A HIPAA authorization is an essential estate planning document that allows a designated person to access protected health information on behalf of another individual. In Westmorland, at the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, our approach focuses on clear, practical documents that fit within a larger estate plan. A properly drafted HIPAA authorization complements a living trust, advance health care directive, and power of attorney by enabling timely access to medical records. This opening discussion explains why this authorization matters, how it interfaces with other planning tools, and what typical clients in Imperial County should expect when preparing these records and delegations.
Every family and health situation is different, and a HIPAA authorization should reflect the specific needs and relationships of the individual creating it. In many cases, medical providers require an explicit written release before disclosing records or discussing care with family members. When paired with a health care directive and a durable power of attorney for finances, a HIPAA authorization closes informational gaps that can slow decision making during urgent medical events. This paragraph introduces how we approach tailoring authorizations to cover medical records access, communication with healthcare teams, and the preservation of patient privacy while ensuring practical access when it is needed most.
A HIPAA authorization provides authorized individuals with the legal ability to receive protected health information and engage with medical providers when the patient may be unable to do so. This helps families and designated agents obtain timely updates on diagnosis, treatment plans, and test results, which can be essential during hospital stays, diagnosis of serious illness, or coordination of long-term care. By granting specified access through a clear written instrument, the authorization reduces confusion at critical moments and helps avoid delays that can interfere with medical decision making, appointment coordination, and the administration of ongoing care obligations.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serve families throughout Imperial County with a focus on thoughtful estate planning documents, including HIPAA authorizations that align with broader wills and trust arrangements. We emphasize clear communication with clients so that their wishes are documented in a way healthcare providers and institutions will recognize and accept. Our approach includes careful review of existing estate plans, coordination with advance health care directives and powers of attorney, and ensuring that client decisions are carried out smoothly. Local knowledge of Westmorland and California health care practices informs how we prepare and deliver documents for practical use.
A HIPAA authorization is a written release that specifically permits health care providers to disclose protected health information to named recipients. Unlike general estate planning documents, this authorization targets medical records and communications governed by federal privacy rules. Understanding the scope and limits of such an authorization helps individuals decide what information should be shared, for how long, and with whom. Clear language can specify whether disclosures cover past, present, or future medical records and whether the authorization survives incapacitation, which is particularly important when coordinating with advance directives and durable powers of attorney.
HIPAA authorizations must meet specific content requirements to be valid and usable by hospitals and clinics, including named recipients, a description of the protected information, and an expiration or revocation process. Implementing an authorization as part of a comprehensive estate plan helps ensure that access aligns with the client’s overall medical and financial directions. In practice, we recommend clients think through scenarios that might require access to medical histories, imaging, or test results and tailor language so that the appointed person can act effectively in those situations while maintaining appropriate privacy controls.
A HIPAA authorization is a specific consent form allowing defined individuals to obtain protected health information from medical providers. It differs from an advance health care directive, which addresses treatment choices, because it focuses solely on permission to receive medical records and related communications. The authorization can be broad or narrow, allowing access to all health records or only certain types or time frames. Knowing how to craft the authorization determines whether the representative can access lab results, imaging reports, or billing information, and whether access continues if the principal becomes incapacitated or revoked the permission.
Drafting a HIPAA authorization typically involves identifying the patient, naming one or more authorized recipients, describing the types of records to be released, and specifying the duration of the authorization. It also identifies the entity that may disclose records, includes a signature and date, and provides instructions on revocation. The process often begins with a consultation to determine appropriate scope, followed by drafting and client review. We also advise keeping copies with other estate planning documents, providing copies to primary care providers and hospitals, and updating the authorization when circumstances or relationships change.
This short glossary clarifies common terms used when preparing HIPAA authorizations and related estate planning documents. Familiarity with these terms helps individuals make informed choices about who can access medical information and how long that access lasts. Terms include definitions for protected health information, designated recipient, revocation, durable powers, and advance health care directives. Clear definitions reduce misunderstandings with medical providers and ensure that the authorization functions as intended during medical appointments, hospitalizations, or care coordination across different health systems. Knowing these terms supports better coordination between legal and medical teams.
Protected Health Information, often abbreviated PHI, refers to medical and health-related information that can be tied to an individual, including medical histories, test results, diagnoses, treatment records, and certain billing information. Under federal rules, disclosure of PHI generally requires either patient consent through a valid authorization or another lawful basis for sharing. A HIPAA authorization explicitly permits specific disclosures of PHI to named persons or entities. Understanding the scope of PHI helps decision makers determine what kinds of information they want to allow access to and to draft authorizations that appropriately protect privacy while enabling necessary communication.
A designated recipient is the person or organization named in a HIPAA authorization who is allowed to receive protected health information. This can be a family member, trusted friend, attorney, or care coordinator. The authorization should clearly identify the recipient to avoid confusion and ensure that health care providers release information only to those who have been expressly authorized. Choosing the right recipient involves balancing availability, trust, and the recipient’s ability to act on the patient’s behalf in medical settings, including communicating with providers and understanding clinical terminology or care instructions.
Revocation refers to the process by which the person who signed the HIPAA authorization withdraws permission for further disclosures of protected health information. Durable duration choices determine whether the authorization remains in force if the signer becomes incapacitated. Good practice is to describe how and when revocation is effective, such as requiring written notice, and to state a clear expiration date or event. Including instructions on revocation protects the signer’s ability to change who has access, while clear duration language helps providers and authorized recipients know when access is no longer permitted.
An advance health care directive expresses a patient’s wishes about medical care and often appoints a decision maker for treatment choices, while a HIPAA authorization focuses exclusively on permission to disclose medical information. Both documents work together: the directive guides treatment, and the authorization permits the designated decision maker to receive the medical information necessary to carry out those wishes. Drafting both documents in harmony ensures that the person making treatment decisions also has the information needed to make informed choices on the patient’s behalf and speak effectively to health care personnel.
When considering how to grant access to health information, individuals can choose narrow authorizations limited to certain records or broad releases covering a wide range of data and ongoing access. Narrow releases may be appropriate for short-term needs, such as a single procedure or appointment, while broader authorizations are useful for ongoing care coordination, chronic illness management, or long-term caregiving relationships. Another option is to rely on statutory powers under a durable health care directive, but without a separate HIPAA authorization, providers may still withhold medical records. An informed comparison should consider practical use, privacy, and long-term implications.
A limited HIPAA authorization is often adequate for short-term medical needs such as a single surgery, specific diagnostic testing, or a brief hospital stay. In these situations, authorizing one person to access particular records or communicate with providers during the defined event can simplify logistics without granting ongoing access to all health information. This approach helps maintain privacy while achieving practical goals, and it is well-suited for individuals who want to restrict disclosure to a discrete set of circumstances or a limited time period following a particular treatment or appointment.
Temporary authorizations can help caregivers coordinate recovery services, arrange follow-up appointments, and obtain discharge instructions after a hospitalization. When family members or friends only need access for a defined recovery period, a limited release avoids broader exposure of medical history. This model is useful when the patient will resume full control of medical communications soon after recovery. Clear start and end dates ensure that medical records are shared only during the necessary interval, safeguarding privacy once the temporary care period concludes and the patient regains independence.
When an individual faces chronic illness, long-term care needs, or complex medical management, a comprehensive HIPAA authorization ensures that designated caregivers and decision makers have continuous access to necessary records. This access supports care coordination across multiple providers and helps avoid delays or gaps in treatment. In these cases, integrating a broad authorization with an advance health care directive and power of attorney creates a cohesive plan that allows prompt sharing of information and consistent decision making in the patient’s best interest while maintaining appropriate privacy and oversight.
Individuals who receive care from several specialists, hospitals, or outpatient facilities benefit from a comprehensive authorization that allows seamless communication between providers and designated family members. Frequent transfers of records between institutions can be hindered without clear written permission. A durable, broad authorization reduces administrative friction and helps keep all providers informed about diagnoses, medications, and treatment plans. This continuity prevents miscommunication and supports coordinated care across different clinical settings, reducing the risk of conflicting treatment instructions or overlooked medical history.
A comprehensive authorization reduces delays in obtaining medical records and facilitates consistent follow-through on treatment plans, especially during transitions of care such as hospital discharge or transfer to a rehabilitation facility. It enables those closest to the patient to maintain informed involvement without repeatedly seeking permission for each provider. This streamlining often improves the speed of care coordination and supports accurate medication reconciliation, relevant history sharing, and continuity between primary care and specialist services, which can reduce avoidable complications and provide peace of mind for families.
Beyond operational benefits, a broad authorization helps ensure that appointed decision makers have the information they need to represent the patient’s wishes consistently. When paired with an advance health care directive and a power of attorney, the authorization closes gaps that might otherwise leave providers uncertain about who may be consulted. Having integrated documents reduces administrative burdens at hospitals and clinics, and it helps avoid missing or delayed communication when timing is important for treatments, referrals, or insurance matters associated with medical care.
One key benefit of a comprehensive authorization is the speed and clarity it brings to communications with physicians, hospitals, and care teams. Authorized individuals can obtain test results, coordinate follow-up care, and discuss treatment options directly with providers, which helps make timely decisions and avoid misunderstandings. This clear channel of communication is particularly valuable during hospitalizations or care transitions, when rapid access to records and provider input can influence treatment planning and ensure that the patient’s preferences are respected.
Another advantage of a broad authorization is that it removes repetitive administrative hurdles that often slow down care coordination. Instead of seeking new permissions for each provider or appointment, authorized parties can move forward with necessary tasks using a single valid authorization. This reduces repeated paperwork, minimizes miscommunications, and helps ensure that critical information about medications, allergies, and past treatments is available to clinicians when they need it most. The result is smoother transitions and better continuity of care across settings.
When drafting a HIPAA authorization, be precise about who may receive medical information. Use full legal names and consider including relationships or contact details to avoid confusion with similarly named individuals. Specify whether alternate contacts may act if the primary designee is unavailable. Clear naming reduces the risk that healthcare providers will refuse disclosure due to ambiguity. It also prevents unintended recipients from gaining access. Updating the authorization when relationships or contact information change helps maintain its practical utility and ensures the right people can communicate with providers when needed.
Once an authorization is signed, provide copies to your primary care physician, key specialists, and any institutions where you receive care, such as hospitals or clinics. Keep a master copy with your estate planning documents and update it as relationships, providers, or circumstances change. Let the designated recipient know where to find a copy and how to present it to health care providers. Retaining organized copies and informing relevant parties reduces confusion during medical emergencies and ensures that authorized individuals can access records when prompt action is needed.
People add HIPAA authorizations to their estate plans for a variety of practical reasons, including hospital admissions, chronic condition management, coordination during recovery from surgery, and to enable trusted family members to follow the course of complex treatments. Having written authorization prevents avoidable delays caused by privacy protections that bar providers from sharing information without explicit consent. It also helps those responsible for caregiving obtain relevant histories, medication lists, and test results needed to coordinate care effectively across multiple providers and facilities.
Another important reason to include a HIPAA authorization is to ensure that the person making health care choices under an advance directive or power of attorney also has access to the necessary medical information. In some cases, the person designated to make treatment decisions cannot obtain records without a separate authorization. Drafting these documents together as part of a coordinated plan avoids that gap, provides continuity of information and decision making, and helps families navigate difficult healthcare choices with better context and clarity.
Common circumstances include hospitalizations, surgeries, sudden incapacitating events, long-term care placement, and ongoing therapy or specialist management that requires coordination among providers. Other scenarios include handling medical billing disputes, obtaining records for disability claims, and preparing for travel when a trusted individual may need to manage care. In each of these situations, having a valid HIPAA authorization reduces friction in communication channels and ensures that those supporting the patient can obtain vital records and provider input to assist with care and decision making.
During a hospital stay or emergency, time-sensitive decisions and rapid information sharing are often necessary. A HIPAA authorization ensures that family members or designated representatives can receive updates and test results and can communicate directly with the care team. This access helps coordinate care plans, understand options, and obtain discharge instructions without delay. Having the authorization available at the time of admission prevents administrative obstacles that could otherwise impede clear communication between the hospital and the persons responsible for post-discharge arrangements or ongoing decision making.
For individuals with long-term care needs, ongoing specialist consultations, or chronic conditions, a HIPAA authorization keeps caregivers and family members informed about treatment adjustments, medication changes, and evolving care recommendations. This permission helps maintain continuity between multiple providers and facilities, reduces the need for repetitive paperwork, and enables smoother transitions between home care, outpatient services, and residential care facilities. It provides a reliable means for the designated person to compile and share relevant medical information as care needs change over time.
When pursuing insurance claims, disability benefits, or addressing billing disputes, obtaining medical records quickly is often necessary to support claims and documentation. A HIPAA authorization permits authorized persons to request and receive the medical documentation needed for claims processing and dispute resolution. Having a valid authorization in place reduces delays in assembling required records, facilitates communication with insurers and billing departments, and helps the patient or their designee gather evidence to support applications or appeals related to care and coverage.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides local estate planning services in Westmorland, including preparation of HIPAA authorizations that integrate with your overall planning documents. We work with clients to identify appropriate designees, scope of access, and duration, and we coordinate the authorization with trusts, wills, powers of attorney, and advance health care directives when needed. Local familiarity with area hospitals, clinics, and provider practices helps ensure that documents are practical and accepted by institutions across Imperial County, reducing friction when records must be accessed quickly for care coordination.
We approach HIPAA authorizations with attention to clarity and practical usability, ensuring documents contain the necessary elements providers expect to see. Creating an authorization that is both legally sound and usable in clinical settings requires careful drafting, consistent terminology, and coordination with other estate planning instruments. Our process includes client interviews to understand relationships and likely scenarios, drafting tailored language, and advising on distribution so the authorization is available when needed. This reduces administrative obstacles and helps ensure the patient’s information flows to the right people at the right time.
Preparing a HIPAA authorization alongside a health care directive and a durable power of attorney ensures that decision makers have both permission and information to act. We assist in integrating these documents so that they reflect the client’s values and practical needs for medical communications. We also provide guidance on revocation procedures and record-keeping practices so clients understand how to update or withdraw permissions if relationships or circumstances change. Clear integration prevents gaps that can delay access to records when timely information is essential for care coordination.
Clients receive practical guidance on where to keep signed authorizations and how to share copies with primary care providers and hospitals. We discuss contingencies like alternate designees, expiration triggers, and how to present authorizations to providers in emergencies. Our goal is to produce documents that medical staff will accept without unnecessary pushback and to educate clients and their families on how to use the authorization in real-world settings. This practical focus helps families maintain continuity of care and reduces uncertainty during stressful medical situations.
Our legal process begins with a thorough discussion of your medical communication needs, relationships, and existing estate planning documents. We review prior wills, trusts, advance health care directives, and powers of attorney to identify any gaps where a HIPAA authorization is needed. After clarifying the scope and recipients, we draft the authorization using language accepted by healthcare institutions, review it with you to confirm details, and provide final copies for distribution. We also advise on storing and sharing the authorization so it is accessible when medical decisions arise.
The initial review focuses on understanding your current estate plan, health care preferences, and who should have access to medical information. We ask about primary care physicians, regular specialists, and institutions where you receive care, as well as who will likely need access in an emergency. This step ensures that the authorization will be drafted to meet practical needs and accepted by local providers. It also identifies whether any other documents should be updated concurrently to prevent conflicts and to align decision making and information access.
We examine any existing health care directives, powers of attorney, or authorizations to evaluate scope and potential gaps. This includes noting whether named decision makers can access records under current paperwork and identifying where additional permissions are necessary. We also collect information about healthcare providers and institutions so the final authorization lists the appropriate entities and avoids ambiguity. Understanding provider relationships helps shape the language to be effective with the hospitals and clinics you use most frequently in Imperial County.
An important part of the first step is clarifying how much access the client wants to grant and under what circumstances. We discuss whether the authorization should be event-based, time-limited, or ongoing, and whether it should cover all records or only certain categories. This conversation balances the desire for privacy with practical needs for communication and ensures that the final document reflects the client’s values while remaining functional for health care providers. It also helps identify alternates and instructions for revocation or amendment.
Once the goals and scope are clear, we draft the HIPAA authorization to conform with federal requirements and local provider practices. The draft includes recipient names, descriptions of the records covered, the duration, and revocation instructions. We present the draft to the client and discuss any revisions to ensure clarity and acceptability. This collaborative review minimizes the risk of providers refusing disclosure due to ambiguous language and helps the client understand how the authorization will operate in different medical situations.
In drafting, we choose language that hospitals and clinics commonly accept so the authorization will be recognized and acted upon quickly. This includes precisely naming individuals, describing the information to be released, and specifying effective dates and revocation methods. We avoid vague phrases that could cause confusion and make sure the document is formatted for easy use with medical records departments. Clear, provider-friendly wording helps reduce back-and-forth and ensures that authorized persons can obtain necessary records without delay.
During the review session, we walk through each clause so the client understands the implications of granting access. We address questions about limits, duration, and how to revoke the authorization. If the client requests changes, we update the draft to reflect their preferences while maintaining legal and practical effectiveness. The final document is then prepared for signature and distribution, and we advise on how many copies to make and where to file them so that authorized individuals and primary providers have easy access when needed.
After signing, the authorization should be distributed to primary care providers, relevant specialists, hospitals, and any care facilities the client uses. We recommend keeping a master copy with other estate planning documents and providing an accessible copy to the designated recipients. We also advise clients on how to record or deliver revocation notices if they later change their minds. Thoughtful distribution and record keeping ensure the authorization is available during an emergency and prevents delays in obtaining medical records for care coordination and decision making.
Execution typically requires the client’s signature and date, and in some cases providers may request notarization or witness signatures for added validation. We explain local provider preferences and, when recommended, assist in arranging notarization to avoid later disputes. Ensuring the signature block is complete and consistent with other documents enhances acceptance by hospitals and clinics. Clients receive guidance on where to file the original and how many certified copies to distribute to designated individuals and healthcare institutions for practical use.
Life changes such as relocations, altered relationships, new providers, or evolving health needs make it important to review the HIPAA authorization periodically. We advise clients to revisit authorizations when major life events occur to update designees, adjust scope, or modify duration and revocation methods. Keeping the authorization current and reviewing it with other estate planning documents ensures continued alignment between information access and the client’s overall care and estate planning goals, preventing unexpected barriers to records when they are most needed.
A HIPAA authorization is a written consent that allows health care providers to disclose the patient’s protected health information to named individuals or entities. It is necessary when the patient wants others, such as family members or care coordinators, to receive medical records, test results, or to speak with providers on their behalf. Without this document, privacy rules often prevent providers from sharing details, which can delay decision making and care coordination. The authorization clarifies who may access information and under what circumstances, reducing confusion during important medical events. Including a HIPAA authorization is particularly helpful if you anticipate hospitalizations, long-term care needs, or if multiple providers need to coordinate care. It complements other planning documents by ensuring that those responsible for making health decisions can obtain the necessary medical information. When the authorization is drafted with clear recipient names, scope descriptions, and duration details, it becomes a practical tool for families and caregivers to manage medical communications efficiently.
An advance health care directive states the patient’s preferences for medical treatment and often appoints a decision maker to carry out those preferences, while a HIPAA authorization specifically grants permission to access medical records and provider communications. The directive guides choices about treatment, whereas the authorization allows a designated person to receive the information needed to apply those choices. Both documents work together: the directive tells providers what the patient wants, and the authorization provides the person making decisions with the factual medical background required to implement those decisions effectively. Having both documents signed and coordinated prevents a situation where a decision maker lacks the medical information needed to act. Providers may refuse to release records without a separate authorization even if a directive appoints a decision maker. Ensuring the two documents are aligned avoids administrative hurdles and helps families carry out treatment decisions with complete information.
A designated recipient should be someone the patient trusts to receive and responsibly manage sensitive medical information, such as a spouse, adult child, close friend, or an appointed care manager. Consider practical factors like availability, geographical proximity, and ability to communicate with medical professionals. It may be helpful to appoint alternates in case the primary designee is unavailable. Being explicit about full names and contact details reduces ambiguity and ensures medical providers release records to the intended person without confusion. When choosing a recipient, think about their willingness to engage in healthcare conversations, manage documentation, and coordinate with other family members if needed. If privacy is a concern, you can limit the authorization to specific types of records or time frames to reduce unnecessary disclosure while still enabling necessary communication for treatment or care coordination.
Yes, an authorization can be tailored to limit access to specific categories of records, such as records pertaining to a particular condition, time period, or type of treatment. Narrow authorizations are useful when the patient wants to share information for a particular matter, such as a single surgery or an insurance claim, without granting ongoing access to their entire medical history. Clear descriptions of the permitted records help providers comply with the patient’s wishes while protecting unrelated or sensitive information. Tailoring the scope requires careful drafting so providers understand exactly what is authorized. Ambiguous language can result in delays or refusal to release records. We help clients choose appropriate limiting language and ensure the document meets the practical needs of both patients and medical providers, balancing privacy with effective access where needed.
Revoking a HIPAA authorization generally requires notifying the provider or providers in writing according to the method specified in the authorization. The document should state how to revoke permission so that medical providers can stop further disclosures when they receive proper notice. Keep in mind that revocation does not undo disclosures that occurred before the provider received notice, so prompt action and clear communication are important when changing consent. To ensure revocation is effective, provide written notice to the institutions and practitioners that have copies of the authorization and keep a record of when and how the revocation was delivered. We advise clients on best practices for revocation and assist in creating clear instructions to prevent unintended continued sharing of medical information.
Yes, authorizations prepared with attention to common provider requirements are more likely to be accepted by hospitals and clinics. Medical institutions often look for specific elements such as the patient’s name, a clear statement of consent, named recipients, types of records to be disclosed, and signature details. Drafting authorizations in a style that aligns with provider expectations reduces the likelihood of disputes and speeds up record retrieval. We prepare documents to be practical in local clinical settings across Imperial County and advise on any notarization or witness preferences that institutions may request. Nevertheless, provider policies can vary, and some institutions might request additional forms or verification. We help clients anticipate those needs by suggesting distribution of copies to primary providers and by offering guidance on responding to provider requests for confirmation, ensuring the authorization can function smoothly when it is needed most.
Including a HIPAA authorization with your broader estate planning package is often wise because it ensures all healthcare permissions and directives are coordinated. When the authorization is prepared alongside trusts, wills, and powers of attorney, it is easier to ensure the same persons are designated for related functions and to avoid conflicts among documents. This coordination helps ensure that the individual who is empowered to make health decisions also has access to the records needed to act effectively on those decisions. We recommend reviewing all estate planning documents together at regular intervals so that changes in one document are reflected in others. Including the authorization in the estate plan also makes it more likely that family members and providers will be aware of its existence and location, improving the chances it will be available when medical situations arise.
If you become incapacitated without a HIPAA authorization, designated decision makers may find it difficult to obtain medical records due to privacy protections that restrict disclosure. Even if a power of attorney or directive appoints a decision maker for treatment choices, providers may require a separate HIPAA authorization to release records. This gap can delay access to crucial information needed to make informed decisions and coordinate care, creating stress for families and potentially affecting the quality and speed of medical responses. To prevent such issues, having a HIPAA authorization in place before incapacity occurs ensures that trusted individuals can obtain the records they need promptly. Preparing the authorization in advance provides a practical mechanism for ongoing communication with medical teams and helps avoid administrative barriers at times when quick access to information is most important.
It is advisable to review a HIPAA authorization whenever major life events occur, such as changes in relationships, new healthcare providers, a move to a different region, or changes in health status. Annual review is also a reasonable practice to confirm that designees, contact information, and the scope of access remain appropriate. Periodic review ensures the authorization continues to align with the client’s wishes and practical needs and allows timely updates to prevent outdated or conflicting documents. Regular review also gives an opportunity to coordinate the authorization with other updated estate planning documents and to confirm that medical providers have current copies. When changes are made, distributed copies should be updated so that authorized persons and healthcare institutions have the latest version.
A HIPAA authorization can be very helpful when pursuing insurance claims or resolving billing disputes because it allows authorized individuals to obtain the medical records and supporting documentation insurers often require. Having ready access to relevant records speeds up claim submissions, supports appeals, and helps clarify billing questions. Without an authorization, families may face delays in assembling necessary documents for insurers or third parties reviewing claims or coverage decisions. When addressing claims or disputes, it is useful to specify in the authorization that billing and insurance information can be disclosed. Careful drafting ensures that the person handling claims has the records needed to communicate with insurers, submit evidence, and follow up on disputes efficiently, improving the likelihood of timely resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas