A Heggstad petition can be an important tool for beneficiaries and trustees dealing with the aftermath of a deceased person’s estate where assets were not properly transferred into a trust before death. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients in China Lake Acres and Kern County understand when a petition to treat assets as trust property is appropriate and how the process works under California law. This overview explains the basics of a Heggstad petition, what it seeks to accomplish, and who typically benefits from filing one in probate court when trust administration is involved.
When property titled in a decedent’s name should have been included in a living trust but remains outside the trust, a Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that the decedent intended the assets to be trust property. The procedure can prevent unnecessary probate, clarify title for real estate, and ensure the decedent’s estate plan is carried out as intended. This section describes typical scenarios for a Heggstad petition in California, practical steps petitioners can expect, and how local courts in Kern County generally handle these matters to provide a smoother transition of assets to trust beneficiaries.
Filing a Heggstad petition can be a cost-effective alternative to full probate because it clarifies whether specific assets should be treated as part of a trust without requiring complete probate administration. This can save time, reduce fees, and limit court involvement while protecting beneficiaries’ interests. A successful petition provides clear court recognition that certain property belongs to the trust, which simplifies title transfers, allows trustees to manage and distribute assets, and reduces the risk of future disputes among heirs or creditors. The process also helps preserve the settlor’s intent and keeps more assets within the trust framework.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides focused estate planning services to clients across California, including individuals and families in China Lake Acres and Kern County. Our team assists with trust administration, will preparation, and petitions that arise when trust transfers are incomplete, such as Heggstad petitions. We emphasize clear communication, practical legal steps, and thorough preparation of court filings to help our clients achieve predictable results. Our practice covers a wide range of estate planning documents and court procedures, and we guide clients through decisions about trust administration, asset transfers, and resolving title issues after a loved one’s death.
A Heggstad petition is grounded in California case law and allows a petitioner to ask the probate court to treat property as if it had been transferred to a trust during the decedent’s lifetime. The petition typically includes evidence such as trust documents, deeds, affidavits, and testimony describing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Courts examine the totality of circumstances to determine whether the decedent intended the property to be part of the trust, and that intent can come from written trust provisions, contemporaneous documents, or reliable witness accounts. Understanding the legal standard and evidentiary needs is essential to preparing a persuasive petition.
Petitioners must be prepared to document transfers, show the trust instrument, and identify the relationship between the decedent, trustee, and beneficiaries. The court will consider whether the trustee and beneficiaries acted consistently with the belief that the property belonged to the trust. In some cases, title evidence such as deeds or beneficiary designations needs correction, and a Heggstad petition can serve as an equitable remedy to reflect the decedent’s true intent. Knowing the types of proof that courts accept helps families take efficient, effective steps to resolve unclear asset ownership without unnecessary litigation.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that specific property should be treated as trust property despite being titled in the decedent’s name at death. The petition relies on evidence that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust, such as trust provisions, transfer attempts, or conduct showing intent. If granted, the court’s order allows the trustee to manage or distribute the asset according to the trust’s terms, removing obstacles such as clear title problems or resistance from third parties. This judicial recognition helps avoid full probate and aligns asset distribution with the settlor’s estate plan.
Filing a Heggstad petition requires gathering the trust document, any relevant deeds or account statements, affidavits or declarations from witnesses familiar with the decedent’s intent, and a clear legal argument showing why the property should be treated as trust property. The petitioner must prepare a proposed order for the court, serve interested parties, and be ready to respond to objections. The court may set a hearing and evaluate the credibility of the evidence presented. Proper preparation and attention to procedural requirements, including notices and correct pleadings, are essential for a favorable outcome.
Understanding common terms related to trust disputes and Heggstad petitions helps petitioners and trustees navigate the process. Definitions clarify what is meant by settlor, trustee, beneficiary, trust funding, and related court remedies. This section provides concise explanations of terms you may encounter in filings or court hearings, helping you interpret documents and follow legal procedures. Familiarity with these concepts supports better communication with counsel and informed decision-making when preparing evidence, serving notices, and presenting the petition to the probate court in Kern County or elsewhere in California.
A settlor is the person who creates a trust and whose property is intended to be managed and distributed under the trust’s terms. The settlor’s written trust agreement typically sets out instructions for asset distribution, trustee powers, and successor beneficiaries. In Heggstad matters, demonstrating the settlor’s intent that certain assets be included in the trust is central. Evidence of intent may include the trust document itself, transfer instruments, contemporaneous notes, or actions taken by the settlor and trustee. The court looks to that intent to determine whether an asset should be treated as trust property despite its title at death.
Trust funding refers to the process of transferring assets into a trust so the trustee can manage them according to the trust’s terms. Funding can involve re-titling real estate, changing account ownership, or designating the trust as beneficiary of certain assets. When funding is incomplete at the settlor’s death, disputes about ownership may arise. A Heggstad petition can request a court declaration treating the asset as trust property based on the settlor’s intent and surrounding circumstances, thereby remedying incomplete funding and allowing the trustee to continue trust administration without full probate.
A trustee is the individual or institution responsible for managing the trust assets and carrying out the trust’s terms for the benefit of the beneficiaries. Trustees have fiduciary duties to act in beneficiaries’ best interests, preserve trust property, and follow the trust’s distribution instructions. In Heggstad proceedings, trustees often file or support petitions to have assets treated as trust property so they can fulfill their management and distribution responsibilities. Courts evaluate trustee actions and evidence of the settlor’s intent when deciding whether to recognize an asset as part of the trust.
A beneficiary is a person or entity entitled to receive benefits from a trust under its terms. Beneficiaries rely on trustees to manage trust property and distribute assets according to the trust instrument. When assets remain outside a trust at death, beneficiaries may lack clear title or access to those assets, which can prompt a Heggstad petition to clarify ownership. Courts consider the settlor’s intentions and the expectations of beneficiaries and trustees when resolving whether specific property should be deemed trust property for administration and distribution.
When assets are not properly titled in a trust, families can consider a Heggstad petition, a formal probate proceeding, or other corrective instruments such as deeds or beneficiary designation updates. A Heggstad petition focuses on establishing trust ownership and can be narrower and less expensive than full probate. Probate handles comprehensive distribution of all assets in a decedent’s estate but can be more time-consuming and public. Other remedies may be appropriate when documentation is clear or parties agree. Choosing the right path depends on asset types, the clarity of intent, the presence of disputes, and the need for court intervention to confirm title.
A limited court approach such as a Heggstad petition is often sufficient when there is clear documentary or testimonial evidence that the decedent intended the asset to be part of a trust and there are few or no disputes among heirs. When trust documents, deeds, or account records demonstrate the settlor’s plan and parties are cooperative, the court can often resolve title issues quickly without comprehensive probate administration. This streamlined path reduces procedural complexity, allows trustees to manage assets under the trust terms, and helps preserve privacy for family affairs while still securing judicial recognition of the settlor’s intent.
A narrow petition may be appropriate where only a few assets remain outside the trust and their resolution will settle the primary questions about ownership. When the assets in question are limited in number and the transactions needed to place them under trust control are straightforward, a Heggstad petition can provide an efficient remedy. This approach minimizes court time and associated fees compared to full probate, enabling trustees to promptly secure title, transfer ownership into the trust, and proceed with distribution according to the trust’s terms, benefiting beneficiaries by reducing delays and additional expense.
Comprehensive legal action may be necessary when the decedent left a complex asset portfolio with mixed title forms, competing beneficiary claims, or potential creditor issues. In such situations, resolving ownership questions for multiple assets may require coordinated litigation, account reviews, and possible probate proceedings to fully protect interests and clear titles. Comprehensive representation helps identify all relevant assets, evaluate risks, and pursue an integrated strategy that may include Heggstad petitions as part of a larger plan to ensure that all estate matters are resolved consistently and in a manner that honors the decedent’s overall intent.
Where parties dispute the settlor’s intent, contest trust validity, or raise competing claims, a comprehensive legal approach is often needed to protect client interests and manage litigation risks. Contested matters can require discovery, contested hearings, and complex legal arguments that extend beyond the narrow scope of an uncontested Heggstad petition. In those cases, careful case assessment, thorough documentation, and strategic court filings are important to pursue favorable outcomes while addressing the broader estate administration or probate implications that disagreement and litigation can create.
A comprehensive approach ensures that all potential issues are evaluated, including asset identification, title concerns, creditor claims, and beneficiary rights. This holistic view helps prevent overlooked claims and unexpected complications that might arise after partial remedies. By addressing funding gaps, preparing appropriate petitions, and coordinating with trustees and beneficiaries, a broad strategy reduces the likelihood of future litigation and promotes orderly administration. It also provides clarity for property transfers and reduces uncertainty for beneficiaries who may otherwise face protracted disputes or incomplete asset transfers.
Comprehensive planning and representation can also incorporate preventative measures such as corrective deeds, trust amendments where permitted, or coordination with financial institutions to update account ownership designations. In complex estates, these measures combined with targeted court filings like Heggstad petitions create a durable resolution that aligns property titles with the settlor’s intentions. The result is smoother administration, reduced administrative burden on trustees, and greater assurance that assets will be distributed according to the trust terms without unnecessary delay or expense.
One significant benefit of a comprehensive approach is achieving clear title to property so trustees can manage and distribute assets without impediments. A court order recognizing trust ownership or properly executed corrective documents can remove title clouds and allow trustees to effect transfers, sell real estate, or handle accounts with confidence. Streamlined transfers reduce friction among beneficiaries, prevent hold-ups in administration, and often cut down on fees and delays that arise when ownership remains unsettled, helping families move forward with the practical aspects of estate settlement.
Addressing funding issues, title corrections, and potential creditor claims proactively reduces the risk of future disputes that could reopen estate matters and generate additional expense. A durable resolution backed by court orders or properly recorded documents makes it harder for late claims to disrupt distributions or challenge trustee actions. This defensive posture preserves the settlor’s intent and gives beneficiaries a clearer path to receive their trust distributions, while limiting the possibility of protracted litigation that can drain estate resources and create ongoing uncertainty for family members.
Start by collecting the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any documents showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. Witness affidavits, correspondence about asset transfers, and records of discussions with the trustee can all support a petition. Early document collection preserves evidence that may be harder to reconstruct later and helps identify whether a Heggstad petition is the right path. Providing organized documentation to counsel speeds case assessment, clarifies legal strategy, and increases the likelihood of an efficient court resolution under California procedures.
Evaluate whether corrective deeds, beneficiary designation updates, or joint filings with financial institutions could resolve the issue without going to court. In some circumstances, informal correction or administrative processes accomplish the same result more quickly. However, when title is disputed or third parties refuse to cooperate, a Heggstad petition provides a formal route to obtain a court order recognizing trust ownership. Weighing alternatives early helps determine the most efficient and cost-effective path to achieve clear title and enable trust administration in line with the decedent’s wishes.
You should consider a Heggstad petition when assets that should have been transferred into a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name, creating obstacles to trust administration. The petition can save time and expense by avoiding a full probate process, provide clear court recognition of trust ownership, and enable trustees to manage and distribute assets without further delay. It is also appropriate when title issues prevent the sale or transfer of real property, or when financial institutions require a court order to accept the trustee’s authority. Consulting with counsel helps determine whether this remedy fits your situation.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad petition is to resolve ambiguity about the settlor’s intent where documentation of funding is incomplete or inconsistent. The petition provides a judicial remedy that aligns asset ownership with the trust terms based on the strongest available evidence. Families facing creditor claims, competing beneficiaries, or unclear account titling may benefit from the certainty a court order provides. This process supports orderly management and distribution of trust assets while reducing the likelihood of later disputes that could disrupt the settlor’s estate plan.
Typical circumstances prompting a Heggstad petition include when a decedent created a living trust but died before re-titling real estate or accounts, when a deed was prepared but not recorded, or when beneficiary designations conflict with trust terms. Other scenarios involve home equity or retirement accounts that were overlooked, transfers that were attempted but incomplete, or creditor issues that require legal clarification of ownership. These situations create practical obstacles to trust administration and distribution that a Heggstad petition can often resolve by establishing the settlor’s intent and treating the property as trust assets.
Real property often remains titled in a decedent’s individual name despite a trust provision intended to include the property, creating title issues for trustees and beneficiaries. When deeds were not executed or recorded in time, the trustee may lack the authority to sell or transfer the property. Filing a Heggstad petition can provide a court order recognizing the property as part of the trust based on evidence of the settlor’s intent. This remedy helps clear title, enables trust administration, and prevents a potentially lengthy probate process simply to correct record ownership.
Bank and investment accounts sometimes remain in the decedent’s name due to oversight, missing paperwork, or misunderstandings about the funding process. If accounts were intended to be trust property but lack proper titling or beneficiary designations, access and management become problematic for trustees. A Heggstad petition can ask the court to declare those accounts trust property, enabling the trustee to access funds for estate needs and distributions. Clear documentation and bank records are important to show the decedent’s intent and support the petition in court.
Deeds or transfer documents that were drafted but not recorded, or transfers that were interrupted before completion, can leave real property outside the trust when the settlor dies. In such cases, the trust’s purpose is frustrated by technical defects in title. A Heggstad petition can be used to remedy these defects by presenting evidence of the settlor’s intent and the surrounding circumstances that show the property was meant to be part of the trust. Resolving these issues through the court can prevent prolonged disputes and streamline administration.
We assist families and trustees in China Lake Acres and surrounding areas with petitions that seek to treat property as trust assets under California law. Our office provides practical guidance on documenting intent, preparing court filings, and coordinating with courts and title companies to resolve ownership issues. Whether the matter involves a single account, a residence, or multiple assets, we help clients evaluate options and pursue the action most likely to secure clear title and enable trust administration. Timely action and careful preparation can make the process smoother for trustees and beneficiaries.
Clients choose our firm for focused estate planning representation and courtroom experience in resolving trust funding disputes. We prioritize clear communication, careful document review, and strategic filings to present strong, persuasive petitions that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. Our approach emphasizes practical resolution, minimizing unnecessary litigation while ensuring legal rights are protected. For families facing title uncertainty or incomplete trust funding, our team provides guidance on the documentary and procedural steps that support a successful court determination recognizing trust ownership.
We work closely with trustees, beneficiaries, and third parties such as title companies to coordinate corrective measures and court filings needed to resolve ownership disputes. This collaborative approach helps identify potential problems early, compile the evidence required by the court, and reduce friction during administration. By focusing on a clear plan and timely filings, we aim to secure orders that allow trustees to move forward with managing and distributing trust assets consistent with the settlor’s wishes, while limiting delays and costs for estate stakeholders.
Our firm also provides assistance with related estate planning documents and services, including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, health care directives, and other instruments that support comprehensive trust administration. Addressing these broader planning needs alongside any Heggstad petition helps ensure that future assets are properly titled and that administration proceeds smoothly. We help clients create or update documents to prevent similar issues from occurring and to maintain continuity in trust management for successive generations.
Our process begins with a careful review of your trust documents, title records, and any attempted transfers to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We then advise on evidence collection, draft the petition and legal declarations, and serve notice to interested parties as required by California probate procedures. If necessary, we represent clients at hearings and negotiate with other parties or institutions to achieve an efficient resolution. Throughout, we focus on accuracy in pleadings and clear presentation of intent to the court to increase the likelihood of a favorable ruling.
We start by collecting and reviewing the trust, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any relevant correspondence or affidavits showing the decedent’s intent. This step includes interviewing trustees and beneficiaries to understand actions taken before death and to identify witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intentions. Thorough document gathering allows us to assess whether the Heggstad route is appropriate or if alternative remedies may be more effective. A strong evidentiary foundation is essential for a convincing petition and efficient court resolution.
We examine the trust language and any evidence that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust, including drafts, signed deeds, or correspondence. Understanding whether transfers were attempted and where they stalled helps tailor the petition and supporting declarations. This review clarifies legal issues and identifies the most persuasive evidence to present to the court. Documenting the chronology of events and recording attempts to fund the trust provides the narrative the court needs to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property.
Part of initial preparation is identifying beneficiaries, heirs, creditors, and other interested parties who must receive notice or might object to the petition. Anticipating objections allows us to gather targeted evidence and prepare legal responses. We also coordinate service of process and ensure filing requirements are met under California probate rules. Early attention to interested parties helps reduce procedural delays and positions the petition to proceed efficiently through the court docket while protecting clients from surprise challenges during the hearing phase.
After preparation, we file the Heggstad petition with the appropriate probate court and serve all required notices. The filing outlines the legal basis for treating the asset as trust property and attaches supporting declarations, exhibits, and a proposed order. Courts review the submission and may schedule a hearing to receive testimony or additional evidence. Properly drafted pleadings and complete supporting documentation are important to persuade the court to grant the requested relief and to minimize the time and resources spent on additional litigation matters.
We draft declarations from trustees, witnesses, or others with firsthand knowledge of the settlor’s intent, and assemble documentary evidence such as deeds, account statements, and correspondence. These materials establish a clear factual record for the court to evaluate. Witness declarations often explain the settlor’s intent, completed transfer attempts, and actions by the trustee and beneficiaries. Careful assembly of evidence increases the petition’s chance of success and helps the court reach a reasoned decision that aligns asset ownership with the trust’s terms.
We handle service of the petition and supporting documents on all required parties, including beneficiaries, heirs, and known creditors. Proper service under California rules is a procedural requirement and a strategic step to limit surprises. If responses or objections are filed, we prepare timely legal replies and, when appropriate, attempt to resolve disputes through discussion or targeted motions. Addressing potential objections promptly and constructively helps keep the matter focused on resolving title and trust administration issues efficiently.
If the court schedules a hearing, we present the petition, supporting declarations, and evidence necessary to demonstrate the settlor’s intent and request an order treating the property as trust-owned. Following a favorable order, we assist in recording necessary documents, coordinating with title companies, and completing account transfers so the trustee can manage and distribute assets. If the court denies the petition, we advise on next steps, which may include pursuing alternative remedies, amending filings, or addressing evidentiary gaps to pursue relief through other means.
At the hearing, a clear presentation of the trust document, transfer history, and witness declarations helps the court evaluate the merits of the petition. We focus on demonstrating the settlor’s consistent intent and any actions showing attempts to fund the trust. Proper courtroom preparation, including organizing exhibits and anticipating questions, supports an orderly hearing. Successful presentation leads to an order that clarifies ownership and enables trustees to proceed with administration according to the trust’s terms.
After obtaining a court order, we assist with recording the order where necessary, preparing corrective deeds, and coordinating with title companies and financial institutions to effect the transfer of assets into the trust. These implementation steps ensure that the trustee has clear authority to manage or distribute the property. We also advise on updating estate planning documents and ownership designations to prevent future funding gaps, helping families create a more resilient arrangement for trust administration going forward.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks the court to treat certain property as if it had been transferred into a trust during the settlor’s lifetime, even though title remained in the settlor’s name at death. The petition typically presents the trust instrument, evidence of attempted transfers, and declarations supporting the settlor’s intent. Courts use this procedure to address funding defects and to clarify ownership so trustees can manage and distribute assets according to the trust. This remedy is used when documentation or conduct suggests the decedent intended the asset to be trust property but legal title was left in the decedent’s name. It is a targeted approach that can avoid full probate for specific assets, though each situation depends on the available evidence and the court’s evaluation of intent and surrounding circumstances.
Proving intent typically requires a combination of documentary evidence and witness declarations showing the settlor’s plan to fund the trust. Helpful documents include the trust agreement, drafts, recorded or unrecorded deeds, account statements, correspondence about transfers, and any paperwork indicating attempted re-titling. Affidavits from trustees, family members, or professionals who worked with the settlor at the relevant time can corroborate intent. Courts consider the totality of circumstances rather than a single factor. Consistency in documents and behavior, efforts to retitle assets, and admissions by the settlor or trusted agents strengthen proof. Properly organized evidence improves the petition’s chances of success under California probate standards.
A Heggstad petition can avoid full probate for the particular asset(s) at issue by obtaining a court order that treats those assets as trust property, thereby enabling trust administration without comprehensive probate proceedings. However, it does not automatically resolve unrelated probate matters for other assets that are truly part of the decedent’s probate estate. The benefit is targeted relief for funding defects that would otherwise require broader probate administration. If multiple assets or disputes exist, or if beneficiaries contest matters beyond the specific assets covered by the petition, additional probate steps may still be necessary. Each case requires an assessment of whether the Heggstad remedy suffices or whether broader estate administration is unavoidable.
Notices must be served on all parties whose interests could be affected, including named beneficiaries, heirs at law, and known creditors, as required by California probate procedure. The court requires proper service to ensure due process and provide an opportunity for interested parties to respond or object. Accurate identification and service help prevent later challenges to the proceeding and ensure the court has jurisdiction to issue the requested relief. Failure to provide required notice can delay the process and potentially invalidate rulings, so careful attention to service rules, including timing and method of service, is important. Counsel can assist in preparing and executing proper service to meet court requirements and protect client interests.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the court’s docket, the complexity of the evidence, and whether any party files an objection. Uncontested petitions with clear documentation can move relatively quickly, often within a few months from filing to hearing and final order. More complex matters or contested petitions may take longer, particularly if additional discovery or evidentiary hearings are needed. Local court procedures, the need for supplemental documentation, and the involvement of third parties such as title companies can affect timing. Early preparation of strong supporting evidence and proactive communication with interested parties usually helps shorten the process where possible.
Creditors may challenge property treatment if they believe assets should be available to satisfy debts or if they question the validity of the trust or the timing of transfers. A Heggstad petition does not prevent creditors from asserting valid claims against the decedent’s estate, and the court will consider creditor rights in the context of the petition and any related probate matters. Proper notice to creditors and compliance with probate timelines helps address these issues. If creditor issues are anticipated, additional steps may be necessary to protect the trustee and beneficiaries, including addressing claims in probate or negotiating resolutions. Early identification of potential creditor claims and timely legal response reduce the risk of surprises and facilitate a more orderly resolution.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the petitioning party and counsel will evaluate the reasons for denial and consider alternative remedies. This may include gathering additional or stronger evidence, pursuing corrective deeds or administrative transfers where possible, or moving forward with probate administration for the affected assets. Denial does not always end the matter; it may identify evidentiary gaps that can be addressed in a supplemental filing. In contested situations, parties may reassess settlement options or consider other legal avenues to resolve ownership disputes. Careful analysis of the court’s rationale guides decisions about next steps, timing, and whether further litigation or negotiation is advisable to protect beneficiaries’ interests.
Sometimes title defects can be corrected through recording corrective deeds, affidavits, or working with financial institutions to retitle accounts without court involvement when all parties agree and documentation is clear. However, when parties disagree, title companies refuse to accept documents, or the evidence of intent is insufficient for administrative correction, a court order obtained through a Heggstad petition can provide the needed authority to change title and resolve disputes. When in doubt, evaluating the strength of documentary evidence and the willingness of third parties to cooperate helps determine whether to pursue administrative correction or file a petition. Legal guidance ensures appropriate steps are taken to clear title and align ownership with trust terms.
Heggstad petitions are a recognized remedy in California probate practice and are filed where circumstances indicate incomplete trust funding left assets outside a trust. Kern County courts handle these matters according to state law and local procedures, and outcomes depend on the strength of the evidence and the clarity of the settlor’s intent. Local court calendars and practices may affect scheduling and how hearings are conducted, so local knowledge can help navigate the process efficiently. While not all estate disputes require a Heggstad petition, the remedy is commonly used where title problems block trust administration of real property or accounts. Early assessment of evidence and careful preparation tailored to local rules increase the odds of a favorable resolution in Kern County.
To prepare for a Heggstad petition involving real property, gather the trust document, any deeds or transfer drafts, mortgage statements, and records of discussions or actions showing the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust. Witness declarations from those who observed the settlor’s intent or assisted with transfer attempts are often helpful. Clear, chronological documentation of transfer attempts strengthens the petition’s case at hearing. Additionally, contact local title companies to learn what evidence they require for transfer and identify any potential title issues in advance. Early coordination with counsel, title officers, and trustees reduces delays and helps craft a petition that addresses the court’s evidentiary needs to obtain a clear order recognizing the property as trust-owned.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas