If you are considering changes to a trust in Easton, California, a trust modification petition can be the legal path to update terms, trustees, beneficiaries, or administrative provisions. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we help clients understand how state law, trust language, and family circumstances interact when seeking modifications. Whether the trust was created recently or many years ago, careful planning and clear legal filings can protect your goals and reduce the risk of disputes. We work with clients to clarify objectives and outline potential outcomes under California courts and statutes.
Deciding to pursue a trust modification petition often comes after life changes such as remarriage, divorce, death of a beneficiary, relocation, or changes in tax and financial circumstances. A petition is a formal request to the probate or superior court in Fresno County to approve adjustments to trust terms when the trust itself does not provide a straightforward mechanism for amendment. Our approach emphasizes clear communication about timing, likely procedures, and the evidence needed to support requested changes while keeping your family’s privacy and long-term planning goals in focus.
A trust modification petition can preserve assets, reduce future litigation, and ensure that a trust continues to reflect current intentions and circumstances. By legally updating trust terms through the court process, you establish an official record of the changes and reduce ambiguity among heirs and fiduciaries. This process can address unforeseen issues such as outdated distribution schemes, removal or replacement of trustees, and conditions that are no longer applicable. Taking action through a petition helps create clarity, protects beneficiaries’ interests, and aligns the trust with contemporary financial and family realities in Fresno County.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Easton and throughout Fresno County with focused trust and estate planning services. Our team guides clients through trust-related petitions with attention to court procedures, evidentiary requirements, and the importance of preserving family relationships. We prioritize responsive communication, careful preparation of filings, and practical strategies for negotiations with co-trustees or beneficiaries when disputes arise. Our practice integrates estate planning documents such as revocable living trusts, wills, powers of attorney, and advance health care directives to create coordinated solutions tailored to each client’s circumstances.
A trust modification petition asks the court to approve changes to an existing trust when the trust document itself does not authorize the requested amendment or when circumstances make a unilateral change impractical. In California the court evaluates petitions by considering the trust language, the settlor’s intent, and equitable factors. Common grounds include ambiguity in the trust, mistakes in drafting, changed circumstances that frustrate the trust’s purpose, or the settlor’s later intent that cannot be implemented solely by trustee action. Understanding procedural timelines and evidentiary needs is essential to pursuing a successful petition.
The petition process typically involves preparing a detailed motion, gathering supporting declarations, providing notice to interested parties, and attending a hearing if contested. Courts may grant modifications that preserve the original intent of the trust while addressing contemporary needs. Petitioners must present persuasive documentation about why the change serves the trust’s purpose and benefits beneficiaries. A thoughtful approach includes exploring alternatives such as trustee consent or mutual agreement among beneficiaries before resorting to formal court proceedings, which can be more time-consuming and publicly accessible.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the probate or superior court seeking judicial approval to alter the terms of an existing trust. It is used when the trust instrument does not permit the requested change, when the settlor is unable to sign an amendment, or when there are contested facts about intent or capacity. The court’s role is to interpret the trust, resolve ambiguities, and authorize alterations that align with the settlor’s original objectives where feasible. Petitioners should be prepared to explain why less intrusive alternatives are insufficient and how the requested modification serves the trust’s overarching purpose.
Successful petitions typically include a clear statement of the requested modification, supporting facts about the settlor’s intent or changed circumstances, and evidence of notice to beneficiaries and trustees. The filing package may require declarations from individuals with relevant knowledge, copies of the original trust document and related instruments, and proposed revised trust language. Courts consider whether the change preserves the settlor’s intent, whether beneficiaries are adequately protected, and whether procedural safeguards were followed. Preparing a thorough administrative record and communicating effectively with interested parties can streamline the process and reduce conflict.
Understanding key terms helps demystify the petition process. Terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, trustee removal, and cy pres principles frequently arise in petitions. Knowing the difference between a revocable living trust and an irrevocable arrangement, and recognizing procedural steps like notice and hearing requirements, is important. This glossary provides plain-language definitions to help clients follow filings and court rulings. Clear terminology empowers clients to participate in decisions about trust changes and to evaluate proposed modifications in light of California law and local Fresno County practice.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and originally funded it with assets. The settlor’s intent guides how courts interpret trust provisions, and evidence of that intent can be critical when seeking modifications. If the settlor is alive but incapacitated, courts may consider medical records or past statements to determine intent. When the settlor is deceased, the trust’s language and related documents, together with testimony from witnesses and fiduciaries, help clarify the settlor’s objectives. Understanding who the settlor is and what they intended informs any proposed adjustments.
Trustee removal is a legal action requesting that the court discharge a trustee and appoint a successor due to reasons such as breach of fiduciary duty, conflict of interest, incapacity, or a breakdown in communication that harms trust administration. Removal may accompany a trust modification petition when the trust administration itself has become untenable. Petitioners must present evidence showing why removal protects beneficiaries’ interests, along with proposed successor arrangements. Courts weigh the trustee’s conduct, the trust terms, and the potential disruption versus the benefits of appointing a new fiduciary.
A beneficiary is an individual or entity entitled to receive benefits from a trust according to the trust terms. Beneficiaries have procedural rights in a modification petition, including receiving notice and an opportunity to object. Courts consider beneficiary interests when evaluating proposed changes, especially when those changes alter distribution timing, amounts, or conditions. Beneficiaries may include family members, charities, or other designated parties, and understanding beneficiary rights helps petitioners anticipate likely responses and take steps to address reasonable concerns to reach a durable resolution.
A pour-over will directs that any assets not already transferred to the trust during the settlor’s lifetime be transferred into the trust at death. While a pour-over will complements a living trust by capturing residual assets, it does not avoid probate for assets that pass under the will. In the context of a trust modification petition, demonstrating how a pour-over will and other estate planning documents interact with the trust can clarify intended distributions and provide context for why certain changes are necessary to fulfill the settlor’s estate plan.
When considering trust changes, options include informal trustee actions, beneficiary consent, trust restatement by a living settlor, or a formal petition to court. Informal approaches may be quicker and preserve privacy, but they require agreement among motivated parties and clear authority under the trust instrument. A court petition offers a definitive legal resolution and protection when parties disagree or the trust lacks modification provisions. Deciding between options depends on the trust’s terms, the settlor’s capacity, the level of contention among stakeholders, and whether an enforceable, public order from the court is preferable to private arrangements.
A limited approach can be suitable when the trust document explicitly grants trustees the authority to make the intended change and when all beneficiaries agree in writing. In such circumstances the trustees can act under the trust terms without involving the court, preserving family privacy and saving time and expense. It is important to document beneficiary consent and maintain transparent records of any trustee action so that future disputes are less likely. Consulting with counsel to verify that the trust language supports the change protects all parties from unintended consequences.
Minor administrative updates such as correcting clerical errors, updating contact information, or clarifying administrative instructions may be handled without court intervention when authorized by trust provisions or accomplished by mutual consent. These adjustments typically do not affect beneficiaries’ fundamental rights and therefore can be completed more quickly and privately. Still, clear documentation of the correction or update is essential. For any change that affects distributions, fiduciary duties, or beneficiary interests, seeking formal approval or agreement is a prudent choice to avoid future challenges in probate court.
A comprehensive legal approach becomes necessary when trust terms are ambiguous, parties disagree about the settlor’s intent, or proposed modifications significantly alter distributions or trustee powers. In these cases a petition to the court provides a formal process for evaluating evidence, resolving disputes, and issuing an enforceable order. Courts can authorize changes that reconcile the trust document with the settlor’s likely purpose while protecting beneficiary rights. Preparing a well-documented petition helps demonstrate the need for modification and supports a favorable judicial determination.
When there are allegations of trustee misconduct, breaches of fiduciary duty, or entrenched conflicts among beneficiaries, engaging in a comprehensive legal strategy is important to protect trust assets and preserve fair administration. A court can remove or replace trustees, impose remedies, and clarify fiduciary obligations, which may be essential for restoring proper trust governance. A thorough legal approach includes collecting documentary evidence, identifying appropriate legal claims, and coordinating necessary notices and hearings to ensure that any remedial orders serve the best interests of the trust and its beneficiaries under California law.
Choosing a formal petition can bring clarity, enforceability, and finality to disputes or uncertainties about a trust. A judicial order formally records the modification and reduces the risk of later challenges by establishing the court’s reasoned findings. This route is particularly valuable when private agreements are not feasible or when competing interpretations of the trust threaten administration. A successful petition can streamline future administration and grant trustees and beneficiaries a clear framework for carrying out the settlor’s intent while protecting beneficiary rights under California statutes.
A comprehensive approach also helps to resolve latent issues such as conflicting documents, unclear successor trustee provisions, or unintended tax consequences that could complicate distributions. By involving the court, parties gain access to formal remedies and clear legal standards, which can reduce future litigation risk. The court’s oversight ensures that proposed changes balance the trust’s original purpose with present realities, promoting predictable administration. For families navigating sensitive matters, a formal resolution can provide peace of mind and a documented path forward.
One key advantage of a court-authorized modification is legal finality: the court’s order becomes part of the public record and creates a definitive legal basis for the change. This status reduces the likelihood of future disagreements and litigation by clarifying rights and responsibilities. Parties who might otherwise contest the change have a clearly established process and record to review, and trustees can rely on the court’s order when administering the trust. Legal finality provides beneficiaries and fiduciaries with confidence that the trust will operate under updated, enforceable terms.
A formal petition can include safeguards that protect vulnerable beneficiaries and preserve trust assets for their intended purpose. Courts may tailor modifications to address special needs, creditor concerns, or tax considerations while keeping distributions aligned with the settlor’s intentions. By documenting changes and implementing judicially supervised solutions, families reduce the chance that assets will be misapplied or that vulnerable beneficiaries will be left without adequate representation. This protective framework helps ensure the trust continues to serve its long-term objectives without exposing assets to undue risk.
When preparing a petition, gather all documents and communications that shed light on the settlor’s intent, including prior drafts of the trust, related estate planning documents, and contemporaneous correspondence. Medical records and declarations from individuals who interacted with the settlor can also be relevant if capacity or intent is questioned. A thorough documentary record helps the court understand why a modification is requested and can speed the decision-making process. Organize records chronologically and provide clear, factual narratives that tie documents to the requested changes.
Before filing a petition, explore whether beneficiaries and trustees can reach an agreement through negotiation or mediation, or whether the trust document allows for administrative adjustments. Informal resolution can save time and expense and preserve family relationships. If parties cannot reach a consensus, filing a petition may be the most reliable way to secure a binding resolution. Weigh the costs and benefits of each path, and prepare clear proposals and documentation that explain why a petition is the most appropriate means to achieve the necessary trust changes.
Consider a petition when the trust’s terms no longer reflect the settlor’s current intentions, when trustee misconduct is suspected, or when beneficiary circumstances have changed significantly. Examples include removing or replacing a trustee who can no longer fulfill duties, resolving ambiguous provisions that cause administration delays, or addressing tax or creditor issues that undermine the trust’s purpose. A petition can offer a binding resolution that clarifies future administration and protects beneficiaries’ interests in a structured legal setting under Fresno County procedures and California statutes.
Another reason to pursue a petition is when the settlor is incapacitated and cannot amend the trust personally but there is clear evidence of a later intent that conflicts with the written document. In such circumstances the court can evaluate evidence and permit modifications that align the trust with documented intentions. Petitioning may also be appropriate for correcting drafting mistakes or addressing events that frustrate the trust’s purpose. Taking timely action helps preserve assets and reduces the likelihood of protracted litigation among heirs and fiduciaries.
Common circumstances include the need to remove or replace a trustee, change distribution provisions due to marriage or divorce, incorporate newly acquired assets or tax planning considerations, and correct drafting errors that create ambiguity. Other triggers include the settlement of creditor claims, updated beneficiary needs such as special needs planning, or the settlor’s changed financial goals. Each situation requires careful analysis of trust language, supporting documentation, and applicable California law to determine whether a court petition is the best method for achieving a fair and durable resolution.
When a trustee becomes unable to perform duties or acts in a way that harms trust administration, beneficiaries may seek relief through a petition. The court can consider removal or replacement of the trustee and can impose remedies to protect the trust. Petitioners should compile records of trustee actions, communications, and transactions that demonstrate why intervention is necessary. Clear, documented concerns presented to the court increase the likelihood of effective relief and help ensure that trust assets are managed in accordance with the settlor’s intent and fiduciary obligations.
Life events such as remarriage, divorce, the birth of new family members, or a beneficiary’s change in financial status can create the need for trust modifications. When these changes make the original trust terms unsuitable, a petition may be used to realign the trust with current needs while protecting remaining beneficiaries. The court evaluates whether modifications are consistent with the settlor’s overarching goals and whether beneficiaries receive adequate protection. Presenting clear evidence about changed circumstances helps the court assess the fairness and necessity of the proposed changes.
Occasionally trusts contain drafting errors, ambiguous wording, or internal inconsistencies that impede proper administration. A petition can correct these problems and clarify intent to prevent future disputes. Evidence may include earlier drafts, correspondence with the settlor, or testimony about the settlor’s probable intentions. Courts are able to reform or construe trust language to reflect what the settlor intended, provided sufficient evidence supports the requested correction. Addressing errors promptly reduces administrative delays and the likelihood of contested litigation among beneficiaries.
Our firm provides tailored trust modification representation for clients in Easton and surrounding Fresno County communities. We assist with preparing petitions, serving notice, gathering supporting declarations, and representing clients at hearings if necessary. Our priority is to achieve practical results that preserve family relationships and protect assets while navigating the legal process. We explain likely timelines, costs, and potential outcomes so clients can make informed decisions. If informal resolution is possible, we help facilitate agreements; if not, we prepare diligent court filings to pursue a reliable remedy.
Clients rely on the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for careful handling of trust petitions because we focus on practical solutions that reflect family priorities and legal realities. We prepare clear, organized filing materials, gather evidence that supports the requested change, and follow local Fresno County procedures to minimize delays. Our goal is to achieve a durable outcome that protects beneficiaries and ensures the trust operates according to the settlor’s intent. We also provide guidance on how any modification interacts with related estate planning documents to maintain a coordinated plan.
We emphasize communication and manage expectations about possible outcomes and timelines for petitions. Clients receive straightforward guidance about notice requirements, potential objections, and alternatives to litigation when appropriate. We also assist with post-order implementation tasks such as updating trust records, coordinating with financial institutions, and advising trustees on administration under the revised terms. Our approach seeks to reduce uncertainty and facilitate a smooth transition to the trust’s updated framework for ongoing administration.
When a petition is necessary, we prepare focused, evidence-based filings and advocate for clear court orders that address both legal and practical concerns. We work with clients and other stakeholders to identify resolution paths and to document agreements where possible. Our firm’s familiarity with local court practices in Fresno County helps streamline procedural steps and keeps clients informed at each stage of the process. We aim to resolve disputes efficiently while safeguarding the interests and intentions of the settlor and beneficiaries.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust and related estate planning documents, followed by a client interview to gather facts about the settlor’s intent and relevant events. We then evaluate alternatives and recommend whether a petition is the most appropriate step. If a petition is pursued, we prepare all required pleadings, coordinate service and notice to interested parties, collect supporting evidence, and represent the client at any hearings. Post-order, we assist with implementing changes and updating records to reflect the court’s decision and the trust’s revised terms.
The initial assessment focuses on reviewing the trust instrument, related estate planning documents, and any available evidence of settlor intent or changed circumstances. This stage identifies potential legal grounds for modification, necessary parties to notify, and the likely approach to presenting the petition. We also identify documents such as revocable living trusts, wills, powers of attorney, and health directives that impact the overall estate plan. A careful review helps determine whether informal resolution is feasible or whether filing a petition is advisable to achieve a durable outcome.
Collecting all versions of the trust, related wills, powers of attorney, health care directives, and correspondence is essential. These materials form the basis for demonstrating intent and clarifying ambiguities. If medical or financial records are relevant to capacity or changed circumstances, we help obtain and organize them. A complete and well-organized record strengthens the petition and aids the court in understanding the requested modification in context. We work with clients to identify custodians of records and to ensure timely collection and review.
Identifying all beneficiaries, trustees, and potential interested parties is a critical early step. Accurate contact and status information ensures proper notice and helps anticipate possible objections. We review beneficiary designations, successor trustee provisions, and any prior agreements that could affect the petition. Understanding relationships among parties and potential conflicts allows us to plan a strategy that addresses foreseeable disputes and provides the court with a clear map of interested stakeholders and their legal rights.
Preparing the petition includes drafting a clear explanation of the requested modification, assembling supporting declarations and exhibits, and preparing proof of service materials. We draft proposed revised trust language when applicable and map out the legal basis for modification under California law. Filing with the appropriate Fresno County court and complying with local filing rules completes the administrative step. We then serve notice on beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties and respond to any procedural inquiries from the court to move the case forward efficiently.
Declarations from witnesses, records showing the settlor’s intent, and documentary exhibits such as prior drafts or correspondence are central to a persuasive petition. We assist clients and witnesses in preparing clear, factual declarations that explain why the modification is appropriate. Exhibits are organized and referenced precisely in the petition to make it easier for the court to review. Thoughtful preparation of this evidence helps the court evaluate the request and can reduce the likelihood of surprise objections at the hearing.
Filing the petition with the correct Fresno County court and ensuring compliance with local procedural rules is essential. We prepare and file proof of service, provide required notices to beneficiaries and interested parties, and monitor deadlines for responses or objections. Accurate and timely service prevents procedural challenges that could delay resolution. Keeping a clear record of all filings and service documents supports a smooth court process and demonstrates due diligence in pursuing the requested modification.
After filing and serving the petition, the court schedules a hearing where parties may present evidence and argument. If objections arise, we prepare responses and coordinate witness testimony. The court reviews the record and issues an order granting, denying, or modifying the requested relief. If the petition is granted, the order outlines the authorized changes and any conditions. Post-decision, we assist with implementing the order, updating trust records, and advising trustees on administering the trust under the revised terms to ensure compliance and clarity for beneficiaries.
At the hearing we present a clear and focused record that establishes why the requested modification is consistent with the settlor’s intent and necessary to achieve the trust’s purpose. Witness declarations, documentary exhibits, and legal argument are coordinated to support the petition. We anticipate and address likely objections raised by other parties and provide the court with proposed orders that reflect the requested changes. Effective presentation at hearing increases the likelihood of a clear, implementable order that guides future trust administration.
After the court issues an order, implementing the change requires updating trust records, notifying financial institutions, and ensuring trustees follow the revised terms. We provide clients with a checklist of implementation tasks and assist in preparing amended trust documents or certifications of trust if required. Clear follow-through prevents administrative errors and helps trustees carry out their duties in line with the court’s directive. Proper implementation ensures the trust operates smoothly and beneficiaries receive the intended protections and distributions.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed with the court to change the terms of an existing trust when the trust document does not allow the requested alteration or when circumstances make informal changes impractical. People consider a petition when trustee actions are insufficient, when beneficiaries disagree, or when clear evidence supports a modification that aligns the trust with the settlor’s intent. The court assesses whether the change preserves the trust’s purpose and protects beneficiaries. Deciding to file requires weighing alternatives such as trustee consent, beneficiary agreements, or restatement by a capable settlor. If parties cannot resolve matters informally, a petition provides a definitive legal path to implement necessary changes, create enforceable orders, and reduce future disputes. Preparing a strong evidentiary record and complying with notice requirements improves the petition’s prospects.
The timeline for a petition in Fresno County varies depending on case complexity, court schedules, and whether the petition is contested. Simple, uncontested petitions that proceed with beneficiary consent and clear documentation may move more quickly, while contested matters requiring hearings and additional evidence take longer. Administrative steps such as gathering records, preparing declarations, and serving notice also add time before the court can consider the matter. Local court calendars and procedural requirements influence the overall duration, and unpredictable factors like objections or requests for continuances can extend the process. Early preparation, clear documentation, and cooperative parties often lead to more efficient resolution, while contested disputes may involve multiple hearings and a correspondingly longer timeline.
Notice typically must be provided to all beneficiaries, trustees, and any parties with a direct interest in the trust. California law and local rules govern who qualifies as an interested party and the required method of service. Proper notice is essential because failure to notify interested parties can result in procedural defects or delays, and it ensures that beneficiaries have an opportunity to object or participate in the proceedings. Providing clear, timely notices and documenting service helps protect the integrity of the petition and reduces the risk of procedural challenges. In some cases additional notice to creditors, contingent beneficiaries, or governmental entities may be necessary depending on the trust’s assets and terms, so a careful review is required to identify all recipients.
Yes, courts can modify or reform trust terms after the settlor’s death when appropriate evidence demonstrates that changes are necessary to carry out the settlor’s intent or correct mistakes. When the settlor is deceased the court relies on the trust document, related estate planning materials, and admissible evidence such as prior drafts, correspondence, and testimony to determine what the settlor intended. The court seeks to honor the settlor’s goals while protecting beneficiaries’ legal rights. Post-death modifications are handled carefully to avoid undermining the settlor’s testamentary plan. The petitioner bears the burden of presenting persuasive evidence that the requested change aligns with the settlor’s purpose or corrects a drafting error. A trial or contested hearing may be necessary when parties dispute the requested relief.
Persuasive evidence often includes prior drafts of the trust or related documents, written correspondence that clarifies intent, declarations from individuals with firsthand knowledge of the settlor’s wishes, and relevant medical or financial records. Documentary evidence that shows consistent statements or actions by the settlor supporting the requested change carries weight. Organized, contemporaneous records demonstrating the settlor’s intent or the circumstances that justify a modification strengthen the petition. Witness declarations that explain interactions with the settlor, professional notes from advisors, and evidence of changed circumstances are also important. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence, so a combination of documents and credible testimony is typically the most effective way to support a petition for modification.
Alternatives to filing a petition include obtaining unanimous beneficiary consent to an amendment, relying on trustee powers under the trust instrument to implement changes, or pursuing mediation to reach a private agreement. When the trust language permits trustee action or when beneficiaries can agree, these alternatives can avoid the time and cost of court proceedings and preserve family privacy. Informal solutions should be carefully documented to reduce future disputes. However, if parties cannot reach consensus or if the trust lacks authority for the needed change, a court petition may be the most reliable option. In contested situations a petition secures a binding legal order and remedies like trustee removal or reformation that informal approaches cannot provide.
Yes, a petition can request the removal or replacement of a trustee if there is sufficient reason, such as breaches of fiduciary duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or inability to administer the trust effectively. Petitioners must present evidence showing that removal is in the best interests of the trust and its beneficiaries. The court considers the trustee’s conduct, the trust terms, and the potential disruption caused by removal before issuing relief. If removal is granted, the court can appoint a successor trustee and outline steps to transition administration while protecting trust assets. Careful documentation and a clear factual record increase the likelihood that the court will authorize removal when warranted by the circumstances.
Yes. Court petitions and orders become part of the public record, and sensitive trust matters addressed in a petition may be accessible through court filings. For clients who value privacy, exploring negotiated solutions or narrowly tailored petitions that limit public disclosure of unnecessary details can help mitigate privacy concerns. Advising clients about the public nature of court proceedings is an important part of deciding the best path forward. Even though filings are public, courts can limit disclosure of particular sensitive information in some cases, and lawyers can craft pleadings to focus on legally necessary facts while minimizing extraneous personal details. Discuss privacy concerns early to develop an approach that balances transparency with discretion.
Beneficiaries’ interests are protected through notice and the opportunity to object to the petition. California procedures require notifying interested parties so they can participate, present evidence, and assert objections. The court reviews the record and balances the requested modification against beneficiaries’ rights to ensure that changes do not unfairly prejudice any parties. When appropriate the court may impose conditions to protect beneficiaries or require additional safeguards as part of any approved modification. Legal representation, neutral mediation, and clear documentation also help protect beneficiaries’ interests by ensuring their concerns are heard and addressed. Courts aim to reach outcomes that reflect the settlor’s intent while safeguarding beneficiaries from changes that would be unjust or contrary to the trust’s purpose.
A court may deny a petition if the petitioner fails to present sufficient evidence of the settlor’s intent, if the requested change would contravene a clear trust provision, or if the modification would unfairly prejudice beneficiaries. Lack of proper notice or procedural defects can also result in denial. Courts require a persuasive factual record that justifies reform or modification in light of the trust’s language and purpose. If a petition is denied, petitioners may explore alternative remedies such as negotiation, targeted revisions by a capable settlor, or limited remedies that address discrete problems without broad changes. Careful legal preparation and a complete evidentiary record improve the chances of obtaining the court-ordered relief sought.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas