A Heggstad petition can be an essential legal tool when a decedent intended assets to be held in trust but certain items were never retitled. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist Lone Pine and Inyo County families in resolving these gaps so assets are treated according to the trust maker’s intent. A Heggstad proceeding asks the court to recognize that specific property was always intended to be part of a trust, permitting transfer without traditional probate. This page explains how a Heggstad petition works, what evidence is typically needed, and how the firm supports clients from initial review through court orders and title changes.
When property remains in a decedent’s name after their passing, beneficiaries and trustees may face uncertainty about whether those assets belong to the trust. A Heggstad petition helps close that gap by presenting evidence that the transfer was intended but not completed. The process reduces delays and clarifies ownership so assets can be administered under the trust’s terms. Our approach emphasizes careful document review and clear court filings tailored to the facts of each matter. If you are managing a trust administration in Lone Pine and encounter untitled property, a prompt review can preserve value and reduce dispute risk.
A Heggstad petition provides a pathway to align property ownership with the trust maker’s intent, avoiding unnecessary probate administration for assets that should have transferred into a trust. By securing a court determination of trust ownership, trustees can move forward with asset management, distribution, or sale with clearer title and fewer obstacles. The petition can also limit contested claims by documenting intent and supplying sworn testimony or contemporaneous documents. For beneficiaries, this means a more efficient administration and less friction. Handling these matters carefully at the outset helps preserve estate value and reduces the likelihood of protracted litigation in the long term.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in San Jose provides representation to families across California, including Lone Pine and Inyo County, on trust and estate matters such as Heggstad petitions. The firm focuses on clear communication, thorough document analysis, and strategic court filings aimed at confirming trust ownership and restoring clear title. We combine practical litigation readiness with careful negotiation to resolve disputes where possible, while preparing persuasive declarations and exhibits when court resolution is needed. Clients can reach the office at 408-528-2827 to request an initial review and to discuss next steps tailored to their situation.
A Heggstad petition is a court proceeding initiated to establish that certain property intended to be placed into a trust was never properly titled but nonetheless should be treated as trust property. The petition typically presents evidence such as trust documents, deeds, beneficiary designations, contemporaneous correspondence, and testimony from witnesses or the person who created the trust if available. Courts evaluate whether the decedent’s intent to transfer the property into the trust can be proven by a preponderance of the evidence. This mechanism allows trustees to obtain court orders recognizing trust ownership and directing county recorder or third parties to transfer title accordingly.
Not every matter requires a Heggstad petition; sometimes administrative steps or title company procedures suffice. However, when third parties refuse to accept evidence of intent or when there is uncertainty in the record, filing a petition can provide the clarity needed to move forward. The process involves preparing a formal petition, supporting declarations, and exhibits, serving interested parties, and attending a hearing if objections are raised. Timely action helps avoid delays in trust administration and reduces the risk of subsequent challenges that could complicate distribution to beneficiaries or sale of trust assets.
The Heggstad petition is named after a leading California case and is used to ask a court to recognize that property was intended to be held in a trust despite not having been formally transferred prior to the settlor’s death. The petition typically requests a judicial order confirming that the asset belongs to the trust and directing necessary title changes. The goal is to treat the asset as though it had been properly transferred during the settlor’s lifetime, thereby enabling the trustee to administer trust property consistent with the trust’s terms. Effective petitions rely on documentary proof and statements that show the decedent’s consistent intent to fund the trust.
A successful Heggstad petition generally includes a clear description of the asset at issue, the trust instrument and any relevant amendments, evidence of the decedent’s intent, and supporting declarations from those with personal knowledge. The process typically begins with a thorough collection of trust documents, deeds, and related papers, followed by drafting a petition that frames the legal and factual basis for relief. After service on interested parties, the court may schedule a hearing to consider any objections. If the court is persuaded, it will issue an order that authorizes the transfer or recognition of title in the name of the trustee, enabling administration without probate for that asset.
Below are concise definitions of common terms you will encounter during a Heggstad review and petition. Understanding these terms helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the process, assemble proper documentation, and anticipate potential issues when transferring assets into a trust. These entries cover the petition itself, related estate planning documents, and distinctions between trust administration and probate, which are important when determining the appropriate legal path to secure title and effect distributions under the trust.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing used in California to ask a court to declare that specific property should be treated as trust property when formal transfer into the trust was not completed before the decedent’s death. The petition sets out proof of intent and offers supporting documents and witness testimony. If the court finds the evidence persuasive, it issues an order recognizing trust ownership and directing necessary title adjustments. This mechanism helps trustees collect and manage assets that were meant to fund a trust but remained titled in the decedent’s name, thereby streamlining trust administration.
A pour-over will is a type of testamentary document that directs any assets remaining in a decedent’s estate at death to be transferred into their trust. It acts as a safety net for property that was not funded into the trust during life. While a pour-over will still passes through probate, it ensures that residual assets ultimately go to the trust for distribution under its terms. When a pour-over will is involved with untitled property, a Heggstad petition can complement the estate process by confirming which items should be treated as trust property to align administration with the trust maker’s plan.
Trust ownership means that an asset is legally held by the trustee for the benefit of the trust’s beneficiaries according to the trust instrument. Proper title typically reflects the trustee as the legal owner for real property, bank accounts, and other assets. When title remains in the decedent’s name, discrepancies can arise between the written trust terms and public records. Correcting title often requires documentation that demonstrates the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. A Heggstad petition asks the court to bridge that gap so the trustee can administer the asset without requiring full probate for the item at issue.
Probate is the court-supervised process that administers assets titled in a decedent’s name and distributes them under a will or by intestacy rules if no will exists. Trust administration, by contrast, typically occurs outside probate and follows the terms of the trust document under the trustee’s direction. When assets are properly titled in a trust, they bypass probate administration. When title mismatches exist, a Heggstad petition can help bring an asset into trust administration without wholly subjecting the estate to the probate process, preserving the benefits of trust-based distribution where appropriate.
When untitled assets are discovered, there are alternatives to consider depending on the facts. A limited approach involves addressing one or a few assets through a focused Heggstad petition or administrative transfer, which can be quicker and less costly when parties agree. Full probate may be necessary when widespread estate matters exist or when multiple contested claims must be resolved. A broader legal strategy can include multiple petitions, negotiated settlements, or concurrent estate proceedings. Choosing the correct path depends on title complexity, potential disagreements among beneficiaries, and the nature of the assets at issue.
A limited Heggstad filing often suffices when the asset at issue is modest in value and there are no competing claims or disputes among beneficiaries. In such cases the facts supporting the intended transfer are clear and easily documented, allowing the court to enter an order recognizing trust ownership on a streamlined record. This approach minimizes legal expense and avoids the delays of a full probate administration. The firm evaluates whether a targeted petition can resolve title issues while keeping procedural burden and cost proportionate to the asset’s value and the parties’ expectations.
When contemporaneous documents, such as deeds, beneficiary designations, letters, or trust amendments, plainly indicate the decedent’s intention to fund the trust, a focused petition may be effective. Strong documentary evidence reduces the need for extended fact-finding and helps the court reach a prompt decision. Similarly, the absence of conflicting records or contested claims means the process can proceed without extensive litigation. Counsel will assess the strength of the available evidence and recommend a limited filing where it is likely to yield a favorable and cost-effective outcome.
A broader legal approach is often warranted when multiple assets are affected or when title issues are inconsistent across county records. In such situations coordinating multiple petitions, handling interrelated claims, and engaging with title companies and county recorders can be necessary to resolve matters efficiently. Litigation readiness and a well-crafted strategy protect trustee and beneficiary interests when contested claims arise. The firm combines careful pre-filing investigation with robust pleadings and court advocacy to manage complex matters that cannot be resolved by a single limited petition.
When trust provisions are nuanced or when beneficiaries raise objections about whether an asset should be part of the trust, a more comprehensive approach is needed. This can include negotiating with opponents, preparing detailed evidence, and presenting legal arguments about trust interpretation and intent. Addressing such issues often requires more extensive discovery, motion practice, or contested hearings to obtain a definitive court ruling. Planning for these possibilities from the outset helps manage costs and increases the likelihood of a clear result that enables proper trust administration.
Adopting a comprehensive strategy ensures that all affected assets and related legal issues are addressed in a coordinated manner, reducing the risk that unresolved title problems will surface later. It allows trustees to evaluate potential disputes across the entire portfolio, prioritize filings, and prepare robust evidentiary support for the court. This approach also facilitates communication with title companies, banks, and county recorders so that once an order is obtained, transfers proceed smoothly. Ultimately, a full review and coordinated plan preserves estate value and reduces the likelihood of ongoing litigation.
A comprehensive plan also provides clarity for beneficiaries and interested parties by addressing related matters proactively, such as beneficiary designations, deeds, and account titling. It creates a single, cohesive record that the court can rely on when issuing orders, which increases the likelihood of successful title resolution. For trustees, the certainty afforded by a coordinated strategy enables confident administration and distribution under the trust terms, minimizing delays and enabling equitable outcomes for all parties involved in the trust administration.
Comprehensive handling reduces the chance that individual title issues will cause repeated delays in the administration process. By identifying and addressing problems proactively, trustees can avoid multiple separate filings that prolong administration and increase expense. A coordinated approach ensures that the evidentiary record is complete, that necessary parties are noticed, and that any objections are handled in an organized manner. This efficiency benefits beneficiaries who seek timely distribution and trustees who are responsible for prudent and orderly administration of trust assets.
By pursuing a thorough strategy that documents intent and secures court recognition of trust ownership, trustees strengthen the legal foundation for title transfers and future transactions. Clear title enables the sale, refinancing, or distribution of assets without repeated challenges from third parties. This protection benefits beneficiaries by ensuring assets are administered as intended and by reducing the risk of contingent claims arising later. A comprehensive approach also documents the trustee’s diligence in addressing title matters, which supports fiduciary accountability and transparency throughout the administration process.
Begin by assembling the trust instrument, any amendments, deeds, title records, account statements, beneficiary designations, and relevant correspondence. Having a complete file simplifies evaluation and helps identify whether an asset was intended to be in the trust. Clear copies of deeds, escrow records, and prior filings can speed the preparation of a Heggstad petition and reduce the need for additional discovery. Early organization also helps the trustee prioritize filings and prepares a coherent evidentiary presentation to the court and to title companies that may later be asked to accept the court’s order.
Notify beneficiaries, potential heirs, and title companies early in the process to minimize surprises and to surface any objections promptly. Open communication can sometimes resolve disputes or lead to cooperative title changes without full litigation. When service or court filings are necessary, early notice also prepares interested parties for the timeline and potential outcomes. Working ahead with county recorders and title companies about required documentation helps ensure that once a court order is obtained, administrative transfer proceeds with fewer additional steps.
You should consider a Heggstad petition when property that should fund a trust remains titled in the decedent’s name and third parties will not accept administrative proof of trust ownership. The petition is appropriate where documentary evidence or witness testimony supports the view that funding was intended but not completed. Pursuing this legal route can prevent unnecessary probate steps for that asset, preserve the trust’s distribution plan, and expedite administration. It is also a prudent option when financial institutions or title companies require a court order to accept a trustee’s claim.
Other reasons to consider filing include protecting the estate from competing claims, clarifying title for sale or refinancing, and ensuring beneficiaries receive distributions according to the trust’s terms. When uncertainty persists about ownership or when county records conflict with the trust document, a court determination removes ambiguity. Acting promptly after discovery of untitled assets reduces the risk of lost documentation and fading witness memories, making it easier to build a persuasive record and obtain the relief needed to administer the trust properly.
One common circumstance is when property still shows the decedent as the owner despite a trust instrument indicating that the asset should be held by the trust. This mismatch often occurs with real property when a deed was not executed or recorded, or with accounts when titling changes were not completed. Addressing this promptly with a Heggstad petition or other legal steps can prevent delays in selling or distributing the asset. Trustees should assemble all supporting papers to document the intent and the circumstances that led to the title discrepancy.
Incomplete trust funding arises when some assets were properly transferred while others remained in the decedent’s name. This patchwork can complicate administration because portions of the estate follow trust terms while others require probate procedures. A Heggstad petition helps unify the treatment of assets intended for the trust by seeking a court declaration that the remaining items should be treated as trust property. Early identification of which items were missed and why enables a targeted approach that limits expense and focuses on the most important title corrections.
Conflicting county records, inconsistent account records, or multiple versions of deeds can create uncertainty about ownership. These conflicts often require review of transaction histories, escrow documents, and communications with lenders or title companies to clarify the record. When discrepancies cannot be resolved administratively, a Heggstad petition asks the court to interpret the available evidence and issue an order that reconciles records with the trust maker’s intent. Resolving these discrepancies in court results in clearer title and facilitates subsequent asset transfers or distributions.
Families in Lone Pine facing untitled trust property can contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for assistance. The firm evaluates the facts, reviews trust and title documents, and recommends a tailored plan to secure title for trust administration. Our team will explain the options, prepare the necessary filings, and handle court proceedings when required. We aim to provide clear guidance through each step while working to reduce costs and delay. Call 408-528-2827 to schedule a consultation and learn how a Heggstad petition might resolve the specific issues you are encountering.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for careful attention to document detail, practical courtroom preparation, and an emphasis on resolving title issues efficiently. We focus on assembling persuasive evidence and drafting clear petitions and declarations that present the settlor’s intent and the factual record. The firm balances negotiation and litigation readiness, seeking cooperative solutions when possible while preparing robust filings if disputes require court resolution. Our approach seeks a fair, timely outcome that aligns with the trust maker’s plan and protects beneficiaries’ interests throughout administration.
Local knowledge of California probate and trust procedures, including familiarity with Inyo County practice, supports effective handling of filings and hearings. We communicate with county recorder offices, title companies, and other entities to ensure that court orders obtain the intended administrative effect. This coordination is vital when documents must be recorded or when financial institutions require specific language or orders. Early liaison with such entities often streamlines the post-order transfer process and reduces surprises that can slow trust administration.
Our practice emphasizes transparent communication about scope, costs, and likely timelines to help clients make informed decisions. From initial case assessment through court order and recording, we explain the steps involved and the evidence needed to support a petition. Trustees and beneficiaries receive regular updates and clear recommendations tailored to the facts of their matter. This practical, client-focused approach helps families in Lone Pine and elsewhere navigate what can be a stressful process while protecting estate value and promoting predictable outcomes.
Our process begins with a careful intake and document review to understand the facts, followed by a tailored plan that may include targeted petitions, broader filings, or negotiated resolutions. We compile trust instruments, deeds, account statements, and witness declarations to create a persuasive record for the court. After preparing the petition and required exhibits, we serve interested parties and address any objections that arise, seeking resolution through motion practice or hearing as necessary. The goal is to obtain a clear court order that enables title transfer and proper trust administration in an efficient manner.
The first step focuses on gathering all relevant documentation and identifying any gaps in title or account records. This includes the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, letters or emails indicating intent, and prior communications with title companies or institutions. We interview trustees and witnesses to understand the context around attempted transfers, and we review county records to map discrepancies. A thorough collection and review reduces surprises later in the case and prepares the foundation for a persuasive petition that the court can evaluate with the benefit of a well-organized factual record.
Detailed review of the trust and relevant title records identifies precisely where transfers were incomplete and which assets require action. We reconcile recorded deeds, account titling, and beneficiary designations with the trust terms to determine the best path forward. This review often uncovers secondary documentation that supports the trust maker’s intent. By assembling everything in chronological order, the petition can show a clear narrative to the court. This preparation also informs whether a limited filing or a broader strategy is appropriate based on the number and complexity of affected assets.
Witness statements, such as declarations from family members, caregivers, or professionals who discussed funding the trust with the settlor, can be persuasive. We collect and prepare sworn declarations that describe conversations, actions taken, and the settlor’s consistent intent. Photographs, correspondence, and contemporaneous notes can corroborate those statements. Together with documentary records, these statements build the evidentiary foundation needed for the court to recognize the asset as trust property. Ensuring that declarations are clear, factual, and well-organized improves the petition’s effectiveness.
Once the factual record is assembled, we draft the petition, accompanying declarations, and exhibits that frame the legal argument for recognition of trust ownership. The papers explain the factual history, identify the asset(s), and cite governing law supporting the requested relief. Attention to clarity and evidence-based assertions helps the court assess the claim efficiently. We also plan for service of process on interested parties and coordinate with title companies and county recorder offices where possible to anticipate administrative requirements once a court order is obtained.
Declarations are carefully drafted to present witness observations and documentary support in a concise, credible manner. Exhibits are labeled and organized so the court can readily verify facts. The petition ties these materials together, establishing a timeline and showing consistent intent to fund the trust. Clear, factual declarations reduce the need for extended discovery and help the judge assess credibility. Preparing strong evidentiary materials increases the chance of a favorable ruling and smooths the subsequent process of recording or title transfer under the court order.
Proper service on heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties ensures notice and allows them to object if they believe the asset should not be treated as trust property. We prepare proof of service and monitor responses, seeking amicable resolution where possible. When objections are raised, we respond with focused briefing and evidence to address factual disputes or legal questions. Handling objections proactively and professionally often narrows disputes and prepares the record for an efficient hearing that enables the court to reach a clear decision.
If objections require a hearing, we present the assembled evidence and legal argument to the court and request an order recognizing the asset as trust property. The court’s order typically instructs the appropriate parties or the county recorder to reflect the trustee as the owner or otherwise authorizes steps to transfer title. After securing the order, we coordinate with title companies and recorders to effect the administrative changes necessary for sale, refinancing, or distribution under the trust. Finalizing these steps completes the asset’s transition into trust administration.
At hearing, a focused presentation of declarations, documents, and factual chronology helps the court understand why recognition of the asset as trust property is appropriate. We organize testimony and exhibits to highlight consistent intent and reduce ambiguity. Counsel make succinct legal arguments that draw on governing precedent and statutes to explain why the requested order aligns with the trust maker’s plan. A clear, evidence-based hearing presentation increases the likelihood of obtaining the court’s favorable determination and a practical order that facilitates title correction.
Once the court issues an order, we assist with recording the order, providing certified copies to title companies, and coordinating with county recorders to ensure the trustee’s name appears on title records as required. We also prepare any further documentation needed by banks or other institutions to release assets to the trustee. Careful follow-through prevents delays in sale or distribution and ensures the administrative steps align with the court’s directive. The end result is clear title and a defined path to complete trust administration for the affected asset.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used to request recognition that a specific asset should be treated as trust property despite not being formally retitled prior to the settlor’s death. The petition asks the court to evaluate evidence showing the settlor intended the asset to fund the trust and, if the court agrees, to issue an order recognizing the trustee’s ownership. This process helps align title records with the trust terms so the trustee can administer or transfer the asset without unnecessary probate steps. The petition is commonly used when deeds, account titles, or other records remain in the decedent’s name and third parties require a court order to accept the trustee’s claim. It is appropriate when documentary evidence and witness statements can demonstrate the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. The court weighs the evidence presented and issues an order if the proof is persuasive, allowing the trustee to proceed with administration under the trust’s terms.
Resolution time for a Heggstad petition varies with case-specific factors such as the completeness of documentation, whether interested parties object, and the court’s schedule. When facts are straightforward and there are no objections, a petition can sometimes be resolved on a noticed motion or at an uncontested hearing within a matter of weeks to a few months. Administrative coordination with county recorders or title companies after an order is issued can add additional time to effectuate title changes. If objections are filed, the process may extend as parties conduct discovery, submit briefing, and attend contested hearings. Complex factual disputes or multiple affected assets can lengthen the timeline. Early preparation, clear evidence, and outreach to interested parties often reduce delays, while contested matters require more court time and procedural steps before a final order is obtained.
Supportive evidence for a Heggstad petition commonly includes the trust instrument and any amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and contemporaneous correspondence that indicate the settlor’s intent. Deeds showing earlier attempts to transfer property, escrow or title company communications, and receipts or settlement statements can be helpful. Witness declarations from family members, caregivers, or professionals who recall the settlor’s expressed intent to fund the trust are also important. The court looks for a coherent factual narrative demonstrating consistent intent to treat the asset as part of the trust. Organizing documents chronologically and providing clear, factual declarations that corroborate the documentary record strengthens the petition. The presence of multiple, independent sources of evidence tends to be more persuasive than reliance on a single document or recollection.
A Heggstad petition can avoid probate for the specific asset it addresses by obtaining a court order that recognizes the asset as trust property, enabling the trustee to administer it under the trust terms. This means that the particular item transferred to the trust by court order does not need to pass through probate. However, other assets not subject to the petition or not otherwise properly funded into the trust may still require probate administration. Therefore, while a Heggstad petition can prevent probate for targeted assets, it does not automatically resolve all estate administration issues. Trustees should identify all untitled assets and consider whether additional petitions or probate filings are necessary to address the remaining property and ensure distributions align with the settlor’s plan.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties may oppose a Heggstad petition by filing objections in the court where the petition is filed. Objections commonly raise factual disputes about the settlor’s intent, question the sufficiency of evidence, or assert competing claims to the asset. When objections are filed, the parties may engage in discovery, submit additional evidence, and participate in contested hearings to resolve those disputes. When opposition arises, the court evaluates the competing evidence and legal arguments to determine whether the asset should be recognized as trust property. Effective preparation, clear declarations, and thorough documentation can address many objections. In cases where disputes remain, the court’s decision will provide final resolution, and the order will guide subsequent title transfers and administration steps.
Costs for a Heggstad petition depend on the complexity of the factual record, the need for witness declarations and document gathering, and whether the matter is contested. Simple matters with clear documentation and no objections typically require fewer attorney hours and lower filing fees, while contested cases with discovery and hearings incur higher costs. Additional expenses can include court filing fees, fees for certified copies or recorded documents, and possible costs for specialist services such as title searches or appraisals. During an initial consultation, we discuss a reasonable fee range based on the known facts and anticipated steps. We provide transparent information about likely expenses and try to limit unnecessary work. Early investigation and organization of records often reduce time and expense by narrowing factual issues and avoiding protracted discovery or multiple filings.
A Heggstad petition does not change the substantive terms of the trust; rather it seeks a court order that certain property be treated as part of the trust so the trustee can administer that asset under the existing trust provisions. The petition addresses title and ownership recognition, not the distribution scheme contained in the trust instrument. If the petition succeeds, the asset is managed and distributed according to the trust’s terms just as if it had been properly titled during the settlor’s life. If parties seek to alter trust terms themselves, different procedures apply and those matters raise distinct legal issues. The Heggstad petition specifically focuses on aligning title with the trust maker’s intent, preserving the trust’s instructions rather than modifying them.
Court involvement is generally necessary when third parties such as title companies or recorders require a judicial determination to accept a trustee’s claim of ownership. In many cases, administrative efforts to provide documentation will not suffice, and a formal petition must be filed and served on interested parties so the court can issue binding orders. The court’s authority to issue an order is what enables record changes and gives third parties confidence to recognize the trustee’s ownership. There are limited circumstances where informal resolution or agreement among interested parties may allow transfer without court proceedings, but those solutions require cooperation and adequate documentation. Where cooperation is lacking or where title providers insist on judicial confirmation, filing the petition is the reliable route to secure title and effectuate the trustee’s duties.
If title companies refuse to accept a Heggstad order, the next steps typically include clarifying the reason for refusal and providing supplementary documentation such as certified court orders, recorded instruments, or additional affidavits. Sometimes further communication between counsel and the title company or county recorder resolves misunderstandings or compliance questions. When administrative steps do not resolve the issue, additional court filings or clarification orders can be sought to address specific deficiencies identified by the title company. Working directly with the recorder’s office and the title insurer often resolves procedural obstacles once the court’s order is clear and properly recorded. If disputes persist, counsel may seek further judicial direction or pursue the formal remedies necessary to compel recognition of the trustee’s title in accordance with the court’s ruling and recording requirements.
To prepare for a Heggstad petition on behalf of a loved one, start by assembling relevant documents such as the trust instrument, any amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, escrow records, emails, and any notes indicating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Speak with individuals who had direct conversations with the settlor and ask them to memorialize their recollections in writing. Early organization makes it easier for counsel to evaluate the strength of a petition and to identify any additional documents or steps required. Also gather contact information for potential interested parties and title companies, and note any prior communications with financial institutions or recorders. Promptly addressing untitled assets while memories and documents remain accessible improves the likelihood of building a persuasive record and achieving timely resolution through a court order or cooperative administrative solution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas