A Heggstad petition can be an essential legal tool when assets were intended to be held in a trust but title was never retitled before a property owner’s death. In South Lake Tahoe and throughout California, families often discover after a loved one dies that a home, bank account, or other asset still bears the deceased individual’s name rather than the name of their trust. The Heggstad process seeks court confirmation that those assets should be treated as trust property. This guide explains what a Heggstad petition is, how it works, and what to expect when pursuing this remedy under California law.
Many people turn to a Heggstad petition because it offers a way to transfer assets into a decedent’s trust without a full probate administration. The petition asks the probate court to determine that the decedent intended the asset to be in the trust and that evidence supports treating the asset as trust property. This approach can save time and reduce costs compared with formal probate, while restoring the trust’s intended distribution plan. The following sections outline common situations that lead to a Heggstad filing, the typical steps involved, and how to gather the documentation courts most often find persuasive.
A Heggstad petition matters because it can preserve the decedent’s estate plan and honor the purpose of a trust by avoiding unnecessary probate procedures. When the probate court recognizes an asset as trust property, beneficiaries can receive distributions according to the trust terms rather than subject to probate administration and public records. This can result in faster resolution, lower administrative costs, and greater privacy for family affairs. Additionally, resolving title or account ownership problems through a petition can prevent future disputes among heirs and streamline estate settlement by aligning legal ownership with the decedent’s documented intentions.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning services with a focus on helping clients in California address trust administration and related court proceedings. The firm prepares and reviews documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related trust instruments, and assists families when title problems arise after a death. In matters like Heggstad petitions, the firm helps collect supporting evidence, draft pleadings, and present a clear factual record to the probate court. Clients receive practical guidance on what documentation matters to the court and how the petition process fits within broader estate administration goals.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to declare that certain property belongs to a deceased person’s trust, even though title or account records still reflect individual ownership. California courts evaluate multiple types of evidence, including the trust agreement, deeds, beneficiary designations, trust account records, and testimony, to determine whether the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. This petition is often appropriate when there is strong documentary or circumstantial evidence that retitling was intended but not completed before death. The court’s ruling can bring clarity and allow the trustee to administer the asset under the trust terms.
The Heggstad process commonly involves an initial assessment of ownership documents, preparation of a petition describing the property and supporting facts, and filing in the appropriate probate court. Notice to beneficiaries and interested parties is typically required so that those with potential claims can respond. The court may set a hearing and, in some cases, request further evidence or testimony. If the court finds in favor of the petition, it will enter an order confirming trust ownership, which allows the trustee to take actions such as transferring title, accessing accounts, or distributing assets according to the trust instrument.
A Heggstad petition takes its name from a California case that sets out the framework for proving that property belongs to a trust despite title remaining in the decedent’s name. The petition seeks a judicial declaration that, based on the trust document and supporting evidence, the property should be treated as trust property for purposes of administration and distribution. This remedy is often sought when technical lapses occurred during estate planning, such as failing to change title documentation after creating a trust, or when certain assets were overlooked. It provides a court-supervised method to align legal ownership with the decedent’s documented plan.
When evaluating a Heggstad petition, courts typically look for a combination of documentary and factual evidence showing intent to include the asset in the trust. Relevant elements include the trust agreement itself, deeds or account forms indicating transfer intent, correspondence or instructions about retitling, beneficiary designations consistent with the trust, and testimony from the person who prepared the trust or from close associates. The petition must describe the asset in detail, explain the basis for inclusion, and provide the court with sufficient evidence to conclude the decedent intended the property to be trust property at the time of death.
Understanding common terms can make the Heggstad process less intimidating. Familiarity with phrases like trust, trustee, beneficiary, title, probate court order, and successor trustee helps clients follow the petition and subsequent administration steps. A basic grasp of how deeds, beneficiary designations, and account registration affect ownership is also useful. Below are short definitions of important terms you may encounter when pursuing a Heggstad petition, along with why each element matters to the court’s review and the practical administration of trust assets after a favorable ruling.
A trust is a written legal arrangement in which a settlor transfers property to a trustee to hold for the benefit of named beneficiaries according to the trust terms. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the trust document is often the central piece of evidence because it reflects the decedent’s distribution intentions and identifies who should control and receive property after death. When assets were intended to be in the trust but remain titled in the decedent’s name, the trust instrument and related records are used to demonstrate that intent to the probate court so the court may align legal ownership with the settlor’s documented plan.
A trustee is the individual or entity appointed to manage trust assets and carry out the terms of the trust for the benefit of beneficiaries. In a Heggstad petition, the trustee may be the person who files the petition asking the court to declare that specified property belongs to the trust. The trustee’s role includes presenting evidence that supports inclusion of the property, explaining the trust’s administration plan, and, following any court order, taking necessary steps to transfer or manage the asset under the trust provisions for the benefit of the beneficiaries.
A probate court order is a formal written determination issued by the court that resolves a legal question related to an estate or trust administration. For a Heggstad petition, the probate court order may expressly confirm that an asset is trust property, enabling the trustee to exercise authority over the asset without a full probate estate administration. This order provides legal clarity to banks, county recorders, and other institutions so they will release funds or transfer title consistent with the court’s determination and the trustee’s fiduciary duties under the trust.
A successor trustee is the person or entity named in the trust to take over management of trust assets after the original trustee dies or becomes unable to serve. When a Heggstad petition is necessary, a successor trustee often files the petition to establish that certain property belongs to the trust so the successor trustee can carry out the trust’s terms. Evidence about the successor trustee’s authority and the trust’s provisions can be important to the court when determining whether to confirm trust ownership and allow the successor trustee to administer or distribute the asset accordingly.
Families confronting improperly titled assets generally consider alternatives such as filing a Heggstad petition, opening a probate estate, or pursuing a petition for summary administration where appropriate. A Heggstad petition can be less intrusive than full probate, since it seeks a targeted court determination rather than administration of an entire estate. However, probate may be required when there are multiple assets not in trust, significant creditor claims, or unresolved disputes among heirs. The right approach depends on the asset types, the strength of documentary evidence, the number of interested parties, and timeline considerations.
A limited Heggstad petition is often suitable when one or a small number of assets were clearly meant to be trust property but were never retitled prior to death. Examples include a single real property parcel, a bank account, or a brokerage account. If the trust document and related records provide a clear trail showing the decedent’s intent, and there are few interested parties or disputes, a focused petition can efficiently resolve ownership. This approach can minimize court involvement, lower fees, and allow the trustee to proceed with trust administration without opening a broader probate estate.
When the decedent left strong documentary evidence—such as a trust agreement explicitly naming the asset, related transfer paperwork, or consistent beneficiary designations—a limited petition can succeed more readily. Courts look for a persuasive factual record demonstrating that the decedent intended the asset to be held in the trust. If that evidence exists and there are no significant creditor or competing beneficiary claims, a Heggstad petition provides a streamlined path to confirm ownership and restore trust control, allowing distributions or transfers to occur under the trust’s terms.
Comprehensive legal assistance is recommended when there are multiple assets incorrectly titled, complex ownership histories, competing beneficiary claims, or significant potential creditor issues. In those situations, the court may require a more extensive review or even a probate administration to resolve all matters appropriately. A coordinated approach helps identify which assets are best addressed through Heggstad petitions and which require other forms of court supervision, ensuring the estate administration proceeds in an orderly fashion while protecting the rights of beneficiaries and creditors.
When documentation is incomplete, records conflict, or beneficiaries challenge the trust’s scope, a more comprehensive legal strategy becomes necessary. Litigation risk can increase administrative time and costs, and courts may need additional evidence such as witness testimony or forensic records. Broader legal representation can help manage discovery, negotiate settlements among interested parties, and present a coherent case to the court. These steps help protect the trust’s objectives while addressing disputes in a way that seeks to preserve family relationships and minimize delays.
A comprehensive approach to addressing mis-titled assets combines careful document review, clear legal filings, and strategic coordination of court procedures when necessary. By taking a broad view, trustees and families can identify potential problems early, address related estate planning gaps such as missing beneficiary designations, and reduce the risk of later disputes. This method often results in smoother administration, better protection of beneficiaries’ interests, and clearer instructions to financial institutions or county recorders that may require a court order or additional documentation to transfer assets into the trust.
Another advantage of a comprehensive strategy is proactive risk management. When attorneys review the entire estate plan alongside account registrations and deeds, they can spot inconsistencies and recommend corrective actions that prevent future litigation. This may include preparing pour-over wills, executing certifications of trust, or arranging successor trustee documentation. By closing gaps now, families preserve the intent of the estate plan and minimize delays in distributing assets consistent with the settlor’s wishes, while ensuring legal steps are taken to satisfy third parties who control asset transfers.
A full review and coordinated legal plan increase the likelihood that assets will be transferred in a manner consistent with the trust terms and the decedent’s intent. When the trustee files appropriate petitions and compiles persuasive documentation, institutions such as banks and title companies are more likely to accept transfers. This reduces administrative friction and the need for repeated court interventions. The resulting clarity helps trustees carry out distributions efficiently and helps beneficiaries receive assets without prolonged administrative procedures or additional challenges.
Taking a comprehensive approach reduces the chance that unresolved title or documentation issues will spark future disputes among family members or creditors. By documenting the basis for trusting a property to be in the trust and pursuing necessary court orders where appropriate, trustees can limit uncertainty about ownership. Clear court rulings and well-organized records make it less likely that later challenges will succeed, promoting a more predictable and orderly distribution of assets and helping families avoid prolonged conflicts that can be emotionally and financially draining.
Begin by collecting all documents that reflect the decedent’s intent to place assets in a trust. This includes the trust agreement, deeds, account statements, transfer instructions, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence about retitling. Police or bank forms showing completed transfer steps, drafts of transfer documents, and records of the settlor’s conversations with advisors can also help. A well-organized folder of evidence lets the court see a consistent pattern of intent, strengthening the petition and potentially shortening the process by reducing the need for follow-up discovery or contested proceedings.
Recognize that banks, title companies, and government offices may require particular forms or court orders before releasing funds or transferring title. Prepare to provide certified copies of documents, court orders, and proof of the successor trustee’s authority. Anticipating these institutional requirements helps avoid repeated trips to the courthouse and additional delays. Understanding the procedural steps and timing involved with each institution can speed up asset transfers once a favorable court determination is obtained and ensure the trustee can take necessary actions without unnecessary administrative hurdles.
Consider a Heggstad petition if you discover after a death that an asset intended for a trust still bears the deceased person’s name and there are clear signs the decedent meant the property to be in the trust. Common triggers include a deed not retitled into the trustee’s name, bank accounts still registered individually, or an institutional refusal to recognize trust ownership. If the trust terms are clear and supporting documents exist, a petition may help avoid a protracted probate administration and align legal ownership with the decedent’s documented plan.
You should also weigh a Heggstad petition when privacy concerns, time sensitivity, and cost control are priorities. A successful petition often keeps matters within the trust framework and out of a full probate estate, protecting family privacy by avoiding public probate filings. If beneficiaries seek a prompt resolution and creditor exposure appears minimal, the petition route can often move more quickly than comprehensive probate. Consulting about available evidence and likely court outcomes helps determine whether this is the preferred path in your situation.
Common circumstances prompting a Heggstad filing include real property where the deed was not retitled into the name of the trust, financial accounts that were not re-registered after the trust was created, or when a what appears to be an oversight leaves assets outside the trust. Other triggers include institutional refusal to release funds to a trustee without a court order or conflicting records that make ownership unclear. Identifying the exact nature of the title or registration issue helps determine whether a Heggstad petition or an alternative remedy is the most efficient course of action.
One common scenario is a homeowner who signed a revocable living trust but never recorded a new deed transferring the home into that trust. After the homeowner dies, the successor trustee intends to follow the trust’s distribution plan, but county records continue to show the property in the decedent’s name. A Heggstad petition can ask the probate court to confirm that the home was intended to be trust property, allowing the trustee to transfer title or sell the property according to the trust’s directions without opening a full probate estate.
Financial accounts are often overlooked when a trust is created, leaving checking, savings, or brokerage accounts titled in the decedent’s individual name. When the trustee requests access or transfer of those funds, the bank may require a court order. Filing a Heggstad petition can provide the authorization courts often accept to confirm that the accounts were meant to be part of the trust, enabling the trustee to transfer or distribute funds consistent with the trust’s instructions and avoid an expanded probate administration.
Sometimes documentation is incomplete or appears contradictory, such as a trust that references an asset but lacks direct transfer paperwork, or a deed that was prepared but not recorded. In such cases, a Heggstad petition can allow the court to weigh the totality of the evidence, including testimony, correspondence, and related documents, to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. This process helps resolve uncertainty and provides a clear legal basis for subsequent trust administration actions.
If you are dealing with mis-titled assets in South Lake Tahoe, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is the right course. The firm can assist in gathering the necessary documents, drafting the petition, giving proper notice to interested parties, and presenting evidence to the probate court. Practical support includes preparing certification of trust documents, coordinating with title companies and banks, and advising trustees on how to follow court orders to transfer assets into the trust so distributions can proceed according to the settlor’s wishes.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for careful legal guidance through trust and probate matters, including Heggstad petitions. The firm helps families assemble the factual record the court will require and tailors filings to the specific property and local court practices in California. This focused support aims to reduce delays and administrative burdens, working with trustees to secure the court determinations needed to transfer assets into the trust and complete distributions in alignment with the settlor’s stated intentions.
The firm works with clients to evaluate whether a targeted petition or a broader probate filing is the most appropriate path, considering factors such as the number of assets, potential creditor exposure, and the presence of competing claims. The approach emphasizes clear communication with beneficiaries and institutions, efficient document preparation, and practical steps to satisfy recording and banking requirements once a court order is obtained. As a result, trustees can focus on administering the trust while the firm handles procedural and evidentiary matters.
In South Lake Tahoe and across California, timely action to address mis-titled assets helps keep estate plans on track. The firm also offers assistance with related documents such as pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and powers of attorney to prevent similar issues in the future. By addressing immediate title problems and recommending preventive measures, the firm helps families preserve the intent of their estate plans and reduce the need for court intervention down the road.
Our process begins with a thorough document review and a discussion about the asset at issue, the trust instrument, and any related records. We identify the strongest evidence supporting inclusion in the trust, outline the likely steps and timeline for court filings, and prepare all necessary pleadings and notices for interested parties. We coordinate with the probate court, manage service requirements, and advocate for a clear judicial order confirming trust ownership so the trustee can proceed with administration and distributions consistent with the trust’s terms.
The first step is gathering documents and information to build a persuasive factual record. This includes the trust agreement, deeds, account statements, transfer instructions, and any communications or draft documents reflecting intent to retitle assets. We also compile contact information for potential interested parties and determine whether notice requirements or potential objections exist. This preparation sets the foundation for a focused petition and helps predict likely court inquiries, which can reduce the need for additional rounds of document production or surprise evidentiary disputes later on.
Collecting relevant documents is essential to support a Heggstad petition. We request certified copies of deeds, account statements, trust documents, and any drafts or communications that show the decedent’s intent. This also includes records of attempts to retitle property, such as correspondence with banks, title companies, or attorneys, and any receipts or forms reflecting actions taken. A thorough review identifies gaps and determines whether additional evidence or witness testimony is advisable to strengthen the petition before filing with the probate court.
We identify beneficiaries, heirs, and creditors who might be interested in or affected by the petition and determine the appropriate parties to serve. Proper notice is a legal requirement, and careful attention to who must be informed helps prevent procedural problems. We prepare notice documents and manage service of process where required, explaining to clients what responses might look like and outlining timelines for objections or hearings. Anticipating potential disputes allows us to address concerns proactively and move the petition forward efficiently.
After assembling the evidence and completing initial preparations, the next step is filing the Heggstad petition with the probate court. The petition details the asset, explains the decedent’s intent, and attaches supporting documents. We also file any required declarations and exhibits, as well as proposed orders for the court to consider. Serving notice on interested parties follows, giving them an opportunity to respond. This stage moves the matter into the court’s review process and sets the stage for a hearing if any objections are raised.
Drafting an effective petition requires a clear narrative tying the trust document and supporting records to the asset in question. Declarations under penalty of perjury can summarize documentary evidence and, if needed, provide witness statements about the decedent’s intent. We format exhibits so the court can readily review deeds, account records, and relevant communications. Properly prepared materials reduce the likelihood of requests for supplemental evidence and help the court make an informed decision on whether to confirm trust ownership.
Serving the petition and completing administrative filings with the court are procedural steps that must be handled carefully. We ensure timely service on beneficiaries and other interested parties, file proof of service, and submit any required filing fees and forms. We also monitor the court docket for responses and prepare replies or supplemental evidence if objections arise. Keeping the administrative side organized helps the case proceed smoothly and allows us to focus on presenting the strongest possible factual record to the court.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the factual record and explain how the evidence supports recognizing the asset as trust property. When the court issues an order in favor of the petition, the trustee receives a written directive that can be provided to banks, title companies, or county recorders to complete transfers or access funds. Post-order steps may include recording a certified court order for a deed transfer, providing the bank with required documentation to change account registration, and taking actions necessary to distribute or manage the asset in accordance with the trust.
Preparing for a hearing involves organizing exhibits, preparing witness declarations, and developing a concise presentation of the facts that demonstrates the decedent’s intent. We anticipate likely questions from the court and prepare responses to address any uncertainties about documents or timelines. A clear, organized presentation reduces the risk of delays and helps the judge understand the basis for the petition. If no objections are filed, the court may grant the petition without a contested hearing, but preparation helps ensure readiness if a hearing becomes necessary.
Once the court enters an order confirming trust ownership, the trustee can provide certified copies of the order and related trust documents to institutions that control the asset. This allows banks to release funds, title companies to record transfers, and trustees to carry out distributions as directed by the trust. We assist with these post-order steps, coordinating with institutions to meet their requirements and ensuring the transfer or access is completed correctly so the asset can be managed or distributed in line with the settlor’s wishes.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing asking a probate court to declare that specific property should be treated as trust property, even though title or account registration still lists the decedent’s name. It is commonly used when a decedent executed a revocable living trust but failed to retitle certain assets before death. The petition presents evidence showing the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust and seeks a judicial order confirming that treatment so the trustee can administer or distribute the property according to the trust. Families pursue a Heggstad petition to align legal ownership with the settlor’s documented plan while avoiding a full probate administration when possible. The petition offers a focused remedy for particular assets, rather than opening a complete probate estate. This can save time, reduce public exposure of estate details, and minimize administrative costs compared with probate under the right circumstances, provided the court is persuaded by the submitted evidence and procedural requirements are met.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies based on the court’s schedule, the completeness of the supporting evidence, and whether interested parties object. In straightforward cases with clear documentation and no objections, the process may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, depending on local court processing times. Where the court requires a hearing or additional evidence, the timeline can lengthen accordingly. Preparing a thorough petition and organizing exhibits in advance can reduce the likelihood of delays caused by follow-up requests. If objections are filed or evidence is incomplete, the process may extend into several months as the parties engage in discovery or the court schedules contested hearings. The need for additional witness testimony, expert valuation, or resolution of competing claims can also lengthen the process. Early assessment of potential issues and proactive communication with interested parties help streamline proceedings and provide a clearer estimate of expected timeframes for resolution.
Courts typically require evidence that shows the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Useful evidence includes the trust document itself, deeds or account forms showing transfer intent, correspondence about retitling, beneficiary designations consistent with the trust, and records of interactions with financial institutions or title companies. Declarations from witnesses familiar with the decedent’s intentions and drafts or completed transfer documents can also be persuasive. The court reviews the totality of the evidence to determine whether trust ownership is supported. Organizing a clear, chronological presentation of documents and declarations helps the court evaluate consent and intent more efficiently. Where direct documentary evidence is lacking, corroborating testimony and circumstantial evidence may still establish the decedent’s intent. Preparing exhibits in a coherent manner and anticipating questions the court may have reduces the need for supplemental filings and makes it easier for the judge to reach a decision on whether to confirm trust ownership.
A Heggstad petition can avoid a full probate administration for the specific asset in question if the court confirms trust ownership. It is a targeted remedy intended to correct title or registration issues for particular property rather than replace all probate procedures. If only a small number of assets are affected and the evidence supports trust ownership, those assets can be administered under the trust without opening a broader probate estate. This preserves privacy and can reduce administrative costs for those assets. However, a Heggstad petition does not necessarily avoid probate for other assets outside the trust or situations that require probate for other reasons, such as significant creditor claims or contested issues unrelated to a specific asset’s title. If multiple assets require court oversight or there are substantial disputes, a probate administration may still be necessary. Evaluating the overall estate context helps determine whether a targeted petition or probate is the most appropriate route.
Notice requirements vary by jurisdiction and the nature of the petition, but generally interested parties must be informed, including beneficiaries under the trust, heirs at law, and creditors in some circumstances. Proper notice ensures that those who may be affected have an opportunity to respond or object and protects the court’s jurisdiction to enter a binding order. Identifying the correct parties to serve and following statutory notice procedures is a critical procedural step in the petition process. Failing to provide required notice can result in delays or the need to refile documents, so careful attention to procedural rules is important. We help identify the proper parties and complete proof of service filings, reducing the risk of procedural defects. Ensuring that notice is timely and properly documented also increases the likelihood that the court will consider the petition without unnecessary procedural objections.
Banks and title companies generally follow the probate court’s orders and will accept a certified copy of a court determination confirming that an asset belongs to a trust. However, institutions may have internal policies requiring specific forms, affidavits, or additional documentation in addition to the court order. Coordinating with the institution early and understanding its requirements helps avoid repeated trips and expedites the transfer process once the court order is obtained. In rare cases, an institution may resist action even after an order, prompting additional filings or communications. If a problem arises, we work with the trustee to provide the institution the documents it needs, including certified court orders and trust certifications, and we assist in enforcing compliance if necessary. Clear documentation and cooperative engagement with institutions reduce friction after the court issues its ruling.
If beneficiaries object to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider those objections and may schedule a contested hearing to resolve factual disputes. Objections can arise from differing interpretations of the trust, competing inheritance claims, or challenges to the authenticity or sufficiency of evidence. When objections are filed, the proceeding transitions from an uncontested administrative matter to one that requires careful case development, witness declarations, and possibly testimony to resolve the contested issues. When objections are likely, engaging in early communication and attempting to negotiate a resolution may avoid prolonged litigation. If settlement is not possible, we prepare to present a persuasive factual record at hearing to demonstrate the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust. The court will weigh the evidence from both sides and issue a ruling based on statutory standards and case law applicable to Heggstad matters.
A Heggstad petition can apply to a variety of asset types, including real property, bank and investment accounts, and other titled assets that were intended to be trust property. The key is showing the decedent’s intent and providing documentation that supports inclusion in the trust. Some assets may present additional procedural hurdles, such as retirement accounts with designated beneficiaries or assets that have special transfer restrictions, and those may require tailored approaches in addition to or instead of a Heggstad petition. Certain assets with beneficiary designations or contractual transfer provisions may be resolved through alternative procedures or additional forms, so it is important to evaluate each asset on its own facts. We review each asset’s title documents, contract terms, and account rules to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate or if another remedy is preferable to achieve the intended trust-based outcome.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary with the complexity of the matter, the amount of evidence required, local court filing fees, and whether the petition is contested. In straightforward, uncontested matters, fees are typically limited to document preparation, filing fees, and reasonable administrative expenses. When multiple assets or contested claims require additional discovery, witness preparation, or court hearings, costs will be higher. We provide an initial assessment to estimate likely costs based on the specifics of the case and the anticipated level of court involvement. Because litigation and contested proceedings increase expenses, pursuing a carefully prepared petition with thorough documentation often reduces overall costs by avoiding protracted disputes or repeated filings. Discussing the likely scenarios and potential contingencies upfront allows clients to plan financially and decide whether to pursue a targeted petition, negotiate with interested parties, or consider alternative legal strategies.
To reduce the likelihood of needing a Heggstad petition, take proactive steps during life planning to ensure assets are properly titled and beneficiary designations align with the trust. Recording deeds in the name of the trust, updating account registrations, and coordinating with financial institutions to retitle accounts when a trust is created helps prevent title gaps. Regularly reviewing estate planning documents and asset registrations after significant life events, such as moves, marriages, or changes in financial institutions, also decreases the chance that assets will be overlooked. Additionally, preparing and maintaining clear records of intent, such as correspondence with advisors or notes regarding transfer instructions, can be useful if questions arise later. Working with legal counsel to prepare a pour-over will, certifications of trust, and related documents provides backup measures to support the trust’s administration, while routine maintenance and periodic reviews help keep asset ownership consistent with the settlor’s plan.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas