If you are considering a trust modification petition in Greenfield, understanding the process and possible outcomes is essential for protecting your family’s financial plan. A trust modification petition asks a court to change the terms of an existing trust for reasons such as changed circumstances, mistakes in drafting, or the need to clarify ambiguous language. This guide explains the typical grounds for filing, what documentation is required, and how the court evaluates requests while balancing beneficiary rights and trustee duties. Knowing the practical steps ahead can reduce surprises and help you make informed decisions that preserve the original intent of the estate plan.
Trust modification matters often arise when life circumstances have shifted since the trust was created. Changes in family relationships, property ownership, tax law updates, or unforeseen events can make existing trust provisions impractical or unfair. A petition to modify seeks a judicial resolution that aligns the trust with current realities while respecting legal protections for beneficiaries. This overview outlines typical timelines, potential objections, and the kinds of evidence courts consider, including affidavits, financial records, and witness statements. Understanding these elements early helps parties prepare clear documentation and thoughtful arguments that support the requested changes.
Filing a trust modification petition can provide legal clarity and fairness when a trust no longer reflects the settlor’s intentions or practical needs. Benefits include correcting drafting errors, updating distributions to reflect changed family dynamics, resolving ambiguity that hinders asset management, and adapting trust terms to evolving tax or financial conditions. When handled properly, a court-approved modification preserves beneficiaries’ rights while enabling trustees to act with authority and confidence. Careful documentation, transparent communication with affected parties, and a well-prepared petition increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome and help avoid prolonged disputes that can erode trust assets and relationships.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning services from the San Jose office with attention to clients across California, including Greenfield residents. Our approach focuses on careful document review, clear communication, and practical solutions tailored to each family’s circumstances. We work to evaluate whether a trust modification petition is the best path or whether alternative measures like amendments, consent-based updates, or other petitions may better serve your goals. In every matter we prioritize protecting asset value, clarifying trustee authority, and minimizing conflict among beneficiaries so families can move forward with stability and confidence.
A trust modification petition is a legal request to a court to change specific terms of a trust after it has been established. Grounds for modification commonly include changed circumstances that make the original terms impractical, clerical or drafting mistakes, ambiguous provisions that require judicial interpretation, or events that frustrate the trust’s purpose. The court examines the settlor’s intent, trust language, and evidence showing why modification is necessary or appropriate. Parties often submit declarations, trust documents, and financial records to support their position, and the court will consider beneficiary rights and the potential impact on trust administration when deciding whether to grant relief.
Not every request to change a trust will succeed; modifications typically require clear justification and sometimes beneficiary consent. In some situations, a non-judicial approach such as a mutual amendment by all interested parties can resolve the issue more quickly, but when unanimity is impossible or the trust’s terms prevent amendment, a petition becomes necessary. The court process can involve notice to beneficiaries, hearings, and the submission of evidence showing changed circumstances or mistake. Understanding the potential timeline, costs, and evidentiary requirements helps clients plan and decide whether to pursue a petition or explore alternative dispute resolution options.
A trust modification petition is a formal court filing seeking alteration of an existing trust’s terms. Typically filed in the county where the trust is administered, the petition explains the legal and factual reasons for the requested changes and asks the court to issue an order approving them. Reasons can include correction of drafting errors, addressing unintended tax consequences, or adjusting distributions to reflect family changes. The process requires detailed documentation and often notice to all beneficiaries. The court’s role is to ensure modifications align with the settlor’s probable intent while protecting beneficiaries from unfair or unlawful changes.
A successful petition typically includes a clear statement of the trust’s original provisions, the specific modifications requested, and a factual basis for the change such as changed circumstances or a drafting error. Supporting evidence may include declarations, financial statements, and pertinent correspondence. The petitioner must serve notice to beneficiaries and any interested parties so they can respond or object. The court may hold hearings and weigh the settlor’s intent against current realities. The order issued will specify the modifications and any conditions, and the trustee will be responsible for implementing the court’s direction in trust administration.
Understanding common legal terms helps demystify the trust modification process. Important concepts include the settlor, who created the trust; the trustee, who manages trust assets; beneficiaries, who receive distributions; and terms like decanting, reformation, or modification, which describe different ways trusts can be altered. Knowledge of these terms clarifies roles, rights, and procedural steps. Familiarity with how courts evaluate intent, consent, and changed circumstances prepares parties to gather admissible evidence and present reasoned arguments that support a fair resolution to trust disputes or needed updates.
The settlor is the person who created and funded the trust and established its initial terms. The settlor’s stated intent, as reflected in the trust document and related writings, guides the court when evaluating requests to modify or reform the trust. Evidence such as letters, contemporaneous notes, or other planning documents can illuminate the settlor’s purpose if language in the trust is ambiguous. Courts balance preserving the settlor’s intent with adapting to circumstances that render original provisions unworkable, always seeking to honor the underlying objectives that motivated the trust’s creation.
Trust reformation is a judicial remedy that corrects mistakes in the trust document to reflect what the settlor actually intended. When clear evidence shows that the language does not match the settlor’s plan due to drafting errors or omissions, a court may reform the trust to align the document with the proven intent. This process requires convincing proof, often including written or testimonial evidence. Reformation differs from modification because it addresses errors in the written instrument rather than altering terms based on changed circumstances.
Decanting refers to the process where a trustee transfers assets from an existing trust into a new trust with different terms, when authorized by statute or the trust instrument. Decanting can accomplish changes such as modifying distribution standards, adjusting trustee powers, or fixing tax-related provisions without court action when permitted. The availability and scope of decanting depend on state law and the trust’s provisions. Trustees must act prudently, provide required notices, and document the reasons for decanting to reduce the risk of beneficiary challenges.
Beneficiary consent occurs when all interested beneficiaries agree in writing to a proposed trust change, which can sometimes avoid court intervention. When unanimous consent is possible and legally sufficient, attorneys draft consent documents that effectuate the modification while protecting the legal rights of each beneficiary. Consent must be informed, voluntary, and documented to be effective. If any beneficiary with standing objects or cannot be located, consent may not be viable and a petition to the court could be necessary to resolve the matter.
When addressing a trust that needs change, there are several legal pathways: a court petition to modify or reform, a trustee-driven decanting, or a consensual amendment by beneficiaries. A petition provides a definitive court order when parties disagree or when the trust instrument restricts nonjudicial changes. Decanting can be efficient if the trustee has legal authority and beneficiaries are unlikely to object. A consensual amendment is often the fastest and least adversarial option but requires agreement from all necessary parties. Evaluating each path involves weighing time, cost, certainty, and the likelihood of objections from beneficiaries.
A nonjudicial amendment may be appropriate when all beneficiaries who hold legal rights agree to the proposed change and the trust instrument allows such amendments. In this situation, beneficiaries can sign written consents that expressly describe the modifications, often enabling the trustee to implement the changes without court involvement. This approach is typically faster and less costly than litigation, and it helps preserve family relationships by avoiding adversarial proceedings. Documentation should be thorough, with clear statements of informed consent and provisions for recordkeeping so future disputes are less likely to arise.
When state law grants trustees decanting powers, a trustee may transfer assets to a new trust with modified terms without petitioning a court, provided the trustee meets notice and procedural requirements. Decanting is appropriate when the trust document and California law permit such transfers and when the changes benefit trust administration or beneficiaries’ interests. Trustees must document their rationale and comply strictly with statutory notice requirements to minimize the risk of later challenges. Proper drafting and transparent communication reduce uncertainty and help achieve the intended administrative or tax objectives.
Complex family dynamics or tax considerations often require a thorough legal assessment before pursuing any trust changes. When trusts involve blended families, special needs beneficiaries, or significant tax-sensitive assets, a careful review helps identify unintended consequences and design modifications that preserve long-term goals. A comprehensive approach includes evaluating the trust document, related planning instruments, and potential tax impacts, ensuring that any petition or amendment advances the settlor’s objectives while minimizing risk and protecting vulnerable beneficiaries.
When beneficiaries disagree about the proposed changes, a comprehensive legal strategy is important to manage litigation risk, negotiate potential settlements, and prepare persuasive evidence for court review. Handling disputes may involve discovery, mediation, and careful drafting of pleadings to document the basis for modification or reformation. A thoughtful process helps protect the fiduciary obligations of the trustee while addressing beneficiaries’ concerns, aiming to resolve matters efficiently and preserve estate value for intended recipients.
Taking a comprehensive approach to a trust modification petition reduces the risk of future challenges by ensuring that petitions are well-supported by facts and law. Thorough preparation includes collecting relevant documents, drafting clear proposed modifications, serving proper notice to interested parties, and anticipating possible objections. A complete strategy also considers tax and long-term administrative implications so that changes do not create unintended burdens. This level of preparation tends to save time and expense over the long run by minimizing surprises and positioning the case for a smoother court review or settlement.
A full-service approach promotes better communication among trustees, beneficiaries, and legal counsel, helping to resolve disputes before they escalate. When parties understand the rationale for changes and see supporting documentation, cooperation is more likely, and contentious hearings can often be avoided. Advanced planning for successor trustee appointments, asset reallocation, and contingency provisions reduces the potential for administrative disruption. Ultimately, a comprehensive strategy aims to protect trust assets, align administration with the settlor’s intent, and provide clear directions to trustees for implementing court-approved modifications.
Thorough preparation and well-documented reasons for modification reduce the likelihood of protracted litigation by addressing potential objections early and creating a clear evidentiary record. When petitions are supported by affidavits, financial data, and corroborating documents, courts can more readily assess the merits and issue orders that withstand later challenges. Reducing uncertainty about trustee authority and clarifying beneficiary rights through a judicial order or properly documented consents helps preserve trust assets and reduces the administrative burden on those charged with carrying out the settlor’s wishes.
A comprehensive approach aims to preserve the settlor’s original purpose by carefully aligning proposed changes with documented intent and legal standards. Whether addressing drafting mistakes, adapting to changed circumstances, or clarifying ambiguous terms, a well-supported petition helps the court understand the settlor’s objectives and order modifications that honor those goals. This reduces the risk that subsequent interpretations will deviate from what was intended and protects beneficiary expectations through explicit judicial findings or mutually agreed amendments.
Before filing a petition, collect all versions of the trust, related estate planning documents, financial records, and any correspondence that sheds light on the settlor’s intent. Detailed records can include prior wills, beneficiary designations, bank statements, deed records, and letters or notes from the settlor. Comprehensive documentation strengthens the factual basis for alleging mistake or changed circumstances and helps the court understand the full picture. Organized records also facilitate clearer communication with beneficiaries and reduce delays caused by discovery or requests for additional information.
Assess possible alternatives such as decanting, consensual amendments, or limited reformation before filing a petition, and prepare responses to likely objections. Anticipate claims related to fiduciary breach, inadequate notice, or insufficient proof of mistake and gather evidence to address those issues. Preparing for common objections reduces surprises during hearings and demonstrates to the court that the proposed change is reasonable and well-documented. Thoughtful preparation also increases the chances of resolving disputes through negotiation or settlement rather than contested litigation.
Consider a trust modification petition when the trust’s terms are inconsistent with current realities or when mistakes in drafting interfere with administration. Common reasons include significant changes in family circumstances such as marriage, divorce, births, or deaths; changes in asset ownership or tax law that affect distribution strategies; and ambiguous language that causes disputes between beneficiaries and trustees. Filing a petition can secure a court order that clarifies or adjusts the trust terms, reducing uncertainty and helping trustees manage assets according to the updated plan.
Another reason to pursue a petition is when a settlor’s intent is documented elsewhere but the trust instrument does not accurately reflect that intent due to oversight or drafting error. In such cases, reformation may correct the record and align administration with the settlor’s wishes. Additionally, when a trustee lacks statutory power to act in ways needed to manage or protect assets, a court-approved modification can expand trustee authority to meet current needs while safeguarding beneficiary interests and ensuring proper fiduciary conduct.
Common circumstances include changes in family structure, relocation of major assets, alterations in tax law that affect trust planning, or the discovery of an ambiguous or erroneous clause in the trust document. Situations such as the birth of a grandchild, a beneficiary’s disability, or the sale of a significant property can render original provisions impractical. In these cases, beneficiaries and trustees may seek either nonjudicial changes or a petition to the court to implement revisions that preserve the settlor’s broader intentions and allow for effective ongoing administration of trust assets.
Changed family circumstances such as remarriage, divorce, births, or family estrangement often prompt trust modifications. These life events can alter the fairness or practicality of original distribution provisions. Adjusting a trust to reflect a new family structure can provide equitable treatment among beneficiaries and ensure that the settlor’s intent is honored in light of current relationships. When parties cannot agree on nonjudicial amendments, a petition allows the court to evaluate the situation and issue an order that balances interests and clarifies distribution plans for the future.
Drafting errors and ambiguous language in trust documents can create confusion over intended beneficiaries, distribution timing, or trustee powers. When such defects undermine administration, a reformation petition may correct the written instrument to reflect the settlor’s actual intent. Clear proof such as contemporaneous notes, prior drafts, or consistent practices by the settlor can support reformation. Courts are mindful of protecting beneficiaries’ rights, so evidentiary standards are strict, but successful reformation brings clarity and reduces the risk of future disputes.
Shifts in tax law or the composition of the trust’s assets may make original trust terms economically inefficient or impractical. Modifications can address tax optimization, update provisions for retirement accounts, or reallocate assets to better serve beneficiary needs. When tax consequences are a concern, careful planning and court-approved changes can prevent unintended taxation or administrative burdens. Trustees and beneficiaries should consider how proposed changes will affect estate, income, and gift taxes and whether changes should be implemented by petition or alternative legal mechanisms.
Although Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman is based in San Jose, we assist clients across California, including those in Greenfield and Kern County, on trust modification matters. Our office helps clients evaluate their documents, determine whether a nonjudicial solution is viable, and prepare petitions when court approval is necessary. We understand local court procedures and can guide trustees and beneficiaries through notice requirements, filing, and hearings. Our goal is to provide clear guidance so clients can make informed choices and move forward with plans that protect family interests and estate values.
Selecting the right legal counsel for a trust modification petition means choosing a team that emphasizes careful document review, transparent communication, and practical solutions. Our firm reviews trust instruments and related estate planning documents thoroughly to identify viable legal paths, including nonjudicial options when appropriate. We assist clients in gathering supporting evidence, preparing persuasive petitions, and coordinating notice to beneficiaries. The goal is to resolve issues efficiently, limit disruption to trust administration, and achieve results that reflect the settlor’s intent and protect beneficiary interests.
We provide guidance on the procedural steps required in Kern County and other California jurisdictions, helping clients meet filing deadlines and service requirements. When disputes arise, we explore mediation and settlement opportunities before resorting to contested hearings, aiming to preserve family relationships and conserve estate resources. If litigation is necessary, we prepare thorough legal pleadings and evidentiary records to present the strongest possible case to the court, while always keeping clients informed about timeline expectations and potential outcomes.
Our firm also coordinates with financial advisors, tax professionals, and fiduciaries to ensure proposed modifications align with broader planning goals. This collaborative approach helps anticipate tax or administrative consequences and design solutions that are practical to implement. By integrating legal analysis with financial and family considerations, clients receive well-rounded recommendations that address both immediate concerns and long-term objectives for preserving assets and supporting beneficiaries.
Our process begins with a focused review of the trust and related estate planning documents, followed by fact-finding to determine the best legal path. We evaluate whether nonjudicial remedies such as beneficiary consent or decanting are feasible and discuss the pros and cons with our clients. If a petition is needed, we draft detailed pleadings, compile supporting evidence, and manage required notice to all interested parties. We prepare clients for hearings, coordinate with trustees, and follow up to ensure court orders are implemented correctly in trust administration.
The initial evaluation includes a careful review of the trust instrument, related wills, power of attorney documents, and any communications that show the settlor’s intent. We assess whether issues stem from drafting mistakes, changed circumstances, or statutory limitations on trustee powers. This stage also involves identifying all interested parties and potential obstacles to nonjudicial resolution. A comprehensive fact-gathering phase ensures the chosen strategy is tailored to the client’s goals and prepares the foundation for any petition or negotiated solution.
Gathering the full set of estate planning records, financial statements, property deeds, and correspondence is essential to build a persuasive case for modification or reformation. These documents provide evidence of the settlor’s intent and the reasons the trust should be changed. We help clients create an organized file and identify any gaps in documentation that require additional investigation or affidavits. Thorough documentation reduces surprise issues and speeds up the court’s ability to evaluate the petition.
We assess whether nonjudicial options like beneficiary consents or trustee decanting could achieve the desired change without court involvement. This includes reviewing statutory authorization, trust language, and the likelihood of beneficiary agreement. When nonjudicial routes are viable, we prepare the required forms, consent documents, and notices to implement the change efficiently. If nonjudicial methods are impractical or opposed by interested parties, we advise on the merits of pursuing a petition and prepare to litigate if necessary.
When a court petition is the appropriate course, we draft a clear, well-supported petition outlining the requested modifications, the legal basis for relief, and the facts showing why the change is necessary or appropriate. We assemble supporting evidence, including declarations and relevant financial records, and ensure proper filing with the court in the appropriate county. Proper service of notice to beneficiaries and interested parties is arranged to comply with procedural requirements, reducing the risk of delays or challenges on technical grounds.
Drafting a persuasive petition requires precise presentation of facts, legal authority, and supporting documentation. We prepare declarations from witnesses or involved parties, include relevant financial exhibits, and organize the evidentiary record to demonstrate the need for modification. A clear narrative that ties the requested changes to the settlor’s intent and present circumstances helps the court evaluate the petition efficiently. Thorough pleadings reduce the likelihood of requests for supplemental filings or continuances.
Serving timely and accurate notice to beneficiaries and other interested parties is a procedural necessity and an important step toward fair resolution. We handle service logistics, prepare proof of service documents, and track deadlines for responsive pleadings. If objections arise, we evaluate their legal weight and pursue negotiation or litigation strategies accordingly. Clear communication and prompt handling of responses help streamline the court process and position the case for a more predictable outcome.
After filing, the court may schedule a hearing to consider the petition and any objections. We prepare clients and witnesses for testimony, present evidence, and make legal arguments that explain why the requested modifications serve settled legal standards and the settlor’s intent. If the court grants the petition, the order will specify how trustee duties and distributions should proceed. We assist with implementing the court’s order, updating trust records, and advising trustees on steps needed to carry out the changes correctly and efficiently.
Preparing for hearings includes finalizing exhibits, organizing witness testimony, and rehearsing direct and responsive statements to ensure clarity in court. We work with clients to identify the most persuasive documents and prepare declarants to describe relevant facts in a manner that aligns with legal standards for modification or reformation. Strong preparation improves the odds of a favorable ruling and reduces the chance of surprise testimony or evidentiary objections that can complicate the hearing.
Once the court issues an order approving modifications, trustees must update trust records, make any required distributions, and follow new administrative directives precisely. We assist trustees in interpreting the order, preparing revised trust instruments or accountings, and notifying beneficiaries of the changes. Proper implementation keeps trust administration consistent with the court’s findings and reduces the likelihood of future disputes or appeals. We also advise on any follow-up filings required by the court or local rules.
A trust modification petition is a court request to change the terms of an existing trust when nonjudicial means are unavailable, impractical, or opposed by interested parties. Petitions are used to correct drafting errors, address changed circumstances that frustrate the trust’s purpose, or clarify ambiguous provisions. The court reviews the settlor’s intent, the trust language, and supporting evidence to determine whether the requested modifications are legally appropriate and consistent with the settlor’s probable wishes. The petition process involves preparing detailed pleadings, assembling documentary and testimonial evidence, and serving notice on beneficiaries and other interested parties. If objections arise, the court may hold hearings to weigh the competing positions. When a petition is granted, the court issues an order specifying how the trust should be modified and how trustees should implement the changes, ensuring administration aligns with the court’s findings.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies based on complexity, the level of opposition, and court schedules in the relevant county. Simple matters with no objections and well-documented support can proceed more quickly, sometimes resolving within a few months. More contested cases or those requiring extensive discovery and multiple hearings may take significantly longer. Scheduling constraints in busy probate or trust departments also influence timing. Preparing thoroughly at the outset often shortens the overall timeline by reducing the need for supplemental filings or continuances. Engaging in early communication with beneficiaries to explore consensual solutions can further expedite resolution and avoid protracted litigation, preserving estate resources for intended beneficiaries.
Not all trusts can be modified in the same way, and the available remedies depend on the trust instrument and state law. Revocable trusts generally permit amendments when the settlor is alive and has retained amendment powers, while irrevocable trusts require stronger justification for change. Where statutory authority allows decanting or where the trust grants specific powers, nonjudicial options may exist. Otherwise, a court petition may be necessary to obtain relief. Courts consider whether modification would violate explicit terms that the settlor intended to be immutable and whether beneficiaries’ rights would be unfairly impacted. A careful review of the trust, related documents, and applicable law determines which legal path is available and appropriate for the specific circumstances.
Evidence needed to support a reformation or modification petition typically includes the trust document, prior drafts or related planning documents, correspondence, financial records, and declarations from witnesses with direct knowledge of the settlor’s intent. Contemporaneous notes, letters, or draft instruments that reflect the settlor’s actual wishes are particularly persuasive. Courts often require clear and convincing proof when correcting written instruments, so gathering strong documentary evidence is important. In addition to documentary proof, testimony or declarations from individuals who can describe the settlor’s intent or the circumstances leading to the drafting error can be helpful. Demonstrating that the proposed changes align with the settlor’s overarching objectives increases the likelihood that a court will approve reformation or modification.
Beneficiary consent can allow many trust changes to occur without court involvement when all parties with legal standing agree to amend the trust. Written, informed consents from all required beneficiaries create a nonjudicial path to modify terms, provided state law and the trust instrument permit such amendments. This route is often faster and less adversarial than petitioning the court. However, if a beneficiary cannot be located, refuses to consent, or if the trust restricts amendments, consent may not be sufficient. In such cases, a petition to the court is necessary to obtain a binding order that resolves disputes or authorizes changes that cannot be achieved informally.
Alternatives to filing a petition include beneficiary consents, which require unanimous agreement from interested parties, and trustee decanting when state law and the trust instrument authorize transferring assets into a new trust with revised terms. Nonjudicial solutions can be faster and less costly when they are legally available and all relevant parties are cooperative. Mediation and negotiation are other alternatives that can resolve disagreements without court intervention. These approaches encourage compromise and preserve relationships while minimizing expenses. When nonjudicial routes are impractical or opposed, a petition may remain the necessary method to obtain a final legal resolution.
A court order modifying a trust can clarify, expand, or limit trustee powers depending on the relief requested and the court’s findings. When the court recognizes that the trustee needs specific authority to carry out updated terms or protect assets, it may grant explicit powers in the modification order. Trustees must follow the order closely and document their actions to meet fiduciary responsibilities. If the order changes distribution standards or reporting obligations, trustees should update trust records and communications to beneficiaries accordingly. Courts may also address trustee removal or replacement if misconduct or incapacity contributed to the need for modification, ensuring the trust is administered by a person capable of carrying out the revised terms.
Modifying a trust can have tax implications depending on the nature of the changes and the types of assets involved. Alterations affecting ownership of tax-deferred accounts, the timing of distributions, or beneficial interests can change income, gift, or estate tax considerations. Evaluating potential tax consequences before finalizing changes helps avoid unintended liabilities and ensures that modifications align with overall tax planning goals. Coordination with financial and tax advisors is advisable when modifications may affect taxable events or estate tax exposure. Proper planning can mitigate unwanted tax outcomes and ensure that changes serve the settlor’s intent while preserving asset value for beneficiaries.
Trust decanting may be an effective alternative when a trustee has statutory or contractual authority to transfer assets from an older trust into a new one with revised terms. Decanting can address issues such as clarifying distribution standards, changing trustee powers, or updating administrative provisions without court involvement when allowed. Trustees must follow statutory notice requirements and act in beneficiaries’ best interests to reduce the risk of successful challenges. The availability and scope of decanting depend on state law and the trust’s provisions. Trustees should document their analysis and rationale for decanting thoroughly and consult legal counsel to confirm that the action is permissible and properly executed under applicable rules.
If you suspect a trust exists but are unsure where it is filed or who holds the original document, begin by contacting family members, the settlor’s attorney, financial institutions, and the county recorder’s office for deed-related matters. Executors or trustees often have records indicating the trust’s existence, and estate planning offices may retain copies. A careful search of personal files, safe deposit boxes, and attorney records can often locate the instrument. When attempts to locate the trust document fail, filing a petition in the appropriate probate or trust court for directions or to request the court’s assistance in identifying and locating the trust may be necessary. Courts can require notice to potential beneficiaries while the search proceeds and can provide guidance on next steps once the trust is located or its existence is confirmed.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas