A Heggstad petition is a court procedure used when trust assets were intended to be transferred into a trust but remain titled in the decedent’s or settlor’s name. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist families in Lake Isabella and throughout Kern County with the documentation and court filings necessary to show that the decedent intended trust ownership, and to move assets into the trust without unnecessary delay. Our approach emphasizes careful review of trust instruments, deeds, account records, and witness statements to build a clear record supporting the petition. If you need help, call 408-528-2827 for a consultation.
Many families discover untitled assets during administration of an estate or when settling a trust. A Heggstad petition can be the appropriate remedy when the trust document and supporting evidence indicate the settlor intended a particular asset to belong to the trust but formal title was never changed. Pursuing this petition can avoid longer, more complex probate steps and preserve the settlor’s plan for distribution. We help clients gather deeds, account statements, and declarations, prepare the necessary legal paperwork, and present a clear case to the court showing how the asset should be considered part of the trust.
A successful Heggstad petition can secure the settlor’s intended distribution while minimizing the scope of probate. When the court recognizes that an asset was meant to be held by a trust despite defective or incomplete retitling, the asset can be transferred into trust ownership without full probate administration. This outcome helps preserve privacy, reduces delay, and aligns asset control with the trust document. The petition also clarifies title for future transactions and prevents confusion among heirs and account holders. For families in Lake Isabella, a well-prepared petition protects the estate plan and helps move assets to beneficiaries in an orderly manner.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California with focused estate planning and trust administration services. Our firm assists clients of all backgrounds with resolving untitled assets, preparing petitions, and guiding families through court procedures when necessary. We prioritize clear communication, thorough preparation of documentary evidence, and steady support throughout the filing and hearing process. Clients appreciate pragmatic guidance about options, realistic timelines, and the documentation they will need. Call 408-528-2827 to discuss your situation and learn how we can help preserve the intentions created in your loved one’s trust instruments.
A Heggstad petition is a specific legal request asking the probate court to declare that particular property should be treated as trust property even though legal title was not updated. This remedy recognizes the settlor’s intent when documentary evidence and witness statements support that the asset was meant to be part of the trust. The petition typically explains how the omission occurred, provides copies of the trust and relevant account records, and may include declarations from persons who can attest to the settlor’s intent. The court then evaluates the evidence and may order the title transfer or other relief that aligns with the trust terms.
Heggstad petitions are commonly needed when deeds, account registrations, or insurance beneficiary designations were not updated before the settlor’s death or incapacity. These proceedings do not rewrite the trust, but instead ask the court to apply the trust as written by recognizing assets that were effectively intended to be held by it. The process involves filing the petition in the appropriate county, serving interested parties, and presenting proof of intent and ownership. The outcome depends on the strength of the documentation and the court’s assessment of whether the evidence establishes the settlor’s plan.
A Heggstad petition is named after a controlling California case and serves as a legal procedure to establish that certain property belongs to a trust despite title discrepancies. The petition presents the trust document, related deeds or account records, and declarations explaining why the asset should be treated as trust property. The goal is to obtain a court order confirming that the asset was meant to fund the trust, enabling transfer into the trust without a protracted probate process. The court examines the totality of evidence, weighing documents and witness testimony to reach a determination consistent with the settlor’s intentions.
A successful petition typically includes the trust instrument, documentation showing the asset and its intended placement, declarations by the trustee or other witnesses, and a clear explanation of how the omission occurred. The filing must also include proper notice to interested parties and any required supporting exhibits, such as deeds, account statements, and beneficiary forms. After filing, the court schedules a hearing where evidence and declarations are reviewed. If the court finds that the settlor intended the asset to belong to the trust, it will issue an order to transfer title or otherwise treat the asset as trust property.
Understanding common terms helps families navigate the Heggstad process. The glossary below defines central concepts such as the petition itself, probate, trust funding, and affidavits of intent. Familiarity with these terms clarifies what documents will be useful for a petition and what the court will be looking for when evaluating whether an asset should be treated as trust property. This context can make it easier to collect the right records and prepare witness statements that help the court recognize the settlor’s intentions.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used in California to request that specific property be declared trust property despite formal title not reflecting the trust. The petition sets out the trust terms, provides evidence of the settlor’s intent, and asks the probate court to issue an order recognizing or transferring the asset into the trust. This remedy narrows the legal inquiry to whether the asset was intended to be part of the trust, rather than reopening the trust or altering its provisions. The court relies on documents, statements, and other evidence to reach a decision.
Trust funding refers to the process of placing assets into a trust so they are controlled by the trust document rather than by an individual’s personal ownership. Funding typically involves retitling real estate, transferring account ownership, updating beneficiary designations, and preparing any necessary deeds or assignment documents. Proper funding ensures that assets follow the trust’s distribution instructions and can prevent assets from becoming subject to probate. A Heggstad petition addresses situations where intended funding was not completed before the settlor’s incapacity or death.
Probate is the court-supervised process of administering a decedent’s estate when assets are held in the individual’s name and no avoiding mechanism applies. The process can involve proving a will, appointing a personal representative, identifying assets, paying creditors, and distributing property to heirs. A Heggstad petition can reduce the need for broader probate administration by demonstrating that particular assets should be handled under a trust, allowing those assets to pass according to the trust terms rather than through probate procedures.
Affidavits and supporting declarations are written, sworn statements used to describe circumstances surrounding the trust and assets. In the Heggstad context, these documents may include statements from the trustee, family members, or third parties who can attest to the settlor’s intent, the asset’s connection to the trust, and the reason formal retitling did not occur. Clear, well-drafted declarations that reference documents and events strengthen the petition by providing the court with a narrative that links the asset to the trust.
When an asset remains untitled after a settlor’s death or incapacity, families typically consider either a focused Heggstad petition or broader probate administration and document corrections. A limited approach may be faster and keep the matter within trust administration procedures, while a broader plan may address multiple assets, title defects, and creditor claims in one proceeding. Evaluating the best route depends on the number and type of assets, potential disputes among beneficiaries, and the clarity of the trust and supporting evidence. We help clients weigh the tradeoffs and select an approach that aligns with family goals and timelines.
A limited filing such as a Heggstad petition may be the best option when only a small number of assets are untitled and the trust document and other evidence clearly show the settlor’s intent. When documentation like deeds, account statements, or contemporaneous instructions support the placement of these specific items in the trust, the court may resolve those items without opening full probate. This route can save time and cost by narrowing the legal issues to the title of particular assets rather than addressing the entire estate administration.
A focused petition is often effective when family members and beneficiaries agree on the settlor’s intent and there are no contested claims. Cooperative parties can provide declarations and help assemble evidence, which streamlines the court process and reduces the likelihood of contested hearings. If there is clear contemporaneous documentation and no opposing claims to the asset, the court can typically issue an order recognizing the asset as trust property, allowing for a straightforward retitling process and preserving the settlor’s distribution plan.
A comprehensive approach is often necessary when multiple assets were not properly retitled or when title issues are complex, such as property held in multiple names, unclear beneficiary designations, or conflicting account records. In such cases, a broader plan may include several petitions, corrective deeds, and coordination with financial institutions and county recorders. Addressing all affected assets together helps ensure consistency and reduces the risk that unresolved title problems will affect future transactions or distributions, while also preparing for potential creditor or beneficiary inquiries.
When there is a realistic possibility of disputes among beneficiaries or creditors, taking a comprehensive legal approach helps preserve evidence, manage communications, and reduce the chance of surprise litigation. A full strategy can include notice to interested parties, careful documentation of trustee actions, and preparation for contested hearings if necessary. This proactive planning makes it easier to defend the trust’s position, coordinate with opposing counsel if disputes arise, and seek a court ruling that resolves competing claims in a way consistent with the trust instrument and applicable law.
A comprehensive approach reduces the risk of overlooked assets and minimizes the chance that an unresolved title issue will cause future legal problems. By auditing all potential trust assets, coordinating with institutions, and filing necessary petitions or corrective documents, the process creates a durable record that supports the trust’s distribution plan. This thoroughness also helps ensure that beneficiaries receive property in an orderly way and that the trustee’s duties are properly documented, which can lower the chance of later challenges and streamline eventual distributions.
Taking a broad approach also offers practical benefits: it can consolidate multiple court actions, reduce repeated court appearances, and provide clarity to financial institutions and county recorders. This coordination saves time and administrative effort for trustees and family members. In addition, addressing title defects and incomplete funding across the estate reduces administrative overhead and avoids piecemeal solutions that might create inconsistencies. The result is a more predictable path for moving assets into the trust and executing the settlor’s intent.
A comprehensive funding and title correction plan helps minimize assets falling into probate in the future. By systematically identifying untitled property and handling each item through the proper administrative or court process, trustees reduce the potential for estates to be expanded by overlooked items. That consolidation preserves estate plan efficiency and helps beneficiaries receive their intended distributions more directly. Addressing possible title problems early also reduces the time and expense that might otherwise be required to reopen matters later when disputes or transactions arise.
Resolving title issues and obtaining court confirmation when needed gives trustees and heirs clear authority to manage or sell assets. Court orders and corrected records make it easier to complete real estate transactions, transfer accounts, or otherwise administer property in accord with the trust. That clarity reduces friction with banks, title companies, and other institutions, and it helps prevent delays that could diminish asset value or complicate distributions. Clear title documentation also provides peace of mind to beneficiaries and reduces the likelihood of later disputes.
Begin by assembling the original trust document, any amendments, deeds, account statements, and insurance or retirement beneficiary forms. Collecting these records provides the factual backbone for a Heggstad petition and helps identify which assets were intended for the trust. Also gather correspondence, receipts, and bank records that show transfers or instructions. Organized documentation speeds the review process, supports clear declarations, and enables the preparation of exhibits that a probate court will review when determining whether an asset should be treated as trust property.
A Heggstad petition requires providing notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties so they may respond or appear at a hearing. Identify and serve all appropriate persons, and be prepared to respond to questions or claims. Documentation of service and timely filings helps avoid procedural delays. Anticipating potential objections and developing clear documentary support before filing improves the odds of a streamlined hearing. Communicating early with family members and institutions can also reduce surprises and promote cooperative resolution of title and funding issues.
Filing a Heggstad petition is often considered when the settlor clearly intended certain property to be in a trust but the legal title was not updated. This situation commonly arises with real estate, bank accounts, and personal property that remain in the settlor’s name. The petition helps align legal records with the settlor’s distribution plan, preserving privacy and reducing the administrative burden compared with opening full probate. If the trust is otherwise valid and the evidence supports the settlor’s intent, the petition provides a targeted remedy to secure intended asset transfers.
Another reason to pursue this service is to avoid delays that can arise when assets are overlooked during trust administration. Untitled assets may complicate transactions or block distributions to beneficiaries. By addressing these items promptly through the correct legal process, trustees can ensure assets are managed according to the trust and reduce the risk of future challenges. The petition also creates a court record that documents the trustee’s actions and the court’s assessment, which can be valuable for recordkeeping and future transactions.
Typical circumstances include a deed that was not recorded in the trust’s name, bank or brokerage accounts still in the settlor’s personal name, life insurance proceeds with outdated beneficiary designations, and other assets that were intended for the trust but never formally transferred. These lapses often occur due to oversight, illness, or sudden death. When identified, each affected asset may require documentary proof of intent and possible court action to confirm trust ownership so that assets pass according to the trust terms rather than through probate.
A frequent scenario is real estate that was intended to be part of a trust but remains titled in the decedent’s individual name. This can occur when deed transfers were not recorded prior to death or when transfers were prepared but not finalized. To resolve this, a Heggstad petition can request a court determination that the property belongs to the trust based on the trust document, deeds in draft form, or statements about the settlor’s intent. If granted, the court order enables recording a corrected deed that reflects trust ownership.
Bank accounts, investment accounts, and retirement accounts sometimes retain the settlor’s name even though the trust was intended to receive those assets. Institutions may require court orders or beneficiary documentation to change ownership. The Heggstad petition process documents the intent and asks the court to recognize the asset as trust property, which can then be retitled or transferred in accordance with institutional procedures. Acting promptly helps prevent freezes on accounts and facilitates timely access for trustees who must manage ongoing expenses or distributions.
When a settlor becomes incapacitated or passes away, previously planned funding steps may remain incomplete, leaving assets outside the trust. This incomplete funding complicates administration and can create disputes about the settlor’s intentions. A Heggstad petition offers a path to have the court recognize those assets as part of the trust based on available evidence. The petition can be particularly useful when the trust contains language or contemporaneous documentation that clearly demonstrates the settlor intended the assets to be governed by the trust.
If you are dealing with untitled assets in Lake Isabella, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help you assess whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and guide you through the filing and hearing process. We work with trustees and family members to collect documentation, prepare declarations, and communicate with institutions and interested parties. Our office provides practical guidance about expected timelines and necessary evidence. To discuss your situation and learn the next steps, contact us at 408-528-2827 and we will schedule an initial consultation to review your documents.
Clients choose our firm because of a pragmatic, document-focused approach to trust-related court filings. We begin with a careful review of the trust instrument and all supporting documents, identifying the most effective path to demonstrate the settlor’s intent. Communication with trustees and family members is prioritized so that everyone understands the process, timeline, and likely outcomes. We prepare filings to present a clear, concise case to the court and coordinate service and notices to minimize procedural setbacks and delays.
Our firm handles the administrative and procedural details so trustees and family members can focus on personal matters during a difficult time. This includes assembling exhibits, drafting declarations, preparing the petition and proposed orders, and communicating with financial institutions and county offices as necessary. We aim to present filings that are thorough and persuasive while keeping clients informed at each step. Our goal is to achieve a practical resolution that honors the settlor’s intent and helps move assets into the trust efficiently.
We also advise clients about alternatives and next steps in the event of contest or institutional resistance. That includes preparing responses, coordinating additional evidence, and discussing whether broader probate or corrective deeds are appropriate. Throughout the process we emphasize clear recordkeeping and an organized presentation to the court. If you need assistance preparing a Heggstad petition or addressing incomplete trust funding in Lake Isabella or elsewhere in Kern County, call 408-528-2827 to arrange a consultation.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and document review, followed by careful evidence gathering and drafting of the petition and supporting declarations. We assess whether a focused petition or a broader strategy is needed, identify interested parties for notice, and prepare exhibits for the court. After filing, we handle service, monitor responses, and represent the case at any hearing. Upon a court order we assist with the recording of deeds or account transfers to ensure the asset is properly treated as trust property and ready for administration or distribution.
The initial step involves collecting the trust document, any amendments, deeds, account statements, and relevant correspondence. We review these materials to confirm the trust terms and identify assets that appear to have been intended for the trust but remain untitled. This review clarifies the evidence needed for a petition and helps determine whether additional statements or documents should be sought from witnesses, institutions, or other parties. A comprehensive intake reduces surprises and helps tailor the filing strategy.
Gathering original documents and copies of deeds, bank records, and account statements provides the concrete facts the court will review. We identify the chain of title, any draft deeds or assignments, and any correspondence that shows the settlor’s funding intent. Where originals are unavailable, certified copies and institutional records may suffice. A clear documentary record simplifies exhibit preparation and supports declarations that recount steps taken to fund the trust and explain why formal retitling did not occur prior to incapacity or death.
We examine title records and beneficiary designations to determine how each asset is currently held and whether institutional procedures will require court orders. This review includes evaluating whether joint tenancy, pay-on-death registrations, or beneficiary forms conflict with trust instructions. Identifying these issues early enables us to craft a petition that addresses the court’s likely concerns and to anticipate institutional requirements for retitling or distribution once the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property.
After gathering evidence, we draft the petition and supporting declarations, assemble exhibits, and prepare the service list. The petition explains the trust terms, the asset at issue, and the factual basis for recognizing the asset as trust property. We ensure notices comply with procedural rules so interested parties receive proper opportunity to respond. Clear, organized filings improve the court’s ability to assess the case and reduce the likelihood of procedural delays or requests for further documentation.
Drafting the petition and affidavits requires statements that connect the trust instrument to the specific asset and explain the circumstances of any omission. Declarations should be detailed and reference supporting exhibits, such as draft deeds or account statements. The petition must articulate the relief requested and propose specific orders for the court’s consideration. Preparing these documents carefully reduces the chance of additional court requests and supports a more efficient hearing.
We arrange proper service on heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties and document that service for the court. If objections arise, we assess their basis and prepare responses, additional declarations, or negotiations as appropriate. Clear communication and timely filings can often resolve informal concerns without a contested hearing, but when necessary we prepare for court presentation to address disputes about ownership or intent. Proper notice and responsiveness are key to avoiding procedural setbacks.
At the hearing, we present the petition and supporting declarations, answer the court’s questions, and address any objections. If the court concludes the evidence supports trust ownership, it issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property or directing how title should be handled. After the order is entered, we assist with recording deeds, updating account registrations, or coordinating with institutions to effect the transfer. The final step is documenting the transfer to ensure the trustee can manage or distribute the asset as required by the trust.
During the hearing the court evaluates the trust document, exhibits, and sworn declarations. We are prepared to explain the chain of events, the settlor’s intent, and any practical steps that demonstrate the link between the asset and the trust. Clear, focused presentation of the facts helps the court reach a decision without unnecessary delay. If questions or objections arise from other parties, we offer factual responses and legal arguments grounded in the documentation assembled during the intake and drafting stages.
Once the court issues an order, we guide trustees through the administrative steps required to finalize the transfer. That may include recording a corrective deed with the county recorder, working with banks or brokerages to change account registrations, and providing institutions with certified copies of court orders and trust documents. Completing these steps creates a clear ownership chain for future transactions and ensures assets are properly managed and distributed under the trust’s terms, reducing the potential for later disputes.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing asking the court to recognize that certain property should be treated as trust property even though legal title was never changed to the trust. It is used when the trust instrument and supporting evidence show that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust but formal retitling did not occur, often due to oversight, illness, or unexpected death. The petition presents the trust, related documents, and witness declarations to demonstrate intent and request a court order that aligns title with the trust. This process is appropriate when specific assets are clearly connected to the trust and a targeted court order can put those assets under trust control without opening full probate. It is not used to alter the trust’s terms but to enforce them by resolving title discrepancies. A Heggstad petition streamlines resolution for individual assets, and when the court grants the order it facilitates retitling and further administration consistent with the trust.
Timing varies based on case complexity, the county court’s schedule, and whether interested parties object. Simple, uncontested petitions with strong documentation can move through intake, filing, and hearing in a matter of a few weeks to a few months. More complex matters, multiple affected assets, or contested petitions can extend the timeline as discovery, responses, or additional hearings may be required. Factors such as the need for additional evidence or the time required to serve interested parties also affect how quickly a case reaches resolution. Preparation is a key factor affecting duration: assembling complete trust documents, deeds, account statements, and witness declarations early streamlines the filing and reduces the chance the court will request further proof. If objections arise, resolving them through negotiation or preparing a contested hearing requires additional time. We advise clients about realistic timelines during intake based on the specifics of the file and the local court’s calendar.
Supportive documents commonly include the trust instrument and any amendments, copies of deeds or draft deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and correspondence that indicates the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Declarations from trustees, family members, or professionals who observed the settlor’s actions or heard their instructions are also important. These declarations should be detailed, reference specific documents, and explain why formal retitling did not occur before incapacity or death. In some situations additional records are helpful, such as title reports, closing statements, or institutional paperwork showing attempted transfers. The court relies on both documentary evidence and sworn statements to determine intent. Collecting comprehensive records in advance reduces delays and strengthens the presentation at hearing, so trustees and family members should prioritize locating originals or certified copies when possible.
Not all beneficiaries must agree for a Heggstad petition to be filed. The petitioner must provide proper notice to heirs, beneficiaries, and other interested parties, allowing them to appear or object. If beneficiaries agree, proceedings can be straightforward and uncontested. When there is disagreement, the court will consider objections and the presented evidence before ruling. Proper notice and documentation remain essential, regardless of whether beneficiaries are cooperative. When objections arise, the court may schedule a contested hearing to evaluate competing claims. The outcome then depends on the strength of the evidence, the credibility of declarations, and applicable law. Even if some parties object, a clear record demonstrating the settlor’s intent can lead the court to grant the requested order. Preparing thorough evidence and being responsive to objections improves the likelihood of a favorable resolution.
Heggstad petitions can apply to many types of assets, including bank accounts and certain other financial accounts, provided the evidence supports that these accounts were intended to be trust property. Each financial institution may have specific procedures for changing ownership or releasing funds, and the court order resulting from a petition can be used to satisfy those institutional requirements. It is important to identify how each account is titled and whether beneficiary designations or transfer-on-death arrangements exist. Retirement accounts can present additional considerations because some accounts require beneficiary designation updates rather than retitling to a trust. In some cases a pour-over will or beneficiary designation interacts with trust distribution plans, and the appropriate remedy depends on the account type and institutional rules. A careful review of account agreements and institutional policies helps determine whether a Heggstad petition or another corrective action is the best path.
A Heggstad petition is focused on recognizing particular assets as trust property and does not replace the probate process when full estate administration is otherwise needed. Probate is the broader procedure for administering assets held in an individual’s name without a trust remedy, involving appointment of a personal representative and a larger court-supervised administration. By contrast, a Heggstad petition asks the court to treat specific assets as trust property so they avoid broader probate distribution, thereby narrowing the legal issues to the title of those assets. Choosing between a petition and probate depends on the asset portfolio and legal issues involved. When most property is already in a trust and only a few items are untitled, a targeted petition can be faster and less burdensome. When multiple assets are untitled or creditor issues and other estate administration matters exist, a broader probate may be necessary. We assess each matter to recommend the appropriate pathway based on the facts.
If someone objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will provide an opportunity to address the objection, which may include a contested hearing in which each side presents evidence and arguments. Common objections challenge whether the settlor truly intended the asset to be in the trust or raise competing claims of ownership. Preparing thorough documentation and clear declarations helps counter objections by demonstrating the settlor’s intent and the factual basis for the request. In some cases, objections can be resolved through discussion or by supplementing the record with additional evidence. When objections proceed to hearing, the court evaluates the evidence and decides whether the petitioner met the burden of proof required for the requested relief. That may result in an order granting the petition in whole or in part, or denying it. Anticipating potential objections and preparing a robust evidentiary record increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome and helps avoid protracted litigation.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include corrective deeds, institutional claim processes, or, when appropriate, opening probate administration to address untitled assets. In some cases financial institutions will accept affidavits, letters of administration, or other documentation that satisfies their internal requirements to transfer accounts, though institutions vary in the documentation they will accept. A corrective deed recorded with the county recorder can remedy real property title defects when circumstances permit, while certain transfers may be managed administratively without court involvement if all interested parties cooperate. When disputes exist or institutions refuse administrative transfers, a petition provides a judicial remedy that clarifies ownership and generates an enforceable order. We evaluate alternatives based on the asset type, institutional rules, the strength of documentary evidence, and the presence of competing claims, then recommend the most efficient pathway to resolve title issues consistent with the settlor’s intent.
After the court issues an order recognizing an asset as trust property, the order and supporting documents are used to update public records and institutional registrations. For real property the typical next step is recording a corrective deed with the county recorder that reflects the trust as the property owner. For bank and brokerage accounts, institutions will usually accept a certified copy of the court order and certified trust documents to effect ownership changes or distribution according to the trust’s terms. Accurate recordkeeping is essential for future transactions. We assist trustees with the administrative steps required after a ruling, including preparing deed forms, coordinating with title companies, and providing institutions with the necessary certified paperwork. Completing these actions ensures the court’s order has practical effect and helps prevent future disputes about ownership or the trustee’s authority to manage or distribute the asset.
To begin the process, gather the trust document and any amendments, deeds, account statements, beneficiary forms, and any correspondence that relates to the asset in question. Contact our office to schedule an initial consultation during which we will review the documents, explain the options, and advise whether a Heggstad petition is likely to be the appropriate remedy. Early document collection and a clear description of the asset’s history help streamline the assessment and filing process. During the initial meeting we discuss potential timelines, possible costs, and the evidence needed for a strong filing. If we proceed, we will prepare the petition and declarations, arrange service of notice to interested parties, and represent the matter in court as needed. Call 408-528-2827 to start the review process and determine the best next steps for resolving untitled assets under the trust.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas