A Heggstad petition in California addresses the transfer and clarification of property intended to belong to a living trust when title was not properly transferred. For Clovis residents, filing a petition can avoid lengthy probate delays and make sure assets move according to trust terms. This page explains the petition process, typical timelines, and what information is needed to present clear evidence that the asset was intended to be trust property. If you own a trust or are administering one, understanding this proceeding helps protect beneficiaries and supports a smoother distribution of assets without unnecessary court complications.
Many families discover post-incident that certain assets were never retitled into a trust even though the trust maker intended that outcome. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that the asset should be treated as trust property and distributed under the trust. In Clovis and Fresno County matters, the petition requires documentation, affidavits, and a clear statement of intent. This discussion covers what evidence typically persuades a judge, how the process fits into broader estate planning goals, and practical steps families can take to reduce delays and uncertainty for heirs and beneficiaries.
A properly handled Heggstad petition rescues the trust maker’s intentions from administrative oversights and ensures that assets not retitled still follow the trust’s distribution rules. The process can prevent assets from entering formal probate, reduce administration time, and preserve privacy by limiting public court involvement. For families in Clovis, resolving title issues through a petition can also reduce conflict among heirs by providing a judicial determination of ownership. This approach commonly leads to more predictable outcomes for beneficiaries, allows trustees to carry out their duties with greater clarity, and avoids the added expense and delay of full probate administration.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning services tailored to California law, including assistance with petitions related to trust asset transfers. Our team focuses on careful review of trust documents, property records, and supporting evidence to prepare petitions that reflect the trust maker’s intent. We handle matters involving revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related documents such as powers of attorney and health care directives. For Clovis clients, we combine local court knowledge with practical guidance to move matters forward efficiently while keeping families informed at every step.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a judge to determine that property should have been held by a trust even though title was not transferred. The petition must show convincing evidence of the decedent’s or trust maker’s intent, which may include trust language, correspondence, beneficiary designations, and the circumstances of acquisition. The process typically involves drafting a formal petition, serving interested parties, and presenting supporting documentation. For many families, this procedure resolves ownership questions and allows property to be distributed under the trust rather than through probate administration in Fresno County.
When preparing a petition, it is important to gather authoritative documents such as the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and any written instructions from the trust maker. Courts look for a consistent pattern indicating the trust maker intended the asset to be part of the trust. Depositions or declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals may strengthen the record. In Clovis matters, familiarity with local probate calendars and procedural rules helps streamline filing, notification, and hearing scheduling, so the petition proceeds with minimal delay for the parties involved.
A Heggstad petition requests the probate court to find that specific property was intended to be held in trust despite not having formal title changes recorded. It relies on evidence that the trust maker intended the asset to be part of the trust, which allows the trustee to distribute the property according to trust terms. By establishing this status in court, beneficiaries can receive their interests without a full probate process. The petition is an important procedural tool in estate administration when administrative oversights or timing issues left assets improperly titled at the time of death or trust funding.
A successful petition presents a clear narrative supported by documentation and witness statements that the asset was meant to be in the trust. Essential elements include a copy of the trust instrument, proof of intent such as letters or account names, property records, and declarations from trustees or individuals with direct knowledge. The petition must be drafted to comply with probate rules and to notify interested parties. Preparing these materials carefully reduces the chance of contested hearings and helps judges evaluate ownership questions efficiently, leading to a judicial determination that aligns with the trust maker’s intentions.
Understanding the specialized vocabulary used in trust litigation and probate administration helps families follow the process and make informed decisions. This glossary covers terms you are likely to encounter when pursuing a Heggstad petition, including trust-related documents and courtroom terms. Clear definitions enable trustees and beneficiaries to prepare the proper documentation and respond to procedural requirements from the probate court. Knowing these terms also aids in communicating with professionals and understanding filings and orders issued by the court throughout the petition process.
A Heggstad petition is a petition filed in probate court to determine whether specific property should be treated as trust property even though formal title has not been changed. The petition requires evidence showing the trust maker intended the property to be held by the trust. Courts evaluate documents, statements, and circumstantial facts to reach a decision. Successful petitions allow trustees to administer and distribute the property under the trust, avoiding broader probate proceedings and helping beneficiaries receive their distributions in accordance with the trust’s terms.
The trust instrument is the written document that creates and governs a trust, setting out the settlor’s instructions for management, distribution, and trustee powers. It typically names beneficiaries, describes assets, and provides guidance for trustees’ duties. When a Heggstad petition is filed, the trust instrument is a central piece of evidence showing the settlor’s intention regarding particular assets. Courts analyze the instrument’s language alongside other records to determine whether an asset should be considered part of the trust estate for administration and distribution purposes.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring ownership of assets into the name of the trust so that the trust holds legal title. Funding typically involves retitling real property, transferring account ownership, or designating beneficiary forms to align with the trust. When assets were not retitled before the trust maker’s death, a Heggstad petition may be used to demonstrate intent and confirm that those assets should be treated as trust property. Proper funding avoids complications and reduces the need for court intervention after the trust maker’s death.
A declaration or affidavit is a written statement made under penalty of perjury that recounts facts, observations, or knowledge relevant to a legal matter. In a Heggstad petition, declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals can provide critical context on how and why an asset was intended to be part of the trust. These statements help the court evaluate the credibility of intent and the circumstances surrounding ownership, and they are often used alongside documentary evidence to support the petition.
When assets are improperly titled, families face different paths: filing a Heggstad petition, initiating probate, or pursuing other remedies such as title corrections or beneficiary claims. A petition specifically targets judicial confirmation that assets belong to the trust, which can be faster and less intrusive than full probate. Probate addresses estate distribution when assets are in the decedent’s name and no effective trust covers them. Evaluating the right path requires reviewing asset types, timelines, potential disputes, and the paperwork available to show intent, so the most efficient route can be selected for the family’s circumstances.
A targeted petition is often appropriate when a single asset or a small group of items was clearly intended to be in the trust but never retitled. In these situations, documentary evidence and personal statements frequently provide a clear picture of intent, allowing the court to rule without opening a full probate estate. This approach focuses legal work on the specific issue, reducing procedural complexity and time. It helps trustees move to distribution more quickly, preserves privacy, and minimizes the administrative burden for families who simply need confirmation of ownership for limited assets.
When beneficiaries and heirs are in general agreement about the trust maker’s intent, a Heggstad petition can resolve the technical title defect without prolonged litigation. Courts appreciate clear, uncontested presentations of evidence demonstrating that property belonged to the trust. In these cases, parties often prefer a streamlined petition because it avoids wider probate administration and reduces visibility into personal affairs. With cooperation, the petition process can complete quickly and allow trustees to distribute assets per the trust, maintaining family relationships and limiting court time and expense.
A broader legal approach is often warranted when many assets are affected, ownership is disputed, or the property titles are complex. In such situations, more extensive document review, potential discovery, and a wider notice to creditors and heirs may be necessary. These complexities can require more detailed pleadings and strategic decisions to protect the trust and beneficiaries. Handling multiple matters at once tends to involve careful planning and coordination, which helps ensure that contested issues are resolved and that the overall estate administration proceeds in a cohesive and legally sound manner.
When beneficiaries or potential heirs challenge the trust or claim ownership of assets, a comprehensive approach is often necessary to address disputes and protect the integrity of the trust administration. Such cases may require formal discovery, evidentiary hearings, or negotiation to resolve competing claims. Courts will weigh the evidence and legal arguments carefully, and a full strategy helps ensure the trustee’s actions are legally defensible. Managing disputes effectively helps limit delays and may prevent protracted litigation that drains estate resources and increases emotional strain on families.
A comprehensive legal approach provides a full review of documents, careful attention to procedural requirements, and strategies to reduce the risk of future challenges. For estates with complex asset structures or potential conflicts, this level of service helps ensure that all issues are addressed proactively. It can provide stronger legal protection for trustees and beneficiaries alike, clarifying title and distribution plans. Comprehensive planning also helps identify ancillary tasks such as beneficiary form updates and title transfers that prevent similar issues from arising in the future.
Thorough representation can yield long-term benefits by resolving ownership disputes and aligning asset titles with the trust’s terms for a lasting outcome. A detailed process tends to reduce the chance of appeals, further litigation, or subsequent claims that could reopen matters. For families, that translates into more efficient distribution, better preservation of estate value, and a clearer path forward for trustees. Taking the time to address every relevant matter at the outset often results in a more stable and predictable resolution for all parties involved.
When legal issues are addressed thoroughly, the estate is less vulnerable to later disputes that can reopen administration and create new expenses. Comprehensive procedures typically include careful documentation and notice to interested parties so that claims are surfaced early and evaluated promptly. This reduces the chance of surprises after assets have been distributed. For trustees and beneficiaries, fewer post-distribution problems mean less stress and lower costs, preserving the estate’s value and helping families move forward with confidence that the trust maker’s wishes were honored.
A comprehensive approach helps establish clear title for assets, which is essential for efficient transfer and distribution under the trust. By resolving ownership ambiguities and addressing related documentation issues, trustees can proceed with confidence when distributing property. This clarity benefits beneficiaries and reduces administrative delays that can arise from unresolved title matters. Ultimately, ensuring that records and court orders align with trust instructions promotes a smoother process for transferring assets and finalizing estate matters in a timely and orderly fashion.
Start by collecting the trust document, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, letters, and any written instructions that demonstrate the trust maker’s intention. Early organization of records makes the petition preparation more efficient and increases the clarity of the evidence presented to the court. Attention to details such as dates, names on accounts, and transaction histories supports the argument that an asset belonged to the trust. This preparation can shorten the timeline, reduce misunderstandings among heirs, and provide a solid foundation for the petition filing and any supporting declarations.
Affidavits or declarations that detail the circumstances of title and the trust maker’s intent are often essential to a petition. Gather statements from trustees, family members, or professionals who have firsthand knowledge of the trust maker’s actions and decisions. Combine these statements with documentary proof such as account names, deeds, or correspondence to create a coherent presentation. Solid supporting evidence helps the court understand the context and increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling, making it possible to administer the trust assets according to the trust’s directions.
Families and trustees commonly pursue a petition when assets were intended for a trust but remain in the decedent’s name due to oversight, timing, or administrative error. This situation can arise with real estate, bank accounts, retirement benefits, and smaller personal property items. A petition helps align legal title with the trust maker’s clear intentions, enabling trustees to distribute property in accordance with the trust. Seeking a judicial determination helps prevent assets from becoming entangled in probate proceedings and minimizes delays and added costs associated with estate administration.
Another frequent reason to seek a petition is to reduce family disagreement by obtaining a court ruling that confirms ownership and distribution plans. When beneficiaries have questions about whether particular property should be part of the trust, a judicial finding provides clarity and finality. A petition can also be used to address assets acquired shortly before death or transferred informally in a way that does not clearly change title. In those cases, the petition process brings documentation and testimony together so that distributions can proceed according to the trust maker’s intent.
Circumstances commonly prompting a petition include newly acquired property that was never retitled, assets bought with trust funds but left in the decedent’s name, or paperwork errors in deed or account names. Life transitions such as relocations, last-minute purchases, or changing financial institutions can create title gaps. Emotional stress while finalizing estate tasks can also lead to oversights. A petition helps correct those gaps by presenting evidence that the trust maker intended the property to be held by the trust, allowing administration and distribution to align with the trust’s provisions.
A frequent scenario involves real estate that was purchased or meant to be transferred into the trust but was never recorded in the trust’s name. This might occur when refinancing, during a move, or because of an administrative oversight. A Heggstad petition can be used to show the settlor’s intent that the property be part of the trust and to obtain a judicial finding that permits the trustee to distribute or manage the property according to the trust terms. This remedy prevents unnecessary full probate and clarifies ownership for all parties.
Bank accounts, brokerage accounts, or investment holdings sometimes remain in the settlor’s name despite being intended for the trust. This can happen when institutions require particular forms or when transfers occur shortly before the settlor’s death. By filing a petition and submitting account statements, beneficiary designations, and related records, trustees can demonstrate that the asset should be administered under the trust. Clarifying these issues reduces the administrative burden and ensures that distributions follow the settlor’s plan rather than intestacy or probate schedules.
When assets are acquired near the time of death—such as a recently purchased vehicle, real estate, or an inheritance that was placed into an individual name—a petition can show that the trust maker intended those items to be part of the trust. The timing of acquisition can be explained through purchase documents, bank transfers, or correspondence, and the court will weigh that evidence in determining ownership. This process helps trustees bring recently acquired property into the trust administration and distribute it consistent with the trust’s instructions.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists Clovis and Fresno County residents with petitions and other trust administration tasks. We help gather documentation, prepare filings, and navigate local probate procedures to pursue a judicial determination that property belongs to a trust. Our goal is to reduce delay and uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries. By working to present clear evidence and follow court rules, the firm supports families through the procedural steps so property can be managed or distributed according to the trust maker’s clear intentions while minimizing unnecessary court involvement.
The firm brings focused knowledge of California trust and probate procedures, assisting clients with document assembly, strategic filings, and court presentation for Heggstad petitions. We work to identify the strongest forms of proof for each case and prepare clear, organized submissions that the court can evaluate efficiently. For families who want to resolve title issues and proceed with trust administration, our approach emphasizes thorough preparation and practical guidance, so matters move forward with clarity and minimized procedural risk in Fresno County courts.
Our services include reviewing trust instruments, locating supporting documents, preparing declarations, and handling required notices to interested parties. We coordinate with trustees, beneficiaries, and third parties to build a factual record that demonstrates intent and supports the petition. Attention to detail in these preparatory steps often leads to smoother hearings or uncontested outcomes. The objective is to obtain a judicial determination that aligns with the trust maker’s wishes while avoiding unnecessary expense or delay for families during a sensitive time.
We also guide clients through post-order steps such as recording appropriate documents and assisting trustees with implementing distributions consistent with the court’s decision. Helping families understand the implications of an order and offering practical next steps for property transfers, account retitling, and beneficiary notifications supports finalization of the trust administration. The aim is to provide dependable procedural support that leads to resolution and allows beneficiaries to receive their distributions without prolonged uncertainty.
Our process begins with a careful intake to identify the asset, review the trust document, and locate supporting evidence such as deeds, account records, or correspondence. We then prepare required pleadings, declarations, and notices while coordinating service on interested parties. The firm files the petition with the appropriate Fresno County court and monitors calendars and procedural deadlines. If a hearing is required, we present the documentation and legal arguments. After a court ruling, we assist with any recording, title transfers, or distribution steps needed to implement the decision.
The first step involves compiling trust documents, property records, transaction histories, and any communications that indicate the trust maker’s intent. We assess whether the material is sufficient to present a persuasive case to the court and identify any gaps needing further investigation. During this phase, we also determine the interested parties who must be notified and discuss the likely timeline. A careful assessment reduces the risk of procedural errors and helps create a clear plan for preparing the petition and supporting declarations.
Collecting the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and related records establishes the factual foundation for a petition. We review the trust language for directives about asset ownership and confirm whether any related documents or beneficiary designations support the claim. Accurate title searches and documentation of transfers help demonstrate that the trust maker intended the asset to be included. Firm attention to these details ensures the petition is backed by coherent evidence that judges can analyze effectively during the review process.
Declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals who recall the trust maker’s instructions are often necessary to provide context and confirm intent. We identify appropriate witnesses, draft clear declarations, and coordinate signatures and notarization where required. These statements are designed to complement documentary evidence and help explain the circumstances that led to title discrepancies. Well-crafted declarations enhance the overall presentation and give the court a full picture of the trust maker’s actions and intentions regarding specific assets.
After gathering evidence and declarations, we prepare the formal petition and supporting exhibits consistent with probate court rules. This includes drafting clear factual statements, legal arguments, and the proposed order for the court to sign. Properly documenting service on interested parties and ensuring compliance with notice requirements are critical for the petition to move forward. Accurate filing and careful adherence to procedural rules reduce the risk of continuances or technical challenges, helping the matter advance toward resolution in an orderly way.
We assemble the petition with a concise narrative, attach supporting exhibits such as the trust instrument and title documents, and include declarations explaining the facts. The petition identifies all interested persons and sets out the relief requested. Organizing exhibits clearly and cross-referencing declarations with documentary evidence helps the judge evaluate the claim efficiently. Attention to exhibit preparation reduces confusion at the hearing and supports a timely judicial determination consistent with the trust maker’s intent for the subject asset.
Proper service on beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties is essential. We prepare and execute notices required by probate rules and handle any follow-up if parties raise questions or objections. If disputes arise, we work to clarify issues and, where appropriate, negotiate resolutions or prepare for contested hearings. Addressing concerns early and maintaining organized records of service helps ensure the petition proceeds without unnecessary procedural setbacks, and it positions the matter for the most efficient resolution possible.
Once the petition is heard, the court will evaluate the evidence and may enter an order determining whether the asset is trust property. If the court grants relief, we assist trustees with implementing the order by recording documents, retitling assets, and coordinating distribution under the trust. If additional steps are required, such as resolving competing claims or clarifying title records, we help manage those tasks to achieve finality. Post-order work ensures that the court’s decision translates smoothly into practical actions for trustees and beneficiaries.
At the hearing, the court reviews the petition, exhibits, and declarations, and may ask questions about the evidence and intent. The judge will weigh the factual record and legal standards applicable to trust ownership disputes. A clear, organized presentation helps the court reach a determination efficiently. If the court finds sufficient proof, it will issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property and directing the trustee on appropriate distribution or management consistent with the trust instrument.
After obtaining an order, practical steps include recording the order with the county recorder if real property is involved, retitling accounts, and distributing assets per the trust instructions. We assist trustees with these tasks, prepare necessary documentation, and confirm that actions are completed to prevent future disputes. Closing the matter in an organized way helps beneficiaries receive their distributions and ensures trust administration is concluded with a clear record of the court’s decision and the steps taken to implement it.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to determine that specific property should be treated as trust property despite not being formally retitled. It is used when the trust maker intended assets to belong to the trust but administrative oversights or timing issues left title in the individual’s name. The petition relies on documentary evidence and declarations to show intent and ownership context so the trustee can administer the asset under the trust. The court’s determination allows distribution in accordance with the trust’s terms rather than requiring full probate proceedings. Filing a petition is typically appropriate when evidence shows a clear intention for trust ownership but technical transfer steps were not completed. The petition focuses on identifying the asset, presenting supporting documents, and asking the judge for an order recognizing trust ownership. This process can be less burdensome than opening a full estate probate when the matter concerns a limited set of assets that fit within the trust maker’s intent.
Timelines vary depending on the completeness of documentation, whether interested parties contest the petition, and the court’s schedule. In uncontested matters with clear evidence, the process may move more quickly and conclude within a matter of weeks to a few months. When additional discovery or hearings are needed due to disputes or missing records, the timeline can extend and may take several months to resolve. Familiarity with local probate calendars and procedural requirements helps shorten delays where possible. Preparation and early organization of documents are key to a faster process. Prompt notice to interested parties and readiness to respond to questions or objections can prevent continuances. Working proactively to fill evidentiary gaps often reduces the need for extended hearings and helps the petition advance efficiently toward a judicial determination and the subsequent steps needed for distribution or title adjustments.
Courts find documentary evidence such as the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, and written communications particularly persuasive when assessing a petition. Declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals who understood the trust maker’s intentions also provide valuable context. Together, these materials create a coherent narrative that supports the claim that the asset was intended to be trust property. Clear documentation of transactions and the circumstances surrounding title further strengthens the petition. Consistency among the papers and corroborating testimony increases credibility. Showing a consistent pattern—such as use of trust funds to purchase an asset or repeated statements by the trust maker about intended ownership—helps the court view the petition favorably. Organizing exhibits and matching declarations to specific documents streamlines the court’s review and makes the determination more straightforward.
A successful Heggstad petition can allow a trustee to treat the property as trust property and thus avoid including it in a full probate estate for distribution purposes. However, the petition addresses title status for specific assets and does not substitute for probate when other estate matters require administration. Whether probate is avoided altogether depends on the nature and extent of untitled assets and other estate liabilities. Each case requires review to determine whether a petition is sufficient or if probate remains necessary for other issues. If multiple assets or creditor claims are present, additional steps beyond a petition may be required. The court may still require certain notices or procedural acts to protect interested parties. Evaluating the entire estate’s profile helps determine whether the petition alone will meet the family’s goals or whether coordinated probate actions are needed to resolve remaining legal obligations.
Notice requirements vary by statute and court rule, but generally interested parties include beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs who would inherit under intestacy rules, and potential creditors in some situations. Proper notice ensures that those with legal interests have an opportunity to object or participate in the proceeding. Failure to provide required notice can result in delays or the need to re-serve parties, so attending to notice rules early in the process is important for an efficient outcome. Identifying all necessary recipients and documenting service helps prevent later challenges based on procedural grounds. The petition should list interested persons and include proof that notices were sent and received as required. Clear communication with beneficiaries and heirs can also reduce the likelihood of objections and contribute to a smoother court process.
Yes, beneficiaries or other interested parties may oppose a Heggstad petition if they believe the property should not be treated as trust property or if they have competing claims. Opposition may raise factual disputes about intent or procedural issues such as inadequate notice. When opposition arises, the court may schedule additional hearings, require further evidence, or direct discovery to resolve contested matters. Preparing comprehensive documentation and responding promptly to objections helps address disputes efficiently. When disagreements occur, the court evaluates all evidence and may consider written declarations, testimony, and documentary exhibits. Resolving conflicts early through discussion or mediation may avoid protracted litigation, but when necessary the hearing process allows the judge to make a binding determination regarding ownership and distribution under the trust instrument.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the asset remains in its recorded status and may be subject to other proceedings, including probate distribution if the property is in the decedent’s name. A denial typically reflects insufficient evidence to show the settlor intended the asset for the trust, procedural defects, or unresolved disputes. When a petition is denied, the parties may review their options, which could include gathering additional evidence, pursuing alternative legal remedies, or initiating probate if necessary to administer the property under estate rules. After a denial, it is important to consider the reasons provided by the court and to evaluate next steps calmly. Sometimes supplemental filings or additional documentation can address deficiencies, while other situations require different procedural paths. Careful legal planning at that point helps determine a sound route for protecting beneficiaries’ interests and completing estate administration.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include private resolution among beneficiaries, negotiating title corrections with institutions, or pursuing probate administration depending on the circumstances. In some cases, financial institutions will accept additional documentation or affidavits to retitle accounts without court intervention. When parties are cooperative, transferring property through mutual agreement and updated records can be quicker and less formal than seeking a judicial determination. However, when institutions refuse to accept informal documentation or when disputes exist, a petition may be the most reliable method to obtain a clear legal ruling. Evaluating alternatives requires reviewing the asset type, the willingness of interested parties to cooperate, and institutional policies that may affect transferability without court action.
Costs vary based on the complexity of the petition, the need for discovery or contested hearings, and court filing fees. Uncontested matters with clear documentation tend to be less costly, while contested petitions, additional investigations, or extended hearings increase time and expense. Costs also reflect work required for document gathering, preparation of declarations, service of process, and any required appearances before the court. Discussing likely expenses up front helps families plan and make informed decisions about the most efficient path forward. Some clients may be able to reduce costs by organizing records early and communicating clearly with other interested parties. Transparent expectations about timing and possible outcomes also help avoid surprises. If budget concerns exist, discussing phased approaches or prioritizing key assets can provide practical options to move matters forward while controlling costs.
Before meeting to discuss a petition, collect the trust document, deeds, account statements, purchase records, correspondence that references the trust, and any beneficiary designation forms. Having clear copies of these items allows a quicker assessment of whether a petition is likely to succeed and what additional records might be needed. Also prepare a timeline of events and a list of potential witnesses who can speak to the trust maker’s intent, as that information will assist in drafting declarations and organizing evidence. Providing contact information for beneficiaries and any institutions involved can further streamline the process. Early organization helps reduce the time needed for fact-finding and allows the focus to remain on assembling the most persuasive materials for the court. Being prepared translates to more efficient case assessment and faster movement toward resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas