A Heggstad petition is a legal request used to transfer property into a trust when assets were intended to be held by the trust but were not properly titled before a person’s passing. In Reedley and across Fresno County, this remedy can help beneficiaries and trustees avoid full probate administration when a decedent clearly intended trust ownership. The petition asks the court to recognize that the decedent held legal title in trust and orders the property moved to the trust’s ownership. Because timing and documentation matter, many people seek guidance to determine whether a Heggstad petition is the right path to complete trust funding and preserve estate planning goals.
When a Heggstad petition is successful, assets that were meant to be in a trust are confirmed as trust property, which can simplify administration and reduce delays. The petition process typically involves gathering evidence of the decedent’s intent, such as trust documents, deeds, beneficiary designations, and communications that show ownership was meant for the trust. In Reedley, families often use this process to address real property, bank accounts, or retirement assets that were not retitled. Understanding the steps, timelines, and potential outcomes helps family members make informed decisions about preserving trust benefits and minimizing probate exposure.
Filing a Heggstad petition can restore the intended operation of a trust by formally recognizing assets that should have been owned by the trust. The primary benefits include potentially avoiding probate, clarifying title issues, and ensuring that the decedent’s distribution plans are carried out as intended. For trustees and beneficiaries in Reedley, this process can reduce administrative burdens and legal uncertainty, allowing assets to be transferred to rightful beneficiaries under trust terms. Additionally, resolving funding gaps early can prevent disputes among heirs and enable smoother trust administration moving forward, which often preserves time and resources for the estate.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves California clients with practical estate planning and trust administration services, including assistance with Heggstad petitions when trust funding issues arise. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, careful documentation review, and strategic preparation of court filings that explain the decedent’s intent and support a transfer to the trust. We work with trustees and family members to collect deeds, title documents, beneficiary forms, and correspondence that demonstrate the trust relationship. Our goal is to resolve funding gaps efficiently while protecting the interests of beneficiaries and minimizing delays to distribution.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to declare that certain property belonged to a decedent’s trust despite not being formally retitled before death. The petition must show convincing evidence that the decedent intended the trust to own the asset, such as a trust instrument naming the asset or contemporaneous documents and actions consistent with trust ownership. Courts look at the totality of evidence, including drafts, beneficiary designations, deeds, and communications. This process is specific to California procedures and provides a targeted remedy when title issues would otherwise force assets into probate administration.
The petition typically includes a factual declaration, relevant documentary evidence, and legal argument demonstrating the trust relationship. Interested parties, including heirs and creditors, are notified and may respond, which makes careful case preparation essential. The court evaluates whether equity supports recognizing the trust’s ownership and may order title changes or recognition of trust rights. While not every untitled asset can be resolved through a Heggstad petition, successful petitions can save time, reduce court involvement, and honor the decedent’s estate plan by keeping trust assets outside the formal probate estate.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that property intended to be held in a trust should be treated as trust property despite improper titling. It is commonly used when a decedent executed a trust but failed to retitle assets, leaving important property in the decedent’s name. The petition frames the legal and factual history so the court can make a binding determination. Evidence commonly includes the trust document, deeds, transfer records, and communications showing intent. The remedy promotes the decedent’s planned distribution and can prevent unnecessary probate court involvement for assets that truly belong to the trust.
Successful petitions require clear documentation and careful legal presentation. Key elements include establishing the existence of a valid trust, demonstrating intent that the asset be included in the trust, and supplying supporting records such as deeds, assignment forms, or correspondence. The process often begins with an asset audit to identify property not properly retitled, followed by collection of supporting documents and drafting of the petition. Notification requirements mean that interested parties receive notice and may respond. The court considers the evidence and may issue an order recognizing trust ownership, enabling title correction and trust administration to proceed.
Understanding terminology helps people follow the Heggstad petition process and recognize the documentation courts find persuasive. Common terms include trust funding, deed reformation, probate avoidance, and trustee powers. Knowing what these phrases mean clarifies why certain records matter and how a petition aims to align legal title with the decedent’s documented intent. When preparing a petition, it is helpful to assemble the trust declaration, property deeds, beneficiary designations, and any written proof of instructions that link assets to the trust. Clear labels and consistent records support a persuasive filing.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing requesting that a court recognize property as belonging to a trust despite a lack of formal retitling before the owner’s death. It is named after a case addressing this remedy and is used to clarify title issues that would otherwise result in probate administration. The petition presents evidence of the decedent’s intent and asks the court to order transfer or recognition of ownership in the trust. Items commonly addressed include real property, bank accounts, and assets mistakenly left in the decedent’s name.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring assets into a trust so the trust can manage and distribute them according to its terms. Funding may require deeds, assignment forms, beneficiary designation changes, or account retitling. When assets remain outside the trust, tools like a Heggstad petition can be used to remedy the oversight after death. Proper funding ensures the trust operates as intended and can avoid court-managed probate for funded assets.
Probate avoidance describes strategies and legal remedies intended to keep assets out of the probate process so they pass directly under trust terms or beneficiary designations. A Heggstad petition is one remedy that can prevent probate for assets meant to be held by a trust but not retitled. Avoiding probate can save time, maintain privacy, and reduce procedural steps needed to distribute assets to beneficiaries according to the decedent’s estate plan.
Title reformation involves correcting how a property title is recorded to reflect the actual intent of the parties, which may include recognizing trust ownership when a deed or account title does not match the trust instrument. A Heggstad petition can prompt a court to order title changes or declarations that align with the decedent’s intent, enabling successors to transfer property into the trust and continue administration according to trust terms.
A Heggstad petition offers a targeted court remedy for correcting trust funding errors, while other options include full probate, informal proceedings, or negotiated transfers among heirs. Probate can be broader and more time-consuming, involving appointment of a personal representative and court-supervised distribution. A petition aims to limit court involvement by showing the asset belonged to the trust, which can be faster and less intrusive when evidence supports the claim. Choosing the right route depends on the asset type, available documentation, and whether interested parties dispute ownership.
A Heggstad petition is often appropriate when the decedent left strong documentary evidence of intent to include assets in a trust, such as a trust instrument naming the asset, a deed with language pointing to trust ownership, or correspondence indicating the decedent’s plan. When such records are available, the petition can efficiently present a narrow legal claim that aligns title with intent. This targeted approach can prevent the need for broader probate steps, reduce delays in transferring property to trust beneficiaries, and preserve the decedent’s estate planning goals while minimizing time in court.
When only one or a few assets are mis-titled and ownership history is straightforward, a Heggstad petition typically provides a practical solution. The petition concentrates on those specific assets and the factual record showing the decedent’s intended trust ownership. Because the remedy focuses on discrete items, it can be less costly and faster than opening full probate. This route works best when heirs are in agreement or when documentary evidence is strong enough to support the court’s recognition of trust ownership without prolonged dispute.
A comprehensive approach is often advisable when the estate includes multiple assets with complex ownership records or when heirs raise competing claims. In such situations, courts may require broader fact-finding and procedural steps, which can involve multiple filings and detailed discovery. A fuller legal strategy helps coordinate title corrections, resolve disputes, and ensure that all assets are properly identified and transferred. Comprehensive representation assists families in navigating competing interests and in assembling evidence for complex holdings to achieve a fair and legally sound resolution.
When there is a substantial likelihood of litigation, contested beneficiary claims, or creditor issues, a more robust legal approach is prudent. Comprehensive representation includes preemptive investigation, creditor notifications, and coordination of multiple filings to protect estate assets and the trust’s integrity. This approach reduces the chance of surprises during administration, helps verify creditor claims, and manages potential settlement or litigation strategies. Taking a broader view prevents procedural errors and better positions trustees and beneficiaries to achieve outcomes aligned with the decedent’s wishes.
A comprehensive approach to resolving funding gaps and title issues ensures that all affected assets are identified and that legal remedies are applied consistently. By conducting a thorough review of estate documents, deeds, beneficiary forms, and financial accounts, families can prevent overlooked items from triggering future disputes. Comprehensive handling also clarifies responsibilities for trustees and beneficiaries, reduces the risk of later litigation, and helps align the administration with the decedent’s overall estate plan. The result is more predictable outcomes and smoother transitions of asset ownership.
Taking a full-scope approach can also create efficiencies by consolidating filings and communications, addressing creditor notifications, and resolving any conflicting records in one coordinated process. This reduces the administrative burden on family members and shortens the timeline to distribution when compared with piecemeal solutions. A careful, documented plan supports the legal arguments needed for title recognition and improves the odds of a timely court order acknowledging trust ownership, which can ultimately preserve more estate value for beneficiaries.
By addressing all potential funding gaps and conflicting records at once, a comprehensive approach reduces the likelihood that missing assets or ambiguities will spark disputes later on. When the court formally recognizes trust ownership through proper petitions and filings, successors have a clearer legal foundation for distribution. Thorough records and consistent filings limit opportunities for misunderstandings and competing claims, preserving family relationships and reducing the chance of costly, prolonged litigation. This protective value is often as important as the immediate administrative efficiencies.
Comprehensive planning and remedying of title defects enable trustees to proceed with administration and distribution with fewer interruptions. When courts accept orderly petitions and documentation, assets flow into the trust or are recognized as trust property more quickly, allowing beneficiaries to receive their distributions without unnecessary delay. The streamlined process saves time for family members and reduces the administrative workload for trustees, which can lead to better stewardship of assets and a more respectful handling of the decedent’s final wishes.
Begin by collecting the trust instrument, deed records, beneficiary designations, bank statements, and any written instructions or correspondence that demonstrate the decedent’s intent. Documentation is the cornerstone of a successful petition, and locating these records early reduces delays. Include drafts or notes that illustrate consistent intent, and secure certified copies of deeds and account statements. Clear, dated records make it easier to build a narrative that supports trust ownership and helps the court understand the factual background without extended discovery or follow-up requests.
Undertake a comprehensive asset audit to identify any accounts, deeds, or retirement assets that were intended for the trust but never retitled. This audit should include bank accounts, real estate, retirement plans, life insurance policies, and smaller personal property that might be overlooked. A wide-ranging review prevents missed items from triggering future disputes, and it provides the factual foundation needed to draft targeted petitions and related filings. Thorough preparation reduces the need for additional court proceedings and helps ensure a complete resolution of funding issues.
Consider a Heggstad petition when documentation indicates the decedent intended certain property to be held by a trust but the asset remains in the decedent’s name. This situation commonly arises when deeds were not updated, bank accounts were not retitled, or beneficiary forms were not executed properly. A petition can align title with the trust, preserve the estate plan, and avoid probate for the affected assets. Families in Reedley often pursue this route to honor the decedent’s wishes and minimize court-supervised administration for assets that clearly belong to the trust.
Another reason to pursue a petition is when heirs are cooperative and supporting evidence is strong enough to persuade a court without extended litigation. If heirs agree on the decedent’s intent and documents support that intent, a Heggstad petition often resolves the issue efficiently. Conversely, if there are competing claims or unclear records, a more comprehensive plan may be required. Assessing the situation early helps determine whether a focused petition will succeed or whether additional steps are needed to secure appropriate distribution.
Common circumstances include a recently deceased trustmaker who prepared a trust but left one or more assets titled in their individual name, forgotten account retitling, or real property transferred incorrectly. Another frequent scenario is when a pour-over will was intended to funnel assets into a trust but the pour-over mechanism cannot operate without court clarification. These practical oversights create openings for petitions that help enforce the decedent’s plan and allow trustees to manage and distribute the property efficiently under trust terms.
Real estate is a common example of property that may be left outside a trust due to the complexity of deeds and recording requirements. When a deed remains in the decedent’s name and the trust instrument indicates the property should be trust-owned, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize the property as part of the trust. The process typically involves presenting the trust document, deed history, and any contemporaneous proof of intent, enabling subsequent recording of corrected title documents once the court issues its order.
Checking, savings, or investment accounts are frequently overlooked during trust funding, especially if institutions require specific paperwork to retitle accounts. When accounts remain in the decedent’s name, distributions under the trust may be delayed or subject to probate procedures. A petition can help establish that such accounts were intended to be managed by the trust, presenting bank records, beneficiary forms, and relevant correspondence to support the claim. Resolving these issues allows trustees to access funds necessary to pay expenses and carry out trust distributions.
Retirement accounts and life insurance policies sometimes have beneficiary designations that conflict with trust directions or were never updated to name the trust. When designations and trust terms are inconsistent, a Heggstad petition can be part of a larger strategy to clarify ownership and align distributions with intent. Documentation such as policy forms, beneficiary statements, and trust language can support requests for recognition of trust interests or for court authorization to transfer proceeds in accordance with the estate plan.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists Reedley residents and families across Fresno County who face trust funding defects, title uncertainties, and the need for court recognition of trust ownership. We help trustees, beneficiaries, and heirs evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, gather the necessary documentation, and present a petition that communicates the decedent’s intent. Our service area covers local court procedures and recording requirements so clients receive guidance tailored to California law and the specific needs of their estate planning matters.
We provide practical legal support focused on resolving funding issues and title defects efficiently. Our team works to assemble the records courts expect, drafts persuasive petitions, and manages notice requirements for interested parties. Clients receive clear guidance at every step, including an explanation of possible outcomes and timing. Because proper preparation reduces the risk of objections and delays, we emphasize thorough documentation and careful presentation to help trustees and families move assets into the trust in a way that reflects the decedent’s documented wishes.
Our approach includes a focused evaluation of each asset and a plan for addressing specific defects, whether the issue involves deeds, bank accounts, retirement accounts, or insurance proceeds. We coordinate with title companies and financial institutions when necessary and prepare court filings in line with local procedures. Communication with heirs and interested parties is handled with sensitivity to family dynamics, aiming to reduce conflict and protect estate value while enabling trustees to fulfill their obligations under the trust instrument and applicable law.
Clients also benefit from our familiarity with California probate and trust administration practices, which allows us to anticipate procedural needs such as notice periods, documentary requirements, and potential responses from interested persons. We strive to keep clients informed about timelines and likely next steps, and we pursue solutions that minimize court time and administrative cost. Whether a petition is straightforward or requires further investigation, our goal is to support families through a respectful and legally sound process that keeps trust assets moving toward distribution.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust documents and a targeted asset inventory to identify items not properly titled. We then collect deeds, account statements, and any evidence showing the decedent’s intention to place assets in the trust. After thorough documentation, we prepare the petition and supporting declarations, serve notice to interested parties, and file the matter with the appropriate probate court. We monitor the case for responses and, when necessary, present argument or negotiate resolutions that avoid contested hearings whenever possible.
The first step is a comprehensive review of the trust instrument and an audit of all assets to identify funding gaps. This involves examining deeds, titles, bank and brokerage statements, retirement account records, life insurance designations, and any other documents that may indicate intended trust ownership. We create a record checklist and work with clients to obtain certified copies and historical records that strengthen the case for trust recognition. This foundational work sets the stage for a focused and persuasive petition to the court.
Collecting the trust document, all relevant deeds, account statements, and any correspondence about the decedent’s intentions is critical. We request certified copies of deeds or historical title reports when needed, and we document any actions the decedent took that suggest the asset was meant to be in the trust. Consistent, dated records form the factual backbone of the petition and reduce the need for additional discovery or follow-up requests during court review.
Evidence of intent may include letters, estate planning notes, prior drafts of estate documents, and communications with financial institutions or advisers. We review all written materials to identify statements or actions that demonstrate the decedent’s plan for the asset. Compiling this evidence into clear declarations and exhibits helps the court see the logical connection between the trust document and the asset, increasing the likelihood of recognition of trust ownership without extensive litigation.
Once documents and evidence are assembled, we draft the petition with detailed factual statements and legal argument tailored to the property involved. The filing includes declarations and supporting exhibits that summarize relevant records. We ensure procedural requirements are met, draft a proposed order for the court to adopt, and arrange for service on interested parties. Careful drafting and correct filing practices reduce procedural risks and help the court efficiently evaluate the request to recognize the asset as trust property.
After filing, interested persons must be notified according to statutory requirements. We prepare notice documents, manage service, and track response deadlines. If objections arise, we assess whether those issues can be resolved through discussion or whether additional briefing is needed. Proactive notification and responsiveness to concerns help avoid surprises and can lead to negotiated resolutions that save time and expense for all parties involved.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the factual record and legal arguments showing why the asset should be treated as trust property. The requested court order can direct title changes or formally declare trust ownership, enabling subsequent recording of corrected titles. Where hearings are unnecessary because the record is uncontested, the court may sign the proposed order without appearance. Either way, the goal is to secure a clear, enforceable court determination to support trust administration.
Following court approval, we assist with implementing the order, which can include recording corrected deeds, updating account titles, and coordinating with financial institutions or title companies. These actions finalize the transfer of assets into the trust or recognize the trust’s interest. We also advise trustees on necessary recordkeeping and next steps for distribution, creditor handling, and trust administration. Proper follow-through ensures the court’s decision achieves its intended effect for beneficiaries.
Recording corrected deeds with the county recorder and providing court orders to banks and institutions completes the practical effect of the petition. We prepare the documents required for recording and coordinate with title companies to ensure that public records reflect the trust’s ownership. Updating account titles and beneficiary records where permitted finalizes funding and positions trustees to act in accordance with the trust terms, enabling distribution to beneficiaries without additional court intervention.
Once title matters are resolved, trustees can proceed with administrative duties such as paying debts, filing final accountings if required, and distributing assets to beneficiaries under the trust. We advise on appropriate documentation for each step, maintain records for future reference, and assist with any residual tasks to close the matter. The result is a more orderly trust administration that reflects the decedent’s plan and reduces the potential for later challenges.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to recognize that certain property belonged to a decedent’s trust even though it was never properly retitled. It is used when a trustmaker clearly intended for the trust to own an asset but administrative oversights left the property in the decedent’s name at death. The petition sets out the factual and documentary basis for recognition of the trust’s interest and proposes a court order to correct title. The remedy is focused and aims to align legal title with the decedent’s estate planning documents. This petition is appropriate when documentation exists that supports the decedent’s intent and when the affected property would otherwise be subject to probate administration. Courts evaluate the totality of evidence, including trust instruments, deeds, account statements, and correspondence. If the evidence is persuasive, the court may order title changes or declare that the asset belongs to the trust, allowing trustees to proceed with administration under the trust’s terms rather than through formal probate procedures.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies based on several factors, including the complexity of the assets, the thoroughness of supporting documentation, local court schedules, and whether parties contest the petition. When records are complete and no objections are raised, the process may be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a few months, largely depending on filing and hearing schedules. Preparing a well-documented petition and satisfying notice requirements helps avoid delays associated with supplemental discovery or procedural deficiencies. If interested parties object or if the court requires additional evidence, the matter can take longer because additional hearings or briefing may be necessary. The firm’s role in preparing a strong initial filing, coordinating service, and responding promptly to inquiries can reduce the time needed. Clients should plan for a range of timelines and remain prepared to supply additional records if requested by the court or other parties during the proceeding.
Courts look for evidence that demonstrates the decedent intended the trust to own the asset in question. The most persuasive items are the trust document itself, deeds referencing the trust, transfer documents, and contemporaneous communications showing intent to fund the trust. Bank statements, account records, and correspondence with financial institutions that indicate a plan to retitle accounts in trust can also be compelling. When multiple pieces of evidence point in the same direction, the court is more likely to recognize the trust relationship. Supplementing documentary evidence with clear, sworn declarations from witnesses or the trustee that explain the factual circumstances and intent can strengthen the petition. Records showing consistent behavior or instructions, even drafts of estate documents, may help bridge gaps. The combined strength of documentary proof and credible declarations makes the case more persuasive and reduces the likelihood of contested hearings.
A successful Heggstad petition can prevent a specific asset from being treated as part of the probate estate by securing a court declaration that the asset belonged to the trust. While this remedy addresses particular mis-titled property, it does not necessarily remove the need for probate in all situations. Whether probate is avoided entirely depends on the overall composition of the estate and whether other assets require probate administration. The petition focuses on bringing named assets under trust control to limit probate involvement for those items. In some cases, a petition can significantly reduce the scope of probate because an asset that would otherwise be administered through probate is recognized as trust property and handled under the trust terms. This outcome limits court-supervised distribution for the corrected assets, but families should evaluate all estate matters holistically to determine whether further probate steps remain necessary for other parts of the estate.
Statutory notice requirements must be followed when filing a Heggstad petition, and interested parties typically include heirs, beneficiaries, successors, and possibly creditors who have shown an interest in the decedent’s estate or the asset. The petition process requires serving these individuals with notice so they have an opportunity to review the filing and, if they choose, respond. Proper service reduces procedural risks and allows the court to consider any objections while maintaining fairness to all parties with potential interests. Determining who qualifies as an interested person depends on the particular facts and the estate documents involved. The petition outlines who will receive notice based on trust and probate rules, and the court verifies that service was completed according to requirements. Working carefully through the notice process helps avoid challenges based on faulty service and supports a smooth resolution of the petition.
Real property, bank and brokerage accounts, and certain personal property are among the most common items addressed through a Heggstad petition when they were intended to be part of a trust but remain titled in the decedent’s name. Retirement accounts and life insurance proceeds may present separate issues related to beneficiary designations, and while a petition can be part of a broader strategy for such assets, beneficiary forms and plan rules also influence outcomes. The petition is often used where clear evidence ties the asset to the trust’s intended ownership. Smaller tangible items and accounts intended to pass through a pour-over will may also be candidates for court recognition when retitling was overlooked. The specific procedural steps and required evidence vary based on the asset type, and sometimes coordination with financial institutions or title companies is needed to finalize the practical effect of the court’s order after a successful petition.
If an heir objects to a Heggstad petition, the court may schedule a hearing to consider the objection and any additional evidence. Objections can raise factual disputes about the decedent’s intent or legal arguments about ownership, and they may require further discovery, witness declarations, or supplemental filings. The presence of an objection can lengthen the process and increase the need for careful legal preparation to respond directly to the disputed issues with clear records and testimony. When objections arise, parties sometimes reach negotiated resolutions that avoid a contested hearing, such as stipulated orders or mediated agreements about title changes. Open communication and early identification of potential disputes can reduce contention, but when litigation is necessary, the court will weigh the evidence presented by both sides before issuing a decision. Representation aims to resolve objections efficiently while protecting the trust’s purpose and the decedent’s intentions.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include voluntary transfers by agreement among heirs, informal probate proceedings if probate is limited and uncontested, or administrative remedies involving title companies and financial institutions if those entities will accept documentation to correct titles without court orders. In some cases, informal resolution with clear documentation and cooperation from relevant institutions can correct title issues without court involvement. However, when institutions or heirs refuse to cooperate, a court petition may be the most reliable method to obtain a definitive legal ruling. Another alternative is to pursue a full probate or other statutory procedure depending on the asset type and family circumstances. Each option carries trade-offs in cost, time, and privacy. Evaluating these alternatives with attention to the strength of documentation and the likelihood of objections helps determine whether a petition or another route best achieves the decedent’s estate planning goals.
A Heggstad petition primarily addresses property title and trust recognition rather than beneficiary designations on retirement accounts. Retirement plans and insurance proceeds are often governed by plan documents and contract law, which may prevail over trust language if a beneficiary designation is valid and current. When retirement accounts name beneficiaries inconsistent with the trust, additional steps or separate legal approaches may be required to align distributions with the estate plan. A petition can be part of a larger strategy but may not alone change plan designation outcomes. Where retirement plan rules permit or where evidence shows the plan’s intent was to fund the trust, a court’s recognition of trust ownership can assist in coordinating outcomes. However, each account’s rules must be reviewed carefully, and coordination with plan administrators is often necessary. Clients should expect a case-by-case analysis to determine whether a petition will affect the disposition of retirement or insurance proceeds in their particular situation.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary depending on the complexity of the estate, the number and type of assets involved, the need for title reports or certified documents, and whether disputes arise that require hearings or discovery. Basic petitions with clear documentation and no objections generally cost less than contested matters that involve additional filings, court appearances, or expert reports. Court filing fees, service of process costs, and recording fees for corrected deeds are typical out-of-pocket expenses associated with the process. Because costs can increase if interested persons object or if extensive documentation is required, many clients benefit from an initial assessment to estimate potential expenses and timeline. Early preparation and careful document gathering reduce procedural delays and can lower overall cost by minimizing the need for supplemental filings or hearings. Discussing likely scenarios and fee structures upfront helps families plan for the financial aspects of pursuing a petition.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas