A Heggstad petition is a legal filing used to place assets into a decedent’s trust when transfers were attempted outside the trust but intended to benefit it. For individuals and families in Biola, understanding this remedy can avoid probate delays and help carry out a loved one’s estate plan. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman handle matters related to trusts and probate in California and can evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate based on your situation. Early assessment helps preserve estate assets, protect beneficiaries’ interests, and reduce uncertainty about ownership and distribution after a decedent’s death.
Many families discover that assets meant to be part of a trust were transferred incorrectly or not retitled before a trustmaker’s passing. A Heggstad petition provides a pathway to recognize those assets as trust property when the facts show the transferor intended them to be included. For Biola residents, the petition process involves reviewing trust documents, deeds, beneficiary designations, and other transfer records. The goal is to present clear, admissible evidence to the court to avoid a full probate administration and to implement the decedent’s estate plan consistent with their expressed desires and legal documents.
A properly pursued Heggstad petition can restore intended trust ownership and spare heirs the costs and delays of probate. When property was meant to fund a living trust but remains titled in a deceased person’s name or was transferred via defective instruments, the petition can clarify the decedent’s intent and transfer the asset into the trust’s control. Benefits include more efficient estate administration, honoring the decedent’s plan, and reducing disputes among family members. For Biola residents, using this remedy can safeguard sensitive assets and help trustees carry out distributions with court recognition that reflects the original estate planning goals.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers personalized estate planning and trust administration services for families across California, including Biola. Our practice focuses on careful document review, clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, and practical solutions that reflect each client’s needs. We assist with assessing whether a Heggstad petition is the right route, gathering the necessary evidence, and presenting a persuasive case to the court. Clients benefit from a steady, methodical approach that aims to resolve title issues while minimizing conflict and cost for loved ones during a difficult time.
A Heggstad petition arises when property intended to be part of a trust remains outside of that trust due to procedural or clerical errors. The petition asks the court to declare that the asset should be treated as trust property because the decedent intended to fund the trust. Evidence typically includes the trust instrument, contemporaneous documents, deeds, beneficiary designations, and testimony or affidavits demonstrating intent. For Biola residents, it is important to gather records early, because clear documentation strengthens the petition and reduces the likelihood of contested proceedings that can extend resolution and increase costs.
The Heggstad petition process includes preparing a verified petition, serving interested parties, and submitting supporting evidence to the probate court. The court will review whether the transferor intended the property to be held in trust and whether any legal requirements were met. If the court grants the petition, title is recognized in the name of the trustee for the trust, allowing the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust terms. This remedy helps families implement the decedent’s wishes without full probate, provided the facts support the requested relief.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing used in California to correct title when a deceased person intended to transfer property into a trust but failed to complete the necessary formal transfer. The court evaluates evidence of intent and the circumstances of the attempted transfer to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. The remedy is particularly useful when deeds, account registrations, or beneficiary designations do not reflect the trust, but other documentation indicates a clear intention to fund the trust. The remedy can streamline administration and prevent unnecessary probate proceedings when successful.
Courts reviewing Heggstad petitions look for persuasive proof that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Typical elements include a valid trust instrument, contemporaneous writings or declarations, matching beneficiary designations, and reliable testimony. Also relevant are the form of transfer, timing, and whether any procedural requirements were attempted but not completed. Properly prepared petitions include clear declarations, documentary evidence, and legal citations explaining why the asset should be treated as trust property. Gathering and organizing this evidence is essential to presenting a convincing case to the court.
Understanding legal terminology helps families navigate the petition process with confidence. Terms such as trust, trustee, beneficiary, probate, title, deed, and beneficiary designation are commonly used in court filings and discussions with attorneys. Familiarity with these phrases allows clients to provide the right documents and answer questions about intent and ownership. In many cases, the differences among these terms determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate or whether alternative remedies might better serve the estate plan and the interests of heirs and beneficiaries.
A trust is a legal arrangement in which one person places property under the control of another person or entity for the benefit of designated beneficiaries. Trusts are used to manage assets during life and after death according to the trustmaker’s instructions. In Heggstad matters, the trust instrument’s language and terms are key to showing whether the decedent intended a specific asset to be governed by the trust. Trustees have a fiduciary duty to manage and distribute trust assets in accordance with the trust document and applicable law.
A Heggstad petition is the formal court request used to have property declared part of a trust when title or formal transfer documentation does not reflect the trust despite the decedent’s intent. The petition relies on evidence such as the trust document, transfer attempts, or contemporaneous statements to show the property should be treated as trust property. If granted, the court’s order clarifies ownership and places the asset under trustee control for management or distribution under the trust terms.
Probate is the court-supervised process for settling an estate, validating wills, identifying assets, paying debts, and distributing property to heirs or beneficiaries. Probate can be time-consuming and costly. A successful Heggstad petition can reduce the need for probate by bringing assets into the trust, which often allows distribution outside probate and under the trust’s terms. Whether a property qualifies for transfer to a trust under a Heggstad petition depends on the documented intent and the legal circumstances surrounding the transfer.
A trustee is the person or entity appointed to manage trust property and carry out the trustmaker’s instructions for the benefit of designated beneficiaries. After a Heggstad petition is granted, the trustee typically receives formal acknowledgment of title and authority to manage the asset within the trust. Trustees owe duties of loyalty and care to beneficiaries and must follow the trust document. Clear court recognition of trust ownership helps trustees fulfill their responsibilities without dispute over asset title or distribution authority.
When assets are not properly titled in a trust, families can consider several remedies, including Heggstad petitions, probate administration, or corrective deeds and beneficiary updates. Heggstad petitions are appropriate when evidence shows the decedent intended the asset to fund the trust but formal transfer was incomplete. Probate addresses broader estate settlement needs but can be slower and more expensive. Corrective deeds or beneficiary changes may be available when living parties can retitle property, while contested disputes may require litigation. A careful comparison helps select the most efficient path for preserving the decedent’s intentions and minimizing cost.
A limited approach, such as a Heggstad petition, can be sufficient when there is clear contemporaneous documentation demonstrating the decedent’s intent to place the asset in the trust. This might include signed trust instruments, declarations, draft deeds, or beneficiary designations that match trust terms. If evidence is consistent and undisputed, a petition can be an efficient remedy to correct title without full probate. Taking quick action to collect and organize these documents strengthens the case and helps trustees and beneficiaries secure the intended asset transfer with minimal delay.
A limited approach is often appropriate when interested parties are cooperative and unlikely to contest the petition. When heirs and beneficiaries agree on the facts and support the trustmaker’s intent, a petition can move through the court process smoothly. Cooperation reduces the need for extended discovery, hearings, or adversarial motions, which can otherwise prolong resolution and increase costs. In those circumstances, a focused petition that compiles the relevant evidence can provide a swift resolution and allow trustees to assume control of the asset under the trust terms.
A comprehensive legal approach is needed when intent is disputed or multiple parties assert competing ownership or beneficiary claims. In such situations, resolving title may require deeper investigation, formal discovery, witness preparation, and litigated hearings to assess conflicting evidence. A fuller strategy can include parallel actions, negotiation, and careful court filings to protect the estate’s value and fiduciary roles. This broader approach seeks to resolve complex disputes while protecting beneficiaries’ interests and the trustee’s ability to manage the trust effectively.
Complex assets, such as real property with title issues, retirement accounts, or assets spanning multiple jurisdictions, often require comprehensive legal handling. When ownership involves multiple parties, loans, liens, or cross-state matters, resolving whether property belongs to a trust may require coordination with financial institutions, title companies, and other courts or agencies. A broad legal plan can include careful document reconstruction, third-party outreach, and negotiated resolutions that address creditors, tax considerations, and proper trustee authority, ensuring the trust holds and manages assets as intended.
A comprehensive approach to resolving trust title problems helps ensure all legal angles are assessed, reducing the risk of future disputes and protecting beneficiaries. By conducting a detailed review of documents, communications, and transfer history, a proactive plan can identify complications early and propose remedial actions that are legally defensible. In many cases, this approach saves time and money over the long term by preventing re-litigation and clarifying trustee authority. For those with significant or sensitive assets, a thorough strategy helps achieve durable, enforceable recognition of trust ownership.
Taking a comprehensive path also facilitates clearer communication among trustees, beneficiaries, and financial institutions, smoothing the transition of asset control after a trustmaker’s death. With careful attention to legal compliance and documentation, trustees can perform duties with greater confidence and transparency, reducing friction among heirs. Additionally, addressing potential creditor claims, tax effects, and title irregularities as part of the strategy promotes more predictable administration and helps ensure that distributions align with the trustmaker’s wishes as set out in the governing documents.
A thorough legal review and well-prepared petition increase the likelihood of achieving a court order that provides clear title and long-term certainty for trust assets. By anticipating likely challenges and addressing them with evidence and legal analysis, trustees reduce the chance of future litigation that can unsettle distributions and deplete estate value. Long-term certainty benefits beneficiaries by accelerating distributions when appropriate and by lowering the administrative burden on trustees, while helping families move forward with confidence in how the estate will be handled.
When title or account registrations are unclear, a comprehensive approach can coordinate necessary corrective steps, such as assembling documentary evidence, working with title companies, and preparing court filings that address multiple issues in a single proceeding. This coordinated effort often resolves complex ownership questions more efficiently than fragmented attempts to correct individual problems. The result is a streamlined process that conserves estate assets, reduces delays, and allows trustees to administer the trust according to the trustmaker’s instructions with fewer interruptions.
Begin by gathering all documents that could show the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. This includes the trust instrument, draft or signed deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, emails, notes, and any related communications. Timely collection reduces the risk that records will be lost and strengthens the evidence supporting a petition. For trustees and family members in Biola, organizing documents by date and relevance helps attorneys assess the case quickly and determine the most efficient path to correct title or pursue other remedies under California law.
Prompt action is important because key documents or witnesses may become unavailable with time. Preserve original documents, obtain certified copies of deeds or account records, and secure written statements from individuals with firsthand knowledge of the trustmaker’s intent. Quick preservation avoids evidentiary gaps and strengthens the factual record for a Heggstad petition. In circumstances involving multiple jurisdictions or third-party institutions, early outreach can ensure that required records are obtained and that deadlines and procedural requirements are met to support a successful court resolution.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets meant for a trust remain titled in the name of a deceased individual or were transferred in a way that did not complete the legal retitling. If the trust instrument and surrounding facts indicate that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust, a petition can provide a judicial declaration of trust ownership. This is often preferable to full probate and can speed administration when evidence is solid. Trustees and beneficiaries should assess whether the documentation supports the petition and whether interested parties are likely to contest the filing.
You should also consider a petition when transferring the asset by other means is impractical because the transferring party is deceased or when corrective deeds are not possible due to title complications. A Heggstad petition may address assets such as real property, bank accounts, or other titled interests where intent is documented but the formal transfer was incomplete. The petition allows the court to recognize the trust interest, enabling the trustee to manage or distribute the asset in accordance with the trust terms without full probate administration.
Typical scenarios include a decedent who prepared a trust but did not retitle property, bank accounts that were not re-registered, deeds with improper wording, or attempts to transfer assets shortly before death that were never finalized. Other situations include assets that were intended to be moved into a pour-over will but remained in the decedent’s name. In such cases, a Heggstad petition offers a judicial mechanism to align legal title with the trustmaker’s documented intent and allow the trustee to administer the asset under the trust terms.
Real estate is often central to Heggstad matters because deeds may not have been properly executed or recorded to place property into a trust. A deed that remains in the decedent’s name despite the existence of a trust can create uncertainty for heirs. A Heggstad petition can request a declaration that the property belonged to the trust based on the decedent’s intent and related documents. When supported by adequate evidence, the petition can allow the trustee to control real property without a full probate proceeding, simplifying management and distribution.
Financial accounts and retirement plans sometimes have beneficiary designations or registrations that conflict with the trustmaker’s overall plan. If an account was intended to be part of a trust but remains titled incorrectly, a Heggstad petition can seek court recognition of trust ownership. Resolving these issues may also involve coordination with the account custodian to update records after court orders are issued. Clear documentary evidence of intent helps establish that the decedent wanted those assets to be managed through the trust rather than through probate or individual heir transfers.
Sometimes transfers are attempted with draft documents, incomplete deeds, or other instruments that lack required signatures or recording. When these attempted transfers reflect the decedent’s intent but were not legally effective, a Heggstad petition can allow the court to treat the asset as part of the trust. Documentation such as draft deeds, correspondence, and witness statements can be critical to proving intent. Bringing the matter before the court helps secure clear title and allows trustees to carry out the trust’s terms with court recognition.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides local legal assistance for residents of Biola who face trust title questions or need to file a Heggstad petition. We work to explain the process, identify required documentation, and advocate for recognition of assets as trust property where the facts support that outcome. Our focus is on practical solutions that reduce administrative burdens and promote timely resolution. If you have questions about a possible Heggstad petition, reach out to discuss your situation and learn what steps can be taken to preserve the trustmaker’s intentions.
Choosing representation that understands California trust and probate procedures helps ensure petitions are prepared with the necessary legal foundation and documentary support. Our office assists clients in assembling relevant evidence, preparing verified petitions, and communicating with interested parties and the court. We emphasize clear explanations of options and likely outcomes so trustees and families can make informed decisions about pursuing a petition versus alternative remedies. This process-driven approach helps clients navigate the legal steps with greater clarity and fewer surprises.
We prioritize careful document review and methodical preparation, focusing on the facts that courts will consider in determining trust ownership. Timely, organized submissions to the court and thoughtful legal arguments can reduce the likelihood of extended disputes. For Biola residents, this means working to achieve recognition of trust property in a way that protects beneficiaries, supports trustee duties, and helps implement the decedent’s plan. Our goal is to provide practical representation that aligns with each client’s objectives and the realities of California probate practice.
Clients receive guidance on communication with third parties such as title companies and financial institutions, and on steps to preserve evidence and prepare witness statements when needed. We explain court procedures, potential timelines, and likely costs so clients can plan accordingly. By combining thorough preparation with proactive case management, we aim to secure a resolution that honors the decedent’s intent and reduces the emotional and financial toll on families. Contacting our office early helps ensure deadlines are met and evidence is preserved for the petition.
Our process begins with a focused intake to understand the assets, the trust documents, and the circumstances of any attempted transfers. We then gather relevant records, draft a verified petition tailored to the facts, and coordinate service to interested parties. Where possible, we seek agreement among beneficiaries to streamline court proceedings. If a hearing is necessary, we prepare concise declarations and exhibits to support the petition. Throughout, we keep clients informed about next steps, timelines, and likely outcomes so they can make confident decisions about moving forward.
The first step involves a comprehensive review of the trust instrument, deeds, account records, beneficiary forms, and any communications indicating intent. We identify documents that directly support inclusion of the asset in the trust and note any gaps that may require additional investigation. This stage also includes determining interested parties who must be notified, assessing whether alternative remedies exist, and advising on likely evidentiary needs. Thorough preparation at this stage strengthens the petition and can shorten the overall process when the matter reaches the court.
We assist clients in obtaining certified copies of deeds, account statements, and trust documents, and in preserving any relevant electronic communications or drafts. Proper preservation avoids evidentiary problems and allows us to create a coherent case narrative for the court. We also recommend obtaining written statements from individuals who can attest to the trustmaker’s intent. Careful documentation supports the petition and helps the court understand why the asset should be recognized as trust property rather than part of a probate estate.
After gathering documents, we analyze the legal strengths and potential weaknesses of filing a Heggstad petition versus pursuing other remedies. We prepare a filing strategy that includes the form of petition, required declarations, and the sequence of steps to present the evidence effectively. Where possible we attempt to resolve title issues through agreement, but when litigation is necessary we design filings with clear, concise facts and legal arguments to support the requested court determination of trust ownership.
In step two we draft the verified petition, prepare supporting declarations and exhibits, and identify all necessary parties for service. Proper service and accurate filings are essential to moving the case forward. We include documentary evidence that corroborates intent and any statements from witnesses with direct knowledge. When appropriate, we reach out to interested parties to discuss resolution possibilities before filing. This step ensures the petition is complete, legally sound, and ready for submission to the probate court when all prerequisites are met.
Declarations from witnesses and copies of relevant documents are compiled into exhibit sets that support the petition. Each declaration is carefully drafted to present facts in a persuasive, fact-based manner, avoiding argumentative language while clearly demonstrating intent. Exhibits are organized for easy reference by the court and opposing parties. Well-assembled declarations and exhibits help judges understand the factual basis for recognizing the asset as trust property and reduce the need for extensive additional discovery.
Once the petition is ready, we ensure proper service on all interested parties and pursue early resolution efforts where feasible. This includes offering to share evidence and explaining the legal basis for the petition, which sometimes leads to agreements that limit litigation. If parties are receptive, agreed procedures can be proposed to the court. If not, the case proceeds with scheduled hearings and prepared testimony. Early outreach often reduces conflict and fosters a cooperative approach to resolving title issues.
The final stage involves presenting the petition at hearing, responding to any objections, and obtaining a court order that recognizes the asset as trust property if the facts support the request. We prepare concise oral and written arguments and assist witnesses in providing clear, admissible testimony. After a favorable ruling, we take steps to implement the court’s order, such as recording corrected deeds or notifying financial institutions so the trustee can manage the asset under the trust. Ensuring proper implementation finalizes the transfer and protects beneficiary interests.
Preparing for a hearing includes rehearsing witness statements, organizing exhibits for quick reference, and developing focused legal points that highlight the trustmaker’s intent. We aim to present a clear narrative supported by documents that answer likely questions from the court. Effective presentation at the hearing increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling and helps reduce post-judgment challenges. We also prepare contingency plans if objections arise so responses are ready and grounded in the evidence compiled during earlier stages.
After obtaining a court order, we assist with recording necessary documents, updating account registrations, and notifying institutions so trustees can exercise authority over the asset. This implementation step closes the loop by ensuring that the court’s determination is reflected in public records and institution files. Proper follow-through prevents future disputes and ensures that the trust terms govern management and distribution of the asset. Trustees receive guidance on complying with the court order and on fulfilling fiduciary duties when administering the property.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used in California to ask the probate court to recognize property as trust property when the formal title does not reflect the trust but the decedent clearly intended the asset to fund the trust. The petition relies on evidence such as the trust document, related writings, draft deeds, account records, or witness statements that together demonstrate the transferor’s intent. If the court is persuaded, it can declare the asset belongs to the trust, allowing the trustee to manage or distribute the property according to the trust terms. This remedy is typically used when an attempted transfer was incomplete or defective, such as a deed left in the decedent’s name or accounts not retitled. It is not suitable for every situation; the strength of documentary evidence and the absence of conflicting claims are important. The petition process involves preparing verified pleadings, serving interested parties, and presenting supporting evidence to the court at a hearing where the judge will consider whether the facts warrant recognition of trust ownership.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the facts, how quickly evidence can be gathered, and whether interested parties contest the petition. In straightforward, uncontested cases, the process can move relatively quickly once documents are assembled and the petition is filed. Timeframes depend on court schedules and any required periods for service and response, which can extend the process by weeks or months in some situations. When disputes arise or additional discovery is necessary, the matter can take longer as parties exchange information and attend hearings. Factors such as locating witnesses, obtaining certified records, and coordinating with title companies or financial institutions can also add time. Early preparation and clear evidence typically shorten the path to a hearing and resolution, while contested proceedings require more extensive case management and court attention.
Supporting a Heggstad petition requires assembling documents and statements that collectively show the decedent’s intent to place the asset in the trust. Key items may include the trust instrument, draft or signed deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations that align with the trust, correspondence indicating intent, and witness declarations from individuals with personal knowledge of the trustmaker’s wishes. Certified copies of public records and bank or investment statements strengthen the factual record. In addition to documents, sworn declarations from witnesses and trustees help explain the circumstances and intentions surrounding the transfer. Organized exhibits that tie the documents to specific legal points are important for judges who will review the petition. The more consistent and contemporaneous the evidence, the stronger the petition will appear to the court and the greater the chance of favorable recognition of trust ownership.
A Heggstad petition can sometimes allow specific assets to be recognized as trust property without the need for full probate administration, which means those assets may be administered and distributed under the trust rather than through probate. When the evidence is clear and uncontested, the petition can effectively bring title into the trust and reduce the scope of probate for the estate. However, the petition applies to the specific assets at issue and does not automatically replace a full probate process for other estate matters that require court oversight. If multiple assets or broader estate administration issues exist, probate may still be necessary for those aspects. Also, if parties contest the petition or disputes about the trust arise, the case can become more complex and require additional court proceedings. The petition is a focused tool that can be very effective for particular title problems, but its ability to avoid probate depends on the overall estate circumstances and whether additional issues require court involvement.
When filing a Heggstad petition, you must identify and serve all interested parties who have a legal stake in the asset or the estate. This typically includes beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs at law, named successors, and sometimes creditors or other claimants. Proper service is required so that parties have the opportunity to respond or contest the petition if they believe it is unwarranted. Failing to serve interested parties properly can delay the case and potentially invalidate court action if later challenged. The probate court provides rules for notice and service that must be followed. In some instances, additional parties may need to be noticed, such as financial institutions holding accounts or title companies involved with real property. Identifying and serving all required parties early helps avoid procedural challenges and makes the court process smoother, reducing the risk of further delays or litigation over inadequate notice.
If someone contests a Heggstad petition, the matter moves from a largely documentary filing into contested probate proceedings where witnesses may be examined, and additional evidence may be produced. Contesting parties can present alternative evidence about ownership or intent, and the court will weigh the competing proofs. Contested matters often require more time for discovery, depositions, and hearings, and may result in negotiated settlements or court rulings after full consideration of the facts. When a contest occurs, it is important to maintain organized documentation and be prepared to support sworn testimony. Negotiation and mediation can sometimes resolve disputes without prolonged litigation. If litigation continues, the court will make determinations based on the preponderance of evidence presented. Preparing thoroughly and anticipating likely challenges strengthens the position of the party seeking recognition of trust ownership.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include attempting to correct title through a corrective deed or retitling while living parties are able to sign necessary documents, negotiating agreements among beneficiaries, or using small estate procedures when appropriate. When living trustees or co-owners can effectuate a change directly, that can be faster and less expensive than court action. However, these alternatives are not always feasible if the owner is deceased or if third-party institutions require a court order to change title. Mediation or settlement discussions may resolve disputes without formal court intervention, particularly when parties are willing to cooperate and when the facts are not heavily disputed. Consulting about available alternatives helps determine whether a petition is the most efficient route or whether corrective steps outside of court are viable given the circumstances and the needs of the trust and beneficiaries.
Costs for pursuing a Heggstad petition vary depending on the complexity of the case, whether the matter is contested, and the amount of documentary work and court appearances required. Expenses include court filing fees, costs for obtaining certified records, and professional fees related to preparing the petition and supporting declarations. Uncontested matters with clear evidence can be more economical, while contested proceedings increase time and expense due to discovery, depositions, and hearings. We discuss likely costs during initial consultations and provide guidance on ways to manage expenses through focused preparation and early settlement efforts when possible. Understanding the potential costs upfront helps families weigh the value of pursuing the petition against alternative approaches and make informed decisions about proceeding in a way that best protects estate interests.
When a court grants a Heggstad petition, the order can be used to correct public records, such as recording a new deed reflecting the trust’s title or providing account custodians with a court order to change registration. These implementation steps ensure the court’s determination is reflected in the documents that third parties rely upon. Proper recording and notification to institutions finalize the title correction so trustees can manage and distribute the asset under the trust terms without further questions about ownership. Implementation may require additional administrative steps with title companies, banks, or investment firms to ensure records are updated. We assist clients with these post-judgment tasks to confirm that public records and institutional files align with the court’s ruling. Taking these steps promptly prevents future disputes and ensures the trustee can carry out their fiduciary duties with clear authority over the asset.
To begin the Heggstad petition process in Biola, start by collecting trust documents, deeds, account records, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that indicates the decedent’s intent. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to arrange an initial review so we can assess the strength of the evidence and recommend next steps. Early review helps identify missing documents and potential interested parties who must be served when a petition is filed. During the initial consultation we will outline a plan for gathering remaining records, obtaining witness statements, and preparing a verified petition for court filing. We will also explain expected timelines, potential costs, and whether early outreach to other parties might facilitate resolution. Prompt action to preserve evidence and get started increases the likelihood of a favorable and timely outcome.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas