A Heggstad petition is a legal action used in California to transfer assets into a trust when title was not properly retitled during trust funding. Clients in Seeley often face delays or uncertainty when assets remain in their individual names after a trust is signed. This introduction explains how a Heggstad petition works, who typically seeks one, and what outcomes the court can authorize. The process seeks to confirm that the decedent or trustmaker intended the asset to be part of the trust to avoid a full probate administration and to allow the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms.
Many families in Imperial County discover an asset was never transferred into a trust after the trustmaker passes away or becomes incapacitated, creating administrative barriers and delays. A Heggstad petition can resolve this by asking the court to declare that a particular asset should be treated as trust property based on the trustmaker’s intent and surrounding evidence. This remedy can streamline estate administration, protect privacy, and reduce costs compared with full probate. The firm helps clients gather documentation and prepare persuasive petition materials to present a clear record to the court.
Filing a Heggstad petition can prevent unnecessary probate and enable the trustee to carry out the trustmaker’s wishes without prolonged court oversight. The petition identifies assets that should be treated as trust property and provides the court with factual evidence such as trust documents, declarations, and transaction records. For families in Seeley, this often means faster access to funds, clearer authority for the trustee to manage property, and reduced legal expense over time. Thoughtful preparation of the petition and supporting documentation increases the likelihood the court will accept the requested relief and promptly transfer the asset into the trust estate.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist clients across California with trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions, settlement matters, and related filings. We focus on clear communication, careful document review, and organized presentation of evidence to support a petition. Our approach emphasizes client education about the petition process, realistic timelines, and practical strategies to resolve title issues while minimizing court involvement. For Seeley residents, that means a dedicated process to identify assets, prepare declarations, and handle court filings so families can move forward with trust administration promptly.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that a specific asset belongs to a trust even though the title or account name was not formally changed. The petition relies on evidence showing the trustmaker’s intent, such as the trust document, beneficiary designations, transfer documents, or contemporaneous correspondence. The court evaluates whether the trustmaker intended the asset to be part of the trust and whether equitable principles support treating it as trust property. This remedy is intended to honor the trustmaker’s intent and to allow trustees to administer assets without the time and expense of a full probate estate.
The procedural steps include gathering documentation, drafting the petition and supporting declarations, serving interested parties if required, and attending a court hearing if necessary. In many cases, careful documentation and negotiation can lead to a streamlined process without contested litigation, while contested matters may require additional legal argument and evidence. The petitioner must be prepared to show clear indicia of intent and any relevant steps taken to fund the trust. Working closely with legal counsel helps ensure paperwork is organized and presented in a manner the court can readily evaluate.
A Heggstad petition requests a judicial declaration that a particular asset should be treated as part of a trust based on the trustmaker’s demonstrated intent. The petition typically includes the trust instrument, evidence of the trustmaker’s ownership, documentation of attempts to retitle or fund the asset, and statements from individuals with knowledge of the trustmaker’s intent. The relief requested can include an order directing the property be considered trust property so the trustee may manage, transfer, or distribute it under the trust’s terms. The remedy addresses the practical problem of overlooked or mis-titled assets during trust funding.
To succeed with a Heggstad petition, the petition must show evidence of the trustmaker’s intent and a connection between the asset and the trust. Useful evidence includes the trust agreement, beneficiary designations consistent with the trust, bank or transfer records, and testimony or declarations from people familiar with the trustmaker’s planning. The petition should explain why the asset was not retitled and any steps already taken to correct title. Clear organization of documents and persuasive factual narratives are essential to help the court determine whether the trustmaker intended the asset to be part of the trust estate.
Understanding common terms used in trust and probate matters helps clients follow the Heggstad petition process and make informed decisions. This section defines frequently used words and concepts so clients can recognize what documentation and testimony will be most relevant. Clear definitions help reduce confusion about roles such as trustee and beneficiary, and about procedures such as filing petitions, serving notices, and obtaining court orders. Familiarity with these terms improves communication with counsel and promotes a smoother resolution when title issues arise with a trust.
The settlor, sometimes called the trustmaker, is the person who created the trust and transferred or intended to transfer assets into it. Demonstrating the settlor’s intent is central to a Heggstad petition, because the court must determine whether the settlor intended a particular asset to be part of the trust. Evidence might include the trust document itself, notes or correspondence, beneficiary designations that align with the trust, or witness declarations. Clear proof about the settlor’s intentions and actions is often the most persuasive factor in obtaining a favorable court ruling on the petition.
The trustee is the individual or entity appointed under the trust instrument to manage, conserve, and distribute trust assets according to the trust’s instructions. When a Heggstad petition is filed, the trustee may be the petitioner seeking authority to treat a mis-titled asset as trust property so it can be administered under the trust terms. The trustee’s role includes gathering documentation, making decisions in the beneficiaries’ best interests, and possibly appearing in court to explain the trustmaker’s intent and the steps taken to fund the trust. The trustee must act within fiduciary duties under California law.
A beneficiary is a person or entity designated in a trust to receive income or principal from trust assets. Beneficiaries may be affected by a Heggstad petition because the petition determines whether an asset is controlled by the trust and therefore subject to distribution rules the trustmaker established. Beneficiaries sometimes receive notice of the petition and may have the opportunity to object or provide evidence regarding the trustmaker’s intent. Understanding beneficiaries’ rights and how the trust distributes assets is important when preparing a petition to avoid disputes and ensure proper administration.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering an estate of a deceased person when assets are not held in trust or otherwise bypass probate. One benefit of a successful Heggstad petition is that it can allow specific assets to be treated as trust property, reducing the scope of probate or avoiding it for those assets. When assets remain improperly titled, probate may be required to establish authority to transfer them; a Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that can streamline administration and reduce the need for full probate proceedings for those assets.
When an asset was not retitled to a trust, families can consider several options: informal transfer with beneficiary cooperation, filing a Heggstad petition, or opening a probate estate. Each option has trade-offs in time, cost, and privacy. Informal agreements may work if all parties cooperate, but documents alone may not provide legal authority for the trustee. A Heggstad petition offers a court declaration focused on the asset’s intended ownership, avoiding a full probate if successful. Probate provides broader authority but can be longer, more public, and more expensive than targeted petitions, so understanding the relative merits is essential when selecting a path.
A limited approach may be appropriate when beneficiaries and interested parties all agree that an asset should be treated as trust property and are willing to sign documents to effect the transfer. In such situations, informal transfers or corrective documents can avoid court involvement and reduce cost and delay. However, this path requires clear communication and full disclosure among all parties to prevent future disputes. Written agreements, clear documentation of the trustmaker’s intent, and accurate updates to account records are important steps to avoid the need for a formal petition or probate proceedings down the line.
When the failure to retitle is the result of a simple administrative oversight and there is strong documentation of the trustmaker’s intent, the parties may be able to correct title through lender or account procedures without court intervention. Examples include accounts where beneficiary designations match the trust terms or where a bank will accept a trust certification and new account paperwork. Even when informal correction is possible, careful preservation of evidence and written confirmations reduce the risk of later challenges and ensure the trustee has documented authority to manage the asset.
Comprehensive legal action is often required when ownership is disputed, when beneficiaries contest whether an asset should be part of the trust, or when there are competing claims from creditors or family members. In these cases, a court declaration through a Heggstad petition helps clarify title and provides legal authority for the trustee to act. Preparing for contested matters includes gathering robust evidence, anticipating opposing arguments, and presenting the trustmaker’s intent in a clear factual narrative to the court to support the requested relief.
When asset histories are complex, documentation is missing, or transfers occurred many years earlier, professional legal assistance is often necessary to reconstruct the record and build a persuasive case for the court. This may include obtaining account records, tracing transfers, and drafting declarations that explain the context of the transaction. A formal petition can allow the court to evaluate all available evidence and issue an order that resolves lingering title issues, enabling the trustee to administer the asset under the trust and minimizing the likelihood of future disputes.
A comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition can provide finality and legal certainty by obtaining a court order that declares an asset to be part of the trust. This reduces the risk of later challenges by providing formal adjudication rather than relying solely on informal agreements. Court-ordered resolution helps trustees exercise clear authority to manage, invest, or distribute assets according to the trust terms. For families seeking to conclude administration efficiently and with more predictability, a carefully prepared petition and comprehensive presentation of factors in support of the trustmaker’s intent can be highly beneficial.
Beyond legal finality, a comprehensive strategy can protect privacy by limiting the need for broader probate proceedings and can save costs over the long run by avoiding protracted disputes. The court’s declaration allows third parties such as financial institutions to accept the trustee’s authority with greater confidence, facilitating prompt transfer and management of assets. Thoughtful preparation reduces the risk of appeals or re-litigation, enabling beneficiaries to receive distributions according to the trustmaker’s plan with minimal delay when compared to contested probate.
One important benefit of securing a court order through a petition is that it gives the trustee explicit authority to manage and transfer assets under the trust’s terms. This clarity helps third parties such as banks, title companies, and retirement plan administrators accept the trustee’s instructions without additional hesitation. For trustees in Seeley and across Imperial County, such authority reduces delays in administration and decreases the likelihood of vendors or institutions requesting additional legal proof before releasing funds or retitling property in the trust’s name.
A court-declared transfer limits grounds for future disputes by memorializing findings about the trustmaker’s intent, which can discourage subsequent challenges from heirs or creditors. Final court orders can serve as authoritative evidence in later proceedings and provide peace of mind to beneficiaries and trustees that the matter has been resolved according to the trustmaker’s plan. By reducing uncertainty, families can focus on the trust’s distribution plan and on settling outstanding obligations rather than resolving contested title questions over many years.
Begin collecting trust documents, account statements, deeds, emails, and notes that show the trustmaker’s intent as soon as a mis-titled asset is identified. Early collection preserves records and reduces the time needed to prepare a persuasive petition. Statements from individuals who witnessed the trustmaker’s planning or actions can also be valuable. The more complete and organized the evidence, the easier it will be to present a coherent narrative to the court that demonstrates the asset should be treated as trust property, which can help shorten timelines and reduce the risk of contested disputes.
Maintain records of any steps taken to retitle accounts or property, including letters to banks, deeds, and account change forms, even if the funding was not completed. These records can demonstrate the trustmaker’s direction and actions taken to fund the trust, which supports a Heggstad petition. Showing attempts to correct title helps the court understand the context of the omission and can strengthen the argument that the failure to transfer title was an administrative oversight rather than an intentional exclusion from the trust.
Consider a Heggstad petition when a trustmaker has created a valid trust but some assets remain in the trustmaker’s name and no other straightforward transfer mechanism exists. This can occur with real property that was not deeded into the trust, bank accounts that were never retitled, or retirement accounts where beneficiary designations were intended to align with the trust plan. A petition can confirm the asset’s inclusion in the trust and give trustees legal authority to manage or distribute that asset according to the trust’s provisions, offering a path to orderly administration.
Also consider a petition when hesitation from financial institutions or title companies prevents a trustee from accessing or moving an asset, or when family members disagree about an asset’s ownership. The court’s declaration can overcome institutional reluctance and settle disputes by formalizing the trustmaker’s intent. Filing a petition may require time and legal advocacy, but it can result in a definitive resolution that avoids a broader probate process and reduces future litigation risk for trustees and beneficiaries.
Typical circumstances include real property left in the trustmaker’s name at death, bank accounts not retitled after the trust was created, or assets with outdated beneficiary records. Sometimes a trustmaker signed a trust but did not complete funding due to illness, oversight, or complexity of title transfers. Other times, beneficiaries or financial institutions contest whether a particular asset belongs to the trust. In all these situations, a Heggstad petition offers a means to have the court evaluate the trustmaker’s intent and declare the asset as part of the trust estate for administration.
When a deed was not properly executed to transfer real property into the trust, the trustee may lack authority to manage or sell the property. A Heggstad petition can ask the court to declare the property as trust property when evidence shows the trustmaker intended to include the real estate in the trust. The court considers documents, statements, and any steps taken toward transfer to determine whether the requirement for trust inclusion is met. This process helps resolve title issues and allow the trustee to proceed under the trust terms.
Bank and brokerage accounts are often overlooked when a trust is created, leaving accounts in the trustmaker’s name and preventing the trustee from accessing funds when needed. Financial institutions may require a court order before releasing funds to a trustee, and a Heggstad petition can provide that order based on the trustmaker’s intent. Petition documents typically include account statements, trust copies, and declarations that explain the oversight and show the trustmaker’s plan for those assets to be controlled by the trust.
Conflicts arise when beneficiary designations or account titling do not match the trustmaker’s broader estate plan, creating ambiguity about the intended owner of an asset. A Heggstad petition helps resolve discrepancies by presenting evidence that supports treating the asset as part of the trust. When beneficiaries disagree, the court can examine the totality of evidence to determine the trustmaker’s intent. Resolving such conflicts through a petition helps ensure assets are administered consistently with the trustmaker’s overall plan rather than under inconsistent beneficiary instruments.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide guidance to clients in Seeley who need assistance with Heggstad petitions and trust funding issues. We assist with document collection, drafting petitions and declarations, coordinating service of process, and presenting the matter to the probate court when necessary. Our goal is to provide clear next steps, realistic timelines, and practical solutions that help trustees obtain the authority needed to administer assets under the trust. We also advise on alternatives and work to minimize delay and expense for families.
The firm offers focused guidance on trust administration matters for clients throughout California, including Heggstad petitions. We emphasize careful case preparation, complete document collection, and persuasive presentation to the court so trustees can obtain clear authority to manage mis-titled assets. Our approach balances legal advocacy with practical steps that help institutions accept trustee authority more readily, which can shorten timelines and reduce friction during estate settlement.
We work closely with clients to identify and preserve key evidence, draft clear declarations, and communicate with financial institutions to effect title corrections when possible. Where court action is necessary, we prepare petitions that explain the trustmaker’s intent with organized factual support. We also advise on strategies to minimize the scope of court involvement while protecting beneficiaries’ interests, helping families reach efficient and durable resolutions when trust funding problems arise.
Clients in Seeley and neighboring areas receive individualized attention, responsive communication, and practical updates on case status. We explain the options, likely timelines, and potential outcomes so families can make informed choices about whether to pursue a Heggstad petition, informal correction, or other estate administration steps. Our goal is to help trustees move forward with confidence and to secure court orders when needed to ensure the trustmaker’s plan is respected and followed.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust, title documents, and account records to identify issues and assemble supporting evidence. We then advise on whether an informal correction is feasible or whether a Heggstad petition is the prudent path. If a petition is needed, we prepare the petition and supporting declarations, serve required parties, and handle court filings and hearings. Throughout the process we communicate with trustees and beneficiaries to keep them informed and coordinate with institutions to facilitate practical transfer once the court provides an order.
The first step involves collecting all relevant documents, including the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence or notes that show the trustmaker’s intent. We review the materials to assess the strength of a Heggstad petition and identify any additional evidence needed. This assessment includes evaluating potential interested parties, determining service requirements, and estimating timelines and likely costs so clients can make informed decisions about whether to proceed with court action.
Collecting trust documents and asset records is essential, because the petition depends on a clear record demonstrating intent and ownership. We help clients obtain account statements, deeds, beneficiary designations, and any prior transfer paperwork. When records are incomplete, we pursue institutional records or declarations from witnesses who can corroborate the trustmaker’s intentions. Thorough documentation reduces the risk of surprises and helps craft a compelling narrative for the court that supports treating the asset as trust property.
We identify all persons and entities who may need to be served with notice of the petition and evaluate potential objections they might raise. This includes beneficiaries, heirs, creditors, and financial institutions. Anticipating possible disputes allows us to prepare responsive evidence and, when appropriate, seek resolution through negotiation before filing. Understanding the landscape of interested parties helps shape a strategic approach that balances efficiency with thoroughness to protect trustees and beneficiaries during the petition process.
After collecting evidence and evaluating interested parties, we prepare the petition that requests the court to declare the asset part of the trust. The petition includes factual declarations, copies of the trust and relevant documents, and a legal memorandum explaining why the court should grant the requested relief. We file the petition with the appropriate probate court, arrange for required service on interested parties, and monitor any responses to ensure timely handling and compliance with court procedures.
Drafting clear declarations is a critical element of the petition, as witness statements and documentary evidence provide the factual basis for the court’s findings. Declarations often describe the trustmaker’s intent, the history of the asset, and any attempts to retitle. We organize exhibits and provide a concise presentation that assists the judge in understanding the circumstances. Strong factual narratives and complete documentation improve the likelihood of a favorable ruling and can reduce the need for lengthy court hearings.
Once the petition package is complete, we file it in the proper probate court and ensure that all required parties are served according to procedure. Proper service preserves the court’s jurisdiction and protects the petitioner’s position if objections arise. We track response deadlines and prepare replies if necessary. Coordinating service and filing accurately helps prevent delays and ensures the case proceeds on schedule toward resolution, whether by court order, negotiated agreement, or hearing.
If the court requires a hearing, we present the factual record and legal argument to the judge, responding to any objections and clarifying the trustmaker’s intent. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order declaring the asset part of the trust and directing appropriate title corrections or transfers. We then provide the court order and supporting documents to financial institutions, title companies, or other third parties to effect the required changes and facilitate normal trust administration according to the trust’s terms.
At any required hearing, we present the organized record and address questions from the court or objections from interested parties. The presentation focuses on evidence of the trustmaker’s intent and factual explanations for why title was not previously corrected. Clear, well-documented testimony and exhibits help the judge evaluate the petition efficiently. We prepare clients and witnesses for testimony and ensure the record supports a focused judicial determination that enables the trustee to proceed with administration.
After the court issues an order, our work shifts to implementing the order and updating necessary records with third parties. This may include providing certified copies of the court order to banks, recording deeds to reflect trust ownership, or submitting orders to plan administrators. Effective follow-through ensures the trustee can exercise authority without further delay and that the asset is handled according to the trust terms. Proper record updates reduce the chance of future disputes and help complete trust administration smoothly.
A Heggstad petition is a specific probate court filing in California that asks the court to declare that a particular asset should be treated as part of a trust even though the title was not formally changed. The petition typically arises when a trustmaker created a trust but failed to transfer certain assets into it, and the trustee needs legal authority to manage or distribute those assets under the trust’s terms. The petition presents evidence of the trustmaker’s intent and documents the reasons the asset was not retitled, so the court can make a declaratory finding. The remedy is focused on a targeted asset and is often pursued to avoid a broader probate administration. The court reviews the trust instrument, account records, deeds, and declarations from people with knowledge of the trustmaker’s plan. If the court finds sufficient evidence of intent, it can enter an order recognizing the asset as trust property and directing the appropriate title corrections or transfers, allowing the trustee to proceed with administration under the trust.
A Heggstad petition differs from probate in that it is a focused request to treat a specific asset as part of a trust, while probate is a full court-supervised administration of a decedent’s estate when assets are not held in trust. Probate typically involves broader creditor notice, asset inventory, and formal distribution under the will or intestacy laws. A successful Heggstad petition can reduce the need for full probate by confirming that particular property belongs to the trust and therefore can be managed under the trust’s procedures. Probate may still be necessary when multiple assets lack trust funding or when creditor claims and other administrative issues require estate administration. Choosing between a targeted petition and probate depends on the asset types, the completeness of documentary evidence, and whether interested parties can reach resolution without a full probate process.
The court considers a range of evidence when evaluating a Heggstad petition, focusing on proof of the trustmaker’s intent to have the asset included in the trust. Common evidence includes the trust agreement, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations consistent with the trust, correspondence or notes indicating intent, and declarations from witnesses or family members. Documents showing attempts to retitle the asset or institutional communications can also be important in explaining the omission and demonstrating steps taken to fund the trust. The persuasiveness of evidence depends on its clarity and connection to the trustmaker’s plan. A well-organized petition presents a coherent factual narrative supported by documents, which helps the court determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. In contested matters, the court will weigh conflicting testimony and records to reach a conclusion based on the totality of the evidence.
A Heggstad petition may be resolved without a contested hearing if the petition is undisputed and the court finds the submitted evidence sufficient on its papers. In some uncontested cases, the court may grant relief based on the filed documents and declarations without an in-person hearing. Achieving this outcome often depends on whether interested parties waive a hearing or fail to object within required deadlines, and whether the petition package addresses potential concerns thoroughly for judicial review. However, when interested parties object or the factual record is incomplete, a hearing may be required so the court can receive testimony and resolve disputes. Preparing a petition with robust written evidence and addressing foreseeable objections increases the chances of a streamlined resolution without a contested hearing, though no outcome can be guaranteed in advance.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the completeness of documentation, whether interested parties object, and court scheduling. In uncontested matters with clear evidence, the process can be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, depending on court availability and service requirements. When objections arise or additional factual development is needed, the timeline can extend to several months or longer, particularly if discovery or contested hearings are required. Proactive document collection, timely service, and addressing potential issues before filing can shorten the process. Courts in different counties may have varying calendars and procedures, so understanding local practices and preparing a thorough petition are important steps toward achieving a timely resolution for trustees and beneficiaries.
When a Heggstad petition is filed, state rules require that certain interested parties receive notice of the petition, which may include beneficiaries of the trust, heirs, potential creditors, and other persons with a legal interest in the asset. Proper service ensures the court’s jurisdiction and allows parties the opportunity to respond or object. Identifying the correct list of interested parties and serving them according to procedural rules is a critical step in the filing process to avoid procedural defects that could delay or jeopardize relief. The specific service requirements can vary based on the asset type and the parties involved, so it is important to accurately compile the list of persons entitled to notice. Failing to notify required parties can result in the court setting aside an order or requiring additional proceedings, which can increase cost and delay for trustees seeking authority to administer the property.
A court order obtained through a Heggstad petition is generally persuasive to banks, title companies, and plan administrators because it is an official judicial declaration regarding ownership or trust inclusion. Once the court declares the asset part of the trust and issues an order, third parties typically accept the order as authority to retitle accounts, release funds, or recognize the trustee’s authority, though they may request certified copies and additional forms required by their internal procedures. Even with a court order, third parties may have administrative requirements to complete transfers, such as updated account paperwork or recorded deeds. Providing the necessary certified documents and working directly with institutions often resolves remaining administrative hurdles so the trustee can proceed with trust administration without further court action.
If a beneficiary objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objection and evaluate the competing evidence before ruling. Objections often focus on whether the trustmaker truly intended the asset to be included in the trust or whether a technical error or other factor affects ownership. The judge will weigh declarations, documents, and any testimony presented by the parties to determine which position aligns with the trustmaker’s intent and applicable law. When objections are raised, parties may be able to resolve disputes through negotiation or agreement that avoids a contested hearing. If resolution is not possible, the court will hold a hearing to assess the evidence. Preparing a thorough petition and anticipating likely objections strengthens the petition and helps address contested issues efficiently during the court process.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include pursuing informal corrections with the cooperation of beneficiaries and financial institutions, or, if multiple assets are affected, opening a probate administration to obtain broad court authority to transfer property. Informal corrections may involve obtaining sign-offs from interested parties, submitting updated account documents, or providing trust certifications to institutions that will accept them. These approaches can be faster and less costly if all parties agree and if the institution accepts the documentation. When informal measures are not possible due to disagreement or institutional refusal, a Heggstad petition offers a focused legal remedy. In some circumstances, mediation or dispute resolution between interested parties can achieve a solution without court filings, but when certainty and enforceable authority are required, a petition provides a reliable formal pathway to resolve title questions.
To begin the process for a Heggstad petition in Seeley, start by gathering the trust document, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence or notes that show the trustmaker’s intent. Identify potential interested parties and keep records of any steps already taken to retitle assets. Organizing this material and presenting it in a clear manner helps determine whether a petition is likely to succeed and which additional records may be needed. Contacting a qualified estate planning practice to review the documents and advise on next steps can help clarify options and timelines. A legal review will assess whether an informal correction might work or if filing a petition is the appropriate course, prepare the petition package, and handle court filing and service requirements so trustees can move forward with administration.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas