not provide a straightforward mechanism for amendment. In California, modifications can be achieved nonjudicially when all interested parties consent, or judicially through the court if consent is lacking or if the modification is sought to correct ambiguities or address mistakes. The petition must explain the reasons for change and show why the proposed modification is consistent with the settlor s intent and the interests of beneficiaries.
Careful evaluation precedes any petition to modify a trust. Key considerations include the trust documents, the settlor s current capacity and intent, the identities and rights of beneficiaries, and potential tax consequences. We examine whether the trust contains no-contest clauses, spendthrift provisions, or language restricting modification, and assess whether other dispute resolution options are feasible. The objective is to pursue a modification that is legally defensible and practically effective, while minimizing conflict and cost for all parties involved.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing that asks a court to approve changes to the terms of a trust when parties cannot accomplish the change voluntarily or when the modification addresses an issue that cannot be resolved informally. Reasons to file include correcting drafting errors, removing or appointing trustees, adjusting distribution terms, or reconciling the trust with new legal or financial realities. The petition must provide factual support and legal grounds showing the modification will reflect the settlor s intent or serve the beneficiaries best interests under current circumstances.
The process for a court-ordered trust modification begins with drafting a petition that sets out the trust provisions to be changed, the basis for the requested change, and the identities and interests of affected beneficiaries. The court will review the settlor s intent, any evidence of mistake or ambiguity, the consent of beneficiaries where available, and the proposed changes impact on rights and obligations. Notice and an opportunity to respond are provided to interested parties. If the court finds the modification appropriate, it issues an order that amends the trust accordingly, which then guides administration going forward.
Understanding common terms helps when considering a trust modification petition. Terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, conservatee, and revocation refer to parties or actions related to trust management. Knowing the difference between a nonjudicial modification and a court-ordered modification clarifies procedural options. Other important concepts include no-contest clauses, pour-over wills, and Heggstad petitions, each of which can affect whether a modification is advisable and how the court may evaluate proposed changes. Clear definitions reduce confusion and support informed decision making.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and originally funded it with assets. The settlor s intent, as expressed in the trust document and surrounding circumstances, is a primary consideration when courts evaluate proposed modifications. If the settlor is alive and has capacity, their direction may be sufficient to authorize changes. When the settlor is unavailable or lacks capacity, petitions must rely on other grounds such as mistakes in the drafting or changed circumstances that justify a court s intervention to align the trust with the settlor s probable intent.
A no-contest clause is a provision intended to discourage beneficiaries from challenging the trust by threatening forfeiture or other penalties for unsuccessful contests. Such clauses can influence strategy in seeking a trust modification, because courts sometimes consider whether a proposed challenge is reasonable or made in good faith. Even with a no-contest clause, certain permitted actions or disagreements may not trigger penalties, and courts may still allow modifications to correct clear mistakes or to resolve ambiguities that protect the settlor s original intent and the interests of all beneficiaries.
The trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing the trust assets according to the trust document and applicable law. Trustees have fiduciary duties that include acting in the beneficiaries best interest and following the settlor s instructions. When seeking a trust modification, the trustee may play a central role by supporting a petition, providing relevant documents, and implementing changes ordered by the court. Disputes between trustees and beneficiaries over proposed modifications can lead to formal petitions when informal resolution is not possible.
A Heggstad petition is a specific legal action used to transfer assets into a trust when assets that should have been included were never properly titled or transferred. It allows the court to recognize that certain assets are intended to be trust property despite paperwork errors. This remedy can be related to trust modification matters when the scope of the trust s assets is at issue or when corrections are necessary to effect the settlor s original plan. Successful Heggstad petitions help preserve intended distributions and minimize estate complications.
When considering trust modifications, clients weigh less adversarial nonjudicial approaches against formal court petitions. Nonjudicial changes work well when all beneficiaries agree and the trust includes language permitting amendment by consent. This path is typically faster and less costly. By contrast, court petitions are necessary when agreement cannot be reached or when legal correction is needed due to ambiguity or mistake. Although court involvement can be more time consuming, it provides a binding resolution and may be the only route to enforce a fair outcome and maintain trust administration consistent with the settlor s intent.
A limited, nonjudicial approach suits situations in which all beneficiaries and the trustee agree on the proposed changes and the trust authorizes amendment by consent. When parties can negotiate and reach a consensus, amendments can often be drafted and executed quickly without court involvement. This path reduces legal expenses and preserves family relationships by avoiding contested proceedings. It is important, however, to document consent carefully and ensure any agreement meets legal requirements so that future challenges are minimized and the trust remains effective for administration.
Minor changes such as correcting a name, updating contact details, or adjusting administrative procedures can generally be handled through agreed amendments rather than court petitions. When the modification simply improves clarity without altering substantive distribution rights, parties often prefer a streamlined amendment process. These updates should be carefully documented and signed by the necessary parties to ensure they are legally recognized. Properly executed nonjudicial amendments keep the trust operational and avoid the delays and costs associated with filing a petition in court.
Comprehensive legal assistance is appropriate when disagreements among beneficiaries or between trustees and beneficiaries prevent informal resolution of important trust issues. In such cases, a petition to modify the trust may be required to resolve contested interpretations, correct errors, or reassign trustee responsibilities. Full legal support ensures thorough preparation of the petition, proper notice to interested parties, and effective presentation of the factual and legal basis for modification. This approach aims to secure a durable court order that clarifies rights and obligations and permits the trust to be administered without ongoing dispute.
When there are major changes in family dynamics, financial situations, or governing law, pursuing a comprehensive legal strategy may be necessary to adapt a trust appropriately. Such scenarios include divorce, incapacity, unexpected tax considerations, or newly discovered assets that affect trust administration. A court petition may be the most reliable means to update trust terms while protecting the interests of all involved. Comprehensive representation helps anticipate potential challenges and craft a modification that withstands scrutiny and aligns with the settlor s probable intent.
A comprehensive approach to trust modification combines careful document review, clear legal arguments, and proactive communication with all interested parties to achieve stable, enforceable changes. By thoroughly documenting the basis for the requested modification and addressing foreseeable objections, this strategy reduces the risk of future litigation and preserves the settlor s overall plan. It also ensures compliance with statutory requirements and court procedure, which helps protect trustees and beneficiaries from unintended consequences and facilitates smooth administration after modification.
Another benefit of a comprehensive approach is the ability to consider related estate planning items in tandem with the modification, such as checking pour-over wills, powers of attorney, or health care directives for consistency. Coordinating these documents avoids conflicting instructions and ensures that the settlor s overall estate plan remains coherent. Taking a big-picture view helps prevent oversight and supports long-term objectives, whether the change concerns asset allocation, trustee succession, or clarifying beneficiary interests under evolving circumstances.
When a trust modification is pursued with a full legal review and careful preparation, the resulting order or amendment is less likely to be successfully challenged. Thorough documentation of the settlor s intent, clear explanation of mistakes or changed circumstances, and proper notice to interested parties create a strong record that courts rely on when issuing decisions. This reduces the future risk of litigation and supports a smoother administration of the trust, preserving assets for beneficiaries and allowing trustees to act with confidence under clarified terms.
A comprehensive modification process ensures that trust changes are aligned with other estate planning components such as wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives. Reviewing these documents together prevents contradictions and ensures assets flow as intended upon incapacity or death. This coordinated approach supports continuity of planning and limits administrative friction. Updating related documents at the same time also provides an opportunity to address additional concerns, such as retirement plan designations or beneficiary updates, so the entire estate plan functions cohesively.
Before pursuing a trust modification petition, collect all relevant documents, including the original trust, any amendments, related wills, account statements, property deeds, and beneficiary designations. Having a complete record helps clarify what changes are needed and establishes the context for the requested modification. Documentation of transactions, communications with the trustee, and any evidence of the settlor s intent will support the petition and reduce delays. Well organized records also streamline communications with other parties and the court, which can save time and expense during the process.
When modifying a trust, review related estate planning documents and accounts to ensure consistency across your overall plan. Updates to beneficiary designations, powers of attorney, health care directives, or retirement plan documents may be necessary to reflect trust changes. Coordinating these elements reduces the risk of conflicting instructions and unanticipated asset distributions. Thinking holistically supports a seamless transition of management and ownership when incapacity or death occurs, and it helps preserve the settlor s intentions throughout the estate administration process.
People pursue trust modification petitions for a variety of important reasons, including correcting mistakes in the original document, addressing changed family circumstances, updating trustee appointments, or clarifying ambiguous terms that lead to conflict. When the trust no longer reflects the settlor s wishes or when administration under existing provisions would be impractical or unfair, a petition can provide a legal remedy. The process helps align the trust with current realities so assets are distributed and managed according to a plan that reflects present needs and intentions.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to resolve disputes that impede effective administration. Conflicting interpretations of trust language or disagreements over trustee conduct can delay distributions and create friction among beneficiaries. A court-approved modification or clarification can produce a binding resolution that restores orderly management of trust assets. Additionally, petitions may be necessary to incorporate newly discovered assets or to reconcile the trust with changes in tax law, ensuring that long-term financial impacts are addressed within a legally enforceable framework.
Typical circumstances prompting trust modification petitions include incorrect or omitted assets, ambiguous beneficiary descriptions, changes in family structure such as divorce or birth, removal or replacement of trustees, and the need to address unforeseen tax or financial issues. When documents fail to account for new assets or when the settlor s intentions are unclear, disagreements can arise that impede administration. A petition can correct errors, allocate assets as intended, or update trustee powers to reflect current needs, helping the trust function as intended going forward.
Drafting errors and omissions are common causes for trust modification petitions, as misdated provisions, missing assets, or unclear beneficiary descriptions can frustrate the settlor s intent. When paperwork fails to transfer property to the trust or when ambiguous language creates disputes, a petition can clarify ownership and distribution plans. Correcting these matters through the court provides a definitive resolution that supports consistent administration and helps prevent future contests or unintended distributions that would undermine the settlor s goals.
Life events such as marriage, divorce, births, deaths, or significant changes in financial circumstances often require updates to trust arrangements. If the original trust no longer reflects the settlor s values or practical needs, a modification petition may be necessary to realign distributions, update trustee appointments, or adjust terms for beneficiaries. Addressing these changes through a legal process ensures the trust remains workable and fair, and it helps preserve assets and relationships by providing an orderly mechanism for implementing the settlor s revised intentions.
Conflicts over the scope of a trustee s authority or the rights of beneficiaries can impede trust administration and prompt petitions for modification or clarification. When trustees and beneficiaries disagree about distributions, investments, or fiduciary duties, a petition can define responsibilities and authorize necessary changes to restore proper administration. Seeking court guidance addresses contested issues formally and provides a durable ruling that reduces ambiguity and helps trustees fulfill their duties while protecting beneficiaries interests under the trust structure.
We are available to assist Cameron Park residents with trust modification petitions and related estate planning services. Our office provides practical guidance on whether a nonjudicial amendment is possible or whether a court petition is needed. We assist with document review, preparation of petitions, notice to interested parties, and representation through hearings if required. Our goal is to help clients achieve legally sound modifications that reflect the settlor s intent while minimizing conflict, delays, and unnecessary expense in the trust administration process.
Our firm focuses on clear, client-centered representation for trust modifications and related estate planning matters. We take time to understand each client s objectives and family circumstances, then develop a strategy tailored to those needs. Whether pursuing a cooperative nonjudicial amendment or a court petition, we emphasize thorough preparation, timely communication, and practical solutions aimed at achieving a sustainable outcome. Clients receive guidance at each step so they can make informed decisions about the best route to update or clarify a trust.
We help clients gather the necessary documentation, identify beneficiaries and interested parties, and present persuasive factual and legal support for modifications. Our team manages the administrative complexities of filing and serving petitions, and we coordinate with trustees and other attorneys when necessary to pursue negotiated resolutions. For contested matters, we prepare compelling presentations to the court while striving to limit costs and focus on resolutions that preserve family relationships and the long-term management of trust assets.
Local knowledge of California probate and trust law informs our approach to trust modification petitions for Cameron Park clients. We combine careful legal analysis with practical experience to anticipate issues and propose solutions that protect client interests. Our commitment to responsive communication ensures clients understand their options and the likely timeline for resolution. Whether the goal is minor clarifying changes or significant modifications requiring court approval, we provide steady guidance and pursue the most efficient, effective path to achieve the client s objectives.
Our process begins with an initial consultation to review the trust and discuss the reasons for modification. We then gather relevant documents and identify all interested parties who must be notified. If a nonjudicial amendment is feasible and all parties agree, we draft and execute the amendment. If a court petition is necessary, we prepare a thorough petition supported by evidence and legal argument, file it with the appropriate probate court, serve notice to interested parties, and represent the client in hearings to obtain the requested modification or clarification.
The first step is a comprehensive assessment of the trust documents, any amendments, related estate planning materials, and the factual circumstances prompting the change. We review the trust language for amendment provisions, no-contest clauses, and trustee powers, and we evaluate whether consent of beneficiaries is possible. Document review includes assets currently titled to the trust and any accounts that may require correction. This thorough analysis informs whether a simple amendment or a court petition will be the most effective way to proceed.
Identifying all beneficiaries, trustees, and potential interested parties is essential to ensure proper notice and to determine who must consent to any amendment. We also inventory assets to confirm what is presently in the trust and whether any property needs to be transferred or recognized by the court through a Heggstad petition. This step prevents surprises later in the process and helps frame the legal arguments for modification by tying requested changes to the full picture of trust assets and parties.
We evaluate the legal grounds for modification by examining whether the settlor s intent can be established, whether a mistake or ambiguity exists, and whether the trust allows nonjudicial amendments. When a court petition is contemplated, we assemble evidence such as declarations, correspondence, or expert witness observations that support the proposed change. The analysis focuses on presenting a legally coherent case that explains why the modification aligns with the settlor s probable wishes and how it serves the beneficiaries interests under applicable law.
Once the appropriate path is chosen, we prepare the necessary documents to implement the modification. For consensual amendments we draft clear, legally enforceable instrument updates. For court petitions we draft a petition that identifies the trust provisions to be changed, the factual basis for the request, and the relief sought. We handle filing with the probate court and ensure proper service on all interested parties so the matter proceeds in compliance with California procedural rules and statutory notice requirements.
Drafting clear and persuasive documents is fundamental to obtaining a favorable outcome. We prepare petitions with precise language, factual declarations that support the requested modification, and citations to legal authority where appropriate. For amendments, we craft language that integrates seamlessly with the existing trust to avoid future ambiguity. Attention to detail in drafting reduces the chance of contested hearings and increases the likelihood that the court or interested parties will accept the proposed change.
Proper service of notice on beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties is required to protect procedural rights and validate the process. We manage service requirements, file proof of service with the court, and address any objections or procedural challenges that arise. Compliance with statutory timelines and local court rules minimizes delay and helps keep the matter moving efficiently toward resolution. When disputes arise, documented and proper service supports the integrity of the petition process.
If a court hearing is necessary, we prepare to present the factual record and legal arguments to the probate court, addressing any opposition and explaining why the modification is appropriate. After the court issues an order, we implement the changes by updating trust records, retitling assets if required, and advising trustees and beneficiaries on the new terms. Follow-up may include revising related estate planning documents and ensuring administrative tasks are completed so the modified trust functions as intended.
At a hearing, the court expects a clear presentation of the facts supporting the requested modification and reasoned responses to any objections. We present declarations, documentary evidence, and legal argument to show why the change aligns with the settlor s intent or remedies a mistake. Addressing objections thoughtfully can persuade the court to grant modification and limit future challenges. Effective advocacy also seeks to preserve relationships where possible by proposing reasonable accommodations in settlements when appropriate.
After the court approves a modification, implementing the order includes updating trust documents, ensuring assets are properly titled, and providing copies of the amended trust to trustees and relevant institutions. We also advise clients on any additional steps such as updating beneficiary designations, powers of attorney, or healthcare directives to reflect the modified plan. Clear instructions to trustees and administrators help prevent confusion and support consistent administration of the trust under the new terms.
To file a trust modification petition in California, you must prepare a petition that identifies the trust, the specific provisions to be changed, and the legal and factual grounds supporting the requested modification. The petition must name and provide notice to all interested parties, such as beneficiaries and trustees, to ensure they have an opportunity to respond. Supporting documents, declarations, and any evidence that establishes the settlor s intent, mistakes in drafting, or changed circumstances should be attached to build a persuasive record for the court. The probate court will review the petition, evaluate the evidence, and consider objections from interested parties before deciding whether to grant the modification. Proper service of notice and compliance with local court procedures are essential to avoid delay. Preparing a thorough petition helps the court understand why the change is necessary and how it serves the interests of those affected by the trust, which increases the likelihood of a clear, enforceable outcome.
Beneficiaries can object to a petition to modify a trust, and their objections may lead to contested proceedings where the court evaluates competing positions. Objections are most effective when they raise valid factual or legal concerns about the proposed change, such as claims that the modification conflicts with the settlor s intent or that proper notice was not given. The court weighs these objections along with the evidence supporting the petition to determine whether the modification is appropriate under the circumstances. Even when beneficiaries oppose a modification, the court may still approve it if the petition establishes valid grounds, such as a clear drafting error or a need to align the trust with the settlor s probable wishes. When opposition arises, efforts to negotiate a settlement or to mediate disputes can be productive and sometimes lead to agreed amendments that avoid a protracted court battle while preserving relationships among interested parties.
The timeline for a court-ordered trust modification varies depending on the complexity of the issues, the level of opposition, and the court s schedule. Simple, uncontested matters that involve clear documentation and agreement among parties can be resolved more quickly, while contested petitions that require multiple hearings, discovery, or extensive factual development may take several months or longer. Local court caseloads and procedural requirements also influence the timeline for resolution. Planning for a realistic timeline and maintaining clear communication with all interested parties can help minimize delays. Preparing thorough petitions and responding promptly to procedural matters supports smoother progress. When timing is essential, exploring nonjudicial amendment options or negotiated agreements can provide a faster path to change where appropriate, reducing the need for extended court proceedings.
Modifying a trust may have implications for related estate planning documents such as wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives, so it s important to review these instruments together. A change in trust terms could affect asset distribution or trustee responsibilities, and related documents might need updates to remain consistent and avoid conflicting instructions. Coordinating revisions helps ensure that the overall estate plan functions cohesively and reflects the settlor s current intentions. After a modification is finalized, reviewing beneficiary designations on retirement accounts, payable-on-death accounts, and life insurance policies is also important, since those designations can override trust instructions if not aligned. Updating powers of attorney and health care directives to mirror changes in trustee or agent appointments helps maintain clarity about authority and intent during incapacity or administration.
A Heggstad petition requests that the court recognize certain assets as part of a trust when those assets were never properly transferred or titled to the trust despite the settlor s intent. This petition is appropriate when paperwork errors or omissions result in assets being left outside the trust, potentially undermining the settlor s plan. The petition provides a judicial remedy to correct the record and ensure those assets are administered consistent with the trust terms. Heggstad petitions require evidence showing the settlor intended the assets to be part of the trust, such as declarations, contemporaneous documents, or other indications of intent. When successful, the court treats the identified assets as trust property, which helps avoid estate probate for those items and aligns administration with the settlor s original plan, preventing unintended distributions.
A trustee may be removed or replaced through court proceedings when there is valid cause, such as a breach of fiduciary duty, incapacity, mismanagement, or when the trustee s continued service would work substantial harm to the beneficiaries. A petition can request the court to remove the trustee and appoint a successor if necessary. The court evaluates the facts and the best interests of the beneficiaries in deciding whether to order removal or substitution of trustees. When removal is sought, thorough documentation of alleged misconduct, incapacity, or inability to perform fiduciary duties supports the petition. In some cases, parties can agree to appoint a successor trustee without court intervention, which is often faster and less adversarial. When agreement is not possible, the court s oversight provides a formal resolution that protects beneficiaries and ensures trust administration continues under competent stewardship.
Alternatives to filing a formal petition include negotiated amendments, mediation, or nonjudicial modification if the trust document allows changes by consent of all interested parties. These approaches can be less costly and quicker than court proceedings, and they may preserve family relationships by encouraging collaborative resolutions. When parties can communicate openly and reach consensus, a properly executed amendment can achieve the desired change without involving the probate court. Mediation provides a structured setting for parties to explore solutions with the help of a neutral facilitator, which can be especially helpful when emotions or misunderstandings impede direct negotiation. Before pursuing alternatives, it is important to evaluate whether all necessary parties can and will consent and whether related legal or procedural constraints allow a nonjudicial approach to accomplish the intended modification.
Disputes over trustee actions that arise during a modification process may be addressed through petitioning the court for instructions, seeking removal for cause, or asking the court to clarify the trustee s powers and duties. The court can issue directives that guide trustee behavior and resolve contested matters, preventing unilateral actions that could harm beneficiaries. Proper legal procedures and notice help ensure that any contested trustee actions are reviewed and resolved fairly. Gathering documentary evidence of trustee decisions and communications is important when raising concerns. The court considers whether the trustee acted within the scope of the trust and adhered to fiduciary duties. Seeking resolution through court oversight can restore proper administration while protecting beneficiaries rights and establishing clear expectations for trustee conduct going forward.
Evidence that supports a petition to modify a trust includes the original trust document and any amendments, declarations from witnesses or the settlor if available, correspondence showing intent, contemporaneous notes, and financial records demonstrating asset transfers or omissions. Documentary evidence that clarifies ambiguous language or shows a mistake in drafting strengthens a petition s credibility. In many cases, an organized factual record is central to persuading the court to authorize changes in trust terms. Additional helpful materials may include medical records or capacity evaluations if capacity is an issue, affidavits explaining the settlor s intent, and expert observations about customary practice in drafting or administration when relevant. Presenting a coherent narrative supported by documents reduces uncertainty for the court and increases the likelihood of a durable order that accomplishes the intended modification.
The cost of pursuing a trust modification petition varies based on complexity, the need for litigation, and whether the matter is contested. Simple amendments completed with the consent of all parties typically involve modest legal fees for drafting and execution. By contrast, contested petitions requiring formal filings, multiple court appearances, and extensive preparation can result in higher costs that reflect the time and resources required to present the case effectively. Discussing fee structures and alternatives early in the process helps clients understand likely expenses and evaluate nonjudicial paths when feasible. Our approach includes clear communication about anticipated costs and options to pursue the most efficient resolution given the circumstances. Exploring negotiated settlements or mediation can often reduce expenses while achieving acceptable outcomes for the parties involved.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas