When life circumstances change, updating a trust through a trust modification petition can be necessary to reflect new intentions, family changes, or asset shifts. In Fresno and across California, a trust modification petition is a court process used when the trust document cannot be changed informally or when a trustee, beneficiary, or settlor needs judicial approval for amendments. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides clear guidance on whether a petition is appropriate, what documentation is required, and how the court evaluates requests. Our approach emphasizes careful review of trust language, relevant statutes, and the interests of all parties before filing a petition.
A trust modification petition can resolve ambiguities, remove or replace trustees, correct drafting errors, or adjust beneficiary provisions to reflect current circumstances. The petition process often involves providing notice to interested parties, preparing supporting declarations, and presenting legal grounds for modification under California trust law. For Fresno residents, understanding timelines, potential objections, and possible outcomes is essential to make an informed decision. We help clients consider alternatives, such as informal amendments or successor documents, and weigh the benefits and consequences of seeking court approval versus other planning options.
A trust modification petition can prevent future disputes, clarify administrative authority, and ensure a trust reflects the settlor’s intended distribution and management of assets. In some cases small drafting errors or changed personal circumstances could lead to significant confusion for beneficiaries and trustees. Petitioning the court for a formal modification provides a legally recognized resolution that protects the integrity of the trust and reduces the risk of later litigation. For Fresno families, obtaining a clear judicial record of the modification can be particularly helpful when dealing with financial institutions, retirement plans, or real property transfers that rely on unambiguous trust documentation.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves Fresno and surrounding communities with practical estate planning and trust administration services. Our firm focuses on providing careful legal analysis and personalized planning to help clients preserve their assets and carry out their intentions. When a trust modification petition is needed, we prioritize clear communication, thorough documentation, and protective measures that respect the rights of trustees and beneficiaries. Whether handling revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, or petitions to modify trust terms, we guide clients through procedural requirements and the likely court process while keeping their goals and family dynamics central.
A trust modification petition is a court action requesting approval to change the terms, administration, or other significant aspects of a trust where informal amendment is not available or where interested parties dispute the proposed change. California law offers specific procedures for modification, which may include petitions under Probate Code sections that deal with consent, unanticipated circumstances, or interpretation and construction issues. The petitioner must present factual and legal support demonstrating why the modification is justified, how it serves the settlor’s intent, or why it resolves an ambiguity that impairs proper trust administration.
The court evaluates trust modification petitions with attention to notice, the rights of beneficiaries, and the statutory standards that apply to the requested relief. Interested parties receive notice and may object; the court may hold hearings to consider evidence and arguments before granting or denying relief. For Fresno-based clients, local practice, calendar timelines, and the specifics of county probate procedures will influence the process. Preparing a petition typically involves gathering trust documents, financial records, declarations, and any supporting affidavits that explain the reasons for modification and the consequences for beneficiaries and trustees.
A trust modification petition asks the probate or superior court to alter a trust document when the parties cannot effectuate the change through the trust’s amendment provisions or when a legal issue prevents a straightforward revision. Common reasons include correcting drafting mistakes, removing or appointing trustees, clarifying ambiguous terms, addressing changed tax or family circumstances, or implementing a settlor’s unfulfilled intent. The petition explains the requested changes, cites the legal basis for modification, and demonstrates that the modification better reflects the settlor’s true intent or is necessary to protect trust administration and beneficiary interests.
Filing a trust modification petition typically involves several core elements: preparing a clear statement of the requested modification, assembling the trust instrument and related documents, providing notice to all interested parties, and filing supporting declarations that explain the factual basis for the change. The court may require mediation, hearings, or additional documentation to ensure beneficiaries’ rights are protected. Timely and accurate notice is essential because interested parties have the opportunity to object, and their objections can lead to contested proceedings that require evidentiary hearings and potential orders from the court.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the petition process. Trust modification petitions involve legal concepts such as settlor intent, beneficiary rights, trustee duties, and statutory authority for modification. Knowing how courts interpret trust provisions, what constitutes clear and convincing evidence when needed, and the different types of modifications available can shape expectations and strategy. This glossary section outlines the most relevant terms and practical meanings to help Fresno clients communicate effectively and make informed decisions about whether a petition is needed and what outcomes are reasonably attainable.
A settlor is the person who creates a trust and transfers assets into it with the intention that the trust terms govern management and distribution. The settlor’s documented intentions, whether expressed in the trust instrument or evident from surrounding facts and declarations, guide courts when interpreting disputed provisions or considering modifications. If the settlor is alive, their current wishes may be relevant when deciding whether to allow a modification. When the settlor is deceased, historical evidence of intent, contemporaneous documents, and the trust language itself inform the court’s review of any requested changes.
A beneficiary is an individual or entity entitled to receive benefits or distributions from a trust under its terms. Beneficiaries have legal interests that must be protected during any modification proceeding; they are typically provided notice and the opportunity to object to a proposed change. The court examines how a modification will affect beneficiaries’ rights and whether the requested change aligns with the settlor’s intentions or otherwise serves the trust’s purposes. Protecting beneficiary interests is an essential part of the court’s assessment when ruling on a petition.
A trustee is the person or entity charged with managing trust assets and carrying out the trust’s terms for the benefit of beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties to act prudently and loyally, and they may be parties to modification petitions if their authority or actions are in dispute. A petition might seek to remove a trustee, appoint a successor, or clarify trustee powers to enable proper administration. Courts consider the trustee’s conduct, qualifications, and relationship to beneficiaries when deciding whether to grant requested changes that affect managerial authority.
A Heggstad petition addresses assets that were intended to be transferred to a trust but were not properly retitled or transferred before the settlor’s death. Named after a controlling California case, such petitions seek a judicial determination that the settlor intended certain assets to be part of the trust despite imperfect transfer formalities. Filing a Heggstad petition can be necessary to ensure those assets receive trust-based disposition rather than probate distribution, and it often requires clear evidence of the settlor’s intent, such as estate planning documents, transfer attempts, and corroborating statements from the settlor or other witnesses.
When a trust needs change, clients can consider several pathways: an informal amendment or restatement (if the trust allows), a nonjudicial settlement agreement among interested parties, or a court petition when disagreement or legal barriers exist. Informal options are typically faster and less expensive but require consensus and proper authority under the trust. Nonjudicial agreements work when beneficiaries and trustees agree to terms. A trust modification petition is the formal route when agreement cannot be reached or when statutory relief or a judicial determination is necessary to resolve disputes, correct errors, or establish clear authority.
If all beneficiaries and the trustee are in agreement about a change, a limited approach such as a written amendment or a nonjudicial settlement agreement can avoid the time and expense of court proceedings. These methods require precise documentation and may still involve legal review to ensure compliance with the trust’s amendment provisions and controlling law. A clear, documented agreement can provide the same practical result as a judicial modification while preserving privacy and reducing delays associated with formal filings and public hearings in Fresno County courts.
Some trust instruments include explicit amendment procedures that enable the settlor or designated parties to make changes without court involvement. When the trust’s terms permit a straightforward amendment and the required signatories are available, following that mechanism typically provides a clear and lawful path to update provisions. It is important to confirm that amendments are executed according to the trust’s requirements and recorded where necessary to ensure third-party recognition, such as with financial institutions or title companies handling real property transfers tied to the trust.
When beneficiaries disagree with proposed changes, or when a trustee’s authority is contested, filing a trust modification petition becomes necessary to obtain a binding judicial resolution. Disputes about intent, capacity, or asset ownership often cannot be resolved informally, and the court provides a structured forum for presenting evidence, resolving objections, and issuing enforceable orders. In these situations, careful legal preparation, clear evidence, and adherence to California probate rules are essential to protect the interests of all parties and reach a sustainable, court-approved outcome.
Title defects, improperly retitled assets, or incomplete transfers to a trust may require formal proceedings such as a Heggstad petition or trust modification to confirm that assets belong to the trust. These legal title issues often involve third-party institutions, tax considerations, and statutory notice requirements that necessitate thorough legal handling. A judicial determination can provide the certainty needed to transfer property, access retirement plan funds, or resolve conflicts with creditors, and it helps ensure that the settlor’s intended distribution will be honored post-modification.
Pursuing a comprehensive, court-supervised modification provides legal certainty, public record of the change, and enforceable orders that reduce the chance of future disputes. Court approval clarifies trustee powers, beneficiary rights, and the trust’s scope, which can simplify administration and avoid subsequent litigation. For Fresno families, the benefit of a well-documented, judicially recognized modification often includes smoother interactions with financial institutions and clearer guidance for successor trustees who must manage assets after a change is approved.
A thorough approach also allows the court to address related issues such as removal or appointment of trustees, correction of ambiguous language, and resolution of claims about intent or asset ownership. Securing a court order can protect beneficiaries from improper transfers and provide remedies where misconduct or mismanagement is alleged. While a comprehensive petition can require more time and legal resources, the resulting clarity and enforceability often outweigh the initial costs, particularly when valuable assets or complex family dynamics are involved.
A court-sanctioned modification creates a public, enforceable record of the change and reduces ambiguity about the trust’s terms. This legal certainty can ease administration tasks, such as transferring real estate or closing accounts, because third parties are more likely to accept court-ordered modifications than informal arrangements. The court’s involvement also provides a formal remedy if parties fail to comply with the new terms, helping beneficiaries and trustees rely on predictable, enforceable rights and obligations.
Having the court approve a modification can reduce future challenges to trustee actions and beneficiary distributions by establishing clear boundaries and expectations. Trustees acting pursuant to a judicially approved modification are better positioned to defend their decisions, and beneficiaries receive documented assurance that the trust reflects a lawful modification. This protective dimension is especially valuable in families with multiple generations, blended households, or where significant assets or retirement accounts are at stake.
Start by assembling a complete set of trust-related documents, including the original trust, any amendments or restatements, beneficiary designations, account statements, and evidence of attempted transfers. Documentation showing the settlor’s intent, such as contemporaneous letters or communications about planning goals, can be especially helpful when addressing ambiguities or transfer issues. Early and thorough preparation of these materials reduces delays, supports a persuasive petition, and helps ensure proper notice is given to all interested parties in accordance with California procedural requirements.
If all interested parties are willing to reach an agreement, a nonjudicial settlement or formal amendment can achieve the same outcome more quickly and privately. Discussing options with all parties early can reveal opportunities to avoid court by crafting a mutually acceptable document that addresses concerns and clarifies administration. Even when a formal petition becomes necessary later, having attempted cooperative solutions and documented good faith negotiations can present the court with a pragmatic record of efforts to resolve disputes without litigation.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust contains ambiguous language that impedes administration, when a trustee’s authority is disputed, when assets were never properly transferred into the trust, or when family circumstances have changed substantially since the trust was created. Petitioning the court can resolve these matters in a binding way, providing clarity and protecting beneficiary rights. For Fresno residents, court involvement may also be warranted when financial institutions decline to accept informal documentation or when third-party title issues require judicial confirmation to effect transactions.
Other reasons to consider a petition include addressing unanticipated tax consequences, updating trustee compensation or powers in light of new asset types, or creating a record that prevents later disputes among heirs. When the settlor’s wishes are not clearly reflected in existing documents, or when competing interpretations threaten to trigger litigation, the court can evaluate evidence, make determinations about intent, and issue orders that allow trustees to act confidently and beneficiaries to receive distributions according to the resolved terms.
Frequent circumstances prompting petitions include improperly retitled assets, ambiguous clauses about distribution timing, removal or replacement of trustees, changes in family structure such as marriage or divorce, and errors in drafting that misstate beneficiaries or asset descriptions. Events such as a settlor’s incapacity or death can reveal gaps between intended and actual estate planning steps, requiring judicial action to align estate handling with the settlor’s goals. Recognizing these circumstances early helps parties choose the most appropriate legal path.
When assets intended to fund the trust were never properly retitled or transferred, those assets may remain outside the trust and subject to probate. A Heggstad petition or related trust modification action asks the court to recognize that those assets should be treated as trust property because the settlor intended them to be part of the trust. Demonstrating intent often involves account records, transfer attempts, and supporting declarations. Resolving these defects helps ensure the settlor’s plan is carried out and avoids unintended probate administration.
Ambiguous provisions, conflicting clauses, or simple drafting mistakes can disrupt trust administration by creating uncertainty about distribution, trustee powers, or beneficiary rights. When the meaning cannot be resolved by plain reading, a petition to clarify or modify the trust can provide the court’s interpretation or an appropriate correction. Courts consider the trust language in context and may look to evidence of the settlor’s intent. A judicial determination reduces the risk of inconsistent trustee actions and subsequent litigation among beneficiaries.
Disagreements regarding a trustee’s actions, alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, or questions about a trustee’s suitability often lead to petitions that seek removal, surcharge, or clarification of powers. The court will weigh evidence of trustee decisions, beneficiary harm, and the alternatives available before ordering relief. A judicial resolution can appoint a successor trustee, define permissible actions, or establish oversight measures that protect the trust’s assets and ensure distributions align with the trust’s terms and the settlor’s intent.
In Fresno, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists with trust modification petitions, Heggstad petitions, trust corrections, and related probate matters. We aim to provide responsive, clear counsel that explains options, procedural steps, and the likelihood of different outcomes based on local court practice. Our goal is to help clients make informed decisions about whether to pursue a court petition, negotiate a nonjudicial solution, or implement alternative planning steps that address the underlying concerns with minimal disruption to beneficiaries and trustees.
Choosing legal representation that understands both trust law and local probate practice is important when seeking court-ordered modifications. Our firm prioritizes careful preparation of petitions, accurate notice to interested parties, and persuasive presentation of the settlor’s intent and supporting evidence. We aim to reduce procedural pitfalls and to present a clear record to the court so that judges can make informed decisions without unnecessary delay or dispute. This methodical approach helps protect client interests and minimizes surprises during proceedings.
We also focus on communication with beneficiaries and trustees to explore nonjudicial options when appropriate, and to prepare for potential objections when court involvement becomes necessary. Clear documentation, timely filings, and proactive case management are central to our process. For Fresno clients, being prepared for local court calendars and evidentiary expectations makes a meaningful difference in achieving practical, enforceable results that reflect the settlor’s intent while protecting the rights of all parties involved.
If you are considering a trust modification petition, we provide a candid initial assessment of likely pathways and alternatives, discuss evidence that will support the petition, and outline anticipated timelines and required steps. We encourage clients to gather relevant documents and to ask questions early so we can pursue the most appropriate course of action. Contact our office to schedule a consultation and to learn how a carefully prepared petition can resolve ambiguities, correct title issues, or provide needed trustee guidance.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust, related documents, and the facts that give rise to the proposed change. We identify legal grounds for modification, prepare draft petitions and supporting declarations, and ensure proper service on all interested parties. When appropriate we pursue negotiated resolutions, and when litigation is necessary we prepare evidence and filings consistent with Fresno County procedures. Throughout, we maintain regular communication so clients understand deadlines, potential objections, and likely next steps toward achieving a court order when needed.
The first step is a focused assessment of the trust instrument, amendments, and supporting records to determine whether a petition is the proper course. We request account statements, deeds, beneficiary forms, and any communications that reflect the settlor’s intent. This review helps identify title defects, ambiguous clauses, or disputes that require judicial relief. We then advise on likely causes of action, required evidence, and anticipated notice obligations so the client understands what a petition will involve and how best to prepare.
Careful review of trust documents includes identifying inconsistent clauses, missing signatures, or provisions that limit amendment powers. Gathering contemporaneous evidence, such as correspondence about planning goals or records of transfer attempts, strengthens the factual record. This preparatory work allows us to draft a petition that clearly articulates the requested modification and the factual basis for the court to grant relief, reducing the likelihood of procedural deficiencies or discovery disputes that can delay resolution.
Identifying all beneficiaries, potential heirs, and affected parties is critical to fulfilling notice obligations under California law. Proper service preserves the court’s jurisdiction and protects the petitioner from later challenges to the proceeding’s validity. We confirm current addresses, determine the appropriate method of service, and prepare declarations of service to file with the court. Early attention to notice helps avoid delays and ensures that the process moves forward on a solid procedural foundation.
After gathering documents and confirming notice requirements, we draft a petition that frames the requested modification, cites relevant statutes or case law, and attaches supporting declarations and exhibits. The petition sets forth the legal basis for relief and proposes specific changes to the trust instrument or clarifications the court should enter. Once filed, the court issues a hearing date and formal service must be completed. Preparation at this stage focuses on clarity and completeness to withstand potential objections and to present the matter efficiently to the judge.
Supporting declarations provide the facts that justify a modification, such as evidence of intent, mistakes in drafting, or transfer attempts. Exhibits may include the original trust, amendments, account records, deeds, and communications. Presenting an organized factual record helps the court understand why the requested modification reflects the settlor’s intent and how it affects beneficiaries. Well-prepared exhibits reduce the need for supplemental filings and assist the court in reaching a reasoned decision.
After filing the petition, proper service must be completed and declarations confirming service must be filed with the court. Interested parties may file objections or requests for additional information. We prepare responses, consider settlement discussions, and, if necessary, represent clients at hearings. Addressing objections promptly and substantively increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome and demonstrates a commitment to protecting beneficiaries’ rights while adhering to procedural rules in Fresno courts.
The court hearing provides an opportunity to present evidence, respond to objections, and request specific relief. If the judge grants the petition, a formal order will be issued specifying the modified terms and any conditions. After obtaining an order, steps often include recording changes with title companies, notifying financial institutions, and updating trust records. We assist with these post-order actions to ensure the modification is implemented in practice and that trustee actions align with the court’s directives to avoid future disputes.
At the hearing, declarations, exhibits, and witness testimony may be presented to establish the factual basis for the requested change. Clear, focused presentation helps the court evaluate whether the modification is consistent with legal standards and the settlor’s intent. We prepare clients and witnesses for likely questions and provide concise arguments that address the court’s concerns, emphasizing how the proposed modification resolves ambiguity or corrects an error while protecting beneficiary rights and trustee authority.
Once the court issues an order, we assist with implementation steps such as recording amended documents with the county recorder, confirming account retitling with financial institutions, and updating trust inventories. Ensuring third parties accept the court-ordered change can require transmitting certified copies of the order and coordinating with institutions that handle retirement plans, real estate, or investment accounts. Proper follow-up preserves the practical effect of the modification and helps trustees manage assets according to the newly established terms.
A trust modification petition is a formal court request to change or clarify the terms or administration of a trust when informal amendment is not possible or when disputes exist among interested parties. Typical reasons include correcting drafting errors, clarifying ambiguous provisions, addressing improperly transferred assets, or changing trustee authority. The petition sets out the factual and legal basis for the requested modification and asks the court to issue an order that resolves the issue and provides direction for administration. Filing a petition is often necessary when parties cannot reach agreement or when legal defects prevent a simple amendment. The court will consider evidence of the settlor’s intent, statutory provisions that authorize relief, and the interests of beneficiaries. Interested parties receive notice and may object, leading to hearings where the judge evaluates the record and issues binding orders that implement the requested modification or propose alternative relief that better conforms to applicable law and the settlor’s intent.
The timeline for a trust modification petition in Fresno varies based on complexity, notice requirements, and whether objections are filed. Simple matters with agreement among parties can move more quickly, while contested petitions that require hearings and evidentiary submissions may take several months or longer. Local court schedules and required waiting periods for responses to notice can also affect the timeframe, so early preparation and proper service are important to avoid unnecessary delays. If objections arise, the court may set multiple hearings, order additional documentation, or require mediation before a final ruling. Being organized with complete supporting evidence and clear legal arguments helps streamline the process. Our approach focuses on setting realistic expectations based on local practice and proactively addressing common procedural hurdles to move the matter toward a resolution efficiently.
Yes. California rules require notice to interested parties when a petition affecting a trust is filed. Typically, beneficiaries, trustees, and other parties with a legal interest in the trust must receive proper notice so they can object or participate. The method and timing of service are governed by probate rules and failing to provide correct notice can invalidate the proceeding or cause delays, so careful attention to these requirements is essential. Providing notice also allows parties the opportunity to negotiate alternatives that might avoid a contested hearing. If beneficiaries object, the court will consider their arguments and may hold hearings to evaluate evidence. Properly documented service and timely responses increase the chance of a smooth resolution and protect the court’s jurisdiction over the petition.
In some cases a trust can be modified without going to court, such as when the trust document includes a valid amendment provision or when all interested parties agree to a nonjudicial settlement. These options can be faster and more private than filing a petition, but they require clear authority to amend and the consent of all necessary parties. A properly executed amendment or nonjudicial agreement must still comply with the trust’s terms and applicable law to be effective. When parties cannot agree, when title issues exist, or when statutory authority for modification is uncertain, court involvement becomes necessary to obtain a binding resolution. Evaluating whether a nonjudicial approach is feasible requires review of the trust document, the parties involved, and the nature of the desired change. We help clients assess whether a nonjudicial solution is realistic and prepare documentation when it is possible.
A Heggstad petition requires evidence that the settlor intended certain assets to be part of the trust despite imperfect transfer formalities. Relevant evidence includes account statements, transfer attempts, correspondence, deed records, and witness declarations confirming the settlor’s intent. The goal is to demonstrate a sufficient connection between the asset and the trust so the court can treat the asset as trust property and avoid probate administration for those assets. Because Heggstad petitions involve factual inquiries about intent and transfer efforts, organized documentation and credible declarations are important. The court will evaluate the totality of the evidence to determine whether the asset should be treated as belonging to the trust. Preparing a thorough factual record increases the likelihood the court will grant the requested relief and will help with third-party acceptance of the court’s determination.
Yes, a petition may include requests related to trustee removal, replacement, or clarification of trustee powers when a trustee’s conduct or incapacity raises concern. The court evaluates allegations such as breaches of fiduciary duty, mismanagement, inability to serve, or conflicts of interest. If removal is appropriate, the court can appoint a successor trustee and establish terms for transition and asset handover to protect beneficiaries’ interests. Allegations against a trustee should be supported with factual evidence and documentation. Filing such a petition can involve contested hearings, which require careful preparation and presentation of evidence. Courts prioritize the trust’s purposes and beneficiary protections when considering trustee-related relief, and any action taken aims to maintain continuity of administration and minimize disruption to beneficiaries.
When beneficiaries dispute a proposed modification, the court provides a forum for airing evidence, evaluating competing interpretations of the trust, and resolving conflicts in a legally binding way. The judge considers the trust language, evidence of the settlor’s intentions, and the legal grounds for modification. Parties may present declarations, documents, and testimony supporting their positions, and the court may encourage mediation or settlement discussions to resolve issues without a prolonged trial. If mediation is unsuccessful, the court will determine whether the requested relief is justified based on the evidence and applicable law. The decision will balance fairness to beneficiaries with fidelity to the settlor’s probable intent. A judicial resolution creates clarity for trustees and beneficiaries and helps prevent recurring disputes over the same issues.
A court-ordered modification can have tax implications depending on the nature of the changes, the types of assets involved, and how distributions are restructured. For example, changes affecting ownership of appreciated property or retirement accounts may trigger different tax reporting considerations. It is important to consult tax advisors in conjunction with legal counsel to evaluate any tax consequences before finalizing major modifications. When preparing a petition, we consider potential tax effects and may coordinate with financial or tax professionals to structure relief in a way that minimizes adverse consequences. Clear documentation and careful planning help manage tax exposure and support implementation steps required after the court issues its order, such as retitling assets in a tax-aware manner.
Costs associated with filing a petition include court filing fees, service fees, and legal fees for preparing and prosecuting the matter. Fees vary based on complexity, whether the matter is contested, and the amount of evidence or hearings required. Contested proceedings with multiple hearings and substantial discovery will typically incur higher costs than agreed or uncontested petitions. It is helpful to get an initial estimate of likely fees and to discuss scope, milestones, and possible alternatives that could reduce expense. We provide transparent fee discussions during initial consultations and can often propose phased approaches that prioritize the most important tasks first. Exploring nonjudicial solutions when feasible can also lower overall costs. When litigation cannot be avoided, careful case management and focused preparation can help control fees while pursuing the necessary relief.
To start the process, collect the trust document, any amendments, related deeds or account statements, and any correspondence showing the settlor’s intent. Contact our office to schedule a consultation where we will review these materials, discuss the facts, and recommend whether a petition is appropriate. Early document collection and a clear summary of the issues will help us provide an actionable plan and initial cost estimate. During the initial meeting we explain the likely pathways, notice requirements, and evidence that will support a petition. If you choose to proceed, we will prepare the necessary filings, handle service and procedural steps, and represent your interests at hearings. Starting early ensures deadlines are met and interested parties are properly identified and notified.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas