A trust modification petition allows interested parties to request court approval to change the terms of an existing trust when circumstances have evolved since the trust was created. In Humboldt County and nearby areas like Hydesville, changes in family dynamics, beneficiary needs, tax considerations, or drafting errors may make modification necessary. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients in evaluating whether a petition is appropriate, preparing the required filings, and pursuing resolutions that align with a client’s goals while respecting the rights of beneficiaries. This introduction explains the basic concept and when a petition becomes an available path.
Determining whether to pursue a trust modification petition starts with careful review of the trust document and an assessment of the relevant legal standards in California. Not all trusts can be altered easily; some require beneficiary consent while others may permit court involvement if circumstances warrant. A modification petition can address problems such as ambiguous language, changed tax law, or changed health or support needs of beneficiaries. This paragraph outlines how parties begin the process, what evidence is commonly needed, and the importance of clear objectives before filing to avoid unnecessary time and expense.
A trust modification petition can preserve the settlor’s intent while adapting the plan to present realities; it provides legal authority to correct mistakes, clarify ambiguities, and respond to major life events like divorce, disability, or a beneficiary’s changed needs. Through a petition, the court can authorize adjustments that protect assets, reduce tax exposure, and ensure that distributions reflect current circumstances. For trustees and beneficiaries, this process reduces the risk of future disputes by creating a clear, enforceable record of the change. The practical benefit is a trust that functions effectively for its beneficiaries and aligns with current legal and financial conditions.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused estate planning services tailored to California law, including advice and representation on trust modification petitions. Our approach emphasizes careful document review, clear communication with clients, and thorough preparation of pleadings to present a persuasive case to the court. We guide clients through each stage of the process, from evaluating legal options to negotiating with interested parties and presenting necessary evidence. Clients can expect practical, solution-oriented representation designed to resolve trust issues efficiently while protecting family relationships and trust assets.
A trust modification petition typically begins with identifying the legal basis for change under California law, such as a changed circumstance, an unforeseen event, or a drafting error. The petition must demonstrate to the court why modification serves the trust’s purpose or is otherwise warranted. Interested parties will need to provide documentary evidence, such as the original trust instrument, related financial records, and any communications illustrating the settlor’s intent. Notice to beneficiaries is required so they may object or consent. The court evaluates the petition against statutory standards and case law before granting relief.
Not every requested change will be approved; courts balance the settlor’s original intent against present needs and legal constraints. When beneficiaries consent, modifications are often straightforward and can sometimes be accomplished outside of court. Where consent is absent or disputes arise, a petition lays out the legal and factual justification for change and asks the court to authorize a modification. The process can include discovery, depositions, and hearings if contested, and outcomes can range from negotiated settlements to judicial orders that revise the trust terms in specific ways.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate or superior court asking a judge to change the terms of a trust. Reasons for a petition vary but commonly include correcting errors, adjusting for changes in tax law, fixing drafting mistakes, addressing beneficiary incapacity, or implementing a settlor’s later-expressed wishes when formal amendment procedures were not followed. The petition outlines the requested changes, explains why they are appropriate under the circumstances, and provides legal authority or precedent to support the court’s intervention. The court then decides whether to grant, deny, or modify the requested relief.
Filing a trust modification petition involves drafting a clear petition that identifies the trust, the parties, the requested changes, and the factual and legal grounds supporting modification. Essential elements include proof of notice to beneficiaries, supporting declarations or affidavits, a proposed order for the judge, and any exhibits like the original trust document. The process typically includes service and notice, possible mediation or settlement discussions, and court hearings if needed. Proper documentation and credible testimony can make the difference between a smooth approval and a prolonged dispute.
Understanding common terms helps parties navigate the petition process. Definitions clarify roles such as settlor, trustee, and beneficiary, and explain legal concepts like consent, cy pres, and reformation. Familiarity with these terms helps clients and trustees recognize what supporting documents are relevant, how notice should be given, and what statutory standards apply. This section introduces the most frequently encountered terms, their practical significance in modification actions, and how they affect strategy and likely outcomes in court.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and set the original terms. In the context of a modification petition, courts look to the settlor’s intent as a primary guide. Evidence of the settlor’s intent can include the trust document itself, earlier estate planning documents, draft notes, and communications. When the settlor is still competent and available, their consent or clarification may streamline a modification without court intervention. When the settlor is deceased or incapacitated, the court relies on objective sources and legal standards to interpret intent and determine whether a modification is appropriate.
Reformation refers to a judicial remedy that changes the written terms of a trust to reflect what the settlor actually intended when the document was drafted, typically because of a drafting error or mutual mistake. To succeed, petitioners generally must show clear and convincing evidence that the written instrument does not reflect the true agreement. Reformation differs from amendment because it corrects a mistake rather than implementing a new decision by the settlor. Courts use reformation when strict enforcement of the document would defeat the settlor’s original purpose.
The trustee is the person or institution responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the trust’s provisions for the benefit of beneficiaries. Trustees must follow fiduciary duties, including acting in beneficiaries’ best interests and administering the trust according to its terms and applicable law. In a modification petition, a trustee may be a petitioner or a respondent depending on whether the trustee supports the change. Trustees also play a key role in providing records, accountings, and testimony that help the court understand the trust’s operation and the reasons for proposed modifications.
Beneficiary consent occurs when all beneficiaries entitled to notice agree to the proposed modification, which can allow changes to proceed without court approval in some cases. Full consent often streamlines the process and reduces costs and delay, but consent must be knowledgeable and properly documented. When not all beneficiaries agree, a petition seeks court approval and the court evaluates both the objecting and consenting parties’ positions. The court weighs consent heavily but ultimately ensures that the change aligns with legal standards and the settlor’s intent.
When addressing a problematic trust provision, parties can pursue several routes. If the settlor is available and competent, a formal amendment signed according to the trust terms is usually the best option. When the document contains mistakes or ambiguous language, reformation may be appropriate and seeks to correct the writing to reflect the original intent. If beneficiaries disagree or the settlor is unavailable, a court petition for modification is the route to obtain binding judicial authority. Each option has different evidence requirements, timelines, and risks, and the right choice depends on the case specifics.
If the settlor remains alive and has the capacity to make decisions, executing a formal amendment is often the simplest path. An amendment can be drafted to address a single clause or a small set of provisions and signed under the procedures the trust requires. This approach avoids court involvement, limits costs, and preserves privacy. Even when beneficiaries might prefer a court order, a settlor’s clearly documented amendment that follows the trust’s amendment process typically provides a legally enforceable change without the need for litigation or public filings.
When beneficiaries who are entitled to notice unanimously agree on a change, they can often effect that change through written, signed consents or a stipulated settlement that avoids a contested court process. This pathway reduces legal fees and speeds resolution while maintaining family privacy. Careful attention must be paid to documenting consent properly and ensuring that parties understand the implications of the change. Legal review is still important to confirm that the proposed change is legally valid and that the consent procedure meets statutory and trust requirements.
Comprehensive representation becomes necessary when beneficiaries dispute the proposed changes, when evidence is contested, or when legal questions such as trust validity or interpretation are central. In these situations, preparation for potential hearings, discovery, and litigation strategy is important to protect clients’ positions. A full-service approach includes drafting persuasive pleadings, obtaining and organizing documentary evidence, preparing witness declarations, and, if necessary, presenting oral argument to the court to advocate for a favorable resolution.
When proposed modifications could materially affect tax outcomes, asset protection, or distribution schemes, a comprehensive legal approach helps evaluate long-term implications and coordinate with financial and tax advisors. Complex changes to trusts that hold business interests, retirement accounts, or significant real property require careful planning to avoid unintended tax liabilities or creditor exposure. Full representation can ensure that the modification is drafted and implemented in a way that achieves the client’s objectives while minimizing negative consequences for beneficiaries and the trust estate.
A comprehensive approach ensures that a proposed trust change is legally sound, clearly documented, and strategically aligned with broader estate planning goals. It reduces the chance of future disputes by addressing potential objections and by creating a robust record that explains why the change reflects the trust’s purpose. Comprehensive planning can coordinate trust modification with related documents such as wills, powers of attorney, and health care directives to maintain consistency across estate planning instruments and avoid gaps or conflicts that cause confusion down the road.
By integrating trust modification with broader financial and family considerations, a thorough approach offers durable solutions that protect beneficiaries and preserve assets. This method provides flexibility to craft tailored remedies, whether that means limited wording changes, reallocation of trust assets, or court-ordered adjustments that reflect changed circumstances. The result is a trust structure that meets contemporary needs while minimizing litigation risk and administrative friction for trustees and heirs over time.
A carefully documented modification reduces ambiguity and makes trustee duties clearer, which in turn lowers the likelihood of later challenges. When the reasons for the change are clearly recorded and legally validated, beneficiaries have less basis to claim surprise or misunderstanding. The comprehensive approach anticipates potential areas of conflict by addressing notice, consent documentation, and technical legal standards up front. This preventive work protects the trust’s integrity and helps ensure smoother administration and distribution for current and future beneficiaries.
When modifications are coordinated with related estate planning documents, the entire plan functions more coherently, reducing gaps and inconsistencies that might otherwise cause problems. Aligning trust terms with retirement accounts, powers of attorney, and healthcare directives ensures beneficiaries receive intended benefits without unintended tax consequences or administrative hurdles. This holistic perspective helps maintain continuity across generational planning and provides family members and fiduciaries with a clear, actionable roadmap for administration and distribution under current law.
Collecting the original trust document, any amendments, related wills, powers of attorney, and records of trustee actions is a crucial early step. Having a comprehensive file helps clarify what changes are needed and demonstrates the historical context for the court or for beneficiary discussions. If there were drafts or communications about the settlor’s intentions, include those as they may be relevant to showing intent. Organized documentation saves time, reduces the cost of legal work, and helps present a persuasive factual record when preparing a petition or negotiating a settlement.
Before seeking modifications to trusts that hold substantial assets or retirement accounts, account for potential tax consequences and impacts on creditor claims. Coordination with financial and tax advisors helps craft solutions that meet the client’s goals without triggering adverse results. Understanding the financial picture can also shape negotiation strategy and help the court evaluate the reasonableness of proposed changes. Advance consideration of these matters often produces more durable and effective outcomes for beneficiaries and trustees alike.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust’s terms no longer reflect current circumstances or when a drafting error threatens the settlor’s intended distribution plan. Life events such as divorce, remarriage, death of a beneficiary, changes in tax law, sale of significant assets, or a beneficiary’s incapacity can justify court-sanctioned changes. A petition is also appropriate when beneficiaries disagree and court resolution is needed to produce conclusive authority. Before filing, evaluate alternatives like amendment or beneficiary consent to determine the most efficient path.
A petition may also be necessary when a trustee faces uncertainty about how to carry out the trust or when conflicting instructions create administrative difficulties. Courts can interpret ambiguous language, correct mistakes, or issue orders that clarify trustee powers and duties. This is particularly important for trusts that oversee ongoing support arrangements, management of business interests, or distributions contingent on changing circumstances. Seeking a judicial determination can provide the clarity needed for responsible administration and reduce potential liability for fiduciaries.
Typical circumstances include discovery of drafting errors, ambiguous provisions, changed family situations, newly identified disability or special needs of a beneficiary, tax law changes affecting the trust, or conflicts among beneficiaries. Other triggers are the emergence of previously unknown assets or changes in asset values that require a different allocation strategy. When these or similar events occur and stakeholders cannot reach agreement, a trust modification petition becomes a practical tool to resolve disputes and align the trust document with present-day realities.
Errors in the drafting of a trust, such as inconsistent provisions or vague beneficiary descriptions, often create confusion and may undermine the settlor’s intent. When such mistakes are discovered, reformation or a modification petition can clarify the settlor’s original purpose and correct the written instrument. The court will evaluate evidence showing the intended meaning, which may include prior drafts and communications. Correcting these issues helps trustees administer the trust effectively and reduces the potential for future disputes among beneficiaries.
Life changes like divorce, remarriage, death, or significant shifts in financial status can render the original trust provisions inappropriate. A petition may be needed to adjust distributions, trustee powers, or guardianship nominations in response to the new reality. Courts assess whether modifications are consistent with the trust’s central purpose while ensuring fairness to beneficiaries. Addressing these developments through a formal process ensures decisions are legally enforceable and reduces future administrative uncertainty for trustees.
When a beneficiary develops a disability or ongoing care needs, trust terms may need to be adapted to provide appropriate support while preserving eligibility for public benefits where applicable. Modifications can establish specialized distribution plans, create subtrusts, or adjust trustee powers to permit more flexible management of funds. Courts carefully consider such changes to ensure they serve the beneficiary’s best interests and align with the settlor’s intent. Properly tailored arrangements can enhance care and financial stability for vulnerable beneficiaries.
Residents of Hydesville and surrounding Humboldt County communities can seek local representation to navigate trust modification matters under California law. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides personalized attention to each case, ensuring clients understand their options, timelines, and likely outcomes. Local counsel is familiar with county procedures and can handle necessary filings, service, and appearances in regional courts. We work to manage disputes efficiently while protecting client interests and preserving family relationships where possible throughout the modification process.
Our firm focuses on practical solutions for estate planning and trust administration matters, including modification petitions. We guide clients through the full process from case assessment to court filings, mediation, and hearings when necessary. The goal is to achieve outcomes that reflect the settlor’s intent, serve beneficiaries’ needs, and maintain legal clarity for trustees. Our representation emphasizes thorough preparation, direct communication, and cost-effective strategies to reduce delay and potential conflict during resolution.
We assist clients with document collection, drafting of petitions and proposed orders, and managing notice and service requirements. Where disputes exist, we engage in negotiation and settlement discussions aimed at avoiding protracted litigation. If the case proceeds to court, we present the factual record and legal arguments needed for an informed judicial decision. Throughout, our focus remains on protecting client goals while minimizing disruption to family relationships and trust administration responsibilities.
Clients receive clear explanations of the likely timelines, procedural steps, and potential costs associated with a petition. We coordinate with financial and tax advisors when needed to address broader planning concerns and to craft modifications that are practical and sustainable. Our aim is to deliver durable solutions that protect assets and beneficiaries, and to help trustees administer the trust in a manner consistent with both legal requirements and the settlor’s desires.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and document review to determine whether a petition is appropriate or whether alternatives like amendment or beneficiary consent are available. We then prepare a strategy, gather supporting documents, and draft the necessary pleadings and proposed orders. We handle proper notice to interested parties and engage in settlement discussions where possible. If litigation is required, we manage discovery, declarations, and courtroom presentations with careful attention to procedural and evidentiary requirements to pursue the best possible outcome.
The first step is to evaluate the trust, related estate planning documents, and the facts that justify a modification. This includes identifying interested parties, gathering drafts or correspondence that reflect the settlor’s intent, and assembling financial records. We analyze statutory law and relevant case precedents to determine the best legal basis for seeking a modification. Clear identification of objectives and evidence helps streamline preparation and improves the likelihood of a favorable court determination or negotiated resolution.
In the initial meeting, we listen to the client’s objectives, review the trust documents, and discuss possible solutions. We explain legal standards and potential pathways, including amendment, reformation, or a court petition, along with likely timelines and costs. This stage sets priorities and helps determine whether immediate action is needed to preserve rights or whether a measured approach is preferable. Clear goal-setting at the outset informs the drafting of the petition and the evidence collection plan.
We compile the trust instrument, all amendments, related wills, powers of attorney, and any relevant communications or drafts. Where beneficiary incapacity or changed circumstances are at issue, we obtain medical or financial records as needed. Properly assembled evidence supports the factual narrative in the petition and reduces the need for last-minute discovery. Detailed records and organized exhibits facilitate effective pleadings and present a clear case to the court or to opposing parties during settlement discussions.
After preparing the petition and supporting documents, we file with the appropriate court and ensure all required parties receive notice. California procedure requires proper service and an opportunity for beneficiaries to respond. We open channels for negotiation and mediation to seek consensual resolutions when possible, aiming to avoid contested hearings. When settlement is not achievable, we prepare and respond to motions, handle discovery disputes, and take steps necessary to present the matter effectively at hearing or trial.
Proper service and strict compliance with procedural rules are essential to a successful petition. We prepare proofs of service and ensure that all notice requirements are met in accordance with California law. Attention to these formalities prevents challenges based on technical grounds and allows the court to proceed on the merits. Accurate service also gives beneficiaries the opportunity to review the proposed changes and engage in constructive dialogue or raise objections that the court can consider.
Where disagreements exist, we pursue mediation and settlement as efficient alternatives to drawn-out hearings. Through guided negotiation and frank exchange of documentation, parties often reach compromises that preserve relationships and reduce costs. If mediation succeeds, we prepare stipulated orders or settlement agreements for the court’s approval. When parties cannot agree, we shift focus to preparing for hearing with a comprehensive evidentiary record and legal argumentation ready for presentation.
If settlement is not achieved, we present the petition at a court hearing and argue for the requested modifications based on the record and applicable law. The court may issue an order granting, denying, or altering the relief sought. Once an order is obtained, we assist with implementation steps such as revising trust documents, notifying financial institutions, and updating related estate planning instruments. Proper implementation ensures that the trust functions according to the new terms and that beneficiaries and fiduciaries understand their roles.
Preparation for a hearing includes completing witness declarations, compiling exhibits, and anticipating likely objections from other parties. We organize the factual and legal evidence to present a coherent narrative that supports the requested modification. Clear courtroom presentation and well-prepared documentation help judges understand the reasons for change and the practical consequences. Our preparation addresses both substantive legal arguments and the evidentiary foundation necessary to secure a favorable order when appropriate.
After the court issues its order, we assist with finalizing revised trust documents, preparing certified copies of the order for filing, and communicating changes to financial institutions, trustees, and beneficiaries as needed. We ensure successor trustees and fiduciaries have clear guidance for administration under the new terms. Proper follow-up is essential to make the court’s decision effective in practice and to prevent administrative confusion that could lead to future disputes or claims against fiduciaries.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the court to alter the terms of an existing trust when circumstances make change necessary or appropriate. Common reasons to file include correcting drafting mistakes, addressing changed family circumstances, adjusting distributions because of beneficiary needs, or resolving ambiguities that prevent effective administration. The petition explains the requested changes, the factual basis for those changes, and the legal authority supporting intervention, and it provides the court with the information needed to make a decision that aligns with the trust’s purpose. Filing a petition is often pursued when the settlor is unavailable to execute an amendment, when beneficiaries disagree, or when a change has substantial consequences requiring court approval. The court will consider evidence such as the original trust document, relevant communications, and records that illustrate the settlor’s intent or changed circumstances. When successful, a petition creates an enforceable order that clarifies or revises trust terms to resolve uncertainty and guide administration going forward.
Interested parties who have legal standing may file a petition to modify a trust, including trustees, beneficiaries, and sometimes other individuals with a direct interest in the trust’s administration. Trustees may petition to obtain clarity about their powers or to correct issues that impede effective management. Beneficiaries may petition when the trust’s terms no longer meet their needs or when conflicts arise among beneficiaries that require judicial resolution. The precise scope of who may file depends on the trust terms and California procedural rules. When deciding whether to file, it is important to confirm eligibility and to provide proof of interest in the trust’s outcome. Proper notice to all required parties is essential, and lack of proper standing or failure to serve interested parties can derail a petition. Early evaluation of who must be included and how to document standing prevents procedural problems and helps the court consider the petition on the merits.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies based on case complexity, whether parties consent, and whether the matter proceeds to hearing. If beneficiaries agree or the settlor can amend the trust directly, the process can be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months. Contested petitions that require discovery, expert information, or evidentiary hearings typically take several months and sometimes longer, depending on court schedules and the need for additional proceedings. Local court calendars in Humboldt County and surrounding jurisdictions influence how quickly a petition can be heard. Efficient case management, early settlement discussions, and complete documentation can shorten the timeline. Conversely, disputes over factual issues or competing legal theories can extend the process. Discussing realistic timeframes during the initial case assessment helps set appropriate expectations and plan next steps.
Yes, a court can order a change to a trust even if not all beneficiaries agree, provided the petitioner establishes a legal basis for modification under California law. When beneficiaries are divided, the court weighs the settlor’s intent, statutory standards, and the impact of the proposed change on those entitled to distributions. The court seeks to ensure fairness and that the modification aligns with the trust’s underlying purpose, balancing competing interests while providing clarity for administration. In contested matters, the proceeding focuses on the legal grounds for modification, evidence of intent or mistake, and the practical consequences of change. Beneficiaries who object will have the opportunity to present opposing evidence and arguments. The judiciary then determines whether to grant all or part of the requested relief, modify the proposed terms, or deny the petition based on the record and applicable law.
Evidence supporting a petition for reformation commonly includes the original trust instrument and any drafts or prior versions that show what the settlor intended. Communications such as letters, emails, or notes that reflect the settlor’s wishes can be persuasive. Financial documents, account statements, and records of trustee actions that demonstrate how the trust has been administered may also help show that the written document fails to reflect the settlor’s true intent or contains a drafting mistake. Affidavits or declarations from knowledgeable witnesses who recall discussions with the settlor or who participated in planning sessions can strengthen a reformation claim. Medical or mental capacity records may be relevant if competence at the time of signing is at issue. The court typically requires convincing and coherent evidence linking the requested change to the settlor’s actual intent or a demonstrable mistake in the document.
Alternatives to filing a court petition include direct amendment by the settlor when they are available and capable, or obtaining written consent from all beneficiaries entitled to notice. When unanimous beneficiary agreement exists, parties can document the modification through signed consents or a stipulated settlement that achieves the desired result without public litigation. Such consensual approaches can be faster, less expensive, and preserve family privacy compared with contested court proceedings. Mediation and negotiation are also viable options when disagreements exist but parties wish to avoid a contested hearing. Skilled negotiation can often produce compromises that meet the core needs of involved parties. Even when these alternatives are pursued, legal review is important to ensure that the agreed changes comply with statutory requirements and that documentation is properly executed to prevent later challenges.
Costs for a trust modification petition depend on the complexity of the issues, the number of parties involved, and whether the matter is contested. When parties reach agreement or the settlor’s amendment suffices, costs are limited to document preparation and filing fees. Contested matters incur higher fees due to discovery, motion practice, attorney time for preparing declarations and court pleadings, and potential hearing time. Court filing fees and costs for certified copies of orders and service are additional expenses to consider. Engaging in early case assessment and attempting negotiation or mediation can reduce total costs. Transparent communication about likely fees and milestones helps clients make informed decisions about proceeding. In some cases, parties may agree to allocate costs or pursue alternatives that reduce the financial burden while achieving acceptable results for beneficiaries and trustees.
Modifying a trust can affect a beneficiary’s eligibility for public benefits if the change alters how assets are held or distributed. For beneficiaries who rely on means-tested programs, adjustments that increase available resources or create accessible distributions could jeopardize benefits. When special needs or public benefits are a concern, modifications can be structured to preserve eligibility by creating separate subtrusts or tailored distribution mechanisms that shield funds from being counted for eligibility purposes. Coordinating with a benefits planner or financial advisor helps craft language and mechanisms that support the beneficiary while protecting access to needed programs. Courts are often receptive to modifications that both reflect the settlor’s intent and preserve critical public benefits for vulnerable beneficiaries. Thoughtful planning ensures the trust modification achieves caregiving goals without unintended harm to benefit eligibility.
Yes, trustee powers and duties can sometimes be adjusted through a trust modification petition when the current terms impede effective administration or no longer serve the trust’s purposes. The court may clarify ambiguous trustee powers, add or limit authorities, or make orders that facilitate prudent management of trust assets. Such changes can address problems like lack of investment authority, inability to sell property, or restrictions that prevent timely decision-making in trustees’ discharge of duties. Before seeking judicial action, trustees should document the practical issues encountered and attempts to resolve them, as the court will want to see why modification is necessary. When changes are granted, the court’s order becomes part of the enforceable trust record and provides trustees with the legal backing needed to administer the trust consistent with the new terms and duties.
For an initial meeting about a trust modification, bring the original trust document and any amendments, related wills or trusts, powers of attorney, and records of trustee actions. Include correspondence, drafts, or notes that reflect the settlor’s intent, as well as financial statements and asset inventories related to the trust. Bringing contact information for beneficiaries and trustees, and a timeline of relevant events, helps create a complete picture for case evaluation. Also prepare a list of objectives and concerns, such as desired changes, feared outcomes, or known objections from others. This information helps shape strategy, identify necessary evidence, and estimate timelines and costs. Clear documentation at the outset streamlines the assessment process and allows for more focused advice on whether to pursue amendment, negotiated resolution, or a court petition.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas