A Heggstad Petition can be an essential legal tool for transferring assets into a decedent’s trust when formal transfer documents were not completed during life. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, our team serves clients in Frazier Park and throughout Kern County, helping families understand whether a Heggstad Petition is appropriate for their situation. This introduction explains the petition’s purpose, common situations that prompt its use, and how it interacts with a decedent’s estate plan. We focus on clear communication, practical next steps, and close collaboration with beneficiaries and trustees to pursue a favorable result efficiently and respectfully.
When a person created a living trust but failed to retitle bank accounts, real estate, or other assets into the trust before passing, beneficiaries and trustees often need a legal procedure to correct the record. A Heggstad Petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain property belonged to the trust at the decedent’s death even though formal transfer steps were unfinished. This process can avoid full probate for some assets and speed administration, but it requires careful documentation and legal argument. We guide clients through preparing factual evidence, presenting deeds or account statements, and pursuing a timely hearing to resolve ownership questions.
Filing a Heggstad Petition can preserve the intent of the decedent and keep assets aligned with the trust’s distribution plan, which benefits trustees and beneficiaries by reducing delays and uncertainties. The petition helps correct oversights like omitted deeds or accounts that were never retitled, supporting a smoother trust administration. When accepted, a Heggstad Petition can prevent unnecessary probate, protect privacy, and allow trustees to manage or distribute assets without extended court involvement. It also clarifies title for third parties such as financial institutions, ensuring that beneficiary transfers and trustee actions can proceed in accordance with the trust documents.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in San Jose provides estate planning and trust administration services across California, including Frazier Park. Our firm assists clients with wills, trusts, powers of attorney, health care directives, and petitions like Heggstad filings. We combine practical legal knowledge with personalized service to help trustees and families navigate sensitive transitions. Our attorneys work closely with clients to review trust documents, gather supporting evidence, and prepare clear, court-ready filings that explain why property should be treated as trust assets. We prioritize communication, responsiveness, and realistic options tailored to each client’s circumstances.
A Heggstad Petition is a legal request to the probate court asking it to determine that certain assets should be administered as part of a trust despite not being formally transferred during the decedent’s life. Courts consider the decedent’s intent, surrounding facts, and documentary evidence to decide whether ownership effectively belonged to the trust. The process requires a written petition, supporting declarations, and often a hearing where the trustee or petitioner explains the circumstances. Trustees must assemble records such as trust instruments, account statements, deeds, and communications that show the decedent intended the property to be in the trust.
The success of a Heggstad Petition depends on how convincingly the petitioner can show the decedent’s intent and the relationship between the asset and the trust. Evidence can include signed trust documents, beneficiary designations consistent with the trust, correspondence discussing the trust, or actions the decedent took toward funding the trust. Courts may evaluate whether the omission was clerical or a substantive failure to fund. While a petition can resolve title questions without full probate, it still involves legal filings, notices to interested parties, and time for court review, so timely consultation and document preparation are important.
A Heggstad Petition seeks a judicial declaration that a particular asset should be treated as trust property despite not having been formally re-titled into the trust. This remedy is commonly used when a decedent executed a revocable living trust but failed to retitle property, or when a successor trustee needs clarity to transfer or manage assets. The petition asks the court to consider the decedent’s actions and intent and to declare that the asset was effectively part of the trust at death. Properly prepared petitions rely on thorough documentation and clear narrative explaining why the court should enforce the trust’s terms.
A successful Heggstad Petition typically includes a clear factual statement of the decedent’s intent, copies of the trust and related documents, proof of ownership, and any communications that reflect intent to fund the trust. The petition must identify interested parties and provide notice, include declarations from the trustee or witnesses, and reference legal authority supporting the requested relief. After filing, courts may schedule a hearing and consider objections. The process demands attention to deadlines, proper service of documents, and tailored legal argument to align facts with governing probate and trust law.
Understanding the terminology used in trust administration and Heggstad proceedings helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the process and make informed decisions. This section defines commonly used terms such as funding, retitling, successor trustee, probate estate, and constructive trust. Each definition is presented in practical language and tied to how it matters in preparing or responding to a Heggstad Petition. Clear definitions assist clients in gathering the correct documents, understanding court filings, and communicating with institutions like banks and title companies.
Funding the trust refers to the act of transferring ownership of assets from an individual to the trust, often by retitling bank accounts, real property deeds, and investment accounts in the name of the trustee for the benefit of the trust. When funding is incomplete, a Heggstad Petition may be necessary to have the court recognize that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Proper funding simplifies administration, avoids probate for funded assets, and aligns legal title with the trust’s instructions for distribution and management after death.
A successor trustee is the person or entity named in a trust document to take over management and distribution of trust assets after the original trustee or grantor becomes incapacitated or dies. The successor trustee is responsible for administering trust property according to the terms of the trust and may need to file a Heggstad Petition when assets were not properly transferred. That trustee must gather documentation, notify beneficiaries, and take reasonable steps to protect trust assets while seeking any court determinations necessary to resolve title issues.
A constructive trust is a legal remedy imposed by a court to prevent unjust enrichment when someone wrongfully holds property that should belong to another. In the context of Heggstad Petitions, courts sometimes consider concepts similar to a constructive trust when deciding whether assets should be treated as belonging to a decedent’s trust, especially if the decedent took steps indicating an intent to fund the trust. The court’s aim is to align ownership with the decedent’s intent and to prevent a party from retaining property contrary to that intent.
The probate estate includes assets owned solely in the decedent’s name that require court supervision to be transferred to heirs or beneficiaries under a will or state intestacy rules. When assets intended for a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name, those assets may become part of the probate estate unless a Heggstad Petition or other remedy is used to show they belonged to the trust. Avoiding probate for trust assets preserves privacy and can speed distribution, but legal steps are often needed to align title with the trust documentation.
When property was not transferred into a trust, trustees and beneficiaries have several potential remedies, including filing a Heggstad Petition, initiating probate, or negotiating with title holders or financial institutions to transfer assets voluntarily. Each option has trade-offs in terms of time, cost, and formality. A Heggstad Petition aims to mirror the decedent’s intent and can avoid full probate, but it requires court approval and evidence. Probate may be necessary in some cases, particularly if ownership is disputed or there are competing claims. A tailored assessment helps determine the most appropriate route.
A limited approach can work when the omission of an asset from trust funding is narrowly confined and the decedent’s intent is clearly documented. Examples include bank accounts or accounts with beneficiary designations that match the trust, or deeds prepared but not recorded. In those cases, trustees may be able to obtain transfers from institutions with minimal court involvement by presenting the trust document, death certificate, and related records. This route reduces expense and delay when third parties accept the presented evidence and agree to retitle assets to the trust.
A limited approach is often viable when heirs, beneficiaries, and institutions agree about the intended ownership and there are no competing claims. If all interested parties cooperate, trustees can sometimes complete transfers through administrative steps or quiet title procedures without fully engaging the probate process. However, cooperation must be documented and any transfers completed with careful attention to legal requirements to avoid future disputes. When questions arise or third parties decline to act, court intervention via a Heggstad Petition may become necessary.
Comprehensive legal support is often needed when there are competing claims to assets, ambiguous trust language, or evidence that could be interpreted in different ways. In such situations, the trustee may need to file a Heggstad Petition to resolve title issues beyond administrative transfer capabilities. Comprehensive representation includes preparing detailed evidence, coordinating service and notice to interested parties, advocating at hearings, and addressing objections. Thorough preparation helps present a persuasive legal and factual case to the court, reducing the risk of delays or unfavorable rulings.
A comprehensive approach is warranted when assets are complex — such as real property in multiple jurisdictions, retirement plans, or accounts with restrictive transfer rules — or when banks and title companies refuse to accept the trust document without a court order. In these cases, preparing and pursuing a Heggstad Petition may be the most reliable path to establish trust ownership. Full-service representation guides trustees through evidence collection, legal briefing, and court hearings, ensuring that procedural requirements and deadlines are met while protecting beneficiaries’ rights.
A comprehensive legal approach reduces the risk of future disputes by creating a detailed record that supports the trustee’s claims and the decedent’s intent. It gives the court a clear factual and legal basis for declaring assets part of the trust, which strengthens the trustee’s authority to manage and distribute those assets. This approach also anticipates potential objections and addresses procedural hurdles proactively, helping to avoid multiple filings or supplemental hearings that can increase cost and delay for beneficiaries and trustees.
Thorough preparation and representation also reassure financial institutions, title companies, and county recorder offices when evidence is presented in a court-validated context. A comprehensive strategy can include working with appraisers, accountants, and title professionals to assemble convincing documentation, as well as clear communication with beneficiaries to prevent misunderstandings. Ultimately, a careful, well-documented process helps protect family relationships and ensures that distributions follow the decedent’s wishes to the extent permitted by the trust and applicable law.
One major benefit of a comprehensive approach is achieving a court-backed determination of title, which eliminates uncertainty for the trustee and beneficiaries. With an order recognizing assets as trust property, trustees can confidently manage, sell, or transfer assets in accordance with the trust terms. This formal recognition reduces the likelihood that third parties will later challenge transfers, and it simplifies transactions such as property sales or account closures by providing definitive legal authority for trustee actions.
A comprehensive legal approach helps prevent future litigation by addressing potential disputes up front and documenting the decedent’s intent in a manner the court can rely upon. By resolving title questions early in the administration process, trustees reduce the risk of protracted contests that can drain estate assets and delay distributions. This approach promotes efficient administration and provides beneficiaries with clearer expectations about timing, distribution, and the ultimate disposition of trust property.
Collecting all relevant documents as soon as possible will strengthen any petition and shorten the time needed for court review. Assemble the trust document, any drafts or amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, signed correspondence indicating funding intent, and the decedent’s death certificate. Include records of attempted transfers, bank communications, and any prepared but unrecorded transfer instruments. Early organization helps counsel evaluate whether a Heggstad Petition is appropriate and prepares a persuasive factual narrative for the court while avoiding delays associated with tracking down older records.
A well-prepared petition requires a clear, organized record that ties the decedent’s actions and documents to the trust’s terms. Work with legal counsel to draft declarations, compile supporting exhibits, and anticipate questions the court may raise. Attention to detail in evidentiary support — such as matching account numbers, consistent beneficiary designations, and corroborating witness statements — can make the difference in a contested hearing. Professional assistance ensures procedural requirements are met and strengthens the presentation of facts and legal authority in court filings.
You should consider a Heggstad Petition when a decedent clearly intended assets to be held in a trust but title remains in the decedent’s name, creating obstacles for the successor trustee. Common situations include real property with unrecorded deeds, bank or investment accounts not retitled, or documents that demonstrate intent but lack final transfer. A petition can clarify ownership, reduce probate exposure, and allow trustees to administer assets according to the trust. Early legal assessment will identify whether a petition is the most efficient remedy given the facts and potential objections.
Consider a petition if third parties refuse to recognize the trust without a court order, or if beneficiaries and heirs disagree about asset ownership. When institutions require formal judicial recognition to release funds or transfer property, a Heggstad Petition becomes a practical mechanism to obtain that authorization. Similarly, when the trust contains instructions that must be carried out but title issues impede action, a court determination ensures trustee authority to distribute or manage assets. Seeking legal guidance helps weigh the costs and benefits relative to alternatives like probate or private settlement.
Typical circumstances include situations where a revocable living trust was executed but assets were not retitled, deeds were prepared and signed but not recorded, beneficiary designations conflict with trust provisions, or financial institutions require a court order to process transfers. Other triggers include real property purchased with trust funds but left in the decedent’s name, and accounts with ambiguous ownership documentation. In each case, the common thread is evidence pointing to the decedent’s intent to use the trust while formal legal title does not reflect that intention.
Real property intended to be trust property often gives rise to petitions when deeds were prepared but not recorded or when the name on title was never changed. Trustees facing this circumstance should locate deeds, purchase records, escrow instructions, and any correspondence that shows the decedent’s intent to place the property in the trust. Establishing a chain of evidence demonstrating intent and partial actions toward transferring title can support a petition seeking a judicial declaration that the property belonged to the trust at death.
Accounts that were never retitled can create administrative bottlenecks and risk requiring probate. Gathering statements, beneficiary designation forms, correspondence with the financial institution, and evidence that the account was meant to be governed by the trust will support a petition. Trustees should also verify whether payable-on-death or transfer-on-death designations exist, as those can affect whether probate is necessary. Presenting a clear record of intent and ownership history strengthens a trustee’s position before the court.
Conflicts between beneficiary designations and trust provisions can lead to disputes that require judicial resolution. If beneficiary forms name individuals who differ from the trust’s instructions, or if forms are incomplete or outdated, a Heggstad Petition can help reconcile those discrepancies by showing the decedent’s intent to include assets in the trust. Trustees must compile documents reflecting the trust’s terms, any relevant beneficiary forms, and supporting evidence of intent so the court can reconcile conflicts and determine the appropriate ownership and distribution path.
Residents of Frazier Park and nearby Kern County communities can rely on counsel based in San Jose who regularly handles trust administration matters across California. We provide practical guidance for successor trustees and beneficiaries confronting incomplete funding or title-related obstacles. From initial case evaluation and document gathering through filing a petition and representing the trustee at hearings, our goal is to deliver timely legal options tailored to local courts and institutions. We help clients understand likely outcomes, costs, and necessary steps while working to resolve ownership issues efficiently and respectfully.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because we focus on clear communication, careful preparation, and practical solutions for trust administration challenges. We help trustees and families gather necessary documents, evaluate the strength of a potential petition, and map out a strategic approach suited to each case. Our representation includes preparing declarations and exhibits, ensuring proper notice to interested parties, and advocating for the petition at court hearings when necessary. We prioritize efficient process management to reduce delays and costs for clients.
We assist in coordinating with title companies, banks, and other third parties to present a persuasive record that supports the trustee’s request to have assets treated as trust property. Our team educates clients on applicable legal standards and anticipated timelines while handling procedural requirements and court filings. By taking a methodical approach to evidence and legal argument, we help trustees pursue the most appropriate legal pathway, whether that is a negotiated transfer or a formal Heggstad Petition, always keeping beneficiaries informed throughout the process.
Throughout the engagement, our firm emphasizes respectful, straightforward interactions with beneficiaries and heirs to minimize conflict and reach timely resolutions. We provide regular updates, explain options for settlement or litigation avoidance, and prepare clients for hearings when court involvement is necessary. Our aim is to ensure that the decedent’s intent is honored and that trustees have the legal authority needed to administer the trust effectively, while protecting the interests of beneficiaries and responding to third-party requirements.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust documents, asset records, and any actions the decedent took toward funding the trust. We then advise on evidence to collect and draft a petition and supporting declarations tailored to the facts. After filing, we ensure proper notice to interested parties, respond to requests for additional information, and appear at scheduled hearings to present the case. We maintain clear communication throughout, update trustees on progress, and coordinate with third parties as needed to achieve a timely and effective resolution.
The first step is a thorough assessment of the trust, decedent’s records, and the specific assets in question. We identify any documentation gaps and advise trustees on what evidence to gather, including deeds, statements, correspondence, and declarations from witnesses. This stage establishes whether a Heggstad Petition is likely to succeed and helps in crafting a targeted legal strategy. Early organization of documents streamlines petition drafting and strengthens the factual narrative needed to persuade the court.
We carefully review the trust instrument, amendments, and any related estate planning documents to understand the decedent’s intentions and the trustee’s powers. We compare those documents with asset records to determine which items were not properly titled. This review enables us to identify mismatches between legal ownership and trust instructions and to plan the evidence needed for a petition. Clear analysis at this stage reduces uncertainty and helps prioritize which assets require immediate attention.
Identifying people who can corroborate the decedent’s intent or the circumstances around funding is important in building a persuasive case. We help clients identify potential witnesses, draft witness declarations, and gather written communications or contemporaneous notes that support the trust funding claim. Strong, corroborative evidence improves the likelihood that the court will accept the petition without unnecessary delay or contested hearings.
In step two, we prepare the formal petition and all supporting documents, ensuring they comply with local court rules and evidentiary standards. This includes attaching the trust instrument, declarations, exhibits demonstrating ownership or intent, and a proposed order for the court’s consideration. We also prepare and coordinate the required service of documents to interested parties and file the petition with the appropriate probate calendar. Precise drafting and adherence to procedural requirements are key to avoiding continuances or objections that delay resolution.
Supporting declarations explain the factual basis for the petition and link documentary exhibits to the legal claim. We craft declarations that clearly tell the story of how the decedent intended the asset to be trust property and why record title does not reflect that intent. Exhibits may include deeds, bank statements, beneficiary forms, and correspondence. Together, these documents enable the court to evaluate the petition and make an informed decision about whether to recognize the asset as part of the trust.
After preparing the petition, we file it with the probate court and ensure all interested parties receive proper notice, as required by law. Proper service is essential to give parties an opportunity to respond and to satisfy procedural requirements for court consideration. We track deadlines, prepare proof of service, and respond to any preliminary inquiries from the court or opposing parties. This organized approach helps move the matter forward toward a hearing and potential judicial determination.
The final step involves presenting the petition at a court hearing where the judge evaluates the evidence and any objections. We prepare the trustee and witnesses, present the factual record, and address legal questions to support the requested declaration. If the court grants the petition, an order will be entered recognizing the asset as trust property, enabling trustees to act in accordance with the trust. When objections arise, we advocate for resolution through briefing, negotiation, or by presenting additional evidence as needed.
At the hearing, we present declarations, documentary exhibits, and witness testimony as appropriate to demonstrate the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. We also respond to any objections raised by heirs or third parties, clarifying factual disputes and legal principles for the court. Our courtroom preparation helps ensure that the judge receives a cohesive narrative and the evidence necessary to reach a determination that reflects the trust’s terms and the decedent’s intent.
If the court grants the petition, it will enter an order recognizing the asset as part of the trust, which trustees can use to complete transfers, sell property, or otherwise administer the asset according to the trust terms. We assist in implementing the court order by coordinating with title companies, financial institutions, and county recorder offices to ensure the order is properly recorded and effected. This final phase brings clarity and allows trustees to proceed with administration and distribution.
A Heggstad Petition is a request to the probate court to recognize that certain property should be treated as belonging to a decedent’s trust despite not being formally retitled before death. It helps by aligning legal title with the trust’s terms so trustees can manage or distribute assets according to the decedent’s intentions. The petition requires factual evidence showing that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust and that any omission to retitle was accidental or administrative in nature. This process can reduce the need for full probate for those specific assets and provides the trustee with a court order to present to banks, title companies, or other third parties. Preparation typically involves gathering trust documents, account statements, deeds, and witness declarations to build a coherent factual narrative that demonstrates the decedent’s intent and supports the requested court determination.
A trustee should consider a Heggstad Petition when assets intended for a trust were not retitled and third parties, heirs, or institutions are unwilling to transfer those assets without a court determination. The petition can offer a targeted remedy that addresses title issues for specific assets, potentially avoiding the time and expense of a full probate administration for those items. Trustees should evaluate the strength of documentary evidence and the likelihood of objections before choosing this route. If ownership is disputed or the institution holding the asset insists on a court order, a Heggstad Petition may be the most practical path to secure authority to manage or distribute the property. Early legal guidance helps identify the most efficient option, balancing potential costs with the benefits of a court-backed resolution and considering negotiations with interested parties as an alternative when feasible.
Evidence to support a Heggstad Petition commonly includes the trust document and any amendments, deeds or account statements showing ownership, signed but unrecorded transfer instruments, and beneficiary designations consistent with the trust. Correspondence, notes, or emails where the decedent expressed intent to place assets in the trust can provide valuable context. Declarations from the successor trustee or witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s intent are often included to corroborate documentary evidence. The court will assess whether the totality of the evidence demonstrates a clear connection between the asset and the trust. Strong, organized documentation that ties the decedent’s actions and statements to the trust’s terms improves the likelihood that the petition will be granted. Working with counsel to prepare declarations and exhibits ensures that the evidence is presented persuasively and in compliance with court rules.
The timeline for resolving a Heggstad Petition varies depending on the court’s calendar, whether interested parties object, and how quickly evidence can be gathered and served. In uncontested cases with complete documentation, a petition may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months, though some courts take longer depending on workload and procedural requirements. Contested matters typically take longer because of briefing, additional discovery, or scheduling of hearings. Courts require notice to interested parties, and objections can lead to continuances or additional hearings, extending the timeline. Early preparation, clear documentation, and efforts to resolve disputes outside of court when possible can shorten the process. Counsel can provide a more specific timeline based on the local court’s practices and the specifics of the case.
A Heggstad Petition can avoid probate for the assets it successfully places into the trust, but it does not necessarily prevent probate for other assets that remain solely in the decedent’s name. When the petition results in a court order recognizing specific property as trust property, those assets can be administered under the trust rather than through probate. However, if evidence is insufficient or objections prevail, the asset may instead require probate administration or other remedies. It is important to evaluate each asset individually and pursue a coherent strategy for the estate as a whole. Trustees should consider whether a petition will be cost-effective relative to alternatives and whether the evidence is likely to persuade the court to issue the requested order. Legal counsel can help estimate chances of success and advise on potential outcomes for each asset.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties can oppose a Heggstad Petition by filing objections with the court, asserting that the asset was not intended for the trust or that other legal rights apply. When objections are filed, the court may schedule additional hearings, require further evidence, or permit limited discovery. The trustee and petitioner then must respond to objections with documentary evidence and witness testimony to support the petition’s factual assertions. Objections can lengthen the process and increase costs, but they also provide an opportunity to clarify factual disputes in a judicial setting. Where possible, addressing concerns through negotiation or mediation before litigation reduces delays. If opposition persists, a well-documented petition and thorough preparation for hearings increase the likelihood of a favorable determination despite objections.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad Petition include negotiating voluntary transfers with financial institutions or title companies, pursuing quiet title actions when necessary, or, in some cases, initiating a full probate administration. If all interested parties agree, trustees may be able to obtain transfers by presenting the trust and other supporting documents directly to institutions. Cooperation among heirs and account holders can sometimes resolve title issues without court involvement. However, when institutions refuse to act or disputes exist, voluntary transfers may not be possible, making a Heggstad Petition or probate necessary. Choosing the best path depends on the asset type, the strength of evidence, and whether there are contested claims. Legal counsel can help weigh these options and recommend the most efficient and reliable route for accomplishing the trust’s objectives.
Costs for filing a Heggstad Petition vary based on the complexity of the facts, the amount of evidence to gather, local court fees, and whether the matter is contested. Uncontested petitions with straightforward documentation tend to be less expensive, while contested matters or those requiring extensive evidence gathering and hearings will incur higher fees. Counsel can provide an estimate after an initial review of the trust documents and assets involved. It is also important to consider the comparative cost of alternatives, such as probate administration or negotiating transfers. Sometimes the cost of a petition is reasonable relative to the value of the assets at issue and the benefits of avoiding probate. Discussing fee structures, anticipated expenses, and potential cost-saving strategies with counsel early on helps trustees budget for the process.
Yes, banks, title companies, and other institutions may require a court order or further legal documentation before transferring assets or retitling property to a trust, especially when the asset’s title does not match the trust documents or when account rules are ambiguous. Institutions often have internal policies that require judicial validation to limit their exposure to future claims. In such cases, a Heggstad Petition provides the formal court authority institutions seek to complete transfers. When an institution requests a court order, trustees should comply with procedural requirements and gather the evidence the court will need. Legal representation can streamline interactions with third parties and help prepare a petition that addresses institutional concerns, minimizing the likelihood of repeated refusals and facilitating the final transfer once the court has issued its order.
To get started, gather the trust document and any related estate planning papers, recent account and deed records for the assets in question, and any communications that show intent to fund the trust. Contact counsel to schedule an initial consultation so the documents can be reviewed and the strength of a potential Heggstad Petition assessed. During the consultation, the attorney will outline the evidence needed, potential timelines, and likely next steps for filing a petition or pursuing alternatives. Early organization of documents and prompt outreach to counsel help expedite the process and preserve important evidence, such as witness recollections or preexisting drafts. Legal counsel can advise on immediate interim steps a trustee should take to protect assets while the petition is prepared and filed and will provide guidance on notice requirements and interactions with beneficiaries and institutions.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas