A Heggstad petition can be an essential legal step when assets intended for a trust were never formally retitled into that trust before the settlor passed away. In Bodfish and across Kern County, this petition provides a pathway to move those assets into the trust without full probate administration when the trust and supporting documents demonstrate the decedent’s clear intent. This page explains how a Heggstad petition works in California, what evidence the court typically requires, and how families can seek a fast, practical resolution to make sure trust property is distributed as intended under the trust terms rather than through a lengthy probate process.
Understanding the Heggstad process helps families protect estate plans and avoid unnecessary delay and expense. The petition asks a probate court to treat assets as if they had been properly transferred to a trust prior to death, based on documentation and conduct demonstrating that intent. While not every untransferred asset will qualify, many cases involving bank accounts, real property, or retirement accounts can be resolved through this procedure. The following sections give a clear overview of the legal standards, typical case elements, timelines, and what to expect when pursuing a Heggstad petition in Bodfish, Kern County, California.
A Heggstad petition serves as a practical remedy when assets intended for a trust were never moved into the trust’s name before the settlor passed. The benefits include potential avoidance of full probate, faster transfer of assets to beneficiaries, and adherence to the settlor’s estate plan. Filing such a petition can reduce court involvement, limit costs, and preserve privacy compared with an open probate administration. Importantly, it can also prevent disputes by producing a court order that clarifies ownership and confirms that assets should be treated as trust property, which can be critical for financial institutions and title companies asked to accept the trust’s claim.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides comprehensive estate planning and trust administration services across California, including matters arising in Kern County and Bodfish. Our team focuses on clear communication, practical solutions, and personal attention to each family’s needs. We have a long track record helping clients address common estate planning challenges such as transfer gaps, trust funding errors, and petitions to confirm trust ownership. With a strong knowledge of California statutes and local court procedures, we assist clients from initial document review through filing and courtroom proceedings if needed, always prioritizing efficient and respectful resolution for the family.
A Heggstad petition requests a court declaration that certain assets were intended to be trust property despite never being re-titled before the trust maker’s death. The legal foundation relies on evidence of intent, such as a trust document, transfer documents, beneficiary designations, or testimony showing the settlor’s consistent plan to fund the trust. Courts evaluate several factors, including the nature of the asset, contemporaneous transactions, and whether the available documents and actions support the claim that the asset belonged to the trust at death. This remedy aims to honor the settlor’s plan while minimizing the burden of full probate administration.
Not every funding oversight will qualify for a favorable ruling, and outcomes can vary by case. For example, a bank account with a payable-on-death designation or joint account issues may require different evidence than real estate or retirement plan accounts. The petition process involves filing in the appropriate probate court in the county where the decedent lived, providing notice to interested parties, and presenting supporting evidence. Courts may grant the petition, deny it, or approve a limited transfer; understanding the local practice and preparing a well-documented submission makes a meaningful difference in results.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial determination that a particular asset was effectively intended to be part of a trust even though formal transfer was not completed. To succeed, petitioners typically show the trust instrument, supporting documents, and actions by the settlor that demonstrate clear intent. Evidence may include draft deeds, transfer instructions, beneficiary designations consistent with trust goals, correspondence, and witness statements. The court essentially asks whether the asset should be treated as trust property based on the totality of the circumstances, enabling distribution according to the trust terms rather than by intestate succession or probate will provisions.
When evaluating a Heggstad petition, courts focus on specific elements such as the existence of a valid trust, the settlor’s intent to fund the trust, documentation that supports the claim, and whether transfers were attempted or planned before death. The court also considers whether notice was given to potential heirs and creditors and whether any competing claims exist. Demonstrating a consistent plan to fund the trust and contemporaneous steps taken toward transfer strengthens the petition. Careful preparation of affidavits, documentary proof, and a clear explanation of the chain of events often influences the court’s decision and the speed of resolution.
Understanding the terminology that appears in Heggstad petitions and trust administration can reduce confusion. Common terms include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, probate, trust funding, and pour-over will. Each term has distinct implications for transfer, control, and distribution of assets. Clarifying these concepts early on helps family members, fiduciaries, and courts focus on the evidence and legal standards that govern whether a contested asset should be treated as trust property. The following glossary entries provide accessible definitions and practical context for terms you will encounter during the petition process.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used in California to ask a probate court to recognize that an asset should be treated as trust property despite not being formally transferred into the trust before the settlor’s death. The petition relies on evidence of the settlor’s intent, such as the trust document, related transfer paperwork, and conduct demonstrating an effort to fund the trust. When approved, the court issues an order confirming the asset’s status as trust property, enabling distribution under the trust terms rather than through standard probate administration procedures.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring ownership of assets into the name of the trust so that those assets are governed by the trust document. Funding can include retitling bank and investment accounts, recording deeds for real estate, updating beneficiary designations, and assigning ownership of personal property. Proper funding ensures that assets pass according to the trust’s terms, often avoiding probate. Funding oversights are a common reason families consider a Heggstad petition when the settlor’s intent to fund was clear but formal transfers were incomplete at the time of death.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs any assets remaining in a deceased person’s individual name to be transferred into an existing trust upon death. Although it provides a safety net for unfunded assets, a pour-over will typically requires probate to move those assets into the trust. A Heggstad petition, in contrast, seeks to avoid probate for assets that should have been in the trust by proving intent and relevant actions taken before death, potentially allowing direct administration under the trust without the need for full probate proceedings.
Probate is the court-supervised process that validates a will, identifies assets, pays debts and taxes, and distributes remaining property to heirs. Probate can be time-consuming, public, and costly compared with trust administration when assets have been properly retitled. One purpose of trust planning is to minimize assets that must pass through probate. A Heggstad petition can help avoid probate for assets that were intended for a trust by seeking a court order that those assets belong to the trust, thereby allowing distribution according to the trust instrument instead of probate procedures.
When an asset was not properly transferred to a trust before death, families face choices: pursue probate, file a Heggstad petition, or consider other remedies such as small estate procedures or beneficiary designation claims. Probate can be necessary but often takes more time and expense. A Heggstad petition can be faster and preserve privacy when the evidence supports trust ownership. However, if evidence is insufficient or heirs dispute the claim, probate or negotiated settlement may be the practical outcome. Analyzing the asset type, documentation, and likely opposition helps determine which option best serves the estate and beneficiaries.
A limited approach may suffice when the asset in question is small in value or the documentation clearly supports trust ownership, such as a bank account with trust-related paperwork or a deed prepared but not recorded. In such cases, a narrowly framed petition or administrative action can bring the asset under the trust’s control without full probate. This approach can reduce legal fees and time in court, especially when heirs and interested parties agree or when the evidence is straightforward. The goal is to achieve a practical outcome that honors the settlor’s intent while conserving estate resources.
A limited petition can be appropriate when there is direct documentary evidence of intent and no anticipated opposition from beneficiaries or creditors. Examples include contemporaneous transfer instructions, consistent beneficiary designations, or signed deeds indicating trust ownership. When the facts are clear and potential interested parties are cooperative, the court may grant relief quickly with minimal litigation. This path prioritizes efficiency and aims to confirm trust ownership in a straightforward manner so distributions proceed according to the trust without the broader scope of probate administration.
A more comprehensive approach becomes important when assets are complex, titled in ways that create uncertainty, or when heirs contest ownership. Real property with competing claims, retirement accounts with unclear beneficiary designations, or closely held business interests often require in-depth legal analysis and a broader strategy. In disputed matters, documentation, witness testimony, and procedural compliance are critical, and negotiations or litigation may be necessary. A comprehensive plan evaluates all legal avenues, identifies risks, and coordinates filing strategies to seek confirmation of trust ownership while protecting the estate from avoidable liabilities.
When numerous heirs, creditors, or third parties have competing claims to an asset, a thorough legal approach is often required. This includes careful notice procedures, potential guardianship or conservatorship coordination, and strategic filing to avoid future challenges. Courts will want to ensure that all interested parties receive proper notice and opportunity to be heard, which can complicate and lengthen the process. Preparing a comprehensive filing that anticipates disputes and addresses creditor concerns improves the chance of a favorable outcome and reduces the likelihood of later relitigation.
A comprehensive approach combines meticulous documentation, appropriate court filings, and careful communication with interested parties to achieve a durable court order that confirms trust ownership. Benefits include a lower risk of later challenges, clearer instructions for financial institutions and title companies, and a streamlined path for distribution under the trust terms. Although a fuller process can take more time upfront, it often prevents greater delay and expense later, especially when large or complicated assets are involved or when potential heirs might dispute the settlor’s intentions.
Comprehensive representation also helps protect fiduciaries by ensuring statutory notice and procedure compliance and by securing judicial approval that reduces future liability. This assurance can be particularly important for trustees who must make decisions about distributing property. By anticipating court concerns and preparing evidence in advance, a thorough strategy aims to produce finality for the estate, enabling beneficiaries to receive assets with fewer administrative hurdles and giving trustees confidence that their actions align with the court’s order and the trust’s terms.
One major advantage of a full, well-documented petition is reducing the chance that interested parties will later challenge the transfer. When the court issues a clear order after considering evidence and giving notice, that order carries weight in subsequent disputes. The clarity provided by a court determination helps financial institutions and title companies accept the transfer and reduces the risk that beneficiaries or creditors will reopen the matter. This finality saves time and money and promotes a smoother conclusion to the estate’s administration for trustees and heirs alike.
A comprehensive filing often yields more predictable results and clearer title for real property and other assets. When a court examines the full record and issues an order confirming trust ownership, subsequent transfers and title changes proceed with greater confidence. Lenders and title companies typically accept a judicial order as strong evidence of ownership, which helps complete sales or refinancing and allows trustees to manage or distribute assets without lingering uncertainty. Clear documentation and a court determination minimize administrative delay and support a practical resolution of the estate.
Collecting the trust document, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, transfer instructions, and any correspondence showing the settlor’s intent is the first and most important step. Documentation that shows consistent planning or attempted transfers before death strengthens a petition dramatically. Also obtain copies of wills, pour-over documents, and related estate planning paperwork. Lenders, banks, and title companies often require a court order and clear documentation to accept a transfer, so thorough preparation reduces friction and helps the court evaluate whether the asset belonged to the trust at the time of death.
Depending on asset value and complexity, alternative procedures such as small estate affidavits, beneficiary designation claims, or negotiated settlements may be practical options. For modest assets or when heirs agree, these alternatives can avoid court time and expense. However, for valuable or disputed assets, a Heggstad petition may provide a stronger, court-backed path to transfer. Assessing the likely opposition, potential costs, and the extent of documentary support helps determine whether a limited administrative step or a formal petition is the most appropriate route for preserving estate resources.
Families commonly consider a Heggstad petition when the settlor intended the trust to hold certain assets but formal transfer was overlooked before death. This can happen with newly created trusts, last-minute changes, or simple administrative oversights. The petition offers a path to honor the settlor’s plan without resorting to full probate for each unfunded asset. Many clients seek this remedy to minimize delay, reduce costs, and preserve privacy for the estate. Courts appreciate clear documentation and a careful approach when deciding whether to treat assets as trust property.
Another reason to pursue this petition is to provide clarity for trustees and financial institutions. When a court issues an order confirming trust ownership, it becomes easier to transfer title, close accounts, or distribute assets according to the trust document. This judicial confirmation reduces the risk of later disputes and gives trustees a defensible basis for acting on behalf of the trust. Pursuing a petition is often a practical decision aimed at concluding the estate administration efficiently while honoring the decedent’s estate plan.
Typical circumstances include a trust that remains newly created and unfunded at death, a deed prepared but not recorded, bank or investment accounts still in the decedent’s name, retirement accounts with ambiguous beneficiary designations, and handwritten notes or instructions indicating intent to fund the trust. Overlooked assets are often discovered during asset inventory or when a trustee attempts to administer the estate. When the documentation and surrounding facts demonstrate a consistent plan to fund the trust, a Heggstad petition becomes a viable option to align title with the decedent’s intentions.
Real property intended for a trust but lacking a recorded deed in the trust’s name is a frequent reason to consider a Heggstad petition. Evidence such as draft deeds, escrow instructions, or contemporaneous statements showing intent to transfer can support the petition. When courts find that the decedent intended the property to be part of the trust, they can order the property treated as trust assets, facilitating transfer or sale according to the trust’s terms and avoiding full probate for that asset. Clear documentation and timely filing are important to increase the likelihood of success.
Bank accounts, brokerage accounts, and other financial assets often remain in an individual’s name due to oversight. Supporting evidence like account change requests, correspondence with financial institutions, or consistent trust beneficiary designations can support a Heggstad claim. A court order confirming trust ownership enables institutions to transfer funds into the trust and permits trustees to manage and distribute assets as written in the trust. Prompt action and clear records improve the likelihood that the petition will be resolved efficiently.
Retirement accounts often present complications when beneficiary designations conflict with a trust or when no changes were made before death. In such cases, documentation showing the settlor’s consistent plan for trust distribution, or evidence that the settlor intended the account proceeds to flow into the trust, supports court intervention. Resolving these conflicts through a petition can clarify whether the account proceeds should be transferred to the trust or distributed in another manner, providing certainty to beneficiaries and those managing the estate.
If you are dealing with assets that were intended for a trust but not transferred before death in Bodfish or nearby Kern County communities, experienced legal assistance can help you evaluate options and prepare the necessary filings. We guide families through document collection, drafting, notice, and courtroom procedures when required. Our approach focuses on practical resolution, clear communication with interested parties, and careful preparation of the evidence the court needs to decide whether assets should be treated as trust property, so distributions proceed according to the decedent’s plan.
Choosing a law firm to handle a Heggstad petition means selecting a team that understands California probate practice and local court procedures. We bring experience in preparing petitions, collecting and organizing supporting documents, and presenting a persuasive case to the court. Our process emphasizes early fact-gathering, thorough notice, and clear presentation of the settlor’s intent. Clients benefit from consistent communication and practical guidance on how to minimize delay and expense while seeking an outcome that aligns with the trust terms and the family’s goals.
We also assist trustees and fiduciaries who need confidence that their actions comply with legal requirements. When a court issues an order after a petition, trustees have clearer authority to transfer or distribute assets without ongoing uncertainty. This reduces the risk of future disputes and helps close out the estate more efficiently. Throughout the process, we help clients anticipate potential objections, prepare necessary notices, and coordinate with financial institutions and title companies to implement the court’s order once granted.
Approaching these matters with careful documentation and strategic planning can make a significant difference in timing and outcome. We work to identify the strongest path under the facts presented, whether seeking a limited administrative resolution, filing a Heggstad petition, or pursuing other available remedies. Our goal is to provide practical, court-aware representation that moves assets into the trust when appropriate, respects the decedent’s intentions, and achieves a resolution that serves the interests of trustees and beneficiaries.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust document and all available records to determine whether a Heggstad petition is an appropriate remedy. We collect and organize supporting evidence, prepare the petition and necessary declarations, and ensure that proper notice is given to interested parties. If the court requires a hearing, we present the facts and documentation to support the petition. After a favorable order, we assist with follow-up tasks such as coordinating with banks and title companies to effectuate transfers and complete trust administration smoothly.
The initial step focuses on assembling the trust, deeds, account statements, correspondence, and any records indicating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. We identify gaps and seek contemporaneous evidence such as transfer drafts, escrow files, beneficiary forms, and witness statements that corroborate the trust funding plan. The goal is to build a clear narrative supported by documentation that demonstrates why the asset should be treated as trust property. Thorough preparation at this stage sets the foundation for a persuasive petition and minimizes procedural delays.
We work with trustees and family members to locate and obtain copies of all relevant documents, including the trust instrument, wills, deeds, account records, and correspondence showing transfer plans. This often requires outreach to banks, title companies, and retirement plan administrators to request account histories and beneficiary forms. Detailed documentation helps demonstrate intent and provides the court with the factual basis to consider the petition. Early, organized collection of records streamlines preparation and reduces the chance of missing crucial evidence that could affect the petition outcome.
Alongside documentary evidence, sworn declarations and testimony from witnesses who observed the settlor’s intent or actions play an important role. We prepare clear, concise affidavits that explain the context of transfers, the settlor’s statements, and any attempted funding efforts. These personal accounts, aligned with documentary proof, help the court evaluate the strength of the claim. Careful witness preparation and thoughtful presentation of evidence can make a significant difference in persuading the court to recognize assets as trust property.
After assembling the record, we draft and file the Heggstad petition with the appropriate county probate court and follow statutory notice requirements to inform heirs, beneficiaries, and creditors. Proper service and compliance with court rules are essential to avoid procedural challenges that could delay consideration. We also prepare the court filing to clearly explain the basis for relief and to attach the supporting documents and declarations. Early attention to procedural details helps create a smooth path to a hearing and a potential order.
The petition must present a coherent narrative supported by documents and sworn statements that show the settlor intended the asset to be trust property. We structure the filing to make the legal issues and factual record easy for the court to evaluate, highlighting key evidence and explaining how it supports a Heggstad determination. Clear legal argumentation, accompanied by a well-organized evidentiary record, reduces the need for additional discovery and increases the chances of an efficient resolution.
Proper notice to all interested parties and compliance with statutory timelines is critical. We ensure notice is served according to the rules and anticipate potential objections by preparing responses and possible compromise proposals. If objections arise, we work to resolve disputes through negotiation when possible but are prepared to present the evidence at a court hearing to seek a definitive ruling. Addressing procedural and substantive objections early helps move the case forward and prevents avoidable delays.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the assembled evidence, affidavits, and legal argument to support the petition. The court may grant the petition, deny it, or issue a tailored order that addresses the specific asset. Once an order is issued, we assist the trustee in implementing the decision, including transferring title, notifying institutions, filing any necessary documents to effectuate changes, and completing trust administration tasks. This post-order assistance ensures that the court’s ruling translates into practical transfer and distribution of assets as intended.
At the hearing, presenting the evidence clearly and persuasively is key. We focus on demonstrating the settlor’s intent through documents and witness testimony, explain any attempted transfers prior to death, and address counterarguments. Our goal is to minimize procedural surprises and show the court why the assets should be treated as trust property. A concise, well-supported presentation helps the court reach a reasoned decision and often shortens the time required to secure an order confirming ownership.
Once the court issues an order, action is needed to transfer titles and notify financial institutions. We assist trustees in providing the order to banks, title companies, and account administrators and in completing any follow-up filings required to update records. This implementation phase ensures that the legal determination results in actual control and distribution of assets under the trust, allowing beneficiaries to receive their shares and trustees to fulfill their duties with documented judicial authorization.
A Heggstad petition is a California probate filing that asks the court to treat certain assets as trust property even though those assets were not formally retitled into the trust before the settlor’s death. It is used when documentation and conduct indicate the settlor intended the assets to be part of the trust, and when seeking to avoid probate for those specific assets makes sense. The petition provides a means to obtain judicial confirmation so the assets can be administered under the trust terms rather than through probate. To succeed, petitioners must present a clear evidentiary record showing intent and steps taken or planned to transfer the assets. Courts evaluate the totality of circumstances, including written instruments, transfer documents, and witness accounts. The petition process includes notice to interested parties, and the court may schedule a hearing to assess the record and issue an order that reflects its determination about trust ownership.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies based on asset complexity, court schedules, and whether objections arise. In straightforward, uncontested matters with strong documentation, the process can move relatively quickly, sometimes within a few months from filing to order. When title issues, creditor claims, or disputes among heirs appear, the timeline extends and can take longer depending on hearings and required discovery. Local court practices and caseloads also influence timing in Kern County. Early preparation and proper notice help speed the process by reducing procedural objections. Gathering complete records before filing, sending timely notice to interested parties, and preparing concise legal argumentation typically leads to a more efficient court review. If disputes arise, attempting negotiation or mediation before a contested hearing can also shorten the overall resolution time.
Courts look for persuasive evidence that the decedent intended the asset to be trust property. Useful documents include the trust instrument, draft or recorded deeds showing intent to transfer real property, beneficiary designation forms consistent with the trust plan, bank or account change requests, and correspondence or notes reflecting the settlor’s intent. Sworn declarations from witnesses who recall the settlor’s statements or actions also carry weight. The stronger and more contemporaneous the evidence, the better the petition’s prospects. Courts assess the totality of circumstances rather than a single item of proof, so assembling a coherent record that ties documents and witness accounts together is important. Demonstrating consistent planning and any efforts taken toward transfer before death strengthens the petition. Absence of evidence or conflicting documents may require a more detailed factual presentation or could lead to denial if insufficient proof exists.
A trustee’s power to transfer property depends on the trust instrument and applicable law, but when title remains in the decedent’s name, banks and title companies often require a court order to accept transfer into the trust. Acting without clear legal authority can expose a trustee to disputes or liability from heirs or creditors. When ownership is ambiguous, seeking court confirmation through a petition or obtaining legal advice before initiating transfers helps protect the trustee and the estate. In some situations where documentation is clear and institutions accept a trustee’s direction, transfers can occur without court involvement, but this is less common when the title is still in the decedent’s name. Trustees should carefully consider risks and obtain appropriate written confirmations from institutions or a court order when uncertainty exists to avoid later challenges and to ensure compliance with legal duties.
Creditors and heirs will not always oppose a Heggstad petition, but opposition can occur if parties believe the assets should pass through probate or if they dispute the settlor’s intent. Proper notice and transparent communication reduce the likelihood of opposition. In many cases, when evidence is clear and beneficiaries understand the petition’s purpose, challenges are avoided and the court can resolve the matter without contested litigation. If opposition arises, the process may require hearings and additional evidence. Preparing a strong, well-documented petition and following correct notice procedures helps address creditor concerns and provides interested parties with adequate opportunity to respond. When disputes cannot be resolved through discussion, the court will weigh the evidence and issue a determination based on the facts and applicable statutes.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document that directs assets remaining in an individual’s name to be transferred into a trust at death, usually requiring probate to effect that transfer. A Heggstad petition, in contrast, seeks a court order that certain assets should be treated as trust property based on evidence the settlor intended to fund the trust before death, potentially avoiding probate for those specific assets. The two mechanisms can interact, but they operate differently and have distinct practical implications for timing and procedure. When a pour-over will exists, probate is typically necessary to move unfunded assets into the trust, whereas a successful Heggstad petition can achieve similar ends for particular assets without full probate. Which path is preferable depends on the assets involved, available evidence, and whether interested parties contest the ownership claim.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the asset will generally remain subject to probate or other appropriate procedures for distribution. A denial may occur when evidence is insufficient to show that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust at death. In that event, parties may pursue probate administration, negotiate a settlement among heirs, or consider whether other statutory remedies are available depending on the asset type and facts. Before filing, it is important to evaluate the strength of the supporting evidence and consider alternatives. If a petition is denied, parties often reassess their options, gather additional documentation if available, and determine whether an appeal or different procedural path is realistic and consistent with estate goals and costs.
There are alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition depending on the asset and value. Small estate procedures can handle modest assets without formal probate in some cases. Beneficiary designation claims, negotiated agreements among heirs, or administrative transfers accepted by financial institutions may resolve matters without court filings. Each alternative has pros and cons related to cost, speed, and finality. Determining the suitable path depends on the specific asset, the clarity of documentation, and the likelihood of dispute. Evaluating alternatives early helps families choose the most efficient and cost-effective approach. When evidence strongly supports trust ownership, a petition may still be the best way to secure a definitive court order. For lower-value assets or cooperative situations, administrative or negotiated solutions may achieve the desired outcome without the time and expense of court proceedings.
Banks, title companies, and account administrators commonly accept a court order as authoritative proof of ownership changes or authority to transfer assets. A judicial determination that an asset belongs to a trust generally provides the documentation these institutions require to retitle accounts or record deeds. Presenting a clear, certified order with the necessary supporting paperwork typically resolves institutional hesitancy and enables practical implementation of the court’s decision. Even with a favorable order, some institutions may request additional documentation or internal reviews before completing transfers, so post-order coordination is often necessary. We work with trustees to provide the order and any supplementary materials requested by institutions to ensure a smooth transition and practical effect of the court’s ruling.
To begin a Heggstad petition in Bodfish or Kern County, start by collecting the trust document, account and property records, and any correspondence or drafts showing intent to transfer assets. Contacting counsel early helps assess the strength of the evidence and the appropriate court strategy. Properly identifying interested parties and preparing to provide required notice is an immediate procedural step that should not be overlooked. After initial document review, counsel can advise whether a Heggstad petition is likely to succeed or if alternative remedies are more suitable. If proceeding with a petition, preparing a thorough evidentiary record, complying with notice rules, and presenting a clear legal argument to the court improve the chances of a favorable outcome and help bring the estate to a practical resolution.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas