If you are considering changing a trust in Parlier, a trust modification petition can help you adjust the terms to reflect new circumstances. This service is provided by the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman and focuses on preparing and filing the appropriate petition with the court, explaining the legal grounds for modification, and representing your interests through necessary hearings or negotiations. We assist clients with various issues such as changes in family relationships, tax or asset concerns, relocation, and errors or ambiguities in trust language, always aiming for solutions that protect your long-term goals and preserve the trust intent.
A trust modification petition may be appropriate when circumstances have changed since a trust was created and the original terms no longer meet the grantor’s or beneficiaries’ needs. Our approach begins with a careful review of the trust documents and the facts giving rise to the requested change. We guide clients through required notices, gather supporting evidence, and outline likely outcomes so that you can make informed decisions. Whether the modification involves distribution changes, trustee powers, or tax planning provisions, we work to achieve a clear, legally sound order that reflects the parties’ intentions in compliance with California rules.
A properly handled trust modification petition can preserve the original intent of the trust while adapting to new realities, such as changes in family composition, financial circumstances, or state law. Filing a petition avoids future disputes by obtaining a court-ordered clarification or amendment, which provides formal authority for acting under the revised terms. This process can prevent unintended consequences, reduce the potential for litigation among beneficiaries, and ensure that trustees have the documented power to carry out any new directions. It also helps protect assets by aligning the trust with current tax considerations and personal goals.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Parlier and throughout Fresno County, providing practical guidance on trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. Our team focuses on clear communication, thorough document review, and careful procedural preparation. We work closely with clients to collect necessary records, draft petitions, and shepherd matters through the court process. Clients value our local knowledge of California trust law and our ability to explain complex issues in straightforward terms while pursuing outcomes that protect family relationships and financial interests.
A trust modification petition asks a court to change a trust’s provisions or to resolve ambiguity in the document when parties cannot or should not rely on informal methods alone. Grounds for modification include consent of all interested parties, changed circumstances that frustrate original purposes, mistakes in drafting, or the need to conform the trust to current law. The petition process requires adherence to statutory notice rules, clear factual support for the requested change, and an explanation of how the modification will affect beneficiaries. Courts evaluate whether the proposed amendment aligns with the trust’s intent and California statutory standards.
Before filing a petition, it is important to exhaust less formal options when appropriate, such as agreement among beneficiaries or trustee action when authorized by the trust document. When agreement is not possible, or when legal clarity is needed, a petition provides a binding resolution. The court will consider the interests of all parties, including minor or incapacitated beneficiaries and any creditors whose rights may be affected. Preparing a persuasive petition typically involves a careful factual record, affidavits, and legal citations to show why the requested modification is consistent with the trust’s purposes and California law.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to amend, reform, or construe the terms of an existing trust. It applies in situations where the trust cannot be changed informally, where parties dispute the proper reading of provisions, or where circumstances have rendered the trust impracticable or inconsistent with the grantor’s objectives. The petition will outline the relief sought, the factual basis for the request, and the identities of interested parties. The court evaluates whether the modification preserves the original purpose and whether statutory or equitable grounds justify the change.
Preparing a trust modification petition requires assembling the trust document, beneficiary lists, supporting declarations, and evidence of changed circumstances or drafting errors. The petition must be properly served on all interested parties and comply with California Probate Code provisions governing trust proceedings. Practically, the process includes initial consultation, document review, drafting the petition and declarations, filing with the court, serving notices, and participating in hearings or mediation if objections arise. The timeline varies based on complexity, the number of parties, and whether disputes are contested or resolved by stipulation.
Understanding common terms helps clients navigate the petition process. Definitions clarify the roles of grantors, trustees, beneficiaries, and the court; explain legal concepts such as reformation, construction, and decanting; and identify statutes that govern trust modifications in California. Familiarity with these terms makes it easier to follow the process, recognize potential issues, and participate meaningfully in decision-making. Below are practical definitions to frame the discussion and provide context for how a petition operates in practice and how court orders affect trust administration.
The grantor or settlor is the person who created the trust and set its initial terms, including the distribution plan, trustee powers, and intended beneficiaries. When a petition seeks modification, understanding the grantor’s original intent is central to the court’s review because modifications should honor that intent whenever possible. The grantor may be living or deceased; when alive, the grantor’s subsequent actions or agreements may affect whether petition-based modifications are necessary. Evidence about the grantor’s intent, such as draft documents or contemporaneous statements, can be important to justify changes or corrections to trust language.
Reformation is a legal remedy that allows the court to modify the trust document to reflect the true intention of the grantor when a mistake in drafting led to an outcome the grantor did not intend. Reformation typically requires clear and convincing evidence that a drafting error occurred and that the proposed change aligns with the grantor’s actual intent. This process can correct ambiguous or erroneous provisions and prevent results that would defeat the trust’s purposes. Reformation is often used when the language of the trust fails to capture the grantor’s plan due to clerical errors or miscommunication with the drafter.
A beneficiary is any person or entity entitled to receive benefits from the trust under its terms, including income, principal, or specific distributions. Beneficiaries have legal interests that must be considered in any petition to modify a trust. The court requires notice to beneficiaries and will evaluate whether a proposed modification materially affects their rights. Beneficiaries may include family members, charities, or institutions, and their positions on a proposed change can influence whether the petition is contested and how the court resolves competing interests while ensuring fairness and compliance with the trust’s purpose.
The trustee is the person or institution charged with managing the trust assets and carrying out the terms established by the grantor. Trustees have fiduciary duties to administer the trust prudently and in the beneficiaries’ best interests, and those duties continue even during proceedings to modify the trust. When a petition is filed, trustees may need to provide records, accountings, or declarations about administration decisions. The court may also adjust trustee powers or remove and replace a trustee if the circumstances justify such action and it serves the trust’s purposes.
When considering changes to a trust, parties can sometimes rely on informal approaches such as beneficiary agreements, trustee actions authorized by the trust, or nonjudicial settlement agreements permitted under California law. These options can be faster and less adversarial but require clear consent and careful documentation to avoid future disputes. A trust modification petition is the formal alternative when informal methods are unavailable, when consent is incomplete, or when court authority is needed to resolve ambiguities. Choosing the right path depends on the complexity of the change, the relationship among parties, and the need for enforceable court approval.
A limited approach may be appropriate when all beneficiaries and the trustee agree to a specific change and the trust document permits the trustee to act or parties to enter into a settlement. When consensus is complete, parties can avoid the cost and delay of court proceedings by documenting their agreement in writing and updating administrative records. It is important to ensure that any nonjudicial resolution complies with California statutes and that the change does not prejudice absent or protected beneficiaries. Properly drafted agreements reduce the risk of later challenges and provide a clear paper trail for trustees and successor fiduciaries.
For clerical or administrative corrections that do not alter beneficiaries’ substantive rights, the trustee may be able to make changes without court approval, subject to careful documentation and, in some cases, consent. Examples include correcting typographical errors, updating contact information, or clarifying procedural details that do not change distribution outcomes. Even for minor corrections, transparent recordkeeping and communication with beneficiaries can prevent disputes and provide a defensible administrative trail. When uncertainty exists about the effect of a correction, seeking court guidance protects trustees from later challenges.
Comprehensive legal assistance is advisable when beneficiaries disagree about proposed changes or when a trustee’s authority is contested, because these conflicts often require formal evidence, legal argument, and court rulings. A petition provides a structured forum to resolve disputes, ensure proper notice, and secure an enforceable order that clarifies rights and duties. Counsel helps gather affidavits, financial records, and legal authorities to present a persuasive case to the judge. This process reduces uncertainty and judicially resolves conflicting claims about administration, distributions, or trustee conduct.
When the requested modification could materially affect tax consequences, creditor rights, or major asset distributions, a carefully prepared petition is important to ensure that the court considers these impacts and issues a valid order. Complex financial structures, retirement accounts, or life insurance arrangements often require specialized legal analysis to avoid unintended tax liabilities or creditor exposure. Legal guidance helps frame proposed changes in ways that preserve asset protection goals and minimize adverse tax results while complying with California trust and probate law.
A comprehensive approach delivers a formal court order that removes ambiguity and provides clear authority for trustees to act under revised trust terms, reducing the risk of later disputes. Court approval also creates a public record that may facilitate administration across financial institutions and third parties who require documented authority. By addressing potential conflicts, tax considerations, and notice requirements up front, the process aims to minimize future litigation and provide beneficiaries with certainty about their rights. This overall clarity helps trustees administer the trust with confidence and beneficiaries to understand their expectations.
Comprehensive representation during a petition also ensures that all procedural prerequisites are met and that appropriate evidence is presented to support the modification. This includes preparing declarations, collecting financial records, and explaining how the amendment aligns with the trust’s purpose. The result is a durable resolution that respects the grantor’s intent and protects beneficiaries’ interests. A court-backed modification can also facilitate transfers, account changes, and third-party recognition of the new terms, which streamlines administration and helps preserve family harmony where possible.
Obtaining a court order through a trust modification petition provides legal certainty because it establishes the revised terms as enforceable against all interested parties once the court rules. This prevents later disputes over whether an informal agreement was valid or whether a trustee had authority to act. Legal certainty reduces delays in distributing assets and reassures financial institutions, beneficiaries, and fiduciaries that the trust will be administered according to the corrected, court-approved terms. That certainty is especially valuable when third parties require judicial documentation to release funds or transfer titles.
A formal petition process ensures that all beneficiaries receive proper notice and have an opportunity to be heard, which protects their legal rights and reduces the risk of hidden claims later. Properly handled petitions include evaluations of how changes affect present and contingent beneficiaries, minors, or protected parties, and they may incorporate provisions that safeguard vulnerable individuals. By resolving disputes in court rather than by informal agreement alone, the process fosters equitable outcomes and creates an enforceable record that respects beneficiaries’ interests and the grantor’s underlying intentions.
Before pursuing a petition, collect all relevant trust documents, amendments, account statements, and correspondence that reflect the grantor’s intent and administration history. Having a complete, organized file streamlines the drafting of declarations and helps the court see the full context for the requested change. Evidence such as prior drafts, emails discussing intent, and historical distributions can be helpful when explaining why a modification is needed. Documenting the facts early also reduces the risk of surprise objections and supports a smoother case timeline through the court process.
Expect that proposed changes may prompt questions or objections from beneficiaries, creditors, or trustees, and prepare evidence and legal arguments addressing likely concerns. That includes demonstrating how the modification aligns with the trust’s purpose, providing financial records showing the absence of prejudice, and submitting declarations from relevant witnesses. Addressing potential challenges proactively can lead to quicker resolutions and opportunities for settlement before contested hearings. Thoughtful preparation enhances the likelihood of a favorable court ruling and reduces the costs associated with protracted disputes.
Consider a petition when the trust’s terms no longer reflect the grantor’s intent, when ambiguities create administration problems, or when changes in family, financial, or legal circumstances make the original provisions impractical. A petition is also appropriate when one or more interested parties cannot agree to an informal amendment, when trustee powers must be clarified, or when a correction is needed to address drafting errors. Bringing the matter before the court provides a binding resolution and protects trustees and beneficiaries by documenting the change in an enforceable order.
Other reasons to seek judicial modification include resolving disputes over whether a particular distribution was intended, addressing the needs of minor or incapacitated beneficiaries, and handling complex assets that require formal authority to transfer. A petition can also be used to adapt a trust to new tax law developments or to create administrative simplifications that improve long-term management. When the desired change affects multiple parties or has broad financial implications, the court’s involvement ensures that the modification is effective and appropriately balanced among competing interests.
Typical circumstances include drafting errors discovered after funding, beneficiaries who predecease or become incapacitated, relocation that affects administration, changed tax law, or family events such as divorce that make original distributions undesirable. Trustees sometimes lack necessary authority under the trust document or beneficiaries disagree about interpretation. These situations often require a formal court order to clarify intent, correct mistakes, or adapt the trust to current conditions. Addressing these issues through a petition helps prevent future disputes and ensures administration aligns with updated goals and obligations.
When language in the trust fails to reflect the grantor’s instructions due to drafting errors or ambiguities, the resulting uncertainty can impede administration and create disputes. A petition to reform or construe the trust can correct those errors and align the document with the grantor’s true intent, provided the court receives adequate evidence. This remedy is important when informal correction is impossible or when beneficiaries disagree about the correct interpretation. Clear documentation and a careful presentation of the facts increase the likelihood that the court will accept the proposed reformation.
Life events such as births, deaths, divorces, or changes in beneficiaries’ needs may render original trust provisions inappropriate or unfair. When beneficiaries’ circumstances have changed substantially, a petition can realign distributions or trustee directives to reflect the updated family dynamics while preserving the grantor’s overall plan. The court evaluates whether the modification maintains the trust’s purpose and considers the effects on all interested parties. In many cases, a judicial order prevents future conflicts by making the revised plan clear and enforceable.
Trustees may encounter obstacles in administering a trust when the document’s language is vague, when powers are limited, or when institutions demand clear court authorization to act. A petition can expand or clarify trustee powers, permit specific transactions, or resolve disputes about fiduciary conduct. Courts review whether proposed changes are consistent with the trust’s purpose and the beneficiaries’ interests. Seeking judicial guidance helps trustees perform their duties confidently and can protect them from later liability for actions taken under an ambiguous or outdated trust document.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides local representation for trust modification petitions in Parlier and nearby Fresno County communities, assisting with court filings, notices, and hearings when necessary. We help clients evaluate informal options, prepare the petition and supporting declarations, and communicate with beneficiaries and trustees to seek constructive resolutions. Our aim is to help you obtain a clear, enforceable order that reflects the grantor’s intent and practical needs. We also coordinate with financial institutions and other third parties to implement the court’s directives efficiently.
Clients choose our firm for practical, responsive guidance on trust matters, including modification petitions, trust construction, and related probate proceedings. We prioritize clear communication, thorough document review, and careful procedural preparation to minimize delays and reduce the risk of contested hearings. From the initial case evaluation through final court orders, we work to protect clients’ interests and preserve family relationships whenever possible. Our goal is to help you arrive at a durable resolution that aligns with the trust’s purpose and provides certainty for trustees and beneficiaries.
We focus on developing legal strategies tailored to each client’s situation, considering the facts, the trust terms, and the likely positions of interested parties. That includes advising on notice requirements, identifying potential objections, and preparing supporting affidavits and exhibits to make a persuasive case to the court. We strive to resolve matters efficiently through negotiation or settlement where appropriate, while remaining prepared to litigate when necessary to protect a client’s rights and ensure proper administration under the revised trust terms.
In addition to litigation readiness, we assist with post-order implementation tasks, such as coordinating transfers, updating account registration, and preparing documentation for banks and title companies to recognize the amended trust. This comprehensive service reduces administrative friction and helps trustees carry out the court-ordered changes with confidence. We also remain available for follow-up matters, including related estate planning updates, successor trustee transitions, and occasional trust administration questions that arise after a modification has been approved.
Our process begins with an intake meeting to review the trust documents, identify interested parties, and evaluate whether a petition is needed or an informal path is available. We then prepare a strategy, draft the petition and supporting declarations, and advise on required notices. After filing, we monitor service, respond to objections, and represent clients at hearings or mediations. Throughout, we strive to keep clients informed of progress and options, working toward a court resolution that provides clarity and enforceability for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
The initial step focuses on collecting pertinent documents, including the trust, amendments, account records, and any communications evidencing the grantor’s intent. We identify all interested parties and assess whether informal resolution is feasible. Gathering declarations and corroborating documents early strengthens the petition and reduces surprises during proceedings. This phase also includes advising the client on potential impacts, required notices, and timing considerations so that the petition is prepared with a clear evidentiary foundation and procedural plan for submission to the court.
We conduct a detailed review of the trust and related records to determine the nature of the requested change, the possible legal bases for modification, and which parties must be notified. This analysis identifies any drafting errors, ambiguous provisions, and historical actions that bear on the petition. By assessing the strengths and vulnerabilities of the case, we can recommend whether to pursue a petition, attempt a negotiated solution, or explore alternative remedies, while laying out the evidence needed to support the requested relief in court.
Supporting declarations are central to establishing the factual basis for a petition, and we assist clients and witnesses in preparing clear, persuasive statements that explain relevant events, communications, and intentions. This includes drafting affidavits from trustees, beneficiaries, or professionals who can corroborate the grantor’s intent or describe changed circumstances. Properly organized evidence and well-crafted declarations help the court understand why the modification is justified and reduce opportunities for successful challenges by opposing parties.
Once the petition and supporting documents are prepared, we file them with the appropriate probate court and arrange service on all required interested parties. The court sets timelines for responses and may schedule a hearing or require additional documentation. We handle procedural requirements such as proof of service and compliance with statutory notice provisions. Early case management often identifies opportunities for settlement or alternative dispute resolution, but we remain prepared to respond to any formal objections that may arise during this stage.
Proper service and strict adherence to court deadlines are essential to avoid delays or procedural defects. We verify addresses, arrange personal or substituted service when necessary, and file proof of service to establish the court’s jurisdiction over interested parties. Managing calendar deadlines for responses and hearings ensures that the matter progresses efficiently and that objections are addressed in a timely fashion. Attention to these details reduces the risk of the petition being contested on technical grounds and supports a smoother path to resolution.
If objections are filed, we evaluate their merits and seek resolution through negotiation or mediation when appropriate, presenting settlement options that protect client interests while avoiding protracted litigation. When agreement cannot be reached, we prepare formal responses and evidentiary support for contested hearings. Often, collaborative discussions lead to stipulated modifications that the court can approve, saving time and expense. When disputes proceed to court, our preparation ensures that the judge has a clear presentation of the facts and legal rationale supporting the requested change.
The final phase includes attending hearings, presenting evidence, and requesting an order that amends or construes the trust as appropriate. If the court approves the petition, we assist with drafting the order, obtaining its entry, and circulating certified copies to trustees, financial institutions, and other parties who require proof of the change. Post-order implementation may involve updating account registrations, transferring assets, and documenting revised administrative procedures, ensuring that the court’s directives are implemented smoothly and the trust is administered under its new terms.
At the hearing, we present the factual narrative and legal grounds supporting the petition, using declarations, documentary evidence, and legal argument to demonstrate that the requested modification aligns with the grantor’s intent and statutory standards. We also address objections and respond to the court’s questions about potential impacts on beneficiaries and administration. Clear, well-organized presentation at the hearing improves the likelihood of a favorable ruling and produces an enforceable order that resolves outstanding issues and guides future trust administration.
Once the court issues an order, we assist clients with obtaining certified copies, notifying institutions, and carrying out administrative tasks required to effectuate the change. This may include updating account titles, executing transfers to new beneficiaries, or revising trustee authorities. We provide a checklist and follow-up support to ensure that financial institutions, title companies, and other third parties recognize the amended trust. Timely implementation reduces the risk of misdirected distributions and helps the trustee manage assets under the newly sanctioned terms.
A trust modification petition is a court filing asking the probate court to amend, reform, or construe a trust when informal changes are inappropriate or unavailable. It is necessary when beneficiaries do not all agree, when the trust contains drafting errors or ambiguities, or when changed circumstances make the original terms impractical. The petition explains the relief sought, presents supporting evidence, and requests a judicial order to clarify or change the trust’s provisions. The court evaluates the petition against California statutes and the trust’s purpose, considering notice to interested parties and potential impacts on beneficiaries. If the petition is granted, the resulting order provides clear direction for trustees and third parties, reducing the risk of later disputes and enabling orderly administration under the revised terms.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies based on complexity, number of parties, and whether objections arise. An uncontested petition with full consent and complete documentation can move relatively quickly, often within a few months, while contested matters may take longer due to briefing, discovery, and hearing schedules. Procedural requirements such as service, response periods, and court calendars play a significant role in timing. Preparing a thorough petition and maintaining open communication among parties can shorten the process, and exploring settlement or mediation early can avoid extended litigation. We provide realistic timeline estimates after reviewing the specific facts and will advise on steps to keep the matter moving efficiently while protecting client interests.
Not all beneficiaries must always agree to a modification, but consent can simplify the process and avoid contested proceedings. When all interested parties consent and the change does not prejudice any protected beneficiary, an informal agreement or stipulated order may be possible. When unanimous consent is not obtainable or when the modification affects rights that require court approval, a petition becomes the appropriate pathway to obtain a binding court order. The court requires notice to all interested parties and will consider objections from beneficiaries. In contested cases, the court weighs evidence and statutory standards to decide whether the proposed change preserves the trust’s intent and is fair to affected beneficiaries, issuing an enforceable order when appropriate.
Yes, a petition can request removal or replacement of a trustee if circumstances justify that relief, such as breach of fiduciary duty, incapacity, or inability to administer the trust effectively. The petition must present facts and evidence supporting the requested change and propose an appropriate successor trustee, demonstrating why the change serves the trust’s purpose and beneficiaries’ interests. The court considers the trustee’s conduct, the availability of suitable alternatives, and the potential impacts on administration. If removal is ordered, the court will usually issue instructions for transfer of assets and duties to the successor to ensure continuity and minimize disruption for beneficiaries and third parties.
Evidence to reform a trust for drafting errors typically includes contemporaneous documents, drafts, correspondence, or witness declarations showing the grantor’s true intent and how the written language failed to reflect that intent. Affidavits from individuals familiar with the grantor’s intentions, communications with the drafter, or prior versions of the document can be persuasive. The court looks for clear proof that the discrepancy resulted from a mistake and that the proposed reformation corrects that mistake to reflect the grantor’s actual plan. Accurate, organized documentation prepared early in the process strengthens a petition and reduces the likelihood of successful objections. We help clients locate, authenticate, and present relevant evidence to support a reformation claim and to demonstrate that the requested change aligns with the trust’s overarching purpose.
California law requires proper notice to all interested parties, including beneficiaries, trustees, and other persons with a legal interest in the trust. Notice is typically accomplished by personal service or mail in accordance with probate rules, and the petitioner must file proof of service with the court. When parties cannot be located, the statute provides alternative methods of service, such as publication, under certain conditions to ensure the court’s jurisdictional requirements are met. Keeping an accurate list of addresses and identifying all potential interested parties early reduces the risk of defective service. We assist clients in preparing and executing service documents and in filing the necessary proof of service to demonstrate to the court that notice obligations have been satisfied.
Costs for filing a trust modification petition typically include court filing fees, costs of service, and attorney fees associated with preparing the petition, declarations, and supporting exhibits. If the matter is uncontested and straightforward, costs may be modest, but contested matters requiring discovery, hearings, or expert input can increase expenses. Other costs may include title work, record retrieval, and fees for certified copies of court orders necessary for third-party implementation. We provide a clear estimate of likely costs after an initial review and discuss cost-saving options such as pursuing settlement or narrowing issues. Transparent communication about fees and budgeting helps clients make informed decisions about how to proceed while seeking the most efficient resolution.
Yes, a trust can sometimes be modified through a petition to address tax or creditor concerns, but such changes require careful legal analysis to avoid unintended consequences. Modifications that affect tax treatment, creditor rights, or eligibility for public benefits must be designed to comply with tax law and relevant statutes. The court will consider how the proposed change affects these areas and whether it aligns with the trust’s purpose and the grantor’s intent. Coordination with tax counsel and careful factual presentation are often necessary when tax or creditor implications are at issue. We evaluate potential effects and draft petitions that seek to minimize adverse results while providing the court with the information needed to approve appropriate changes.
If a beneficiary objects to the proposed modification, the court will consider the objection as part of the proceedings and may schedule a hearing to resolve disputed issues. Objections often focus on alleged prejudice, lack of proper notice, or disagreement about the grantor’s intent. The court assesses the evidence from both sides and determines whether the proposed change meets statutory and equitable standards for modification, reformation, or construction. Many objections can be resolved through negotiation, mediation, or clarified evidence, which can lead to stipulated orders that the court will approve. When litigation proceeds, thorough preparation and presentation of documentary and testimonial evidence increase the chances of achieving a fair judicial resolution.
To start the process in Parlier, gather your trust documents, any amendments or related records, and contact our office for an initial consultation to review the facts and objectives. We will identify interested parties, evaluate whether informal resolution is possible, and recommend the appropriate course of action. If a petition is necessary, we explain the required documentation, notice procedures, and likely timeline so you understand each step. Early organization of documents and identification of beneficiaries reduces delays and supports a prepared petition. We will guide you through evidence gathering, petition drafting, and court procedures to pursue a clear and enforceable modification tailored to your circumstances.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas